25
Carbon Sinks and Land Use Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition Competition EUFASOM EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues INSEA Colleagues

Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Carbon Sinks and Land Use Carbon Sinks and Land Use CompetitionCompetition

EUFASOMEUFASOM

Uwe A. SchneiderUwe A. Schneider

Dagmar SchwabDagmar Schwab

INSEA ColleaguesINSEA Colleagues

Page 2: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Food

Non-Food

Carbon Sinks

Land use competition

Page 3: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Model StructureModel Structure

Resources Land Use

Technologies

Processing Technologies

Products Markets

Inputs

Limits

Supply Functions

Limits

Demand Functions,Trade

Limits

Environmental Impacts

Page 4: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Processing

Markets

Feed mixing

Labor

Pasture

Other Inputs

Cropland

Water

Livestock production

Forestry, Nature,Crop

productionExport

Domestic demand

Import

Model StructureModel StructureForest

Inventory

Page 5: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Objective FunctionObjective Function

Demand

Supply

Price

Quantity

P*

Q*

ResourceRents

ConsumerSurplus

Page 6: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Surplus MaximizationSurplus Maximization

Impl

icit

Sup

ply

and

Dem

and

For

est I

nven

tory

Lan

d S

uppl

yW

ater

Sup

ply

Lab

or S

uppl

yA

nim

al S

uppl

yN

atio

nal I

nput

s

Impo

rt S

uppl

y

Pro

cess

ing

Dem

and

Fee

d D

eman

dD

omes

tic D

eman

dE

xpor

t Dem

and

CS

P

S

Page 7: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Spatial ResolutionSpatial Resolution

Soil textureSoil texture

Stone contentStone content

Altitude levelsAltitude levels

SlopesSlopes

Soil stateSoil state

Political regionsPolitical regions

Ownership (forests)Ownership (forests)

Farm typesFarm types

Farm sizeFarm size

Many crop and tree Many crop and tree speciesspecies

Tillage, planting Tillage, planting irrigation, fertilization irrigation, fertilization harvest regimeharvest regime

Page 8: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

EUFASOM DynamicsEUFASOM Dynamics

5 (to 20) year time steps5 (to 20) year time steps

State of forests (and soil organic matter)State of forests (and soil organic matter)

Technical progressTechnical progress

Demand & industry growthDemand & industry growth

Resource and global changeResource and global change

Policy scenariosPolicy scenarios

Page 9: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

State of the ArtState of the Art

Enormous flexibility (resolve acc. needs)Enormous flexibility (resolve acc. needs)

Index notationIndex notation

– millions of data, variables, and equations millions of data, variables, and equations with sparse programming statementswith sparse programming statements

– ensures consistency (model development)ensures consistency (model development)

Extensive generic equation checks (30 checks Extensive generic equation checks (30 checks per equation)per equation)

Systematic solution analysis (symptom to Systematic solution analysis (symptom to cause)cause)

Page 10: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Positive VariablesPositive VariablesRESOURCE_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,RESOURCE) RESOURCE_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,RESOURCE)

FOREST_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,OWNER,AGE,FORTECH) FOREST_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,OWNER,AGE,FORTECH)

PEREN_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,AGE,CROPTECH) PEREN_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,AGE,CROPTECH)

CROP_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,CROPTECH) CROP_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,CROPTECH)

LIVE_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,LIVETECH) LIVE_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,LIVETECH)

FEED_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,PRODUCT,FEEDTECH)FEED_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,PRODUCT,FEEDTECH)

ECO_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,ECOTECH) ECO_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,ECOTECH)

PROCESS_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,PROCTECH) PROCESS_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,PROCTECH)

LUC_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,CHANGE) LUC_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,CHANGE)

DEMAND_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT) DEMAND_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT)

SUPPLY_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT) SUPPLY_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT)

TRADE_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,REGION,PRODUCT) TRADE_VAR (PERIOD,REGION,REGION,PRODUCT)

Page 11: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

EquationsEquationsOBJECTIVE_EQU OBJECTIVE_EQU

RESOURCEBAL_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,RESOURCE) RESOURCEBAL_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,RESOURCE)

RESOURCEMAX_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,RESOURCE) RESOURCEMAX_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,RESOURCE)

SOILSTATE_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE) SOILSTATE_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE)

FORINVENT_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,OWNER,AGE,FORTECH) FORINVENT_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,OWNER,AGE,FORTECH)

LUC_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,CHANGE) LUC_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,CHANGE)

LUCLIMIT_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,CHANGE) LUCLIMIT_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,CHANGE)

STOCK_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,STOCK)STOCK_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,STOCK)

EMIT_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SUBSTANCE)EMIT_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,SUBSTANCE)

PRODUCTBAL_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT) PRODUCTBAL_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT)

MINFEED_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,NUTRIENT) MINFEED_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,NUTRIENT)

MAXFEED_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,NUTRIENT) MAXFEED_EQU (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,NUTRIENT)

Page 12: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

DataDataFOREST_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,AGE,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)FOREST_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,AGE,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)

PEREN_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,AGE,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)PEREN_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,AGE,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)

CROP_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)CROP_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,SPECIES,FARM,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)

ECO_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)ECO_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SOILSTATE,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)

LIVE_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)LIVE_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ANIMAL,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)

FEED_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)FEED_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)

PROCESS_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)PROCESS_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ALLTECH,ALLITEM)

PRODUCT_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLITEM)PRODUCT_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLITEM)

MARKET_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ALLITEM,SDTYPE,SDITEM)MARKET_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ALLITEM,SDTYPE,SDITEM)

TRADE_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLITEM)TRADE_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLITEM)

RESOURCE_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ALLRESOURCE,SDITEM)RESOURCE_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,ALLRESOURCE,SDITEM)

STOCK_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLITEM)STOCK_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,PRODUCT,ALLITEM)

LUC_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,ALLCHANGE,ALLITEM)LUC_DATA (PERIOD,REGION,SOILTYPE,SPECIES,ALLCHANGE,ALLITEM)

Page 13: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Pre-Solution AnalysisPre-Solution Analysis

Identifies structural errorsIdentifies structural errors– Missing dataMissing data– Illegal dataIllegal data– Wrong signsWrong signs

More than 30 general variable and More than 30 general variable and equation checksequation checks

Page 14: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

CropCrop Technology Technology DataData Base Base

RegionRegion AltitudAltitud SoilSoil FarmFarm RotationRotation WaterWater TillageTillage FertilzFertilz ResidueResidue ItemItem UnitUnit ValueValue

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic WheatWheat dt/ha/ydt/ha/y 5050

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic S-BeatS-Beat dt/ha/ydt/ha/y 200200

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic StrawStraw dt/ha/ydt/ha/y 5050

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic LaborLabor hr/ha/yhr/ha/y 3030

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic LandLand ha/ha/yha/ha/y 11

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic DieselDiesel l/ha/yl/ha/y 4040

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic CostsCosts Eur/ha/yEur/ha/y 300300

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic Soil-CSoil-C kg/ha/ykg/ha/y 5050

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic ErosionErosion kg/ha/ykg/ha/y 1515

PolandPoland 0-3000-300 SandSand ES3ES3 W-W-SW-W-S IrrigIrrig Conv.Conv. BasicBasic BasicBasic NO3-LNO3-L kg/ha/ykg/ha/y 2020

Page 15: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Mitigation PotentialsMitigation Potentials

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Car

bon

pric

e (E

uro/

tce)

Mitigation (mmtce)

TechnicalPotentialCompetitive

Potential

Page 16: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

0 20 40 60 80 100

Bill

ion

Eu

ros

Carbon Equivalent (CE) Prices in Euros per Ton

Changes in Welfare Accounts

Gross Ag-Producer Surplus

Emission Payments

Net Ag-Producer Surplus

Ag-Consumer Surplus

Page 17: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

GHG Mitigation and MarketsGHG Mitigation and Markets

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Fis

her

ind

ex

Carbon price (Euro/tce)

Crop prices

Livestock prices

Livestock production

Crop productionNet exports

Page 18: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Afforestation PotentialsAfforestation Potentials

0

100

200

300

400

500

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Car

bon

pric

e (E

uro/

tce)

Emission reduction (mmtce)

Technical Potential

Economic PotentialCompetitive

Economic Potential

Page 19: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Forest Policy: Crop EmissionsForest Policy: Crop EmissionsE

mis

sion

s (k

g C

/ha)

Carbon price (Euro/tce)

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Nitrogen Fertilizer

Ag-Soil Carbon

Irrigation Use

Fossil Fuel Use

Page 20: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Car

bon

Pri

ce in

Eur

o/m

tce

Total Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emission Abatement in mmtce

Competitive Economic Potential

Simult. Technical Potential

Independent Geographic Potential

IndependentTechnical Potential

Page 21: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Car

bon

Pri

ce in

Eur

o/m

tce

Total Agricultural and Forest Greenhouse Gas Emission Abatement in mmtce

Crop Area Fixed

Crop Area and

Prices Fixed

Crop Area and Prices Endogenous

Prices Fixed

Page 22: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 20 40 60 80 100

Ene

rgy

Cro

ps (

mil

lion

hec

tare

s)

Carbon tax on energy (Euro/ton of carbon)

2010 Capacity

2030 Capacity

2050 Capacity

UnrestrictedCapacity

Power Plant Biomass SupplyPower Plant Biomass Supply

Page 23: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Lan

d A

lloc

atio

n

Carbon Tax

Pasture

Traditional Crops

Biomass for Power Plants

Afforestation

Page 24: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

OutlookOutlook

Analysis of major FASOM resultsAnalysis of major FASOM results

Downscaling (EFEM, AROPAJ)Downscaling (EFEM, AROPAJ)

Upscaling (GAINS, MESSAGE)Upscaling (GAINS, MESSAGE)

Page 25: Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues

Thanks Thanks