67
broiler farm BALLARTO ROAD CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2014

CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN€¦ · 2.1 Vision Casey Fields South Residential Precinct occupies an area of approximately 110 ha in the City of Casey

  • Upload
    dotruc

  • View
    224

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

precinct boundaryresidentialconvenience centreproposed regional Casey Fields

developmentlocal passive open space (encumbered)

drainage open space (encumbered)broiler farm recommended

separation distance 288mprimary arterial road (6 lanes)secondary arterial road (4 lanes)

connector roadaccess level 1

access level 2 - Casey Fields interfaceaccess level 2 - green link

future urbanexisting urban

rail line

plan 2_future urban structurecasey �elds south precinct structure plan

1:10,000 @ A4

800600

400200

0

1,000

V140227

broiler farm

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD.

BALLARTO ROAD

CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2014

CRA

NBO

URN

EEA

ST P

RECI

NCT

TO D

AN

DEN

ON

GTO

NA

RRE

WA

RREN

TO B

ERW

ICK

&PR

INCE

S FR

EEW

AY

TO T

OO

RAD

IN &

WES

TERN

PO

RT

1:50

,000

@ A

4

800

400

020

00

V140

227

loca

l con

text

case

y �e

lds

sout

h pr

ecin

ct s

truc

ture

pla

n

Prec

inct

Str

uctu

re P

lan

Are

a

Railw

ay L

ine

& E

xist

ing

Stat

ion

Maj

or R

oad

Net

wor

k

Act

ivity

Cen

tre

Gre

en W

edge

Lan

d

Futu

re U

rban

Are

a

Exis

ting

Urb

an A

rea

Educ

atio

n/Co

mm

unity

Fac

ilitie

s

Sign

i�ca

nt O

pen

Spac

e

O’S

HEA

RD

C21

BUSI

NES

SPA

RK P

RECI

NCT

OFF

ICER

EMPL

OYM

ENT

PREC

INCT

CARDINIA CREEK

POUND RD

CHIS

HO

LM

INST

ITU

TE O

F TA

FE

SALV

ATI

ON

ARM

Y CH

URC

H

CASE

Y FI

ELD

S

AM

STEL

GO

LF C

OU

RSE

CRA

NBO

URN

EG

OLF

CO

URS

E

CRA

NBO

URN

ETE

RMIN

AL

STA

TIO

N

RAN

FURL

IEG

OLF

CO

URS

E

THO

MPS

ON

S

RD

BERW

ICK

- CRA

NBO

URN

E R

D

BERWICK - CRANBOURNE RD

CRA

NBOURN

E - FR

ANKSTO

N RD

NARRE WARREN - CRANBOURNE RD

CLYDE - FIVE WAYS RD

SOUTH GIPPSLAND HWY

CAMERON ST

SLA

DEN

ST

EVANS RD

GLA

SSCO

CKS

RD

GLA

SSCO

CKS

RD

WESTERN PORT HWY (FUTURE FREEWAY)

CAM

MS

RD

CEN

TRA

L PA

RKW

AY

ROYA

L BO

TAN

ICG

ARD

ENS

CRA

NBO

URN

E

BOTA

NIC

RID

GE

PREC

INCT

JUN

CTIO

NVI

LLA

GE

CLYD

ETO

WN

SHIP

HU

NT

CLU

BES

TATE

BRIN

DA

LEE

ESTA

TE

CRA

NBO

URN

EN

ORT

H P

RECI

NCT

CL

YDE

NO

RTH

PREC

INCT

CASE

Y CE

NTR

AL

TOW

N C

ENTR

EPR

ECIN

CT

COLL

ISO

NES

TATE

CASC

AD

ESO

N C

LYD

E

CRA

NBO

URN

ETR

AIN

ING

CO

MPL

EX

CRA

NBO

URN

E RA

CECO

URS

E&

REC

REA

TIO

N R

ESER

VE

CRA

NBO

URN

ETO

WN

CEN

TRE

CRA

NBO

URN

ERA

IL S

TATI

ON

FUTU

RECR

AN

BOU

RNE

EAST

RAIL

STA

TIO

N

MER

IND

A P

ARK

RAIL

STA

TIO

N

CRA

NBO

URN

EW

EST

PREC

INCT

SETT

LERS

RU

NG

OLF

CO

URS

E

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

ii CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 31.1 How to read this document 31.2 Land to which this PSP applies 51.3 Development Contributions Plan 51.4 Background information 5

2.0 OUTCOMES 72.1 Vision 72.2 Objectives 72.3 Summary Land Budget 9

3.0 IMPLEMENTATION 113.1 Image, character, and housing 11

3.1.1 Image & character 113.1.2 Housing 11

3.2 Town centres 133.2.1 Town centres 133.2.2 Local Convenience centre 13

3.3 Open Space & Community Facilities 153.3.1 Open Space 153.3.2 Community Facilities 17

3.4 Biodiversity, Threatened Species & Bushfire Management 193.4.1 Biodiversity & Threatened Species 193.4.2 Bushfire Management 19

3.5 Transport & Movement 233.5.1 Public Transport 233.5.2 Walking & Cycling 233.5.3 Road Network 27

3.6 Integrated Water Management & Utilities 313.6.1 Integrated Water Management 313.6.2 Utilities 33

3.7 Infrastructure Delivery & Staging 343.7.1 Precinct Infrastructure Plan 343.7.2 Development Services Strategy 343.7.3 Development Staging 353.7.4 Subdivision Works by Developers 35

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

iiiCASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

Reference to the Metropolitan Planning Authority (MPA) in this document is a reference to the Growth Areas Authority (GAA).

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

iv CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

4.0 APPENDICES 394.1 Precinct Infrastructure Plan 394.2 Property Specific Land Budget 414.3 Town Centre Design Principles 434.4 Street Cross Sections 464.5 Service Placement Guidelines 614.6 Open Space Category Guide 62

PLANS Plan 1 Local context 2Plan 2 Precinct area 6Plan 3 Future urban structure 8Plan 4 Land use budget 10Plan 5 Image, character & housing 14Plan 6 Open space and natural systems 18Plan 7 Native vegetation 20Plan 8 Road network 24Plan 9 Public transport & walking trails 28

TABLES Table 1 Summary Land Use Budget 9Table 2 Lot Size and Indicative Housing Type 14Table 3 Town Centre Hierarchy – Casey Fields South/Clyde Area 15Table 4 Anticipated Employment Creationin precinct 15Table 5 Open Space Delivery Guide 17Table 6 Retarding Basins 35

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

1CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

plan 1_precinct featurescasey �elds south precinct structure plan

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140212

precinct area

residential area

existing roads

existing urban

future urban

contours (0.5m)

ridge line

high point

low point

broiler farm recommended separation distance 288m

registered aboriginal cultural heritage place

existing vegetation / scattered trees

direction of slope

existing dams

AHD 29

AHD 14.5

45

44

45

454646

45

45

4546

46

47

47

45

44

45

45

44

44

4342

42

41

43

43

44

41

4041

40

40

41

4242

41

43

42

41403938

373635

3837

39

38

37

39

49

48

47

46

45

44

43

42

41

40

39

4241

43

44

41 4039

38

3737

37

3637

3738

39

39

4041

42

43

44

4344

45

46

47

48

AHD 41.5

AHD 36.5

AHD 36.5

AHD 47.5

AHD 49

AHD 48

AHD 44

AHD 46.6

AHD 44.5

AHD 41.5

AHD 40

broiler farm

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROAD

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

2 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

1.0 INTRODUCTIONThe Casey Fields South Residential Precinct Structure Plan (the PSP) has been prepared by the Metropolitan Planning Authority (MPA) with the assistance of the Casey City Council, Government agencies, service authorities and major stakeholders.

The PSP is a long-term plan for urban development. It describes how the land is expected to be developed, and how and where services are planned to support development.

The PSP:

• Sets out plans to guide the delivery of quality urban environments in accordance with the Victorian Government guidelines.

• Enables the transition of non-urban land to urban land.

• Sets the vision for how the land should be developed and the outcomes to be achieved.

•Outlines the projects required to ensure that future residents, visitors and workers within the area can be provided with timely access to services and transport necessary to support a quality and affordable lifestyle.

• Sets out objectives, requirements and guidelines for land use, development and subdivision.

• Provides Government agencies, the Council, developers, investors and local communities with certainty about future development.

•Addresses the requirements of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 in accordance with the endorsed program and the relevant action approval for Melbourne’s growth corridors under Part 10 of that Act.

The PSP is informed by:

• The State Planning Policy Framework set out in the Casey Planning Scheme; and

• The Growth Corridor Plans: Managing Melbourne’s Growth (Growth Areas Authority, June 2012); and

• The Local Planning Policy Framework of the Casey Planning Scheme; and

• The Biodiversity Conservation Strategy and Sub Regional Species Strategies for Melbourne’s Growth Areas (Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2013); and

• The Precinct Structure Planning Guidelines (GAA, 2009); and

• Background studies undertaken in the preparation of the PSP.

The following planning documents have been developed in parallel with the PSP to inform and direct the future planning and development of the Precinct:

• The Clyde Development Contributions Plan (DCP) requires development proponents to make a contribution toward infrastructure required to support the development of the Precinct.

• The Casey Fields South Residential Background Report (Background Report).

1.1 How to read this documentThis Precinct Structure Plan (PSP) guides land use and development where a planning permit is required under the Urban Growth Zone (Clause 37.07 of the Casey Planning Scheme), or any other provision of the planning scheme that references this structure plan.

A planning application and a planning permit must implement the outcomes of the PSP.

Each element of the PSP contains requirements, guidelines and conditions as relevant.

Requirements must be adhered to in developing the land. Where they are not demonstrated in a permit application, requirements will usually be included as a condition on a planning permit whether or not they take the same wording as in this structure plan. A requirement may reference a plan, table or figure in the structure plan.

Guidelines express how discretion will be exercised by the responsible authority in certain matters that require a planning permit. If the responsible authority is satisfied that an application for an alternative to a guideline implements the outcomes the responsible authority may consider the alternative. A guideline may include or reference a plan, table or figure in the PSP.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

This page has been left intentionally blank

0 300m20010050

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

4 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

Conditions must be included in a planning permit.

Meeting these requirements, guidelines and conditions will implement the outcomes of the PSP.

Development must also comply with other Acts and approvals where relevant e.g. the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 in the case of biodiversity or the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in the case of cultural heritage, amongst others.

Not every aspect of the land’s use, development or subdivision is addressed in this structure plan. A responsible authority may manage development and issue permits as relevant under its general discretion.

1.2 Land to which this PSP appliesThe CaseyFieldsSouthResidentialPSP 1057.1 adjoins PSP 1054 to the west, and comprises that part of Precinct 1057 north of Ballarto Road. It occupies an area of approximately 110 ha in the City of Casey. The precinct extends from Clyde-Five Ways Road in the east to Casey Fields Boulevard in the west; and north from Ballarto Road to the southern boundary of Casey Fields Sportsgrounds in the north. PSP 57.1 has a Net Developable Area (NDA) of approximately 91 hectares.

Plan 1 identifies the key features of the land contained within the precinct boundaries.

1.3 Development Contributions PlanDevelopment proponents within the Casey Fields South Residential Precincts will be bound by the Clyde Development Contributions Plan (the DCP). The DCP sets out requirements for infrastructure funding across this and two other precincts.

The DCP is a separate document incorporated in the Casey Planning Scheme.

1.4 Background InformationDetailed background information on the precincts is available including their local and metropolitan context, history, biodiversity, landform and topography, open space and community facilities. This information is summarized in the Casey Fields South PSP 1057.1 Background Report and has informed the preparation of the PSP.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

5CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

precinct boundary

residential

convenience centre

proposed regional Casey Fields development

local passive open space (encumbered)

drainage open space (encumbered)

broiler farm recommended separation distance 288m

primary arterial road (6 lanes)

secondary arterial road (4 lanes)

connector road

access level 1

access level 2 - Casey Fields interface

access level 2 - green link

future urban

existing urban

rail line

plan 2_future urban structurecasey �elds south precinct structure plan

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227

broiler farm

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROAD

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

6 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

2.0 OUTCOMES

2.1 VisionCaseyFieldsSouthResidentialPrecinct occupies an area of approximately 110 ha in the City of Casey. The precinct extends from Clyde-Five Ways Road in the east to Casey Fields Boulevard in the west; and to the southern boundary of Casey Fields Sportsgrounds in the north.

The Casey Fields South PSP is predominantly residential, with a local convenience centre planned for Ballarto Road, and will ultimately support a residential community of approximately 1460 dwellings and a population of around 4,100 people.

The precinct will provide an urbanised link between existing development to the west of Casey Fields Boulevard, and proposed new residential areas to the east of Clyde-Five Ways Road.

Casey Fields South PSP will be a community well connected to regional playing fields, building units close proximity to the existing Clyde Township and the Ballarto Road major town centre, and the potential future Clyde Railway Station. The topography of the PSP area provides for attractive views and vistas.

2.2 ObjectivesThe following objectives describe the desired outcomes of the precinct’s development, and guide the implementation of the vision.

IMAGE.CHARACTER,HERITAGEANDHOUSING

O1 Achieve a diversity of streetscape and open space outcomes to enhance local character and amenity, establishing a landscape of connecting canopies along streets, parks and waterways.

O2 Deliver a minimum of 1460 new homes (16 dwellings net developable hectare overall precinct average).

O3 Identify areas of European and Aboriginal Cultural Heritage elements within the precinct.

O4 Ensure medium and high density development is prioritised in locations proximate to high amenity and/or high activity areas.

O5 Promote housing choice through the delivery of a range of lot sizes capable of accommodating a variety of dwelling types.

TOWNCENTRES&EMPLOYMENT

O6 Encourage the provision of local convenience retail without compromising the functions and roles of nearby town centres.

OPENSPACE&COMMUNITYFACILITIES

O7 Deliver an integrated and linked network of local passive parks, active recreation reserves, and community infrastructure that meets the needs and aspirations of the new community.

BIODIVERSITY,THREATENEDSPECIES&BUSHFIREMANAGEMENT

O8 Plan for the long-term conservation and enhancement of areas of biodiversity.

O9 Ensure that bushfire protection measures are considered in the layout and design of development and the local street network.

TRANSPORT&MOVEMENT

O10 Provide strong external connections to the surrounding road network to foster accessibility of the precinct.

O11 Develop a slow-speed and permeable connector road network.

INTEGRATEDWATERMANAGEMENT&UTILITIES

O12 Deliver an integrated water management system that reduces reliance on reticulated potable water, increases the re-use of alternative water, minimises flood risk, ensures waterway health, and contributes towards a sustainable and green urban environment.

PRECINCTINFRASTRUCTUREPLAN&STAGING

O13 Ensure pre-development property structure does not impede the realisation of cohesive and integrated neighbourhoods.

O14 Ensure that development staging is co-ordinated with the delivery of key local and state infrastructure.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

7CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

plan 3_land budgetcasey �elds south precinct structure plan

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227

1

precinct boundary

residential

convenience centre

proposed regional Casey Fields development

local passive open space (encumbered)

drainage open space (encumbered)

broiler farm recommended separation distance 288m

primary arterial road (6 lanes)

secondary arterial road (4 lanes)

connector road

access level 1

access level 2 - Casey Fields interface

access level 2 - green link

future urban

existing urban

rail line

property boundary & number

1 2

3 4

65

7

broiler farm

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROAD

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

8 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

2.3 Summary land budgetThe Net Developable Area (NDA) is calculated by deducting the land requirements for major roads, servicing, community facilities and open space from the overall Precinct area. The estimated NDA for the precinct is 91 hectares representing approximately 82% of the PSP area.

State Planning Policy currently aims to achieve a minimum of 15 dwellings per hectare of NDA. This PSP is expected to exceed the minimum dwelling density and yield delivering approximately 1,460 dwellings with an average density of 16 dwellings per hectare of NDA.

An average household size of 2.8 persons for conventional density housing (based on Victoria in Future 2012) is used to estimate the future population of the PSP area. On this basis the future population of the PSP is estimated to be approximately 4,100 residents.

The table below sets out the land area and summary lot yield for various uses in the future urban structure.

Table 1 Summary land use budget

HECTARES % OF TOTAL % OF NDA

TOTAL PRECINCT AREA (ha) 110.17 100.0%

TransportRail Corridors / Easements 5.66 0.49% 6.39%

Sub‐total Transport 5.66 5.1% 6.39%

Open Space

Encumbered Open Space Available for Recreation

Waterway Corridor/Wetland / Retarding 4.60 4.17% 5.19%

Sub‐total Encumbered Open Space Available for Recreation 4.60 4.17% 5.19%

Unencumbered Local Open Space

Local Sportsfields (active open space) 0.00 0.0% 0.00%

Local Parks (passive open space) 3.54 0.3% 4.00%

Sub‐total Unencumbered Local Open Space 3.54 3.2% 4.00%

Other Unencumbered Open Space

Existing local Parks (passive open space) 0.00 0.0% 0.00%

Regional Sportsfields (active open space) 7.76 7.0% 8.76%

Sub‐total 7.76 7.05% 8.76%

Sub‐total other Unencumbered Open Space 11.31 10.3% 12.76%

Subtotal Open Space Available for Recreation 15.90 14.4% 17.95%

Other

Existing Clyde Township RZ1 Area 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Sub Station 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Sub‐total 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

TOTAL NET DEVELOPABLE AREA ‐  (NDA) Ha 88.61 80.43%

NET DEVELOPABLE AREA ‐ RESIDENTIAL (NDAR) Ha 88.61 80.43%

DescriptionPSP 1057.1 Casey Fields South ‐ Residential

NET DEVELOPABLE AREA ‐ RESIDENTIAL (NDAR) Ha 88.61 80.43%

Description

Residential Local Open Space (expressed as % of NDAR) Hectares

Local Sportsfields (active open space) 0.00

Local Parks (passive open space) 3.54

Regional Sportsfields (active open space) area not provided through clause 52.01 Open Space Delivery

7.76

Sub‐total 11.31

Employment Local Open Space (expressed as % of NDAE) Hectares

Total Open Space 11.31

Description

Residential  NDA (Ha) Dwell / NDHa Dwellings

Standard Density 88.61 16 1,418

Convenience Town Centre 2 0 0

Totals Residential Yield Against NDA 88.61 16.00 1,418

Anticipated population @  2.8 persons per dwelling 3,970

PSP 1057.1 Casey Fields South ‐ Residential

% of NDAR

0.00%

12.76%

% of NDAE

4.00%

8.76%

PSP 1057.1 Casey Fields South ‐ Residential

12.76%

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

9CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

This page has been left intentionally blank

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

10 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

HECTARES % OF TOTAL % OF NDA

TOTAL PRECINCT AREA (ha) 110.17 100.0%

TransportRail Corridors / Easements 5.66 0.49% 6.39%

Sub‐total Transport 5.66 5.1% 6.39%

Open Space

Encumbered Open Space Available for Recreation

Waterway Corridor/Wetland / Retarding 4.60 4.17% 5.19%

Sub‐total Encumbered Open Space Available for Recreation 4.60 4.17% 5.19%

Unencumbered Local Open Space

Local Sportsfields (active open space) 0.00 0.0% 0.00%

Local Parks (passive open space) 3.54 0.3% 4.00%

Sub‐total Unencumbered Local Open Space 3.54 3.2% 4.00%

Other Unencumbered Open Space

Existing local Parks (passive open space) 0.00 0.0% 0.00%

Regional Sportsfields (active open space) 7.76 7.0% 8.76%

Sub‐total 7.76 7.05% 8.76%

Sub‐total other Unencumbered Open Space 11.31 10.3% 12.76%

Subtotal Open Space Available for Recreation 15.90 14.4% 17.95%

Other

Existing Clyde Township RZ1 Area 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Sub Station 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Sub‐total 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

TOTAL NET DEVELOPABLE AREA ‐  (NDA) Ha 88.61 80.43%

NET DEVELOPABLE AREA ‐ RESIDENTIAL (NDAR) Ha 88.61 80.43%

DescriptionPSP 1057.1 Casey Fields South ‐ Residential

NET DEVELOPABLE AREA ‐ RESIDENTIAL (NDAR) Ha 88.61 80.43%

Description

Residential Local Open Space (expressed as % of NDAR) Hectares

Local Sportsfields (active open space) 0.00

Local Parks (passive open space) 3.54

Regional Sportsfields (active open space) area not provided through clause 52.01 Open Space Delivery

7.76

Sub‐total 11.31

Employment Local Open Space (expressed as % of NDAE) Hectares

Total Open Space 11.31

Description

Residential  NDA (Ha) Dwell / NDHa Dwellings

Standard Density 88.61 16 1,418

Convenience Town Centre 2 0 0

Totals Residential Yield Against NDA 88.61 16.00 1,418

Anticipated population @  2.8 persons per dwelling 3,970

PSP 1057.1 Casey Fields South ‐ Residential

% of NDAR

0.00%

12.76%

% of NDAE

4.00%

8.76%

PSP 1057.1 Casey Fields South ‐ Residential

12.76%

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

11CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

plan 4_image, character, heritage & housingcasey �elds south precinct structure plan

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227

primary arterial road

secondary arterial road

connector road

access level 1

access level 2 - Casey Fields interface

precinct boundary

residential

convenience centre

proposed regional Casey Fields development

local passive open space (encumbered)

drainage open space (encumbered)

broiler farm recommended separation distance 288m

key high points

view lines

access level 2 - green link

future urban

existing urban

rail line

core walking catchment (400m)

local convenience centre

broiler farm

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROAD

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

12 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.0 IMPLEMENTATION

3.1 Image, character, heritage and housing

3.1.1 Image, character and heritage

IMAGE AND CHARACTER

REQUIREMENTS

R1

Street trees must be provided on both sides of all roads and streets (excluding laneways) at regular intervals appropriate to tree size at maturity and not exceeding the guidance below unless otherwise agreed by the responsible authority:

AVERAGEINTERVAL TREESIZE8 – 10 metres Small trees (less than 10 metre canopy)10 – 12 metres Medium trees (10 – 15 metre canopy)12 – 15 metres Large trees (Canopy larger than 15 metres)

R2 Trees in parks and streets must be:• Suitable for local conditions; and• Planted in modified and improved soil as required to support tree longevity.

R3 Street tree planting must use locally appropriate species and be consistent with any guidance provided on the relevant cross section within this Precinct Structure Plan unless otherwise approved by the responsible authority.

R4 Key Green streets must be provided generally where shown on Plans 2, 4 and 8.

GUIDELINES

G1 Street networks within subdivisions should be designed to maximise the number of connections and direct views to waterways, open space, and town centres.

G2 Significant elements of the landscape and built form should be used as focal points for view lines along streets. Elements may include items such as public buildings and landmarks.

G3 Retained windrows and significant trees should be located within the public domain, including parks and road reserves, unless otherwise approved by the responsible authority.

G4 Street trees should be used consistently across neighbourhoods to reinforce movement hierarchy and local character.

G5 A consistent suite of lighting and furniture should be used across neighbourhoods, appropriate to the type and role of street or public space, unless otherwise approved by the responsible authority.

G6 Trees in streets and parks should be larger species wherever space allows (to facilitate continuous canopy cover).

3.1.2 Housing

HOUSINGREQUIREMENTS

R5 Residential subdivisions must deliver a broad range of lot sizes capable of accommodating a variety of housing types.

R6 Development must appropriately respond to the potential future Clyde railway station site (located in the adjoining PSP area) and the future Principal Public Transport Network through the creation of opportunities for high-density residential development.

R7

Lots must front or side:• Waterways and public open space.• Local access streets.• Connector roads.• Arterial roads.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

13CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

R8

Subdivision applications must include indicative concept layouts for any lots identified for the future development of medium density, high density , or integrated housing that suitably demonstrate:Active interfaces with adjacent streets, open spaces and waterways.

• Active interfaces with adjacent streets, open spaces and waterways.

• Safe and effective vehicle and pedestrian access and internal circulation, as appropriate.

GUIDELINES

G7 Development should demonstrate how the proposed subdivision will deliver a variety of housing types and lot sizes.

G8 Residential subdivision stages should provide across neighbourhoods a broad range of lot sizes capable of accommodating a variety of housing types as described in Table 2.

G9 Subdivision of land within a walkable distance of town centres (including the Clyde Major Town Centre and the potential future Clyde rail station in the adjoining Clyde Creek PSP), and designated public transport routes, should create a range of lot sizes suitable for the delivery of medium and higher density housing types listed in Table 2.

G10

Specialised housing forms such as retirement living or aged care should be:

• Integrated into the wider urban structure.

• Located in close proximity to town centres and community hubs.

• Accessible by public transport.

CONDITIONS

C1

EnsuringtheSmallLotHousingCodeisanapprovedbuildingenvelopeunderPart4oftheBuilding Regulations 2006The Small Lot Housing Code incorporated into the Casey Planning Scheme is endorsed under this planning permit.

The Small Lot Housing Code must be shown as a restriction (on a plan of subdivision certified under the Subdivision Act 1988) that is recorded on the register under the Transfer of Land Act 1958 in relation to an allotment that is less than 300 square metres in area.

Table 2 Lot size and housing type guide

The following table provides an indication of the typical range of lot sizes that support the delivery of a broad range of housing types.

HOUSING TYPES THAT MAY BE SUPPORTEDLOT SIZE CATEGORY (m2)

LESS THAN 300m2 301-600m2 MORE THAN

600m2

Small Lot Housing including townhouses and attached, semi-detached and detached houses

Dual occupancies, duplexes

Detached houses

Multi-unit housing sites including terraces, row houses and villas

Stacked housing including apartments, shop top living and walk up flats

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

14 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.2 Town centres and employment

3.2.1 Town Centres

Table 3 Town centre hierarchy - Casey Fields/Clyde Creek area

TOWN CENTRE RETAIL FLOOR SPACE

COMMERCIAL FLOOR SPACE

LOCATION AND USES

Clyde Road Major Town Centre (in PSP 1054)

40-50,000 m2 40-50,000 m2 Located to service both PSP 1054 and the Casey Fields South Residential PSP population. Should include a full range of community uses, business, and residential.

Tuckers Road Local Town Centre (in PSP 1054)

5,000 m2 1,000 m2 Centrally located to service residents in PSP 1054, as well as residents of Casey Fields South Residential PSP.

Ballarto Road Local convenience centre (in PSP 1057.1)

1,500 m2 - Meets the local needs of residents of Casey Fields South Residential PSP.

Table 4 Anticipated employment creation

LAND USE MEASURE JOBS QTY IN PSP EST JOBS

Local convenience centre 1 job/30 m2 50 1 50

Home based business Jobs/dwelling 0.05 1,460 70

Community Centre Jobs/centre 10 1 10

TOTALESTIMATED 130

3.2.2 Local Convenience Centres

REQUIREMENTS

R9 A Local Convenience Centre may be developed proximate to the location shown on Plan 2 and must be consistent with the guidance provided in Table 3. Any Local Convenience Centre development must be located on a connector road.

R10 Provision of retail floor space within a local convenience centre must not exceed 1,500m2 (without a planning permit).

R11 Subdivision and development within Local Convenience Centres must have regard to the design principles and performance criteria for Local Convenience Centres outlined in Appendix 4.3, as appropriate.

GUIDELINES

G11 Development of any Local Convenience Centre should be proximate to an open space area or community hub.

G12

The design of any Local Convenience Centre must:

• Provide for a mix of tenancies.

• Incorporate a range of uses including retail, offices and medium and high density housing.

• Locate any servicing infrastructure or car parking to the rear or centre of the allotment in a manner that protects the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood.

G13 Residential densities within the core walkable catchment of the Local Convenience Centre (as shown on Plan 4) should demonstrate that the development responds to the zone objectives of the applied Residential Growth Zone.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

15CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

plan 5_open space & community facilitiescasey �elds south precinct structure plan

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227

POS #

precinct boundary

residential

passive open space catchment 400m

proposed regional Casey Fields development

local passive open space (encumbered)

park ID

primary arterial road (6 lanes)

secondary arterial road (4 lanes)

connector road

access level 1

access level 2 - Casey Fields interface

access level 2 - green link

future urban

existing urban

rail line

broiler farm

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROAD

P OS 1

P OS 2

P OS 3

P OS 4

P OS 5

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

16 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.3 Open Space, Community Facilities and Education

3.3.1 Open Space

Table 5 Open Space Delivery Guide

PARK ID  AREA (HA) TYPE ATTRIBUTES Location RESPONSIBILITYPO1 0.59 Passive Open Space  Neighbourhood As shown on plan 5  CCCPO2 0.06 Civic square Town Square/Urban Park As shown on plan 5  CCCPO3 1.03 Passive Open Space  District As shown on plan 5  CCCPO4 1.26 Passive Open Space  District As shown on plan 5  CCCPO5 0.59 Passive Open Space  District As shown on plan 5  CCC

CC = City of Casey

REQUIREMENTS

R12 All public landscaped areas must be designed and constructed to enable practical maintenance and planted with species suitable to the local climate and soil conditions.

R13

All parks must be located, designed and developed in accordance with the relevant description in Table 5 unless otherwise approved by the responsible authority. The area of the park may vary so long as it remains inside the guidance for the relevant type of park. Where a park is smaller than that outlined in the table, the land must be added to another park or used to create a new park in addition to those outlined on Plan 5. Where a proposed park is larger than outlined in the table it may be accepted so long as it does not result in the removal of another park allocation.

R14 Where a passive open space shown on Plan 5 spans across multiple properties, the first development proponent to lodge a permit application must prepare an indicative concept master plan for the entire park unless otherwise agreed by the responsible authority.

R15 Design and layout of waterway corridors and any other encumbered open space must maximise the potential for integration of recreation uses where this does not conflict with the primary function of the land.

R16 Parks and squares within town centres must be delivered via the Clause 52.01 passive open space contributions, as appropriate.

R17 Any fencing of open space, whether encumbered or unencumbered, must be low scale and visually permeable to facilitate public safety and surveillance.

GUIDELINES

G14 Lots directly fronting open space must provide for a primary point of access from a footpath or shared path proximate to the lot boundary.

G15 Subject to being compatible with Table 5 and Appendix 4.6 parks and open space should contain extensive tree planting.

G16 A proponent delivering a master plan for a local passive park that traverses multiple property ownerships should consult with the landowners of parcels covered by the park to ensure an integrated design.

CONDITIONS

C2

ConditionsforsubdivisionorbuildingandworkspermitswherelandisrequiredforpublicopenspaceLand required for public open space as a local or district park, as set out in the Casey Fields South Residential Precinct Structure Plan or the Clyde Development Contributions Plan, must be transferred to or vested in Council at no cost to Council unless the land is funded by the Clyde Development Contributions Plan or contributes to satisfaction of required provision under Clause 52.01.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

17CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

This page has been left intentionally blank

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

18 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

Passive Open Space Contributions – Residential

REQUIREMENTS

R18

Further to the public open space contribution required by Clause 52.01 of the Casey Planning Scheme, this provision sets out the amount of land to be contributed by each property in the precinct and consequently where a cash contribution is required in lieu of land.

All land owners must provide a public open space contribution equal to 4% of the Net Developable Area (NDA) upon subdivision of land in accordance with the following:

• Where land is required for unencumbered open space purposes as shown on Plan 3 and specified in Table 1 and is equal to 4% of NDA that land is to be transferred to Council at no cost.

• Where no land or less than 4% of NDA is shown Plan 3 and specified in Table 1, as required for unencumbered open space purposes a cash contribution is to be made to Council to bring the total open space contribution to a value equal to 4% of NDA of that site.

• Where land required for unencumbered open space purpose as shown on Plan 3 and specified in Table 1 is more than 4% of NDA, Council will pay an amount equivalent to the value of the additional land being provided by that proposed development.

3.3.2 Community Facilities and Education

REQUIREMENTS

R19 Schools and community centres must be designed to front, and be directly accessed from, a public street with car parks located away from the main entry.

GUIDELINES

G17 Any educational or community use not shown on Plan 2 should be located within or proximate to a major town centre, local town centre or an existing community hub, as appropriate.

G18 Community centres which are located in a town centre should be designed to maximise efficiency of land use through the sharing and overall reduction of car parking.

G19

Community facilities, schools, and active recreation reserves which are co located should be designed to:

• maximise efficiencies through the sharing of car parking and other complementary infrastructure.

• maximise direct access and permeability for pedestrians and cyclists through and between facilities.

G20 The indicative layout of community facilities, schools, and open space as illustrated in Plan 5 may be altered where approved by the responsible authority.

G21 Any private childcare, medical, or similar facility, educational, community or civic infrastructure not shown on Plan 2 should be located proximate to the Major Town Centre, any Local Town Centre, Local Convenience Centres, or nominated community hub, as appropriate.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

19CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

plan 6_native vegetation plancasey �elds south precinct structure plan

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140304

precinct boundary

growling grass frog cat 2 habitatto be removed

remnant patches to be removed

scattered trees to be removed

existing urban

future urban

broiler farm

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROAD

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

20 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.4 Biodiversity, Threatened Species and Bushfire Management

3.4.1 Biodiversity and Threatened Species

GUIDELINES

G22 Where located adjacent or nearby each other, maximise the integration of linear and conservation open space with parks.

G23 The layout and design of the waterways, wetlands and retarding basins (including the design of paths, bridges and boardwalks and the stormwater drainage system) should integrate with biodiversity and natural systems to the satisfaction of responsible authorities.

G24 Landscaping adjacent to retained indigenous vegetation and waterways should be complementary to conservation objectives and should use indigenous planting where appropriate.

G25 Street trees and public open space landscaping should contribute to habitat for indigenous fauna species, in particular arboreal animals and birds, where practical.

CONDITIONS

C3

KangarooManagementPlanPrior to the commencement of any works in a stage of subdivision a Kangaroo Management Plan must be submitted for approval to the Department of Environment & Primary Industries. The plan must include:a. Strategies (e.g. staging) to avoid land locking Kangaroos; andb. Management solutions and action to respond to their containment in an area with no

reasonable likelihood of their continued safe existence.

C4

Habitatcompensation

• Before subdivision, the construction of a building or the construction or carrying out of works on land starts, offsets for the loss or deemed loss of native vegetation and threatened species habitat must be secured in accordance with the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Melbourne’s Growth Corridors (Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 2013) and Habitat compensation under the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy (Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 2013), to the satisfaction of the Secretary to the Department of Environment and Primary Industries.

C5

SalvageandtranslocationThe Salvage and Translocation Protocol for Melbourne’s Growth Corridors (Melbourne Strategic Assessment) (Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 2013) must be implemented in the carrying out of development to the satisfaction of the Secretary to the Department of Environment and Primary Industries.

3.4.2 Bushfire Management

REQUIREMENTS

R20

For the purpose of Clause 56.06-7, the requirements of the relevant fire authority are, unless otherwise approved by the CFA:

• Constructed roads must be a minimum of 7.3m trafficable width where cars park on both sides, or: » A minimum of 5.4m in trafficable width where cars may park on one side only. » A minimum of 3.5m width no parking and 0.5m clearance to structures on either side, and

if this width applies, there must be passing bays of at least 20m long, 6m wide and located not more than 200m apart.

• Roads must be constructed so that they are capable of accommodating a vehicle of 15 tonnes for the trafficable road width.

• The average grade of a road must be no more than 1 in 7 (14.4% or 8.1º).

• The steepest grade on a road must be no more than 1 in 5 (20% or 11.3º) with this grade continuing for no more than 50 metres at any one point.

• Dips on the road must have no more than 1 in 8 grade (12.5% or 7.1º) entry and exit angle.

• Constructed dead end roads more than 60 metres in length from the nearest intersection must have a turning circle with a minimum radius of 8m (including roll over curbs if they are provided).

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

21CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

This page has been left intentionally blank

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

22 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

R21

Before the commencement of works for a stage of subdivision, a Construction Management Plan that addresses Bushfire Risk Management must be submitted to and approved by the responsible authority and the CFA. The Construction Management Plan must specify, amongst other things:

• Measures to reduce the risk from fire within the surrounding rural landscape and protect residents from the threat of fire.

• A separation buffer, consistent with the separation distances specified in AS3959-2009, between the edge of the development and non-urban areas.

• How adequate opportunities for access and egress will be provided for early residents, construction workers and emergency vehicles.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

23CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227plan 7 _street networkcasey �elds south precinct structure plan

access level 2

access level 2 - casey �elds interface

connector street

access level 2 - green link

access level 1

future urban

existing urban

signalised intersection

pedestrian signals

left in / left out intersection

service street

precinct boundary

roundabout

two way intersection

broiler farm recommendedseparation distance 288m

primary arterial road (6 lanes)

secondary arterial road (4 lanes)

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROADbroiler farm

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

24 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.5 Transport and Movement

3.5.1 Public Transport

REQUIREMENTS

R22 A road nominated on Plan 8 as a potential bus route is to be constructed (including partial construction where relevant) in accordance with the corresponding cross section in the PSP and in accordance with the Public Transport Guidelines for Land Use and Development.

R23 Any roundabouts on roads shown as ‘bus capable’ on Plan 8 must be constructed to accommodate ultra-low-floor buses in accordance with the Public Transport Guidelines for Land Use and Development.

R24 Bus stop facilities must be designed as an integral part of town centres and activity generating land uses such as schools, sports fields and employment areas.

CONDITIONS

C6

Unless otherwise agreed by Public Transport Victoria, prior to the issue of a Statement of Compliance for any subdivision stage, bus stops must be constructed, at full cost to the permit holder, as follows:

• Generally in the location identified by Public Transport Victoria;

• In accordance with the Public Transport Guidelines for Land Use and Development with a concrete hard stand area, and in activity centres a shelter must also be constructed;

• Be compliant with the Disability Discrimination Act – Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport 2002; and

• Be provided with direct and safe pedestrian access to a pedestrian path.

All to the satisfaction of Public Transport Victoria and the responsible authority.

3.5.2 Walking and Cycling

REQUIREMENTS

R25

Design of all streets and arterial roads must give priority to the requirements of pedestrians and cyclists by providing:

• Footpaths of at least 1.5 metres on both sides of all streets and roads unless otherwise specified by the PSP.

• Shared paths or bicycle paths where shown on Plan 8 or as shown on the relevant cross-sections in Appendix 4.4 or as specified by another requirement in the PSP.

• Safe, accessible and convenient crossing points of connector roads and local streets at all intersections, key desire lines and locations of high amenity (e.g. town centre and open space).

• Safe pedestrian crossings of arterial roads at all intersections, at key desire lines, and on regular intervals appropriate to the function of the road and public transport provision.

• Pedestrian priority crossings on all slip lanes.

• Safe and convenient transition between on and off-road bicycle networks.

All to the satisfaction of the coordinating roads authority and the responsible authority.

R26 On a construction or engineering plan approved under a subdivision permit, specification of any bicycle path on a connector road must also be to the satisfaction of Public Transport Victoria.

R27

Shared and pedestrian paths along waterways must:

• Be delivered by development proponents consistent with the network shown on Plan 8

• Be above 1:10 year flood level with any crossing of the waterway designed to be above the 1:100 flood level to maintain hydraulic function of the waterway.

• Be constructed to a standard that satisfies the requirements of Melbourne Water. Where a shared path is to be delivered on one side of a waterway as outlined in Plan 8, a path is also to be delivered on the other side of the waterway but may be constructed to a lesser standard such as granitic gravel or similar granular material.

All to the satisfaction of the Melbourne Water and the responsible authority.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

25CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

This page has been left intentionally blank

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

26 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

R28 Shared and pedestrian paths as shown on Plan 8 must be delivered by development proponents.

R29 Bicycle parking facilities are to be provided by development proponents in convenient locations at key destinations such as parks and activity centres.

R30 The alignment of the off-road bicycle path must be designed for cyclists travelling up to 30 km/hr.

R31 Bicycle priority at intersections of minor streets and connector roads with dedicated off-road bicycle paths must be achieved through strong and consistent visual and physical cues and supportive directional and associated road signs.

GUIDELINES

G26 Lighting should be installed along shared, pedestrian, and cycle paths linking key destinations, unless otherwise approved by the responsible authority.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

27CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227plan 8_public transport & path networkcasey �elds south precinct structure plan

precinct boundary

railway line

arterial road (bus capable)

other road (bus capable)

2 way o�-raod bike lane & pedestrian path

principal bike network (o� -road)

signalised intersection

left in / left out intersection

future urban

existing urban

broiler farm recommended separation distance 288m

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROADbroiler farm

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

28 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.5.3 Road Network

REQUIREMENTS

R32

The connector road network must:

• Provide for slow speed and permeable links.

• Connect across arterial roads and traverses through the core of each square mile.

• Facilitate efficient and direct pedestrian, cyclist, bus and vehicle movement.

• Efficiently link pedestrians and cyclists to jobs and the public transport system.

R33 Subdivision layouts must form a permeable street network that provides convenient access to local open space and allows for the effective integration with neighbouring properties.

R34

Approximately 30% of local streets (including connector streets) within a subdivision must apply an alternative cross section to the ‘standard’ cross section for these streets outlined in Appendix 4.4.

Examples of potential variations are provided in Appendix 4.4, however others are encouraged including but not limited to:

• Varied street tree placement;

• Varied footpath or carriageway placement;

• Introduction of elements to create a boulevard effect;

• Varied carriageway or parking bay pavement; and

• Differing tree outstand treatments.

For the purposes of this requirement, changes to street tree species between or within streets do not constitute a variation.

Alternative cross sections must ensure that:

• Minimum required carriageway dimensions are maintained to ensure safe and efficient operation of emergency vehicles on all streets as well as buses on connector streets.

• The performance characteristics of standard cross sections as they relate to pedestrian and cycle use are maintained.

• Relevant minimum road reserve widths for the type of street (illustrated in Appendix 4.4) are maintained, unless otherwise approved by the responsible authority.

R35

Where a single street spans across multiple properties that street may consist of multiple cross sections so long as a suitable transition has been allowed for between each. Where that street has already been constructed or approved for construction to a property boundary, the onus is on the development connecting into that street to adopt a consistent cross-section until that suitable transition can be made.

R36 Convenient and direct access to the connector road network must be provided through neighbouring properties where a property does not otherwise have access to the connector network or signalised access to the arterial road network, as appropriate.

R37 Vehicle access to lots fronting arterial roads must be provided from a service road, local internal loop road or rear lane only, to the satisfaction of the coordinating road authority.

R38 Configuration of vehicle access to lots from a public street must ensure that there is sufficient separation between crossovers to allow for a minimum of one on-street car park for every two residential lots.

R39 Vehicle access to a lot that is six metres or less in width must be via rear laneway, unless otherwise approved by the responsible authority.

GUIDELINES

G27 Street layouts should provide multiple convenient routes to major destinations such as the potential future Clyde railway station site and Ballarto Road major town centre and the arterial road network.

G28 Street block lengths should not exceed 240 metres to ensure a permeable and low speed environment for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles is achieved.

G29 Culs-de-sac should not detract from convenient pedestrian, cycle and vehicular connections.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

29CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

This page has been left intentionally blank

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

30 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

G30 Slip lanes should be avoided in areas of high pedestrian activity and only be provided at any other intersection between connector roads and arterial roads where they are necessitated by high traffic volumes, to the satisfaction of the coordinating roads authority.

G31

The frequency of vehicular crossovers on widened verges (a verge in excess of six metres) should be minimised through the use of a combination of:

• Rear loaded lots with laneway access.

• Vehicular access from the side of a lot.

• Combined or grouped crossovers.

• Increased lot widths.

CONDITIONS

C7

ConditionsforsubdivisionorbuildingandworkspermitswherelandisrequiredforroadwideningLand required for road widening including right of way flaring for the ultimate design of any

intersection within an existing or proposed local road must be transferred to or vested in Council at no cost to the acquiring agency unless funded by the Clyde Development Contributions Plan.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

31CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227plan 9_integrated water managementcasey �elds south precinct structure plan

precinct boundary

local passive open space (unencumbered )

drainage open space (encumbered )

access level 2 - green link

future urban

existing urban

Stormwater quality treatment of retardation assets shown on the plan are subject to con�rmation through preparation of MWC Development Service Schemes and through detailed design, to the satisfaction of Melbourne Water.

broiler farm recommended separation distance 288m

retarding basin located on muddy gates lane and manks road - not to scale.

North RB area Whilst all due skill and attention has been used Melbourne Water Corporatshall not be liable in anyway for loss of any kind including damages, costsinterest, loss of profits or special loss or damage, arising from any errorinaccuracy, incompleteness or other defect in this information. By receivand accepting this information the recipient acknowledges that MelbournWater Corporation makes no representations as to the accuracy or comof this information and ought carry out its own investigation if appropriate.

Borehole

Natural waterway

Water supply main

Sewer main

• Drain alignment

Drainage and waterways boundary

Storage reservoir

MWC owned land

1

2

3

6

7

4

8

3

1.5

3.54.5

6.5

7.5

8.5

11.5

0.5

2.5

3.5

6.5

7.5

8.5

8.5CL

YDE

FIVE

WA

YS R

D.

BALLARTO ROADbroiler farm

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

32 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.6 Integrated Water Management & Utilities

3.6.1 Integrated Water Management

REQUIREMENTS

R40 Consistent with Clause 56.01-2 and Clause 56.07 of the Casey Planning Scheme, VPP Practice Note 39, and any requirements or guidelines in this PSP, a subdivision of 60 or more lots must include an Integrated Water Management Plan.

R41 Development must meet or exceed best practice stormwater quality treatment standards prior to discharge to receiving waterways and as outlined on Plan 9, unless otherwise approved by Melbourne Water and the responsible authority.

R42 Final design and boundary of constructed waterways, waterway corridors, retarding basins, stormwater quality treatment infrastructure, and associated paths, boardwalks, bridges, and planting, must be to the satisfaction of Melbourne Water and the responsible authority.

R43

Development staging must provide for the delivery of ultimate waterway and drainage infrastructure, including stormwater quality treatment. Where this is not possible, development proposals must demonstrate how any interim solution adequately manages and treats stormwater generated from the development and how this will enable delivery of an ultimate drainage solution, all to the satisfaction of Melbourne Water and the responsible authority.

R44 Stormwater conveyance and treatment must be designed in accordance with the relevant Development Services Scheme to the satisfaction of Melbourne Water.

GUIDELINES

G32 The design and layout of roads, road reserves, and public open space should optimise water use efficiency and long-term viability of vegetation and public uses through the use of Water Sensitive Urban Design initiatives.

G33 Where practical, development should include integrated water management initiatives to diversify water supply, reduce reliance on potable water and increase the utilisation of storm and waste water contributing to a sustainable and green urban environment.

G34 Development should have regard to relevant policies and strategies being implemented by the responsible authority, Melbourne Water and South East Water, including any approved Integrated Water Management Plan.

G35 Where practical, integrated water management systems should be designed to:

• Maximise habitat values for local flora and fauna species.

• Enable future harvesting and/or treatment and re-use of stormwater, including those options or opportunities outlined in Plan 9.

G36

Where practical, and where primary waterway, conservation or recreation functions are not adversely affected, land required for integrated water management initiatives (such as stormwater harvesting, aquifer storage and recharge, sewer mining) should be incorporated within the precinct open space system as depicted on Plan 5, subject to the approval of the responsible authority.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

33CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

1:10,000 @ A4

8006004002000 1,000

V140227plan 10_utilitiescasey �elds south precinct structure plan

NOTES:

• The alignment and size of utilities shown on this plan are indicative and subject to confirmation by the relevant service authority

precinct area

proposed sewer

proposed sewer alignment pumping station (indicative location)

broiler farm recommended separation distance 288m

CLYD

E FI

VE W

AYS

RD

.

BALLARTO ROADbroiler farm

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

34 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.6.2 Utilities

REQUIREMENTS

R45 Trunk services are to be placed along the general alignments shown on Plan 10, subject to any refinements as advised by the relevant service authorities.

R46

Before development commences on a property, functional layout plans are to be submitted of the road network showing the location of all:

• Underground services

• Driveways/crossovers

• Street lights

• Street trees

A typical cross section of each street is also to be submitted showing above and below ground placement of services, street lights and trees.

The plans and cross sections must demonstrate how services, driveways and street lights will be placed so as to achieve the road reserve width (consistent with the road cross sections outlined in this PSP) and accommodate the minimum level of street tree planting (as outlined in this PSP). If required, the plan and cross sections will nominate which services will be placed under footpaths or road pavement. The plans and cross sections are to be approved by the responsible authority and all relevant service authorities before development commences.

R47 Delivery of underground services must be coordinated, located, and bundled (utilising common trenching) to facilitate the planting of trees and other vegetation within road verges.

R48 All existing above ground electricity cables of less than 66kv voltage must be placed underground as part of the upgrade of existing roads.

R49 All new electricity supply infrastructure (excluding substations and cables of a voltage of 66kv or greater) must be provided underground.

R50 Where existing above ground electricity cables of 66kv voltage are retained along road ways, underground conduits are to be provided as part of the upgrade of these roads to allow for future undergrounding of the electricity supply.

R51

Above ground utilities must be identified at the subdivision design stage to ensure effective integration with the surrounding neighbourhood and to minimise amenity impacts, and be designed to the satisfaction of the relevant authority. Where that infrastructure is intended to be located in public open space, the land required to accommodate that infrastructure will not be counted as contributing to open space requirements classified under Clause 52.01 or within the Clyde Development Contributions Plan.

R52 Utilities must be placed outside any conservation areas shown on Plan 6. Utilities must be placed outside of natural waterway corridors or on the outer edges these corridors to avoid disturbance to existing native vegetation, significant landform features (e.g. rock outcrops) and heritage sites, to the satisfaction of Melbourne Water and the responsible authority.

GUIDELINES

G37 Above-ground utilities should be located outside of key view lines and screened with vegetation, as appropriate.

G38 Design and placement of underground services in new or upgraded streets should utilise the service placement guidelines outlined in Appendix 4.5.

G39 Utility easements to the rear of lots should only be provided where there is no practical alternative.

Table 6 Retarding Basins

ID  Description  Location 

Area (Ha) &/or Corridor 

Widths ResponsibilityOutfall 4 WLRB TBC north of Ballorto Road 0.50 MWC

CC = City of Casey, DEPI = Department of Environment & Primary Industries, MWC= Melbourne Water Corporation

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

35CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.7 Infrastructure delivery & Staging

3.7.1 Precinct Infrastructure Plan

The Precinct Infrastructure Plan (PIP) at Appendix 4.1 (refer to Clyde DCP document) sets out the infrastructure and services required to meet the need of the proposed development within the precinct. The infrastructure items and and services are to be provided through a number of mechanisms including:

• Subdivision construction works by developers.

•Agreement under S173 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.

•Utility service provider requirements.

• The Clyde Development Contributions Plan, including separate chare areas for local items.

• Relevant development contributions from adjoining areas.

• Capital works projects by Council, State government agencies and non-government organizations.

•Works in Kind (WIK) projects undertaken by developers on behalf of Council or State government agencies.

3.7.2 Development Services Strategy

Drainage for the precinct is not covered by the Clyde Development Contributions Plan as the relevant authority for outfall drainage is Melbourne Water. Melbourne Water has prepared a Development Services Scheme (DSS) which applies to the precinct. Under the DSS developers are required to pay a levy for each developable hectare of land which is included in a planning permit application. The contribution will be used by Melbourne Water to cover the cost of constructing drainage assets provided for in the DSS and also land required for the drainage assets. Melbourne Water has advised that the DSS has been costed as follows:

• Civil works are based on engineering estimates of the costs of the various drainage works; and

•As a principle, land costs are based on the same land values as the Clyde Development Contributions Plan for consistency.

Like the Clyde Development Contributions Plan, the DSS is subject to indexation and adjustments. Civil works will be adjusted by the adjustment methodology explained in the DSS to keep pace with rising costs and land values will move in line (upwards or downwards) with movement in land values provided for in the Clyde Development Contributions Plan.

Alternative stormwater quality treatments may be provided subject to agreement with Melbourne Water and Council.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

36 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

3.7.3 Development Staging

REQUIREMENTS

R53

Development staging must provide for the timely provision and delivery of:

• Arterial road reservations.

• Connector streets and connector street bridges.

• Street links between properties, constructed to the property boundary.

• Connection of the on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle network.

R54 Streets must be constructed to property boundaries where an inter-parcel connection is intended or indicated in the structure plan, by any date or stage of development required or approved by the responsible authority.

GUIDELINES

G40

Staging will be determined largely by the development proposals on land within the precinct and the availability of infrastructure services. Within this context, the following should be achieved:

• Development staging should, to the extent practicable, be integrated with adjoining developments, through the timely provision of connecting roads and walking/cycling paths.

• Where development does not directly adjoin the urban edge, local open space should be provided in early stages to provide new residents with amenity.

• Access to each new lot must be via a sealed road.

G41 The early delivery of active open space, community facilities, local parks and playgrounds is encouraged within each neighbourhood and may be delivered in stages.

3.7.4 Subdivision Works by Developers

REQUIREMENTS

R55

Subdivision of land within the precinct must provide and meet the total cost of delivering the

following infrastructure:

• Connector roads and local streets.

• Local bus stop infrastructure (where locations have been agreed in writing by Public Transport Victoria).

• Landscaping of all existing and future roads and local streets.

• Intersection works and traffic management measures along arterial roads, connector streets, and local streets (except those included in the DCP).

• Council approved fencing and landscaping (where required) along arterial roads.

• Local shared, pedestrian and bicycle paths along local arterial roads, connector roads, utilities easements, local streets, waterways and within local parks including bridges, intersections, and barrier crossing points (except those included in the DCP).

• Bicycle parking as required in this document.

• Appropriately scaled lighting along all roads, major shared and pedestrian paths, and traversing public open space.

• Basic improvements to local parks and open space (refer open space delivery below).

• Local drainage system.

• Local street or pedestrian path crossings of waterways unless included in the DCP or outlined as the responsibility of another agency in the Precinct Infrastructure Plan.

• Infrastructure as required by utility service providers including water, sewerage, drainage (except where the item is funded through a Development Services Scheme), electricity, gas, and telecommunications.

R56 Any subdivision adjacent to the rail reservation should provide fencing, at full cost to the proponent, to the satisfaction of Public Transport Victoria.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

37CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

R57

OPENSPACEDELIVERYAll public open space (where not otherwise provided via the DCP) must be finished to a standard that satisfies the requirements of the responsible authority prior to the transfer of the public open space, including:

• Removal of all existing and disused structures, foundations, pipelines, and stockpiles.

• Clearing of rubbish and weeds, levelled, topsoiled and grassed with warm climate grass (unless conservation reserve requirements dictate otherwise).

• Provision of water tapping, potable and recycled water connection points. Sewer and gas and electricity connection points must also be provided to land identified as an active reserve or district-level passive open space.

• Planting of trees and shrubs.

• Provision of vehicular exclusion devices (fence, bollards, or other suitable method) and

• maintenance access points.

• Installation of park furniture including barbeques, shelters, furniture, rubbish bins, local scale playground equipment, local scale play areas, and appropriate paving to support these facilities, consistent with the type of public open space listed in the open space delivery guide (Table 5).

R58

Active open space required to be set aside by the DCP must be vested in the relevant authority in the following condition:

• Free from surface / protruding rocks and structures.

• Reasonably graded and / or topsoiled to create a safe and regular surface (with a maximum 1:6 gradient).

• Bare, patchy and newly graded areas seeded, top-dressed with drought resistant grass.

R59

With respect to the public open space contribution required by Clause 52.01 of the Casey Planning Scheme, this provision sets out the amount of land to be contributed by each property in the precinct and consequently where a cash contribution is required in lieu of land.

All land owners must provide a public open space contribution equal to 4% of the Net Developable Area (Residential and Town Centres) (NDAR) upon subdivision of land in accordance with the following:

• Where land is required for unencumbered open space purposes as shown on Plan 3 and specified in Table 1 and is equal to 4% of NDAR that land is to be transferred to Council at no cost.

• Where no land or less than 4% of NDAR is shown on Plan 3 and specified in Table 1, as required for unencumbered open space purposes a cash contribution is to be made to Council to bring the total open space contribution to a value equal to 4% of NDAR of that site.

• Where land required for unencumbered open space purposes as shown on Plan 3 and specified in Table 1 is more than 4% of NDAR, Council will pay an amount equivalent to the value of the additional land being provided by that proposed development.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

38 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

4.0 APPENDICES

4.1 Precinct Infrastructure PlanRefer to the Clyde DCP document.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

39CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

This page has been left intentionally blank

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

40 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

41CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

Prop Spec Budget

Railw

ay Corrid

or / 

Easemen

t

Waterway 

Corridor/W

etland

 / 

Retarding

Sportsfie

lds (activ

e op

en sp

ace) N/A

Local parks (p

assive 

open

 space)

Region

al parks (a

ctive 

open

 Spa

ce)

Net Devpt Area % of 

Precinct

Local Spo

rtsfields 

(acitve op

en sp

ace) % 

NDA

Local Parks (p

assive 

open

 space) % NDA

Total  Clause 52.01 Open 

Space Delivery Target %

DifferenceEquiv Land 

Area

Local town centre / Local 

Convenience Centre 

Total Net Residential Area  Ha (NRA)

NDHa Dwell / NRHa Dwellings

57‐1 11.96 3.90 8.06 85.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.00% ‐4.00% ‐0.323 8.064 8.06 16 12957‐2 11.94 0.59 3.87 7.48 81.33% 0.00% 17.32% 7.89% 4.00% 3.89% 0.291 7.481 7.48 16 12057‐3 9.71 0.06 9.65 74.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.62% 4.00% ‐3.37% ‐0.325 9.654 9.65 16 15457‐4 9.61 1.03 8.58 56.14% 0.00% 27.34% 12.00% 4.00% 8.01% 0.687 2.0000 6.580 6.58 16 10557‐5 24.39 3.28 1.45 19.66 83.76% 0.00% 0.00% 7.38% 4.00% 3.38% 0.664 19.657 19.66 16 31557‐6 40.47 1.32 0.59 38.56 74.12% 0.00% 7.33% 1.53% 4.00% ‐2.47% ‐0.952 38.561 38.56 16 61757‐7 1.09 1.09 96.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.00% ‐4.00% ‐0.044 1.092 1.09 16 17

rail corridor 0.89 0.89 0.00 79.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.00% ‐4.00% 0.000 0.000 0.00 16 0

TOTAL 110.06 0.89 4.60 0.00 3.72 7.76 93.09 79.40% 0.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 2.000 91.088 91.088 1,457                  

Encumbered Open Space Available for Recreation

Other Land UsesUnencumbered Open Space Available for 

RecreationClause 52.01 Open Space Delivery 

PSP PROPERTY IDTOTAL AREA (HECTARES)

Residential ‐ GeneralTransport

Total N

et Develop

able Area 

(Hectares)

Key Percentages Local Unencumbered Open Space

Page 1 of 1Page 1 of 1

4.2 Property Specific Land Budget

4.3

Tow

n Ce

ntre

Des

ign

Prin

cipl

es

PR

INC

IPL

ES

LOC

AL

TOW

N C

ENTR

ES

Prin

cipl

e 1

Prov

ide

ever

y ne

ighb

ourh

ood

with

a v

iabl

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re a

s a

focu

s of

the

com

mun

ity w

ith a

fine

gra

in,

clos

ely

spac

ed d

istr

ibut

ion

patt

ern.

• D

eliv

er a

fine

gra

in d

istrib

utio

n pa

tter

n of

hig

hly

acce

ssib

le L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

s gen

eral

ly o

n a

scal

e of

one

Loc

al To

wn

Cent

re fo

r eve

ry n

eigh

bour

hood

of 8

,000

to 1

0,00

0 pe

ople

.•

Loca

te L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

s with

a d

istrib

utio

n pa

tter

n of

aro

und

one

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

for e

very

squa

re m

ile (2

.58k

m2)

of r

esid

entia

l dev

elop

men

t.•

Del

iver

a n

etw

ork

of e

cono

mic

ally

via

ble

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

s in

clud

ing

a su

perm

arke

t and

sup

port

ing

com

petit

ive

loca

l sho

ppin

g bu

sines

s, m

edic

al, l

eisu

re, r

ecre

atio

n an

d co

mm

unity

nee

ds w

hile

al

low

ing

oppo

rtun

ities

for l

ocal

spec

ialis

atio

n.

Prin

cipl

e 2

Loca

te L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

s on

a c

onne

ctor

str

eet

inte

rsec

tion

with

acc

ess

to a

n ar

teria

l roa

d an

d tr

ansi

t st

op.

• Lo

cate

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

on

an a

rter

ial/c

onne

ctor

inte

rsec

tion

and

ensu

re th

at th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re is

cen

tral

to th

e re

siden

tial c

atch

men

t tha

t it s

ervi

ces w

hile

opt

imisi

ng o

ppor

tuni

ties f

or

pass

ing

trad

e.•

Loca

te th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re w

ith fu

ture

railw

ay st

atio

ns o

r oth

er fo

rms o

f tra

nsit

stop

s to

bene

fit th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re a

nd to

offe

r con

veni

ence

for p

ublic

tran

spor

t pas

seng

ers.

• O

ther

Loc

al To

wn

Cent

re lo

catio

ns m

ay b

e co

nsid

ered

whe

re th

e lo

catio

n re

sults

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re b

eing

cen

tral

to th

e re

siden

tial c

atch

men

t tha

t it s

erve

s and

/or t

he lo

catio

n in

corp

orat

es

natu

ral o

r cul

tura

l lan

dsca

pe fe

atur

es su

ch a

s riv

ers a

nd c

reek

s, tre

e ro

ws,

topo

grap

hic

feat

ures

or o

ther

her

itage

stru

ctur

es w

hich

ass

ist in

cre

atin

g a

sens

e of

pla

ce.

Prin

cipl

e 3

Loca

te L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

s in

an

attr

activ

e se

ttin

g so

th

at m

ost p

eopl

e liv

e w

ithin

a w

alka

ble

catc

hmen

t of a

Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re a

nd re

late

to th

e ce

ntre

as

the

focu

s of

the

neig

hbou

rhoo

d.

• En

sure

that

80-

90%

of h

ouse

hold

s are

with

in a

1km

wal

kabl

e ca

tchm

ent o

f a lo

cal o

r hig

her o

rder

Tow

n Ce

ntre

.•

Loca

te L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

s in

attr

activ

e se

ttin

gs a

nd in

corp

orat

e na

tura

l or c

ultu

ral la

ndsc

ape

feat

ures

such

cree

ks a

nd w

ater

way

s, lin

ear o

pen

spac

e, p

edes

tria

n an

d cy

cle

links

and

are

as o

f hig

h ae

sthe

tic

valu

e.•

The

desig

n of

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

shou

ld re

spec

t exi

stin

g vi

ews a

nd v

istas

to a

nd fr

om th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re lo

catio

n.

Prin

cipl

e 4

Prov

ide

a fu

ll ra

nge

of lo

cal c

omm

unity

and

oth

er

faci

litie

s in

clud

ing

a su

perm

arke

t, sh

ops,

med

ical

and

recr

eatio

n us

es.

• La

nd u

ses s

houl

d be

loca

ted

gene

rally

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith th

e lo

catio

ns a

nd g

ener

al la

nd u

se te

rms i

dent

ified

on

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

Con

cept

Pla

n.•

The

desig

n of

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

shou

ld fa

cilit

ate

deve

lopm

ent w

ith a

hig

h de

gree

of c

omm

unity

inte

ract

ion

and

prov

ide

a vi

bran

t and

via

ble

mix

of r

etai

l, rec

reat

ion

and

com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies.

• Th

e cr

eatio

n of

land

use

pre

cinc

ts w

ithin

the

cent

re is

enc

oura

ged

to fa

cilit

ate

the

clus

terin

g of

use

s. Fo

r exa

mpl

e a ‘

med

ical

pre

cinc

t’ w

here

sim

ilar o

r syn

ergi

stic

use

s sho

uld

be si

ted

toge

ther

to p

rom

ote

stro

nger

trad

ing

patt

erns

.•

The

desig

n of

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

shou

ld a

lso e

ncou

rage

a p

atte

rn o

f sm

alle

r sca

le in

divi

dual

tena

ncie

s and

land

ow

ners

hip

patt

erns

with

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re to

att

ract

inve

stm

ent a

nd e

ncou

rage

gr

eate

r div

ersit

y an

d op

port

uniti

es fo

r loc

al b

usin

ess i

nves

tmen

t.•

The

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

shou

ld g

ener

ally

be

anch

ored

by

one

full

line

supe

rmar

ket a

nd su

ppor

ted

by sp

ecia

lty st

ores

unl

ess o

ther

wise

not

ed o

n th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re C

once

pt P

lan.

• Su

perm

arke

ts a

nd o

ther

com

mer

cial

or c

omm

unity

anc

hors

or s

econ

dary

anc

hors

with

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re sh

ould

be

loca

ted

diag

onal

ly o

ppos

ite o

ne a

noth

er a

cros

s the

mai

n st

reet

and

/or t

own

squa

re to

pro

mot

e de

sire

lines

that

max

imise

ped

estr

ian

mov

emen

t with

in th

e pu

blic

real

m.

• A

smal

l acc

ess m

all t

hat a

ddre

ss a

supe

rmar

ket/

othe

r ‘lar

ge b

ox u

ses’

may

be

cons

ider

ed a

s par

t of t

he o

vera

ll des

ign.

Suc

h ac

cess

mal

ls m

ay h

ave

a lim

ited

num

ber o

f int

erna

lised

shop

s. Th

e pr

imar

y acc

ess

to th

e m

all s

houl

d be

from

the

mai

n st

reet

and

/or t

he to

wn

squa

re.

• Ac

tive

build

ing

front

ages

shou

ld a

ddre

ss th

e m

ain

stre

et a

nd to

wn

squa

re to

max

imise

exp

osur

e to

pas

sing

trad

e, a

nd p

rom

ote

pede

stria

n in

tera

ctio

n.•

Shop

front

s sho

uld

have

var

ying

wid

ths a

nd fl

oor s

pace

are

as to

pro

mot

e a

dive

rsity

of t

radi

ng o

ppor

tuni

ties t

hrou

ghou

t the

Loc

al To

wn

Cent

re.

• Fl

exib

le fl

oor s

pace

s (in

clud

ing

floor

to c

eilin

g he

ight

s) sh

ould

be

inco

rpor

ated

into

bui

ldin

g de

sign

to e

nabl

e lo

calis

ed c

omm

erci

al u

ses t

o lo

cate

am

ongs

t the

act

ivity

of t

he L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

. •

Mix

ed U

se p

reci

ncts

shou

ld p

rovi

de re

tail

and/

or o

ffice

at g

roun

d le

vel, a

nd o

ffice

, com

mer

cial

and

resid

entia

l abo

ve g

roun

d le

vel.

• Ch

ildca

re, m

edic

al c

entre

s and

spec

ialis

ed a

ccom

mod

atio

n (e

.g. a

ged

care

/nur

sing

hom

e, st

uden

t acc

omm

odat

ion,

and

serv

iced

apa

rtm

ents

) sho

uld

be lo

cate

d w

ithin

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

and

at t

he

edge

of t

he L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

to c

ontr

ibut

e to

the

activ

ity o

f the

cen

tre a

nd so

thes

e us

es a

re c

lose

to th

e se

rvic

es o

ffere

d by

the

cent

re.

• Ca

r par

king

are

as sh

ould

be

loca

ted

cent

rally

to th

e sit

e an

d to

the

rear

and

or s

ide

of st

reet

bas

ed re

tail

front

ages

.•

Car p

arki

ng a

reas

shou

ld b

e de

signe

d to

acc

omm

odat

e fle

xibl

e us

es a

nd a

llow

for l

ong

term

dev

elop

men

t opp

ortu

nitie

s.•

Publ

ic to

ilets

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed in

loca

tions

whi

ch a

re sa

fe a

nd a

cces

sible

and

with

in th

e m

anag

ed a

rea

of th

e pr

oper

ty.

APP

END

IX A

- LO

CAL

TOW

N C

ENTR

E G

UID

ELIN

ES

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

43CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

Prin

cipl

e 5

Focu

s on

a p

ublic

spa

ce a

s th

e ce

ntre

of c

omm

unity

life.

• A

publ

ic sp

ace

whi

ch a

cts a

s the

cent

ral m

eetin

g pl

ace

with

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re m

ust b

e pr

ovid

ed. T

his p

ublic

spac

e m

ay ta

ke th

e fo

rm o

f a to

wn

squa

re, t

own

park

, pub

lic p

laza

spac

e, p

ublic

mar

ket

plac

e or

a si

mila

r loc

ally

resp

onsiv

e op

tion.

• Th

e pu

blic

spac

e sh

ould

be

loca

ted

in a

pos

ition

whe

re th

e ke

y us

es o

f the

Loc

al To

wn

Cent

re a

re d

irect

ly fo

cuse

s on

this

publ

ic sp

ace

to e

nsur

e th

at it

is a

dyn

amic

and

act

ivat

ed sp

ace.

• Th

e pu

blic

spac

e sh

ould

be

desig

ned

to fu

nctio

n as

the

iden

tifiab

le ‘c

entre

’ or ‘h

eart

’ with

a d

istin

ctiv

e lo

cal c

hara

cter

for b

oth

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

and

the

broa

der r

esid

entia

l cat

chm

ent.

• Th

e pu

blic

spac

e sh

ould

be

desig

ned

as a

flex

ible

and

ada

ptab

le sp

ace

so th

at a

rang

e of

use

s can

occ

ur w

ithin

this

spac

e at

any

one

tim

e. S

uch

uses

may

incl

ude

peop

le a

cces

sing

thei

r dai

ly sh

oppi

ng a

nd

busin

ess n

eeds

as w

ell a

s pro

vidi

ng a

spac

e w

here

soci

al in

tera

ctio

n, re

laxa

tion,

cel

ebra

tions

and

tem

pora

ry u

ses (

such

as s

talls

, exh

ibiti

ons a

nd m

arke

ts) c

an o

ccur

.•

The

publ

ic sp

ace

shou

ld b

e w

ell i

nteg

rate

d w

ith p

edes

tria

n an

d cy

cle

links

aro

und

and

thro

ugh

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

so th

at th

e pu

blic

spac

e ac

ts a

s a ‘g

atew

ay’ to

the

activ

ity o

f the

cen

tre.

• Th

e m

ain

publ

ic sp

ace

or to

wn

squa

re w

ithin

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

shou

ld h

ave

a m

inim

um a

rea

of 5

00sq

m. S

mal

ler p

ublic

spac

es w

hich

are

inte

grat

ed w

ithin

the

built

form

des

ign,

are

surro

unde

d by

ac

tive

front

ages

and

faci

litat

e hi

gh le

vels

of p

edes

tria

n m

ovem

ent a

re a

lso e

ncou

rage

d.•

Foot

path

wid

ths w

ithin

and

aro

und

the

publ

ic sp

ace

as w

ell a

s alo

ng th

e m

ain

stre

et sh

ould

be

suffi

cien

t to

prov

ide

for p

edes

tria

n an

d m

obili

ty a

cces

s as w

ell a

s pro

vide

for o

utdo

or d

inin

g an

d sm

alle

r ga

ther

ing

spac

es.

Prin

cipl

e 6

Inte

grat

e lo

cal e

mpl

oym

ent a

nd s

ervi

ce o

ppor

tuni

ties

in a

bus

ines

s fr

iend

ly e

nviro

nmen

t.

• A

varie

ty o

f em

ploy

men

t and

bus

ines

s opp

ortu

nitie

s sho

uld

be p

lann

ed th

roug

h th

e pr

ovisi

on o

f a b

road

mix

of l

and

uses

and

com

mer

cial

act

iviti

es.

• A

rang

e of

opt

ions

and

loca

tions

for o

ffice

bas

ed b

usin

esse

s sho

uld

be p

rovi

ded

with

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re.

• Se

rvic

es a

nd fa

cilit

ies t

o su

ppor

t hom

e ba

sed

and

smal

ler b

usin

esse

s are

enc

oura

ged

with

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re.

• Ap

prop

riate

loca

tions

for s

mal

l offi

ce/h

ome

office

(‘SO

HO

’) ho

usin

g op

tions

whi

ch m

axim

ise th

e ac

cess

and

exp

osur

e to

the

activ

ity o

f the

Loc

al To

wn

Cent

re sh

ould

be

cons

ider

ed a

s par

t of t

he d

esig

n pr

oces

s.

Prin

cipl

e 7

Incl

ude

a ra

nge

of m

ediu

m a

nd h

igh

dens

ity h

ousi

ng

and

othe

r for

ms

of re

side

ntia

l use

s w

ithin

and

surr

ound

ing

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

.

• M

ediu

m a

nd h

igh

dens

ity h

ousin

g in

and

aro

und

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

is re

quire

d to

pro

vide

pas

sive

surv

eilla

nce,

con

trib

ute

to th

e lif

e of

the

cent

re a

nd to

max

imise

the

amen

ity o

f the

cen

tre.

• M

ediu

m a

nd h

igh

dens

ity h

ousin

g sh

ould

est

ablis

h in

loca

tions

of h

igh

amen

ity a

roun

d th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re a

nd b

e co

nnec

ted

to th

e ac

tivity

of t

he L

ocal

Tow

n Ce

ntre

thro

ugh

stro

ng p

edes

tria

n an

d cy

cle

links

.•

A ra

nge

of h

ousin

g ty

pes f

or a

cro

ss se

ctio

n of

the

com

mun

ity (s

uch

as re

tirem

ent l

ivin

g) sh

ould

be

incl

uded

in a

nd a

roun

d th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re.

• Sp

ecia

lised

acc

omm

odat

ion

(suc

h as

age

d/nu

rsin

g ca

re, s

tude

nt a

ccom

mod

atio

n an

d se

rvic

ed a

part

men

ts) i

s enc

oura

ged

at th

e ed

ge o

f Loc

al To

wn

Cent

res w

ith st

rong

ped

estr

ian

and

cycl

e lin

ks to

th

e ce

ntra

l act

ivity

are

a of

the

Tow

n Ce

ntre

. •

The

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

des

ign

shou

ld a

void

pot

entia

l lan

d us

e co

nflic

ts b

etw

een

resid

entia

l and

com

mer

cial

use

s by

focu

sing

on re

tail

oper

atio

ns o

n th

e m

ain

stre

et a

nd a

roun

d th

e to

wn

squa

re a

nd

loca

ting

resid

entia

l use

s pre

dom

inan

tly a

t the

edg

e of

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

and

/or o

n up

per l

evel

s.•

Refe

r to

the

Smal

l Lot

Hou

sing

Code

for f

urth

er in

form

atio

n ab

out h

ousin

g re

quire

men

ts fo

r sm

all l

ots a

roun

d Lo

cal T

own

Cent

res.

Prin

cipl

e 8

Des

ign

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

to b

e pe

dest

rian

frie

ndly

an

d ac

cess

ible

by

all m

odes

incl

udin

g pu

blic

tran

spor

t,

whi

le e

nabl

ing

priv

ate

vehi

cle

acce

ss.

• Th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re sh

ould

be

easil

y, di

rect

ly a

nd sa

fely

acc

essib

le fo

r ped

estr

ians

, cyc

lists

, pub

lic tr

ansp

ort m

odes

, priv

ate

vehi

cles

, ser

vice

and

del

iver

y ve

hicl

es w

ith p

riorit

y gi

ven

to p

edes

tria

n m

ovem

ent,

amen

ity, c

onve

nien

ce a

nd sa

fety

.•

The

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

shou

ld p

rovi

de a

per

mea

ble

netw

ork

of st

reet

s, w

alkw

ays a

nd p

ublic

spac

es th

at p

rovi

de li

nkag

es th

roug

hout

the

cent

re a

nd d

esig

nate

d pe

dest

rian

cros

sing

poin

ts.

• Th

e m

ain

stre

et sh

ould

be

desig

ned

to c

ompl

y w

ith th

e re

leva

nt c

ross

sect

ions

foun

d w

ithin

the

Prec

inct

Str

uctu

re P

lan.

• A

spee

d en

viro

nmen

t of 4

0km

/h o

r les

s sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

for t

he le

ngth

of t

he m

ain

stre

et.

• Pu

blic

tran

spor

t inf

rast

ruct

ure/

faci

litie

s sho

uld

be p

lann

ed fo

r com

mut

er fr

iend

ly/c

onve

nien

t loc

atio

ns w

ithin

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

.•

Bus s

tops

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rt P

ublic

Tran

spor

t Gui

delin

es fo

r Lan

d U

se a

nd D

evel

opm

ent,

to th

e sa

tisfa

ctio

n of

Pub

lic Tr

ansp

ort V

icto

ria.

• Bi

cycl

e pa

rkin

g sh

ould

be

prov

ided

with

in th

e st

reet

net

wor

k an

d pu

blic

spac

es in

hig

hly

visib

le lo

catio

ns a

nd c

lose

to p

edes

tria

n de

sire

lines

and

key

des

tinat

ions

.•

Supe

rmar

ket a

nd o

ther

‘larg

e fo

rmat

’ bui

ldin

gs sh

ould

not

impe

de o

n th

e m

ovem

ent o

f peo

ple

arou

nd th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re.

• Ke

y bu

ildin

gs w

ithin

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d to

enc

oura

ge p

edes

tria

n m

ovem

ent a

long

the

leng

th o

f the

stre

et th

roug

h pu

blic

spac

es.

• Th

e de

sign

of b

uild

ings

with

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re sh

ould

hav

e a

rela

tions

hip

with

and

shou

ld in

terfa

ce to

the

publ

ic st

reet

net

wor

k.•

Car p

arki

ng a

reas

shou

ld b

e de

signa

ted

to e

nsur

e pa

ssiv

e su

rvei

llanc

e an

d pu

blic

safe

ty th

roug

h ad

equa

te p

ositi

onin

g an

d lig

htin

g.•

Car p

arki

ng a

reas

shou

ld b

e de

signe

d to

pro

vide

ded

icat

ed p

edes

tria

n ro

utes

and

are

as o

f lan

dsca

ping

.•

On

stre

et c

ar p

arki

ng sh

ould

be

prov

ided

eith

er a

s par

alle

l or a

ngle

par

king

to e

ncou

rage

shor

t sta

y pa

rkin

g.•

Car p

arki

ng in

gres

s and

egr

ess c

ross

over

s sho

uld

be g

roup

ed a

nd li

mite

d.•

Car p

arki

ng in

gres

s or e

gres

s and

car

par

king

are

as a

ccom

mod

atin

g he

avy

vehi

cle

mov

emen

ts sh

ould

be

desig

ned

to li

mit

the

pede

stria

n/ve

hicl

e co

nflic

t.•

Hea

vy v

ehic

le m

ovem

ents

(i.e

. load

ing

and

deliv

erie

s) sh

ould

be

loca

ted

to th

e re

ar a

nd o

r sid

e of

stre

et b

ased

reta

il fro

ntag

es•

Stre

ets,

publ

ic sp

aces

and

car

par

ks sh

ould

be

wel

l lit

to A

ustr

alia

n st

anda

rds a

nd w

ith p

edes

tria

n fri

endl

y (g

ener

ally

whi

te) l

ight

. Lig

htin

g sh

ould

be

desig

ned

to a

void

unn

eces

sary

spill

to th

e sid

e or

ab

ove.

• Al

l pub

lic sp

aces

shou

ld re

spon

d ap

prop

riate

ly to

the

desig

n fo

r mob

ility

acc

ess p

rinci

ples

.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

44 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

Prin

cipl

e 9

Crea

te a

sen

se o

f pla

ce w

ith h

igh

qual

ity e

ngag

ing

urba

n de

sign

.

• D

evel

opm

ent s

houl

d co

mpl

emen

t and

enh

ance

the

char

acte

r of t

he su

rroun

ding

are

a by

resp

ondi

ng a

ppro

pria

tely

to k

ey v

isual

cue

s ass

ocia

ted

with

the

topo

grap

hy o

f the

Loc

al To

wn

Cent

re lo

catio

n an

d its

surro

unds

.•

The

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

des

ign

shou

ld se

ek to

min

imise

am

enity

and

noi

se im

pact

s res

ultin

g fro

m th

e m

ix o

f use

s by

mai

ntai

ning

sepa

ratio

n an

d tr

ansit

iona

l are

as b

etw

een

reta

il an

d ho

usin

g ac

tiviti

es,

such

as o

pen

spac

e, ro

ad n

etw

orks

and

com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies.

• Th

e de

sign

of e

ach

build

ing

shou

ld c

ontr

ibut

e to

a c

ohes

ive

and

legi

ble

char

acte

r for

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

as a

who

le.

• Si

tes i

n pr

omin

ent l

ocat

ions

(suc

h as

at k

ey in

ters

ectio

ns, s

urro

undi

ng p

ublic

spac

es a

nd te

rmin

atin

g ke

y vi

ew li

nes a

nd v

istas

) sho

uld

be id

entifi

ed fo

r sig

nific

ant b

uild

ings

or l

andm

ark

stru

ctur

es.

• Th

e de

sign

of b

uild

ing

front

ages

shou

ld in

corp

orat

e th

e us

e of

a c

onsis

tent

cov

ered

wal

kway

or v

eran

dah

to p

rovi

de fo

r wea

ther

pro

tect

ion.

• Th

e bu

ilt fo

rm sh

ould

defi

ne th

e m

ain

stre

et a

nd b

e al

igne

d w

ith th

e pr

oper

ty b

ound

ary.

• St

reet

faca

des a

nd a

ll vi

sible

side

or r

ear f

acad

es sh

ould

be

visu

ally

rich

, inte

rest

ing

and

wel

l art

icul

ated

and

be

finish

ed in

suita

ble

mat

eria

ls an

d co

lour

s tha

t con

trib

ute

to th

e ch

arac

ter o

f the

Loc

al

Tow

n Ce

ntre

. •

Corn

er si

tes,

whe

re th

e m

ain

stre

et m

eets

an

inte

rsec

ting

and/

or a

rter

ial r

oad

shou

ld:

• Be

des

igne

d to

pro

vide

bui

lt fo

rm th

at a

ncho

rs th

e m

ain

stre

et to

the

inte

rsec

ting

road

. Thi

s can

be

achi

eved

thro

ugh

incr

ease

d bu

ildin

g he

ight

, sca

le a

nd a

rtic

ulat

ed fr

onta

ges;

• In

corp

orat

e ei

ther

2 st

orey

bui

ldin

g or

2 st

orey

ele

men

ts (s

uch

as a

wni

ngs a

nd ro

of li

nes)

; •

Be d

evel

oped

to h

ave

a gr

ound

floo

r act

ive

front

age

and

activ

e flo

or sp

ace

com

pone

nt to

the

mai

n st

reet

fro

ntag

e; a

nd•

Not

be

deve

lope

d fo

r sta

ndar

d sin

gle

stor

ey fa

st fo

od o

utco

mes

. •

Mat

eria

ls an

d de

sign

elem

ents

shou

ld b

e co

mpa

tible

with

the

envi

ronm

ent a

nd la

ndsc

ape

char

acte

r of t

he b

road

er p

reci

nct.

• Th

e su

perm

arke

t and

seco

ndar

y an

chor

s sho

uld

have

fron

tage

s tha

t dire

ctly

add

ress

the

mai

n st

reet

and

/or t

own

squa

re so

that

the

use

inte

grat

es w

ith a

nd p

rom

otes

act

ivity

with

in th

e m

ain

stre

et a

nd

publ

ic sp

aces

/tho

roug

hfar

es.

• Su

perm

arke

ts o

r lar

ge fo

rmat

reta

il us

es w

ith a

fron

tage

to th

e m

ain

stre

et sh

ould

use

cle

ar g

lazi

ng to

allo

w v

iew

line

s int

o th

e st

ore

from

the

stre

et. (

Plan

ning

per

mits

for b

uild

ings

and

wor

ks sh

ould

co

nditi

on a

gain

st th

e us

e of

whi

te w

ashe

d w

indo

ws,

exce

ssiv

e w

indo

w a

dver

tisin

g an

d ob

trus

ive

inte

rnal

shel

ving

or ‘f

alse

wal

ls’ o

ffset

from

the

glaz

ing)

.•

Seco

ndar

y ac

cess

to th

e su

perm

arke

t fro

m c

ar p

arki

ng a

reas

shou

ld b

e co

nsid

ered

whe

re it

faci

litat

es c

onve

nien

t tro

lley

acce

ss a

nd d

oes n

ot d

imin

ish th

e ro

le o

f the

prim

ary

acce

ss fr

om th

e m

ain

stre

et

and

or to

wn

squa

re.

• Th

e de

sign

and

sitin

g of

supe

rmar

kets

and

oth

er ‘la

rge

form

at re

tail

uses

’ sho

uld

prov

ide

an a

ppro

pria

te re

spon

se to

the

entir

e pu

blic

dom

ain.

Thi

s inc

lude

s but

is n

ot li

mite

d to

car

par

king

are

as,

pred

omin

antly

rout

es a

nd st

reet

s.•

Reta

il us

es a

long

stre

et fr

onta

ges s

houl

d ge

nera

lly in

clud

e ac

cess

poi

nts a

t reg

ular

inte

rval

s to

enco

urag

e ac

tivity

alo

ng th

e le

ngth

of t

he st

reet

.•

Reta

il an

d co

mm

erci

al b

uild

ings

with

in th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re sh

ould

gen

eral

ly b

e bu

ilt to

the

prop

erty

line

.•

Publ

ic sp

aces

shou

ld b

e or

ient

ed to

cap

ture

nor

th su

n an

d pr

otec

t fro

m p

reva

iling

win

ds a

nd w

eath

er.

• La

ndsc

apin

g of

all

inte

rface

are

as sh

ould

be

of a

hig

h st

anda

rd a

s an

impo

rtan

t ele

men

t to

com

plem

ent t

he b

uilt

form

des

ign.

• U

rban

art

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e de

sign

of th

e pu

blic

real

m.

• St

reet

furn

iture

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d in

are

as th

at a

re h

ighl

y vi

sible

and

clo

se to

or a

djoi

ning

ped

estr

ian

desir

e lin

es/g

athe

ring

spac

es a

nd d

esig

ned

to a

dd v

isual

inte

rest

to th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re.

• W

rapp

ing

of c

ar p

arki

ng e

dges

with

bui

lt fo

rm, t

o im

prov

e st

reet

inte

rface

, sho

uld

be m

axim

ised.

• Ca

r par

king

are

as sh

ould

pro

vide

for a

ppro

pria

te la

ndsc

apin

g w

ith p

lant

ing

of c

anop

y tre

es a

nd d

edic

ated

ped

estr

ian

thor

ough

fare

s.•

Scre

enin

g of

cen

tral

ised

was

te c

olle

ctio

n po

ints

shou

ld m

inim

ise a

men

ity im

pact

s with

adj

oini

ng a

reas

and

use

rs o

f the

cen

tre.

• W

here

serv

ice

area

s are

acc

essib

le fr

om c

ar p

arks

, the

y sh

ould

pre

sent

a w

ell d

esig

ned

and

secu

re fa

cade

to p

ublic

are

as.

• M

echa

nica

l pla

nt a

nd se

rvic

e st

ruct

ure

roof

s sho

uld

be in

clud

ed w

ithin

roof

line

s or o

ther

wise

hid

den

from

vie

w.

Prin

cipl

e 10

Prom

ote

loca

lisat

ion,

sus

tain

abili

ty a

nd a

dapt

abili

ty.

• Th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re sh

ould

pro

mot

e th

e lo

calis

atio

n of

serv

ices

whi

ch w

ill c

ontr

ibut

e to

a re

duct

ion

of tr

avel

dist

ance

to a

cces

s loc

al se

rvic

es a

nd le

ss d

epen

denc

e on

the

car.

• Th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re sh

ould

be

desig

ned

to b

e sy

mpa

thet

ic to

its n

atur

al su

rroun

ds b

y:•

Inve

stig

atin

g th

e us

e of

ene

rgy

effici

ent d

esig

n an

d co

nstr

uctio

n m

etho

ds fo

r all

build

ings

;•

Incl

udin

g W

ater

Sen

sitiv

e U

rban

Des

ign

prin

cipl

es su

ch a

s int

egra

ted

stor

mw

ater

rete

ntio

n an

d re

use

(e.g

. toi

let fl

ushi

ng a

nd la

ndsc

ape

irrig

atio

n);

• Pr

omot

ing

safe

and

dire

ct a

cces

sibili

ty a

nd m

obili

ty w

ithin

and

to a

nd fr

om th

e Lo

cal T

own

Cent

re;

• In

clud

ing

optio

ns fo

r sha

de a

nd sh

elte

r thr

ough

a c

ombi

natio

n of

land

scap

e an

d bu

ilt fo

rm tr

eatm

ents

;•

Ensu

ring

build

ings

are

nat

ural

ly v

entil

ated

to re

duce

the

relia

nce

on p

lant

equ

ipm

ent f

or h

eatin

g an

d co

olin

g;•

Prom

otin

g pa

ssiv

e so

lar o

rient

atio

n in

the

confi

gura

tion

and

dist

ribut

ion

of b

uilt

form

and

pub

lic sp

aces

;•

Gro

upin

g w

aste

col

lect

ion

poin

ts to

max

imise

opp

ortu

nitie

s for

recy

clin

g an

d re

use;

• Pr

omot

ing

sola

r ene

rgy

for w

ater

and

spac

e he

atin

g, e

lect

ricity

gen

erat

ion

and

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l lig

htin

g; a

nd

• In

vest

igat

ing

othe

r opp

ortu

nitie

s for

the

built

form

to re

duce

gre

enho

use

gas e

miss

ions

ass

ocia

ted

with

the

occu

patio

n an

d th

e on

goin

g us

e of

bui

ldin

gs.

• En

cour

age

build

ing

desig

n w

hich

can

be

adap

ted

to a

ccom

mod

ate

a va

riety

of u

ses o

ver t

ime.

• En

sure

the

Loca

l Tow

n Ce

ntre

has

an

inbu

ilt c

apac

ity fo

r gro

wth

and

cha

nge

to e

nabl

e ad

apta

tion

and

the

inte

nsifi

catio

n of

use

s as t

he n

eeds

of t

he c

omm

unity

evo

lve.

Prin

cipl

e 11

Prom

ote

publ

ic tr

ansp

ort u

se..

• Fa

cilit

ate

safe

and

effi

cien

t ope

ratio

n of

pub

lic tr

ansp

ort a

nd b

us se

rvic

es.

• En

cour

age

use

of p

ublic

tran

spor

t by

loca

ting

bus s

tops

in lo

catio

ns w

hich

are

acc

essib

le, s

afe

and

conv

enie

nt.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

45CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

4.4

Stre

et C

ross

Sec

tions

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

46 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

47CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

48 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

49CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

50 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

51CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

52 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

53CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

54 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

55CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

56 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

57CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

58 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

59CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

60 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

4.5 Service Placement Guidelines STANDARDROADCROSSSECTIONS

Figures 003 and 004 in the Engineering Design and Construction Manual for Subdivision in Growth Areas (April 2011) outline placement of services for a typical residential street environment. This approach is appropriate for the majority of the ‘standard’ road cross sections outlined in Appendix C containing grassed nature strips, footpaths and road pavements.

NON-STANDARDROADCROSSSECTIONS

To achieve greater diversity of streetscape outcomes in Melbourne’s growth areas, which enhances character and amenity of these new urban areas, non-standard road cross sections are required. Non-standard road cross sections will also be necessary to address local needs, such as fully sealed verges for high pedestrian traffic areas in town centres and opposite schools. This PSP contains suggested non-standard ‘variation’ road cross sections, however other non-standard outcomes are encouraged.

For non-standard road cross sections where service placement guidance outlined in Figure 003 and 004 in the Engineering Design and Construction Manual for Subdivision in Growth Areas (April 2011) is not applicable, the following service placement guidelines will apply.

UNDER PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT

UNDER NATURE STRIPS

DIRECTLY UNDER TREES1

UNDER KERB

UNDER ROAD

PAVEMENT

WITHIN ALLOTMENTS

NOTES

SEWER Preferred Possible Possible No Possible Possible3

POTABLE WATER

Possible4 Preferred Preferred No No NoCan be placed in combined trench with gas

RECYCLED WATER

Possible4 Preferred Preferred No No No

GAS Possible4 Preferred Preferred No No No

Can be placed in combined trench with potable water

ELECTRICITY Preferred4 Possible Possible No No No

Pits to be placed either fully in footpath or nature strip

FTTH/TELCO Preferred4 Possible Possible No No No

Pits to be placed either fully in footpath or nature strip

DRAINAGE Possible Possible Possible Preferred Preferred Possible3

TRUNK SERVICES

Possible Possible Possible Possible Preferred No

NOTES 1 Trees are not to be placed directly over property service connections 2 Placement of services under road pavement is to be considered when service cannot be accommodated

elsewhere in road reserve. Placement of services beneath edge of road pavement/parking bays is preferable to within traffic lanes

3 Where allotment size/frontage width allows adequate room to access and work on a pipe 4 Where connections to properties are within a pit in the pedestrian pavement/footpath

GENERALPRINCIPLESFORSERVICEPLACEMENT

• Place gas and water on one side of road, electricity on the opposite side

• Place water supply on the high side of road

• Place services that need connection to adjacent properties closer to these properties

• Place trunk services further away from adjacent properties

• Place services that relate to the road carriageway (eg. drainage, street light electricity supply) closer to the road carriageway

•Maintain appropriate services clearances and overlap these clearances wherever possible

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

61CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

4.6 Open Space Category GuideCITYOFCASEYCITYDRAFTPARKCLASSIFICATIONS&EMBELLISHMENTLIST

PASSIVERECREATIONPARK

A park that provides opportunities for a variety of recreational and social activities in a green space setting. Passive Recreation park’s come in a variety of landforms, and in many cases provide opportunities to protect and enhance landscape amenity.

NEIGHBOURHOOD

• Passive recreation park suitable for local recreation/social activities

• Junior play emphasis

•Attracts users from the local area (ie 400m catchment)

• Recreational/social facilities suitable for local activities/events.

•Minimal support facilities (seats, bin etc)

• Footpath/bikeway links

DISTRICT(1HAORGREATER)

• Passive recreation park suitable for district-level recreation/social activities

• Junior and youth play emphasis

•Attracts users from the district (ie 2km catchment)

• Recreational/social facilities suitable for district activities/events.

• Basic support facilities eg. amenities, BBQ, Picnic tables, shelters, seats etc)

• Footpath/bikeway links

MUNICIPAL(5HAORGREATER)

•Major passive recreation park suitable for Citywide recreation/social events

•Attracts users from municipality and adjacent municipalities

• Capacity to sustain high level recreational/social use (5000+) over long periods

•High level recreational/social facilities suitable for Citywide events.

• Junior and youth play emphasis

•High level support facilities eg parking, amenities (toilets), signage

• Footpath/bikeway links

• Public transport

• Car spaces (on and off street)

• Bus Spaces (on and off street)

REGIONAL

•Major passive recreation park suitable for regional recreation/social events

• Capacity to sustain high level recreational/social use (10000+) over long periods

•High level recreational/social facilities suitable for regional events.

• Junior and youth play emphasis

•High level support facilities eg parking, amenities, signage

• Footpath/bikeway links

• Public transport

• Car spaces (off street)

• Bus Spaces (off street)

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

62 CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

LINEARPARK

To provide pedestrian/cyclist links in a parkland setting.

A park that is developed and used for pedestrian and cyclist access, both recreational and commuter, between residential areas and key community destinations such as recreational facilities, schools and other community facilities, public transport and places of work. Linear Reserves are generally linear in nature and follow existing corridors such as water courses and roads. They usually contain paths or tracks (either formal or informal) that form part of a wider path/track network. While the primary function of Linear Reserve is pedestrian & cyclist access, these parks may serve additional purpose such as storm water conveyance, fauna movement and ecological/biodiversity protection.

NEIGHBOURHOOD

• Park corridor that provides local link

•Attracts users from the local area (ie 400m catchment)

• Capacity to sustain low level accessibility over short periods

•Minor access facilities eg path

• Footpath/bikeway links

DISTRICT

•Major park corridor that provides district link

•Attracts users from the district (ie 2 km catchment)

• Capacity to sustain moderate level accessibility over long periods

• Basic access facilities eg path, signage

• Footpath/bikeway links

MUNICIPAL

•Major park corridor that provides metropolitan link

•Attracts users from municipality and adjacent municipalities

• Capacity to sustain high level accessibility over long periods

•High level access facilities eg paths, signage, shade, water fountains

• Footpath/bikeway links

• Public transport

• Car spaces (on street)

• Bus Spaces (on street)

REGIONAL

•Major park corridor that provides regional link

• Capacity to sustain high level accessibility over long periods

•High level access facilities eg paths, signage, shade, water fountains

• Footpath/bikeway links

• Public transport

• Car spaces (on and off street)

• Bus Spaces (on and off street)

TOWNSQUARE/URBANPARK

(Area equal to or less than 0.3ha or unless otherwise designated)

A passive recreation park providing opportunities for a variety of recreational and social activities in an urban setting. They are located predominantly in medium to high density residential area and mixed use centres or corridors. They provide an important role in meeting the passive recreation needs of residents, workers and visitors in activity centres and/or medium to high density residential areas.

Town squares are to be predominately hard landscaped, while urban parks have less hardstand than town squares, but more than traditional neighbourhood passive recreation parks. Urban parks also offer the opportunity for low key kick and throw activities a small turfed area.

GREENVALE CENTRAL PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN

63CASEY FIELDS SOUTH PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN