20
Document info ch 10. Acoustooptic Devices Chapter 10 Physics 208, Electro-optics Peter Beyersdorf 1

ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

Document info ch 10.

Acoustooptic DevicesChapter 10

Physics 208, Electro-opticsPeter Beyersdorf

1

Page 2: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

Overview

Raman-Nath Diffraction (chapter 9)

AO Modulators

AO deflectors

Bandwidth

Figures of Merit

2

Page 3: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Raman-Nath Diffraction

Our expressions for the optical field diffracted from the acoustic wave assume there is only one diffracted order (m=±1). Is it possible to have |m|>1, corresponding to more than 1 phonon absorbed?

Conservation of energy requires k and k’ be almost the same length (except for the relatively small increase of k’ due to absorbed energy of phonon). This isn’t possible for more than one order at a time, with a unique K vector.

3

k

k’≈k

K2θk

k1

K2θ

k2

Page 4: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Acoustic Beam Spread

If the acoustic wave is a finite beam with width ΔX, Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation ΔxΔp≥ℏ/2 tells us it will have a range of K-vectors ΔK=1/(2ΔX).

If the range of K-vectors is large compared to the Bragg angle, multiple phonos to be absorbed without changing length of k’ relative to k.

4

k

k’≈k

K2θk

k1

K2θ

k2

kK2θ

k1

k2

Page 5: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Raman-Nath Criterion

Acoustic beam spread is ΔK=KΔΘ

Thus the Bragg angle (θb=λ/(2nΛ) )can be expressed in terms of the acoustic beam spread

Q>1 is called the “Bragg regime” and corresponds to single order diffraction

Q<1 is called the “Raman-Nath regime” and corresponds to multiple order diffraction 5

∆Θ = Λ2π∆X

∆Θ = ∆KK

Q = 2π λ∆XnΛ2

Page 6: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Raman-Nath Diffraction

Consider a narrow acoustic beam introducing a change in the index of refraction in a material of

an optical wave expressed by

is incident at x=0, upon exiting the acoutic beam at x=ΔX it can be written as

with

where θ is the direciton of the optical beam relative to the x-axis 6

!E = !E0ei(ωt−"k·"r)

∆n(0 < x < ∆X) = ∆n0 sin(Ωt− !K · !r)

!E = !E0ei(ωt−"k·"r−φ)

φ =∫ ∆X

0

1cos θ

ω

c∆ndx

Page 7: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Raman-Nath Diffraction

If ΔX is small (i.e. in the Rama-Nath regime), index n(x,t) seen by optical beam can be considered constant across beam width

giving

where

is called the modulation index. This can be expanded using a form of the Jacobi-Anger identity

7

φ =∆X

cos θ

ω

c∆n =

∆X

cos θ

ω

c∆n0 sin(Ωt− $K · $r)

!E = !E0ei(ωt−"k·"r−δ sin(Ωt− "K·"r))

δ ≡ ∆X

cos θ

ω

c∆n0

eiz cos φ =∞∑

n=−∞inJn(z)einφ

Page 8: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Bessel Function Expansion

Expanding

into Bessel functions gives

and the diffraction efficiency for the mth order diffracted beam is

8

!E = !E0ei(ωt−"k·"r−δ sin(Ωt− "K·"r))

!E = !E0

∞∑

m=−∞Jm(δ)ei((ω−mΩ)t−("k−m "K)·"r)

ηm = J2m(δ) = J2

m

(∆X

cos θ

ω

c∆n0

)

Page 9: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Bessel Function Expansion

9

ηm = J2m(δ) = J2

m

(∆X

cos θ

ω

c∆n0

)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

-1

-0.5

0.5

1 J0(δ)J1(δ) J2(δ)

δ

Page 10: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

sn.

Example

Calculate the acoustic beam width ΔX to maximize diffraction into the m=1 order for Δn0=0.0001, θ=00 and λ=633 nm. What fraction of the power gets diffracted into the m=1 beam?

J1(δ) is max at δ≈1.85, solving for ΔX we get ΔX=1.9 mmEvaluating η=J12(1.85)≈0.33

10

Page 11: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

Document info ch 10.

Acoustooptic DevicesChapter 10

Physics 208, Electro-opticsPeter Beyersdorf

11

Page 12: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

Acoustooptic Devices

Like the electrooptic effect, the acoustooptic effect can be used to construct Modulators, beam deflectors, frequency shifters, tunable filters.

Unlike the electrooptic effect, the electrical driving signal needs to be encoded on an RF carrier, rather than applied directly.

12

Page 13: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

AO ModulatorsThe diffraction efficiency in an acoustooptic interaction is

where L is the interaction length, θb is the Bragg angle, Ia is the acoustooptic intensity and

is a figure of merit for the material that depends on polarization and angle, the interaction configuration and the direction of propagation. At low acoustic intensity

any amplitude modulation of the acoustic signal can be used to modulate the intensity of the diffracted beam

13

η =Idiffracted

Iincident= sin2

(πL

λ√

2 cos θB

√MIa

)

M =n6p2

ρv3

η ≈ π2L2

2λ2 cos2 θBMIa

Page 14: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

AO Deflectors

The Bragg angle determines the direction of the diffracted beam and obeys

where Λ=v/f is the wavelength of the acoustic wave of frequency f with a speed of propagation v. Thus the Bragg angle can be written

since it is a small angle.

The angle of diffraction 2θb is linearly proportional to f. Thus frequency modulation of the acoustic signal can modulate the deflection angle of the diffracted beam

14

2Λ sin θ = λ/n

θB = sin−1 λf

2nν≈ λf

2nν

Page 15: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

Bandwidth

The analysis so far has assumed monochromatic optical and acoustic radiation (i.e. plane waves, not beams) and requires a unique acoustic K vector to meet Bragg condition

Modulation on acoustic wave is equivalent to introducing frequency components with different K-vectors. For these to produce diffraction the optical and/or acoustic beam has to have a range of k-vectors (i.e. be a beam not a plane wave)

The angular spread in the beams thus determines the useful modulation bandwidth of the device

15

k

k’≈k

K2θ

k

k’≈kK2θ

Page 16: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

Modulation Bandwidth

Differentiating expression for Bragg angle

gives a relation between the bandwidth Δf and the spread in the incident angle

but the spread in incident angle contains a contribution δθ≈2λ/(πnω0) from the optical beam with Gaussian waist ω0, and δφ≈Λ/L from the acoustic beam of width L

16

θB ≈λf

2nν

∆f =2nν cos θ

λ∆θ

∆θ = δθ + δφ

Page 17: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

Modulation Bandwidth

17

The modulation sidebands on the acoustic beam couple to different output angles for the optical beam. For the optical modulation sidebands to overlap the angular spread in the acoustic beam must equal or exceed that of the optical beam δφ≥δθ=λ/πnω0 giving a bandwdith

which is roughly equal to the reciprocal of the transit time of the acoustic wave across the optical beam

(∆f)m =12∆f =

πω0cos θ

Page 18: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

Modulation Bandwidth

18

Requiring the spread in optical beam not exceed the diffraction angle requires Δθ≤θb so that

where Δfm is the bandwidth of the signal that produces a spread in the acoustic frequency from f±Δf.

This means if the RF carrier frequency f can be modulated at a frequency up to f/2. Clearly if it were modulated at a frequency of f, there would be DC components that would fail to deflect the diffracted beam causing it to overlap with the undiffracted beam.

(∆f)m

f! ∆f

2f<

12

Page 19: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

Material Figures of MeritEfficiency and Bandwidth of a modulator are important properties that depend on the material and configuration geometry of the modulator. Various figures of merit relate these quantities of material independent of

19

M1 =n7p2

ρv

M2 =n6p2

ρv3

Proportional to the diffraction efficiency and the modulation bandwidth in a modulator of length L and heigh h where

2ηf0∆f =(

n2p2

ρν

)2π2

λ3 cos θB

(Pα

h

)

Proportional to the diffraction efficiency in a modulator of length L and heigh h at acoustic power Pa where

η =π2

2λ2 cos2 θB

(L

h

)M2Pa

Page 20: ch 10-Acoustooptic devices - San Jose State University

ch 10.

References

Yariv & Yeh “Optical Waves in Crystals” chapter 10

20