15
Cha Gune ! Thursday May 21st 2015 Home News Features Sports Business Opinion Editorial Obituaries Image Gallery Contact us NAVIGATE : Home » » THE CENTRAL BANK BOND SCAM: WHERE DOES THE BUCK STOP? THE CENTRAL BANK BOND SCAM: WHERE DOES THE BUCK STOP?

Chach Cha

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

test :P

Citation preview

Cha Gune !

ThursdayMay 21st 2015 Home News Features Sports Business Opinion Editorial Obituaries Image Gallery Contact us

NAVIGATE:

Home THE CENTRAL BANK BOND SCAM: WHERE DOES THE BUCK STOP?

THE CENTRAL BANK BOND SCAM:WHERE DOES THE BUCK STOP?

May 7, 2015, 7:08 pm

On 15th March Mr. Mahendran said that he would go on leave and appointed as Senior Deputy Governor the Chairman of the Tender Board which had handled the bond issue at Mr. Mahendrans behest. This officer is the most junior among the Deputy Governors of the Central Bank, and his appointment as Senior Deputy Governor at the time of Mr. Mahendrans temporary departure gave him the right to exercise all the powers and authority of the Governor during Mr. Mahendrans absence.The market had been told that 1 billion would be required when, in fact, 10 billion was accepted a situation without parallel at any time. The result was that the interest rate went up to 12.5%, and indeed most of the Perpetual Treasuries bonds were received at 12.5%. Having regard to the benchmark of 9.5% indicated as the expected yield in the guidance issued by the Central Bank, the interest rate differential is 3%. This situation, involving an intolerable burden on the public because of the unavoidable increase in the cost of living, is the direct result of the Governors action.The loss without comparison in our history is not finished and done with, but continuing and accumulating week after week, and month after month. Inactivity in the face of this scandal is unpardonable. Urgent action by Parliament, which has been called for by more than 90 Members of Parliament in a formal Resolution submitted to the Speaker last week can be delayed no longer.by Bandula Gunawardena,Member of Parliament

The Opposition is giving the highest priority to dealing with several aspects of what is undoubtedly the most colossal fraud and cover-up ever perpetrated on our people. We consider it our public duty to take every possible measure to mitigate the continuing and increasing loss to the nation.

To recall the history of this matter, several Cabinet Ministers, according to their public statements, expressed strong opposition to the proposal by the Prime Minister for the appointment of Mr. Arujuna Mahendran, to the post of Governor of the Central Bank. Despite these objections, the Prime Minister insisted on the appointment for which he took personal responsibility. When the scandal broke out into the public domain within the first 50 days of the new administration, the Prime Minister appointed a three member panel of lawyers to investigate the matter. This had the effect of pre-empting a thorough, competent and impartial investigation which His Excellency the President had proposed. We are now told that the Prime Ministers panel concluded that Mr. Mahendran is not "directly" responsible for the loss. On the basis of this purported finding, Mr. Mahendran is now back at work after temporary absence of leave.

Just as disturbing as the extent of the fraud, and its ramifications, is the sophisticated cover-up that was attempted. The evidence available indicates dishonesty of unimaginable proportions extending beyond the Central Bank to other public institutions, and warranting rapid and effective intervention by Parliament in the public interest.

Careful Preparation for the Fraud

According to fragments of the so-called report selectively leaked to the media, the primary responsibility is sought to be transferred to the Central Banks Department of Public Debt.

In the immediate run-up to the fraud, Governor Mahendran took a series of calculated steps to set the stage for it.

As a first step, he made several changes in the personnel of the Department of Public debt, the Central Banks single largest value department, handling 62 billion dollars of public debt. He removed the Superintendent of Public Debt, Mr. Dhammika Nanayakkara, and replaced him with Mrs. Deepa Seneviratne. He also removed the Deputy Governor in charge of Public Debt, Mr. Ananda Silva, and brought in Mr. M. Samarasiri who was subsequently elevated to the position of Senior Deputy Governor when Mr. Mahendran was compelled to go on leave. All this happened within the first month of Mr. Mahendrans tenure and two and a half weeks, before the bond issue.

Meanwhile, Perpetual Treasuries owned by Mr. Arjun Aloysius, Mr. Mahendrans son-in-law, was equally active. A few days prior to the bond issue, they liquidated some of their bond positions in order to have additional funds at their disposal to move into the new issue about which they clearly had information.

The Bond Issue Itself

Notice went out to all the primary dealers that the issue would be for Rs. 1 billion. There were 16 primary dealers and each had to bid for at least 10%. The total bids amounted to Rs. 20 billion.

The consistent practice of the Central Bank is that the Governor never attends the auction meeting at which the bids are considered. Departing inexplicably from this well established practice, Governor Mahendran not only attended the auction meeting personally but looked at the bids himself

The Next Developments

The market had been told that 1 billion would be required when, in fact, 10 billion was accepted a situation without parallel at any time. The result was that the interest rate went up to 12.5%, and indeed most of the Perpetual Treasuries bonds were received at 12.5%. Having regard to the benchmark of 9.5% indicated as the expected yield in the guidance issued by the Central Bank, the interest rate differential is 3%. This situation, involving an intolerable burden on the public because of the unavoidable increase in the cost of living, is the direct result of the Governors action.

Several serious elements of the fraud now become apparent:

(i) The Central Bank advised and announced to the primary dealers that bids were being entertained for Rs. 1 billion.

(ii) The guidance interest rate announced by the Central Bank was 9.5%.

(0) Perpetual Treasuries applied for Rs. 2 billion directly in their own name, and a further 11 billion through the Bank of Ceylon, when the Central Bank had called for bids of only 1 billion. Issues arise here relating to unethical and fraudulent leaking of information and intention to secure unjust enrichment at the expense of the State.

(i) The decision was made to accept Rs. 10 billion worth of bonds and, through that increase, Rs. 5 billion worth of bonds from Perpetual Treasuries, of which 2 billion were direct bids and the other 3 billion were through the Bank of Ceylon. The vast majority of these bonds were at the higher end of the cut-off point of 12.5%, although the guidance interest rate was 9.5% - a truly staggering differential.

The Cover-Up

We next see Governor Mahendran working assiduously to cover up the fraud. The steps taken after the fraud bear comparison with the meticulous preparations made by him prior to the event.

His main objective at this point is to try to justify, by artificial means, the increase in the interest rate brought about by his actions. He increases the interest rate by tightening monetary policy. This entails a bizarre contradiction because inflation in the country was coming down significantly, with the figure for January being only 3.2%. With the reduced prices of fuel in January, the figure for February, in the natural course of events, would have shown a further decrease. Contrary to this strong downward trend, Mr. Mahendran tightened monetary policy to force interest rates upwards. He did this by resorting to a particular strategy. Access that was limited by the Central Bank to its standing deposit facility of only 3 times at the 6.5% rate, and any excess to be only at 5%, was changed overnight, with the 5% penal rate being removed.

At this time, Dr. Harsha de Silva, Deputy Minister of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs, announced that a 3 member committee would be appointed to investigate the matter. Shortly afterwards. Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake stated that the committee would find that no wrong had been done by Mr. Mahendran.

On 15th March Mr. Mahendran said that he would go on leave and appointed as Senior Deputy Governor the Chairman of the Tender Board which had handled the bond issue at Mr. Mahendrans behest. This officer is the most junior among the Deputy Governors of the Central Bank, and his appointment as Senior Deputy Governor at the time of Mr. Mahendrans temporary departure gave him the right to exercise all the powers and authority of the Governor during Mr. Mahendrans absence.

On 17th March, with the controversy swirling around the government, the Prime Minister, in Parliament, made a statement in which he attempted, among other things, to justify the appointment of 3 lawyers of his choice to investigate his own nominee, the Governor of the Central Bank, and thereby stultify the independent investigation proposed by His Excellency the President.

Does the Buck Stop with Governor Mahendran?

The striking feature of this sordid saga is a pattern of sustained and intricate collusion clearly transcending the Governor and his role.

There are many questions which urgently require an answer in the public interest. A few will suffice at this stage by way of illustration.

Is it at all credible that the Bank of Ceylon would commit 11 billion rupees of public funds to bid on behalf of Perpetual Treasuries without authorization by higher authority? Who are the officials of the Bank of Ceylon responsible for this extraordinary action, and on what authority did they act? What is the link which unites the Central Bank, Perpetual Treasuries and the Bank of Ceylon throughout this sequence of events? What lies at the bottom of Governor Mahendrans unique behaviour in personally attending the auction and perusing the bids himself? Does anyone in their senses believe that his behaviour before, during and after the bond issue represents a series of fortuitous coincidences unrelated to collusion or instigation from elsewhere? Above all, is it in the least likely that the elaborate cover-up currently under way is for the protection of Mr. Mahendran alone?

In particular, the substantial role played by the Bank of Ceylon in this transaction, taken as a whole, cannot possibly be attributed to any decision or action by Mahendran himself.

The degree of direction and co-ordination evident in this regard is clearly indicative of a much wider, and higher level, operation. The compelling question which arises in these circumstances is whether Mahendran can be credibly regarded as the sole, or even the main, actor or whether he was, in fact, merely a cats paw.

Urgency of Parliamentary Action

The governments persistent state of denial is causing a haemorrhage of public funds which places a crippling burden on an entire generation, since the time span of this disgraceful transaction is 30 years.

The crucial need, in terms of ensuring integrity in public life and mitigating the immense loss inflicted on our people, is to ascertain who the actual beneficiaries of this fraud are and to apply to them the full gamut of sanctions prescribed by the civil and criminal law. The mishandling of public property and the abuse of fiduciary relationships represent aggravating aspects of the total situation. After all that has happened, the country is treated, adding insult to injury, to the spectacle of Governor Mahendran back at work in his exalted office, with cynical impunity.

The loss without comparison in our history is not finished and done with, but continuing and accumulating week after week, and month after month. Inactivity in the face of this scandal is unpardonable. Urgent action by Parliament, which has been called for by more than 90 Members of Parliament in a formal Resolution submitted to the Speaker last week can be delayed no longer.

Hits: 1577Send to Friend

HTMLCONTROL Forms.HTML:Image.1

HTMLCONTROL Forms.HTML:Option.1 www island.lk

Polls

Which Sri Lankan cricketer should be inducted into ICC Hall of Fame first?

Duleep Mendis

Arjuna Ranatunga

Aravinda de Silva

Sanath Jayasuriya

Muttiah Muralitharan

Total : 11335 Votes. Results

Announcements

Breaking News

Await Breaking News

Last Updated May 20 2015 | 10:23 pm

...

Featured News

Occupational respiratory...2015-05-20Read More

Factors in commercial organic...2015-05-20Read More

Bay of Bengal and Central Asian...2015-05-20Read More

A tale of two Presidents, six...2015-05-20Read More

Rape and judicial...2015-05-20Read More

Sekaram Family: Beautiful Sri...2015-05-20Read More

Kapruka Shopping|News

ARCHIVES RELATED LINKS

Thursday, 21st May 2015 [Current Issue] Wednesday, 20th May 2015 Tuesday, 19th May 2015 Monday, 18th May 2015 Sunday, 17th May 2015 Saturday, 16th May 2015 More Archives World Clock Currency Rates Weather

UPALI NEWSPAPERS (PVT) LTD Copyright Upali Newspapers (Pvt) Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Solution by Lankacom.

_1493759878.unknown

_1493759880.unknown

_1493759881.unknown

_1493759879.unknown

_1493759876.unknown

_1493759877.unknown

_1493759874.unknown

_1493759875.unknown

_1493759873.unknown