32
Communicating Approaches Chap 3 Key Ideas •Formal and Informal communication •Coordination of people and groups Organization Models Organizational Communication 1 Copyright Cengage © 2011

Chap 3 Approaches

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

yes

Citation preview

Page 1: Chap 3 Approaches

Communicating Approaches

Chap

3Key Ideas

•Formal and Informal communication•Coordination of people and groupsOrganization Models

Organizational Communication

1Copyright Cengage © 2011

Page 2: Chap 3 Approaches

Consider this . . . Consider this . . .

It is structure that enables It is structure that enables people to work together, and in so people to work together, and in so doing to accomplish things doing to accomplish things beyond the abilities of beyond the abilities of unorganized individuals.unorganized individuals.

Wagner & Hollenbeck, Organizational Behavior, Southwestern, 2004

2Copyright Cengage © 2011

Page 3: Chap 3 Approaches

Read or describe the case studyAnswer the following questions:

What type of informal/formal communication was used at Enron?

Which organizational model was used?What role did rank and yank play in

Enron’s unethical practices?

Copyright Cengage © 2011 3

The Rise and Fall of EnronThe Rise and Fall of Enron

Page 4: Chap 3 Approaches

Formal CommunicationFormal CommunicationIncludes 3 types of communication Inside the organization. . .Includes 3 types of communication Inside the organization. . .

Downward UpwardHorizontal

Messages flow laterallylaterally between people of the same rank.

Messages flow upwardupward through the chain of command—i.e., from employee to boss.

Messages flow downwarddownward through the chain of command—i.e., from manager to employee.

4Copyright Cengage © 2011

Page 5: Chap 3 Approaches

Downward CommunicationDownward Communication

Employee performance appraisals Job instructions Job rationale Policy & procedures Motivational appeals

Copyright Cengage © 2011 5

Page 6: Chap 3 Approaches

Upward CommunicationUpward Communication

Employee work, achievements & progress

Employee opinions & feelings Outlines of work problems Ideas for improvement

Copyright Cengage © 2011 6

Page 7: Chap 3 Approaches

Informal CommunicationInformal Communication This is commonly known as The

Grapevine Indicates the health of the organization Adds to employee satisfaction &

commitment Indicates employee concerns >

Copyright Cengage © 2011 7

Page 8: Chap 3 Approaches

Informal CommunicationInformal Communication Is 75-95% accurate Travels fast Effective managers use The

Grapevine

Copyright Cengage © 2011 8

Page 9: Chap 3 Approaches

Informal CommunicationInformal CommunicationIndicates the health of the organization

Adds to employee satisfaction & commitment

Indicates employee concerns

Is 75-95% accurate

Travels fast

Information carried by the “Grapevine” . . Information carried by the “Grapevine” . . ..

Thom

as P

erde

w/Fo

cus G

roup

/Pict

ureQ

uest

9Copyright Cengage © 2011

Page 10: Chap 3 Approaches

Coordination of People and GroupsCoordination of People and GroupsMutual adjustment – horizontal

communication between peers who meet to make work decisions

Direct supervision – supervisors have the authority to organize and direct work

Standardization – specific written standards for tasks, output levels, skills and workplace norms

Copyright Cengage © 2011 10

Page 11: Chap 3 Approaches

Organization Models: Organization Models: Traditional (or Classical) ModelTraditional (or Classical) Model

Copyright Cengage © 2011 11

Scientific Bureaucratic

Standardized employee tasks Organization Structure

Example: Taylor’sExample: Taylor’s Best Best WayWay

•Scientific design of each task•Scientific selection of workers•Adequate training and rewards for productivity•Division of both labor and responsibilities

Example: Fayol’s Fayol’s Best WayBest Way

•Specific organizational structure•Clear division of labor•Formal chain of command

Page 12: Chap 3 Approaches

Fayol’s BridgeFayol’s Bridge

Copyright Cengage © 2011 12

AA

CCBB

GGFFEEDD

Fayol’s bridge:Fayol’s bridge:Bypasses chainBypasses chainOf commandOf command

Normal line of communication

X XXXXXXXXXX

Page 13: Chap 3 Approaches

Human Relations ModelHuman Relations Model

Copyright Cengage © 2011 13

MayoMayo

Page 14: Chap 3 Approaches

Human Relations ModelHuman Relations ModelPioneered by Elton Mayo and

colleagues between 1927 and 1932Based on conclusions of Hawthorne

plant studyWorkers in relaxed congenial work

groups with supportive supervisors are more productive

Peer relationships significantly influences productivity

Copyright Cengage © 2011 14

Page 15: Chap 3 Approaches

Human Resources ModelHuman Resources Model

QCQC Theory YTheory Y

McGregorMcGregor

TeamsTeams

15Copyright Cengage © 2011

Page 16: Chap 3 Approaches

Human Resources and Human Human Resources and Human Relation ModelsRelation Models

Human Relations• People wish to be liked and respected.• If there needs are met, employees will

produce for the organization.• Managers should convince workers that

they are valuable team members.• Managers should allow employee

participation in routine decision making.• Sharing information with employees will

increase their satisfaction, which will improve their morale and reduce resistance to authority, thus improving productivity.

Human Resources• Most people desire a sense of

accomplishment.• Most employees have untapped

resources and are capable of more than most jobs allow.

• Managers should tap and guide each employee’s hidden talents and creativity to harmonize with organizational goals.

• Managers should allow (and encourage employee participation in routine and important decision making situations

• Employee satisfaction is a by-product of improved performance

Copyright Cengage © 2011 16

Page 17: Chap 3 Approaches

McGregor’s Theory XMcGregor’s Theory X

Messages travel downward

Upward messages limited Fear & distrust of

management Decisions made by top

management

Copyright Cengage © 2011 17

Bureaucratic

Page 18: Chap 3 Approaches

McGregor’s Theory YMcGregor’s Theory YMessages travel up and down in the

organizationDecisions shared & based on input

from all levelsFeedback is encouraged in an

upward direction >

Copyright Cengage © 2011 18

Page 19: Chap 3 Approaches

McGregor’s Theory YMcGregor’s Theory YAtmosphere of confidence & trust

existsDownward messages satisfy needs of

employeesDecision making is based on

messages from all levels improving decision accuracy and quality

Copyright Cengage © 2011 19

Page 20: Chap 3 Approaches

Beliefs of Theory X and Y ManagersBeliefs of Theory X and Y ManagersTheory X (Traditional)

1. The average person has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid if possible.

2. Most people will not strive to achieve organizational objectives unless they are coerced, controlled, directed, and threatened with punishment

3. The average person prefers to be directed, whishes to avoid responsibility, has relatively little ambition, and wants security above all else.

Theory Y (Human Resources)1. The use of physical and mental energy in work

is as natural as play and rest.2. External control and threats are not only ways

to motivate workers to meet organizational objectives. A person who is committed to the objectives will exercise self-direction and self-control.

3. Commitment to objectives is a motivator and a function of rewards and achievement.

4. Under proper conditions, workers learn not only to accept but also to seek responsibility.

5. The capacity to exercise a relatively high degree of ingenuity and creativity is widely distributed in the population

6. The intellectual potentialities of most people are only partly utilized in modern organizations.

Copyright Cengage © 2011 20

Page 21: Chap 3 Approaches

Elements of Likert’s Four SystemsElements of Likert’s Four Systems Supportive relationships based

on trust Group decision making and

group supervision High performance goals Formal and informal

communication

Copyright Cengage © 2011 21

© Ja

son

Harri

s

Page 22: Chap 3 Approaches

Systems/Contingency ModelSystems/Contingency Model

Copyright Cengage © 2011 22

FiedlerFiedlerCultureCulture

Theory ZTheory Z

SituationSituation

One model doesOne model does not fit all not fit all

Page 23: Chap 3 Approaches

Systems TheorySystems TheoryConcerned with the organization as a

wholeAll types of communication and

feedback essentialOne person can affect the entire

organizationUsed to build and maintain corporate

cultureCopyright Cengage © 2011 23

Page 24: Chap 3 Approaches

Contingency TheoryContingency TheoryLeadership depends on three variables

Leader-follower relations (liked or not liked) Position of power (powerful or weak) Task structure (organized or not

organized)Task or traditional leadership best when

Manager well liked or is dislikedTasks well-defined or is poorly defined >

Copyright Cengage © 2011 24

Page 25: Chap 3 Approaches

Contingency TheoryContingency TheoryHuman Relations Orientation best

whenManager is moderately likedManager is somewhat powerfulTasks are moderately defined

Copyright Cengage © 2011 25

Page 26: Chap 3 Approaches

Path-Goal TheoryPath-Goal TheoryDeveloped by Robert House (1971)Identified factors of job performance

and satisfactionSatisfaction with jobUncertainty and difficulty of jobCommunication style of supervisor

Copyright Cengage © 2011 26

Page 27: Chap 3 Approaches

Transformational ModelTransformational Model

Copyright Cengage © 2011 27

Virtual Virtual MultiunitMultiunit

Page 28: Chap 3 Approaches

Communication Patterns:Communication Patterns:Traditional ModelTraditional Model

Rational, task-oriented, usually written

Social side less important Structured roles define expectations Expectations determined by position Mainly downward

Copyright Cengage © 2011 28

Page 29: Chap 3 Approaches

Communication Patterns:Communication Patterns:Human Relations ModelHuman Relations Model

Supportive, but mainly downward Employee needs treated with TLC Feedback from employees &

grapevine Communication skills used to

develop & maintain relationshipsCopyright Cengage © 2011 29

Page 30: Chap 3 Approaches

Communication Patterns:Communication Patterns:Human Resources ModelHuman Resources Model

Team oriented & participative Info & feedback flow freely up &

down Informal communication encouraged Communication skills needed at all

levels

Copyright Cengage © 2011 30

Page 31: Chap 3 Approaches

Communication Patterns:Communication Patterns:Systems/Contingency ModelSystems/Contingency Model

No single best way to communicate Communication influenced by

situation Communication flexibility valued Requires communication skills at all

levels

Copyright Cengage © 2011 31

Page 32: Chap 3 Approaches

Communication Patterns:Communication Patterns:Transformational ModelTransformational Model

Horizontal communication essential Upward & downward communication

used Awareness of frame-of-reference

differences Much communication electronic

Copyright Cengage © 2011 32