35
Case Study 36 Henry Armah, M.D., M.Phil.

Case Study 36

  • Upload
    seth

  • View
    20

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Case Study 36. Henry Armah, M.D., M.Phil. Question 1. Clinical history: 14-year-old male with history of persistent headache and vomiting. Describe the abnormal cranial MRI findings?. Axial T1. Sag T1+C. Answer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Case Study 36

Case Study 36Henry Armah, M.D., M.Phil.

Page 2: Case Study 36

Question 1Clinical history: 14-year-old male with history of persistent headache and vomiting. Describe the abnormal cranial MRI findings?

Page 3: Case Study 36

Axial T1

Page 4: Case Study 36

Sag T1+C

Page 5: Case Study 36

AnswerContrast enhancing tumor in the fourth ventricle anteriorly impinging upon the lower pons, with no discernible hydrocephalus and no discernible meningeal enhancement.

Page 6: Case Study 36

Question 2What are your differential diagnoses based on the patients’ age and the radiological findings?

Page 7: Case Study 36

Answer1. Medulloblastoma

2. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor

3. Ependymoma

4. Choroid plexus carcinoma

5. Pilocytic astrocytoma

Page 8: Case Study 36

Question 3The neurosurgeon performs a craniotomy with biopsy of the mass and requested an intraoperative consultation. Describe the microscopic findings on this smear slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 9: Case Study 36

AnswerNeoplastic proliferation of round-to-oval pleomorphic tumor cells with scant cytoplasm, nuclear molding, scattered mitotic figures and numerous apoptotic bodies.

Page 10: Case Study 36

Question 4

What is your intraoperative diagnosis? (A: Category such as Defer, Reactive/Non-neoplastic, or Neoplastic; B: More specific diagnosis or statement)

Page 11: Case Study 36

AnswerA. Neoplasm

B. Medulloblastoma

Page 12: Case Study 36

Question 5Subsequently, the mass was almost completely excised. The permanent section has returned from histology. Describe the microscopic findings on this H&E slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 13: Case Study 36

AnswerNeoplastic proliferation of densely packed cells with round-to-oval or carrot-shaped hyperchromatic nuclei surrounded by scant cytoplasm. The tumor cells predominantly form sheets with vague areas of Homer-Wright rosettes. The vast majority of tumor cells show marked nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear molding, and cell-cell wrapping. Mitotic figures, including atypical ones, are readily identified. Numerous apoptotic bodies are noted. There is no evidence of nodularity.

Page 14: Case Study 36

Question 6What additional studies would you need to rule out other important differential diagnoses and confirm the final diagnosis in this case?

Page 15: Case Study 36

AnswerGFAP, INI-1, Synaptophysin, Neurofilament, EMA, CAM5.2, and Ki-67 (MIB-1).

Page 16: Case Study 36

Question 7What do you see on this GFAP immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 17: Case Study 36

AnswerGFAP is negative in tumor cells, and highlights occasional entrapped reactive astrocytes.

Page 18: Case Study 36

Question 8What do you see on this INI-1 immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 19: Case Study 36

AnswerINI-1 is strongly and diffusely positive in the nuclei of tumor cells.

Page 20: Case Study 36

Question 9What do you see on this Synaptophysin immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 21: Case Study 36

AnswerSynaptophysin is focally and weakly positive in tumor cells.

Page 22: Case Study 36

Question 10What do you see on this Neurofilament immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 23: Case Study 36

AnswerNeurofilament is negative in tumor cells.

Page 24: Case Study 36

Question 11What do you see on this EMA immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 25: Case Study 36

AnswerEMA is negative in tumor cells.

Page 26: Case Study 36

Question 12What do you see on this CAM5.2 immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 27: Case Study 36

AnswerCAM5.2 is negative in tumor cells.

Page 28: Case Study 36

Question 13What do you see on this Ki-67 (MIB-1) immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 29: Case Study 36

AnswerKi-67 (MIB-1) is positive in the nuclei of 40-50% of tumor cells.

Page 30: Case Study 36

Question 14What is your final diagnosis in this case?

Page 31: Case Study 36

AnswerAnaplastic/Large Cell Medulloblastoma.

Page 32: Case Study 36

Question 15What is the corresponding WHO grade of this lesion?

Page 33: Case Study 36

AnswerWHO Grade 4.

Page 34: Case Study 36

Question 16Which of the following cytogenetic abnormality is associated with this lesion?

A.t (1;13)

B.monosomy 22

C.i (17)q

D.22q-

E.t (1;13)

Page 35: Case Study 36

AnswerC. i (17)q