Central Ohio Technical College Services... · 2019-04-08 · Central Ohio Technical College Human Services Technology, Student Achievement Indicators Report SM10 32 14 44% 3 9% 17

Human Services Technology Program

Central Ohio Technical College

Last Updated: December 2018 - Through Autumn 2018

Tressa Arnold, MSW, LISW-S, HS-BCP

Human Services Technology Program Director/Instructor:

Joe Argiro, Resource Planning Analyst

[email protected] - [email protected] - 740.755.7651

The COTC Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness

by

Student Achievement Indicators Report

and

Human Services - Board Certified Instructor

[email protected] - 740.366.9470


Human Services Technology, Student Achievement Indicators Report

Page

2

2

2

3

3

3

4

5

7

7

7

8

9

12

13

14

15

16

17

19

25

1

Topic or Data

Student Demographics

Registered Credit Hours

Gender

Enrollment Status

Diversity

Age

Graduate Satisfaction, Graduate Feedback Survey - Department

County of Residence

Table of Contents

Employer Satisfaction, Employer Feedback Survey

Graduate Satisfaction, Graduate Feedback Survey - Student Life

Subsequent Education of Graduates - Student Tracker

Learning Outcomes

Grade Point Averages, Cumulative and Subject-specific

Graduate Time-to-Degree

Program Retention and Graduation Rates

Course Retention and Completion Rates

Practicums

Spring Terms

Autumn Terms

Enrollment

Application and Matriculation

Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness

December 2018

www.cotc.edu/cotcire

[email protected]



Age Groups COTC Human Services Technology

Under 21 54% 33%

21-30 31% 42%

31-40 9% 11%

41-50 4% 9%

51-60 1% 3%

61+ 1% 2%

*18AU Semester Census

Race COTC Human Services Technology

White 69% 79%

Black 9% 9%

Unknown 13% 7%

Two or More Races 4% 4%

Hispanic or Latino 2% 1%

Asian 2% 0%

American Indian/Alaskan Native 0% 0%

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0% 0%

Aggregate Minority Groups 8% 5%


2

AGE*

Source: Latest Census Source Report, COTC Overall and Pivot by Academic Program

DIVERSITY*


STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS - Autumn 2018

69%

9% 13%8%

79%

9% 7% 5%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

White Black Unknown Aggregate Minority GroupsRace

Autumn 2018 DiversityCOTC Population vs. Human Services Students

COTC Human Services Technology

54%

31%

9% 4% 1% 1%

33%

42%

11% 9% 3% 2%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Under 21 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61+Age Groups

Autumn 2018 Rate by Age GroupingsCOTC Population vs. Human Services Students

COTC Human Services Technology


December 2018


[email protected]



Status COTC Human Services Technology

Part-Time 79% 64%

Full-Time 21% 36%


Gender COTC Human Services Technology

Female 67% 86%

Male 33% 14%


Credits COTC Human Services Technology

Average Credit Hours 7.51 8.81

3

GENDER*


ENROLLMENT STATUS*


REGISTERED CREDIT HOURS*

Source: Semester Census Capture, Enrollment by Department


67%

86%33%

14%

0%

33%

67%

100%

COTC Human Services TechnologyGroups

Autumn 2018 Rates by GenderCOTC Population vs. Human Services Students

Female

Male

79%

64%

21% 36%

0%

33%

67%

100%


Autumn 2018 Rates by Enrollment StatusCOTC Population vs. Human Services Students

Part-Time

Full-Time

7.518.81

0.00

3.00

6.00

9.00

12.00


Autumn 2018 Average Registered Credit HoursCOTC Population vs. Human Services Students


December 2018


[email protected]



County COTC Human Services Technology

Licking 32% 37%

Coshocton 8% 14%

Knox 13% 16%

Franklin 23% 15%

All Other 24% 18%


COUNTY OF RESIDENCE*


32%

8%13%

23% 24%

37%

14%16%

15% 18%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Licking Coshocton Knox Franklin All OtherCounty of Residence

Autumn 2018 Enrollment by County of ResidenceCOTC Population vs. Human Services Students

COTCHuman Services Technology


December 2018


[email protected]



SM10 32 14 44% 3 9% 17 53%

AU10 66 36 55% 8 12% 44 67%

WI11 33 12 36% 7 21% 19 58%

SP11 33 14 42% 6 18% 20 61%

SM11 32 8 25% 9 28% 17 53%

AU11 62 31 50% 4 6% 35 56%

WI12 26 10 38% 5 19% 15 58%

SP12 47 22 47% 4 9% 26 55%

SM12 12 5 42% 2 17% 7 58%

12AU 93 30 32% 18 19% 48 52%

13SP 49 20 41% 6 12% 26 53%

13SM 38 27 71% 2 5% 29 76%

13AU 60 24 40% 6 10% 30 50%

14SP 40 18 45% 7 18% 25 63%

14SM 22 8 36% 4 18% 12 55%

14AU 37 18 49% 4 11% 22 59%

15SP 54 15 28% 9 17% 24 44%

15SM 25 9 36% 3 12% 12 48%

15AU 74 29 39% 9 12% 38 51%

16SP 41 9 22% 4 10% 13 32%

16SM 24 2 8% 1 4% 3 13%

16AU 87 23 26% 7 8% 30 34%

17SP 39 5 13% 1 3% 6 15%

17SM 15 1 7% 2 13% 3 20%

17AU 73 14 19% 5 7% 19 26%

18SP 47 9 19% 4 9% 13 28%

18SM 18 4 22% 3 17% 7 39%

18AU 92 25 27% 8 9% 33 36%

19SP 44 2 5% 0 0% 2 5%

1,315 444 34% 151 11% 595 45%

164 76 46% 24 15% 100 61%

167 71 43% 22 13% 93 56%

154 55 36% 26 17% 81 53%

138 69 50% 15 11% 84 61%

113 41 36% 17 15% 58 51%

140 47 34% 16 11% 63 45%

150 30 20% 9 6% 39 26%

135 24 18% 11 8% 35 26%

Records as of 112/13/2018 5

*as of reporting, registrations still open for 19SP

TOTAL MATRICULATIONSAll-Time Matriculation

Rate

Source: HUM Matruclation Source Report_Apps_Reg (Program Review)

Aggregate Data: By Academic Year

2014-15

2013-14

2012-13

2011-12

2010-11

Academic YearNumber Applying

1Number Matriculating

2 Apply + Register Same

Term Matric. RateAdditional Matriculations

3

3Applied but Enrolled after Application Term (in future) in HUM program

2Applied and Enrolled Same Term (First Term) as Human Services Technology Students, Degree and Non-Degree, Non-Certificate IDs

1'Moved to Student' in Human Services Technology, Degree and Non-Degree, Non-Certificate IDs

Number Matriculating2Number Applying1Application Term

2015-16

2014-15

2013-14

2012-13

Overall Totals/Rates

Additional Matriculations

RateAdditional Matriculations3Apply + Register Same

Term Matric. Rate

2015-16

2017-18

2016-17

Additional Matriculations

Rate

2018-19*

APPLICATION AND MATRICULATION

DISAGGREGATED BY ACADEMIC TERM

AGGREGATED BY ACADEMIC YEAR

2011-12

2010-11

Academic YearAll-Time Matriculation

RateTOTAL MATRICULATIONS

2016-17

2017-18


December 2018


[email protected]



6

53%

67%

58%61%

53%56% 58%

55%58%

52% 53%

76%

50%

63%

55%59%

44%48%

51%

32%

13%

34%

15%20%

26% 28%

39%36%

44%

55%

36%

42%

25%

50%

38%

47%

42%

32%

41%

71%

40%

45%

36%

49%

28%

36%39%

22%26%

13%

19% 19%22%

27%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

SM10 AU10 WI11 SP11 SM11 AU11 WI12 SP12 SM12 12AU 13SP 13SM 13AU 14SP 14SM 14AU 15SP 15SM 15AU 16SP 16SM 16AU 17SP 17SM 17AU 18SP 18SM 18AU

Application Term

Human Services Technology Applicant Matriculation Rate TrendSM10-18AU Comparing Application and First-Registered TermsActive in Human Services Technology (.AAS & .NDNC)

All-Time Matriculation Rate

Apply + Register Same Term Matric. Rate

61%

56%53%

61%

51%

45%

26% 26%

46%43%

36%

50%

36%34%

20%18%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Application Year

Human Services Technology Applicant Matriculation Rate TrendAY2010-11 - AY2017-18 Comparing Application and First Registered TermsActive in Human Services Technology (.AAS & .NDNC)

All-Time Matriculation Rate

Apply + Register Same Term Matric. Rate


December 2018


[email protected]



Autumn Term Unduplicated Headcount

AU07 160

AU08 206

AU09 242

AU10 265

AU11 246

12AU 229

13AU 213

14AU 168

15AU 163

16AU 115

17AU 82

18AU 97

Spring Term Unduplicated Headcount

SP07 152

SP08 177

SP09 200

SP10 249

SP11 249 3

SP12 245

13SP 248

14SP 207

15SP 157

16SP 150

17SP 113

18SP 81

7

ENROLLMENT

Source: Census Reports, Enrollment by Department

AUTUMN-TERM ENROLLMENT*

SPRING-TERM ENROLLMENT*

Source: Census Reports, Enrollment by Department

*Quarter/Semester Census, Degree- and Non-Degree, Non-Certificate Seeking Students

*Quarter/Semester Census, Degree- and Non-Degree, Non-Certificate Seeking Student

160206

242

265

246 229213

168 163

11582

97

0

100

200

300

400

AU07 AU08 AU09 AU10 AU11 12AU 13AU 14AU 15AU 16AU 17AU 18AU

Quarter/Semester

Autumn Quarter/Semester HeadcountUnduplicated for Human Services Technology Programs

152

177200

249 249 245 248207

157 150

11381

0

100

200

300

400

SP07 SP08 SP09 SP10 SP11 SP12 13SP 14SP 15SP 16SP 17SP 18SP

Quarter/Semester

Spring Quarter/Semester HeadcountUnduplicated for Human Services Technology Programs


December 2018


[email protected]



Academic Year HSV-285* HSV-286* Total

2007-08 43 71 114

2008-09 32 61 93

2009-10 37 67 104

2010-11 50 88 138

2011-12 57 111 168

2012-13 47 44 91

2013-14 43 44 87

2014-15 41 33 74

2015-16 44 43 87

2016-17 21 25 46

2017-18 16 16 32

8Source: COTC Course Outcomes Dashboard (RA)

**In AY2012-13, the Human Services Technology plan of study changed from 3 required practicum courses to 2 required practicum courses

*Includes equivalent, previously used quarter/semester course names with enrollment aggregated across the academic year

PRACTICUM PLACEMENT BY ACADEMIC YEAR, TOTAL CENSUS-DAY ENROLLMENTS

114

93104

138

168

91 87

74

87

46

32

4332 37

5057

47 43

41

44

21 16

7161

67

88

111

44 44

33

43

25 16

0

100

200

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Academic Year

Enrollment in Practicum Courses**Total Enrollments by Academic Year

Total HSV-285* HSV-286*


December 2018


[email protected]



2009-10 1,091 969 27 97.5% 88.8% 91.1%

2010-11 1,393 1,224 61 95.6% 87.9% 91.9%

2011-12 1,302 1,151 40 96.9% 88.4% 91.2%

2012-13 980 800 32 96.7% 81.6% 84.4%

2013-14 909 734 42 95.4% 80.7% 84.7%

2014-15 762 611 36 95.3% 80.2% 84.2%

2015-16 652 537 27 95.9% 82.4% 85.9%

2016-17 473 369 33 93.0% 78.0% 83.9%

2017-18 384 321 15 96.1% 83.6% 87.0%

2009-10 1,027 907 26 97.5% 88.3% 90.6%

2010-11 1,041 922 46 95.6% 88.6% 92.7%

2011-12 822 747 22 97.3% 90.9% 93.4%

2012-13 513 440 11 97.9% 85.8% 87.6%

2013-14 521 444 19 96.4% 85.2% 88.4%

2014-15 436 378 14 96.8% 86.7% 89.6%

2015-16 378 328 13 96.6% 86.8% 89.9%

2016-17 226 189 9 96.0% 83.6% 87.1%

2017-18 176 161 5 97.2% 91.5% 94.2%

2009-10 64 62 1 98.4% 96.9% 98.4%

2010-11 352 302 15 95.7% 85.8% 89.6%

2011-12 480 404 18 96.3% 84.2% 87.4%

2012-13 467 360 21 95.5% 77.1% 80.7%

2013-14 388 290 23 94.1% 74.7% 79.5%

2014-15 326 233 22 93.3% 71.5% 76.6%

2015-16 274 209 14 94.9% 76.3% 80.4%

2016-17 247 180 24 90.3% 72.9% 80.7%

2017-18 208 160 10 95.2% 76.9% 80.8%

2009-10 776 668 23 97.0% 86.1% 88.7%

2010-11 884 749 48 94.6% 84.7% 89.6%

2011-12 786 677 27 96.6% 86.1% 89.2%

2012-13 666 542 27 95.9% 81.4% 84.8%

2013-14 608 472 30 95.1% 77.6% 81.7%

2014-15 543 420 33 93.9% 77.3% 82.4%

2015-16 415 325 21 94.9% 78.3% 82.5%

2016-17 329 244 30 90.9% 74.2% 81.6%

2017-18 267 213 15 94.4% 79.8% 84.5%

2009-10 315 301 4 98.7% 95.6% 96.8%

2010-11 509 475 13 97.4% 93.3% 95.8%

2011-12 516 474 13 97.5% 91.9% 94.2%

2012-13 314 258 5 98.4% 82.2% 83.5%

2013-14 301 262 12 96.0% 87.0% 90.7%

2014-15 219 191 3 98.6% 87.2% 88.4%

2015-16 237 212 6 97.5% 89.5% 91.8%

2016-17 144 125 3 97.9% 86.8% 88.7%

2017-18 117 108 0 100.0% 92.3% 92.3%

9

3Enrollment as of quarter/semester census day

2Courses coded as WebCredit

1Courses coded as Newark, Cohocton, Knox, and/or Pataskala

OVERALL

HUMAN

SERVICES

TECHNOLOGY

200-level

Courses9

100-level

Courses9

ONLINE

COURSES2

FACE-TO-FACE

COURSES1

9Courses coded 100- or 200-Level based on course names and position on plan of study

7"Enrollee Success Rate" - Grade of "C or better" ÷ Total Census Enrollment

6Course Retention Rate = (Total Enrollment - Withdraws) ÷ Total Enrollments

5Formal course withdraws

4Grades of "C or Better"

8"Completer Success Rate" = (Grade of "C or better" ÷ (Total Census Enrollments - Withdraws) ) aka Grade of "C or better" ÷ End of Term Enrollment

COURSE RETENTION AND COMPLETION

Course Completion RatesEnrollment

Frequencies3Academic YearAggregation

LevelCompleter

Success8Enrollee Success7

Course Retention

Rates6Withdraws5Successful

Completions4

Outcomes Frequencies


December 2018


[email protected]



10

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Academic Year

Enrollee Success Rates (7)Overall vs. Face to Face vs. OnlineData Labels Report OVERALL Figures

OVERALL HUMAN SERVICES TECHNOLOGYFACE-TO-FACE COURSES1ONLINE COURSES2

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Academic Year

Completer Success Rates (8)Overall vs. Face to Face vs. OnlineData Labels Report OVERALL Figures


50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Academic Year

Course Retention Rates (6)Overall vs. Face to Face vs. OnlineData Labels Report OVERALL Figures



December 2018


[email protected]



11

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Academic Year

Retention Rates by Course Level (6, 9)100- vs. 200-Level Courses

100-level Courses9200-level Courses9

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Academic Year

Enrollee Success Rates by Course Level (7, 9)100- vs. 200-Level Courses


50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Academic Year

Completer Success Rates by Course Level (8, 9)100- vs. 200-Level Courses



December 2018


[email protected]



Term IDs Number Starting1Number Retained Retention Rate COHORT TERM Number Graduating2 Graduation Rate2

AU10 → WI11 50 35 70.0% AU10 7 14.0%

AU11 → WI12 49 35 71.4% AU11 5 10.2%

12AU → 13SP 46 36 78.3% 12AU 6 13.0%

13AU → 14SP 34 22 64.7% 13AU 7 20.6%

14AU → 15SP 28 16 57.1% 14AU 4 14.3%

15AU → 16SP 46 24 52.2% 15AU 1 2.2%

16AU → 17SP 29 20 69.0% 16AU 3 10.3%

17AU → 18SP 17 9 52.9% 17AU 0 0.0%

Overall Rates*** 299 197 65.9% 30 11.9%

Rev. Grad #3: 253

12

PROGRAM RETENTION AND GRADUATION

AUTUMN TO NEXT TERM RETENTION / COHORT GRADUATION

Source: HUM Autumn to Spring Retention Rates

3Through 15AU cohort for Overall Grad Rate; Use Rev. Grad # as denominator

2"All-time" rate; Excludes 'other' degrees outside of HUM

1Degree and Non-Degree/Non-Certificate IDs

50 49 46

3428

46

29

17

70.0% 71.4% 78.3%

64.7%

57.1%

52.2%

69.0%

52.9%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

0

15

30

45

60

AU10 → WI11 AU11 → WI12 12AU → 13SP 13AU → 14SP 14AU → 15SP 15AU → 16SP 16AU → 17SP 17AU → 18SP

Cohort Start Term / Next Term Retained

Cohort Headcount and Autumn to Next Term Retention by Cohort Start Term

Number Starting1 Retention Rate

14.0%

10.2%

13.0%20.6%

14.3%

2.2%10.3%

0.0%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

AU10 AU11 12AU 13AU 14AU 15AU 16AU 17AU

Cohort Start Term

All-Time Graduation Rate (2)Active Human Services Technology by Cohort Start Term


December 2018


[email protected]



Academic YearNumber of

Graduates

Median Time-to-

Degree

2005-06 22 3.04

2006-07 31 3.17

2007-08 31 2.67

2008-09 26 4.29

2009-10 27 3.17

2010-11 33 2.92

2011-12 42 3.42

2012-13 35 3.08

2013-14 29 3.67

2014-15 22 3.71

2015-16 42 3.63

2016-17 22 4.38

2017-18 18 4.00

Median 29 3.42

Median 05-12 3.17

Median 12-17 3.69

Average 05-12 3.24

Average 12-17 3.75

13Source: COTC Graduates by Academic Year; Human Services_Graduate_Time to Degree Source

GRADUATES

Comparison of Means

Comparison of 50th Percentiles

22

31 31

26 27

33

42

35

29

22

42

22

18

3.04 3.172.67

4.29

3.17 2.923.42

3.083.67 3.71 3.63

4.384.00

0

5

10

0

25

50

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Time-to

-Degree (Years)C

ou

nt

of

Gra

du

ates

Academic Year

Human Services TechnologyGraduates by Academic Year and Median Time-to-Degree

Number of GraduatesMedian Time-to-Degree


December 2018


[email protected]



Graduation Year Graduate Count Cumulative Institutional GPA1 HUM Course GPA2GPA GAP

AY2005-06 22 3.25 3.34 0.09

AY2006-07 31 3.25 3.37 0.12

AY2007-08 31 3.30 3.51 0.21

AY2008-09 26 3.26 3.52 0.26

AY2009-10 27 3.32 3.54 0.22

AY2010-11 33 3.23 3.44 0.21

AY2011-12 42 3.33 3.63 0.30

AY2012-13 35 3.34 3.60 0.26

AY2013-14 29 3.36 3.61 0.25

AY2014-15 22 3.36 3.67 0.31

AY2015-16 42 3.33 3.56 0.23

AY2016-17 22 3.16 3.48 0.32

AY2017-18 18 3.17 3.37 0.20

Totals: 380 3.28 3.51 0.23

14

1Cumulative Institutional GPA is Graduate GPA as of Graduation Term

2Average Grade Point obtained by HUM Graduates in HUM courses for Graduates enrolled with status of Add, New, Prereq Override-Add, or Prereq Override-New; HUM,

HSV, HUMSVS courses: HSV Grads_Overall and Course GPA Source

GRADUATE'S GRADE POINT AVERAGE, CUMULATIVE AND SUBJECT-SPECIFIC

0.09 0.12 0.21 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.31 0.23 0.320.20

3.25 3.25 3.30 3.26 3.32 3.23 3.33 3.34 3.36 3.36 3.333.16 3.17

3.34 3.373.51 3.52 3.54 3.44

3.63 3.60 3.61 3.673.56 3.48

3.37

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

AY2005-06 AY2006-07 AY2007-08 AY2008-09 AY2009-10 AY2010-11 AY2011-12 AY2012-13 AY2013-14 AY2014-15 AY2015-16 AY2016-17 AY2017-18

Human Services Graduate's GPA TrendsCumulative Institutional GPA, HUM Course GPA

GPA GAPCumulative Institutional GPA1HUM Course GPA2


December 2018


[email protected]



HSV-100 HSV-110 HSV-120 HSV-130 HSV-141 HSV-150 HSV-200 HSV-285 HSV-286

15

To accomplish the stated purpose of the Human Services Technology program, the following student learning outcomes have been developed. Upon successful completion of the program, graduates will

be able to perform the following activities. This table lists the stated programmatic learning outcomes along with the course in which the outcome is evaluated.

AY2017-2018 HUM Learning Outcomes Table

Course Completer Success Rates1

Principles of

Social Work

Chemical

Dependency I

Direct Practice

Skills

Case

Management

Therapeutic

Group

Social Welfare

and PolicyFamily Systems Practicum I Practicum II

Results are Reported for Human Services Technology Students Active in Program at time of Course Completion

- -

-

78.87%

- -

-

- 90.91%

84.85%

100.00%

84.09%

- - -

-- - 100.00%

-

1Completer Success Rate = (Grade of "C or Better" ÷ (Total Census Enrollments - Withdraws)) for only declared human services technology students (degree- and non-degree, non-certificate-seeking) at time of completion.

-

LEARNING OUTCOMES

- -

LO-6: Demonstrate the ability to adhere to

professional, ethical standards, including

confidentiality, sensitivity when working with

diverse populations and responsibility for

professional growth.

- - - - -

- -

LO-4: Apply interpersonal skills in helping

relationships, including crisis intervention

and group dynamics.

- -

-

Lear

nin

g O

utc

om

e

Source: Human Services Technology Course Enrollment Source Report

100.00%100.00%

78.57%

-

-

-

LO-5: Apply case management skills,

including documentation, assessment,

treatment planning, crisis intervention, and

the ability to make appropriate referrals.

LO-1: Demonstrate an understanding of the

role of the human services worker in a

variety of social settings.

LO-2: Examine current social issues and their

impact on society, including substance abuse

and dependence.

- - - -

LO-3: Compare and contrast a variety of

family systems and multi-dimensional

systems in relation to human behaviors and

the environment.

-


December 2018


[email protected]



Count Percent

101 31.3%

34 13.9%

31 12.9%

26 11.5%

9 4.0%

8 2.3%

7 2.5%

6 2.3%

6 2.2%

3 1.0%

3 1.0%

3 1.0%

3 1.1%

3 1.0%

2 0.7%

2 0.8%

2 0.8%

1 0.2%

1 0.4%

1 0.2%

1 0.5%

1 0.3%

1 0.4%

1 0.4%

1 0.3%

1 0.3%

1 0.2%

1 0.4%

1 0.2%

1 0.2%

1 0.5%

1 0.2%

1 0.5%

1 0.2%

1 0.4%

1 0.6%

1 0.4%

1 0.5%

1 0.5%

1 0.3%

1 0.4%

1 0.4%

1 0.2%

1 0.6%

276 100.0%

Degree Title Degree Count Percent Institution Degree Count Percent

50 46% 64 59%

16 15% 18 17%

13 12% 5 5%

7 6% 5 5%

6 6% 4 4%

6 6% 2 2%

2 2% 2 2%

1 1% 1 1%

1 1% 1 1%

1 1% 1 1%

1 1% 1 1%

1 1% 1 1%

1 1% 1 1%

1 1% 1 1%

1 1% 1 1%

108 108

16

Degrees: Of the 265 COTC graduates, 108 additional degrees were earned (at any level) (41%), originating from 14 institutions in addition to COTC. Here's the degree count by title and by institution.

1Limitations of the National Student Clearinghouse - Student Tracker query system include the possibility of records being suppressed by

student/graduate and/or colleges may not participate in the file submission to allow students to be located.

INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY - APS U/G

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY

MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIV- GRAD AND PROF STUDIES

OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

PURDUE UNIVERSITY GLOBAL

CERTIFICATE

MASTER OF ARTS

MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMIN.

MASTER OF SCIENCE

MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY

WALDEN UNIVERSITY

ASHFORD UNIVERSITY

FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY

INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY

MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE

OHIO UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX

SUBSEQUENT EDUCATION OF GRADUATES

The following data were gathered via a National Student Clearinghouse - Student Tracker1 subsequent enrollment request to learn if recent Human Services Technology graduates continued to

complete additional degrees following their time at COTC.

Population: Human Services Technology Graduates, SP10 to 18SP (N = 265 Grads submitted)

Of the 265 graduates, 154 (58%) were found with at least 1 enrollment record following their HUM degree, either returning to COTC or at another institution. These graduates returned with 276

duplicated records, indicating they attended 1.04 institutions on average. The following list shows the institutions attended.

INSTITUTION

MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIV- GRAD AND PROF STUDIES

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - NEWARK

OHIO UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX

MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIV- COLUMBUS- NEW ALBANY

MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING

AAACCT

BACHELOR OF TECHNICAL AND APPLIED STUDIES

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHARLOTTE

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY

Grand Total

STRAYER UNIVERSITY-WASHINGTON

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - LIMA

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - MANSFIELD

TRINITY LUTHERAN SEMINARY

TROY UNIVERSITY

MERCY COLLEGE OF OHIO

BSB/ACA

BSHS/M

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN SOCIAL WORK

MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK

ASSOCIATE IN ARTS or SCIENCE

BACHELOR OF ARTS or SCIENCE

MIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY

MUSKINGUM UNIV GRADS

PURDUE UNIVERSITY GLOBAL

SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE- 09WEEK

EASTERN GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY

INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

CAPITAL UNIVERSITY- TRINITY LUTHERAN SEMINARY

CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY

CENTRAL PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE

CHAMBERLAIN UNIVERSITY

COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

NOT REPORTED

CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE

INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY - APS U/G

ASHFORD UNIVERSITY

CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

BACHELOR OF SOCIAL WORK

FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY

OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY

WALDEN UNIVERSITY

ZANE STATE COLLEGE

BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY

BRESCIA UNIVERSITY

CAMPBELLSVILLE UNIVERSITY

CAPITAL UNIVERSITY COLUMBUS


December 2018


[email protected]



2008-09 17% 67% 0% 17% 0%

2009-10 67% 11% 11% 0% 11%

2010-11 27% 18% 27% 27% 0%

2011-12 27% 40% 13% 13% 7%

2012-13 53% 10% 22% 11% 4%

2013-14 57% 16% 12% 12% 4%

2014-15 50% 20% 10% 0% 20%

2015-16 41% 33% 8% 17% 0%

2016-17 50% 17% 8% 17% 8%

2017-18 67% 0% 33% 0% 0%

2008-09 67%

2009-10 11%

2010-11 38%

2011-12 75%

2012-13 77%

2013-14 78%

2014-15 50%

2015-16 50%

2016-17 50%

2017-18 33%

17

Is your current employment related to your field of study1?

Grad Year

GRADUATE SATISFACTION - COTC Office of Student Life Graduate Follow-up Survey Results

Please indicate which of the following statements best describes your current employment status1:

Not Employed and Not

Searching

Not Employeed but

Searching

Employed Part-Time,

Unable to Find Full-Time

Work

Employed Part Time by

ChoiceEmployed Full-TimeGrad Year

The Human Services Technology program administers a graduate follow-up survey to recent graduates following each commencement. The program

also collects graduate information from a graduate survey administered by the COTC Office of Career Development. Data are collected and analyzed

for the purposes of evaluating graduate satisfaction and supporting continuous quality improvement of the academic program.

Yes

17%

67%

27%

27%

53%57%

50%

41%

50%

67%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Rate of Graduates Reporting Full-Time Employment or Part-Time Employment (by Choice)

Employed Full-Time

67%

11%

38%

75% 77% 78%

50% 50% 50%

33%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Rate of Graduates Reporting Employment Related to Field of Study


December 2018


[email protected]



2008-09 67% 17% 0%

2009-10 22% 56% 11%

2010-11 10% 40% 40%

2011-12 27% 60% 7%

2012-13 31% 41% 18%

2013-14 34% 44% 17%

2014-15 40% 30% 0%

2015-16 58% 17% 8%

2016-17 64% 27% 0%

2017-18 67% 0% 0%

2009-10 11%

2010-11 73%

2011-12 80%

2012-13 60%

2013-14 68%

2014-15 70%

2015-16 67%

2016-17 58%

2017-18 67%

18

Source: Student Life, Office of Career Development and Experiential Learning, and Human Services Technology Program

Director Tressa Arnold - Please contact each Office for methodological notes

1Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding and/or not applicable response category

89%

Do you plan to enroll in an additional training or degree program within the next six months1?

Grad Year Yes

70%

83%

91%

95%

90%

94%

90%

67%

84%

At Least Somewhat

The courses in your technology gave you the skills to be successful in the major areas with your job1?

Grad Year Very Well Well Somewhat

84%89% 90%

94%90%

95%

70%

83%

91%

67%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Rate of Graduates Reporting 'At Least Somewhat' to"The technical coursework prepared you to be successful in the major areas with your job"

11%

73%80%

60%

68% 70%67%

58%

67%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Rate of Graduates Responding 'Yes' to"Do you plan to enroll in an additional training or degree program within the

next six months?"


December 2018


[email protected]



2012-13 22% 64% 14% 78% 100%

2013-14 6% 88% 6% 94% 94%

2014-15 0% 50% 50% 100% 100%

2015-16 25% 50% 25% 75% 100%

2016-17 50% 38% 12% 50% 100%

2017-18* 33% 67% 0% 67% 100%

* n = 9

2012-13 57% 36% 7% 0% 93%

2013-14 50% 38% 0% 12% 88%

2014-15 0% 50% 0% 50% 50%

2015-16 45% 55% 0% 0% 100%

2016-17 50% 50% 0% 0% 100%

2017-18* 0% 78% 0% 22% 78%

* n = 9

19

Do you plan to continue your education?

Grad Year Pursuing Now

GRADUATE SATISFACTION - Human Services Technology Graduate Follow-up Survey Results

Are you currently employed? Do you plan to use your AAS degree?

Grad Year Employed Not Employed Not Seeking Employment

Combined Not

Employed/Not Seeking

Employment

Plan to Use AAS Degree?

AT COMMENCEMENT

The following information was collected by the Human Services Technology Program to assess Graduate Outcomes as part of the Program's Graduate

Follow-up Survey. Measurement are taken twice - At Commencement and six months after commencement.

Undecided No Plans to PursuePursuing in FutureTotal Pursuing

Now/Pursuing in Future

100%94%

100% 100% 100% 100%

78%

94%100%

75%

50%

67%

22%

6%0%

25%

50%

33%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*


Plan to Use AAS Degree? Combined Not Employed/Not Seeking Employment Employed

93%88%

50%

100% 100%

78%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*

Do you plan to continue your education?Total Pursuing Now/Pursuing in Future


December 2018


[email protected]



2012-13 79% 43%

2013-14 88% 44%

2014-15 100% 100%

2015-16 75% 35%

2016-17 88% 50%

2017-18* 44% 56%

* n = 9

2012-13 0% 100%

2013-14 6% 94%

2014-15 0% 100%

2015-16 21% 79%

2016-17 14% 86%

2017-18* 0% 100%

* n = 9

2012-13 100% 0%

2013-14 100% 0%

2014-15 100% 0%

2015-16 100% 0%

2016-17 100% 0%

2017-18* 100% 0%

* n = 9

20

Are you seeking a SWA? Are you seeking a CDCA?

CDCA

Would you recommend this program to other potential students?

Grad Year SWA

Grad Year Yes No

No

Did you experience any barriers to completion?

Grad Year Yes

79%88%

100%

75%88%

44%43% 44%35%

50%

56%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*

Are you Seeking a SWA? CDCA?

SWA CDCA

0% 6% 0%

21%14%

0%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*

Did you experience any Barriers to Completion?Yes

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*


Yes


December 2018


[email protected]



2012-13 71% 29% 0% 100%

2013-14 88% 6% 0% 94%

2014-15 50% 50% 0% 100%

2015-16 60% 40% 0% 100%

2016-17 75% 25% 0% 100%

2017-18* 50% 50% 0% 100%

* n = 8

2012-13 36% 50% 7% 93%

2013-14 25% 50% 13% 88%

2014-15 50% 0% 50% 100%

2015-16 35% 30% 25% 90%

2016-17 43% 43% 14% 100%

2017-18* 38% 63% 0% 100%

* n = 8

21

How well did the Human Services Program prepare you for the field?

Grad Year Very Well Well Somewhat At Least Somewhat

How well did the General Education Courses prepare you for the field?


100% 94% 100% 100% 100% 100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*


At Least Somewhat

93% 88%100%

90%100% 100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*


At Least Somewhat


December 2018


[email protected]



2013-14 43% 43% 14% 57% 100%

2014-15 0% 50% 50% 100% 100%

2015-16 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%

2016-17 33% 33% 33% 67% 100%

2017-18

2013-14 43% 43% 0% 14% 86%

2014-15 0% 50% 0% 50% 50%

2015-16 100% 0% 0% 0% 100%

2016-17 0% 0% 0% 67% 0%

2017-18

22

SIX MONTHS AFTER COMMENCEMENT


Grad Year Employed Not Employed Not Seeking Employment

Combined Not

Employed/Not Seeking

Employment

Plan to Use AAS Degree?

Do you plan to continue your education?

Grad Year Pursuing Now Pursuing in Future Undecided No Plans to PursueTotal Pursuing

Now/Pursuing in Future

100% 100% 100% 100%

57%

100% 100%

67%

43%

0% 0%

33%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18


Plan to Use AAS Degree? Combined Not Employed/Not Seeking Employment Employed

86%

50%

100%

0%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Do you plan to continue your education?Total Pursuing Now/Pursuing in Future


December 2018


[email protected]



2013-14 71% 29%

2014-15 100% 100%

2015-16 0% 0%

2016-17 0% 0%

2017-18

2013-14 14% 86%

2014-15 0% 100%

2015-16 0% 100%

2016-17 0% 100%

2017-18

2013-14 100% 0%

2014-15 100% 0%

2015-16 100% 0%

2016-17 100% 0%

2017-18

2013-14 43% 43% 0% 86%

2014-15 50% 50% 0% 100%

2015-16 100% 0% 0% 100%

2016-17 33% 33% 33% 100%

2017-18

23

Grad Year Yes No

Are you seeking a SWA? Are you seeking a CDCA?

Grad Year SWA CDCA

Did you experience any barriers to completion?



Grad Year Yes No


71%

100%

0%29% 0%

0%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Are you Seeking a SWA? CDCA?

SWA CDCA

14%0% 0% 0%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Did you experience any Barriers to Completion?Yes

100% 100% 100% 100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18


Yes

86%100% 100% 100%

0%25%50%75%

100%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18


At Least Somewhat


December 2018


[email protected]



2013-14 29% 43% 14% 86%

2014-15 50% 0% 50% 100%

2015-16 0% 0% 100% 100%

2016-17 33% 33% 33% 100%

2017-18

24Source: Human Services Technology Program Director Tressa Arnold - Please contact for methodological notes




86%100% 100% 100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18


At Least Somewhat


December 2018


[email protected]



2011 90%

2014 96%

2017* 100%

2018 100%

2011 92%

2014 98%

2017* 100%

2018 100%

25

*Rating from Employer-Respondents for Human Services

Graduates

EMPLOYER SATISFACTION - COTC Office of Student Life Employer Survey Results

Please indicate your satisfaction with the education of graduates you've hired1:

Please indicate if you would recommend COTC graduates1:

Survey YearWould Recommend

COTC Graduate

Survey YearVery Satisfied or

Satisfied

COTC Started asking program-specific questions in 2017;

Please rate your COTC graduate-employees' ability on

program specific learning outcome

Central Ohio Technical College administers an employer survey every year (starting in 2017, every 3 years prior) to gauge workforce needs from

employers who may hire or have hired COTC graduates. COTC administers an employer survey through the Office of Career Development. Data are

collected and analyzed for the purposes of evaluating employer satisfaction with graduates, determining curricular needs to meet workforce demands,

and supporting continuous quality improvement of the academic program.

90% 96%100% 100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2011 2014 2017* 2018

Rate of Employers Responding'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' - 'Somewhat Able' or ' Very Able'

92%98% 100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2011 2014 2017*

Rate of Employers Responding'Would Recommend COTC Graduate'


December 2018


[email protected]



2012-13 2015-16 2018-19 2021-2022 2024-25

26

60%

66%

50%

Response Item

100%

EMPLOYER SATISFACTION - COTC Human Services Technology Employer Survey Results

Would Refer to HSV

Program

Would Hire Graduate

Again100%

100% 75%

100%

Response Rates for the HSV Employer Survey

Survey Year

Aware of SWA and

CDCA Scope

Would Have Hired if

Position was Avail.

Have Employed a HSV

Graduate

Had a Practicum

Student89%

56%

57%

38%

89%

56% 57%

38%

100% 100%100%

50%

66%60%

100%

75%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Had a PracticumStudent

Have Employed a HSVGraduate

Would Have Hired ifPosition was Avail.

Aware of SWA andCDCA Scope

Would Hire GraduateAgain

Would Refer to HSVProgram

Response Rates for the HUM Employer Survey

2012-13 2015-16


December 2018


[email protected]



General Skills (5

respondents for 12

grads)

Very Unable Somewhat Unable Somewhat Able Very Able NA

Read, write, speak,

listen, and analyze

written and spoken

communication

2 4

Make informed decisions

using mathematical data

and logical thinking

2 3

Use logical inquiry and

problem solving

strategies

2 3

Test and evaluate

hypotheses3 1 1

Aware of social and

cultural differences5

Technical Skills (4

respondents for 12

grads)


Demonstrate an

understanding of the

role of the human

services worker in a

variety of social services

settings

1 3

Examine current social

issues and their impact

on society, including

substance abuse and

dependence

1 3

- These individuals were prepared, willing to learn, and desired growth

On a scale from 1-5 with 1 being ‘Very Unable’ and 4 being ‘Very Able’

5= Not applicable

Responses associated with Satisfaction:

- Currently I have just one staff person who is a graduate of COTC and went on to get her bachelor's from MVNU. She is easily distracted by family

issues and gets pulled into staff and/or client drama. She has a hard time maintaining boundaries

- We've had very positive experiences with the internship program leading to new hires. They have been well prepared, motivated and positive

additions to our staff

- These employee was trained by me who is a graduate from COTC

- Students who are in or have graduated from the Human Services field are very knowledgeable and have a great skill set

Graduate Skill

Assessment

Overall Satisfaction

Mean = 4.40

In summer 2017, COTC revised and administered a new Employer Satisfaction Survey which expanded on previous survey administrations to include

questions about employer's priorities over the next 1-2 years, as well as to collect feedback from these respondents on graduate's General Education

and Technology Education learning outcomes. Those responses for Human Services Technology are below.

HUMAN SERVICES HUM.AAS

Represented Industries: Social Services, Healthcare, Public Administration (Local, State, Federal), Transportation & Warehousing-(social services)

Number of Employers Responding: 5

Responses base on approximant number of graduates: 12

Overall Satisfaction Scale for employers who have hired & supervise graduate(s)

1 = Highly Unsatisfied to 5 = Highly Satisfied


December 2018


[email protected]



Technical Skills (4

respondents for 12

grads)


Compare and contrast a

variety of family and

multidimensional

systems in relation to

human behaviors and

the environment

1 3

Apply interpersonal and

group leadership skills in

helping relationships

1 3

Apply case management

skills, including

documentation,

assessment, treatment

planning, crisis

intervention and the

ability to make

appropriate referrals

1 3

Demonstrate the ability

to adhere to

professional, ethical

standards, including

confidentiality,

sensitivity when working

with diverse populations

and responsibility for

professional growth

1 3

Yes = 4 (100%) No = 0

28

Responses for 2018 found 100% reporting "very able" to the technical human services program learning outcomes. Comments from the respondent(s)

included:

- Thank you for preparing your students with educational and real world experiences.

- We also are very pleased with providing internships and will continue to accept qualified candidates for those positions at the agency.

Additional Questions


Would you recommend COTC graduates to a peer? (4 respondents)

Source: Student Life, Office of Career Development and Experiential Learning, and Human Services Technology Program Director

Tressa Arnold - Please contact each Office for methodological notes


December 2018


[email protected]

Documents

Central Ohio Technical College Services... · 2019-04-08 · Central Ohio Technical College Human Services Technology, Student Achievement Indicators Report SM10 32 14 44% 3 9% 17