Upload
gagan15095895
View
36
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
mature parenting of companies case study
Citation preview
Punjab College of Technical Education
ASSIGNMENT ON CASE STUDY
Submitted To: Submitted By:
Mr. V.P Mishra Gagandeep Kaur
M.B.A 2B
This case study, presented to us, is of a diversified company Sargon Corporation. Jack Marlowe,
President Sargon Corporation, is grappling with the most intractable problem he has ever dealt while
in the company. The problems he is facing are as below;
1. What to do about Arcell Corporation, its household-appliances unit?
2. What to do about Charlie Crescent, Arcell’s president?
Sargon is counting on Arcell to provide a lion’s share of the money for the company’s investment in
future. Marlowe has made it clear that company wants Arcell to run lean and mean and every time
Crescent has said that he understands. He keeps wanting to plow his profits back into Arcell.
Some facts about the company;
a) Sargon Corporation is a diversified manufacturer of brake systems, components for
telecommunications equipment and voice recognition systems, and its recent acquisition;
manufacturer of routers and hubs for corporate network.
b) Sargon was formerly a small defense contractor but due to contraction of profits in the said
business, it diversified into household appliances (early 1970s)to break systems to components for
telecommunications equipment( Hestnes launched in 1983)to voice recognition systems for the
security industry ( a 1989 acquisition).
c) Charlie Crescent took over the Appliances unit two years earlier and soon after the takeover
started a major consolidation and cost cutting drive that raised the operating margins from 2% to 7%.
d) Sargon recently acquired Cyberam, a maker of routers and hubs for corporate networks. The deal
met with virtually no applauds outside Sargon headquarters.
Alternatives
Marlowe should stop playing the balanced-portfolio game. He should stop expecting all of Sargon’s
mature businesses to act simply as cash generators and all of its new businesses to grow quickly
When Crescent wants to invest more into new products, new facilities and new markets, Marlowe
and Hestnes should not turn down the proposal just because their other businesses need cash. Rather,
they should encourage and support the investment if the proposals are sound.
if Marlowe is convinced that the new investments will lead to greater margins there is no reason why
Sargon should not invest in Arcell. But on the other hand if Marlowe decides that Crescent is over
optimistic about what can be achieved, he should clearly explain to the Arcell management why they
will not be getting the funding they want.
Right now Marlowe is probably unsure about the quality of Arcell’s investment proposals. If so, he
needs to invest some time with the business in order to form an opinion. Also, Marlowe must
persuade Hestnes to reconsider Sargon’s corporate level strategy.
Hestnes’s judgement is clouded by his preference for high-tech products and by the fact that Arcell
was established before his appointment as chairman of Sargon. Right now Marlowe and Hestnes are
considering Crescent as the problem rather than considering Sargon functions vis-à-vis its business
sectors’ roles and goals.
First, he needs to decide what type of company he wants to see Sargon to be moulding into? Does he
want to mould it into a pure portfolio company, whose primary purpose is generating cash by buying
and selling businesses? In that case they need to remove themselves from managerial issues at the
division. Or do they want Sargon to be a value
added parent, making whole greater than the sum of its parts by managing the organization’s core
competencies and creating synergies among its various divisions?
What do they want to extract out of Arcell? Are they planning to drain Arcell quickly and sell it later
or invest in it and milk it over time? They need to decide that even if Arcell is a cash cow for Sargon
why can’t they invest in the cash cow and make it an engine for growth? For this to happen they need
to give Crescent more than 10 minutes in the meeting to understand completely the investment
proposals and if they find those good enough to meet the company’s investment criteria they why not
churn the requisite growth from here and not invest more time and money finding new businesses
that not even fit their current portfolio of companies. This would also help in reducing the current
tension between the two.
And even after the discussions if it turns out that Arcell really should be managed as a no-growth,
low-cost operation then if Crescent then refuses to recognize that this is the best strategy for the unit
– and he must be given every opportunity to argue that growth is the correct option – replacing him
becomes a possibility. Having said that, after seeing the track record of Crescent, replacing him
would be to sacrifice to a misguided corporate strategy someone who might be a great manager.
They should think about the intrinsic benefit of the company’s different business and they could find
out how Sargon as a corporate parent can add the most value to each of them.
Collective Bargaining can be one alternative
Selling up of one unit for getting funds can be one of the options