25
140 Chapter 6 Stress Removal and In Vitro Wound Healing Activity of Peptides C2 and E1 6.1 INTRODUCTION ROS are required by living systems to maintain a number of functions including signal transduction, cell adhesion and wound healing (Park et al 2011). When the delicate balance between the ROS creation and depletion is hampered due to excess ROS or faulty detoxification mechanism, oxidative stress ensues. Excess ROS acts through multiple mechanisms to cause stress: oxidizes cellular macromolecules leading to membrane damage, enzyme dysfunction and metabolic flux hamper and impaired DNA repair, resulting in mutagenesis or cell death (Lum and Roebuck, 2001). During wound repair, reactive radicals created by neutrophils in the second phase of wound healing serves as signals for other group of cells to initiate steps for the third and fourth phase of wound healing. However, in case of persistent wounds or the presence of foreign elements near a wound site, the resultant uncontrolled stress, ROS or otherwise, can lead to deleterious effects. Although very low levels of free radicals can actually increase the integrin attachment to ECM, the effect is reversed at higher levels. Excess ROS displays a multitude of effects including altered integrin sub-unit gene expression, consequently leading to improper connectivity with the ECM and eventually, cell death (Lamari et al 2007; Mian et al 2008). Oxidative stress also results in reorganization of actin filaments through FAK, resulting in loss of cell-matrix adhesiveness. This may eventually lead to cell loss, compromised tissue integrity, activation of apoptotic pathways and pathologic consequences (Zhou et al 1999). It is hypothesized that this cell loss in the presence of ROS stress can be countered by an efficient cell adhesion. Thus, components of the matrix with an increased cell adhesive ability could provide some form of protection to stress-exposed cells. The increased cell survival, in turn can also have a substantial effect on cell movement during in vivo stress-generating events like tissue remodelling and wound closure. The physiological effects of oxidative stress in vitro can be mimicked by the use of exogenously administered H 2 O 2 and by heavy metals. ROS stress can be generated by metals through two distinct mechanisms: With redox-active metals like Fe and Cr, a

Chapter 6 Stress Removal and In Vitro Wound Healing ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/37737/15/15_chapter 6.pdf · Stress Removal and In Vitro Wound Healing Activity of

  • Upload
    donhu

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

140

Chapter 6

Stress Removal and In Vitro Wound Healing Activity of

Peptides C2 and E1

6.1 INTRODUCTION

ROS are required by living systems to maintain a number of functions including

signal transduction, cell adhesion and wound healing (Park et al 2011). When the delicate

balance between the ROS creation and depletion is hampered due to excess ROS or faulty

detoxification mechanism, oxidative stress ensues. Excess ROS acts through multiple

mechanisms to cause stress: oxidizes cellular macromolecules leading to membrane

damage, enzyme dysfunction and metabolic flux hamper and impaired DNA repair,

resulting in mutagenesis or cell death (Lum and Roebuck, 2001).

During wound repair, reactive radicals created by neutrophils in the second phase

of wound healing serves as signals for other group of cells to initiate steps for the third

and fourth phase of wound healing. However, in case of persistent wounds or the

presence of foreign elements near a wound site, the resultant uncontrolled stress, ROS or

otherwise, can lead to deleterious effects. Although very low levels of free radicals can

actually increase the integrin attachment to ECM, the effect is reversed at higher levels.

Excess ROS displays a multitude of effects including altered integrin sub-unit gene

expression, consequently leading to improper connectivity with the ECM and eventually,

cell death (Lamari et al 2007; Mian et al 2008). Oxidative stress also results in

reorganization of actin filaments through FAK, resulting in loss of cell-matrix

adhesiveness. This may eventually lead to cell loss, compromised tissue integrity,

activation of apoptotic pathways and pathologic consequences (Zhou et al 1999).

It is hypothesized that this cell loss in the presence of ROS stress can be

countered by an efficient cell adhesion. Thus, components of the matrix with an increased

cell adhesive ability could provide some form of protection to stress-exposed cells. The

increased cell survival, in turn can also have a substantial effect on cell movement during

in vivo stress-generating events like tissue remodelling and wound closure.

The physiological effects of oxidative stress in vitro can be mimicked by the use

of exogenously administered H2O2 and by heavy metals. ROS stress can be generated by

metals through two distinct mechanisms: With redox-active metals like Fe and Cr, a

141

Fenton-like reaction produces free radicals while redox-inactive toxic metals such as Hg

and Cd act through depletion of major antioxidant components leading to unquenched

free radicals (Ercal et al 2001). For this study, oxidative stress has been created via three

systems; subjecting cells to H2O2, a combination of Fe/ H2O2 and through heavy metals.

Two cryptic peptides isolated earlier; E1 (Chapter 3 and 5) and C2 (Chapter 5),

both displaying cell adhesion abilities was used as possible „stress-relieving‟ agents. The

present study was carried out to determine the cyto-protective and de-stressor activity of

the these peptides in countering stress generated by ROS along with the ability to affect

in vitro wound healing properties.

6.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

T-flasks (Nunclon surface) were procured from Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark and

disposable culture dishes (35×10mm) were obtained from Fischer Scientific, Hanover

park, IL, USA. DMEM supplemented with 2mM glutamine and 10X antibiotic-

antimycotic solution were obtained from HiMedia, India. Foetal bovine serum and 10X

sterile filtered trypsin-EDTA solution was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Vero and HeLa

cell lines were procured from National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India. All bench

work associated with cell lines, including peptide coating have been carried out inside a

class II bio-safety cabinet (Clean Air Systems, Chennai, India) for maintaining sanitized

conditions.

6.2.1 PEPTIDE ISOLATION AND COATING

The peptides E1 and C2 were isolated as described in Chapter 3 and 5

respectively. The purified peptides were coated onto the disposable dishes according to

standard procedures described in Chapter 5. A coating density of 0.507nmole cm-2

area,

known to display maximal cell adhesion has been used throughout this study.

6.2.2 CELL MAINTENANCE

Vero and HeLa cell lines were maintained as mentioned in section 5.2.1.2,

Chapter 5. For experiments, cells reaching 80% confluence were detached from T-flasks

with trypsin-EDTA, centrifuged and cell number enumerated by Neuber‟s chamber. The

viability was tested by trypan blue exclusion assay.

142

6.2.3 HYDROXYL RADICAL SCAVENGING ASSAY

The hydroxide radical scavenging assay was performed according to Zhang et al

(2010). A known quantity of peptides C2 and E1 were dissolved in 20mM KH2PO4-KOH

buffer, pH 7.5 in various dilutions ranging from 0.1-100mM. To 0.1ml of each solution,

the following reagents were added in order; 0.1ml of 1mM EDTA, 10mM H2O2, 75mM

2-deoxy-D-ribose, 2mM ascorbic acid and 1mM FeCl3. The reaction mixture was

incubated for 1h at 37°C and stopped by addition of 0.25ml of 20% TCA. For colour

development, 1ml of 1% TBA was added and the tubes with the reaction mixture were

placed in a boiling water bath for 15min. Absorbance was measured at 532nm after

cooling to room temperature. For blank, water was used instead of FeCl3 in a similar

reaction mixture. BSA and bovine tendon collagen were used as „negative control‟.

Collagen hydrolysate obtained after proteolysis was used as „test control‟ and BHT was

used as the „positive control‟. Assays were done in triplicates. Scavenging ability was

calculated from the following equation:

Radical scavenging activity (%) = 1001

Control

Test

Test is the absorbance of the test peptide samples and Control is the absorbance without

the peptides.

6.2.4 DE-STRESSOR ACTIVITY OF THE PEPTIDES

Stress was generated by five different stress-creating agents as listed in Table 6.1.

Concentrations of the stressors used were chosen from previously reported toxicity levels

(Levis and Majone 1979; Houot et al 2001; Hultberg et al 2001; Jungas et al 2002). Metal

stock solutions were prepared in deionized water and sterilized by filtration through

0.2µm filter. At the time of treatment, stock solutions were diluted in pre-warmed culture

medium to the final concentration required. For agents 4 and 5, stock H2O2 was stored in

4°C and diluted in 0.2M sterilized PBS before adding to the medium.

143

Table 6.1 List of agents used as stressors (*- concentration given in µM).

Agent Stressor Range of final concentrations (mM)

1 Cr (VI) 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

2 Fe (II) 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

3 Hg (II) 0 1.5625* 3.125

* 12.5

* 25

* 50

*

4 H2O2 0 2.5 5 10 25 100

5 Fenton‟s

reagent

Fe (II) 0 0.1 5 10 50 100

H2O2 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 50

Table 6.2 Experimental set-up for in vitro wound healing studies for three conditions;

in the absence of a stressor, in the presence of stressor and in the presence of both stressor

and de-stressor.

Set I

C2 coated E1 coated Collagen coated Uncoated

Set II

C2 coated +

H2O2

E1 coated +

H2O2

Collagen coated

+ H2O2

Uncoated +

H2O2

Set III

C2 coated +

E1 dissolved +

H2O2

E1 coated +

E1 dissolved +

H2O2

Collagen coated

+ E1 dissolved +

H2O2

Uncoated +

E1 dissolved

+ H2O2

144

6.2.4.1 ASSAYING DE-STRESSOR ACTIVITY IN COATED FORM

3.5×106

cells were seeded onto the coated dishes followed immediately by

exposing them to stressor agents 1-5 as per the final concentration given in Table 6.1.

The total volume was kept constant at 1.5ml. Cells seeded onto CCS dishes without

exposure to any stress was used as the control cell count. After 6h incubation, the adhered

cells were trypsinized and counted by haemocytometry.

6.2.4.2 ASSAYING DE-STRESSOR ACTIVITY IN DISSOLVED FORM

3.5×106

cells suspended in DMEM were seeded on CCS dishes and subjected to

the same level of stress as in section 6.2.4.1. Based upon activity of E1 in section 3.3.3.2,

Chapter 3, 0.0815µmoles (0.2mg ml-1

) of the active peptides E1 and C2 were solubilized

separately in 0.5ml medium and added to the cells. Care was taken to adjust the added

amount of stressors and cells such that the final concentration and volume to be the same

as before. After 6h incubation, adherent cells were counted and stressor concentration

ensuing 50% cell survival was calculated.

6.2.5 WOUND CLOSURE ASSAY

The wound closure assay was performed according to the protocols given by

Liang et al (2007). 3.5×105cells were seeded onto C2 and E1 coated dishes. An equal

number of cells were seeded onto collagen coated (positive control) and uncoated dishes

(negative controls). When cells reached 90-95% confluence, two parallel scratch wounds

of approximately 400µm diameter were made with a pipette tip in all the dishes. The

medium was replenished for all the dishes with certain changes as given in Table 6.2.

10mM H2O2 was added in set I, 10mM H2O2 along with E1 in dissolved form at a

concentration of 0.0815µmole/ml (based upon activity of E1 in section 6.2.4.2) was

added in set II and set III was incubated „as is‟. Images of a fixed area of the wound were

taken at regular intervals over the course of 24h. Image analysis was done by ImageJ

software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) from the National Institute of Health, USA.

The wound-edge positions of the cells were averaged by digitally drawing lines. The area

of the wound was calculated as a rectangle, whose length was taken to be the length of

the wound in focus and breadth the average distance between the two advancing edges of

the wound. The decrease in this rectangular area with time was calculated by measuring

the decreasing distance between the advancing edges. Finally, the total was subtracted

145

from the original area to determine the area covered and expressed in % (Valster et al

2005).

6.2.6 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The assays were done in triplicates and activities reported as mean ± standard

deviation. Duplicate dishes were used for the wound healing migration assay. Larger

datasets were analyzed for statistical significance using one way and two-way ANOVA.

Comparison between two groups was accomplished by post-hoc Tukey‟s test and

student‟s t-test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

6.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

6.3.1 HYDROXYL RADICAL SCAVENGING ASSAY

E1 has already been confirmed in Chapter 3 as a moderately strong antioxidative

agent with radical scavenging, metal chelation and reductive ability. Since most ROS

stress generates •OH radicals, it was necessary to check for E1‟s ability to scavenge

•OH.

As displayed in Fig. 6.1, BHT, used as positive control, displayed highest activity

followed by E1 and the hydrolysate. The activities of BHT, the peptides and collagen

were significantly different (p<0.004) at a confidence level of 95% based on ANOVA. At

100nmole, E1 displayed a scavenging activity of 58.7%, whereas C2 achieved only 15%.

The activity of the hydrolysate was probably due to the numerous small constituent

charged peptides. However, it was lower than that of E1 (p<0.01) probably due to the

number of active sites being less when compared to that of E1. The results confirmed E1

to be a potent ROS stress releiver in the dissolved form with the ability to quench •OH.

146

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

BHT C2 E1 Hydro Coll

Samples

% s

caven

gin

g a

cti

vit

y 1 nmole

10 nmole

100 nmole

Fig. 6.1 Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of C2, E1 and the hydrolysate (Hydro).

BHT and collagen (Coll) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

6.3.2 DE-STRESSOR ACTIVITIES OF PEPTIDES

Stress is a condition in which the homeostasis maintained in living systems fail,

giving rise to diverse pathological and physiological consequences. The efficacy of the

peptides in relieving oxidative stress generated through H2O2 and heavy metals has been

studied in this chapter. The photographs depicting the effect of the peptides in countering

stress are displayed in Fig. 6.2 (countering heavy metal-generated stress) and Fig. 6.3

(countering H2O2 and Fe (II)/ H2O2 - generated stress). Cell count in the CCS dishes were

found to decrease with increasing stressor concentration (correlation = -0.8). Presence of

the peptides; both in coated and in dissolved form had a positive impact on cell adhesion

and survival (correlation=-0.4 to -0.6) as displayed in Fig. 6.4-6.7.

147

25µM25µM25µM1.5µM

10mM10mM10mM0.1mM

10mM10mM10mM0.1mM

Hg (II)

Fe (II)

Cr (VI)

CCS + E1 in

dissolved form

C2 coatedCCSCCS

25µM25µM25µM1.5µM

10mM10mM10mM0.1mM

10mM10mM10mM0.1mM

Hg (II)

Fe (II)

Cr (VI)

CCS + E1 in

dissolved form

C2 coatedCCSCCS

Fig. 6.2 Photomicrographs depicting cell adhesion under heavy metal-generated stress.

The bar in the bottom right photomicrograph represents a length of 0.1mm.

1mM / 10mM1mM / 10mM1mM / 10mM0.01mM / 0.1mM

10mM10mM10mM2.5mM

HP +

Fe (II)

HP

CCS + E1 in

dissolved form

C2 coatedCCSCCS

1mM / 10mM1mM / 10mM1mM / 10mM0.01mM / 0.1mM

10mM10mM10mM2.5mM

HP +

Fe (II)

HP

CCS + E1 in

dissolved form

C2 coatedCCSCCS

Fig. 6.3 Photomicrographs depicting cell adhesion under HP (hydrogen peroxide) and Fe

(II) + HP generated stress. The magnification is the same as before.

148

a.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0

Cr(VI) mM

HeL

a c

ell c

ou

nt×

10

5

C2 ct C2 dv E1 ct E1 dv CCS

b.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0Fe (II) mM

HeL

a c

ell c

ou

nt×

10

5

c.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

50 25 12.5 3.125 1.5625 0

Hg(II) µM

HeL

a C

ell c

ou

nt×

10

5

Fig. 6.4 Effect of increasing metal-generated stress on HeLa cells. Adhesion pattern of

cells in the presence of a. Cr (VI), b. Fe (II) and c. Hg (II). The term „ct‟ represents the

dishes with coated peptides while „dv‟ represents dishes with dissolved peptides.

149

a.

.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0

Cr(VI) mM

Vero

cell c

ou

nt×

10

5

C2 ct C2 dv E1 ct E1 dv CCS

b.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0

Fe(II) mM

Vero

cell c

ou

nt×

10

5

c.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

50 25 12.5 3.125 1.5625 0

Hg(II) µM

Vero

cell c

ou

nt×

10

5

Fig. 6.5 Effect of increasing metal-generated stress on Vero cells. Adhesion pattern of

cells in the presence of a. Cr (VI), b. Fe (II) and c. Hg (II).

150

a.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

100 25 10 5 2.5 0H2O2 mM

HeL

a c

ell c

ou

nt×

10

5

C2 ct C2 dv E1 ct E1 dv CCS

b.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

100 25 10 5 2.5 0H2O2 mM

Vero

cell c

ou

nt×

10

5

Fig. 6.6 Effect of H2O2-generated stress on a. HeLa and b. Vero cells.

151

a.

05

101520253035

100 50 10 5 0.1 0

50 10 1 0.1 0.01 0

Fe(II) and H2O2 mM

HeL

a c

ell c

ou

nt×

10

5C2 ct C2 dv E1 ct E1 dv CCS

b.

05

101520253035

100 50 10 5 0.1 0

50 10 1 0.1 0.01 0

Fe(II) and H2O2 mM

Vero

cell c

ou

nt×

10

5

Fig. 6.7 Effect of Fe (II)/ H2O2 generated stress on a. HeLa and b. Vero cells.

Table 6.3 Stressor concentrations corresponding to 50% cell adhesion for HeLa and Vero

cells.

Stressors

used

HeLa Vero

50% cell survival in the presence of

CCS C2 E1 CCS C2 E1

Coat Dis. Coat Dis. Coat Dis. Coat Dis.

At a stressor concentration (mM)

H2O2 0.4 6.2 0.4 2.5 7.6 3.6 12.3 4.7 7.3 39.6

H2O2

[+Fe(II)]

<0.1

0.8 <0.1 1 12.9 <0.1 3.2 0.1 1.2 14

Cr(VI) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 1 0.2 0.9 0.3 0.5 2

Fe(II) <0.1 0.5 <0.1 0.1 150 0.3 2.4 0.4 1.8 143.5

Hg(II)* 0.2 3.7 3 2.1 22.9 2 5.7 4.5 5.7 161.9

152

Table 6.4 Statistical post hoc analysis of relationships among the coated and the dissolved

forms of the two peptides for the five stressors.

E1 dis. E1 coated C2 dis. C2 coated CCS

Fe(II)/H2O2 and H2O2

E1 dis. - P<0.03a

P<0.01b

P<0.01 p>0.05

* P<0.01

E1 coated - P<0.03a

P=0.04b

P<0.04 P<0.02

C2 dis. - P<0.04a

P<0.02b

p>0.05*

C2 coated - P<0.002

Cr (VI)

E1 dis. - P<0.01a

P<0.02b

P<0.02a

P<0.03b

P<0.01a

P<0.04b

P<0.02

E1 coated - P<0.04a

p>0.05b*

P=0.05a, *

p>0.05b, *

P<0.03

C2 dis. - p>0.05 P<0.03

C2 coated - P<0.03a

p>0.05b, *

Fe (II)

E1 dis. - P<0.03 P<0.02 P<0.003a

P<0.04

P<0.01

E1 coated - P<0.05a

P<0.04b

P<0.04a

p>0.05b, *

P<0.03

C2 dis. - P<0.02 p>0.05*

C2 coated - P<0.03a

P<0.04b

Hg (II)

E1 dis. - P<0.03

P<0.02a

P<0.01b

P<0.03 P<0.01

E1 coated - P<0.04a

P=0.501b, *

P<0.03a

P<0.04b

P<0.02

C2 dis. - P>0.05* P<0.04

C2 coated - P<0.02a

P<0.01b

a- for HeLa cells,

b- for Vero cells, „dis.‟ stands for „in dissolved form‟ and

*- difference

not significant at 95% confidence level.

153

Table 6.3 lists the stressor concentrations in which 50% of the seeded cells

survived in presence of the peptides. Certain trends were clearly discernable. On an

average for both cell lines, C2-coated displayed cell survival at 10 times more stressor

concentration than CCS for redox-oriented stress and 5 times more for metal-oriented

stress. Similarly, E1-dissolved displayed cell survival at 70 times more stressor

concentration than CCS for redox-oriented stress, and 365 times more for metal-oriented

stress.

Combining the cell survival results and the statistical analysis given in Table 6.4,

some distinct patterns in peptide activity could be inferred, and they are listed below:

(i) The coated form of the peptides displayed a different activity pattern than

their dissolved form and activity depended on the stressor levels.

(ii) E1 in the coated form displayed higher cell survival for all stressor agents

when compared to CCS dishes, hinting that cryptic peptide coated dishes

could provide cytoprotection through adhesion.

(iii) E1 in dissolved form displayed better de-stressing/cytoprotection activity in

comparison to E1 in coated form, implying that E1 is a better antioxidant than

a cell adhesion/cytoprotective agent.

(iv) C2- coated displayed significantly better cell adhesion than E1-coated dishes

for most of the cases, implying C2 to be a comparatively better cell adhesion

agent.

(v) C2-dissolved dishes, for the most part, displayed very little cytoprotective

activity, reflective of the fact that C2 wasn‟t an antioxidative agent as reported

in section 6.3.1.

(vi) For Cr (VI) and Hg (II) generated stress, adherent cell counts were

significantly equal for C2-coated and C2-dissolvced. However, for stress

generated by Fe (II), H2O2 and Fe (II)/H2O2, C2-coated registered more live

cells than C2-dissolved. Cell survival on C2-coated dishes was significantly

better if the stressors generated pure ROS stress, rather than metal-generated

stress.

154

6.3.2.1 STRESS GENERATION BY THE AGENTS

Exogenously administered H2O2 induces cell death through apoptosis and

necrosis in a concentration-dependent manner (Choi et al 2009). H2O2 reacts with Fe2+

to

form Fe3+

, •OH radical, and

–OH ion (Fenton reaction), which can react further to form

the ferryl ion.

Fe2+

+ H2O2 → Fe3+

+ •OH +

–OH

→ Fe=O2+

+ H2O

Either species is a powerful oxidant and can cause massive damage to living tissue. H2O2

by itself can stimulate the upregulation and activity of redox-oriented enzymes such as

NOS and NADPH oxidase. This may lead to unregulated production of superoxide

radicals initiating further H2O2 leading to a vicious cycle (Gough and Cotter, 2011).

Superoxide anions can also have an effect on several signalling pathways; including Map

kinases, angiotensin II signalling and cell proliferation pathways. Additionally,

superoxide anions stimulates the release of intracellular Fe (II) from cellular stores

allowing for uncontrolled Fenton‟s reaction with H2O2 leading to hydroxyl ions.

Cr (VI) is a powerful oxidant and it can gain entry inside cells via sulphate

transport protein. Once inside, the reduction of Cr (VI) by human cytochrome b5 may

lead to the production both Cr (IV) and Cr (V). Either of the species can react with H2O2

to produce HO• radical by a Fenton-like reaction.

Cr4+

/Cr5+

+ H2O2 → Cr5+

/Cr6+

+ •OH+ HO

Cr (VI) can also be reduced to Cr (III), primarily by ascorbate in a manner that also leads

to hydroxyl and superoxide radical production. Cr (III) due to its low tendency to cross

the cell membrane gets trapped inside the cell, enabling it to form stable Cr (III)

complexes with DNA (Borthiry et al 2007; Nickens et al 2010).

Hg ions are known to generate stress through various mechanisms: (i) formation

of covalent bonds with cysteine residues of proteins. (ii) impairing electron transport in

the mitochondria leading to increase H2O2 and superoxide production, (iii) alteration in

Ca levels, leading to increase in enzyme activation and further ROS production and (iv)

increase in lipid peroxidation. Overall, the known increased toxicity of Hg salts when

compared to other metals, required the concentration ranges used for the assay to be

decreased to the µM level

155

6.3.2.2 DE-STRESSOR PATHWAYS

The results of this study confirmed that cell survival was achieved by the peptides

through two different mechanisms. One pathway involved scavenging of free radicals and

the other, through adhesion. Both the pathways are illustrated in Fig. 6.8

Fig. 6.8 Schematic representation of the two mechanisms through which C2 and E1

display cytoprotective effects. The dark arrows represent the pathways leading to cell

death in presence of stress. The red arrows and circles represent the action of the

peptides. E1 in the dissolved form (Ed) scavenges free radicals formed along with

chelation of Fe (II) and Cr (III) and possibly Hg (II). In the coated form, E1 and C2

maintain cell adhesion and possibly activate anti-apoptotic pathways.

6.3.2.2.1 DE-STRESSING THROUGH ROS NEUTRALIZATION

ROS generation by metals occurs through a common reaction;

Metal + prooxidant = Metal (oxidized) + reduced prooxidant + •OH…Eqn. (1)

Antioxidants like BHT and vitamin E generally disrupt this equilibrium by scavenging

the reactive radical formed but leaves chance for more radical production as the metal

responsible for radical production is not affected.

Antioxidant + •OH = Oxidised antioxidant + H2O…………… Eqn. (2)

Stress reduction activity of peptides such as E1 could be two-fold; E1 has been reported

to be a radical scavenger as well as a metal-chelator. Thus it can hamper both sides of the

equilibrium in Eqn. 1, effectively cutting off the metal from the pro-oxidant and by

Cr4+

/Cr5+

+ H2O2 → Cr5+

/Cr6+

+ •OH + OH

Fe2+

+ H2O2 → Fe3+

+ •OH +

–OH

→ Fe=O2+

+ H2O

ascorbate Cr

3+ +

•OH

Complex formation

with DNA

+

other biomolecules

Cr6+

Cytochrome b5

Hg2+ Disruption of ETC in

mitochondria

E1d

E1d

Uncontrolled reactions

leading to further ROS

production.

Loss of FAK

formation

Loss in cell

adhesion

C2, E1

Interaction

with integrin

Apoptosis/ Necrosis

? ?

156

scavenging the product •OH radicals. This form of efficient stress neutralization probably

ensures cell survival even at higher stressor concentrations. An indirect evidence of such

activity is reflected in the fact that Fe-induced toxicity is seen to harm the cells the least,

even though Fe (II) can interact with cellular H2O2 and is capable of inducing significant

damage.

There are two major factors influencing coordination of metal by peptides;

reactive state of the peptide amide group and the side chain residues with coordination

properties. The effect of side chain residues on the stability of peptide complexes have

been studied with a number of residues. The alcoholic-OH from S and T, -COO– from D

and E and NH3+ from Lys have been implicated in coordinate bond formation to metal

ions along with the free N- and C-terminal groups (Davies 2006). E1 displays the

following characteristics: (i) N-terminal G and a C-terminal Q, (ii) % occurrences of

amino acids are G (33.3%), E (8.3%), R, Q, T (5.6%) and K (2.8%). Presence of

hydrophilic residues E, Q, T, R and K were possibly responsible for metal chelation

property.

Most of the metal-peptides complex structures report a closed loop or ringed

structure with the COO– and amide N or the N –terminus satisfying the coordination sites

for the central metal ion (Davies, 2006). Fe (II) chelation is known to occur through the

carboxylate groups of E, which had a % occurrence of 8.3% in E1 (Lv et al 2009). The

peptide E1 could possibly have some role in Cr (III) chelation also. Crystal structures of

octahedral complexes of Cr (III) with peptides and amino acids have revealed a variety of

binding modes. Cr (III) has the ability to bond to carboxylate oxygen, amino nitrogen,

imidazole nitrogen and sulfhydryl donor atoms and is known to form stable complexes

with collagen via –COOH chelation from residues E and D (Covington and Covington

2009). Several studies have reported that peptides rich in E, D, G and C have been found

to be efficient Cr (III) chelators and are useful in Cr removal from portal circulation

(Bertini et al 2001; Dinakarpandian et al 2004). Possibly, the presence of excess amounts

of G along with a moderate amount of E could render peptide E1 with Cr (III)-chelating

properties. Complex formation with Hg (II) requires the presence of C and H residues

(Ngu-Schwemlein et al 2009). The absence of such residues in E1 would possibly restrain

it from direct Hg (II) chelation. Antioxidative agents supplied with chelating agents have

already been reported to be an effective treatment against acute metal toxicity.

Combinatorial therapies like treatment with antioxidants like NAC, lipoic acid, melatonin

and gossypin have shown considerable promise in decreasing clinical pathologies related

157

to ROS and heavy metal-generated stress (Flora and Pachauri 2010). NAC is known to

have free radical scavenging properties and the thiol groups provide chelation sites for

metal ions. Co-administration of several antioxidative/chelating agents along with

vitamins has been proven to display reversal of the stress-induced altered parameters

(Arrigo et al 2005; Marreilha dos Santos et al 2008).

Peptides offer a unique advantage. Presence of a variety of functional residues

allows a bioactive peptide to display high solubility in both aqueous and lipid medium

along with specificity of action. Collagen peptides isolated from fish skin collagen has

been found to offer cyto-protection to a wide array of cell lines including keratinocytes,

fibroblasts and macrophages (Ngo et al 2010; Kato et al 2011).

6.3.2.2.2 DE-STRESSING THROUGH CELL ADHESION

Integrin-ECM interaction has been found to be necessary for cell survival in the

event of stress. The dynamic cytoskeleton is an interconnected continuous network inside

cells capable of transmitting tension from ECM and other cells. A balance between

tensile filaments and resistive focal points and cellular junctions determines the overall

cell shape. An outside interference, like presence of excessive stress can lead to loss of

cell-matrix adhesion and a shift in the cellular balance of forces, resulting in changes in

cell shape and detachment from the surface (Lum and Roebuck, 2001). This leads to cell

division suspension and the activation of pro-apoptotic pathways ultimately leading to

cell death. Loss of cell-matrix attachment also leads to metabolic stress characterized by

reduced nutrient uptake, decreased entry of glucose into citric acid cycle, decreased ATP

production and further increase in ROS (Grassian et al 2011).

C2 in the coated form supported significantly higher cell adhesion and survival,

when compared to its dissolved form, indicating its effectiveness as a de-stressor peptide

working through cell adhesion. Overall, both C2- and E1-coated ensured significantly

higher cell survival when compared to CCS, emphasizing the role of cell adhesion in

countering stress.

It is a well accepted fact that suitable coating materials can influence the adhesion

rate by virtue of a firm cell-to-coated material interaction resulting in faster cell

spreading. Peptides C2 and E1, by virtue of their small size could supply a relatively

greater number of integrin recognition domains per cm2.

This would lead to better cell adhesion when compared to collagen, which would be

adsorbed on the dish surface in a random orientation due to its large size, resulting in

158

comparatively lesser number of integrin recognition sites per cm2. A firm ECM-integrin

attachment can increase integrin clustering, hastening up the focal adhesion sites

formation. Once FAS is formed, a number of cellular signals including anti apoptotic, cell

spreading and proliferation rate could be affected, all eventually leading to higher

survival rates. In the presence of low amounts of stress, the activity between E1 and C2 in

coated form is almost similar (p>0.05) but the difference widens in presence of higher

concentration of stressors, particularly so if the stressors are H2O2 and/or Fe (II) based

(p<0.002).

This study suggests that C2 and E1 can supply a more firm integrin-peptide

interaction resulting in increased cell adhesion, leading to cell survival even in the

presence of stressor agents. The predicament of C2 towards countering specifically redox

stress indicates that E1 and C2 may initiate different signalling patterns. RGD-containing

peptides like E1 interact with αVβ3, αVβ5, αVβ6 and αVβ8 subtypes of integrin receptor

while C2 is thought to interact with the collagen-binding integrin subtypes: α1β1, α2β1,

α10β1 and α11β1.

ROS can be lethal for cells causing apoptosis through caspase activation or

necrosis through poly-(ADP-Ribose) polymerase over-activation. ROS triggers apoptosis

through activation of sphingomyelinase-generating ceramide and alteration in

mitochondrial redox balance, resulting in release of cytochrome c from mitochondria,

Cytochrome c activates Apaf 1, consequently activating caspase 9 and leading to the

formation of apoptosome (Fiers et al 1999; Ha and Synder, 1999). Integrin-ligand

interactions are implicated in cellular resistance to apoptotic stimuli, particularly to

signals that activate the stress pathway or the mitochondrial pathway. Integrins preserve

cell viability in response to stress at several levels. Signalling by integrins regulates both

the expression and activity of several anti-apoptotic proteins. The ligation of integrins

α5β1 or αvβ3, the RGD-binding integrins has been reported to inhibit apoptosis through a

wide variety of stimulations. Two major pathways include the PI3-K/ PKB and the Raf/

MEK/ ERK signalling cascade. The downstream signalling leads to phosphorylation of

pro-apoptotic proteins followed by sequestering them to chaperones and activation of the

Bcl-2 family of anti-apoptotic proteins, resulting in inhibition of pore formation in the

mitochondria. Ligand-integrin-FAK formation leads to activation of Hsp 2, another anti-

apoptotic protein which inactivates caspases and prevents cytochrome c release. Last but

not the least, it results in the up-regulation of IAP (inhibitors of apoptotic pathway) class

of proteins, which performs a plethora of functions, including inactivating executioner

159

caspases and regulating cell division (Stupack and Cheresh, 2002; Gough and Cotter,

2011).

6.3.3 WOUND CLOSURE MONOLAYER ASSAY

The „scratch assay‟ is a direct and inexpensive process to study wound healing in

vitro. The assay is based on the fact that creation of an artificial „scratch‟ or a gap on a

fully confluent cell monolayer will cause the cells at the edges of the gap to move

towards each other for closing the gap and re-establishing contact. The assay was

conducted with Vero cell lines because of its faster doubling time in comparison to HeLa.

The photographs of wound closure under various circumstances are depicted in Fig. 6.9.

Cell migration was measured by calculation of %area covered by the inward moving cells

in a certain time period. In the absence of stress (Set I; Fig. 6.10a), the migration of the

cells was significantly faster on peptide coated dishes when compared to collagen

(p<0.02) and in general, gap closure on coated dishes were faster than uncoated dishes

(p<0.005).

Cells growing on E1 covered 77% of the area within 3h of the wound creation and

100% within 6h. C2 displayed 59% coverage at 3h and 99.6% in 9h. Cells growing on

collagen closed the wound completely within 12h whereas cells in uncoated dishes took

24h. In the 3rd

hour, area coverage in C2 and E1 was, on an average, 7 and 2 times more

than for uncoated and collagen coated dishes, respectively. In the presence of oxidative

stress (Set II; Fig. 6.10b), the uncoated dishes were unable to promote any cell adhesion.

Collagen coated dishes exhibited live, migrating cells but wound closure was partially

complete even after 24h. On the other hand, peptide coated dishes displayed live

migrating cells and even though a delay was observed, the gap was closed within 24h.

160

Fig. 6.9 Photographs of a wound area showing Vero cell migration for 24h in the

following situations:

a. Uncoated, without stress,

b. C2 coated, without stress,

c. C2 coated in presence of H2O2 and

d. C2 coated/ E1 dissolved along with H2O2.

The bar in the bottom right photomicrograph represents a length of 0.1mm.

0 3 6 9 12 18 24

a

b

c

d

161

a.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 3 6 9 12 18 24

Time (h)

%A

rea c

overe

d UC

C2

E1

Coll

b.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 3 6 9 12 18 24

Time (h)

% A

rea c

overe

d in

pre

sen

ce o

f H

2O

2 C2

E1

Coll

c.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 3 6 9 12 18 24

Time (h)

% A

rea c

overe

d in

pre

sen

ce o

f str

esso

r an

d

E1

C2;E1

E1; E1

Coll; E1

Fig. 6.10 Percentage area covered by migrating cells in three different situations:

a. Set I; in presence of coated peptides and collagen (Coll),

b. Set II, in presence of stress and coated peptides and

c. Set III, in presence of coated peptide, H2O2 as stressor and dissolved E1 as

destressor.

Values are given in mean of three areas ± SD.

162

Overall, the oxidative stress had a significant impact on wound closure; both E1-

coated and C2-coated dishes responded in a similar manner (p=0.59) but still displayed

relatively faster cell migration and quicker area coverage than collagen-coated dishes

(p<0.01).

Wound closure is a multi-component synergistic effect. To mimic the various

synergistic effects of the peptides occurring in the in vitro model of wound healing, E1 in

the dissolved form was added as an additional de-stressor (Set III; Fig. 6.10c). This had a

significant effect on cell survival and movement; the gap closure rate for C2- and

collagen-coated dishes was found to increase (p<0.04) in comparison to Set II.

Interestingly, gap closure in C2-coated/ E1-dissolved dishes was found to be

significantly faster (p<0.05) than collagen-coated/ E1-dissolved dishes. This could be

attributed to the synergistic effects between the activity of E1 in dissolved form and C2 in

coated form. E1 in the dissolved form acted as an efficient ROS de-stressor, removing

free radicals whereas C2 in the coated form acted through integrin receptors to maintain

adhesion. Consequently, the combination of these two peptides resulted in faster wound

closure. However, gap closure rate in E1-coated/ E1-dissolved dishes was found to be

significantly lower (p<0.02) than collagen/E1 and C2/E1 combinations, probably arising

from an „excess mass‟ effect and the recoiling tendency of collagen peptides. Cryptic

peptides generally display a hyperbolic increase in bioactivity along with concentration

and excess amounts actually decrease activity. Possibly in the E1/E1 situation, the

dissolved E1 in the media was being deposited on the exposed wound surface, thus

increasing the amount of coated peptide and reducing activity connect to chapters. A

decrease of E1 in the medium could also lead to lower ROS scavenging, again leading to

reduced gap closure.

To summarize, the two conditions with which maximum wound closure could be

observed under oxidative stress, were:

(i) C2 coated/ E1 dissolved and

(ii) collagen coated/ E1 dissolved.

163

6.3.4 GAP CLOSURE BY „CONTACT-GUIDANCE‟ IN PRESENCE OF PEPTIDES

Collective cell movement is responsible for wound closure. Gap closure takes

place through the initiation of few „leader‟ cells that are closely followed by a group of

„followers‟. The „leader‟ is a cell at the edge of the wound that extends a lamellipodium

in order to meet a similar cell from the other side of the edge. The neighbouring cells that

accompany them lag slightly behind but they form the mass of the connecting bridge.

This process of gap closure, termed as „contact guidance‟ is possible only when cells can

interact with a coated material (Haga et al 2005).

As displayed in Fig 6.9b, c and e, cells from both sides start extending into the wound

area during the 3rd

hour while cells on the uncoated surface displayed a lack of such cell

movement (Fig. 6.9a).

Leader cells exhibit enhanced tension along the length of the advancing

outgrowth. This produces a forward tension leading to reorientation of stress fibers and

through cell–cell contacts, the leader cell pulls the followers into the wound area

followed by subsequent active movement of neighbouring cells (Omelchenko et al 2003).

The stress fiber arrangements in the leader cell are probably initiated through interaction

of integrin and the coated ligand. Peptides like RGD and C2, in this study, in the coated

form are capable of integrin clustering, consequently leading to the arrangement of FAK

and stress fiber formation (Kawakami et al 2001). This is schematically represented in

Fig. 6.11.

For set II, leader cells could be observed in the 6th

hour (Fig. 6.9c) reaching out their

lamellipedia, but collective cell movement was absent. However, it was notable that the

cells survived even in the presence of stress and this could probably be attributed to the

presence of the coated peptide. The expected loss in filament tension leading to shape

loss and detachment of the cells was also not observed. Instead, the cells maintained the

usual shape, indicative of the retained arrangement of the actin fibers due to interaction

with the coated peptides.

In the 12th

hour, the cells were found scattered and unable to follow the earlier „leader-

follower‟ nomenclature, probably due to the stress. However, cells were eventually able

to cover the wound after 24 h. The situation is reverted back for cells in the presence of

dissolved E1 (Set III). The faster gap closure observed in Set III could probably be due to

the synergistic effect of the coated C2 leading to firm adhesion/leader cell formation and

ROS scavenging activity of E1.

164

Fig. 6.11 Schematic representation of events leading to faster leader cell formation on

peptide-coated dishes, as witnessed in the study. Presence of coated peptide results in

faster stress fiber formation, leading to rapid „leader‟ cell formations that reach out to

close the gap.

Wound healing is a complex biochemicall response consisting of a hierarchy of

chemical stimulations and the consequent physiological effects on cells. Collagen

remodelling during stress or skin wound healing by incoming fibroblasts could degrade

the basal collagen (primarily type I) leading to release of several cryptic peptides, which

act as key players in the healing process. This study emphasizes the probable role of

collagen peptides in stress handling and de-stressing through the process of cell adhesion.

Left edge of the wound

FAK complex

Integrins

Cell-cell adhesion

proteins

Stress fibers

Actin fibers

Peptide-coated surface

Collagen-coated surface