Upload
trevor-arron-campbell
View
236
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chapter 4Chapter 4Corporate Corporate
Governance: Governance: Foundational Foundational
IssuesIssues
© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning 1
Corporate Governance
Corporate governance
•Refers to the method by which a firm is being governed, directed, administered, or controlled and to the goals for which it is being governed.
Is concerned with the relative roles, rights, and accountability of such stakeholder groups as owners, boards of directors, managers, employees, and other stakeholders.
© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning2
The Corporation’s Hierarchy of Authority
3© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
State Charter
Shareholders
Board of Directors
Management
Employees
The Need for Board Independence
4© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
•Outside directors – independent from the firm
•Inside directors – have some tie to the firm
Board independence is crucial to good governance
Issues Surrounding Compensation
5© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Issues Surrounding Compensation (continued)
6© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
1) Shareholder push to link pay to performance
1) Shareholder push to link pay to performance
2) Increasing use of “clawback” provisions where executives must return pay under some
conditions
2) Increasing use of “clawback” provisions where executives must return pay under some
conditions
CEO PayControversy
CEO Pay/ Firm Performance Relationship
Stock Options•Allows the recipient to purchase stock in the future at the price it is today.
Backdating•Allows the recipient to purchase stock at yesterday’s price, resulting in immediate wealth increase.
Spring-Loading•Granting of a stock option at today’s price, but with the inside knowledge that stock’s value is improving.
Bullet Dodging•Delaying of a stock option grant until right after bad news.
7© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Excessive CEO Pay
Ratio of CEO pay to average worker is 319 to 1 (down from 531 to 1 in 2000).
Say on Pay • Evolved from concerns over excessive
executive compensation.• Began in the United Kingdom in 2002 with
regulations on pay.
Clawback provisions• Compensation recovery mechanisms that
enable a company to recoup compensation funds, typically in the event of a financial restatement or executive’s misbehavior.
8© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Executive Retirement Plans and Exit Packages
Retirement packages have come under scrutiny.• Robert Nardelli received $210 million
when he was ousted from Home Depot by shareholders.
• Contrast to most workers, many of whom to do have a retirement plan.
9© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Outside Director Compensation
• Paying board members is a recent concept.
• Controversy over whether directors should be paid at all, and whether they are paid enough.
10© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Insider Trading
The practice of obtaining criticalinformation from inside a company and
using that information for one’s ownpersonal financial gain.
11© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Improving Corporate Governance: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX)
• Limits the nonauditing services an auditor can provide
• Requires auditing firms to rotate the auditors working with a specific company
• Makes it unlawful for accounting firms to provide services where conflicts of interests exist
• CEOs and CFOs certify and are held responsible for financial representations
12© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Improving Corporate Governance: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX)
(continued)
• Enhances financial disclosure with requirements, such as:• Reporting off-balance sheet transactions• Prohibiting personal loans to executives
and directors• Requiring auditors to assess and report
upon internal controls • Audit committees must have at least one
financial expert• Whistle-blowers are given protection• Code of ethics disclosure
13© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Improving Corporate Governance
Changes in boards of directors
• Board diversity
• Outside board directors
•Use of board committees for:
• Audit
• Nominating
• Compensation
• Public policy
The board should “get tough” with the CEO.
14© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Ranking of Red Flags Signaling Board Problems
15© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Steps to Take for Board Repair
16© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Board Diversity
Board diversity is lacking•Only around 15% of directors in U.S. are women.
•Sixty-six Fortune 500 firms have no female board members.
•Hispanics, Asian Americans and African Americans also under-represented.
•Diverse boards are also less likely to fall prey to groupthink because they have a range of perspectives.Is a global problem.
17© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Use of Board Committees
Principle Responsibilities of an Audit Committee
1.To ensure that published financial statements are not misleading.
2.To ensure that internal controls are adequate.
3.To follow up on allegations of material, financial, ethical, and legal irregularities.
4.To ratify the selection of the external auditor.
18© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Other Board Committees
Nominating committee•Is composed of outside directors.•Has the responsibility of selecting competent, objective board members.Compensation committee•Evaluates executive performance and recommending terms and conditions of employment.Public issues committee (Public policy committee)•Responds to public or social issues.•Deals with areas in which public or ethical issues are present.
19© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Board Member Liability
Business judgment rule•Holds that courts should not challenge board members who act in good faith,making informed decisions that reflectthe company’s best interests.
Board members need to be free to take risks without fear of liability.
20© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Board Member Liability (continued)
The “Caremark Standard,” which heightened concerns over personal liability, states that directors can be held personally liable if:
1.The director utterly failed to implement any reporting or information system or controls, or
2.Having implemented such a system or controls, consciously failed to monitor or oversee its operations, disabling their ability to be informed of risks or problems requiring their attention.
21© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
The Role of the SEC
• Is responsible for protecting investor interests.
• Critics argue that the SEC is more focused on businesses than on investors.
SEC failed to catch the Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme before losing investors billions.
22© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Investor Relations
Full disclosure (Transparency)•Information filed at regular and frequent intervals that contains information that might affect investment decisions.
Management is responsible for communicating with shareholders.
23© 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning