Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Casemix and DRG
บุญชัย กิจสนาโยธิน MD., PhD. (Health Informatics) ศูนย์พัฒนามาตรฐานระบบข้อมูลสุขภาพไทย ศมสท. THIS
สถาบันวิจัยระบบสาธารณสุข
Thai Health Informatics Academy Seminar ครั้งที่ 8/2555
13 ธันวาคม 2555
Casemix system development in a resource limited country
Supasit Pannarunothai
Centre for Health Equity Monitoring
Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University
Definition of DRG and Casemix
Diagnosis related group (DRG) Fetter et al 1980
Patient classification system for acute inpatients
Iso-resource group (lengths of stay, cost)
Used in the US prospective payment system (PPS)
Casemix
More generic term of patient classification systems
Covers all modes of care
Principle of iso-resource group
Diagnosis Related Group is a patient
classification system for acute inpatients to
measure hospital output. Patients in the same
DRGs will have the same lengths of stay and
the same level of hospital resource uses
What is DRG?
ระบบข้อมูลของกองทุนประกันสุขภาพต่างๆ
ระบบข้อมูลของ สปสช.
eClaim
Disease Management IS : NAP, DM, PPIS
OP individual etc.
ระบบข้อมูลของกรมบัญชีกลาง
ระบบข้อมูลของประกันสังคม
ระบบข้อมูลของพรบ.อุบัตเิหต ุ
DRG and alternative payment mechanisms
The Movement to Inclusive Payment
FinancialRisk
Cost Item Per
Diem
Per
CaseEpisode Capitation
Provider
Payor
Unit of Payment
% of
Premium
DRGs CRGs
Time 3MHIS 2001
Payment methods and risk distribution
Retrospective
Full cost
Discount
per diem Hospital
IP DRGs
IP and
OP
DRGs
Bundled
Hospital -
MD DRGs
Full
Capitation
Minimum Maximum Provider Risk
Per
Discharged Per
member
เคร่ืองมือการเงินประกนัสุขภาพ
สมดลุของการจา่ยชดเชย = ประสทิธภิาพ
ประสทิธผิลการรักษา
คา่ใชจ้า่ยสขุภาพ
CaseMix
Fee schedule
History of Thai DRG developments
1993 started research on Accident & Emergency DRG (N = 100 DRGs)
1995 researched on all patient DRG (500 DRGs)
1999 additional payment to hospitals for high cost low income inpatients (DRG RW>3)
2003 DRG version 3 (1,200 DRGs) payment to all hospitals (including teaching hospitals) by NHSO
2010 DRG version 5 is to be released (covers acute, subacute and psychiatric cases)
Allocation of DRG General principle Major
Diagnostic
Category
OR Procedure
DRG
Principal
Diagnosis ICD10
ICD9CM
Secondary Diagnoses
Age Discharge type
Version Refined Diagnosis
code
Procedure
code Groups Implement
1 No ICD-10 (WHO)
1992 ICD-9-CM
2000 511 Nov 1998
2 No ICD-10 (WHO)
1992 ICD-9-CM
2000 511 Feb 2001
3
3.0 5 levels
ICD-10 (WHO) 1992
ICD-9-CM
2000 1,283 Oct 2003
3.1 5 levels ICD-10 (WHO)
1992 ICD-9-CM
2000 1,283 Apr 2005
3.3 5 levels ICD-10 (WHO)
2005 ICD-9-CM
2005 1,283 Feb 2006
3.5 5 levels ICD-10 (WHO)
2005 ICD-9-CM 2005 1,467 -
4 5 levels
ICD-10 (WHO)
2007 + ICD-10-TM*
ICD-9-CM
2007
with extension
1,920 Oct 2007
Thai DRGs
* Thai Modification for data entry only (not for new classification)
Important features of Thai DRG
Adapt to Thai health care environments
Change from the US-DRG to AN-DRG for
more details on severity of illness
High practicality
Reclassification
Recalibration
How DRGs are calculated?
DRG Grouper
Diagnosis
ICD 10
Procedures
ICD 9 CM
Age
Sex
Discharge
status
Length of Stay (LOS)
DRGs
Co-morbidities
RW Adj RW
14
Data needed for DRG system
Classification Diagnosis : Principle and Secondary Diagnosis Age Gender Procedure performed: Type of Discharge
Calibration Cost/Charge
How DRGs code look like?
DRG DRG Descriptions RW n %
15540 Newb adm wt >2499 gm wo CC 0.1699 84 6.53
06580 Gastroenteritis age < 10, no CC 0.2196 72 5.59
14500 Vaginal delivery wo complicating Dx 0.3652 45 3.5
14010 Caesarean delivery wo complicating Dx 1.3938 36 2.8
15541 Newb adm wt >2499 gm w other CC 0.4172 34 2.64
16500 Red Blood Cell Disorders, no CC 0.3368 30 2.33
02070 Other lens procedures, no CC 1.2643 29 2.25
04520 Respiratory infection/inflammation, no CC 0.6156 22 1.71
06070 Appendectomy, no CC 1.3054 22 1.71
04550 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
no CC
0.6958 21 1.63
16 Srisangworn hospital data (Dec 2007)
Spectrum of Healthcare services
Preventive care
Ambulatory Care
Urgent& Emergency
Care
Acute care
Subacute care
Chronic care Home care Hospice
care
Success factors of Thai DRG
Continuous research grants (mostly domestic funds)
International inputs (study visits, experts)
Champions (financing, coding, programming, audit)
Opportunity on cost containment, efficiency
Information technology (cheaper, integrated network and faster)
Involving teaching hospitals in the public hearing processes
Cautions and limitations
Accuracy of coding data
Accuracy of cost data
Logics for calibration
Data library for each Major Diagnostic Category
Human resource: competency and number
Financing policy: global cap
Casemix Groupers
TDRG 5.0 Grouper
TSNAP 1.0 Grouper
TMHC 2.0 Grouper
All Patients
Grouper Manager
From: Zungsonthiporn 2008
Thai-Mental Health Casemix – TMHC
Thai-Subacute Nonacute Patient – TSNAP
Thai-Diagnosis Related Group - TDRG
Casemix Grouper
- PDx as defined - Basic data as for TDRG - Additional data + HoNOS
TMHC 2.0 Classification
Health of the Nation Outcome Scale - HoNOS
Principal Diagnosis - PDx
Thai-Mental Health Casemix – TMHC
Thai-Diagnosis Related Group - TDRG From: Zungsonthiporn 2008
Casemix Grouper
- PDx as defined - Basic data as for TDRG - Additional data + Modified Barthel Index + MMSE + Transfer Date
TSNAP 1.0 Classification
Mini-Mental State Examination - MMSE
Thai-Subacute Nonacute Patient – TSNAP
Thai-Diagnosis Related Group - TDRG Zungsonthiporn 2008
Lesson learnt
Short cut start by the classification and calibration using data from x hospitals
Focus on hospitals that have already keyed in clinical data of all patients with billing data
Critical success factors include:
Human resource factors
Data pooling power
Involvement of key players at the beginning
Case mix complexity
Severity of Illness
Risk of Mortality
Prognosis
Treatment Difficulty.
Need for Intervention
Resource Intensity
24