24

CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE
Page 2: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

BACKGROUND

• KELAWER LEGISLATION

- ENTITLEMENT – EFFICACY

• FDA DERMATOLOGY

- CORTICOID CLASS LABEL

PSORIASIS

ATOPIC DERMATITIS

- DOUBLE BLIND “PLACEBO”

CONTROLLED DATA

2

Page 3: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PHOTOGRAPHY

EXAMPLAR – ACNE

COOK METHOD: (ARCH DERM, 115, 571,79)

• OBJECTIVE

• INTRA & INTER GRADES CONSISTENCIES

• VERIFICATION

• TRAINING & VALIDATING GRADERS

(CHIANG: SKIN LESION METRICS

– ROLE OF PHOTOGRAPH)

(AGACHE: SKIN METRIC, 2ND Ed, SPRINGER)

3

Page 4: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PHOTOGRAPHY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT – MPA

FINASTERIDE (1 mg) vs PLACEBO)

J A A D: 67: 379, 2012)

4

Page 5: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PROOF OF CONCEPT

• PAIRED COMPARISON –

SULZBERGER WW II

• PRINCIPLE:

EYES GREAT COMPARITOR

• EXAMPLAR:

SMALL PLAQUE ASSAY PSORIASIS

• ADVANTAGE: PERHAPS LESS TOXIC DATA NEEDED

• DISADVANTAGE: LESS DISCRIMINATING HUMAN TOX INFO

5

Page 6: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PROOF OF CONCEPT

6

A

B

ARMITAGE DESIGN

SMALLER GROUPS POSSIBLE

Page 7: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

ALOPECIA

7

HAIR WEIGHT

Page 8: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PLACEBO

8

BENZOYL PEROXIDE TOPICAL

PER CENT REDUCTION

ACTIVE

PLACEBO

NON-INFLAMMATORY 41%

27%

(14 D.)

INFLAMMATION 34

28

(6)

SUCCESS 28

15

(13)

(VALUE OF “NO TREATMENT” GROUPS)

(LAMEL, 2012)

Page 9: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

ACTIVE vs PLACEBO

9

NAME REDUCTION BY BRAND (%)

REDUCTION BY VEHICLE (%)

0.1 % TRETINOIN CREAM 39 (143) 20 (139)

0.1% ADAPALENE CREME 32 (294) 17 (293)

5% DAPSONE GEL 38 (1,506) 31 (1,504)

1% CLINDAMYCIN 38 (162) 27 (82)

0.1% ADAPALENE + 2.5% BP 50 (564) 27 (489)

1% CLINDAMYCIN + 5% BP 47 (215) 20 (168)

1% CLINDAMYCIN + 5% BP 54 (397) 19 (177)

0.0255 TRETINOIN GEL 41 (845) 23 + 5.0

MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0

Page 10: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PLACEBO RESPONSE

10

Page 11: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PLACEBO RESPONSE

11

Page 12: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PLACEBO RESPONSE

12

PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS

OVERALL 4.1%

RANGE 0 – 18 %

NOTE THE 0 PLACEBO EFFECT

(LAMEL: ARCH DERM RES, 304:707)

Page 13: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PERCUTANEOUS PENETRATION & BIOEQUIVALENCE

13

• 15 STEPS

(NOT ONE IN VITRO STEP)

(NGO, AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOC, 2012)

Steps Factors determining percutaneous absorption

1 Release from vehicle

-Varies with solubility in vehicle, concentration, and pH, et al.

2 Kinetics of skin penetration

- Influenced by anatomical site, degree of occlusion, intrinsic skin condition, animal age, concentration of

dosing solution, surface area dosed, frequency of dosing, post absorption, etc.

3 Excretion kinetics

4 Tissue disposition

5 Substantivity to skin

6 Wash effects

- Wash resistance; Wash enhancement

7 Rub effects

-Rub resistance; Rub enhancement

8 Transfer – skin, clothing + inanimate surface

9 Exfoliation

10 Volatility

11 Binding – all layers

12 Anatomic pathways

13 Lateral spread

14 Vascular perfusion**

15 Cutaneous metabolism

Page 14: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PERCUTANEOUS PENETRATION

14

INFLUENCE OF SKIN MODEL

IN VITRO PERFORMANCE

(INT J PHARMAC 434: 80)

Page 15: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

PERCUTANEOUS PENETRATION

15

INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION

ORAL vs DERMAL

(J PHARM SCI, 101: 4293, 2012)

Page 16: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

SAFETY

16

DRUG FDA APPROVAL WITHDRAWAL

YEAR YEAR

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BITHIONOL - - - 1967

DIBROMSALAN - - - 1975

METABROMSALAN - - - 1975

TRIBOMOSALAN - - - 1975

3,3,4,5– TETRACHLOROSALICYLANILIDE

- - - 1975

CHLOROFORM - - - 1976

Page 17: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

SAFETY – con’t.

17

DRUG FDA APPROVAL WITHDRAWAL YEAR YEAR

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AZARIBINE (TRIAZURE TABLETS 1975 1977

ZIRCONIUM AEROSOL - - - 1977

POTASSIUM ARSENITE - - - 1980

(FOWLER’S SOLUTION)

CHLOROHEXIDINE GLUCONATE 1978 1984

TOPICAL TINCTURE (HIBITANE)

TEMAFLOXACIN (OMNIFLOX) 1992 1992

Page 18: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

SAFETY – con’t.

18

DRUG FDA APPROVAL WITHDRAWAL YEAR YEAR

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TERFENADINE (SELDANE) 1985 1997

ASTEMIZOLE (HISMANAL) 1988 1999

ETRETINATE (TEGISON) 1986 2002

EFALIZUMAB (RAPTIVA) 2003 2009

M. MARTIN: DERM DRUGS WITHDRAWN FOR SAFETY. DERMATOTOXICOLOGY, 8TH Ed, INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 2012.

Page 19: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

“COMPARATIVE

EFFECTIVENESS OF NEW

MARKETED MEDICATIONS”

19

& BIOENGINEERING

(CLIN PHARM & THER 90: 777)

Page 20: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

COURSES / INSTITUTE

20

(SPECIALIZIED)

EVIDENCE – BASED TRAINING

(INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY – CODIFIED)

• EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

• GRADING

• “CERTIFICATION”

Page 21: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

ROLE OF 21ST CENTURY

MEDICINE’S REGULATOR

21

(M. LUMPKIN: CLIN PHARM THER 92: 486, 2012)

Page 22: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

22

• FDA’S ROLE

• INTERNATIONAL REGULATORS

SEEN ALL (OR ALMNOST ALL) –

DATA AND LEARNED

Page 23: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE

FUNDING

23

• GOVERNMENT

• INDUSTRY

• “PHILANTHROPHY”

Page 24: CHALLENGES WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ...MEAN + SD 42 + 7.1 23 + 5.0 PLACEBO RESPONSE 10 PLACEBO RESPONSE 11 PLACEBO RESPONSE 12 PSORIASIS BIOLOGICS OVERALL 4.1% RANGE 0 – 18 % NOTE