Upload
kaden-head
View
21
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 27. Risk Management and Hedging. Hedging Foreign Exchange Risk. US firm wants to protect against a decline in profit that would result from a decline in the pound Estimated profit loss of $200,000 if the pound declines by $.10 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-11 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Risk ManagementRisk Managementand Hedgingand Hedging
Chapter 27Chapter 27
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-22 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedging Foreign Exchange RiskHedging Foreign Exchange Risk
US firm wants to protect against a decline in profit that would result from a decline in the pound
Estimated profit loss of $200,000 if the pound declines by $.10
Short or sell pounds for future delivery to avoid the exposure
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-33 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedge Ratio for Foreign Exchange Hedge Ratio for Foreign Exchange ExampleExample
Hedge Ratio in pounds
$200,000 per $.10 change in the pound/dollar exchange rate
$.10 profit per pound delivered per $.10 in exchange rate
= 2,000,000 pounds to be delivered
Hedge Ratio in contacts
Each contract is for 62,500 pounds or $6,250 per a $.10 change
$200,000 / $6,250 = 32 contracts
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-44 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedging Systematic RiskHedging Systematic Risk
To protect against a decline in level stock prices, short the appropriate number of futures index contracts
Less costly and quicker to use the index contracts
Use the beta for the portfolio to determine the hedge ratio
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-55 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedging Systematic Risk: Hedging Systematic Risk: Text ExampleText Example
Portfolio Beta = .8 S&P 500 = 1,000
Decrease = 2.5% S&P falls to 975
Portfolio Value = $30 million
Project loss if market declines by 2.5% = (.8) (2.5) = 2%
2% of $30 million = $600,000
Each S&P500 index contract will change $6,250 for a 2.5% change in the index
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-66 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedge Ratio: Text ExampleHedge Ratio: Text Example
H =
=
Change in the portfolio value
Profit on one futures contract
$600,000
$6,250= 96 contracts short
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-77 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Uses of Interest Rate HedgesUses of Interest Rate Hedges
Owners of fixed-income portfolios protecting against a rise in rates
Corporations planning to issue debt securities protecting against a rise in rates
Investor hedging against a decline in rates for a planned future investment
Exposure for a fixed-income portfolio is proportional to modified duration
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-88 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedging Interest Rate Risk: Hedging Interest Rate Risk: Text ExampleText Example
Portfolio value = $10 million
Modified duration = 9 years
If rates rise by 10 basis points (.1%)
Change in value = ( 9 ) ( .1%) = .9% or $90,000
Present value of a basis point (PVBP) = $90,000 / 10 = $9,000
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-99 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedge Ratio: Text ExampleHedge Ratio: Text Example
H =
=
PVBP for the portfolio
PVBP for the hedge vehicle
$9,000
$90= 100 contracts
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-1010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedging On Mispriced OptionsHedging On Mispriced Options
Option value is positively related to volatility If an investor believes that the implied
volatility that is implied in an option’s price is too low, a profitable trade is possible
Profit must be hedged against a decline in the value of the stock
Performance depends on option price relative to the implied volatility
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-1111 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedging and DeltaHedging and Delta
The appropriate hedge will depend on the delta
Recall from Chapter 21 the delta is the change in the value of the option relative to the change in the value of the stock
Delta = Change in the value of the option
Change of the value of the stock
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-1212 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Mispriced Option: Text ExampleMispriced Option: Text Example
Implied volatility = 33%
Investor believes volatility should = 35%
Option maturity = 60 days
Put price P = $4.495
Exercise price and stock price = $90
Risk-free rate r = 4%
Delta = -.453
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-1313 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedged Put PortfolioHedged Put Portfolio
Cost to establish the hedged position
1000 put options at $4.495 / option $ 4,495
453 shares at $90 / share 40,770
Total outlay 45,265
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-1414 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Profit Position on Profit Position on Hedged Put PortfolioHedged Put Portfolio
Value of put option as function of stock price: implied vol. = 35%Stock Price 89 90 91
Put Price $5.254 $4.785 $4.347
Profit (loss) for each put .759 .290 (.148)
Value of and profit on hedged portfolio
Stock Price 89 90 91
Value of 1,000 puts $ 5,254 $ 4,785 $ 4,347
Value of 453 shares 40,317 40,770 41,223
Total 45,571 45,555 45,570
Profit 306 290 305
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27-27-1515 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999
INVESTMENTSFourth Edition
Bodie Kane Marcus
Hedging Demands on Hedging Demands on Capital Market EquilibriumCapital Market Equilibrium
CAPM assume that investors face only risk about the uncertain value of securities
Many additional elements of risk are present
- Uncertain prices on consumption, energy or housing
- Uncertain future interest rates Hedging activity associated with these elements of
risk are consistent with the multifactor arbitrage pricing model