25
Central Auditory Processing Disorder

Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

Central Auditory Processing Disorder

Page 2: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

CONFUSION!Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD

or APD) can easily be misdiagnosed as . . .

Autism – no response to name or eye contact

Dyslexia – difficulty with phonics, slow reading

Deafness – dropping portions of words

Retardation – severely delayed learning

EBD – quiet, depressed, withdrawn behavior

Asperger Syndrome – pragmatic problems

AD/HD – distractible, poor following directions

Page 3: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

But CAPD is its own monster

Page 4: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

What is CAPD?

• “Central auditory processing disorders (CAPDs) are deficits in the information processing of audible signals not attributed to impaired peripheral hearing sensitivity or intellectual impairment” (Kirk, et al., 2000, p. 312).

• “ . . . primarily an ‘input’ disorder that affects specifically the way auditory information is processed at a variety of levels inside the central auditory nervous system” (Bellis, 2002, p. 30).

Page 5: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

CAPDis NOT related to the ear

or to higher cognitive processes

But may be related to

the auditory nerves

the primary auditory cortex

the auditory association cortex

or auditory hemispheric connections

Page 6: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

TYPES OF

CAPD

Page 7: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

#1 Auditory Decoding Deficit

• a language-dominant hemisphere dysfunction

• words are misheard

• poor auditory closure

• difficulty hearing with background noise

• poor syntax, semantics, phonemic decoding, phonological awareness, and auditory discrimination (da / ga)

Page 8: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

#2 Prosodic Deficit

• a right-hemispheric dysfunction

• inability to perceive tone-of-voice qualities

• misunderstanding of intent, humor, etc.

• monotone speaking, flat facial expressions, unusual speaking rhythms

• social isolation and depression

• poor sight-word reading, reading, spelling

• often comorbid with AD/HD

Page 9: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

#3 Integration Deficit

• a dysfunction in hemispheric integration• difficulty linking content of message with intent of

message• person feels that message was not heard

correctly or not understood• difficulty hearing in noise• difficulty with dual-hemispheric tasks, including

note taking, sports, piano• poor reading ability, sound-symbol association• attention problems

Page 10: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

#4 Associative Deficit

• an auditory receptive semantic deficit

• difficulty understanding message

• especially if message is complex

• especially if message is verbal

• word-finding difficulties

• begins to show itself around 3rd grade

• may be a type of aphasia

• probably originates in auditory association cortex or its link with primary auditory cortex

Page 11: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

#5 Output-Organization Deficit

• symptomatic of expressive language disorder

• difficulty formulating complex sentences• difficulty responding to questions or

following verbal instructions• severe difficulty hearing in noise• reflex of middle ear muscle is absent• comorbid with ADHD or other executive

function disabilities

Page 12: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

#6 Central Deafness

• results from the dysfunction of the auditory cortex regions of both hemispheres

• the person is truly deaf, although ears are fully functional

Page 13: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

#7 Auditory Neuropathy

• neurons of auditory nerve or lower brain stem do not fire synchronously

• difficulty with speech perception in noise

• possible hearing loss at variable levels

Page 14: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

KEEP IN MIND!

“. . . approximately 10 to 20 percent [of students with TBI] will have difficulty with central auditory processing . . .”

(Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., & Wehmeyer, M.L., 2006, p. 317)

Page 15: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

DIAGNOSIS

• the first step in diagnosing CAPD is determining that the child is not deaf

• an audiologist will then run a number of tests to discern the child’s level of auditory discrimination, as well as hemispheric tests, or other CAPD tests

• only an audiologist can diagnose CAPD

Page 16: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

TREATMENT

Direct TherapyEnvironmentalModification

CompensatoryStrategies

Page 17: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

Remediation

• In-school therapy performed by SLP

• Out-of-school therapy performed by certified clinician (Fast ForWord®)

• Out-of-school therapy performed by family (Earobics®)

Page 18: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

Two Highly-Rated Remediation Software Programs

Page 19: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

We the Teachers

• Speaking slowly is helpful for students with many types of CAPD

• Typical strategies include placing the student where he or she can see the teacher speaking and

• Using carpeted floors or other sound-muffling environmental modifications

• But many teaching techniques and modifications work for some types of CAPD but not for others, so that

• Understanding the student’s diagnosis is extremely important

Page 20: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

EXAMPLE: Note Taking

• Good for students with Associative Deficit

• Bad for students with Integration Deficit

• Bad for students with Prosodic Deficit

• Bad for students with Output-Organization Deficit

• Bad for students with Auditory Decoding Deficit

Page 21: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

more EXAMPLES

• An amplification unit may benefit a student with Auditory Decoding Deficit, but will not benefit a student with Prosodic Deficit

• Repetition may benefit a student with Auditory Decoding Deficit, but rephrasing may benefit a student with Associative Deficit

Page 22: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

KEEP IN MIND!

“APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284).

The child with CAPD must be categorized under speech/language impairment, LD, or another disability to qualify for special education within state laws

Accommodations can be made through Section 504 if the condition significantly interferes with the child’s education

Page 23: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

The CAPD Monster can be Tamed

Page 24: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

Recommended

Page 25: Central Auditory Processing Disorder · 2009. 2. 15. · “APD is not included in the IDEA definition of a child with a disability” (Bellis, 2002, p. 284). The child with CAPD

BibliographyAgocs, M.M., et al. (2006). Fast ForWord language. In McCauley & Fey,

pp. 471-508.

Bellis, T.J. (2002). When the brain can’t hear: Unraveling the mystery of

auditory processing disorder. NY: Atria.

Foli, K.J. (2002). Like sound through water: A mother’s journey through

auditory processing disorder. NY: Atria.

Kirk, S.A, Gallagher, J.J., & Anastasiow, N.J. (2000). Educating Exceptional

Children (9th Ed.). NY: Houghton Mifflin.

McCauley, R.J. & Fey, M.E. (Eds.) (2006). Treatment of language disorders in

children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Shin, L.M. (Ed.) (1998). Learning disabilities sourcebook. Detroit:

Omnigraphics.

Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R. & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2006). Exceptional lives:

Special education in today’s schools (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Merrill/Prentice Hall.