Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Running Head: CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 1
Case Study: Dimitrius, An English Language Learner
Lisa Engelsman
Michigan State University
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 2
Brief Background and Reason for Project Focus
Since I am not currently teaching, the process of identifying a struggling reader to work
with has been especially challenging. After contacting my son’s fourth grade teacher I was
finally directed to contact the building principal. To my delight the principal was very
encouraging and felt she could easily identify a student for me. After identifying a student that is
receiving English Language Learner (ELL) services at the school, the process of gaining
permission from the parent and passing on contact information to me was a several day process.
After more than a week of emails between the teacher, principal, and myself I was finally able to
meet with the mother of the identified child to explain my project to her.
From my conversation with the mom today her child appears to be a good candidate for
this project as she feels that he is struggling with reading as well as with his English language
development. He has two older siblings and the mom reports that the middle child doesn’t seem
to have the same struggles with reading and learning in English as her youngest son is having.
Mom also reports that he doesn’t enjoy reading and is having trouble making sense of English
spelling rules.
Home and Family
Dimitrius is an eight-year old boy currently in the third grade. According to personal
conversations with his classroom teacher and ELL teacher he is reading about a full grade level
below the standard for the end of third grade. I met with his mom on June 5 at their home to
introduce myself to her, explain the purpose of my project, and get her to sign the consent form.
The following evening, June 6, I returned to their home for an initial introduction to Dimitrius
and asked him to read aloud to me from several different books. One of the books Dimitrius was
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 3
particularly motivated to read to me from was Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Cabin Fever (Kinney,
2011). He was able to read the text, pausing occasionally to self-correct and decode; but his
reading was generally done word by word rather than in chunks or phrases. As a result his
reading wasn’t as fluid a typical child his age.
Dimitrius is from a Greek speaking immigrant family and they primarily speak Greek in
their home. While Dimitrius lived in the United States (U.S.) when he was preschooler and has
traveled back and forth between the U.S. and Greece quite frequently, this is Dimitrius’ first year
in an American public school. Mom reports that he began studying English in the Greek school
system during second grade and with their frequent travels he is not brand new to English.
Based on his English speaking proficiency and the primary use of Greek in the home he is
identified as an ELL student and receives regular assistance from an ELL teacher and a bilingual
paraprofessional at his school.
It was apparent being in this family’s home that reading is encouraged. There were lots
of books around – both adult and children’s reading were visible on the coffee table. The adult
books primarily were mom’s and were mostly centered on the theme of Greek Orthodoxy. From
my conversation with mom over the weeks I have worked with Dimitrius it does not appear that
she reads aloud to Dimitrius at all.
Dimitrius has two siblings; the oldest is a 13-year old girl who lives with her grandparents
in Greece. She spent her first two years of school in the same elementary school Dimitrius now
attends before mom and kids returned to Greece. Dimitrius also has a 10-year old brother who is
in fifth grade at a local upper elementary school. Dimitrius’ parents are both highly educated
and speak multiple languages. Dad is a neurologist at a hospital in the Detroit area and his
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 4
mother is currently a stay at home mom who runs a private school in Greece from her home here
in America. Mom is quite proficient in English – we had an engaging conversation about
religion, politics, parenting, etc. and the depth and breadth of her vocabulary was quite
impressive. Mom is an avid reader, which was apparent from the amount of books on the coffee
table and in the book shelves in the living room.
Emotional Climate
Since I don’t teach at Dimitrius’ school and none of my own children had his classroom
teacher, I really don’t have any way of knowing what the classroom learning environment is like.
The school as a whole is a warm, inviting place and from my brief meeting with his classroom
teacher to talk about his reading level she seemed to really care about Dimitrius and was excited
that someone else would have the chance to work with him. Dimitrius enjoys reading and seems
a little envious of his older brother who is reading much more difficult texts by Rick Riordan.
Literacy History
Dimitrius has entered American school with an advantage that many new immigrant
children do not have; he is reading on grade level in his first language (L1). While this gives
him a framework for learning to read and write in a new language, it also presents problems for
him in pronunciation and with his confidence level. Another particular challenge for him has to
do with his mom’s attitude toward English spelling. During my time with Dimitrius she often
repeated how English spelling doesn’t make any sense. While I have to agree with her that
English spelling is complicated, I’m afraid that saying this in front of Dimitrius serves to make
him feel that English spelling is just too hard and he cannot learn it.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 5
Tests Given and Summary of Test Results
In order to understand more about Dimitrius’ reading level I first talked with his English
Language Learner (ELL) teacher. She had recently completed an end of year reading assessment
using the Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System and had assessed Dimitrius as
reading at a Level L instructionally and a Level K independently (Fountas & Pinnell, n.d.). She
informed me that the goal in Farmington Public Schools is to have students reading at level O by
the end of third grade and Level L at the end of second grade, which places Dimitrius a full year
behind. After that conversation I wondered whether I would get similar results and so I
administered a running record Level L reading assessment (“Reading a-z Running Record Level
L,” n.d.). I also decided to use the Reading Attitude Survey (“Reading Attitude Survey,” n.d.)
to understand more about Dimitrius’ reading interests and after-school pursuits.
Because I have not administered a running record assessment before, I incorrectly
assumed that the Reading A-Z Assessment Tool and the Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark
Assessment System would use the same leveling system for their texts. So when assessing him
using Reading A-Z, I chose a Level L book, “Harold the Hungry Plant” by Harryman (n.d.), for
him to read to me. The running record in Appendix A demonstrates that Dimitrius’ accuracy
rate for the Level L text was 96%, his Error Rate was one error for every 23 words (1:23), and
his Self-Correction Rate was one error for every nine words (1:9). His accuracy rate was very
high, which would typically indicate that he is reading at the Level L independently, but
according to the Reading A-Z Assessment a self-correction rate of less than 1:4 indicates a child
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 6
is self-monitoring. The high rate of self-correction that Dimitrius demonstrated indicates some
difficulty with his self-monitoring (“Scoring and Analyzing a Running Record,” n.d.).
After Dimitrius read the running record selection aloud to me, we continued to read the
story. At first I asked him to read it silently, but then, as he became bored and distracted, I
suggested that we take turns reading the pages out loud. After we had finished reading the book
I used the Benchmark Quick Check (Appendix B) that went along with the story to analyze his
comprehension of the text. Dimitrius was able to answer three out of four text-based questions
correctly, two out of three inference type questions and only one out of three of the critical
response type of questions This gave him a total comprehension score of 60%. According to the
Benchmark Quick Check from the Reading A-Z program a comprehension score of 79% and
below indicates that the student is reading at their frustration level (“List of Benchmark Quick
Check Quizzes,” n.d.). While my results and his teacher’s results don’t correlate perfectly
according to the Reading A-Z Correlation Chart it is still fairly close. Considering my relative
inexperience with doing this kind of assessment it probably isn’t too surprising to have a slight
variation.
Another thing that I observed while listening to Dimitrius read is that, in general, his
reading lacks fluency. When thinking about fluency there are two important considerations:
automaticity and prosody. Prosody is the “melodic features of oral language, is that part of
fluency that completes the metaphorical bridge; it connects fluency to comprehension” (Rasinski
& Samuels, 2011, p. 96). There were occasional places where Dimitrius used expression, but
for the most part his reading sounded pretty flat. Another important component of fluency is
automaticity in word recognition; this “refers to the ability of readers to decode words not just
accurately but effortlessly or automatically” (Rasinski & Samuels, 2011, p. 95). It seems that
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 7
because Dimitrius was working so hard at decoding, his comprehension of the higher order
critical response and inference thinking didn’t take place. His lack of intonation in most of his
reading also seemed to indicate how hard he was working to decode.
Because Dimitrius did a lot of self-correcting when he was reading the passage it was
very apparent when he was really having trouble with a word. In particular there were a couple
of words he really struggled with; brought he managed to self-correct and caught he finally
asked for help on. Since both of these words have the variant vowel sound /Ô/ it is well worth
noting the difficulty he demonstrated with decoding these words.
The Reading Attitude Survey in Appendix B indicates that Dimitrius likes to read. In
particular he likes to read anything about Lego Ninjago – he said he would buy this kind of book
with his money – and he also said he likes to play with Legos. When asked about the difference
between home and school reading he said that at home he can read what he wants to read, but at
school reading is work. As a side note on his attitudes about reading, it came up that he is
embarrassed about reading aloud. He knows he doesn’t sound fluent. Since I was recording his
reading, I asked him if he wanted to hear it. He did, but after I played it for him and asked him
how he liked hearing his voice he repeated that it didn’t sound good and he felt embarrassed. I
also discovered that, like most other children, he loves to play on the iPad; in fact, getting a few
minutes to play a game on my iPad at the end of our session ended up being a motivating factor
for him to stick with me through the assessments.
Based on my time with Dimitrius and assessments I have decided to work on two things
in particular with him: reading fluency and words that use the variant vowel /Ô/ sound
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 8
combinations. As an ELL component I would also like to work on his pronunciation of the word
“April” to see if we can make progress in that word sounding more native-like.
Lesson Plan Matrix
Lesson Foci/Date
Improving Fluency,
Tuesday, June 11
Objectives Instructional materials On-going assessment
Reading Level
Assessment (6/6/13)
Improving Fluency:
June 11 & June 13
Approximately 30-45
minutes each time.
Student will improve his
self-correction rate and
comprehension level
while reading a Level L
text from Reading A-Z.
Common Core Standards
Grade 2 Fluency
Standard 4.a,b,c
Text: The Best Teacher
in the World by Bernice
Chardiet and Grace
Maccarone
Running Record
Reading A-Z Level L
text, “The Gray Wolf”.
Lesson Foci/Date
Objectives Instructional materials On-going assessment
Vowel Recognition
June 18
Student will
automatically recognize
and correctly pronounce
ou(ght) and au
(ght)vowel
combinations.
Common Core
Standards
Grade 2 Phonics and
Word Recognition
Standard 3b
Individual flash cards
with ou, ght, f,s,b,th,s
and au, ght, c, t
teacher created short
story using these vowel
combinations
Word sort
Observation over the
lesson of student’s
recall of words using
this combination.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 9
Reflections on My Differentiated Literacy Lesson Plan
The two lessons I taught to my student were spread out over four days – with two
sessions for each lesson. The first lesson focused on increasing Dimitrius’ reading fluency using
Martin and the Tooth Fairy (Chardiet & Maccarone, 1990). The running record I had
completed with Dimitrius (Appendix A) showed that he is fairly good at self-correcting, but
because he isn’t reading with automaticity with many words his reading lacks fluency and
expression. One of the first things Dimitrius and I worked on was setting a base line reading rate
for a passage from our chosen text. Then over the course of our four sessions Dimitrius re-read
the passage and I marked errors and how far he made it through the passage (Appendix F). Each
time he read the passage his reading become more fluent and had more expression as evidenced
by the sound recordings I made. Dimitrius also enjoyed the visual effect of plotting his reading
rate growth on the graph in Appendix G.
During the fourth and final reading, however, things began to break down. While he read
further in the passage than he did before, in his eagerness to improve his rate again he skipped
words and parts of sentences. So while he read further through the text than he did the other
three times, his accuracy decreased. This outcome seems to support Rasinski and Samuels
assertion that “a reader can actually be disfluent by reading too fast, at a speed that does not
reflect comprehension or that gives evidence that the reader is not attending to the meaning of
the text” (2011, p. 97). It seems a potential downfall of tracking the reading rate on a graph as
we did is that it can create too much incentive to read quickly at the expense of expression and
comprehension.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 10
When I began meeting with Dimitrius I knew that he was an English Language Learner
(ELL) and that this was a contributing factor for him not meeting benchmarks for third grade
reading. What I wasn’t sure about were the types of interventions I would need to consider
trying to assist him with his English proficiency. During the initial assessment screening I
completed with Dimitrius I noticed that throughout the text when he came to the name of the girl
in the story, “April”, he consistently mispronounced (Appendix A)i. There was such a
consistency to his pronunciation with hardly any hesitation that the more I thought about it the
more curious I became.
My curiosity drove me to access Google Translate for an answer. Google Translate is a
unique tool that allow you to put in an English word, select the language you want the word
translated into, and then actually listen to the word pronounced in that language. When I put
“April” into Google Translate the initial sounds of the Greek pronunciation were exactly the
same as how Dimitrius was pronouncing it. At our next lesson I pointed out his pronunciation
error and had him practice saying it with correct English pronunciation. This happened again
when we began to read Martin and the Tooth Fairy. Dimitrius mispronounced the word “model”
and upon investigating the Greek pronunciation of this word I determined that his English
pronunciation was being influenced by the Greek pronunciation. This word was included in the
words we used to play the matching game in Lesson 1 (Appendix D). When we first began
practicing and playing the game he had a hard time remembering the English pronunciation, but
as we moved through the two sessions of Lesson 1 he was able to monitor his pronunciation of
the word before he started to read it.
Another minor issue I encountered was related to vocabulary. For the most part
Dimitrius understood all of the words we read, but I didn’t anticipate words he might not be
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 11
familiar with. Most of the time I was able to give an example or short explanation and he
understood it. But when we were working on the / Ô/ sound I didn’t foresee that he wouldn’t
know the meaning for “moss”. I tried to verbally explain it “as something green that grows in
cool, shady areas under trees”. He still didn’t understand what it was, but I was quickly able to
fix that by taking a break to go outside and find some moss in his backyard.
A third minor problem that came up was during the first day of Lesson 2. As we were
going to be talking about word families as part of the lesson I wanted to make sure he knew what
a word family was. I used /ow/ as my example and we talked about the words cow, now, plow
as being part of this word family. The problem came when we started to read the story that went
with the lesson, A Crow with Flaws. We immediately had a problem as the word crow appears
to belong to the same word family as cow and now, but in reality it doesn’t. I should have
anticipated this and I should have figured out a way to come back to it in our next lesson.
Like most boys his age Dimitrius loves to play with any electronic game. Since I had my
iPad along to record his reading, he asked if he could play it. It became quite evident that
anything I could do that was more kinesthetic in nature would help him focus. Based on this
understanding I chose several of my activities to involve more than just reading and/or writing.
By using the matching game, bingo, and the vowel cups that he could manipulate I was able to
keep him engaged and focused.
Overall, I was pleased how my time with Dimitrius went. I believe that his confidence
grew as he tracked his reading rate on the graph and heard himself improve on the voice
recordings I made. As we worked on the difficult words from each text, playing games and re-
reading the texts his automaticity improved and he wasn’t struggling to decode as many of the
words. I also heard more expression in his later readings. I definitely didn’t anticipate some of
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 12
the small issues that came along the way, but do believe that this kind of foresight is partially a
result of experience. At the end of our time together Dimitrius wanted to know if I could
continue to work with him this summer. I’m excited to have the opportunity to do this over this
summer and continue my own learning about literacy.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 13
Recommendations to Teachers and Parents
Dear Parents,
Dimitrius is a bright child and it has been a pleasure to work with him over these last
weeks. It is obvious that he enjoys reading and desires to improve his reading so that he will be
able to read the interesting books he sees his big brother reading. Dimitrius and I discovered
together that he is very good at self-correcting when he makes mistakes in his reading and when
reading a text that is at his level his comprehension is pretty good. From my time with Dimitrius
it was obvious that he does not like the way he sounds when he reads aloud because his reading
doesn’t sound fluid and natural to him. Considering the short time that he has been in school in
America, this is not surprising. Nevertheless he feels embarrassed about it and this detracts from
his enjoyment of reading.
Dimitrius and I worked on two specific areas in our lessons together. First we focused on
his reading fluency which has to do with how fast he reads and the use of expression in reading.
Although he self-corrects often when he makes errors, because he doesn’t automatically
recognize a lot of words his reading is choppy. In order to help with this we identified words in
the book we read together that were difficult, practiced those words, and read the passage
multiple times. Secondly we worked on the /Ô/ vowel sound that appears in words like caught,
thought, loss, song, and law. In particular Dimitrius had trouble recognizing the augh/ough
combinations and so we practiced recognizing these words automatically.
As we enter the summer months it is important for Dimitrius to continue to read
regularly. One key to developing his fluency and expression is just reading a lot. He would
benefit from regularly scheduling in 20 minutes of reading time each day. He should choose
books that are “just right” for him, meaning that he can read them with relative ease. It would be
great for him to read these books both aloud and multiple times as this will help his reading rate,
his automatic word recognition, his expression, and will ultimately make him feel better about
reading aloud.
Thank you for allowing me to work with your son!
Sincerely,
Lisa Engelsman
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 14
REFERENCES
Chardiet, B., & Maccarone, G. (1990). Martin and the Tooth Fairy. New York: Scholastic, Inc.
Ellingson, S. (n.d.). Middle Sound Cups - and How to Teach Kids to Find the Middle Sound of a
Word. Heidi Songs Classroom Resources. Retrieved from
http://heidisongs.blogspot.com/2013/04/middle-sound-cups-and-how-to-teach-kids.html
Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. S. (n.d.). Fountas & Pinnell Leveled Books Website. Retrieved from
http://www.fountasandpinnellleveledbooks.com/aboutFountasPinnell.aspx
Harryman, W. (n.d.). Harry the Hungry Plant. Reading A-Z. Retrieved from
http://www.readinga-z.com/book.php?id=677
Kinney, J. (2011). Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Cabin Fever. New York: Amulet Books.
List of Benchmark Quick Check Quizzes. (n.d.). Reading A-Z. Retrieved from
http://www.readinga-z.com/book/benchmark-quiz.php?context=guided-
reading&f=site_and_dist/bench_quiz/l/raz_bmqll_00_f.pdf
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School
Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards English Language Arts. National
Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School
Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards
Rasinski, T. V., & Samuels, S. J. (2011). Reading Fluency: What It Is and What It Is Not. In
What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction. Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Reading a-z Running Record Level L. (n.d.). Reading A-Z. Retrieved from http://www.readinga-
z.com/book.php?id=677&f=members/runningrecords/raz_llrr_02.pdf
Roberts, B. (n.d.). A Crow with Flaws. Reading A-Z.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 15
Scoring and Analyzing a Running Record. (n.d.). Reading A-Z. Retrieved from
http://www.readinga-z.com/assess/scoring-a-running-record.html?context=guided-
reading
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 16
Appendix A
Running Record A-Z – Martin and the Tooth Fairy
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 17
Appendix B
Reading A-Z Benchmark Quick Check for Dimitrius
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 18
Appendix C
Reading Attitude Survey
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 19
Appendix D
Lesson Plan #1
Date: 06/11 & 6/13
Objective(s) for today’s lesson: Student will increase reading fluency rate of selected passage
and will read with increased prosody.
“Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.” CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RF.2.4.a
“Read grade-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive
readings.” CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RF.2.4b
“Use context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and understanding, rereading as
necessary.” CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RF.2.4.c
Rationale: Two components of reading fluency that go along with reading comprehension are
automaticity in word recognition and prosody. Students struggling with word recognition will
struggle with prosody which will ultimately affect comprehension.
Materials & supplies needed: My Reading Fluency Graph, colored pencils, reading fluency
graph, copy of Martin and the Tooth Fairy, flashcards
Procedures and approximate time allocated for each event
• Introduction to the lesson
Teacher: Today and tomorrow we will be working on
reading more fluently. This means we will work on you
being able to see a word and know exactly what it is
quickly. It also means that we will work on reading with
expression. Do you know what that means? It means
that when we read out loud we change the tone of our
voice, how loud we read, and speed based on what we
are reading. Remember how you said you felt
embarrassed to listen to the recording of your voice in
last week? This is because you didn’t think it sounded
good. So we are going to practice making your out-loud
reading sound better using a book called Martin and the
Tooth Fairy (3 minutes)
• Outline of key events during the lesson
Teacher: Last time I said that if you worked hard with
Academic, Social and
Linguistic Support during
each event
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 20
me during our reading lessons I would give you time to
play on my iPad at the end of our lesson. Is that a deal?
(shake hands on it). We are going to work hard for
about ½ hour and then I will give you time to play for 10
minutes. After that time I will ask you to read one last
short passage before we end today.
1. Activate background knowledge (3 minutes)
a. T: We are going to work on reading this story this
week.
b. T: Ask student: What is a tooth fairy? Has the
tooth fairy ever visited you?
2. Reading rate (2 minutes)
a. T: One thing we are going to do several times
today and at our next meeting is to see how much
of this story you can read to me in 1 minute. When
we are done I will have you put that number on a
graph. As we practice reading this book, you will
see your ability to read the words quickly and
accurately increase.
b. Have student read as much of the story out loud to me
in 1 minute as he can. Mark errors on teacher sheet.
Quickly calculate reading rate. Have student graph it
on the “My Reading Fluency Graph”.
c. Model Fluent Reading (10 minutes)
a. T: Now I am going to read this story to you. As I
read I want you to pay attention to how my voice
changes as I read. Good oral readers use their
voice to help tell the story. Read out loud paying
special attention to reading with expression.
3. Vocabulary Practice (10 minutes)
a. T: There are some difficult words in the story.
Let’s take some time to read these difficult words
together and practice recognition of them. (usual,
tongue, wiggled, finish, supposed, pillow, beard,
quarters, model, mumbled)
b. Flashcards: Have students read the words that are
written on flashcards (2 cards for each word). Help
with pronunciation and sounding out as needed. Mix
the cards up and practice reading several more times.
c. Matching Game: Mix up flashcards. Lay them out
ELL – show picture of tooth fairy
and talk about what a tooth fairy
does to make sure he knows the
meaning
Pay attention to student’s
pronunciation correcting the
most obvious mispronunciations.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 21
face down on the table in a random order. Student
turns over one card and reads the word out loud.
Repeats with a second card. If they match students
takes the two cards. Teacher goes second. Repeat
until all cards are matched.
4. Guided Reading: (10 minutes)
a. T: Now we are going to practice reading the story
aloud together. I want you to follow along with
your finger as we read. Adjust pace of voice to
allow student to read along with me.
b. Reading Rate/Short Assessment: (3 minutes) Repeat
the reading rate assessment used above to see if
student’s reading rate improves with this passage.
Student charts it on the graph.
5. Comprehension Questions: (5 minutes) Check
comprehension of story by asking the following questions:
a. What did Martin do with his tooth at night after it fell
out?
b. How many quarters did he get for his tooth?
c. Why did Martin make a sign at lunchtime?
d. Why did Raymond want more than 2 quarters for his
tooth?
e. What did Martin do to get his money back from his
friends?
• Closing summary for the lesson (3 minutes)
1. Record student reading the first 4 pages of the story
again. Listen to the reading and point out areas where
his reading sounds more fluent.
2. T: The more you can practice reading out loud and
in your head the easier you will find it to read more
fluently.
T: Part of being able to read more fluently and understand
what you are reading is being able to recognize the words
quickly. Remember how we practiced some of the difficult
words in this story with the matching game? In our next
lesson we will practice some words that have the variant
vowel /Ô/ spellings – words like “caught” and “bought”.
These words can be a little tricky so we will do some
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 22
activities to become more familiar with these words.
Assessment: From this lesson I’m looking for:
1. More expression from pre-test recording to post-test
recording.
2. Increased reading rate for selected passage
3. When asked, Dimitrius says that he feels better about
hearing the latest recording of himself reading out loud.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 23
Appendix E
Lesson Plan #2
Date: 06/19 & 06/20
Objective(s) for today’s lesson:
1. The student will read words that belong to the variant vowel /Ô/ word family accurately and
with automaticity.
2. Student will increase reading fluency rate of selected passage and will read with increased
prosody. (This is carried over from our first two lessons.)
“Know spelling-sound correspondences for additional common vowel teams. CCSS.ELA-
Literacy.RF.2.3.b
“Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.” CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RF.2.4.a
“Read grade-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive
readings.” CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RF.2.4b
“Use context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and understanding, rereading as
necessary.” CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RF.2.4.c
Rationale: The student struggles with decoding and recognizing words with /Ô/ and in
particular words like thought, bought, caught. Not being able to easily decode and recognize
these words leads to a breakdown in comprehension as he struggles to figure out the
pronunciation. It also interferes with his expression while reading.
Materials & supplies needed: Middle Sound Cups, word family cards, iPad, copy of Martin
and the Tooth Fairy, Vowel Pattern Bingo cards, pennies,
• Introduction to the lesson (3 minutes)
T: In our last lesson we talked about how recognizing
words right away when you see them helps us to with
understand what we are reading. If we have to think
really hard about sounding out a word, it is hard to pay
attention to what the text is saying. The first time you
read for me I noticed that words like “taught” and
“thought” were difficult for you (show cards with words
on them). In our next two lessons we will practice
recognizing these words quickly. We will also reread
our passage from Martin and the Tooth Fairy once today
and once tomorrow to work on increasing your reading
rate and improve how you sound reading out loud.
Academic, Social and Linguistic
Support during each event
/Ô/ Words
bought, caught, toss, song,
law, call
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 24
• Outline of key events during the lesson:(adapted from
Reading A-Z, Phonics Lesson 62)
1. Activate background knowledge (3 minutes)
T: Do you know what a word family is? If he doesn’t
remember start with an easy combination like /ow/ and the
word cow. Write cow on a piece of paper and point to the
/ow/ part of the word. Words that end with the /ow/ like
in cow are in the same word family. Can you think of
other words that would belong to this family? Write
down words students comes up with.
2. Introduce /Ô/ (5 minutes)
a. In order to practice recognizing the various letter
combinations/words that make up the /Ô/ sound I’ve
decided to use an approach to put the words/sounds
together that uses a series of clear and colored cups
(CVC Cups). The colored cups have the medial vowels
written on them. The clear cups (which are bigger than
the colored cups have the possible letters that could be
on either side of the vowels to create a word. In order to
create a full word the student can choose a colored cup
vowel and then place a clear cup over the colored cup.
The letter written on the two different cups now spell a
word (Ellingson, n.d.).
b. Create the word ball with the cups. Have student read
word aloud. Take off the clear cup and have student
make the sound that the letter a makes.
c. Create the words caught and ball with the cups. Ask
student what is similar about the sounds in the middle of
these two words.
d. T: The augh is a letter combination that stands for a
group of vowels called variant vowels. (show
combination with appropriate cup) They don’t follow
the normal rules you may have learned. Another
group of letter combinations that make this sound is
ough. (show combination with appropriate cup).
e. Create the word brought with the cups. Point out the
letter combination that stands for the variant vowel and
run finger over vowel combination while saying sound.
Blend the entire word while running finger over each
letter. Point out to student that the word has four
sounds, but 7 letters make up those sounds.
f. Repeat the blending activity with different word
Now, plow,
Student really enjoys anything
kinesthetic and I think this will be
more engaging than just looking
at the words on paper.
.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 25
combinations (broth, moth, moss, and taught).
3. Blend onset and rime (10 minutes)
a. Place aught word-family card on the table in front of
student. Ask him what sound these letters make. Place
c card in front of aught. Have student read the word,
blending the sounds and using their finger to follow
along. Repeat with letter t.
b. Take out oss card. Repeat the procedure from aught and
use the t and b cards to create words toss and boss.
c. Repeat with ought. Use the b and s cards.
d. Repeat with ong. Use the s and l cards.
e. Repeat with aw. Use the l and c cards.
f. Place the word family cards in a row. Have student sort
word cards into their proper category based on their
spelling of the /Ô/ sound.
4. Reading Story with /Ô/ sound. (10 minutes)
a. Show front cover of book. Have student read title. T:
What do you think this story might be about?”
b. Ask student to point out variant spelling in the title.
c. Have student read “A Crow with Flaws” aloud (Roberts,
n.d.).
5. Practice putting words together using cups. Call out
words and have student use colored and clear cups to
create the words I call out. (5 minutes)
6. Create words using the cups and have student call them
out as quickly as possible.
7. Reread practice passage from Martin and the Tooth
Fairy.
8. Vowel Pattern Bingo (10 minutes)
a. Teacher and student play Vowel Pattern Bingo. Place
bingo card in front of both student and teacher.
b. Place cards with words on them upside down between
student and teacher.
c. Take turns turning over card and marking board with
pennies. When card is turned over ask student to read
the word aloud.
d. Play several rounds of this together.
9. Spell and Write (5 minutes)
a. Dictate words and have student write.
b. caught, taught, cost, floss, bought, thought
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 26
10. Final reading from Martin and the Tooth Fairy. Have
student read the passage one last time. Record reading
using the iPad. Calculate his reading rate in one minute
and have student graph the results on graph. Point out to
student the growth in his reading rate over the last two
weeks. T: When we practice reading a lot our ability
to recognize the words quickly and accurately goes up.
As we become more familiar with the words we can
add more expression to our voice as we read. As we
recognize words quickly and without thinking we can
focus on the meaning of the story. You have worked
hard in these last two weeks and your reading of this
passage sounds a lot better!
Assessment: From this lesson I’m looking for:
1. More expression from pre-test recording to post-test
recording of selected passage from Martin and the
Tooth Fairy.
2. Increased reading rate for selected passage
3. Student expresses greater satisfaction with how his
reading sounds.
4. Student will be able to quickly put the sounds together
with the cups to spell the words and he will be able to
write the variant /Ô/ words accurately.
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 27
Appendix F
Running Record for Martin and the Tooth Fairy
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 28
Appendix G
Dimitrius’ Reading Rate Graph
CASE STUDY: DIMITRIUS 29
i Appendix H is attached separately and is a voice recording of Dimitrius reading Harry the Hungry Plant. If you listen you will hear his mispronunciation of April.