11
Caught On The Rise Caught On The Rise Escalators chewing up dollars Escalators chewing up dollars and sense” and sense” A Case Study by Kevin Chao, Sarah Oaks, A Case Study by Kevin Chao, Sarah Oaks, Lee Rommes, & Sarah Thomas Lee Rommes, & Sarah Thomas Valley River Center, Eugene, Oregon. March 19 Valley River Center, Eugene, Oregon. March 19 th th , , 2007 2007

Caught On The Rise

  • Upload
    tadita

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Caught On The Rise. “Escalators chewing up dollars and sense” A Case Study by Kevin Chao, Sarah Oaks, Lee Rommes, & Sarah Thomas Valley River Center, Eugene, Oregon. March 19 th , 2007. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Caught On The Rise

Caught On The Caught On The RiseRise““Escalators chewing up dollars and sense”Escalators chewing up dollars and sense”A Case Study by Kevin Chao, Sarah Oaks, A Case Study by Kevin Chao, Sarah Oaks,

Lee Rommes, & Sarah ThomasLee Rommes, & Sarah Thomas

Valley River Center, Eugene, Oregon. March 19Valley River Center, Eugene, Oregon. March 19 thth, 2007, 2007

Page 2: Caught On The Rise

IntroductionIntroduction

Escalators are a great convenience, but Escalators are a great convenience, but what do they cost us? For our case what do they cost us? For our case study, we explored how much time the study, we explored how much time the mall escalators at the Valley River Center mall escalators at the Valley River Center were being used, directly reflecting what were being used, directly reflecting what percentage of the energy put into the percentage of the energy put into the escalator is wasted on a daily basis. escalator is wasted on a daily basis.

Page 3: Caught On The Rise

PrecedentPrecedent

12-hour use interval12-hour use interval[$1.488/h (cooling) + $0.414 (motor)] x 12 hours = [$1.488/h (cooling) + $0.414 (motor)] x 12 hours =

$22.824 per day$22.824 per day

On a yearOn a year$22.824 per day x 365 = $8,330.76$22.824 per day x 365 = $8,330.76

Team OtisCOOL TOOLS Dallas, TXJanuary 27, 2007

A case study by: Walter Grondzik, Daniel Faoro, & Alison Kwok

Page 4: Caught On The Rise

HypothesisHypothesis

Constantly running Constantly running escalators are not escalators are not occupied during occupied during 50% of observed - - 50% of observed - - - business hours, - business hours, resulting in energy resulting in energy losses. losses.

Page 5: Caught On The Rise

ECSers in Action!!!ECSers in Action!!!

Page 6: Caught On The Rise

General InformationGeneral InformationEnergy Prices

Monthly Service Charge $28.25

Demand Charge $5.00/kW

Energy Charge$0.04479/

kWh(Commercial Energy Rate: http://www.eweb.org/news/projects/rates.htm)

Escalator Specifications

Step Width 32"

Rise 14'

Motor 5 HP(MEEB reference pg. 1472)

Page 7: Caught On The Rise

Data/ObservationsData/ObservationsMinutes of Escalator Occupancy

DateTime Period Up (min.)

Down (min.)

Thursday (3/8) 4:15-5:15 PM 13:29 12:05

Friday (3/9)12:00-1:00

PM 24:44 28:21

Friday (3/9) 1:00-2:00 PM 26:53 28:17

Saturday (3/10) 3:30-3:40 PM 31:27 32:15

Sunday (3/11) 3:10-4:10 PM 25:48 25:04

Sunday (3/11) 4:47-5:47 PM 13:04 13:42

Page 8: Caught On The Rise

AnalysisAnalysis

Page 9: Caught On The Rise

ConclusionConclusionEscalator Resource Misappropriation

Utilized Not Utilized

Money $735.52 $1,184.90

Energy 10883.398 kWh 17532.786 kWh

After reviewing the data, we have found that we met our hypothesis that the escalators were being used less than 50% of the time at the Valley River Center Mall; therefore the escalator is not properly designed for the space and wastes energy when not in use.

Page 10: Caught On The Rise

Thank YouThank You

Team Otis; Walter Grondzik, Daniel Faoro, & Alison Kwok

Ady Leverette

Page 11: Caught On The Rise

Question & AnswerQuestion & Answer

It’s that time again!