29
Challenges of Challenges of Electric-Power Electric-Power Industry Reforming Industry Reforming Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek June 15 June 15 th th , 2007 , 2007

Challenges of Electric-Power Industry Reforming Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek June 15 th, 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Challenges of Electric-Power Industry ReformingKyrgyzstan, Bishkek June 15th, 2007

  • Current conditions of power industryPower industry is not financially sustainable, does not provide required power supply. Growth of emergency outages: 1999 - 8000, 2000 - 10000 , 2001 - 13000. 2006 electric power losses in REC-38% (3,8 bln. kWt/h). Whilst energy output - 3,9 bln. Som, received 3 bln. som (79%). Accounts receivable as of 2006 has been increased on 474 million Som (17%). Losses during 4 months of 2007 are equal to 41,5%, including commercial losses - 19% (900 million. kWt/h, 560 million Som). Losses of RECs JSC Severelectro 46%, JSC Vostokelectro 40%, JSC Oshelectro 36%, JSC Zhalalabatelectro 38%. RECs have collected 64% of funds. Indebtedness has been increased on 377 million Som (12%) over 4 months. In 1996, indebtedness for RECs were equal to 482 million Som. In 2006, indebtedness was equal to 3 176 million Som. Over 1996-2006, indebtedness has been increased on 2,7 bln Som. RECs run up a bill to electric power suppliers and for transit - 5,9 bln. Som. From 2001, indebtedness was increased on 5 billion Som per year. In 2002-2005, the companies sustained more than 3 bln Som of losses.Reconstruction works are implemented on 20-40%, depreciation is 70% and more.

  • Problems in the sector Stagnation in conduction of reforms in energy sector;Imperfect tariff policy on electric, thermal energy and natural gas; Inefficient state social protection of consumers; Non-transparency of informational and financial activity of energy companies; Absence of influence mechanisms on energy monopolists (from side of consumers, court system and Government); Energy companies got significantly behind of generally agreed standards on technological indicators (specific fuel consumption, effective average of equipment, work capacity of stations, etc.); Absence of incentives for rational planning of energy production and consumption regimes as well as energy saving and energy efficiency; Outages of power supply take place in some districts, electric power insufficiency leads to so-called rotating blackout, all signs of energetic crisis were observed;There was a growth of emergency outages, there is a high possibility of major accidents; Payment discipline is absent, payment defaults are spread; Access to energy sector is closed for new independent companies.

  • First steps towards the reform To possess of political will of conduction of the reforms; Consumers, including community, have to know and support goals of the reforms;To create required legislative and normative base;To created required institutional environment; To introduce market methodology of formation of tariffs; Gradual decrease of state participation and increase of private sector in development of energy system; Implementation of tariff policy, creating conditions for widened reproduction of power energy;

  • Change of ownership form and management of energy distributing companies;Taking technical and administrative measures on rapid decrease of energy loss;Development (under active attraction of private investors) domestic infrastructure for transportation of electric power and energy carriers, which will allow increase of own energy resources and to decrease their import;Adjustment of water use issues with neighboring countries and increase of electric power export, as well as transfer to market principles on reciprocal payment;Thorough analysis and use of possibilities of domestic production of oil products, coal and non-traditional energy resources.

  • Goals of energy industry reforms It is essential to make decisions on the following issues:Gradual decrease of state participation and increase of private sector in development of energy system;Implementation of tariff policy, creating conditions for widened reproduction of power energy; Privatization of energy distributing companies; Making technical and administrative measure on rapid decrease of electric power loss;Development (under active attraction of private investors) domestic infrastructure for transportation of electric power and energy carriers, which will allow increase of own energy resources and to decrease their import;

    Adjustment of water use issues with neighboring countries and increase of electric power export, as well as transfer to market principles on reciprocal payment; Thorough analysis and use of possibilities of domestic production of oil products, coal and non-traditional energy resources.

  • Restructuring of energy industry

  • Stages of energy industry reforming Asset assessment of energy sector Separation of subsidiary production and social objectsRestructuring and creation and new stock companiesChanging of ownership form and management

  • Management models of energy industryVertical integrated companySingle buyer competition between producersCompetition of whole sale market (between producers and distributors)Competition on retail market between all market players there is an influence of consumer on all companies of energy sector

  • Background of energy industry reforms Collapse of the USSR Choice democratic community and transition to market economyHyperinflationPrice increase on energy resourcesTransition to electric power for domestic useLack of financial resourcesNeed in financial borrowings Negotiations with international financial institutionsIncurrence of liability for international institutions.

  • Legislative and institutional baseLaws On energy, On electric energy, On licensing, On antimonopoly regulation Bodies involved in energy management Parliament, Government, President Foundation of the State property managementAntimonopoly regulation body Corruption control agency State regulator Ministry of Labor and Social Protection Ministry of economic development and trade Ministry of Justice Ministry of Finance State organ on technical supervision in energy sector Water Department

  • Regional cooperation Decrease of loss - RK 9% 5843HWt/h, KR 11% -1392HWt/h, RT 15% -1988 HWt/h, RU 10%-4064HWt/h, in addition, annually - 13 287 HWt/h Investments to decrease of loss during transfer and distributions in all four countries 3 00 million US dollars.Rehabilitation of producing assets of Syr-Darya, Angren Hydro-Electro Stations, Tashkent Thermal Electric Station would need 1,15 bln US dollars, generation - 32000 Hwt/h. Ekibastuz HES I and II, Aksu and Karaganda HES would need 1,070 million US dollars, will be equal to 17 118 Hwt/h. New projects on generation Ekibastuz HES II, Bishkek TESII, Kambarata, Kambarata II, Rogunskaya HES, Sangutdinsky HES, Talimardzhanskaya In four countries it is possible to increase from 139 TWt/h up to 228 TWt/h. 54% of additional electric energy in new stations, 16% of additional electric energy due to decrease of losses, as well as remaining 30% - due to rehabilitation of the old generating aggregates. Contribution of additional generation of RK -45%, RU, RT- 22% each and KR-9%. Investments will lead to average additional costs on 1kWt/h on 2,1 cent in RT; 2,3 KR; 2,8- RK; 3,5 RU. Total- 13 bln. US dollars for 20 years.

  • Tariff policy in energy electric power industry

  • Goal of tariff policyGoal of tariff policy is remaining on generation, , setting up and implementation of economically reasonable price and tariff formation, introduction of more efficient structure of tariffs and bringing them in line with real costs, as well as annual decrease of quasi-fiscal deficit in electric power industry to the level recommended by the International Monetary Fund (goal of the Mid-term tariff policy on electric and thermal energy for 2003-2006 and 2007-2010).

  • Principles of tariff policyFundamental principle of tariff policy is introduction of self-sufficiency principles of energy sector and lies in taking measures on creation of investment attractive environment in energetic sector of economy.

  • Main principles of tariff policy:Tariffs have to reflect full cost of production, transmission and distribution of electric and thermal energy, including costs for exploitation and technical services, as well as compensation of invested capital;Tariffs for each group of consumers have to reflect all costs for electric and thermal supply on that category of consumers; Existing cross-subsidizing from one group of consumers into the other group should be gradually excluded; Subsidies should be devoted to the consumers (community) with low level of income through programs of social protection;Minimal volume of energy consumption for provision with vital needs with taking into consideration of electric food making has to stay in limits up to 150 kWt/h per month and all other benefits should be reconsidered or called off (principle of Basing tariff policy on electric and thermal power energy for 1998-2000).

  • Existing Methods of tariff calculation for final consumers

    Prognosis FactGeneration, kW/h 100 100 100 Loss level, %22%42%42%Sale, kW/h 78 58 58 Tariff, Som/kWh 0,62 0,83 0,62 Income, Som 48,36 48,36 35,96 Costs, Som 48,36 48,36 35,96 includingrepairs 14,51 14,51 5,51 New construction 9,67 9,67 1,93 Credit repayment 5,80 5,80 5,80 Income tax 0,97 0,97 0,70 Dividends of paper 6,71

  • At the moment, there has been implementation only of principles of exclusion of consumptions sills for community due to analysis data:Separation of consumption on sills and setting up of different prices have led to distortion (manipulation) of companies reports and decrease of income of the company (plundering); () ();Thus, plundering have led to decrease of required funds for repairs and replacement of energy equipment, decreasing efficiency of the industry; Social groups of community with higher level of income use sufficient benefits. At the moment, that particular group is continuing to use low tariffs due to weakness and insufficiency of social protection.

  • Allegations effecting on price formation in the Kyrgyz RepublicTARIFFSMYTH OF ENERGY INDEPENDENCY SOCIAL PROTECTION POLYTICAL WILL FALSE REPRESENTATION INCREASE OF LOSSES DECREASE OF COLLECTION

  • Mineral fuel depositsUnit of measureKazakhstanKyrgyzstanTajikistanTurkmenistanUzbekistanTotalCrude oilmillion tones1 1005,51,775821 264,2Gasmillion tones1 5005,05,02 2521 4765 238Coalmillion tones24 300580500 Insignificant2 85128 231Totalmillion tones26 9005915072 3274 40934 733% of Total77,4%1,7%1,5%6,7%12,7%100%Hydro-potentialHW\h/year27 000163 000317 0002 00015 000524 000Million tones/year2,314,027,30,21,345,1% of Total%5,231,160,50,42,9100

  • Kyrgyzstan can become energy independentRepublic possesses insignificant deposits of hydrocarbon fuel;Demand on energy carriers can be covered by only one energy resource, hydro electric energy, in particular; Republic possesses significant hydro potential, but it is only used on 10%; It is important to take into consideration that water resources are dependant on climate conditions. There is significant time repugnance between demand on electric energy and water regimes. Existing energy capacity in 5-7 years would hardly cover growing demand in domestic market;Further development of hydro potential requires large investments which can not be provided by domestic resources of the country.

  • Chart1

    2237.47

    2235.9

    2235.9

    2138

    2038.9

    Normative

    Fact losses

    %

    Losses dynamics of distributing companies during 2001-2005

    2

    () " "

    /20012002200320042005

    1 ""38.7044.9640.0039.8041.00

    2 ""35.9137.7435.5037.7035.40

    3 "-"26.0024.9025.9030.3037.70

    4 ""19.5023.9734.5039.3038.00

    5 " "10.5110.038.156.346.05

    200138.7019.5035.9126.0010.51

    200244.9623.9737.7424.9010.03

    200340.0034.5035.5025.908.15

    200439.8039.3037.7030.306.34

    200541.0038.0035.4037.706.05

    20012002200320042005

    Normative222222212019

    Fact losses37.4735.935.93838.9

    &R&"Arial Cyr,"&12&U 1

    2

    Normative

    Fact losses

    %

    2001-2005

  • Commercial losses include:Unaccounted consumption of electric energy; Consumers, having wrong bills or not paying fully actually consumed electric energy; Consumers, having right bills, but being careless towards their payments.

  • Unaccounted consumption of electric energy includes the following: Plundering of electric energy by consumers through interruption of counter functions of through shift of it; Malfunctioning counters which do not register consumed electric energy by proper order;Plundering of electric energy through illegal connection of unregistered consumers; and Raising of bills and collection of payments on consumed electric energy not based on figures of the counter, but on rate of consumption (i.e. estimated usage depending on accommodation area and quantity of residents.)

  • Collection of funds

  • Technical conditions of electric networks 0,4-10 kW, carried on the balance of distributing companies as of 01.01.2000

    Measure unit TotalGoodFairRequires restoration% 6-10 km26959121639779501719% 0,4 km27940955610164822029% 6-10 km138735257745833% 0,4 km99719350529930%Total lengthkm5728322264210251399424%Specific weight39%37%24%TP 6-10/0,4kWUnits 1904779287835328417%Specific weight42%41%17%

  • Chart2

    3.73.7

    3.82.3

    4.14.1

    2.31.2

    55

    2.10.4

    43.1

    3.51

    required tariff

    fact tariff

    cent/kWh

    Underrun comparison of fact tariff level from required level in CIS countries

    Sheet1

    (% ) (US/) (US/) (% ) (% -)

    1.13.73.7901081.6

    9.82.33.830517.2

    5.54.14.135533.3

    121.22.3333511.1

    3.355751961

    21.40.42.186513.9required tarifffact tariff

    1.1%5.33.14871358.8Armenia3.73.7

    9.8%15.913.5501812.3Azerbaijan3.82.3

    5.5%Georgia4.14.1

    12.0%Kyrgyzstan2.31.2

    3.3%Moldova55

    21.4%Tajikistan2.10.4

    5.3%Ukraine43.1

    15.9%Uzbekistan3.51

    Sheet1

    Sheet2

    required tariff

    fact tariff

    /

    Sheet3

  • Executive Summary Need in generation of electric energy will be increasing due to stabilization and growth of industrial sectors and agriculture, whilst tariff control for community and agricultural consumers on a low level and retaining of growth trend of energy losses in networks and consumption by the community. Problem of electric energy lack can not be resolved due to resources of existing HES. In that case, if there is no decrease of electric energy loss that it will be required to build new hydro electro-stations of to increase generation on TES. All listed measures require financial investments. Energy companies will have to define what is more profitable, quicker pay back period, ability or willingness of consumer to pay expenses. Lack of capacity of generation can not be considered as an argument for building of new electro stations or increase of generation in TES. It hardly be economically reasoned under existing problems in networks and current tariffs for electric energy.

  • It is important to outline that transfer of tariff reform to later terms will be less painful for the whole community, due to the fact that it will require higher level for increase of tariffs and creation of expensive systems of address social protection.