Upload
cezardoca
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
QUASISTATIC BENDING OF BEAMS – SOME GENERALIZED ANALYTICAL MODELS APPLICABLE TO NPP’S MECHANICAL STRUCTURESCEZAR DOCA, Ph.D.ABSTRACTAddressing the problem of the quasistatic bending of homogenous straight beams (bars), the paper presents, from simple to complex, the analytical models for a total of 24 (= 2 × 3 × 2 × 2 ) general situations, individualized by the combination of: (a) the absence / presence of an elastic base (bed, support), i.e. 2 cases; (b) the absence / presence of a compress
Citation preview
QUASISTATIC BENDING OF BEAMS – SOME GENERALIZED
ANALYTICAL MODELS APPLICABLE TO NPP’S MECHANICAL
STRUCTURES
CEZAR DOCA, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT
Addressing the problem of the quasistatic bending of homogenous straight beams
(bars), the paper presents, from simple to complex, the analytical models for a total of
24 ( )2232 ×××= general situations, individualized by the combination of: (a) the
absence / presence of an elastic base (bed, support), i.e. 2 cases; (b) the absence /
presence of a compressive / tensile axial force, i.e. 3 cases; (c) beam with constant /
variable moment of inertia, i.e. 2 cases, and (d) beam with constant / variable distributed
load, i.e. 2 cases. The generality of these (mathematically both beautiful and powerful)
models enables their application in the study of the quasistatic bending of any
mechanical structure equivalent to a homogeneous straight beam (bar), examples for a
NPP being: fuel elements, pressure tubes, pipes, structural beams etc.
INTRODUCTION
It is known that, in the classical theory concerning the quasistatic bending of beams, we have
the (adapted / simplified) differential equation of second order:
(1) ( ) ( )
( )0
2
2
=+xEI
xM
dx
xwd
where: x is the axial coordinate; ( )xw is the beam’s deflection; ( )xM is the bending moment
acting on the beam; E is the beam’s elastic modulus, and ( )xI is the beam’s moment of
inertia. The product ( )xEI is the flexural stiffness.
If the bending moment ( )xM is unique determinate by the equilibrium conditions, then the
general solution of equation (1) is provided by the algorithm:
( ) ( )( )∫ ∫ ξ
ξ
ξ
ξ−⋅+=
ξx
ddEI
MxCCxw
1
1
1
2
2
210
1
where 0C and 1C are two integration constants. We only mention here that an “exact”
expression of (1) is:
( )
( )
( )( )
0
1
23
2
2
2
=+
+
xEI
xM
dx
xdw
dx
xwd
If ( )xM is not unique determinate, then we must solve the differential equation of fourth
order:
(2) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
2
2
=−
xq
dx
xwdxEI
dx
d
where ( )xq is the distributed load. Knowing the functions ( )xI and ( )xq , the general solution
of equation (2) is provided by the algorithm:
( )( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )∫ ∫∫∫
ξ
ξ
ξ
ξξξ−ξξξ
+ξ
ξ+
ξ++=
ξ
ξξ
x
ddEI
dqdq
I
C
I
CxCCxw
1
1
1
2
2
1
333
1
332
2
23
2
210
1
22
where, usually, the four integration constants 0C , 1C , 2C and 3C are determinate from the
support conditions at the beam’s ends 0=x and Lx = ; here L is the beam’s length .
BENDING OF BEAMS SUPPORTED ON ELASTIC BASE (BED, SUPPORT)
If the beam is supported on an elastic base (bed, support) characterized by the elastic constant
bk , then the equation (2) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
2
2
=−+
xqxwk
dx
xwdxEI
dx
db
BENDING OF BEAMS WITH AXIAL FORCE
If a compressive or tensile axial force N ( )0>N acts on the beam, then the equation (2)
becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
2
2
2
2
=−±
xq
dx
xwdN
dx
xwdxEI
dx
d
where N± is substituted by N+ for compressive axial force, and by N− for the tensile axial
force.
EQUATIONS, ALGORITHMS AND GENERAL ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS
Now, combining the above last two situations, the equation (2) acquires the general form:
(3) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
2
2
2
2
=−+±
xqxwk
dx
xwdN
dx
xwdxEI
dx
db
and can be particularized, from simple to complex, as below:
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with constant moment of
inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0=bk , 0=N , ( ) 0IxI = and ( ) 0qxq = , the
equation (3) becomes:
( )004
4
0 =− qdx
xwdEI
and has the general solution:
( ) 4
0
03
3
2
21024
xEI
qxCxCxCCxw ++++=
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with constant moment of
inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0=bk , 0=N , ( ) 0IxI = and ( )xqq = , the
equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) 04
4
0 =− xqdx
xwdEI
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( ) ( )∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ξ
ξ
ξ
ξ
ζ++++=
ξ ξ ξx
ddddEI
qxCxCxCCxw
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
0
43
3
2
210
1 2 3
For example, in the particular cases ( ) xqqxq 10 += we have:
( ) 5
0
14
0
03
3
2
21012024
xEI
qx
EI
qxCxCxCCxw +++++=
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with variable moment of
inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0=bk , 0=N , ( )xII = and ( ) 0qxq = , the
equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )02 02
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−⋅+⋅+ qdx
xwd
dx
xIdE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( )( ) ( ) ( )∫ ∫ ξ
ξ
ξ
ξ+
ξ
ξ+
ξ++=
ξx
ddEI
q
I
C
I
CxCCxw
1
1
1
2
2
2
20
2
23
2
210
1
2
For example, in the particular case ( ) xeIxI ⋅α−= 1 we have:
( ) ( ) ( )[ ] xe
EI
EIxCCCqxxxCCxw
α
α
αα++−+α+α−++=
1
4
13230
22
102
2246
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with variable moment of
inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0=bk , 0=N , ( )xII = and ( )xqq = , the
equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 022
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−⋅+⋅+ xqdx
xwd
dx
xIdE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( )( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )∫ ∫∫∫
ξ
ξ
ξ
ξξξ−ξξξ
+ξ
ξ+
ξ++=
ξ
ξξ
x
ddEI
dqdq
I
C
I
CxCCxw
1
1
1
2
2
1
333
1
332
2
23
2
210
1
22
For example, in the particular case ( ) xeIxI ⋅α−= 1 we have:
( ) ( ) ( )∫ ∫ ∫∫
+−++++=
x
dddEI
pd
EI
pCCexCCxw
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
332
1
3
1
3323210
1 22
2 ξξξξξ
ξξξξ
ξξ ξξ
αξ
Forwards, for ( ) xqqxq 10 += the solution becomes:
( ) ( ){ ( )
( )[ ] }1
5
3
132
3
1
2
0
2
31
2
1010110
663
2261824
EI
eEIxCCxqxq
CEIxqxqxqqqxCCxw
x
αα+++
+α++−α++−++=α
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with constant
moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0=bk , 0>N , ( ) 0IxI = and
( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( )002
2
4
4
0 =−+ qdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI
and has the general solution:
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]xsinCxcosCxN
qxCCxw ⋅κ+⋅κ
κ−++= 322
2010
1
2
where 0EI
N=κ .
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with constant
moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0=bk , 0>N , ( ) 0IxI = and
( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
4
4
0 =−+ xqdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) 12
1
3332
1 1 1
3332
232210
2
1 2
ξ
ξ
ξξ⋅κξ
ξ⋅κ⋅κ
+ξξ⋅κξ
ξ⋅κ⋅κ−ξ⋅κ+ξ⋅κ++=
∫
∫ ∫ ∫
ξ
ξ ξ
dddcosqN
sin
dsinqN
cossinCcosCxCCxw
x
where 0EI
N=κ . For example, in the particular case ( ) xqqxq 10 += we have:
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]xsinCxcosCxN
qx
N
qxCCxw ⋅κ+⋅κ
κ−+++= 322
312010
1
62
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with variable
moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0=bk , 0>N , ( )xII = and
( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )02 02
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−+⋅+⋅+ qdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm. However, in the
particular case ( ) xeIxI ⋅α−= 1 , we have:
( )
12
1
32
02
0
1
32
02
0
1
0
1 1
32
022
010
2 322 322
1 2
2
2
2
2222
22
2
ξ
ξ
ξ
α
κ
α
κ−ξ
α
κ
α
κ
α
π
+
α
κ+
α
κ++=
∫∫
∫ ∫
ξ αξαξξ αξαξαξ
ξ αξαξ
αξαξ
dddeYeJdeJeYEI
eq
CeYeCeJexCCxw
x
where 1EI
N=κ . Here ( )zJ 0 and ( )zY0 are the Bessel functions of first and second order; we
know that ( )zJ n and ( )zYn are the solutions of the differential equation
( ) 0222 =−++ ynz'zy''yz .
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with variable
moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0=bk , 0>N , ( )xII = and
( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 022
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−+⋅+⋅+ xqdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm. However, in the
particular case ( ) xeIxI ⋅α−= 1 , we have:
( )
( )
( ) 12
1
32
032
0
1
32
032
0
1
1 1
32
022
010
2 32
2 322
1 2
2
2
2
22
22
22
2
ξ
ξ
ξ
α
κξ
α
κ
−
ξ
α
κξ
α
κ
α
π
+
α
κ+
α
κ++=
∫
∫
∫ ∫
ξ αξαξ
ξ αξαξαξ
ξ αξαξ
αξαξ
dddeYqeJ
deJqeYEI
e
CeYeCeJexCCxw
x
where 1EI
N=κ . Forwards, for ( ) xqqxq 10 += the solution becomes:
( )
( )
( ) 12
1
32
03102
0
1
32
03102
0
1
1 1
32
022
010
2 32
2 322
1 2
2
2
2
22
22
22
2
ξ
ξ
ξ
α
κξ+
α
κ
−
ξ
α
κξ+
α
κ
α
π
+
α
κ+
α
κ++=
∫
∫
∫ ∫
ξ αξαξ
ξ αξαξαξ
ξ αξαξ
αξαξ
dddeYqqeJ
deJqqeYEI
e
CeYeCeJexCCxw
x
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with constant moment
of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0=bk , 0<N , ( ) 0IxI = and ( ) 0qxq = ,
the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( )002
2
4
4
0 =−− qdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI
and has the general solution:
( ) ( )xxeCeCx
N
qxCCxw
⋅κ−⋅κ +κ
+−+= 322
2010
1
2
where 0EI
N=κ .
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with constant moment
of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0=bk , 0<N , ( ) 0IxI = and ( )xqq = , the
equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
4
4
0 =−− xqdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( ) [
( ) ( ) 12
1
33
1
33
1 1
3210
2
32
2
32
1
22
2ξ
ξ
ξξ−ξξ
κ
++++=
∫∫
∫ ∫
ξ
ξ⋅κξ⋅κ−
ξ
ξ⋅κ−ξ⋅κ
ξ
ξ⋅κ−ξ⋅κ
dddeqedeqeN
eCeCxCCxw
x
where 0EI
N=κ . In the particular case ( ) xqqxq 10 += we have:
( ) ( )xxeCeCx
N
qx
N
qxCCxw
⋅κ−⋅κ +κ
+−−+= 322
312010
1
62
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with variable moment
of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0=bk , 0<N , ( )xII = and ( ) 0qxq = ,
the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )02 02
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−⋅+⋅+ qdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm. However, in the
particular case ( ) xeIxI ⋅α−= 1 , we have:
( )
12
1
32
02
0
1
32
02
0
1
0
1 1
203
20210
2 32
2 322
1 2
2
2
2
22
222
22
2
ξ
ξ
ξ
α
κ
α
κ
−ξ
α
κ
α
κ
α
−
α
κ+
α
κ++=
∫
∫
∫ ∫
ξ αξαξ
ξ αξαξαξ
ξ αξαξ
αξαξ
dddeKeI
deIeKEI
eq
eKeCeIeCxCCxw
x
where 1EI
N=κ . Here ( )zI0 and ( )zK0 are the Bessel functions of first order; we know that
( )zI n and ( )zKn are the solutions of the differential equation ( ) 0222 =+−+ ynz'zy"yz .
Beam without elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with variable moment
of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0=bk , 0<N , ( )xII = and ( )xqq = , the
equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 022
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−⋅+⋅+ xqdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm. However, in the
particular case ( ) xeIxI ⋅α−= 1 , we have:
( )
( )
( ) 12
1
3030
1
3030
1
1 1
302010
2
32
2
32
2
1
2222
222
22
22
2
ξ
ξ
ξ
α
κξ
α
κ
−ξ
α
κξ
α
κ
α
+
α
κ+
α
κ++=
∫
∫
∫ ∫
ξ
αξαξ
ξ
αξαξαξ
ξ
αξαξαξαξ
dddeIqeK
deKqeIEI
e
CeKeCeIexCCxw
x
where 1EI
N=κ . Forwards, for ( ) xqqxq 10 += :
( )
( )
( ) 12
1
303100
1
303100
1
1 1
302010
2
32
2
32
2
1
2222
222
22
22
2
ξ
ξ
ξ
α
κξ+
α
κ
−ξ
α
κξ+
α
κ
α
+
α
κ+
α
κ++=
∫
∫
∫ ∫
ξ
αξαξ
ξ
αξαξαξ
ξ
αξαξαξαξ
dddeIqqeK
deKqqeIEI
e
CeKeCeIexCCxw
x
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with constant
moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0>bk , 0=N , ( ) 0IxI = and
( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) 004
4
0 =−− qxwkdx
xwdEI b
and has the general solution:
( ) ( ) ( )b
xx
k
qeCeCxcosCxsinCxw 0
3210 −++⋅κ+⋅κ= ⋅κ−⋅κ
where 4
0EI
kb=κ .
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with constant
moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0>bk , 0=N , ( ) 0IxI = and
( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
0 =−− xqxwkdx
xwdEI b
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
ξξ⋅κξ⋅κ−ξξ⋅κξ⋅κ
+
ξξ−ξξ
κ
+++⋅κ+⋅κ=
∫∫
∫∫ξ⋅κ
⋅κ−ξ⋅κ−
⋅κ
⋅κ−⋅κ
xx
xxxx
b
xx
dcosqxsindsinqxcos
dqee
dqee
k
eCeCxcosCxsinCxw
11
11
3210
222
where 4
0EI
kb=κ . In the particular case ( ) xqqxq 10 += we have:
( ) ( ) ( ) xk
q
k
qeCeCxcosCxsinCxw
bb
xx 103210 −−++⋅κ+⋅κ= ⋅κ−⋅κ
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with variable
moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0>bk , 0=N , ( )xII = and
( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02 02
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−⋅+⋅+ qxwkdx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI b
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm. However, in the
particular case ( ) xeIxI ⋅α−= 1 and 00 =q we have:
( ) { } { } { } { }{ } { } { }{ }
{ } { }{ } { } { }{ } { } { }{ } { } { }{ }
α⋅+
α−⋅
+
α⋅+
α⋅=
⋅α⋅α
⋅α⋅α⋅α
1
43
1
42
1
41
1
40
011000110
0011221
EI
ke,,,,,,,GC
EI
ke,,,,,,GC
EI
ke,,,,,,GC
EI
ke,,,,pFqCkexw
b
x
b
x
b
x
b
x
p
x
where pFq is the generalized hyper-geometrical function:
{ }{ }( )( ) ( )( ) ( )∑
∞
=
⋅=0 1
1
11
1
k kpk
kpk
ppb...b
a...a
!kz,b,...,b,a,...,apFq
Here G is the Meijer function defined, for any real number r, as:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫ −
++ −−Γ−−Γ+Γ+Γ
+Γ+Γ−−Γ−−Γ
π=
ds
zrsb...rsbrsa...rsa
rsb...rsbrsa...rsa
i
r
b,...,b
a,...,azG
s
qmpn
mn
q
pmn
pq11
11
2 11
11
1
1
where ( ) ∫∞
−−=Γ0
1dtetz
tz .
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), without axial force, with variable
moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0>bk , 0=N , ( )xII = and
( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 022
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−⋅+⋅+ xqxwkdx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI b
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm.
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with
constant moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0>bk , 0>N ,
( ) 0IxI = and ( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) 002
2
4
4
0 =−−+ qxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI b
and has the general solution:
( )
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
p
bb
bb
eCeC
eCeCk
qxw
++−−
++−
+−−−
+−−
⋅+⋅
+⋅+⋅+−=
02
00
2
0
02
00
2
0
42
1
3
42
1
2
42
1
1
42
1
00
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with
constant moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0>bk , 0>N ,
( ) 0IxI = and ( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
4
4
0 =−−+ xqxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI b
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
ξξ−ξξ
++
β
+
ξξ−ξξ
+−
α
+⋅+⋅+⋅+⋅=
∫∫
∫∫
ξ⋅β⋅β−ξ⋅β−⋅β
ξ⋅α⋅α−ξ⋅α−⋅α
⋅β−⋅β⋅α−⋅α
x
x
x
x
bb
x
x
x
x
bb
xxxx
dqeedqeekEIN
N
k
dqeedqeekEIN
N
k
eCeCeCeCxw
110
2
110
2
3210
41
4
41
4
where ( )bkEINN
EI0
2
0
42
1++−=α and ( )
bkEINNEI
0
2
0
42
1+−−=β . In the
particular case ( ) xqqxq 10 += we have:
( )
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
bb
bb
bb
eCeC
eCeCxk
q
k
qxw
++−−
++−
+−−−
+−−
⋅+⋅
+⋅+⋅+−−=
02
00
2
0
02
00
2
0
42
1
3
42
1
2
42
1
1
42
1
010
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with
variable moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0>bk , 0>N ,
( )xII = and ( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02 02
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−+⋅+⋅+ qxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI b
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm.
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with compressive axial force, with
variable moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0>bk , 0>N ,
( )xII = and ( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 022
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−+⋅+⋅+ xqxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI b
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm.
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with constant
moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0>bk , 0<N , ( ) 0IxI = and
( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) 002
2
4
4
0 =−−− qxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI b
and has the general solution:
( )
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
b
bb
bb
eCeC
eCeCk
qxw
++−
++
+−−
+−
⋅+⋅
+⋅+⋅+−=
02
00
2
0
02
00
2
0
42
1
3
42
1
2
42
1
1
42
1
00
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with constant
moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0>bk , 0<N , ( ) 0IxI = and
( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02
2
4
4
0 =−−− xqxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwdEI b
and has the general solution provided by the algorithm:
( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
ξξ−ξξ
+−
β
+
ξξ−ξξ
+−
α
+⋅+⋅+⋅+⋅=
∫∫
∫∫
ξ⋅β⋅β−ξ⋅β−⋅β
ξ⋅α⋅α−ξ⋅α−⋅α
⋅β−⋅β⋅α−⋅α
x
x
x
x
bb
x
x
x
x
bb
xxxx
dqeedqeekEIN
N
k
dqeedqeekEIN
N
k
eCeCeCeCxw
110
2
110
2
3210
41
4
41
4
where ( )bkEINN
EI0
2
0
42
1+−=α and ( )
bkEINNEI
0
2
0
42
1++=β . In the particular
case ( ) xqqxq 10 += we have:
( )
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
xkEINNEI
bb
bb
bb
eCeC
eCeCxk
q
k
qxw
++−
++
+−−
+−
⋅+⋅
+⋅+⋅+−−=
02
00
2
0
02
00
2
0
42
1
3
42
1
2
42
1
1
42
1
010
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with variable
moment of inertia and with constant distributed load: for 0>bk , 0<N , ( )xII = and
( ) 0qxq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 02 02
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−−⋅+⋅+ qxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI b
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm.
Beam supported on elastic base (bed, support), with tensile axial force, with variable
moment of inertia and with variable distributed load: for 0>bk , 0<N , ( )xII = and
( )xqq = , the equation (3) becomes:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 022
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
=−−−⋅+⋅+ xqxwkdx
xwdN
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwd
dx
xdIE
dx
xwdxEI b
but the author did not find a general analytical solution or algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS
The generality of the above (mathematically both beautiful and powerful) models enables
their application in the study of the quasistatic bending of any mechanical structure equivalent
to a homogeneous straight beam (bar), examples for a NPP being: fuel elements, pressure
tubes, pipes, structural beams etc.
REFERENCES
[1.] BUZDUGAN GH., “Strength of Materials” (in Romanian), Editura Tehnică (publishing
house), Bucharest, 1980
[2.] CASE J., CHILVER A.H., and ROSS C.T.F, “Strength of Materials and Structures”,
Arnold (publishing house), London, 1999, ISBN: 0-340-71920-6
[3.] DEUTSCH I., “Strength of Materials” (in Romanian), Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică
(publishing house), Bucharest, 1979
[4.] DOCA C., “Bending of Beams; a falsifiable Essay” (in Romanian), University from
Piteşti (publishing house), 2007, ISBN: 978-973-690-683-1
[5.] POSEA N., “Strength of Materials” (in Romanian), Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică
(publishing house), Bucharest, 1979
[6.] RADEŞ M., “Strength of Materials” (in Romanian) Vol. I, Editura Printed (publishing
house), Bucharest, 2004
[7.] RADEŞ M., “Strength of Materials” (in Romanian) Vol. II, Editura Printed (publishing
house), Bucharest, 2007
[8.] da SILVA V.D., “Mechanics and Strength of Materials”, Springer-Verlag Berlin
Heidelberg 2006, ISBN: 10 3-540-25131-6
[9.] WOLFRAM S., “The MATHEMATICA®
Book”, WOLFRAM MEDIA (publishing
house), Champaingn, IL, USA, 2003, ISBN: 1-57955-022-3