34

Chapter 2: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

TWELFTH EDITION. Chapter 2: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Clarkson  Miller  Cross. BUSINESS LAW. TEXT AND CASES. Legal, Ethical, Global, and Corporate Environment. §1: The Judiciary’s Role In American Government. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution
Page 2: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Judicial Review was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803) where Chief Justice Marshall wrote:“It is emphatically the province and duty

of the judiciary to say what the law is….”

2

Page 3: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Jurisdiction: “Juris” (law) “diction” (to speak) is the power of a court to hear a dispute and to “speak the law” into a controversy and render a verdict that is legally binding on the parties to the dispute.

3

Page 4: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Persons: power of a court to compel the presence of the parties (including corporations) to a dispute to appear before the court and litigate.

4

Page 5: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

In Rem: power to decide issues relating to property, whether the property is real, personal, tangible, or intangible. A court generally has in rem jurisdiction

over any property situated within its geographical borders.

5

Page 6: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Long Arm Statutes: courts use long-arm statutes for non-resident parties based on “minimum contacts” with state. Means defendant had some connection with forum state.

6

Page 7: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Corporate Contacts: does business or advertises within state.

CASE 2.1 Southern Prestige Industries, Inc. Independence Plating Co. (2010). Did the New Jersey firm have minimum contacts with North Carolina?

7

Page 8: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

General and Limited Jurisdiction.Limitation on the types of cases a court

can hear, usually determined by federal or state statutes. Example: probate, bankruptcy, criminal.

Usually defined by statute. Can also be limited to amount in controversy (amount of monetary damages).

8

Page 9: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Courts of original jurisdiction is where the case started (trial).

Courts of appellate jurisdiction have the power to hear an appeal from another court.

9

Page 10: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

“Federal Question” cases: Rights or obligations of a party are

created or defined by some federal law. “Diversity of Citizenship” cases:

Parties are not from the same state, andThe amount in controversy is greater

than $75,000.

10

Page 11: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Exclusive: only one court (state or federal) has the power (jurisdiction) to hear the case.

Concurrent: more than one court can hear the case.

11

Page 12: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Courts use a “Sliding Scale” Standard to determine whether to exercise jurisdiction.

International Jurisdiction Issues.

No YesSubstantial Business

Interaction

Passive Website

Some Interaction

12

Page 13: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for the trial.

Generally, proper venue is whether the injury occurred.

13

Page 14: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

A party must have suffered a legal injury and have a sufficient “stake” in the controversy.

CASE 2.2 Oregon v. Legal Services Corp. (2009). Was there a “concrete” injury to the state?

14

Page 15: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Ct. Criminal Appeals

SupremeCourt

Court ofAppeals

District Court

County Court

Municipal Court

JusticeCourt

Texas Courts

U.S. SupremeCourt

Circuit Courts ofAppeals

U.S. DistrictCourt

Federal Courts

15

Page 16: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 16

Page 17: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

“Courts of record”-court reporters.Small Claims Courts are informal,

inferior courts with limited amounts in controversy (usually $5,000).

Opening and closing arguments. Juries are selected.

17

Page 18: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Evidence presented (witness testimony, physical objects, documents, and pictures.)

Witnesses are examined and cross-examined.

Verdicts and Judgments are rendered.

18

Page 19: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Review trial courts proceedings to determine whether the trial was according to the procedural and substantive rules of law.

Generally, appellate courts will consider questions of law, but not questions of fact.

19

Page 20: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use. 20

Page 21: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

The two most fundamental ways to have your case heard in a supreme court are:Appeals of Right.By Writ of Certiorari.

21

Page 22: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

www.supremecourt.gov

22

Page 23: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Trials are very expensive and sometimes take many months to resolve.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods are inexpensive, relatively quick and leave more control with the parties involved.

23

Page 24: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Unless court-ordered, there is no record which is an important factor in commercial litigation due to trade secrets.

Most common: negotiation, mediation, arbitration.

24

Page 25: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Informal, sometimes without attorneys, where differences are discussed with the goal of “meeting of the minds” in resolving the case.

Successful negotiation involves thorough preparation, from a position of strength.

25

Page 26: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Involves neutral 3rd party ‘mediator’. Mediator talks face-to-face with

parties (in different rooms) to determine “common ground.”Advantages: few rules, customize

process, parties control results (win-win).Disadvantages: mediator fees, no

sanctions or deadlines.26

Page 27: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Neutral 3rd party renders a legally-binding decision; usually an expert or well-respected government official.

27

Page 28: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Results may be unpredictable because arbitrators do not have to follow precedent or rules of procedure or evidence.

Arbitrators do not have to issue written opinions.

Generally, no discovery available.28

Page 29: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Case begins with a submission to an arbitrator. Next comes the hearing where parties present evidence and arguments. Finally, the arbitrator renders an award.

Courts are not involved in arbitration unless an arbitration clause in a contract needs enforcement.

29

Page 30: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Issue of Arbitrability: a party compels arbitration and a court resolves the issue of whether arbitration is required. CASE 2.3 NCR Corp. v. Korala Associates,

Ltd. (2008). Mandatory Employment Arbitration in

Employment: generally enforceable.

30

Page 31: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Early Neutral Case Evaluation. Mini-Trial. Summary Jury Trials.

31

Page 32: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Non-profit organizations:American Arbitration Association.Better Business Bureau.

32

Page 33: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Also called ODR. Uses the Internet to resolve

disputes. Still in its infancy but is gaining

momentum. See, e.g., Resolution Forum, Inc.,

Virtual Magistrate Project.33

Page 34: Chapter 2: Courts and  Alternative Dispute Resolution

© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

Forum Selection and Choice-of-Law clauses in contracts govern the transaction.

Arbitration clauses are generally incorporated into international contracts.

34