Upload
hanhi
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Changes to the
Construction Act: Payment
certainty…uncertain terms
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
Craig J Enderbury BSc DipArb MACostE FCIArb
Director – Hill International (UK) Ltd
Objectives
To understand the amendments to
Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act
1996
by virtue of the
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
by virtue of the
The Local Democracy, Economic Development and
Construction Act 2009
Latham Report 1994 “Constructing the Team”
identified;
• Poor Payment Practices
• Disputes – extensive, expensive and time consuming
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
consuming
• HGCRA 1996 came into force on May 1st 1998 together with the Scheme for Construction Contracts (E&W) Regulations 1998.
Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
s104 Definition of Construction Contract
s105 Meaning of Construction Operations
s106 Residential occupiers
s107 Construction Contract to be in writing
s108 Right to Adjudicate
s109 Entitlement to stage payments
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
s109 Entitlement to stage payments
s110 Payment notices
s111 Withholding
s112 Right to suspend works for non-payment
s113 ‘Pay when Paid’ became ineffective
LDEDCA Part 8 Construction Contracts
The LDEDCA contains the construction provisions to
amend Part 2 of the HGCRA 1996 ('the Construction
Act').
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
These will seek to improve the existing legislation by
improving:
• cash flow and
• access to adjudication for construction companies
SECTION 107
CONTRACTS IN
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
CONTRACTS IN
WRITING
HGCRA Contracts in Writing provisions
107(2) Contracts are in considered to be in writing if
a) whether signed or not
b) exchange of communications
c) evidenced in writing
107(3) Terms – by reference
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
107(3) Terms – by reference
107(4) Terms recorded by a third person
107(5) Exchange in Adjudication/Arbitration – ‘Doctrine
of Election’
HGCRA – s.107 contracts in writing problems
• The provisions only apply to contracts evidenced
in writing.
• Not all contracts are evidenced in writing
- by design or by circumstance
• Only contracts in writing can be adjudicated
• Consequently parties prevented from using
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
• Consequently parties prevented from using
adjudication to enforce payment
RJT Consulting v DM Engineering - “What has to be
evidenced in writing is literally, the agreement, which
means all of it, not part of it”.
HGCRA – s.107 problems LDEDCA - solution
• only applies to contracts
evidenced in writing
• Not all contracts are
evidenced in writing –
by design or circumstance
• parties prevented from
• s107 repealed in full
• Contracts will no longer
required to be evidenced
in writing – may be;
1. Wholly in writing
2. Part writing, part oral
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
• parties prevented from
using adjudication to
enforce payment
2. Part writing, part oral
3. Wholly oral
LDEDCA – s.107 solution Potential issues/benefits
• s107 repealed in full
• Contracts will no longer
required to be evidenced
in writing – may be;
1. Wholly in writing
2. Part writing, part oral
• Widens scope of
adjudication to include
oral contracts
• Oral agreements will rely
on oral evidence / witness
statements.
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
2. Part writing, part oral
3. Wholly oral
statements.
• Potentially another
adjudication stage
introduced
• Cross examination
potentially required
SECTION 108
ADJUDICATION
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
ADJUDICATION
PROVISIONS
HGCRA Provisions
108(1) Right to refer disputes to Adjudication
108(2) The contract shall provide:
(a) Right to refer a dispute at anytime
(b) 7 day timetable for the appointment of Adjudicator
(c) 28 days for Adjudicator to decide (longer if agreed)
(d) 14 day extension if agreed to by referring party
(e) Adjudicator to act impartially
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
(e) Adjudicator to act impartially
(f) Adjudicator to take initiative in ascertaining Facts &
Law
108(3) Decision binding on the parties until Arbitration /
litigation
108(4) Adjudicator not liable
108(5) Scheme is the default provision for non-compliance
Adjudication Timetable – No change
• Day 1
• Before Day 7
• Day 7
• Days 8 – 34
• Notice of Adjudication
• Appointment of adjudicator
• Referral Notice
• Response to the Referral, Reply to
Response and any other submissions
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
• Day 35
Response and any other submissions
• Adjudicator’s decision issued
• +14 days at consent of referring party
• +?? days at consent of both parties
LDEDCA Amendments to Adjudication
Three changes to the HGCRA regime:
• Section 107 repealed – contracts in writing
• New S108(3A) – Slip rule
• New Section 108A (1) & (2) – allocation of
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
• New Section 108A (1) & (2) – allocation of
adjudicators costs
HGCRA – s.108 problems LDEDCA - solution
• Adjudicator clerical error in
his decision
• Reliant on parties arguing
on basis of common law
• New section 108(3A)
• Adjudicator’s power to
correct decision
•‘Slip Rule’
“The contract shall include
provision in writing permitting the
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
provision in writing permitting the
adjudicator to correct his decision
so as to remove a clerical or
typographical error arising by
accident or omission.”
HGCRA – s.108 adjudication problems
Clauses that require the referring party to pay:
• the other parties costs and/or
• the adjudicators costs
Irrespective of the decision of the adjudicator
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
Often referred to as Tolent Clauses
‘Tolent’ Clauses
Bridgeway Construction v Tolent Construction :
Notwithstanding Clause 15(a) either party may refer any dispute or
difference arising under or out of the contract to Adjudication in which each
party shall be responsible for their individual costs in referring or responding
to the Adjudication, however, should the Sub-Contractor refer a dispute to
Adjudication which is later rejected in whole or in part by the Adjudicator
then the Sub-Contractor shall meet all the costs of the Adjudication
including all costs sustained by the Company in responding to the claim.
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
including all costs sustained by the Company in responding to the claim.
The decision of the Adjudicator shall be binding on both parties until a final
decision is reached by Arbitration or until the parties agree that the decision
of the Adjudicator is final regarding the dispute or difference.
Judge held – There should be no interference with the Contract. The mere
fact that Bridgeway were disgruntled did not entitle Judge Mackay to say
"Well these clauses are a bit unfair. Let's change them".
However this was changed by the case of:
Yuanda (UK) Co Ltd vs. WW Gear Construction Ltd
“If the effect of the contract drafting is to "clearly discourage a party
from exercising its right to refer disputes to adjudication", then it must
be for consideration whether a provision so drafted is contrary to the
requirements of HGCRA”
“For these reasons, I consider that clause 9A would in practice limit
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
“For these reasons, I consider that clause 9A would in practice limit
Yuanda's freedom to refer a dispute to adjudication at any time and, in
some circumstances – such as in a dispute involving a relatively small
amount of money – to deprive it of a remedy altogether. I must
therefore respectfully disagree with the conclusion… in the Tolent case,
at least on the basis of the wording of clause 9A in this particular
contract”
HGCRA – s.108 problems LDEDCA - solution
• Tolent clauses
• Payment of other party’s
costs
• Often irrespective of
outcome
• New section 108A (1) & (2)
• Intention to only allow the
Adjudicator to allocate his
costs, or
• Parties to agree cost
allocation after the notice
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
allocation after the notice
of adjudication issued
LDEDCA – s.108 solution Potential issues/benefits
• New section 108A (1) & (2)
• Intention to only allow the
Adjudicator to allocate his
costs, or
• Parties to agree cost
allocation after the notice
• Aim is to remove
remaining barriers to
adjudication
• LDEDCA drafting not
‘water tight’
• Expect some cases to test
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
allocation after the notice
of adjudication issued
• Expect some cases to test
the new legislation
• Expected that Yuanda will
prevail in the end
LDEDCA Section 108 (A)
Adjudication costs: effectiveness of provision
(1) This section applies in relation to any contractual provision made
between the parties to a construction contract which concerns the
allocation as between those parties of costs relating to the
adjudication of a dispute arising under the construction contract.
(2) The contractual provision referred to in subsection (1) is
ineffective unless—
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
ineffective unless—
(a) it is made in writing, is contained in the construction contract and
confers power on the adjudicator to allocate his fees and expenses as
between the parties, or
(b) it is made in writing after the giving of notice of intention to refer
the dispute to adjudication.
LDEDCA Section 108 (A)
Does it work?
“Either party may refer any dispute or difference arising under or out
of the contract to Adjudication in which each party shall be
responsible for their individual costs in referring or responding to the
Adjudication, however, should the Sub-Contractor refer a dispute to
Adjudication which is later rejected in whole or in part by the
Adjudicator then the Sub-Contractor shall meet all the representation
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
Adjudicator then the Sub-Contractor shall meet all the representation
costs legal or otherwise of the Contractor in responding to the claim.
The Adjudicator shall have the power to apportion his reasonable fees
and expenses between the Parties at his discretion. The decision of
the Adjudicator shall be binding on both parties until a final decision
is reached by Arbitration or until the parties agree that the decision
of the Adjudicator is final regarding the dispute or difference”.
SECTION 110
PAYMENT PROVISIONS
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
PAYMENT PROVISIONS
Notice of intended suspension if a notice to withhold payment not givenPeriod as statedAssessment IntervalDue Due Due Due DateDateDateDate
S.110 S.110 S.110 S.110 Payment NoticePayment NoticePayment NoticePayment Notice Final Date Final Date Final Date Final Date
for Paymentfor Paymentfor Paymentfor Payment
e.g. 30 days minimum 7 daysApplication Application Application Application for paymentfor paymentfor paymentfor payment Date by which “Notice of payment to be made” (5 days max) Employer pays on or before
Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend performanceperformanceperformanceperformance(until payment made)Performance may be suspended if payment in full has not been made
S.111 S.111 S.111 S.111 Withholding NoticeWithholding NoticeWithholding NoticeWithholding Notice
Suspension period
HGCRA 1996: S110 Payments Overview
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
7 daysS111(3) (Y2.3) minimum 7 days“Notice to withhold payment” given not latetrthan Employer paysSuspension period
Key
Time period fixed by Construction Act
Time period defined in contract or by
Scheme/Act in default
HGCRA – s.S110 Payment Problems
1. Payment Notice - may only be given by employer
2. Sanction for failing to provide notice - none
3. Absence of notice – unclear what payment is due
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
HGCRA – s.110 problems LDEDCA - solution
1. Payment Notice –
only given by employer
2. Sanction for failing to provide
notice - none
3. Absence of notice – what
payment is due?
1. Notice of Payment may be issued
by Payer or by a specified person
- S110A (1a)
2. If after 5 days no Notice of
Payment is issued, Payee may
issue a Notice in Default stating
what is due - S110B (2).
3. If an application has been made
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
3. If an application has been made
in accordance with the Contract,
the application is considered the
payee’s ‘Notice in Default’- S110B
(4).
4. The amount contained in the
Notice in Default may be
considered as the amount DUE.
Notice of intended suspension if a notice to withhold payment not givenPeriod as statedAssessment IntervalDue Due Due Due DateDateDateDate
S.110 S.110 S.110 S.110 NoticeNoticeNoticeNotice
Final Date Final Date Final Date Final Date for Paymentfor Paymentfor Paymentfor Payment
e.g. 30 days or 30+ days ‘Payee Notice in ‘Default’ minimum 7 daysApplication Application Application Application for paymentfor paymentfor paymentfor payment Date by which “Notice of payment to be made” (5 days max) Employer pays on or before
Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend performanceperformanceperformanceperformance(until payment made)Performance may be suspended if payment in full has not been made
S.111 S.111 S.111 S.111 NoticeNoticeNoticeNotice
Suspension period
LDEDCA 2009: S110 Payments Overview
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
7 daysS111(3) (Y2.3) minimum 7 days“Notice of intention to pay less payment”not later thanS110(B) On failure to give Notice Payee application may become ‘Payee Notice in Default’ or Payee may issue NID (5+ days)
Employer paysSuspension periodImportantly Loss and Expense is now recoverable for period in pursuance/consequence of suspension
Key
Time period fixed by Construction Act
Time period defined in contract or by
Scheme/Act in default
LDEDCA – s.110 solution Potential issues/benefits
1. May be issued by Payer or by a
representative - S110A (1a)
2. If no Notice after 5 days Payee
may issue a Notice stating what
is due - S110B (2).
2. Application may be considered
the payee’s ‘Notice in Default’
• What is due to be paid is
certain
• Main contractors likely to be
busy at certification periods
• 2 bites of the cherry means
that MC may allow payments
to go through ‘self-cert’ process
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
the payee’s ‘Notice in Default’
- S110B (4).
3. The amount contained in the
Notice in Default may be
considered as the amount DUE.
to go through ‘self-cert’ process
and correct using 2nd S111
notice provision
• Still may have uncertainty until
late in the process
SECTION 111
WITHHOLDING
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
WITHHOLDING
PAYMENT
HGCRA – s.111 Withholding Payment problems
1. Confusion as to number of Notices to be issued.
2. Failing to issue a S111 notice still allows Payer to
defend to a claim via abatement defence
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
HGCRA – s.111 problems LDEDCA - solution
1. Confusion as to number of
Notices to be issued.
2. Abatement defence
1. Clarity – requirement to pay the
‘notified sum’ in s.110A notice
2. Payer may amend ‘notified sum’
via a ‘notice of intention to pay
less‘ - s.111(3)
3. No abatement defence as
obligation to pay the ‘notified
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
obligation to pay the ‘notified
sum’
LDEDCA – s.111 solution Potential issues/benefits
1. Clarity – requirement to pay
the ‘notified sum’ in s.110A
notice
2. Payer may amend ‘notified
sum’ via a ‘notice of intention
to pay less‘ - s.111(3)
3. No abatement defence as
• 2 bites of the cherry means
that MC may allow payments
to go through ‘self-cert’ process
and correct using 2nd notice
provision
• Uncertainty until late into the
payment cycle
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
3. No abatement defence as
obligation to pay the ‘notified
sum’
payment cycle
SECTION 112
RIGHT TO SUSPEND
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
RIGHT TO SUSPEND
PERFORMANCE
HGCRA – s.112 Suspension problems
1. Extension of time for suspension period only
2. No right to loss and/or expense
3. Must suspend all obligations
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
HGCRA – s.112 problems LDEDCA - solution
1. Extension of time for
suspension period only
2. No right to loss and/or
expense
3. Must suspend all obligations
1. Right to suspend ‘any or all of’
his obligations – s112(1)
2. Right to recover ‘reasonable
costs and expenses’ - s112(3A).
3. Right to claim an extension of
time for any period “in
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
time for any period “in
pursuance of or in consequence
of“ the right to suspend
S112(4).
SECTION 113
PAY WHEN PAID
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
PAY WHEN PAID
HGCRA – s.113(1) ‘Pay when Paid’ problems
1. The introduction of ‘Pay when Certified’ clauses.
2. Sub-Contractors not privy to certification process,
therefore:
• did not know when due, and
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
• did not know when due, and
• could not enforce payment
HGCRA – s.113 problems LDEDCA - solution
1. Pay when certified
2. Not notified of certification
dates
• s113 unchanged
• Amendment s110(1A)
• Payment may not be conditional
on:
• Performance of obligations
under another contract, or
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
under another contract, or
• Decision as to whether
obligations under another
contract have been
performed
• Does not apply to ‘management’
type contracts – s110(1C)
SECTION 113
PAYMENT ON INSOLVENCY
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
PAYMENT ON INSOLVENCY
HGCRA – s.113 payment on insolvency problems
1. Unclear in cases of payee insolvency whether
payment is to be made in absence of s111
withholding notice
Amendment confirms House of Lords decision in…
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
Amendment confirms House of Lords decision in…
Melville Dundas (in receivership) v George Wimpey UK
HGCRA – s.113 problems LDEDCA - solution
1. Payment on Payee
insolvency
• S111(10) Payer not obliged to pay
notified sum if:
• The Contract stipulates non-
payment in the event of
Payee insolvency, and
• Payee has become insolvent
after the prescribed period in
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
after the prescribed period in
section 111(5)(a) - date of
notice of intention to pay less
In summary
Key Changes
1. Adjudication costs
2. Slip Rule
3. Payment notices
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
3. Payment notices
4. Insolvency
What now?
• The new Act came into effect 1st October 2011
• Applies only to contracts entered into after
this date – contracts before this date subject
to old HGCRA
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
• May lead to confusion/litigation
• Amended suite of Contracts for JCT and NEC
Hill International (UK) Ltd
6160 Knights Court
Solihull Parkway
Birmingham Business Park
Birmingham
B37 7WY
Tel: 0121 717 5770
The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™The Global Leader in Managing Construction Risk ™
Tel: 0121 717 5770
Craig J Enderbury BSc DipArb MACostE FCIArb
Director