5
Case Study Summary August 18, 2016 ® All of the original supporting data is available in the original Case Study, Test Data Spreadsheet (Appendix 1), and Picture & Video PowerPoint (Appendix 2).

Case Study Summary - לוגיה מערכות

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Case Study Summary

August 18, 2016

®

All of the original supporting data is available in the original Case Study, Test Data Spreadsheet (Appendix 1), and Picture & Video PowerPoint (Appendix 2).

Primary experiment: Dust emissions were routinely measured on treated and untreated roads over a 30-day period. The concentration of dust on the treated roads was compared to the concentration of dust on comparable untreated roads in order to determine dust suppression efficiency. • Resinator applied at a dilution of 1:4 with water and an application rate of 0.47 gallons of the diluted solution per

square yard, yielding an application rate of 0.094 gallons of undiluted Resinator per square yard.• >500 vehicle passes per day: residential, commercial, construction, and agricultural

• DUST REDUCTION RESULTS: DAY 1: 99%, DAY 14: 96.75%, DAY 23: 96.35%, AND DAY 30: 95.8%

Secondary experiment: Dust emissions were collected from the rear of a test vehicle driven over the treated roads and the untreated roads. The particulate matter was weighed and compared in order to determine the reduction in dust emissions between the treat roads and the untreated roads.• DUST REDUCTION RESULTS: DAY 1: 73.3%, DAY 14: 95.0%, DAY 23: 96.8%, AND DAY 30: 95.9%

Conclusion: Momar’s Resinator is an effective dust control agent that easily meets the performance statement:

“MOMAR’S RESINATOR REDUCES DUST EMISSION BY A MINIMUM OF 90% DURING 10,000+ VEHICLE PASSES

OVER A 30-DAY PERIOD.”

Case Study

2

Conducted by independent 3rd party, Merton Consulting, Lou Koenig, Principal Scientist8383 Kenilworth Ave. Parma, Ohio 44129 ● 440-503-9570 ● [email protected] on roads in the Parkman Township of Ohio during the months of August – October, 2016

Case Study

3

Conducted by independent 3rd party, Merton Consulting, Lou Koenig, Principal Scientist8383 Kenilworth Ave. Parma, Ohio 44129 ● 440-503-9570 ● [email protected] on roads in the Parkman Township of Ohio during the months of August – October, 2016

Video of traffic on the UNTREATED road Video of traffic on the TREATED road

Application

Truck → →

Case Study

4

Conducted by independent 3rd party, Merton Consulting, Lou Koenig, Principal Scientist8383 Kenilworth Ave. Parma, Ohio 44129 ● 440-503-9570 ● [email protected] on roads in the Parkman Township of Ohio during the months of August – October, 2016

UNTREATED TREATED

Case Study

5

Conducted by independent 3rd party, Merton Consulting, Lou Koenig, Principal Scientist8383 Kenilworth Ave. Parma, Ohio 44129 ● 440-503-9570 ● [email protected] on roads in the Parkman Township of Ohio during the months of August – October, 2016

UNTREATED TREATED