1
Carsten Butsch - University of Cologne Access to Healthcare in the fragmented setting of India‘s fast growing agglomerations The fast growing cities of India can best be described as a fragmented setting. They do not show medium scaled quarters consisting of homogenous neighbourhoods. At the same time the urban environment in most cases is synonymous with unhealthy living conditions, especially for the poor. The ability to cope with ill health varies grossly between socio-economic groups, as financial restrictions are an important limiting factor for accessing health care. A combination of the concept of access and the theory of the fragmented development will help to identify the most vulnerable groups within emerging megacities and might help to improve public health strategies. 2007 Summer Academy Megacities: Social vulnerability and resilience building Fragmentation The fast urban growth in India‘s megacities leads to an also visible disconnection of lifestyles and different groups (social, cultural, ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ of the globalization) within one city on a small scale level. As graph 1 illustrates this results in different, parallel existing realities. Contacts between the groups are few and mostly restricted to employment relationships. Islands of Wealth Oceans of Poverty Driving Forces: External: Globalization Privatization Neoliberalism Internal : Status Security Lifestyle Driving Forces: External: Neoliberalism Deregulation Pauperization Internal : Marignalizati Survival necessities Places of Informal activity Low-cost Housing projects Squatter Settlements Inner-city Slums Gated Communities Shopping Centres Entertainment Centres Revitalized Areas Urban fragments Urban fragments Source:Coy 2005 ( slightly changed ) raph 1: Urban Fragmentation Access to Healthcare Parker defined access to healthcare in 1974 as „the ability to reach, obtain, or afford entrance to services“. This early definition shows, that access is not only related to travelling but includes also social and spatial barriers and facilitators. Penchansky and Thomas defined five dimensions of access (cf. Graph 2). Khan and Bhardwaj suggested the matrix shown in graph 3 for the analysis of access. The categories introduced by Penchansky and Thomas are translated into this framework as Accommodation and Acceptability are the aspatial factors in the matrix, Accessibility is the spatial component, Affordability is represented by the costs and the Availability is reflected by the opportunities. Access Availability Accessibilit Accomodation Acceptability Affordability Volume Geogr. Relationship Organisation Attitudes Financial Source:Own Draft based on Penchansky, R. and Thomas, J. Ia Opportunities Ib Costs IIa Opportunities IIb Cost IIIa Opportunities IIIb Costs IVa Opportunities IVb Cost Spatial Aspatial Source: Khan and Bhardwaj 1994, slightly changen raph 2: Dimensions of Access ph 3: Matrix for analysing Access Research Question Why and how does the access to health care vary within the emerging megacity of Pune. How do the both sides of the market, demand and supply, perceive and react to these differences? Middle Class/ Slum Area Peths Cantonment Middle Class/ Slum Area, New Gated Community Research Area Type/Name Source:Google Earth Download Jan 2nd 2007 Graph 4: Research Areas Methods/ Research Areas Mapping will be used to assess the potential spatial access (cf. Graph 3: Ib), a representative household survey will provide information on the treatment seeking behaviour (IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb). In depth interviews (Ib,IIa, Iib) with participants of this survey will reveal about the individual costs of access as well as personal barriers and facilitators for accessing certain facilities. Also expert interviews will be applied on these questions. Six areas (cf. graph 4) reflect on the one hand different stages of Pune’s growth and on the other hand different income and lifestyle groups. Two areas are situated, next to each other in the old city centre, A third area is situated in the former British cantonment housing today upper-middle class residents.The fourth and the fifth area of a middle class are and three slum plots surrounding it. The sixth area is a gated community, which is not only used for housing but also for business purposes, mostly IT. The research is carried out under the framework of the project „Governing Emerging Megacities: Water, Health and Housing in Pearl-River-Delta, China and Pune, India“ Funded by the German Ministry for Research Academic partner for the research is Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Environmental Eduction and Research. Institutional Partner is the Pune Municipal Corporation. The Author is member of the Geomed research group at the University of Cologne. Contact: Carsten

Carsten Butsch - University of Cologne

  • Upload
    halima

  • View
    42

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2007 Summer Academy Megacities: Social vulnerability and resilience building. Carsten Butsch - University of Cologne Access to Healthcare in the fragmented setting of India‘s fast growing agglomerations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Carsten Butsch - University of Cologne

Carsten Butsch - University of Cologne Access to Healthcare in the fragmented setting of India‘s fast growing agglomerationsThe fast growing cities of India can best be described as a fragmented setting. They do not show medium scaled quarters consisting of homogenous neighbourhoods. At the same time the urban environment in most cases is synonymous with unhealthy living conditions, especially for the poor. The ability to cope with ill health varies grossly between socio-economic groups, as financial restrictions are an important limiting factor for accessing health care. A combination of the concept of access and the theory of the fragmented development will help to identify the most vulnerable groups within emerging megacities and might help to improve public health strategies.

2007 Summer AcademyMegacities: Social vulnerability and resilience building

FragmentationThe fast urban growth in India‘s megacities leads to an also visible disconnection of lifestyles and different groups (social, cultural, ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ of the globalization) within one city on a small scale level. As graph 1 illustrates this results in different, parallel existing realities. Contacts between the groups are few and mostly restricted to employment relationships.

Islands of Wealth

Oceans of Poverty

DrivingForces:

External:GlobalizationPrivatizationNeoliberalism

Internal:StatusSecurityLifestyle

DrivingForces:

External:NeoliberalismDeregulationPauperization

Internal:MarignalizationSurvivalnecessities

Places ofInformal activity

Low-costHousing projects

SquatterSettlements

Inner-citySlums

Gated Communities

ShoppingCentres

EntertainmentCentres

Revitalized Areas

Urbanfragments

Urbanfragments

Source: Coy 2005 (slightly changed)

Graph 1: Urban Fragmentation Access to HealthcareParker defined access to healthcare in 1974 as „the ability to reach, obtain, or afford entrance to services“. This early definition shows, that access is not only related to travelling but includes also social and spatial barriers and facilitators. Penchansky and Thomas defined five dimensions of access (cf. Graph 2). Khan and Bhardwaj suggested the matrix shown in graph 3 for the analysis of access. The categories introduced by Penchansky and Thomas are translated into this framework as Accommodation and Acceptability are the aspatial factors in the matrix, Accessibility is the spatial component, Affordability is represented by the costs and the Availability is reflected by the opportunities.

Access

Availability

Accessibility

AccomodationAcceptability

Affordability

Volume

Geogr.Relationship

OrganisationAttitudes

Financial

Source: Own Draft based on Penchansky, R. and Thomas, J. 1984

Ia Opportunities

Ib Costs

IIa Opportunities

IIb Costs

IIIa Opportunities

IIIb Costs

IVa Opportunities

IVb Costs

Spatial Aspatial

Source: Khan and Bhardwaj 1994, slightly changen

Graph 2: Dimensions of Access

Graph 3: Matrix for analysing Access

Research QuestionWhy and how does the access to health care vary within the emerging megacity of Pune. How do the both sides of the market, demand and supply, perceive and react to these differences?

Middle Class/Slum Area Peths

Cantonment

Middle Class/Slum Area, New

Gated Community

Research Area

Type/Name

Source: Google EarthDownload Jan 2nd 2007

Graph 4: Research Areas

Methods/ Research AreasMapping will be used to assess the potential spatial access (cf. Graph 3: Ib), a representative household survey will provide information on the treatment seeking behaviour (IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb). In depth interviews (Ib,IIa, Iib) with participants of this survey will reveal about the individual costs of access as well as personal barriers and facilitators for accessing certain facilities. Also expert interviews will be applied on these questions. Six areas (cf. graph 4) reflect on the one hand different stages of Pune’s growth and on the other hand different income and lifestyle groups. Two areas are situated, next to each other in the old city centre, A third area is situated in the former British cantonment housing today upper-middle class residents.The fourth and the fifth area of a middle class are and three slum plots surrounding it. The sixth area is a gated community, which is not only used for housing but also for business purposes, mostly IT.

The research is carried out under the framework of the project „Governing Emerging Megacities: Water, Health and Housing in Pearl-River-Delta, China and Pune, India“ Funded by the German Ministry for Research Academic partner for the research is Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Environmental Eduction and Research. Institutional Partner is the Pune Municipal Corporation. The Author is member of the Geomed research group at the University of Cologne. Contact: Carsten Butsch. Geographisches Institut der Universität zu Köln. Albertus-Magnus-Platz. 50923 Köln, Germany. [email protected]