13
Chapter 13 Fiscal Policy

Chapter 13

  • Upload
    vita

  • View
    23

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chapter 13. Fiscal Policy. The Multiplier Formula (cont’d). Can use this formula to find the impact on real GDP of any given change in aggregate demand: . The Government Spending Multiplier. Used to determine the change in government spending needed to close a recessionary gap: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 13

Chapter 13

Fiscal Policy

Page 2: Chapter 13

A change in anycomponent of ADm Change in

Real GDP

The Multiplier Formula (cont’d)

• Can use this formula to find the impact on real GDP of any given change in aggregate demand:

Page 3: Chapter 13

Increase in Government Spending

Size of the Recessionary GapBasic Spending Multiplier

The Government Spending Multiplier

• Used to determine the change in government spending needed to close a recessionary gap:

• Example: Suppose the government wants to close a $0.5 trillion recessionary gap:

If the MPC = 0.9, the spending multiplier is 1 / (1–.09) = 10. Thus, the required increase in government spending is

$0.5 trillion / 10 = $0.05 trillion ($50 billion).

Page 4: Chapter 13

The Tax Multiplier Process

• The government could also chose to lower taxes to increase AD

• Tax cuts take longer to impact the economy. Personal tax cuts:

• Must first increase disposable income• Must be perceived as permanent

Business tax cuts:• Must improve the profit outlook for businesses• It takes time for investment to take place.

Page 5: Chapter 13

Tax Multiplier (m 1)

The Effect of Taxes on Household Consumption

• The impact of personal tax cuts is diluted because some of the additional disposable income is saved. Multiplier effect from a change in taxes < that

resulting from an equivalent change in government spending.

The multiplier must also reflect the inverse relation between taxes and changes in real GDP.

Page 6: Chapter 13

The Tax Multiplier Equation

• Shows much taxes must decrease in order to eliminate a given recessionary gap:

Decreasein taxes

Size of the Recessionary GapTax Multiplier

Where the Tax Multiplier = Basic Spending Multiplier 1

Page 7: Chapter 13

The Tax Multiplier Equation (cont’d)

• Example: Suppose the government plans to close a $0.5 trillion recessionary gap using a tax cut. Assume the MPC = 0.9. The basic spending multiplier is 1 / (1–0.9) = 10. The tax multiplier is 10 – 1 = 9. The required tax cut is $0.5T / 9 = $0.055T. Note that the required change in taxes is larger than the required change in government spending ($0.05T).

Page 8: Chapter 13

Can we do it? (number 5)

• Assuming an economy with full employment real GDP of $600 billion, and an actual real GDP of $500 billion, and a MPC = 0.9, answer the following questions. What type of gap exists in this economy? What is the size of that gap? To cure this gap using only changes in government

spending means that government spending must (increase, decrease) by $ ___ billion

To cure this gap using only changes in taxes means that taxes must (increase, decrease) by $ ___ billion

Page 9: Chapter 13

• Recessionary gap• $100 billion • Increase • Decrease

11.11$1

9.11

100

10$

9.11

100

Page 10: Chapter 13

Contractionary Fiscal Policy (cont’d)

• Use of decreased government spending and increased taxes to decrease both aggregate demand and real GDP.

Page 11: Chapter 13

Figure 13.2 Curing the Overheating Economy with Contractionary Fiscal Policy

Page 12: Chapter 13

Contractionary Fiscal Policy

• As a result of contractionary fiscal policy: AD decreases.

• If AD decreases by the “right amount”, the economy will move to the full employment level of output.

The price level decreases. The unemployment rate rises.

•Real GDP declines

Page 13: Chapter 13

Contractionary Fiscal Policy (cont’d)

• Example: Suppose the government wants to close a $0.5 trillion expansionary gap: If the MPC = 0.9, the spending multiplier is

1 / (1 – 0.9) = 10. Thus, the required decrease in government spending is:$0.5 trillion / 10 = $0.05 trillion ($50 billion).

The tax multiplier is 10 – 1 = 9, so the required tax increase is $0.5T / 9 = $0.055T.