30
183 chAPTeR 9. Markets David N. Wear, Jeffrey Prestemon, Robert Huggett, and Douglas Carter 1 key FiNDiNGS • Although timber production in the South more than doubled from the 1960s to the late 1990s, output levels have declined over the last 10 years, signaling structural changes in timber markets. • For softwood products, production declines are most clearly related to demand issues. Demand for softwood solid wood products is strongly linked to housing markets, and a sharp decline in construction beginning in 2007 reduced timber demand, a short run adjustment. Demand for pulpwood in paper manufacturing has declined as the production capacity has dropped in the South, a long run adjustment. • As demand declined, investments in softwood production continued to expand, leading to supply growth for all softwoods, but especially for softwood pulpwood. The net result was a substantial reduction in softwood pulpwood prices. • In contrast to softwood products, hardwood pulpwood output declined and its price increased in the 2000s, indicating a contraction of supply, especially in the Coastal Plain where paper production is concentrated. • Several forecasts of timber markets show expanding supplies of softwood timber, especially softwood pulpwood, as new plantations mature and additional plantations accumulate across the South. Across all forecasts, softwood pulpwood supply expands through the next 40 years, while softwood sawtimber supply grows over the next decade and then stabilizes. • Forecasts of hardwood supplies indicate a gradual contraction as urbanization shrinks inventories. • If timber product demand returns to and stays at the 2006 levels, total timber production is forecasted to expand by about 25 percent over the next 50 years, with little impact on the price of softwood sawtimber and hardwood pulpwood. Softwood pulpwood prices would decline by about 50 percent. 1 David N. Wear is the Project Leader, Center for Integrated Forest Science, Southern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Raleigh, NC 27695; Jeffrey Prestemon is a Research Forester at the Forest Economics and Policy Research Work Unit, Southern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; Robert Huggett is a Research Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695; Douglas Carter is a Professor, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. • If demand growth returns to 1980s and 1990s levels, total timber production could expand by about 40 percent over the next 50 years, with the greatest gains in softwood pulpwood output. Softwood pulpwood prices stabilize at 2006 levels while softwood sawtimber and hardwood pulpwood prices would increase at an average annual rate of slightly less than 1 percent. • Growth in demand, coupled with gains in the productivity of planted pine forests, would likely expand total timber production by about 70 percent, with the production of softwood pulpwood more than tripling. The price of softwood sawtimber would stabilize, the price of softwood pulpwood would fall at less than 1 percent per year, and the price of hardwood pulpwood would increase by less than 1 percent per year. • Forecasts indicate that the South’s timber supply could expand if moderate rates of future forest investments are added to investments in forests made over the past 20 years. Forecasts for 2055 show that annual production of softwood pulpwood could increase beyond 2006 levels by an additional 2.4 billion to 3.7 billion cubic feet (36.6 million to 57.9 million green tons) without substantial price effects. • Timber production has the potential to expand substantially in the South, but future markets are likely to be limited by demand levels. Bioenergy is a potential but highly uncertain source of demand. Recovery of housing-related demand for wood products remains a key uncertainty in the short run. • Without an expansion in timber demand, private forest owners would be expected to eventually experience a strong shift away from forest management as investment returns diminish to the point where continued investments cannot be justified. iNTRoDucTioN Timber production from the South grew substantially and steadily from 1950 to the late 1990s. Although production has declined from 1997/1998 peak levels, the region still provides a majority of the timber products produced in the United States (Smith and others 2009). Rapid growth in production from 1970 to 1998 did not, however, deplete standing inventories of biomass because high growth rates and investments in agricultural-style forestry increased Chapter 9. markets

Chapter 9. markets · 2013-12-08 · 183 chAPTeR 9. Markets David N. Wear, Jeffrey Prestemon, Robert Huggett, and Douglas Carter1 key FiNDiNGS • Although timber production in the

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

183chAPTeR 9. Markets

DavidN.Wear,JeffreyPrestemon,RobertHuggett, andDouglasCarter1

key FiNDiNGS

•AlthoughtimberproductionintheSouthmorethandoubledfromthe1960stothelate1990s,outputlevelshavedeclinedoverthelast10years,signalingstructuralchangesintimbermarkets.

• Forsoftwoodproducts,productiondeclinesaremostclearlyrelatedtodemandissues.Demandforsoftwoodsolidwoodproductsisstronglylinkedtohousingmarkets,andasharpdeclineinconstructionbeginningin2007reducedtimberdemand,ashortrunadjustment.DemandforpulpwoodinpapermanufacturinghasdeclinedastheproductioncapacityhasdroppedintheSouth,alongrunadjustment.

•Asdemanddeclined,investmentsinsoftwoodproductioncontinuedtoexpand,leadingtosupplygrowthforallsoftwoods,butespeciallyforsoftwoodpulpwood.Thenetresultwasasubstantialreductioninsoftwoodpulpwoodprices.

• Incontrasttosoftwoodproducts,hardwoodpulpwoodoutputdeclinedanditspriceincreasedinthe2000s,indicatingacontractionofsupply,especiallyintheCoastalPlainwherepaperproductionisconcentrated.

• Severalforecastsoftimbermarketsshowexpandingsuppliesofsoftwoodtimber,especiallysoftwoodpulpwood,asnewplantationsmatureandadditionalplantationsaccumulateacrosstheSouth.Acrossallforecasts,softwoodpulpwoodsupplyexpandsthroughthenext40years,whilesoftwoodsawtimbersupplygrowsoverthenextdecadeandthenstabilizes.

• Forecastsofhardwoodsuppliesindicateagradualcontractionasurbanizationshrinksinventories.

• Iftimberproductdemandreturnstoandstaysatthe2006levels,totaltimberproductionisforecastedtoexpandbyabout25percentoverthenext50years,withlittleimpactonthepriceofsoftwoodsawtimberandhardwoodpulpwood.Softwoodpulpwoodpriceswoulddeclinebyabout50percent.

1DavidN.WearistheProjectLeader,CenterforIntegratedForestScience,SouthernResearchStation,U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,Raleigh,NC27695;JeffreyPrestemonisaResearchForesterattheForestEconomicsandPolicyResearchWorkUnit,SouthernResearchStation,U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,ResearchTrianglePark,NC27709;RobertHuggettisaResearchAssistantProfessor,DepartmentofForestryandEnvironmentalResources,NorthCarolinaStateUniversity,Raleigh,NC27695;DouglasCarterisaProfessor,SchoolofForestResourcesandConservation,UniversityofFlorida,Gainesville,FL32611.

• Ifdemandgrowthreturnsto1980sand1990slevels,totaltimberproductioncouldexpandbyabout40percentoverthenext50years,withthegreatestgainsinsoftwoodpulpwoodoutput.Softwoodpulpwoodpricesstabilizeat2006levelswhilesoftwoodsawtimberandhardwoodpulpwoodpriceswouldincreaseatanaverageannualrateofslightlylessthan1percent.

•Growthindemand,coupledwithgainsintheproductivityofplantedpineforests,wouldlikelyexpandtotaltimberproductionbyabout70percent,withtheproductionofsoftwoodpulpwoodmorethantripling.Thepriceofsoftwoodsawtimberwouldstabilize,thepriceofsoftwoodpulpwoodwouldfallatlessthan1percentperyear,andthepriceofhardwoodpulpwoodwouldincreasebylessthan1percentperyear.

• ForecastsindicatethattheSouth’stimbersupplycouldexpandifmoderateratesoffutureforestinvestmentsareaddedtoinvestmentsinforestsmadeoverthepast20years.Forecastsfor2055showthatannualproductionofsoftwoodpulpwoodcouldincreasebeyond2006levelsbyanadditional2.4billionto3.7billioncubicfeet(36.6millionto57.9milliongreentons)withoutsubstantialpriceeffects.

•TimberproductionhasthepotentialtoexpandsubstantiallyintheSouth,butfuturemarketsarelikelytobelimitedbydemandlevels.Bioenergyisapotentialbuthighlyuncertainsourceofdemand.Recoveryofhousing-relateddemandforwoodproductsremainsakeyuncertaintyintheshortrun.

•Withoutanexpansionintimberdemand,privateforestownerswouldbeexpectedtoeventuallyexperienceastrongshiftawayfromforestmanagementasinvestmentreturnsdiminishtothepointwherecontinuedinvestmentscannotbejustified.

iNTRoDucTioN

TimberproductionfromtheSouthgrewsubstantiallyandsteadilyfrom1950tothelate1990s.Althoughproductionhasdeclinedfrom1997/1998peaklevels,theregionstillprovidesamajorityofthetimberproductsproducedintheUnitedStates(Smithandothers2009).Rapidgrowthinproductionfrom1970to1998didnot,however,depletestandinginventoriesofbiomassbecausehighgrowthratesandinvestmentsinagricultural-styleforestryincreased

Chapter 9. markets

184The Southern Forest Futures Project

forestproductivity—plantedpineforestsnowrepresent19percentofsouthernforestland.Recentharvestdeclinesraisequestionsaboutthefutureoftimbermarkets,andrecentpolicydiscourseabouttheuseofwoodtoproduceenergyonlargescalessuggestspotentialforuncertaintyandstructuralchangesinthesemarkets.

Theobjectivesofthischapteraretoexaminethehistoryofchangeinforestproductsmarketsandtoconsiderpotentialfutures.Weusehistoricalrecordsofharvestquantitiesandtimberpricestotestgeneralhypothesesaboutchangesinsupplyanddemand.Supplyforecastsandtrendsinproductdemandarethenusedtoanalyzemarketpotentialandtoconstructalternativeforecastsofharvestsandtimberprices.Throughouttheseanalyses,thechapteraddressesthefollowingspecificquestions:

•Howhavemarketsforforestproductschanged,especiallyinthepastdecade?

•Whataretheimplicationsofthesechangesforthefutureoftimbermarkets?

•Howistimbersupplyprojectedtochange?•Whatfactorsinfluencethefutureofforestproductdemandandwhataretheimplicationsfortimbermarkets?

•Howmightmarketsdevelopinresponsetoalternativescenariosforfuturesupplyanddemand?

influences on Timber Supply

Timbersupplydefineshowlandownersdelivertimbertomarketinresponsetotimberpricesand,inthelongerrun,toavarietyofothersignals.Severalfactorsmakeitdifficulttoanalyzethetimbersupplysituation,includingthelongproductionperiodinvolvedingrowingtrees,themultiplebenefitsthatlandownerscanderivefromstandingforests,andconstantchangesinthelandbasefromwhichtimberisproduced.Itiscommontothinkofsupplyassimplytherelationshipbetweenharvestsandpricesbuttheseotherfactorsneedtobeaccountedfor,especiallywhenconsideringlongrunsupplydynamics.

Suppliesoftimberareultimatelydeterminedbytheintersectionofthebiologicalproductioncapacityofforestsandthepreferencesofforestlandowners.Thischapterdescribesalternativeproductionpossibilitiesbyevaluatingalternativeassumptionsaboutproductivity.Italsoconsidersarangeofproducerbehaviorbyconsideringalternativeprojectionsofforestinvestments(plantationreplacementandestablishment),basedonthehistoricalbehaviorofprivateforestlandowners.

influences on Timber Demand

Demandisaneconomicconceptthatrelatestheconsumptionofacommoditytoitsprice.Economictheoryindicates

thatlessofacommodityisconsumedatahigherpriceandthatchartingallthepossibleprice-consumptioncombinationsdefinesademandcurve.Thiscurve,however,canberepositionedbasedonmanyfactorsotherthanthecommodity’sprice—suchasincome,pricesofsubstitutesforthecommodity,andchangingtastes.Inthischapter,weexaminedemandfortimberproductsbyanalyzingthevariousfactorsthatcouldalterdemandrelationships.Welookcloselyatsubstitutionpossibilities,productioncapacity,andinternationaltradeasindicatorsofchangesindomesticdemandfortimberproducts.

Perhapsthemostimportantuncertaintyaboutthefutureoftimberdemandisthedevelopmentofnewmarketsforfiberintheproductionofbioenergy.Asarenewableresource,forestbiomassmayplayanimportantroleinmeetinggoalsestablishedthroughrenewableportfoliostandards,andcellulosicfeedstocksforliquidfuelshavebeentargetedin2008FarmBillandotherpoliciesaimedatincreasingtheuseofrenewableenergy.Demandsforwoodforco-firingincoalfiredelectricityplantsandforproductionoffuelpelletshavealreadyemerged,althoughbiofuelproductiononalargescalewouldrequiretechnologicaladvances.Chapter10addressespotentialbioenergyfuturesindetail.

Scope of Analysis

Chapter10examineshowdemandforwoodintheproductionofbioenergycoulddevelopinthefuture,andwerefertothatchapterinexaminingafullrangeofmarketfutures.Whileevaluatingmarketfutures,wedonotattempttoforecastthebusinesscycle,inparticular,therecoveryfromthe2007recessionandthereturntohistoricaltrendsinproductdemand.Rather,ourfocusisonlongruntrendsand,ultimately,theimplicationsforforestsustainabilityandthecapacitytoadapttochangingdemandforfiberinthecomingyearsanddecades.

meThoDS

Theanalysisofhistoricalchangesintimbermarketspresentedherestartsbyupdatingthedatafromareport(Wearandothers2007)thatexaminedbasicprice-andharvest-quantityindicatorsandinterpretedpatternsofchangetoprovidegeneralinsightsintomarketdirectionandtrendsindemandandsupply.Asetofexplanatoryfactorsthathaveaffectedthedemandfortimberproducts—includingdomesticconditions,technologychanges,andinternationaltrade—placesdemandtrendsincontext.Ananalysisoftimbersupplyfundamentalsfocusesonlanduse,forestinvestment,andtimberlandownershipandtheireffectsonthefutureprovisionoftimberfromprivatelands.

Weuseempiricalmodelsoftimbersupplyanddemandtoexplorealternativefuturesfortimbermarkets.Futuretimber

185chAPTeR 9. Markets

supplyrelationshipsarederivedfromsimulationrunsoftheU.S.ForestAssessmentSystem’sForestDynamicsModeldescribedinchapters4and5.ThemodelsimulateschangeintheSouthonallplotsoftheForestInventoryandAnalysis(FIA)ProgramoftheForestService,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,includingharvestchoicesmadeinresponsetothefuturemarketconditionsdescribedbythepriceprojectionsofthesixCornerstoneFutures(chapter2):

•CornerstoneAdescribesafutureofveryrapideconomicandtechnologicalgrowth,combinedwithincreasingtimberprices.

•CornerstoneBisalsobasedonrapideconomicandtechnologicalgrowthbutcombinedwithdecreasingtimberprices.

•CornerstoneCisbasedonmoderatelevelsofeconomicdevelopmentandlessrapidbutmorediversetechnologicalchange,combinedwithincreasingtimberprices.

•CornerstoneDisalsobasedonmoderatelevelsofeconomicdevelopmentandlessrapidtechnologicalchange,butcombinedwithdecreasingtimberprices.

•CornerstoneEisbasedonCornerstoneAbutallowsforanincreasedrateofplantingfollowingtheharvestofnaturallyregeneratedforests.

•CornerstoneFisbasedonCornerstoneDbutwithadecreasedrateofforestplantingfollowingharvests.

HarvestchoicemodelsarebasedonempiricalmodelsofhistoricalharvestinglinkedtoFIAplotsintheSouth.Themodelsaresensitivetochangingforestproductivityandpricesthataffectnetrevenuesfromharvest/noharvestalternatives.UsingtheCornerstoneFutures,simulationsofharvestsforarangeofpricesaresummedacrossallplotstodefinethetimbersupplyfunction(definedastherelationshipbetweenaggregatetimberharvestquantitiesandtheirrespectivetimberpriceswithinaforecastperiod).Pricesforsoftwoodsawtimber,othersoftwoods,hardwoodsawtimber,andotherhardwoodsenterthecalculations(Polyakovandothers2010),andasetofempiricalsupplyfunctionsarederivedforthesefourproductclasses.

Supply Scenarios

WeusedamodifiedversionofthemethodoutlinedbyPolyakovandothers(2010)toconstructaggregatesupplies.ForasetofrelatedCornerstoneFutures—forexample,CornerstonesA,B,andE,thatsharethesamepopulationandeconomicgrowthfuturesbutapplydifferentpriceprojections—weusethesimulationstogeneratemultiplesupplyrealizations,specifically,abootstrappingapproach(employingrandomsamplingwithreplacement)ofsimulationsforeachStateineachtimeperiodthatgenerates1000observationsofsupply.Theserealizationsprovidethedataforregressionequationswheretheharvestquantityforeachproductismodeledasthefunctionofitsprice,

andcumulativeresultsforallproductsprovideestimatesofsupplymodelsineachperiod.Wesetuptheequationssothatthecoefficientonpriceistheown-priceelasticityofsupply(theratioofproportionalchangeinharvesttotheproportionalchangeinprice),andsothatsupplyforeachperiodreflectsforecastsoflandusechangeandresponsestoclimate,disturbances,andforestsuccession.

TheU.S.ForestAssessmentSystemmodelsthesupplyoftotalremovalsfrominventory,butourquestionstargetspecificproductmarkets.Estimatedquantitiesofproductsobtainedfromnumbersofremovalsderivefromutilizationcoefficientsthattranslatesawtimber-sizedremovalsandotherremovalsintowhatwelabelsawlogsandpulpwood.Sawlogsareusedintheproductionoflumberandveneerforpanels.Pulpwoodisdefinedasmaterialdeliveredforuseinthepapermanufacturingandinotherindustrialprocesses—especiallyforfuelwoodandforthemanufactureoforientedstrandboard.Thetimberproductoutputdatabase(Johnsonandothers2010)providesestimatesoftheseconversionfactors,whichweadjustedtoreflectthedifferencebetweenchip-and-sawsawlogsfromplantationsandsawtimberproductsfromnaturallyregeneratedforests.

Basic supply scenarios—WeconstructedtwosupplyscenariosfromtheCornerstoneFutures,onelabeled“HighGDP”toreflectthestrongeconomicandmoderatepopulationgrowthprojectionsofCornerstonesA,B,andE;andtheotherlabeled“LowGDP”toreflecttheweakeconomicandlowpopulationgrowthprojectionsofCornerstonesC,D,andF.

TheseforecastsofchangesinforestsarecontingentonprojectionsoftimberharvestsacrossprivateandpublicforestedplotsintheFIAinventoryusingmarket-drivenharvestprobabilitymodels(Polyakovandothers2010).HarvestpredictionsaredrivenbythepriceprojectionsthatarepartoftheassumptionsthatstructureeachoftheCornerstoneFutures.Weusetheseprojectionsofharveststoestimatesupplyfunctionsforthetwofundamentaleconomicstorylinestheyembody.Associatedforestconditionforecastsandlanduseforecastsaredescribedinchapters5and4,respectively.

Effects of productivity increases—TheimputationapproachadoptedfortheU.S.ForestAssessmentSystemthatundergirdsoursupplyprojectionsusescurrentobservedforestproductivitytoconstructforecasts.Thisisappropriateforshortrunsupplyforecasts,butrecentresearchindicatesthattheproductivityofpineplantationscouldexpandoverthenextseveralyears(McKeandandothers2003).Treeimprovementprogramshaveyieldedgenotypeswithlargegainsinproductivityandnewlyplantedforestsareexpectedtohaveevenlargerproductivitygains(withadditionalcrossingofsuperior

186The Southern Forest Futures Project

parents).Tissueculturepropagationalongwithotheradvancedgenetictechniquesmayincreaseoutputperacrebyevengreateramounts.Therateofdeploymentofimprovedplantingstockandtheproportionofestablishedplantationsreceivingintensivemanagementthroughouttheirrotationisunclearandcompoundstheuncertaintyofanyattempttoforecastproductivitygrowth.

Toexaminethepotentialcontributionsofthisenhancedproductivity,weadoptedastraightforwardsimulationapproachusinganadditiveformulathatincreasesproductivityby10percenteachdecade,sothatbythe2050saverageproductivityofplantedpineforestsis50percenthigherthanthecurrentlevel.Althoughweexpectincreasedproductivitytoeventuallyalterplantingdecisions,andthereforeskewsomeofthedecisionmodelsthatundergirdouranalysis,webelievethatthissimulationapproachprovidesafirstapproximationoflongrunproductionpotential.

Demand Scenarios

Weexaminetwodifferentdemandscenarios.Thefirst—labeledConstantDemand—holdsthedemandrelationshipsfortimberproductsin2006constantoverthe50-yearprojectionperiod.Thisisconsistentwithdemandstabilityforbothpaperandsolid-woodproductsandwouldbeconsistentwithsomesubstitutionwithinproductlines.Ineffect,itisconsistentwithmoderate(longrunaverage)housingdemandandthestabilityobservedinpulpandpapermarketsinthelate2000s.Demandwasmodeledusingaconstantelasticityequationbyintersectingtheharvest-priceobservationfor2006andapplyingexogenouslydeterminedown-priceelasticity,always-0.5,aswasconsistentwiththeliterature.Notethatconstantdemanddoesnotimplyconstantharvests.Ratheritholdsthedemandrelationshipbetweenpriceandharvestconstant,sopricesandharvestscanvaryovertimeinresponsetosupplyshifts.

Theseconddemandscenario—labeledExpandingDemand—examinesareturntodemandgrowthintheSouth.Underthisscenario,productdemandisassumedtoreturnto1996levelsby2015andthenexpand10percentperdecadethroughtheendoftheprojectionperiod.Thisisroughlyconsistentwithdemandgrowthinthe1980sand1990s.

Wedidnotconstructthesedemandscenariostoaddresschangesinworldtradeofforestproductsexplicitly,butinsteadassumedthattheycapturerangeofmarketrealizationsthatisusefulforourprojections,i.e.,theyshouldprovideusefulinsightsintothepotentialrangeofmarketresponsesoverthenext50years.

market Forecasts

Formarketforecastsdefinedbypermutationsofthesupplyanddemandscenarios,wereportforecastedharvestsandpricesforeverydecade.Inventoryandremovalsareconstructedonadecadalbasis,withinventoryreflectingtheconditionsattheendoftheperiodandremovalsreflectingtheaverageremovalsoverthepreviousdecade—forexample,the2030inventoryreflectsremovalsoccurringovertheyears2021–30.Allpricesareinreal2009dollarsandharvestforecastsare,afterapplyingconversionfactors,comparabletothehistoricaltimberproductoutputdataandreportedinsummaryreports(Johnsonandothers2010)forthe2010ResourcesPlanningAct(RPA)Assessment.

Data Sources

HistoricalharvestquantitydataarederivedfromthetimberproductoutputsystemoftheForestService,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture.ReportsofroundwoodoutputbyregionhavebeendevelopedfortheRPANationalInventoryDatabasefortheyears1952,1962,1977,1981,1996,2001,and2006(Smithandothers2001,2004,2009).ComparableannualdataforsoftwoodandhardwoodpulpwoodharvestshavebeencompiledfortheSouth(JohnsonandSteppleton2005).WealsoconstructedanannualseriesofsoftwoodsawlogproductionbyinterpolatingbetweentheRPAreportingyearsbasedontheproductionofsoftwoodlumberintheSouthasreportedbytheSouthernForestProductsAssociation.

ToexaminepricetrendsweconstructedregionalpriceindicesbasedonpricesreportedbyTimber-MartSouthforallsubregionsoftheSouth.Weconstructedpriceindicesbyproductclassbasedonpricesreportedforintra-StateareasbyTimberMart-South,witheachindexrepresentinganaverageweightedbytheinventoryvolumesofitsassociatedgeographicarea.Throughoutthispaperwereportpricesinrealterms,adjustedforinflationusingtheConsumerPriceIndexpricedeflator,with2009asthevaluebasis.Indicesoftimberpriceswerealsousedtoalloweasiercomparisonsamongproducttypes.Whenindiceswereused,wedefined1977asthebaseyear(theindexissetequalto1in1977)andappliedtheindexingtotherealpricesdescribedabove.

TradedataweretakenlargelyfromthedatabasecompiledbyDaniels(2008),whichsummarizesextensiverecordsonimportsandexportsfromtheU.S.DepartmentofCommercethrough2005.Othersecondarysourcesweretappedtoprovidedataonexports/importsofselectedproductsbeyond2005,woodproductscapacity,andvariouspriceindices.

187chAPTeR 9. Markets

ReSulTS

WestartthissectionbyexamininghowtimbermarketshavechangedintheSouthsincedetailedrecordshavebeenkept(withemphasisonthemostrecentchanges)usingtimberharvestsandpricesassummaryindicatorsofdevelopmentovertime.Webeginbyexamininghowharvestquantitiesandpriceshavechanged,andwherepossible,deconstructingthosechangesintoimpliedshiftsinsupplyanddemandtoaddcontext.

historical Timber markets

Southernforestsyieldawidevarietyofhardwoodandsoftwoodtimberproducts.Softwoodproductsconstituted71percentofharvestoutputin2006,thelatestyearforwhichcomprehensivetimberproductoutputdataareavailable(fig.9.1).Forty-twopercentoftotalharvestwasforsawlogsand38percentwasforpulpwoodproducts.Softwoodsawlogscomprisedthelargestproductclass(31percent),followedbysoftwoodpulpwood(26percent)andhardwoodpulpwood(12percent);thethreerepresentedroughly69percentofharvests,continuingatrendthatbeganinthe1970s(fig.9.1).

Timberharvestsfromsouthernforeststrendedstronglyupwardduringthelasthalfofthe20thcentury(fig.9.1).From1962to1996,annualharvestingmorethandoubledfromabout4toalmost10billioncubicfeet,witharelativelyconstantproductmix.Productionrangedfrom39to44percentfrompulpwoodand64to71percentfromallsoftwoods,withnoconsistenttrends.

Growthinharvestsforallproductswassteadyfromoneyeartothenextwithonlyafewexceptions(fig.9.2),themostnotablebeingadipinoutputduringabriefrecessioninthemid-1970s.Growthinharvestswasatitsstrongestfrom1982through1998,withoutputexpandingatacompoundrateof3.3percentperyear.Afterthislongperiodofstronggrowth,totalharvestquantityfellbyapproximately23percentfrom1997to2008,returningtotalharvestquantityto1987levels.Thisrepresentsthelargestandlongestdownturninharvestingoverthehistoricalperiod(1952to2008).

Trendsinthethreelargestproductclasses(fig.9.3)showthattheharvestdeclinewasledbyreductionsinhardwoodpulpwood(alossof42percent),followedby27percentforsoftwoodsawtimberand7percentforpulpwood.Mostofthedeclineinsoftwoodsawtimberproductionoccurredsince2005(fig.9.3).Wewereunabletoconstructanannualtimeseriesofhardwoodsawlogproduction(thefourthlargestproductclass)usingacomparabletechnique,buttheperiodicdata(fig.9.1)suggestthathardwoodsawtimberharvestswererelativelystableatleastthrough2006,with

incompletedatasuggestingsubstantialdeclinesbeginningin2007inassociationwiththehousing-relatedrecessionthatbeganthatyear.

Timberpricesareanindicatorofthescarcityoftimberasaninputtoproduction,andtheyreflecttheinteractionofsupplyanddemand:ifstumpagepricesincrease,thentimberbecomesrelativelyscarcer.Conversely,fallingstumpagepricesindicatethattimberisbecomingmoreabundantrelativetodemandforitsuse.Pricesforvariouswoodproductsdemonstratedavarietyoftrendsfrom1977to2009,theperiodforwhichwehavecomprehensivedata,indicatingthatscarcityorabundanceoftheseresourcesisacomplexandevolvingstory.

From1977tothelate1980s,timberpriceswereflat-to-decliningforallhardwoodandsoftwoodproducts(fig.9.4).Comparedto1977,softwoodsawtimberpricesdeclinedveryslightlythrough1991,softwoodpulpwoodpriceswereessentiallyflatthrough1989,andhardwoodpulpwoodpriceswereflatthrough1988.Harvestinggrewatmoderaterates(fig.9.3),withnoindicationsofincreasingscarcitythroughthelate1980s.

Pricepatternsbeganchangingbetween1989and1992(fig.9.4).Real-dollarpricesturnedupwardforallfourproductsandincreasedthrough1997or1998,whenproductionpeaked.From1988to1998,hardwoodpulpwoodpricesincreasedatanaverageannualrateof12percent,followedbysoftwoodpulpwoodat5percentandsoftwoodsawtimberat8percent.Hardwoodsawtimberpricesincreasedby6percentfrom1992to1998.Thesepricedataindicateincreasingscarcityforalltimberproductsoverthedecade.

From1998to2009,hardwoodpulpwoodandsawtimberpricesstabilized,andsoftwoodsawtimberpricesdeclinedfromtheirnear-peak1998level(onlyexceededin1979)andfrom2005to2009reachedtheirlowestlevelofthehistoricalperiod.Softwoodpulpwoodpriceshave,however,followedadecidedlydifferentpattern.From1998to2001,pricesforthisproductfelltoabouthalfoftheir1998value,theirlowestlevelofthehistoricalperiod,andhaveremainedatthislevelthrough2009.

Changesinharvestquantitiesandtimberpricessince1998suggestthattimbermarketshavebeenandcontinuetobedynamic.Softwoodproductpriceshavedeclinedfromtheirpeaklevels,buthardwoodproductpriceshaveremainedrelativelyconstant.Thesepricechanges,combinedwithharvestpatterns,suggestthatreturnsavailabletomosttimberlandownersarenowsubstantiallylowerthantheywereinthepeakyearsofthe1990s.Forsoftwoodpulpwood,thesepatternssuggestacontractioninpulpwooddemandcoupledwithstable-to-expandingsupplyofstandingpulpwood-sizedtimber.Incontrast,hardwoodpulpwood

190The Southern Forest Futures Project

seemstohavebecomesomewhatscarcer;softwoodpulpwoodpriceswereabouttwiceashighashardwoodpulpwoodpricesintheearly1990s,butthetwoproductsarenowroughlyequalinprice(fig.9.4).

LookingjointlyatpriceandharvestchangesforthethreelargestproductclassesintheSouth(fig.9.5),wecandefinethreedistinctperiodsofdevelopmentfrom1977to2008.

Moderate growth phase (1977 to 1986)—Duringthisperiod,harvestsofallproductsincreasedatamoderateratewhiletimberpricesstayedconstantorevendeclinedforallthreeofthemajorproducts.Thesetrendsareconsistentwithexpansionofbothsupplyanddemandfortheproducts—thatis,forestinvestmentsgeneratedadditionalwoodsupplyandkeptpricesfromincreasingwithoutput.

Rapid growth phase (1986 to 1998)—Duringthisperiod,harvestsofhardwoodpulpwood,softwoodpulpwood,andsoftwoodsawtimbercontinuedtoincreasebutatfasterratesthantheearlierperiod.Pricesfortheseproductsalsoincreased,andatahigherratethanforharvests.Thispatternisconsistentwithastrongexpansionintimberdemandbutdoesnotprovideconclusiveevidenceofchangeintimbersupply.Itisconsistent,however,withdemandexpandingfasterthansupply.Incontrast,productionwasstablebutpriceincreasedforhardwoodsawtimber,signalingatighteningofhardwoodsawlogsupply.

Adjustment phase (1998 to 2009)—Followingtheproductionpeakson1997through1998,fundamentalchangesinoutputandpricetrendssuggestimportantchangesintimbermarkets.Forhardwoodpulpwood,pricesinitiallyfellandthenincreasedagainfrom2001to2009,andharvestsdeclinedsteadilythroughouttheperiod,fallingbyabout60percent.Fallingoutputwithincreasingpricesindicatesacontractioninsupplyforhardwoodpulpwoodovertheperiod,irrespectiveofdemandchanges.Forsoftwoodpulpwood,harvestsfellabout7percentfrom1997to2000,andthenstabilized,butpricesfellbyabout50percentbetween1998and2001andhaveremainedatthislevelthrough2009.Decreasingpriceswithastableoutputisconsistentwithastrongexpansioninthesupplyofsoftwoodpulpwood.Forsoftwoodsawtimber,simultaneousdeclinesinharvestandpricesindicatethatmarketsweredominatedbyacontractionofdemandfrom2005to2009,coincidentwithstrongdeclinesinthedemandforU.S.housingconstruction.

Demand Trends for Pulp and Paper Products

Forseveraldecades,theUnitedStateshasproducedmorewoodpulpthananyothernation.In2006,hardwoodandsoftwoodpulpwoodmadeup36percentofthetimberconsumedintheSouth.Theregion’spapermillsareconcentratedinthefewareaswhereplentifulwateris

available.TheseareasincludesoutheasternGeorgia,northeasternFlorida,andsouthernAlabamaandMississippi.ConcentrationofpaperproductioncapacityorganizesthedemandforpulpwoodwithintheSouth:demandforpulpwoodisstrongestinthevicinityofmillsandweakenswithdistancefromthemillgate(fig.9.6).Althoughsatellitechipmillsdistributedthedemandforpulpwoodoverawiderareainthe1990s,pulpwoodmarketsarestillmuchmoreconcentratedgeographicallythanaremarketsforsolidwood.

Therawmaterialforproductionofpaperproductscomesfrompulpwood-gradetrees,fromwoodproductmanufacturingresiduals,andincreasinglyfromrecycledfiber.Ince(2000)showsthatrecycledmaterialcomprised37.9percentofU.S.paperproductsin1998,upfrom23.9percentin1985.Thishasresultedinadropinthedemandforvirginwoodfiber.TheamountofrecycledmaterialusedinU.S.papermanufacturingmayhavereachedamaximum,especiallygivenstrongexportdemandforrecoveredpaper.Soitislikelythatexpandinguseofrecycledmaterialmitigateddemandandpriceincreasesduringtherapidgrowthphase(1986to1998),butthatchangesindemandforrecycledmaterialhavenotbeenamajorinfluenceintheadjustmentphase(since1998).

Pulpingcapacitywithintheregiondefinestheupperlimitforpulpwooddemand,atleastintheshortrun.Becauseexpandingcapacitythroughconstructionrequiresalargecommitmentofcapital(typicallyinthe$2billionrange),trendsincapacityprovideastrongindicatorofcurrentandanticipateddemandforpulpwood.Through1998,bothU.S.andsouthernpulpmillcapacitytrendedupward(fig.9.7).Sincethen,U.S.capacityhasdecreasedonlyslightly,whileSoutherncapacitydecreasedby16percentbeforestabilizingin2003(fig.9.8).Therateofdecreaseinsoutherncapacitywasmuchlowerthandecreasesinthenumberofpapermills,reflectinganincreasedconcentrationofproductioninremainingplants.

AccompanyingthesedeclinesindomesticcapacitywasanexpansionincapacitybyothercountriessuchaSweden,Finland,Chile,andBrazil(fig.9.9).AlthoughtheUnitedStatesandtheSouthcontinuetoleadinpulpwoodproduction,theirshareofworldwidecapacityhasdeclinedsince1991.By2003,pulpcapacityintheSouthhadreturnedtoits1985level(wellshortofthe1998level),whereitremainedthrough2008.

Newpulpmillcapacityandpulpproductionisfeedingincreasedworldwide(andespeciallyAsian)demandforpaperproducts.Withlevel-to-decliningcapacityintheUnitedStates,itisclearthatthenewcapacityisbeingdevelopedelsewhere.Thesechangesarelikelyexplainedbyshiftsincomparativeadvantageresultingfromseveralfactors,includinglaborcosts,rawmaterialscosts,andproximityto

194The Southern Forest Futures Project

finalproductmarkets,whichcontrolstransportationcosts.OthercontributingfactorsincludetheshrinkageofU.S.manufacturing,whichrequirespaperforpackaging,andthedemandforpulpwoodinproductslikeorientedstrandboard.

Manufacturingcostsforkraftlinerboard(fig.9.10)provideanexampleofdifferencesincomparativeadvantageamongregionsandcountries.TheSouthiscompetitiveinthismarketcomparedtotheWesternUnitedStates,Canada,andEurope,butitscoststructurelagsbehindLatinAmericancountries(primarilyBrazilandChile),mainlybecausefiberandlaborcostsaresignificantlylowerinlessindustrializedcountries.TheSouthretainscomparativeadvantagebecauseofitsproximitytoU.S.demandcenters(therebyloweringtransportationcosts),butlaborandwoodcostdifferentialsmakeLatinAmericanproducersviablecompetitors.

In1995,1999,and2004,bothBrazilianandChileanproducerscoulddeliversoftwoodandhardwood(mostlyEucalyptus)pulpwoodtomillsatsubstantiallylowercostthanproducersintheSouth(fig.9.11).In2004,deliveredsouthernsoftwoodpulpwoodwas24percenthigherthaninBrazil(21percentforhardwoodpulpwood)and27percenthigherthaninChile(27percentforhardwoodpulpwood).Pricedifferentialsarenotstatichowever,andpricesinBrazilandChilehaverisensince1999.Thecomparativeadvantageheldbythesenationswoulddecreaseifthistrendweretocontinue.

Demand Trends for Solid Wood Products

ThelargemajorityofthesolidwoodproducedintheSouthgoesintolumberandpanelproducts,comprisingabout52percentin2006.Theregion’slumbermills,unlikeitspulpandpapermills,arewidelydispersed(fig.9.12).Southernsoftwoodsawmillcapacitygrewsteadilyfrom1995to2005andthendeclinedslightlythrough2009(Spelterandothers2009),mirroringastrongdeclineinlumberproductionassociatedwiththedeclineinU.S.housingconstruction(fig.9.13).ComparabledataarenotavailableforhardwoodlumbercapacityintheSouth.

McKeeverandSpelter(1998)reportthatsouthernpanelcapacityexpandedsignificantlyinthe1990s(fig.9.14).From1998to2009,orientedstrandboardcapacitynearlydoubled(APA-TheEngineeredWoodAssociation2010)from7,900to13,840squarefeet(3/8-inchbasis),representing81percentoftotalU.S.capacity.Incontrast,southernpineplywood,whichdominatedpanelproductionthroughthe1970s,peakedinthe1990sandhassincedeclined(APA-TheEngineeredWoodAssociation2010).Atthe1996peak,plywoodcapacitywas14,530millionsquarefeet(3/8-inchbasis)butfellto9,190squarefeetby2009(APA-TheEngineeredWoodAssociation2010).Capacityformediumdensityfiberboardproductiongrewstronglythroughthe1990s.

Morerecentdataindicatethatalthoughsouthernpanelproductionremainedstablefrom1996to2007andfellprecipitouslyin2008/2009becauseofthe2007recessionandhousingmarketcollapse,orientedstrandboardasashareofproductionhascontinuedtogrow(fig.9.15).Expandingorientedstrandboardcapacitycoupledwithdecliningplywoodcapacitysuggestsincreasingdemandforlessexpensive,small-diametertimber,especiallywhencomparedtotheveneerlogsusedinplywoodproduction.

Unlikethedemandforpaperproducts,whichismostclearlylinkedtogenerallevelsofeconomicactivity,notablymanufacturingactivity,demandforsolidwoodproductsisstronglylinkedtotheconstructionindustry.Housingstartsinparticularprovideastrongcorrelatetotheconsumptionofsolidwoodproducts,andrecenteconomicdevelopmentsareastrongreminderthatthehousingmarketiscyclical.Peaksinhousingstartsintheearly1970s,inthelate1970s,inthemid-1980s,andin2006haveallbeensucceededbyrapiddeclinesofatleast30percent(fig.9.16),withthesecyclescenteringonabaselevelofabout1.5millionunitsperyear.Withinthiscontext,themostrecentdeclineandcontinuingstagnationofhousingmarketsisunprecedented.Afterexceeding2millionunitsin2005,housingstartsfellto554,000unitsin2009and(asprojected)619,000unitsin2010(fig.9.16),comparedtolowsthathadnotdippedbelow1millionfrom1959to2007.

TheCongressionalBudgetOfficehasconstructedalternativeforecastsofconstructionactivityrecoveryfromthecurrenthousingtroughthatincorporateexistinghousingstocks,populationgrowth,householdformation,depreciation,andemployment.Theforecastspredictedthathousingstartscouldreturntobetween1.2and1.5millionunitsby2012(CongressionalBudgetOffice2008),atrendthatlongertermforecastspredictedwouldcontinue.Fromtheperspectiveofalongrunanalysis,thisforecastedstabilitysuggestsrecoveryandsubsequentstabilityindemandforsolidwoodproductsusedinconstruction.Inaddition,theexpansionintheoverallnumberandageofexistingresidencesmaybringincreasedupkeepandrepairs,stimulatingagradualexpansionindemandforwood.

MorerecentdataindicatethattherecoveryofconstructionactivityprojectedbytheCongressionalBudgetOfficehasyettoberealized.InMarch2011,theU.S.CensusBureau(2011)estimatednewprivatehousingstartsataseasonallyadjusted479,000units,considerablylowerthanthehousingstartsrecordedin2009and2010.Thetime-pathofarecoveryinhousinginfluencesthefutureofsolidwoodproductsdemand.Withasustainedsuppressionofhousingdemand,solidwoodprocessingwouldlikelyshrink,eventuallyresultinginstructuralchangesinthesemarkets.Althoughnecessarilydifficulttopredict,theimplicationsofsustainedsuppressionmightincludesustaineddeclinesinproduction

203chAPTeR 9. Markets

definesaceilingfordomestichardwoodstumpagepricesincertainareasoftheSouth.

Fromthebeginningofthedataseries(1989)to2002,theUnitedStateshashadalargetradesurplusinwoodchips(fig.9.22)—withexportsfarexceedingimports.Since1999,however,thetradesurplushasfallensteadily,fromaround3milliontonsinthemid-1990stolessthan0.1milliontonsin2003.From1991to2002,nearlyallofthewoodchipsexportedfromU.S.southernportswereshippedtoJapan.

By2002,chipexportsfromsouthernportsessentiallyceased.In2003,thereductioninsouthernchipexports—primarilyhardwoodchips—toJapanwasequivalentto5percentoftotalsouthernpulpwoodproductionandnearly16percentofsouthernhardwoodpulpwoodproduction.WithmostofthetradeinwoodchipsmovingthroughMobile,wemightexpecttheeconomicimpactsofreduceddemandtobestrongestinAlabamaandtodeclineinanoutwardradiatingpattern.

Lumber—Sincethelate1980s,theUnitedStateshasbeenalargenetimporterofsoftwoodlumber,primarilyfromCanada(fig.9.23).LumberimportsfromSouthAmerica,althoughrelativelysmallfrom1989to2004,havebeenrisingsteadily.AlthoughtheUnitedStatesexportssomelumber,thebalanceoftradefavorsimports,andthetradedeficitisgrowing.

ImportsoflumberfromCanadahaveanimportantinfluenceonallU.S.timbermarkets,buttheeffectsonsouthernmarketsarelikelytobeindirect.LumberfromWesternCanadamoredirectlysubstitutesforlumberofspeciesthatgrowintheWesternUnitedStates(Nagubadiandothers2004),andimportsaregenerallynotdirectlysubstitutableforthetreatedlumberproducedintheSouth.

In2004,theUnitedStatesledallothertemperatecountriesinproducing(60percent)andconsuming(52percent)hardwoodlumber,withabout8percentofdomesticproductionexported.Hardwoodlumberisamuchmoreheterogeneouscommoditythansoftwoodlumber,soitsproductionandtradeservesawidevarietyofenduses—fromflooringtofurnituretoshippingpallets—andaggregatedataprovideonlyaverygeneraldescriptionoftrends.Notethatabout10percentofU.S.hardwoodexportsarefromthePacificNorthwest(especiallyredalder)comparedtoabout90percentfromtheEasternUnitedStates.

ExportsofhardwoodlumberfromtheSouthincreasedfromabout0.4millionm3in1989tojustover1.2millionm3in2004(fig.9.23)—mostlytootherNorthAmericancountries,followedbyEastAsiaandthe27countriesoftheEuropeanUnion(seefig.9.24),andwithabout10percentgoingtoallothercountriescombined.Thedistributionofexports

amongthesedestinationshaschangedsomewhatsince1989,withshipmentstoEuropedecliningandshipmentstootherCanadaandMexicoincreasingsubstantially(fig.9.24).ShipmentstoEastAsiahavebeenessentiallyconstantinaggregate,withachangingmixofindividualcountrydestinationsandlargeincreasesinshipmentstoChinaoffsetbydecreasesinshipmentstootherAsiancountries.The2007recessionledtoastrongdeclineintotalhardwoodexportswiththedistributionamongdestinationsremainingrelativelyconstant(fig.9.24).

Southernexportsofsoftwoodlumberhavebeenrelativelysmallandhavedeclinedoverthelastdecade(fig.9.25),fallingtoaboutathirdof1992levelsin2004andnowrepresentingonly1to2percentoftotalproduction.

Panels—Tradeinpanelproductsisweightedtowardimports,withabout15percentofplywoodconsumptionand38percentoforientedstrandboardconsumptionimportedfromCanadaandothercountriesin1999(Spelter2001).Particleboard,waferboard,andorientedstrandboardimportsfromCanadagrewstronglythroughthemid-2000s,increasingfrom$1.53billionin1999to$3.16billionin2004,beforedecreasingsubstantiallyattheendofthedecade(APA-TheEngineeredWoodAssociation2010)U.S.exportsofpanelscannotbeconsiderednegligible,althoughtheyaresubstantiallylowerthanimports.Forexample,in2009,plywoodexportswere482millionsquarefeet(3/8-inchbasis)comparedto616millionsquarefeetforimports.Orientedstrandboardtradehasbeensignificantlymoreimbalanced,tiltedtowardimports(APA-TheEngineeredWoodAssociation2010).

Orientedstrandboardmarketsexpandedthroughthemid-2000s.NorthAmericawilllikelycontinuetodominateWorldproductioninthiscommodityclass,butthetradebalancewithinNorthAmerica—especiallybetweenCanadaandtheUnitedStates—couldchangewithmarketexpansion.Inaddition,adeclineindemandforsouthernpulpwoodcouldofferacompetitivemill-sitingadvantagetoU.S.manufacturers.

Overall,weseenodramaticchangeininternationalmarketsthatwouldstronglyaffectsoutherntimberdemandintheshortrun.Atthenationallevel,thevalueofwoodproductsimportsexceedsexportssothewoodproductsbalanceoftradeisnegative.Forsouthernports,thewoodproductsbalanceoftradeispositive,butasmallshareoftotalproduction.

Timber Supply Trends

Overall,changesduringtheadjustmentphase(1997to2009)indicatesomeimportantchangesinsupply.Anexpandedsupplyofsoftwoodpulpwoodtimbercoupledwith

211chAPTeR 9. Markets

forestsstillinproductionbutwithaverydifferentsetofowners.Forecastsoftheimpactsofthisownershipchangeoninvestmentcanonlybespeculativeatthispoint,butwillplayanimportantpartindeterminingfuturesupply.

Forecastsofsupplyindicateasubstantialexpansioninsoftwoodsupplyoverthenextdecadeasnewpineplantationsmature.Thisportendscontinuedlowpricesforsoftwoodproducts,especiallysoftwoodpulpwood.Beyond2020,supplydependsonamuchlowerrateofexpansioninforestplantations—generallytherateofplantingharvestedforestsisassumedtobeabouthalfofwhatitwasinthe1990s.Evenattheseloweredlevels,thesupplyoftimberwouldgrowandthepriceofproductswouldgenerallydeclineifdemanddoesnotgrowoverthenextdecades.Whilesupplygrowthcouldalsobeaffectedbypolicychangesaffectingfuturemanagementoptions—e.g.,potentialrestrictionsontheuseofherbicidesforsitepreparation—ouranalysisfocusesonafuturewithnosubstantialchangesinpolicyenvironment.Policychangescouldleadtodifferentoutcomes.

GrowthinharvestingcanbesupportedbytheforestlandoftheSouth.Areturnto1990sdemandlevelswouldresultinapricestabilizationforsoftwoodpulpwoodpricesandanincreaseoflessthan1percentperyearforsoftwoodsawtimberandhardwoodpulpwood,aswellasanincreaseintotaloutputofabout40percentfrom2006to2055.If,inaddition,productivityinpineplantationsgrowsby50percent,thenoutputcouldincreaseevenmoresubstantially—upto70percentforsoftwoodpulpwood.

Demandisperhapsthemostcrucialuncertaintyinthisanalysis.Currentdemandissuppressedbytheunprecedentedfallinhousingconstructionin2008,andbylongrunphenomena,suchasthedeclineinpaperproductioncapacityintheSouthinlinewithbroadereconomy-wideshiftsthatareimpactingthetimberproductsindustryandglobalcapacityshifts.Recoveryfromthe2007recessionwillstronglyaffectthecourseoffuturedemand,butpolicydevelopmentsmayalsoplayarole.IncentivesforusingrenewablebiomassinvariousbioenergyoperationscouldprovideapotentiallylargenewdemandfortimberproductsintheSouth(chapter10).

Whatisclearfromouranalysisisthat,absentrenewedgrowthindemandfortraditionalsouthernforestproducts,productiongrowthcouldbesustainedinsupportofnewmarketswithoutsubstantialincreasesontimberprices,althoughregionalstabilitycouldcoincidewithimportantscarcitiesinlocaltimbermarkets,forexampleifsomeindividualStatesdeveloptheirownRenewablePortfolioStandards.Thequestionthatremainsis,“Howmuch?”Withoutproductivitygains,thelargestprojectionsofdemandforwood-basedbioenergyproducts(understrongeconomicandmoderatepopulationgrowthprojections

ofCornerstonesAandB,andtheA1Bstorylineinthe2010RPAAssessment)outlinedbytheU.S.DepartmentofEnergyanddescribedinchapter10wouldleadtolargepriceincreases(asmuchas400percentby2055).Withthe50-percentproductivitygrowthforplantations,thisdemandcouldmorereadilybeaccommodatedwithoutstrongpriceincreases,evenwithexistingindustriesconsumingtheircurrentlevelsoftimberproducts.UndertheExpandingDemandscenarioandholdingpulpwoodconsumptionforexistingindustriesat2006levels,anadditional2.4billioncubicfeetor36.6milliongreentonsperyearofsoftwoodpulpwoodharvestingareforecastedfor2055.CombiningEnhancedProductivitytotheabovescenariowouldincreasesoftwoodpulpwoodharvestingto3.7billioncubicfeetor57.9milliongreentonsperyear.

Insummary,theSouthhasthecapacitytoexpandproductionwellintothiscentury,butdemandforforestproductsseemstobealimitingfactor.Timbersupplyhascontinuedtogrowwhiledemandhasslackenedoverthepastdecade,inducingdisinvestmentinpulpandpapermanufacturingandslowerinvestmentinotherwoodproductsbytheforestproductsindustry.Giventhisreality,thefutureoftimbermarketswilllargelybedeterminedbydemandgrowththatwouldemergeprimarilyfromtherequirementsofforestfiberinputstosupplybio-basedenergy.

kNoWleDGe AND iNFoRmATioN GAPS

Ourmarketmodelsarebased,totheextentpossible,onempiricalmodelsofbiologicalchangesandmanagementbehavior.Oneareawhereempiricalmodelshavenotprovedsufficientisinforestinvestments.Betterinformationonhowvariousownerandinvestorgroupsadjusttheirmanagementplans,particularlybyexpandingtreeplantinginresponsetomarketsignals,couldreducetheuncertaintyofmarketprojections.Bettermodelsofthedemandforfinalwoodproductsandtimberinputstotheirproductioncouldalsoimprovemarketprojections.

Changeintheownershipofforestsisanotherkeysourceofuncertainty.Giventheinformationathand,weassumethatthemanagementobjectivesandmanagementmodelsoftimberinvestmentmanagementorganizationsaresimilartothoseoftheverticallyintegratedforestproductscompaniesthattheyhavereplacedoverthepast10years(chapter6).Littleisknownaboutthebroaderimplicationsofthesechangesinownershipandassociatedchangesinmanagementstrategiesforthelandthathasbeentransferred.Forexample,theproductivityofplantedforestsderivesfromothertreatments,includingfertilization,weedcontrol,andthinningwhichhavenotbeenmodeledhere.Wehaveassumedthatmanagementstrategieshavenotbeengreatlyimpactedbythesechanges,butthisremainsanuntestedhypothesis.

212The Southern Forest Futures Project

Pastattemptstomodelsoutherntimbermarketshavebeensuccessfulbecauseofthedominanceofprivateowners.Ourmodelsindicatethatforestharvestingcanbemodeledasafunctionofmarketsignalsandisthereforepredictable.However,animportantuncertaintymaywellbethedevelopmentofnewdemandsforbioenergyandbiofuelsthataredriven,notbymarkets,butbynewStateandFederalpolicies,whichareunknowableatthispoint.Inaddition,thespatialscopeofourmodelsaddressestheregion’stimbermarketsasoneentity,giventhecurrentdistributionofproductiondemandsandforestmanagementtypes.However,policiesattheStatelevel,especiallyStateRenewablePortfolioStandards,maycreatelocaldemandsthatcouldresultinlocalscarcitiesandaspatialrealignmentofproduction;thesewecannotaddresswithourmodels.

AckNoWleDGmeNTS

ThankstoShanLiu,SouthernResearchStation,U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService;RuhongLi,DepartmentofForestryandManagement,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison;andRobertC.Abt,DepartmentofForestryandEnvironmentalResources,NorthCarolinaStateUniversity.

liTeRATuRe ciTeD

APA-theEngineeredWoodAssociation.2010.Structuralpaneland engineeredwoodyearbook.APAEconomicsReportE176.Tacoma,WA:AmericanPlywoodAssociation.80p.

CongressionalBudgetOffice.2008.Theoutlookforhousingstarts,2009to2012.BackgroundPaper.U.S.Congress,CongressionalBudgetOffice.23p.http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/98xx/doc9885/11-17-HousingStarts.pdf.[Dateaccessed:October28,2010].

Daniels,J.M.2008.UnitedStatestradeinwoodproducts,1978–2005.Gen.Tech.Rep.PNW-GTR-738.Portland,OR:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,PacificNorthwestResearchStation.124p.

Fleishman,S.J.;Eastin,I.L.;Shook,S.R.1999.Materialsubstitutiontrendsinresidentialconstruction,1995vs.1998.CenterforInternationalTradeinForestProductsWorkingPaperNumber73.Seattle:UniversityofWashington.76p.

Ince,P.2000.IndustrialwoodproductivityintheUnitedStates,1900-1998.Res.NoteFPL-RN-0272.Madison,WI:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,ForestProductsLaboratory.14p.

Johnson,T.G.;Steppleton,C.D.2005.Southernpulpwoodproduction,2003.Resour.Bull.SRS-101.Asheville,NC:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,SouthernResearchStation.38p.

Johnson,T.G.;Steppleton,C.D.;Bentley,J.W.2010.Southernpulpwoodproduction,2008.Resour.Bull.SRS–165.Asheville,NC:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,SouthernResearchStation.42p.

McKeand,S.;Mullin,T.;Byram,T.;White,T.2003.Deploymentof geneticallyimprovedloblollyandslashpinesintheSouth.JournalofForestry.101(3):32-37.

McKeever,T.;Spelter,H.1998.Wood-basedpanelplantlocationsandtimberavailabilityinselectedU.S.States.Gen.Tech.Rep.FPL-GTR-103.Madison,WI:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,ForestProductsLaboratory.53p.

Nagubadi,R.;Zhang,D.;Prestemon,J.;Wear,D.N.2004.SoftwoodlumberproductsintheUnitedStates:substitutes,complements,orunrelated?ForestScience.50(4):416-426.

NorrisFoundation.1977–present.TimberMart-SouthStateTimberPriceReports.CenterforForestBusiness,WarnellSchoolofForestryandNaturalResources,UniversityofGeorgia,Athens,GA.

Poylakov,M.;Wear,D.N.;Huggett,R.2010.Harvestchoiceandtimbersupplymodelsforforestforecasting.ForestScience.56(4):344-355.

Smith,B.R.;Rice,R.W.;Ince,P.J.2003.PulpcapacityintheUnitedStates,2000.Gen.Tech.Rep.FPL–GTR–139.Madison,WI:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,ForestProductsLaboratory.23p.

Smith,W.B.;Miles,P.D.;Perry,C.H.;Pugh,S.A.2009.ForestresourcesoftheUnitedStates,2007.Gen.Tech.Rep.WO-78.Washington,DC:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService.336p.

Smith,W.B.;Miles,P.D.;Vissage,J.S.;Pugh,S.A.2004.ForestresourcesoftheUnitedStates,2002.Gen.Tech.Rep.NC-241.St.Paul,MN:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,NorthCentralResearchStation.137p.

Smith,W.B.;Vissage,J.S.;Darr,D.R.;Sheffield,R.M.2001.ForestresourcesoftheUnitedStates,1997.Gen.Tech.Rep.NC-219.St.Paul,MN:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,NorthCentralResearchStation.190p.

Spelter,H.2001.Wood-basedpanels—supply,tradeandconsumption.In:ECE/FAOForestProductsAnnualMarketReview1999-2000:113-130.Chapter10.

Spelter,H.;McKeever,D.;Toth,D.2009.Profile2009:softwoodsawmillsintheUnitedStatesandCanada.Res.Pap.FPL-RP-659.Madison,WI:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,ForestProductsLaboratory.55p.

U.S.CensusBureau.2011.Pressrelease:newresidentialconstructioninFebruary2011.March16,2011.http://www.census.gov/const/www/newresconstindex.html.[Dateaccessed:April5,2011].

Uusivuori,J.;Buongiorno,J.1991.PassthroughofexchangeratesonpricesofforestproductexportsfromtheUnitedStatestoEuropeandJapan.ForestScience.37(3):931-948.

Wear,D.N.;Carter,D.R.;Prestemon,J.2007.TheU.S.South’stimbersectorin2005:aprospectiveanalysisofrecentchange.Gen.Tech.Rep.SRS-99.Asheville,NC:U.S.DepartmentofAgricultureForestService,SouthernResearchStation.29p.

Zhang,Y.;Buongiorno,J.1998.Paperorplastic?TheUnitedStates’demandforpaperandpaperboardpackaging.ScandinavianJournalofForestResearch.13:54-65.

Zhang,Y.;Buongiorno,J.1997.CommunicationmediaanddemandforprintingandpublishingpapersintheUnitedStates.ForestScience.43(3):362-377.