Upload
christopher-stanley
View
223
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
How to define a bifurcation lesion? No matter which kind of classification of bifurcation lesions, imaging characteristics is basic and important. But is it enough? What’s the objective for us to treat bifurcation using 1- or 2-stent technique? Keep two branch patency with effective anterior flow for a long time.
Citation preview
Case report of FFR for bifurcation
Nanjing first hospitalNanjing heart centerYefei chenshaoliang
Evidence of FFR guided PCI • For single lesion: DEFER study;• For multivessel disease: FAME study;• For bifurcation lesions using 1-stent technique: Koo
BK, et al. Eur Heart J 2008;• For bifurcation lesions using 2-stent technique: NO DATA NOW
How to define a bifurcation lesion?
• No matter which kind of classification of bifurcation lesions, imaging characteristics is basic and important.
• But is it enough?• What’s the objective for us to treat bifurcation
using 1- or 2-stent technique? Keep two branch patency with effective anterior flow for a long time.
A bifurcation of 1-stent technique case report
• MAY, m, 70ys• Angina pectoris for over 1 mon• Risk factors: EH, EL, DM• Echo: EF 54%, LVDd 55mm
CAG result
Classification of the bifurcation
From CAG, classification of LCX-OM is 1,1,0 or 1,1,1
But how about functional result and IVUS result?
FFR of LCX-OM bif
LCX-OM
LCX-PL
Is that true of FFR for both MB and SB?
Pitfalls in FFR Measurement of Bifurcation
中心 Pd′ (SB) Pd(SB)
SB
MB
Pd(MB)
Pd′ (MB)
Pa′
Pa
Proximal MB lesion
Distal MB lesion
Distal SB lesion
FFR MB including distal MB lesion and proximal MB lesion
FFR SB including distal SB lesion and proximal MB lesion
Strategy for the bifurcation lesion only according to FFR result
1-stent strategy or 2-stent strategy?
But from FFR result, we can not define the classification 1,1,1 or 1,1,0 or 1,0,0.
Strategy for the bifurcation is 1-stent technique
Last result-after kissing
Follow-up after 10 month
FFR result at follow-up
LCX-OM
LCX-PL
Case 2 report
• Male, 63yrs, • Chest pain for 1 mon,• Risk factors: smoking, HL• DIA: UAP, EH
CAG result
After 2 stent implanted
FFR result before PCI
FFR (LAD)
FFR (D1)
From the CAG and FFR result, it’s a true bifurcation lesion of medina classification 0,1,1
FFR result after PCI
FFR (LAD) after stenting
FFR (D1) after stenting
FFR (LAD) after stenting
Follow up result after 6 mon
FFR follow-up after 6 mon
FFR (LAD)
FFR (D1)
Summary of 2 cases
• Maybe FFR is not good for classification of bifurcation lesions compared with imaging result such as angiogram or IVUS et al.
• FFR is suitable for forecasting outcome for bifurcation treatment in the future.
• We need randomized, multicenter, large sample size study for using FFR guided bifurcation PCI.
Thanks for your attention