CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    1/21

    1

    CE 232 Earthquake Engineering

    SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE REPORT

    Submitted by

    Eduardo M. Oroz Jr.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    2/21

    2

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Internal Structure of the Earth.3

    Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics..5

    Rupture of fault and Earthquakes.7

    Other sources of Earthquakes..10

    Location of Earthquakes.12

    Size and Measurement of Earthquakes13

    Modification of Earthquake due to the Nature of Soil..16

    Earthquake Damage to Structures..17

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    3/21

    3

    Internal Structure of the Earth

    Three Parts of Earth's Interior

    Knowledge of earth's interior is essential for understanding plate tectonics. A good

    analogy for teaching about earth's interior is a piece of fruit with a large pit such as a peach or aplum. Most students are familiar with these fruits and have seen them cut in half.

    If we cut a piece of fruit in half we will see that it is composed of three parts: 1) a very

    thin skin, 2) a seed of significant size located in the center, and 3) most of the mass of the fruit

    being contained within the flesh. Cutting the earth we would see: 1) a very thin crust on the

    outside, 2) a core of significant size in the center, and 3) most of the mass of the Earth contained

    in the mantle.

    Earth's Crust

    There are two different types of crust: thin oceanic crust that underlies the ocean basins

    and thicker continental crust that underlies the continents. These two different types of crust are

    made up of different types of rock. The thin oceanic crust is composed of primarily of basalt and

    the thicker continental crust is composed primarily of granite. The low density of the thick

    continental crust allows it to "float" in high relief on the much higher density mantle below.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    4/21

    4

    Earth's Mantle

    Earth's mantle is thought to be composed mainly of olivine-rich rock. It has different

    temperatures at different depths. The temperature is lowest immediately beneath the crust and

    increases with depth. The highest temperatures occur where the mantle material is in contact

    with the heat-producing core. This steady increase of temperature with depth is known as thegeothermal gradient. The geothermal gradient is responsible for different rock behaviors and the

    different rock behaviors are used to divide the mantle into two different zones. Rocks in the

    upper mantle are cool and brittle, while rocks in the lower mantle are hot and soft (but not

    molten). Rocks in the upper mantle are brittle enough to break under stress and produce

    earthquakes. However, rocks in the lower mantle are soft and flow when subjected to forces

    instead of breaking. The lower limit of brittle behavior is the boundary between the upper and

    lower mantle.

    Earth's Core

    Earth's Core is thought to be composed mainly of an iron and nickel alloy. This

    composition is assumed based upon calculations of its density and upon the fact that many

    meteorites are iron-nickel alloys. The core is earth's source of internal heat because it contains

    radioactive materials which release heat as they break down into more stable substances.

    The core is divided into two different zones. The outer core is a liquid because the

    temperatures there are adequate to melt the iron-nickel alloy. However, the inner core is a solid

    even though its temperature is higher than the outer core. Here, tremendous pressure, produced

    by the weight of the overlying rocks is strong enough to crowd the atoms tightly together and

    prevents the liquid state.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    5/21

    5

    Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics

    Continental Drift

    Continental drift is the movement of the Earth's continents relative to each other, thus

    appearing to drift across the ocean bed. The speculation that continents might have 'drifted' was

    first put forward by Abraham Ortelius in 1596. The concept was independently and more fully

    developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912, but his theory was rejected by some for lack of a

    mechanism (though this was supplied later by Holmes) and others because of prior theoretical

    commitments. The idea of continental drift has been subsumed by the theory of plate tectonics,

    which explains how the continents move.

    Plate Tectonics

    The continents drift slowly (the timescale for substantial change is 10-100 million years),

    but that they drift at all is remarkable. The following figure illustrates the structure of the first

    100-200 kilometers of the Earth's interior, and provides an answer to this question.

    The crust is thin, varying from a few tens of kilometers thick beneath the continents to to

    less than 10 km thick beneath the many of the oceans. The crust and upper mantle together

    constitute the lithosphere, which is typically 50-100 km thick and is broken into large plates (not

    illustrated). These plates sit on the aesthenosphere.

    The aesthenosphere is kept plastic (deformable) largely through heat generated by

    radioactive decay. The material that is decaying is primarily radioactive isotopes of light

    elements like aluminum and magnesium. This heat source is small on an absolute scale (the

    corresponding heat flow at the surface out of the Earth is only about 1/6000 of the solar energy

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    6/21

    6

    falling on the surface). Nevertheless, because of the insulating properties of the Earth's rocks this

    is sufficient to keep the aesthenosphere plastic in consistency.

    Plate tectonics (from the Late Latin tectonicus, from the Greek: "pertaining to

    building") is a scientific theory that describes the large-scale motion of Earth's lithosphere. This

    theoretical model builds on the concept of continental drift which was developed during the firstfew decades of the 20th century. The geoscientific community accepted the theory after the

    concepts of seafloor spreading were later developed in the late 1950s and early 1960s.

    The lithosphere and the aesthenosphere

    The lithosphere, which is the rigid outermost shell of a planet (on Earth, the crust and

    upper mantle), is broken up into tectonic plates. On Earth, there are seven or eight major plates

    (depending on how they are defined) and many minor plates. Where plates meet, their relative

    motion determines the type of boundary; convergent, divergent, or transform. Earthquakes,

    volcanic activity, mountain-building, and oceanic trench formation occur along these plate

    boundaries. The lateral relative movement of the plates typically varies from zero to 100 mm

    annually.

    Tectonic plates are composed of oceanic lithosphere and thicker continental lithosphere,

    each topped by its own kind of crust. Along convergent boundaries, subduction carries plates

    into the mantle; the material lost is roughly balanced by the formation of new (oceanic) crust

    along divergent margins by seafloor spreading. In this way, the total surface of the globe remains

    the same. This prediction of plate tectonics is also referred to as the conveyor belt principle.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    7/21

    7

    Earlier theories (that still have some supporters) propose gradual shrinking (contraction) or

    gradual expansion of the globe.

    Tectonic plates are able to move because the Earth's lithosphere has greater strength than

    the underlying asthenosphere. Lateral density variations in the mantle result in convection. Plate

    movement is thought to be driven by a combination of the motion of the seafloor away from thespreading ridge (due to variations in topography and density of the crust, which result in

    differences in gravitational forces) and drag, with downward suction, at the subduction zones.

    Another explanation lies in the different forces generated by the rotation of the globe and the

    tidal forces of the Sun and Moon. The relative importance of each of these factors and their

    relationship to each other is unclear, and still the subject of much debate.

    Rupture of Fault and Earthquakes

    Rupture of Faults

    A fault is a break in the earth's crust along which movement can take place causing an

    earthquake. In Utah, movement along faults is mostly vertical; mountain blocks (for example, the

    Wasatch Range) move up relative to the downward movement of valley blocks (for example, the

    Salt Lake Valley).

    Faults with evidence of Holocene (about 10,000 years ago to present) movement are the

    main concern because they are most likely to generate future earthquakes. If the earthquake is

    large enough, surface fault rupture can occur.

    With a large earthquake (about magnitude 6.5 and greater), the fault rupture can reach

    and displace the ground surface, forming a fault scarp (steep break in slope). The resulting faultscarp may be several inches to 20 feet in height, and up to about 40 miles in length, depending

    on the size of the earthquake.

    An area hundreds of feet wide can be affected, called the zone of deformation, which

    occurs chiefly on the downthrown side of the main fault and encompasses multiple minor faults,

    cracks, local tilting, and grabens (downdropped blocks between faults). Buildings in the zone of

    deformation would be damaged, particularly those straddling the main fault.

    Also, anything crossing the fault, such as transportation corridors, utilities, and other

    lifelines, both underground and above ground, can be damaged or broken. The ground can be

    dropped below the water table on the downdropped side, resulting in localized flooding.

    Surface fault rupture can also cause tectonic subsidence, which is the broad, permanent

    tilting of the valley floor down toward the fault scarp. Tilting can cause flooding along lake and

    reservoir shorelines nearest the fault; along altered stream courses; and along canals, sewer lines,

    or other gravity-flow systems where slope gradients are lessened or reversed.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    8/21

    8

    Earthquake fault types

    There are three main types of fault, all of which may cause an interplate earthquake:

    normal, reverse (thrust) and strike-slip. Normal and reverse faulting are examples of dip-slip,

    where the displacement along the fault is in the direction of dip and movement on them involves

    a vertical component. Normal faults occur mainly in areas where the crust is being extended suchas a divergent boundary. Reverse faults occur in areas where the crust is being shortened such as

    at a convergent boundary. Strike-slip faults are steep structures where the two sides of the fault

    slip horizontally past each other; transform boundaries are a particular type of strike-slip fault.

    Many earthquakes are caused by movement on faults that have components of both dip-slip and

    strike-slip; this is known as oblique slip.

    Reverse faults, particularly those along convergent plate boundaries are associated with

    the most powerful earthquakes, megathrust earthquakes, including almost all of those of

    magnitude 8 or more. Strike-slip faults, particularly continental transforms can produce major

    earthquakes up to about magnitude 8. Earthquakes associated with normal faults are generallyless than magnitude 7.

    This is so because the energy released in an earthquake, and thus its magnitude, is

    proportional to the area of the fault that ruptures and the stress drop. Therefore, the longer the

    length and the wider the width of the faulted area, the larger the resulting magnitude. The

    topmost, brittle part of the Earth's crust, and the cool slabs of the tectonic plates that are

    descending down into the hot mantle, are the only parts of our planet which can store elastic

    energy and release it in fault ruptures. Rocks hotter than about 300 degrees Celsius flow in

    response to stress; they do not rupture in earthquakes. The maximum observed lengths of

    ruptures and mapped faults, which may break in one go are approximately 1000 km. Examplesare the earthquakes in Chile, 1960; Alaska, 1957; Sumatra, 2004, all in subduction zones. The

    longest earthquake ruptures on strike-slip faults, like the San Andreas Fault (1857, 1906), the

    North Anatolian Fault in Turkey (1939) and the Denali Fault in Alaska (2002), are about half to

    one third as long as the lengths along subducting plate margins, and those along normal faults are

    even shorter.

    The most important parameter controlling the maximum earthquake magnitude on a fault

    is however not the maximum available length, but the available width because the latter varies by

    a factor of 20. Along converging plate margins, the dip angle of the rupture plane is very

    shallow, typically about 10 degrees. Thus the width of the plane within the top brittle crust of theEarth can become 50 to 100 km (Japan, 2011; Alaska, 1964), making the most powerful

    earthquakes possible.

    Strike-slip faults tend to be oriented near vertically, resulting in an approximate width of

    10 km within the brittle crust, thus earthquakes with magnitudes much larger than 8 are not

    possible. Maximum magnitudes along many normal faults are even more limited because many

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    9/21

    9

    of them are located along spreading centers, as in Iceland, where the thickness of the brittle layer

    is only about 6 km.

    In addition, there exists a hierarchy of stress level in the three fault types. Thrust faults

    are generated by the highest, strike slip by intermediate and normal faults by the lowest stress

    levels. This can easily be understood by considering the direction of the greatest principal stress,the direction of the force that 'pushes' the rock mass during the faulting. In the case of normal

    faults, the rock mass is pushed down in a vertical direction, thus the pushing force (greatest

    principal stress) equals the weight of the rock mass itself. In the case of thrusting, the rock mass

    'escapes' in the direction of the least principal stress, namely upward, lifting the rock mass up,

    thus the overburden equals the least principal stress. Strike-slip faulting is intermediate between

    the other two types described above. This difference in stress regime in the three faulting

    environments can contribute to differences in stress drop during faulting, which contributes to

    differences in the radiated energy, regardless of fault dimensions.

    Earthquake

    An earthquake (also known as a quake, tremor or temblor) is the result of a sudden

    release of energy in the Earth's crust that creates seismic waves. The seismicity, seismism or

    seismic activity of an area refers to the frequency, type and size of earthquakes experienced over

    a period of time.

    Earthquakes are measured using observations from seismometers. The moment

    magnitude is the most common scale on which earthquakes larger than approximately 5 are

    reported for the entire globe. The more numerous earthquakes smaller than magnitude 5 reported

    by national seismological observatories are measured mostly on the local magnitude scale, alsoreferred to as the Richter magnitude scale. These two scales are numerically similar over their

    range of validity. Magnitude 3 or lower earthquakes are mostly almost imperceptible or weak

    and magnitudes 7 and over potentially cause serious damage over larger areas, depending on

    their depth. The largest earthquakes in historic times have been of magnitude slightly over 9,

    although there is no limit to the possible magnitude. The most recent large earthquake of

    magnitude 9.0 or larger was a 9.0 magnitude earthquake in Japan in 2011 (as of March 2014),

    and it was the largest Japanese earthquake since records began. Intensity of shaking is measured

    on the modified Mercalli scale. The shallower an earthquake, the more damage to structures it

    causes, all else being equal.

    At the Earth's surface, earthquakes manifest themselves by shaking and sometimes

    displacement of the ground. When the epicenter of a large earthquake is located offshore, the

    seabed may be displaced sufficiently to cause a tsunami. Earthquakes can also trigger landslides,

    and occasionally volcanic activity.

    In its most general sense, the word earthquake is used to describe any seismic event

    whether natural or caused by humans that generates seismic waves. Earthquakes are caused

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    10/21

    10

    mostly by rupture of geological faults, but also by other events such as volcanic activity,

    landslides, mine blasts, and nuclear tests. An earthquake's point of initial rupture is called its

    focus or hypocenter. The epicenter is the point at ground level directly above the hypocenter.

    Other Sources of Earthquakes

    Naturally occurring earthquakes

    Tectonic earthquakes occur anywhere in the earth where there is sufficient stored elastic

    strain energy to drive fracture propagation along a fault plane. The sides of a fault move past

    each other smoothly and aseismically only if there are no irregularities or asperities along the

    fault surface that increase the frictional resistance. Most fault surfaces do have such asperities

    and this leads to a form of stick-slip behaviour. Once the fault has locked, continued relative

    motion between the plates leads to increasing stress and therefore, stored strain energy in the

    volume around the fault surface. This continues until the stress has risen sufficiently to break

    through the asperity, suddenly allowing sliding over the locked portion of the fault, releasing thestored energy. This energy is released as a combination of radiated elastic strain seismic waves,

    frictional heating of the fault surface, and cracking of the rock, thus causing an earthquake. This

    process of gradual build-up of strain and stress punctuated by occasional sudden earthquake

    failure is referred to as the elastic-rebound theory. It is estimated that only 10 percent or less of

    an earthquake's total energy is radiated as seismic energy. Most of the earthquake's energy is

    used to power the earthquake fracture growth or is converted into heat generated by friction.

    Therefore, earthquakes lower the Earth's available elastic potential energy and raise its

    temperature, though these changes are negligible compared to the conductive and convective

    flow of heat out from the Earth's deep interior.

    Earthquakes away from plate boundaries

    Where plate boundaries occur within the continental lithosphere, deformation is spread

    out over a much larger area than the plate boundary itself. In the case of the San Andreas fault

    continental transform, many earthquakes occur away from the plate boundary and are related to

    strains developed within the broader zone of deformation caused by major irregularities in the

    fault trace (e.g., the "Big bend" region). The Northridge earthquake was associated with

    movement on a blind thrust within such a zone. Another example is the strongly oblique

    convergent plate boundary between the Arabian and Eurasian plates where it runs through the

    northwestern part of the Zagros mountains. The deformation associated with this plate boundaryis partitioned into nearly pure thrust sense movements perpendicular to the boundary over a wide

    zone to the southwest and nearly pure strike-slip motion along the Main Recent Fault close to the

    actual plate boundary itself. This is demonstrated by earthquake focal mechanisms.

    All tectonic plates have internal stress fields caused by their interactions with

    neighbouring plates and sedimentary loading or unloading (e.g. deglaciation). These stresses may

    be sufficient to cause failure along existing fault planes, giving rise to intraplate earthquakes.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    11/21

    11

    Shallow-focus and deep-focus earthquakes

    The majority of tectonic earthquakes originate at the ring of fire in depths not exceeding

    tens of kilometers. Earthquakes occurring at a depth of less than 70 km are classified as 'shallow-

    focus' earthquakes, while those with a focal-depth between 70 and 300 km are commonly termed

    'mid-focus' or 'intermediate-depth' earthquakes. In subduction zones, where older and colderoceanic crust descends beneath another tectonic plate, deep-focus earthquakes may occur at

    much greater depths (ranging from 300 up to 700 kilometers). These seismically active areas of

    subduction are known as Wadati-Benioff zones. Deep-focus earthquakes occur at a depth where

    the subducted lithosphere should no longer be brittle, due to the high temperature and pressure.

    A possible mechanism for the generation of deep-focus earthquakes is faulting caused by olivine

    undergoing a phase transition into a spinel structure.

    Rupture dynamics

    A tectonic earthquake begins by an initial rupture at a point on the fault surface, a processknown as nucleation. The scale of the nucleation zone is uncertain, with some evidence, such as

    the rupture dimensions of the smallest earthquakes, suggesting that it is smaller than 100 m while

    other evidence, such as a slow component revealed by low-frequency spectra of some

    earthquakes, suggest that it is larger. The possibility that the nucleation involves some sort of

    preparation process is supported by the observation that about 40% of earthquakes are preceded

    by foreshocks. Once the rupture has initiated it begins to propagate along the fault surface. The

    mechanics of this process are poorly understood, partly because it is difficult to recreate the high

    sliding velocities in a laboratory. Also the effects of strong ground motion make it very difficult

    to record information close to a nucleation zone.

    Rupture propagation is generally modeled using a fracture mechanics approach, likening

    the rupture to a propagating mixed mode shear crack. The rupture velocity is a function of the

    fracture energy in the volume around the crack tip, increasing with decreasing fracture energy.

    The velocity of rupture propagation is orders of magnitude faster than the displacement velocity

    across the fault. Earthquake ruptures typically propagate at velocities that are in the range 70

    90% of the S-wave velocity and this is independent of earthquake size. A small subset of

    earthquake ruptures appear to have propagated at speeds greater than the S-wave velocity. These

    supershear earthquakes have all been observed during large strike-slip events. The unusually

    wide zone of coseismic damage caused by the 2001 Kunlun earthquake has been attributed to the

    effects of the sonic boom developed in such earthquakes. Some earthquake ruptures travel atunusually low velocities and are referred to as slow earthquakes. A particularly dangerous form

    of slow earthquake is the tsunami earthquake, observed where the relatively low felt intensities,

    caused by the slow propagation speed of some great earthquakes, fail to alert the population of

    the neighbouring coast, as in the 1896 Meiji-Sanriku earthquake.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    12/21

    12

    Tidal forces

    Research work has shown a robust correlation between small tidally induced forces and non-

    volcanic tremor activity.

    Earthquake clusters

    Most earthquakes form part of a sequence, related to each other in terms of location and

    time. Most earthquake clusters consist of small tremors that cause little to no damage, but there is

    a theory that earthquakes can recur in a regular pattern.

    Aftershocks

    An aftershock is an earthquake that occurs after a previous earthquake, the mainshock.

    An aftershock is in the same region of the main shock but always of a smaller magnitude. If an

    aftershock is larger than the main shock, the aftershock is redesignated as the main shock and the

    original main shock is redesignated as a foreshock. Aftershocks are formed as the crust aroundthe displaced fault plane adjusts to the effects of the main shock.

    Earthquake swarms

    Earthquake swarms are sequences of earthquakes striking in a specific area within a short

    period of time. They are different from earthquakes followed by a series of aftershocks by the

    fact that no single earthquake in the sequence is obviously the main shock, therefore none have

    notable higher magnitudes than the other. An example of an earthquake swarm is the 2004

    activity at Yellowstone National Park. In August 2012, a swarm of earthquakes shook Southern

    California's Imperial Valley, showing the most recorded activity in the area since the 1970s.

    Earthquake storms

    Sometimes a series of earthquakes occur in a sort of earthquake storm, where the

    earthquakes strike a fault in clusters, each triggered by the shaking or stress redistribution of the

    previous earthquakes. Similar to aftershocks but on adjacent segments of fault, these storms

    occur over the course of years, and with some of the later earthquakes as damaging as the early

    ones. Such a pattern was observed in the sequence of about a dozen earthquakes that struck the

    North Anatolian Fault in Turkey in the 20th century and has been inferred for older anomalous

    clusters of large earthquakes in the Middle East.

    Location of Earthquakes

    The primary purpose of a seismometer is to locate the initiating points of earthquake

    epicenters. The secondary purpose, of determining the 'size' or Moment magnitude scale must be

    calculated after the precise location is known.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    13/21

    13

    The earliest seismographs were designed to give a sense of the direction of the first

    motions from an earthquake. The Chinese frog seismograph would have dropped its ball in the

    general compass direction of the earthquake, assuming a strong positive pulse. We now know

    that first motions can be in almost any direction depending on the type of initiating rupture (focal

    mechanism).

    The first refinement that allowed a more precise determination of the location, was the

    use of a time scale. Instead of merely noting, or recording, the absolute motions of a pendulum,

    the displacements were plotted on a moving graph, driven by a clock mechanism. This was the

    first seismogram, which allowed precise timing of the first ground motion, and an accurate plot

    of subsequent motions.

    From the first seismograms, as seen on the figure, it was noticed that the trace was

    divided into two major portions. The first seismic wave to arrive was the P-wave, followed

    closely by the S-wave. Knowing the relative 'velocities of propagation', it was a simple matter to

    calculate the distance of the earthquake.

    One seismograph would give the distance, but that could be plotted as a circle, with an

    infinite number of possibilities. Two seismographs would give two intersecting circles, with two

    possible locations. Only with a third seismograph would there be a precise location.

    The process of accurate location, was greatly improved with the advent of precise

    absolute timing. Early seismographs were almost always located at an astronomical observatory,

    just for the purpose of timing. See the history of the Canadian Dominion Observatory, is also the

    Geological Survey of Canada seismology laboratory. Recently, GPS is being used for accurate

    time, and seismometers can be located almost anywhere.

    Modern earthquake location still requires a minimum of three seismometers. Most likely,

    there are many, forming a seismic array. The emphasis is on precision, since much can be

    learned about the fault mechanics and seismic hazard, if the locations can be determined to

    within a kilometer or two, for small earthquakes. For this, computer programs use an iterative

    process, involving a 'guess and correction' algorithm. As well, a very good model of the local

    crustal velocity structure is required: seismic velocities vary with the local geology. For P-waves,

    the relation between velocity and bulk density of the medium has been quantified in Gardner's

    relation.

    Size and Measurement of Earthquakes

    Measuring and locating earthquakes

    Earthquakes can be recorded by seismometers up to great distances, because seismic

    waves travel through the whole Earth's interior. The absolute magnitude of a quake is

    conventionally reported by numbers on the moment magnitude scale (formerly Richter scale,

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    14/21

    14

    magnitude 7 causing serious damage over large areas), whereas the felt magnitude is reported

    using the modified Mercalli intensity scale (intensity IIXII).

    Every tremor produces different types of seismic waves, which travel through rock with

    different velocities:

    Longitudinal P-waves (shock- or pressure waves)

    Transverse S-waves (both body waves)

    Surface waves(Rayleigh and Love waves)

    Propagation velocity of the seismic waves ranges from approx. 3 km/s up to 13 km/s,

    depending on the density and elasticity of the medium. In the Earth's interior the shock- or P

    waves travel much faster than the S waves (approx. relation 1.7 : 1). The differences in travel

    time from the epicentre to the observatory are a measure of the distance and can be used to image

    both sources of quakes and structures within the Earth. Also the depth of the hypocenter can becomputed roughly.

    In solid rock P-waves travel at about 6 to 7 km per second; the velocity increases within

    the deep mantle to ~13 km/s. The velocity of S-waves ranges from 23 km/s in light sediments

    and 45 km/s in the Earth's crust up to 7 km/s in the deep mantle. As a consequence, the first

    waves of a distant earthquake arrive at an observatory via the Earth's mantle.

    On average, the kilometer distance to the earthquake is the number of seconds between

    the P and S wave times 8.[46] Slight deviations are caused by inhomogeneities of subsurface

    structure. By such analyses of seismograms the Earth's core was located in 1913 by Beno

    Gutenberg.

    Earthquakes are not only categorized by their magnitude but also by the place where they

    occur. The world is divided into 754 FlinnEngdahl regions (F-E regions), which are based on

    political and geographical boundaries as well as seismic activity. More active zones are divided

    into smaller F-E regions whereas less active zones belong to larger F-E regions.

    Standard reporting of earthquakes includes its magnitude, date and time of occurrence,

    geographic coordinates of its epicenter, depth of the epicenter, geographical region, distances to

    population centers, location uncertainty, a number of parameters that are included in USGS

    earthquake reports (number of stations reporting, number of observations, etc.), and a uniqueevent ID.

    Size of Earthquakes

    The magnitude is the most often cited measure of an earthquake's size, but it is not the

    only measure, and in fact, there are different types of earthquake magnitude. Early estimates of

    earthquake size were based on non-instrumental measures of the earthquakes effects. For

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    15/21

    15

    example, we could use values such as the number of fatalities or injuries, the maximum value of

    shaking intensity, or the area of intense shaking. The problem with these measures is that they

    don't correlate well. The damage and devastation produced by an earthquake will depend on its

    location, depth, proximity to populated regions, as well as its "true" size. Even for earthquakes

    close enough to population centers values such as maximum intensity and the area experiencing

    a particular level of shaking did not correlate well.

    In 1931 a Japanese seismologist named Kiyoo Wadati constructed a chart of maximumground motion versus distance for a number of earthquakes and noted that the plots for differentearthquakes formed parallel, curved lines (the larger earthquakes produced larger amplitudes).

    The fact that earthquakes of different size generated curves that were roughly parallel suggested

    that a single number could quantify the relative size of different earthquakes.

    In 1935 Charles Richter constructed a similar diagram of peak ground motion versus

    distance and used it to create the first earthquake magnitude scale (a logarithmic relationship

    between earthquake size and observed peak ground motion). He based his scale on an analogywith the stellar brightness scale commonly used in astronomy which is also similar to the pH

    scale used to measure acidity (pH is a logarithmic measure of the Hydrogen ion concentration in

    a solution).

    To complete the construction of the magnitude scale, Richter had to establish a reference

    value and identify the rate at which the peak amplitudes decrease with distance from an

    earthquake. He established a reference value for earthquake magnitude when he defined the

    magnitude as the base-ten logarithm of the maximum ground motion (in micrometers) recorded

    on a Wood-Anderson short-period seismometer one hundred kilometers from the earthquake.

    Richter was pragmatic in his definition, and chose a value for a magnitude zero that insured that

    most of the earthquakes routinely recorded would have positive magnitudes. Also, the Wood-

    Anderson short-period instrument that Richter chose for his reference records seismic waves

    with a period of about 0.8 seconds, roughly the vibration periods that we feel and that damage

    our buildings and other structures.

    Richter also developed a distance correction to account for the variation in maximum

    ground motion with distance from an earthquake (the dashed curves shown in the above diagram

    show his relationship for southern California). The precise rate that the peak ground motions

    decrease with distance depends on the regional geology and thus the magnitude scale for

    different regions is slightly dependent on the "distance correction curve".

    Thus originally, Richter's scale was specifically designed for application in southern

    California. Richter's method became widely used because it was simple, required only the

    location of the earthquake (to get the distance) and a quick measure of the peak ground motion,

    was more reliable than older measures such as intensity. It became widely used, well established,

    and forms the basis for many of the measures that we continue to use today. Generally the

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    16/21

    16

    magnitude is computed from seismographs from as many seismic recording stations as are

    available and the average value is used as our estimate of an earthquake's size.

    We call the Richter's original magnitude scale ML (for "local magnitude"), but the press

    usually reports all magnitudes as Richter magnitudes.

    Modification of Earthquake due to Nature of Soil

    Soil Conditions can have considerable effect on the shape of the surface motion response

    during earthquakes. Since the changes in the shape of the response spectra can have significant

    effects on the lateral forces on structures, it would seem desirable that the nature of soil

    conditions underlying a site be taken into account when evaluating the lateral forces for design

    purposes. It is also apparent that the most accurate information available on the dynamic

    properties of such soils should be used. While the information produced by Seed and Idriss has

    been shown to differ from that determined for this study, the caution that their data is only

    intended to be used as a guideline and considerable judgments may have to be exercised. Theysuggest using a range of material properties in the computations when equipment for the accurate

    determination of moduli and equivalent viscous damping factors is not available.

    The various site properties are extremely involved in controlling the response, since with

    increasing input acceleration the amplification factor decreases due to the higher damping

    employed in the softer soils. The highest amplification factors are generally associated with the

    weaker motions. This phenomenon has been observed by many researchers and writers.

    One aspect which cannot be bypassed is the influence of the characteristics of the base

    rock motion on ground response. Insufficient evidence is available to state categorically whether

    bedrock motions should be characterized by response spectra having a flat or a peakedform.

    Many writers believe the former to be a better representation. Regardless of the general form of

    the spectra the fact should not be overlooked that seemingly small peaks in the bedrock spectra

    are able to excite higher modes of vibration of the soil deposit producing a multi-peaked surface

    response. This phenomenon often occurs and in some cases the peak spectral value may be

    developed at a period corresponding to the predominant period of the bedrock motion. Perhaps

    the answer is to use a range of possible but realistic input motions to bracket the range of input

    accelerations.

    The non-linear soil properties give rise to a surface motion response spectrum whose

    peak spectral value and predominant period is dependent oon the magnitude of the maximum

    base rock acceleration. In a truly linear system, scaling the maximum input acceleration merely

    scales the peak spectral response by the same factor. The non-linearity of the soil strength

    properties precludes this simple scaling as a marked change in predominant period of the surface

    motion results and an analysis must be made to determine the full effect. In other words there is

    no simple relationship relating maximum input acceleration to predominant period and peak

    spectral velocity. Quantitatively, it is generally apparent, that deposits of deep soft soils tend to

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    17/21

    17

    produce ground motions having long period characteristics, while shallower deposits of stiff soils

    tend to produce shorter period ground motions.

    Clearly the level of understanding of surface layer modification of earthquake shear

    waves has reached the point where engineers may now use the results of research as a useful

    guide to evaluate the influence of soil condition on earthquake ground motions.

    Earthquake Damage to Structures

    Comparatively speaking, the absolute movement of the ground and buildings during an

    earthquake is not actually all that large, even during a major earthquake. That is, they do not

    usually undergo displacements that are large relative to the building's own dimensions. So, it is

    not the distance that a building moves which alone causes damage.

    Rather, it is because a building is suddenly forced to move very quickly that it suffers

    damage during an earthquake. Think of someone pulling a rug from beneath you. If they pull it

    quickly (i.e., accelerate it a great deal), then they needn't pull it very far to throw you off balance.

    On the other hand, if they pull the rug slowly and only gradually increase the speed of the rug,

    they can move (displace) it a great distance without that same unfortunate result.

    In other words, the damage that a building suffers primarily depends not upon its

    displacement, but upon acceleration. Whereas displacement is the actual distance the ground and

    the building may move during an earthquake, acceleration is a measure of how quickly they

    change speed as they move. During an earthquake, the speed at which both the ground and

    building are moving will reach some maximum. The more quickly they reach this maximum, the

    greater their acceleration.

    It's worthwhile mentioning here that in order to study the earthquake responses ofbuildings; many buildings in earthquake-prone regions of the world have been equipped withstrong motion accelerometers. These are special instruments which are capable of recording the

    accelerations of either the ground or building, depending upon their placement.

    The recording of the motion itself is known as an accelerogram. Figure below shows an

    accelerogram recorded in a hospital building parking lot during the Northridge, Californiaearthquake of January 17, 1994.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    18/21

    18

    In addition to providing valuable information about the characteristics of the particular

    earthquake recorded or the building where the accelerogram was recorded, accelerograms

    recorded in the past are also often used in the earthquake response analysis and earthquakedesign of buildings yet to be constructed.

    Newton's Law

    Acceleration has this important influence on damage, because, as an object in movement,

    the building obeys Newton' famous Second Law of Dynamics. The simplest form of the equationwhich expresses the Second Law of Motion is F = MA.

    This states the Force acting on the building is equal to the Mass of the building times the

    Acceleration. So, as the acceleration of the ground, and in turn, of the building, increase, so does

    the force which affects the building, since the mass of the building doesn't change.

    Of course, the greater the force affecting a building, the more damage it will suffer;

    decreasing F is an important goal of earthquake resistant design. When designing a new building,for example, it is desirable to make it as light as possible, which means, of course, that M, and inturn, F will be lessened. As we've seen in the discussion of Advanced Earthquake Resistant

    Techniques, various techniques are now also available for reducing A.

    Inertial Forces

    Acceleration, Inertial Forces

    It is important to note that F is actually what's known as an inertial force, that is, the force

    is created by the building's tendency to remain at rest, and in its original position, even thoughthe ground beneath it is moving. This is in accordance with another important physical law

    known as D'Alembert's Principle, which states that a mass acted upon by acceleration tends tooppose that acceleration in an opposite direction and proportionally to the magnitude of the

    acceleration.

    This inertial force F imposes strains upon the building's structural elements. These

    structural elements primarily include the building's beams, columns, load-bearing walls, floors,as well as the connecting elements that tie these various structural elements together. If these

    strains are large enough, the building's structural elements suffer damage of various kinds.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    19/21

    19

    Building Frequency and Period

    To begin with, as we discussed in the How Earthquakes Affect Buildings, the magnitudeof the building responsethat is, the accelerations which it undergoes depends primarily upon

    the frequencies of the input ground motion and the building's natural frequency. When these are

    near or equal to one another, the building's response reaches a peak level.

    In some circumstances, this dynamic amplification effect can increase the building

    acceleration to a value two times or more that of the ground acceleration at the base of thebuilding. Generally, buildings with higher natural frequencies, and a short natural period, tend to

    suffer higher accelerations but smaller displacement. In the case of buildings with lower natural

    frequencies, and a long natural period, this is reversed as the buildings will experience loweraccelerations but larger displacements.

    Building Stiffness

    The taller a building, the longer its natural period tends to be. But the height of a buildingis also related to another important structural characteristic: the building flexibility. Tallerbuildings tend to be more flexible than short buildings. (Only consider a thin metal rod. If it is

    very short, it is difficulty to bend it in your hand.

    If the rod is somewhat longer, and of the same diameter, it will become much easier to

    bend. Buildings behave similarly.) We say that a short building is stiff, while a taller building is

    flexible. (Obviously, flexibility and stiffness are really just the two sides of the same coin. Ifsomething is stiff, it isn't flexible and vice-versa.)

    Stiffness greatly affects the building's uptake of earthquake generated force. Reconsider

    our first example above, of the rigid stone block deeply founded in the soil. The rigid block ofstone is very stiff; as a result it responds in a simple, dramatic manner. Real buildings, of course,

    are more inherently flexible, being composed of many different parts.

    Furthermore, not only is the block stiff, it is brittle; and because of this, it cracks during

    the earthquake. This leads us to the next important structural characteristic affecting a building'searthquake response and performance and ductility.

    Ductility

    Ductility is the ability to undergo distortion or deformation bending, for example

    without resulting in complete breakage or failure. To take once again the example of the rigidblock in Figure 3, the block is an example of a structure with extremely low ductility. To see

    how ductility can improve a building's performance during an earthquake, consider figure below.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    20/21

    20

    Metal Rod Ductility

    For the block, we have substituted a combination of a metal rod and a weight. In response

    to the ground motion, the rod bends but does not break. (Of course, metals in general are more

    ductile than materials such as stone, brick and concrete.) Obviously, it is far more desirable for a

    building to sustain a limited amount of deformation than for it to suffer a complete breakage

    failure.

    The ductility of a structure is in fact one of the most important factors affecting its

    earthquake performance. One of the primary tasks of an engineer designing a building to be

    earthquake resistant is to ensure that the building will possess enough ductility to withstand the

    size and types of earthquakes it is likely to experience during its lifetime.

    Damping

    The last of the important structural characteristics, or parameters, which we'll discuss

    here is damping. As we noted earlier, ground and building motion during an earthquake has a

    complex, vibratory nature. Rather than undergoing a single "yank" in one direction, the building

    actually moves back and forth in many different horizontal directions

    All vibrating objects, including buildings, tend to eventually stop vibrating as time goes

    on. More precisely, the amplitude of vibration decays with time. Without damping, a vibrating

    object would never stop vibrating, once it had been set in motion. Obviously, different objects

    possess differing degrees of damping. A bean bag, for example, has high damping; a trampoline

    has low damping.

    In a building undergoing an earthquake, damping the decay of the amplitude of a

    building's vibrations is due to internal friction and the absorption of energy by the building's

    structural and nonstructural elements. All buildings possess some intrinsic damping.

    The more damping a building possesses, the sooner it will stop vibrating--which of

    course is highly desirable from the standpoint of earthquake performance. Today, some of the

    more advanced techniques of earthquake resistant design and construction employ added

    damping devices like shock absorbers to increase artificially the intrinsic damping of a building

    and so improve its earthquake performance.

  • 8/10/2019 CE232 Earthquake Engineering Report

    21/21

    21

    References

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake

    http://eqseis.geosc.psu.edu/~cammon/HTML/Classes/IntroQuakes/Notes/earthquake_size.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_location

    http://www.isr.umd.edu/~austin/aladdin.d/matrix-eq-spectra.html

    http://geology.utah.gov/utahgeo/hazards/eqfault/eqfault.htm

    http://mceer.buffalo.edu/infoservice/reference_services/buildingRespondEQ.asp