Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHAMPAIGN UNIT 4 SCHOOL DISTRICTTIER 2 PRESENTATION - CONCEPTUAL SITE TEST FITSMARCH 31, 2016
• Tier II Charge
• Updated School Options• Dr. Howard• South Side• IPA• Edison• Centennial
• Budget Methodology
AGENDA
Tier II ChargeBased on recommendation from the Tier I Committee for elementary, middle and high school facility needs:
“The charge of the Tier Two Committee will be to discuss possible site options to support high school capacity and programming needs, potential partnerships for shared facilities, financing, and referendum timeline. A final report highlighting recommendations will be prepared and presented to the Board of Education”
Draft - March 31th, 2016
Selection Criteria (draft)
Draft - March 31th, 2016
Educational Adequacy• Provided for program requirements• Provides appropriate adjacencies
Site Considerations• Cars/buses/traffic/parking/pedestrian• PE/Athletic fields
Operational Implications• Accommodates enrollment growth• Safety
Implementation Phasing• Temporary facilities• Construction logistics
Cost Implications• First time costs• Long term benefits
DR. HOWARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Dr. Howard Elementary School(DRAFT) 2.67 Acres
Existing Area: 43,389 gsfExisting Enrollment 343 students
Parent
Bus
Draft - March 31th, 2016
one-wayW University Ave
W Park St
N J
ames
St
Requirements:• Replacement School
Dr. Howard Elementary SchoolOption 1 (DRAFT)
Three Story Replacement School
Gym/Café
Parking
Play Fields
Play Ground
2.67 AcresEducational Adequacy:• Pro - Fulfills Tier I recommendations• Pro - Zoning of gym/café for after-hours and evening use• Pro – Maintains neighborhood school
Site Considerations:• Pro - Separates differing traffic modes (bus/car/walk)• Pro - More efficient use of site • Pro - Consolidated parking• Pro - Locates outdoor play space away from more
heavily trafficked University Ave
Operational Implications:• Pro - Accommodates enrollment• Pro - Includes current best practices regarding safety
Implementation Phasing:• Pro - Classroom wing can be built clear of existing
building (no student relocation necessary)• Con - Gym addition requires demolition of annex
(extends construction due to phasing)
Cost Implications• Pro – Long term cost benefit• Con – Phasing associated costs
Draft - March 31th, 2016Parent
Bus
one-wayW University Ave
W Park St
N J
ames
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
one-wayW University Ave
W Park St
N Ja
mes
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
one-wayW University Ave
W Park St
N Ja
mes
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
one-wayW University Ave
W Park St
N Ja
mes
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
one-wayW University Ave
W Park St
N Ja
mes
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
one-wayW University Ave
W Park St
N Ja
mes
St
SOUTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
South Side Elementary School(DRAFT)Requirements:• Gym• PE Storage• Accessibility (ADA)• Special Education• Instructional Materials• Music• Eliminate Portable Classrooms
Parent Drop-off
Existing Area: 26,800 gsfExisting Enrollment 303 students
SouthSideES
Mellon
Draft - March 31th, 2016Parent
Bus
GYM
Playground
PLA
YGR
OU
ND
Parent Drop-off
South Side Elementary SchoolOption 1 (DRAFT)
Parent Drop-off
Educational Adequacy:• Pro - Fulfills Tier I recommendations• Pro – Good zoning of gym/café for after-hours and
evening use• Pro – Maintains neighborhood school• Pro – Removes portable classrooms
Site Considerations:• Pro - Separates differing traffic modes (bus/car/walk)• Pro - Efficient use of site • Con – Addition requires playground relocation
Operational Implications:• Pro - Accommodates enrollment• Pro - Includes current best practices regarding safety
Implementation Phasing:• Pro – Addition can be built clear of existing building (no
student relocation necessary)• Con – Phasing or temporary relocation may be required
for remodeling
Cost Implications• Pro – Reuse of existing building less costly
Draft - March 31th, 2016Parent
Bus
Draft - March 31th, 2016
Draft - March 31th, 2016
INTERNATIONAL PREP ACADEMY
International Prep Academy(DRAFT)Requirements:• Add 6th to 8th Grades• Gym• Library (right sized)• Resource Room (dual language)• Expanded Multi-Purpose
8.54 Acres
Existing Area: 43,000 gsfExisting Enrollment 233 students
Draft - March 31th, 2016Parent
Bus
W Kirby Ave
1 Story 6th-8th
Gym
Lib
6th-8th
Play Ground
International Prep AcademyOption 1 (DRAFT) 8.54 Acres
Cafeteria Expansion
Educational Adequacy:• Pro - Fulfills Tier I recommendations• Pro - Right-sizes library, increases cafeteria, adds gym• Con – More difficult zoning of gym/café for after-hours
and evening use
Site Considerations:• Pro - Separates differing traffic modes (bus/car/walk)• Con – One story addition requires more site area• Con – Less efficient site• Con – South addition requires playground relocation• Con – Configuration results in narrow courtyard
Operational Implications:• Pro - Accommodates enrollment (adds grades 6th – 8th)• Pro - Includes current best practices regarding safety• Pro – Keeps entire building on one level
Implementation Phasing:• Pro – Addition can be built clear of existing building (no
student relocation necessary)• Con – Phasing or temporary relocation may be required
for remodeling
Cost Implications• Pro – Reuse of existing building less costly
Draft - March 31th, 2016Parent
Bus
W Kirby Ave
Lib
6th-8th
Play Ground
2 Story 1st Floor3rd – 5th
2nd Floor6th-8th
Gym
International Prep AcademyOption 2 (DRAFT) 8.54 Acres
Cafeteria Expansion
Educational Adequacy:• Pro - Fulfills Tier I recommendations• Pro - Right-sizes library, increases cafeteria, adds gym• Pro – Consolidates middle school age students on
second floor• Con – More difficult zoning of gym/café for after-hours
and evening use
Site Considerations:• Pro - Separates differing traffic modes (bus/car/walk)• Pro – Efficient use of site via two story addition• Pro – More contiguous playground space (supervision)
Operational Implications:• Pro - Accommodates enrollment (adds grades 6th – 8th)• Pro - Includes current best practices regarding safety• Pro – Demolition of south wing solves ADA issue
Implementation Phasing:• Pro – Classroom addition can be built clear of existing
building • Con – Phasing or temporary relocation may be required
for remodeling• Con – Construction duration likely longer due to phasing
Cost Implications• Con – Demolished building area requires replacement
Draft - March 31th, 2016Parent
Bus
W Kirby Ave
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Kirby Ave
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Kirby Ave
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Kirby Ave
EDISON MIDDLE SCHOOL
Edison Middle School(DRAFT)Requirements:• Cafeteria Expansion• Science/STEM• Expanded Parking• Larger Gym Dividable
3.48 Acres
Existing Area: 112,659 gsfExisting Enrollment 659 students
Parent
MTD BusBus
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Healey St
S P
rair
ie S
t
W Green St
S S
tate
St
Expanded Parking
Three Story AdditionGym
Edison Middle School(DRAFT) 3.48 Acres
Parent
MTD BusBus
Educational Adequacy:• Pro - Fulfills Tier I recommendations• Pro – Cafeteria, Science/STEM• Pro – Good zoning of gym/café for after-hours and
evening use
Site Considerations:• Pro - Separates differing traffic modes (bus/car/walk)• Pro – Expanded parking to north• Pro – Efficient use of site via addition• Con – Does not solve current lack of contiguous
playfields
Operational Implications:• Pro – Accommodates enrollment• Includes current best practices regarding safety• Pro - Renovation of existing original building (good
bones)
Implementation Phasing:• Con – Phasing or temporary relocation likely for addition
and remodeling• Con – Construction duration likely longer due to phasing
Cost Implications• Con – Demolished building area requires replacement
Gym
Café
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Healey St
S P
rair
ie S
t
W Green St
S S
tate
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Healey St
S Pr
airie
St
W Green St
S St
ate
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Healey St
S Pr
airie
St
W Green St
S St
ate
St
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W Healey St
S Pr
airie
St
W Green St
S St
ate
St
CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Turf
Existing Area: 202,577 gsfExisting Enrollment 1,422 students
Centennial High SchoolOption 1 (DRAFT)Requirements:• 1,700 Student Capacity• Additional Classrooms• CTE• Expanded Cafeteria• Multi-court Gym + Jogging Track• Weight/Fitness• PE/Athletic Support Spaces• Eliminate Portable Classrooms• Turf Stadium Field
Draft - March 31th, 2016
W John St
Ken
woo
d R
d
Cre
scen
t D
r
Sangamon Dr
Centennial High SchoolOption 1 (DRAFT) 23.28 Acres
GYM
CTE
CAFÉ
CLASSROOMS
SUPPORT
SUPP
ORT
WT.
FIT.
Expanded Parking
Turf
Educational Adequacy:• Pro - Fulfills Tier I recommendations• Pro – Cafeteria, Science/STEM, Classrooms, CTE, PE
Site Considerations:• Pro – Multi-story design uses less site area• Con – Gym addition reduces parking (although expansion
potential to north)
Operational Implications:• Pro – Accommodates enrollment• Includes current best practices regarding safety
Implementation Phasing:• Pro – Additions can be built with minimal disruption• Pro – Additions can be used as flex space during
remodeling• Con – Remodeling will require phasing/disruption• Con – Construction duration likely longer due to phasing
Cost Implications• Pro – Reuse of existing building less costly
Draft - March 31th, 2016
Ken
woo
d R
d
Cre
scen
t D
r
FIELDHOUSE
CTE
CAFÉ
CLASSROOMS
SUPPORT
SUPP
ORT
WT.
FIT.
Expanded Parking
Centennial High SchoolOption 2 (DRAFT) 23.28 Acres
Turf
Educational Adequacy:• Pro - Fulfills Tier I recommendations• Pro – Cafeteria, Science/STEM, Classrooms, CTE, PE• Pro – Enhanced PE/Athletics via fieldhouse
Site Considerations:• Pro – Multi-story design uses less site area• Con – Fieldhouse addition further reduces parking
(although expansion potential to north)
Operational Implications:• Pro – Accommodates enrollment• Includes current best practices regarding safety
Implementation Phasing:• Pro – Additions can be built with minimal disruption• Pro – Additions can be used as flex space during
remodeling• Con – Remodeling will require phasing/disruption• Con – Construction duration likely longer due to phasing
Cost Implications• Pro – Reuse of existing building less costly
Draft - March 31th, 2016
Ken
woo
d R
d
Cre
scen
t D
r
W John St
Kenw
ood
Rd
Cres
cent
Dr
Sangamon Dr
Draft - March 31th, 2016
Kenw
ood
Rd
Cres
cent
Dr
Draft - March 31th, 2016
Kenw
ood
Rd
Cres
cent
Dr
Tier 1,2 Committee Work
Prioritize Needs
Consider Options
Available Funds Identified
Set the Budget
Design to the Budget
Several Design Milestones
Several Estimates to Maintain Budget
Public per State Board of Ed
Competitive & Sealed Bids
Minority Participation Goals
Determines Actual Cost
Lowest Responsible Bidders
Subcontractors & Vendors Selected
Contracts Executed
Cost Commitment
Budget -> Set by Board of Education
Estimate -> Design to the Budget
Bid -> Determines Cost
Cost -> Commitment by Contract
Includes
• Labor
• Materials
• Equipment
• Contingencies
• Cost Escalators due to time
Insurance & Bonds
Field Offices
Job Site Fencing / Security
Document Printing
Dumpsters
Material Testing
Overhead
Demolition
Utilities
Public Street Improvements
Hazardous Material Abatement
Site Readiness
Drainage
Parking Lots
Athletic Fields
Landscaping
Site Improvements
New Buildings
Additions & Renovations
Phasing
Heating & Cooling Upgrades
Electrical & Plumbing Upgrades
Buildings
Architect & Engineer
Construction Manager
Legal
Bond Counsel
Professional Fees
Purchased Property
Abandoned Property
Surveys
Title Search
Site Acquisition & Disposition
Classroom Furniture
Lab Equipment
Technology
Security Systems
Performing Arts Equipment
CTE Equipment
Athletic Equipment
Furnishings, Fixtures, Equipment (FF&E)
Budget For Total Project Cost
QUESTIONS?