Caux Round Table statement on BP and the Gulf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Caux Round Table statement on BP and the Gulf

    1/2

    1

    Caux Round Table Statement

    July 15, 2010

    BP and the Gulf of Mexico A Way Forward to Restore Modern Capitalism?

    The Caux Round Table (CRT) today described the BP crisis in the Gulf of Mexico as

    fundamentally a governance failure and called on corporations to take the lead in preventing

    such failures by embracing a more responsible and moral form of capitalism.

    CRT Chair Dr Noel Purcell stated that the failure of BP to prevent and, subsequently, to be able

    to control the massive oil leak from their well in the bed of the Gulf of Mexico, demonstrates

    the need for more enlightened and improved corporate management of risks.

    The environmental and social harms precipitated by the Gulf of Mexico crisis parallels the

    economic and social harms triggered by poor risk management on the part of banking firms in

    the lead up to the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. In both cases, risk management wascompromised as senior corporate officers and boards of directors failed to closely monitor and

    control the widening of risk parameters as the limits of technology, on the one hand, and of

    financial leverage on the other, were pushed to extremes.

    Recognizing that management of risks and stakeholder impacts determines the quality of a

    companys responsibility and resilience, the Caux Round Table has pioneered development of a

    new approach to management of such obligations.

    The approach recognizes that risk is inherent, not just to business, but to the human condition,

    which always seeks to apply intelligence and creativity to use of our resources. It recognizes

    that the need of business and humanity is to manage risk and not to foolishly seek itselimination. An equilibrium embracing a range of acceptable risks is the goal of the approach.

    This is especially needed in free market environments where the propensity of modern

    business is to accelerate risk taking through invention of new technologies and new methods of

    financial intermediation.

    Finding the right level of risk invokes application of sound judgment and so needs to be placed

    with persons of wisdom and good character, who possess a sense for history and understand

    the frailties of human nature and the role of the common good.

    Capitalism is the best means to positively channel humanitys access to needed resources,

    both natural and financial, especially in the form of successful enterprise. But equally,irresponsible capitalism ultimately causes material harm economically, socially and

    environmentally said Dr. Noel Purcell, CRT Chair.

    As experienced by the banks and now by BP, poorly handled risk management that results in

    material social harm, directly leads to the re-issuance of societys license to operate on new and

    more restrictive terms. Most often, these new restrictions are placed in the law and in

    regulatory supervision of key business decisions. Just recently, the United States Congress

  • 8/9/2019 Caux Round Table statement on BP and the Gulf

    2/2

    2

    adopted new laws limiting the entrepreneurial freedoms of financial firms. And the Obama

    Administration has required BP to contribute US$20 billion to a fund for payment of damages

    caused by the oil gushing into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

    Therefore, to maximize the scope of their licenses from society, responsible private firms need

    enhanced techniques to enable their boards of directors to exercise fiduciary attention over awide range of risk possibilities. Society trusts more those firms that act ethically and

    responsibility, permitting them greater flexibility to seek profitable business opportunities.

    It is the responsibility of boards of directors to watch the pots that might boil over and scald all

    about them. Management of risk is too important to be left to staff professionals. Poorly

    managed risk threatens the fundamental financial value of the enterprise and so preserving

    enterprise value through proper stewardship of risk is a fundamental board responsibility, Dr.

    Purcell said.

    The CRT risk assessment process, titled Arcturus, also recognizes the enormity of such

    responsibility in large modern multi-national corporations engaged in complex, far-flungoperations. It enables boards of directors, in timely fashion, to gain accurate assessments of a

    companys risk profile.

    The Arcturus process is simple but subtle. It permits boards and senior managers to monitor

    future developments of concern to stakeholders. It builds on the proven lessons of quality

    management, which after all, was a most successful enhancement of risk management issues.

    The Arcturus process engages the experience and the judgments of directors, senior managers

    and line professionals. It surfaces concerns that a companys quality of performance is at risk

    and helps prevent it being compromised by short-sighted views of risk.

    For more information on Arcturus, contact Stephen B. Young, CRT Global Executive Director at:

    [email protected]

    +1 651 223 2852

    and by mail at

    The Caux Round Table

    Six West Fifth St, Suite 300M

    Saint Paul, MN 55102 USA