26
Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5The Relational Model and

Normalization

David M. Kroenke

Database Processing

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 2: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

The Relational Model

• Broad, flexible model• Basis for almost all DBMS products• E.F. Codd defined well-structured

“normal forms” of relations, “normalization”

Page 113

Page 3: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Relation

• Two-dimensional table• Rows are tuples• Columns are attributes

Page 113

Page 4: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Equivalent Relational Terms

Page 114Figure 5-1 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 5: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Functional Dependency“relationship between or among

attributes”

Page 114Figure 5-2 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 6: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Functional Dependency Notation

SID MajorComputerSerialNumber

MemorySize

(SID, ClassName) Grade

Page 115

Page 7: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Key“a group of one or more attributes

that uniquely identifies a row”

Page 116Figure 5-3 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 8: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Combination Key

Page 117Figure 5-4 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 9: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Normalization

“the process of evaluating and converting a relation to reduce modification anomalies”

Page 118

Page 10: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Anomaly

“an undesirable consequence of data modification in which two or more different themes are entered (insertion anomaly) in a single row or two or more themes are lost if the row is deleted (deletion anomaly)”

Page 118

Page 11: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Normal Forms

“classes of relations and techniques for preventing anomalies”

DK/NF = Domain Key Normal Form(free of modification anomalies)

Page 118

Page 12: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

First Normal Form“any table of data that meets the

definition of a relation”

Figure 5-3 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 13: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Second Normal Form“when all of a relation’s nonkey attributes

are dependent on all of the key”

Figure 5-5 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 14: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Third Normal Form“if it is in second normal form and

has no transitive dependencies”

Figure 5-7 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 15: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Boyce-Codd Normal Form

“if every determinant is a candidate key”

Figure 5-8 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 16: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Fourth Normal Form“if in BCNF and has no multi-value

dependencies”

Figure 5-11 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 17: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Fifth Normal Form

? Page 125

Page 18: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Domain Key Normal Form

“if every constraint on the relation is a logical consequence of the definition of keys and domains”

Page 125

Page 19: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

DK/NF Terms

• Constraint “a rule governing static values of attributes”

• Key “unique identifier of a tuple”• Domain “description of an

attribute’s allowed values”

Page 126

Page 20: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

DK/NF Example

Figure 5-13 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 21: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

DK/NF Example

Figure 5-15 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 22: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

DK/NF Example

Figure 5-16 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 23: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Summary of Normal Forms

Figure 5-18 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 24: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

A B relationships

A B and B A one-to-oneA B but B not A many-to-oneA not B and B not A many-to-many

Page 131

Page 25: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Summary of Relationships

Figure 5-19 © 2000 Prentice Hall

Page 26: Chapter 5 The Relational Model and Normalization David M. Kroenke Database Processing © 2000 Prentice Hall

Chapter 5

© 2000 Prentice Hall

Optimization

• De-Normalization• Controlled Redundancy

Page 135