Upload
camilo-abogado
View
32
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1CHAPTER II
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
The preceding chapter presented an exposition of the methodology of the study.
This chapter presents, analyzes, and interprets the data gathered from the twenty Help
Desk Users and Staff. The findings of the study are shown in twelve tables and they will
be used as the basis in preparing proposals for improvement of the Help Desk Section.
This chapter covers two sections. Section 1 discusses the functionality of the
Bureau of Internal Revenue Revenue Data Center - Visayas as assessed by the Help Desk
Users and Staff.
Section 2 discusses the problems regarding the operations of Help Desk Section.
In this section, tables are presented which shows the rank of the problems that affects the
operations as viewed by the Help Desk Staff.
Section 1
Functionality of Help Desk Section
This section presents, analyze, and interprets the assessment of the functionality
of Revenue Data Center – Visayas Help Desk Section in the following aspects: 1)
Reporting of issues, 2) Providing Resolution, 3) Processing issues logged, 4) Problem
solving procedures, and 5) Strategies in addressing the problem. The weighted mean and
its corresponding interpretation are reflected in the tables.
Page 1
2Functionality Of Help Desk Section In Encouraging The User To Report Issues Using Different Methods
The data regarding the functionality of Help Desk Section in encouraging the user
to report issues using different methods is presented in table 2.
The factor average of 3.26 derived from the group average of 3.52 from the users
and 2.99 from the staff shows that Help Desk Section functionality on reporting issues
was Moderately Functional.
Table 2Functionality of Help Desk in Encouraging Users
to Report Issues using Different MethodsN=20
FunctionalityUsern=14
Staffn=6
Item Average
Scale Scale ScaleReporting the issue using help desk form 4.2 F 4.00 F 4.10 FReporting the issue using telephone 3.42 F 2.16 LF 2.79 MFReporting the issue using e-mail 2.92 MF 2.00 LF 2.46 LFReporting the issue by personally going to the help desk area 3.57 F 3.83 F 3.70 F
Factor Average 3.52 F 2.99 MF 3.26 MF
Legend: 4.01 - 5.00 - Very Functional (VF)3.41 – 4.20 - Functional (F)2.61 – 3.40 - Moderately Functional (MF)1.81 – 2.60 - Less Functional (LF)1.00 – 1.80 - Not Functional (NF)
The functionality of the Help Desk Section in reporting the issue using help desk
form was responsive in majority of the situation as shown by the item average of 4.1
derived from the weighted mean of 4.2 from the users and 4.0 from the staff. The item
average of 2.79 taken from the weighted mean of 3.42 from the users and 2.16 from the
Page 2
3staff indicates that reporting the issue using the telephone is Moderately Functional. As
shown by the item average of 2.46 taken from the weighted mean of 2.92 derived from
the user and 2.00 derived form the staff revealed that the functionality of reporting the
issues using the e-mail is responsive on few of the situation. Lastly, it shows that
reporting the issue personally is Functional as indicated by the weighted mean of 3.56 of
the users and 3.83 of the staff.
The findings revealed that the functionality of Help Desk Section of the Revenue
Data Center Visayas is responsive in many of the issues reporting situation. This also
shows that the Help Desk Section Moderately achieve its objectives and goals through
the use of help desk form and personally reporting the issue.
Functionality of the Help Desk Section in Providing Resolution
Table 3 presents data regarding the functionality of the Help Desk Section in
providing resolution. The factor average of 3.54 taken from the 3.67 group average of
users and 3.41 from the staff reveals that the Help Desk Section is responsive in majority
of the situation in providing resolution.
Table 3Functionality of the Help Desk in Providing Resolution
N=20
FunctionalityUsern=14
Staffn=6
Item Average
Scale Scale ScalePerforming preliminary
Page 3
4investigation on issue/problem logged 4.07 F 3.83 F 3.95 FInforming the user to whom the issue is referred 3.35 MF 3.33 MF 3.34 MFGiving reference number to user for issue/problem logged 3.35 F 2.83 MF 3.03 MFConfirming with the user before finally closing a problem 3.92 F 3.66 F 3.79 F
Factor Average 3.62 F 3.62 F 3.62 FLegend:
4.01 - 5.00 - Very Functional (VF)3.41 – 4.20 - Functional (F)2.61 – 3.40 - Moderately Functional (MF)1.81 – 2.60 - Less Functional (LF)1.00 – 1.80 - Not Functional (NF)
Specifically, the item average of 3.95 taken from the weighted mean of 4.07 of
the users and 3.83 from the staff reveals that the Help Desk Section is Functional in
performing preliminary investigation on issue/problem logged. As presented by the item
average of 3.34 derived form the weighted mean of 3.35 from the users and 3.33 from
the staff, the Help Desk Section’s functionality on informing the user to whom the issue
is referred is Moderately Functional. Also, in giving reference number to user, the Help
Desk Section is responsive in many of the situation as shown by the item average of 3.03
taken from the weighted mean of 3.35 of the users and 2.83 from the staff. As shown by
the item average of 3.79 taken from the weighted mean of 3.92 of the users and 3.66 of
the staff, confirming with user before closing a problem is Functional.
These findings revealed that in majority of the situation, the Help Desk Section in
providing resolution is responsive.
The performance of preliminary investigation and confirming with the user
before closing a problem was Functional. These show that the functionality of Help
Desk Section in providing resolution is essential in the achievement of its goals.
Page 4
5
Functionality of the Help Desk in Processing Issues Logged
Table 4 contains data regarding the functionality of Help Desk Section in
processing issues logged. The factor average of 3.62 based on the group average of 3.62
from the users and 3.62 from the staff reveals that the processing of issues logged is
functional.
Informing that the problem has been logged and the trouble ticket is created is
Functional as shown by the item average of 3.55 taken from the weighted mean of 3.78
of the users and 3.33 of the staff. Furthermore, classifying the issue according to severity
and priority with an item average of 3.86 derived from the weighted mean of 3.57 of the
users and 4.16 of the staff is Functional and is responsive in majority of the situation and
responsive in majority of the situation. As shown by the item average of 3.77 taken from
the users weighted mean of 3.71 and staff’s 3.83 notifying the user of the status of the
issue is functional and is responsive in majority of the situation. Lastly, giving
information on when the issue will be resolved is Moderately Functional as shown by the
item average of 3.29 derived from the weighted mean of 3.42 from the users and 3.16
from the staff.
Table 4Functionality of Help Desk Section in Processing Issues Logged
N=20
FunctionalityUsern=14
Staffn=6
Item Average
Scale Scale ScaleInforming the user that the problem has been logged and trouble ticket is created 3.78 F 3.33 MF 3.55 MFClassifying the issue according to
Page 5
6severity and priority 3.57 F 4.16 F 3.86 FNotifying the user on the status of the issue 3.71 F 3.83 F 3.77 FGiving the user information on when the issue will be resolved 3.42 F 3.16 MF 3.29 MF
Factor Average 3.62 F 3.62 F 3.62 FLegend:
4.01 - 5.00 - Very Functional (VF)3.41 – 4.20 - Functional (F)2.61 – 3.40 - Moderately Functional (MF)1.81 – 2.60 - Less Functional (LF)1.00 – 1.80 - Not Functional (NF)
Generally, in processing issues logged, the Help Desk Section is Functional and is
able to achieve its objectives in majority of situation in informing the user that the
problem has been logged and trouble ticket is created, classifying the issue according to
severity and priority and notifying the user of the status of the issue.
Functionality of the Help Desk in its Problem – Solving Procedures
Table 5 shows the functionality of Help Desk Section in problem solving
procedures. The factor average of 3.07 taken from the group average of 3.15 of users
and 2.99 of the staff was Moderately Functional.
Table 5Functionality of Help Desk Section in Problem Solving Procedures
N=20
FunctionalityUsern=14
Staffn=6
Item Average
Scale Scale ScaleProviding materials and reference so that procedures are 3.07 F 3.0 MF 3.03 MF
Page 6
7understoodPresenting new ideas in order to simplify the procedures 3.05 F 3.16 MF 3.33 MFEncouraging the user in giving suggestions to improve the procedures 3.14 MF 2.66 MF 2.9 MFProviding technology trend updates on help desk procedures 2.92 MF 3.16 MF 3.04 MF
Factor Average 3.15 MF 2.99 MF 3.07 MFLegend:
4.01 - 5.00 - Very Functional (VF)3.41 – 4.20 - Functional (F)2.61 – 3.40 - Moderately Functional (MF)1.81 – 2.60 - Less Functional (LF)1.00 – 1.80 - Not Functional (NF)
Specifically, the item average of 3.03 based on the weighted mean of 3.07 from
the users and 3.0 from the staff reveals that providing materials and reference so that
procedures are understood are Moderately Functional. As shown by the item average of
3.33 derived from the users and 3.16 from the staff. Presenting new ideas to simplify the
procedures are responsive in many of the situation.
The functionality on encouraging the user in giving suggestions to improve the
procedures is Moderately Functional as revealed by the item average of 2.90 based on the
weighted mean of 3.15 from the users and 2.66 from the staff. In addition, the factor
average of 3.04 based on the weighted mean of 2.92 from the users and 3.16 from the
staff presented a Moderately Functional Help Desk Section in providing technology trend
updates on help desk procedures.
From this finding, it can be inferred that the functionality of the Help Desk
Section regarding the problem solving procedures is responsive in many situations. The
Help Desk Section, in order to attain its objectives provides materials and references,
Page 7
8presents new ideas encourage the user in giving suggestions and providing technology
trends update.
Functionality in the Strategies of the Help Desk in Addressing the Problem
Table 6 presents the functionality in the strategies of Help Desk Section in
addressing the problem.
The factor average of 2.79 based on the group average of 3.17 from the users and
2.74 from the staff shows that the functionality in the strategies of Help Desk Section in
addressing the problem is Moderately Functional.
Specifically, as presented by the item average of 3.45 derived from the weighted
mean of 3.57 from the users and 3.33 from the staff reveals that the Help Desk Section
was Functional in analyzing issue/problem as done through group effort by the help desk
attendant/analyst, Problem Resolution Group members and users. The functionality of
the reporting of the status of issue/problem is done consistently through the use of
Paradigm Software is Moderately Functional as shown in the item average of 3.25 based
on the weighted mean of 3.35 from the users and 3.16 from the staff. Another
functionality that is responsive in many of the situations is the new procedures for
resolving problem is presented, discussed and implemented through the briefing and
training as revealed by the item average of 2.82 base on the weighted mean of 3.14 from
the users and 2.5 from the staff. The functionality on the information on the previously
resolved issues is published in bulletin is less functional as reveals by the item average of
2.32 based on the weighted mean of 2.64 from the users and 2.0 from the staff.
Table 6Functionality in the Strategies of the Help Desk in Addressing the Problem
N=20
Page 8
9
FunctionalityUsern=14
Staffn=6
Item Average
Scale Scale ScaleAnalysis of the issue/problem is done through group effort by the help desk attendant/analyst, problem resolution group member and the User 3.57 F 3.33 MF 3.45 FReporting of the status of issue/problem is done consistently though the Use of Paradigm software 3.35 MF 3.16 MF 3.25 MFInformation on previously resolved issues is published in a bulletin 2.64 MF 2.00 LF 2.32 LFNew procedure for resolving problem is presented, discussed and Implemented through briefing and training 3.14 MF 2.50 LF 2.82 MF
Factor Average 3.17 MF 2.74 MF 2.96 MF
Legend: 4.01 - 5.00 - Very Functional (VF)3.41 – 4.20 - Functional (F)2.61 – 3.40 - Moderately Functional (MF)1.81 – 2.60 - Less Functional (LF)1.00 – 1.80 - Not Functional (NF)
Summarized Data on the Functionality of Help Desk Section
The summarized data on the functionality of BIR Revenue Data Center – Visayas
Help Desk Section are presented in Table 7.
Table 7Summarized Data on the Functionality of Help Desk Section
N=20
FunctionalityUsern=14
Staffn=6
Item Average
Scale Scale ScaleFunctionality of in Encouraging Users to Report Issues using Different Methods
3.52 F 2.99 MF 3.26 MFFunctionality of the in Providing Resolution 3.62 F 3.62 F 3.62 FFunctionality of in Processing Issues Logged 3.62 F 3.62 F 3.62 FFunctionality of in Problem Solving
Page 9
10Procedures 3.15 MF 2.99 MF 3.07 MFFunctionality in the Strategies of the in Addressing the Problem 3.17 MF 2.74 MF 2.96 MF
Factor Average 3.41 F 3.19 MF 3.29 MFLegend:
4.01 - 5.00 - Very Functional (VF)3.41 – 4.20 - Functional (F)2.61 – 3.40 - Moderately Functional (MF)1.81 – 2.60 - Less Functional (LF)1.00 – 1.80 - Not Functional (NF)
The data show that the functionality of Help Desk Section is Moderately
Functional as revealed by the general average of 3.29 based on the group general average
of 3.43 from the users and 3.15 from the staff. Specifically, the reporting of issues was
Moderately Functional as revealed by the factor average of 3.26 based on the group
average of 3.53 from the users and 2.99 from the staff. The factor average of 3.54 based
on the group average of 3.67 from the users and 3.41 from the staff showed that
providing resolution is functional. Another Functional features of Help Desk Section is
the processing of issues as presented by the factor average of 3.62 based on the group
average of 3.62 from the user and 3.62 from the staff. As shown by the factor average of
3.07 derived from the group average of 3.15 from the users and 2.99 from the staff
reveals that the problem solving procedure is Moderately Functional. Furthermore, the
strategies in addressing the problem is deemed to be Moderately Functional as signify by
the factor average of 2.96 based on the group average of 3.17 for the users and 2.74 from
the staff.
These findings revealed that the functionality of the Help Desk Section is
responsive in many of the situation and in the manner that Help Desk Section could
attain its objectives.
Page 10
11Section 2
Problems Regarding the Operations of the Revenue Data Center – Visayas Help Desk Section
This study is focused on determining the problems met by the Staff in the
operations of the Revenue Data Center – Visayas Help Desk Section. At this point, only
the staff of the section were made to answer the questions pertaining to the problems in
the operations. The user could no longer provide this researcher with data on the
problems. Only those involve in the operations of the Revenue Data Center – Visayas
Help Desk Section could answer the questions. Hence, there are six respondents in this
portion of the study. The questions are of multiple response type.
Problems of Help Desk Regarding the Reporting of Issue/Problem
Table 8 contains data regarding the problems met by the staff pertaining to the
reporting of issue/ problem.
As shown in the table, the majority, ranging from 66.66 to 100 percent cited three
problems in connection with method of reporting the problem. Foremost among the
problems was the issue/problem submitted for resolution is unclear as expressed by all
the staff representing 100 percent.
Table 8Problems of Help Desk Regarding the Reporting of Issue/Problem
N=6Problems F % Rank
Issue/problem submitted for resolution is unclear 6 100 1E-mail form is not user friendly 5 83.33 2Lack of exclusive telephone units and fax machine for receiving issue/problem 4 66.66 3Absence of receiving area to entertain the user and other help desk clients 2 33.33 4
Page 11
12Ranked second was the e-mail is not user-friendly as revealed by the 5 staff or
83.33 percent. Four staff or 66.66 percent cited that the lack of exclusive telephone units
and fax machine for receiving issue/problems was a problem (Ranked 3).
These findings disclosed that the staff met problems caused either by the users
and the facilities of the Help Desk Section. Among these is the lack of receiving area to
entertain the user and other help desk clients.
Problems of Help Desk Regarding Providing Resolution
Table 9 contains data pertaining to the problems regarding the Help Desk Section providing of resolution.
Table 9Problems of Help Desk Regarding Providing Resolution
N=6Problems F % Rank
Preliminary investigation cannot be perform due to lack of access to the integrated tax system database
6 100 1
Lack of standard reference number for identifying issues for resolution 4 66.66
2
Issue/problem cannot be confirm immediately due to users lack of time to review the resolution 3 50 3Preliminary investigation cannot be perform due to lack of knowledge of integrated tax system technical architecture 2 33.33 4Cannot locate the user to inform whom the issue is referred
1 16.66 5
Page 12
13Three major problems were cited by majority of respondents. Ranked first was a
problem identified by all the respondents or 100 percent who revealed that preliminary
investigation cannot be performed due to lack of access of the integrated tax system
database. There were 4 respondents comprising 66.66 percent who cited problem on the
lack of standard reference number for identifying issues for resolution. As revealed by 3
respondents or 50 percent of the respondents, issue/problem could not be confirm
immediately due to user lack of time to review the resolution.
These findings showed that limiting the role of help desk staff to just receiving
the issue/problem and not giving privilege to analyze the affected record in the database
results to non-investigation and delay in providing resolution.
The lack of standard reference number for identifying issues for resolution is one
of the major problems. The staff is confused on the use of reference numbers since there
are two numbers used in providing resolution. The use of two numbers contributed to
greater time in providing resolution.
Problems of Help Desk Section Regarding the Processing of Issues Logged
Table 10 contains the problems regarding the processing of issues logged.
Table 10Problems Regarding the Processing of Issues Logged
N=6
Problems F % RankLack of notification tools for the user 6 100 1There are no procedure and guidelines on classifying issue according to severity 5 83.33
2
There are no procedure and guidelines on classifying issue according to priority 3 50 3Lack of interest of user in following-up of issue 1 16.66 4
Page 13
14The majority of the respondents cited three problems that have been met by the
staff in relation with the processing of issues of logged. Six of the staff representing 100
percent cited the lack of notification tools for the user (Ranked 1). There are no
procedures and guidelines on classifying issue according to severity were revealed by 5
respondents or 83.33 percent. Three of the respondents or 50 percent cited that there are
no procedures and guidelines or classifying issue according to priority.
Findings show that the notification tools for user are important in the processing
of issues logged. The lack of it gives the staff a larger time to inform the user on the
status of the processing of issues logged.
Problems of Help Desk Section Regarding the Problem Solving Procedures
Table 11 contains the data regarding the problem solving procedures.
Table 11Problems of Help Desk Section Regarding the Problem Solving Procedures
N=6Problems F % Rank
Lack of Operations Manual 6 100 1Lack of feed back mechanism to improve problem solving procedure 5 83.33
2
Lack of update bulletin/trends update to inform the staff of the help desk industry changes and development. 2 33.33 3Information Handbook is inadequate to support problem solving complex issues 1 16.66 4
The data show that the majority of the staff cited two problems in connection
with the problem solving procedures. These problems were the lack of operations
manual as cited by 6 respondents or 100 percent and lack of feedback mechanism to
improve the problem solving procedure as revealed by 5 respondents or 83.33 percent.
Page 14
15
Problems of Help Desk Section regarding the Strategies of Help Desk in Addressing the Problem
Table 12 presents the data on the problems of Help Desk Section regarding the strategies of Help Desk in addressing the problem.
Table 12Problems of Help Desk Section regarding the Strategies of
Help Desk in Addressing the ProblemN=6
Problems F % RankLack of back-up database for Paradigm software in case of major system shutdown 6 100 1Inability to utilize the Internet as a tool for issue/problem Resolution 5 83.33 2Help Desk bulletin is not regularly published 4 66.66 3Lack of centralized information dissemination system in
the development of Help Desk process flows and procedures
1 16.66 4
Three major problems were cited by majority of the respondents. Ranked first
was a problem cited by all of the staff or 100 percent. Who revealed that lack of back-up
database for Paradigm software in remote site in case of major system shutdown. There
were 5 respondents or 83.33 percent identified the inability to utilize the intranet/internet
as a tool for issue/problem resolution (Ranked 2). Ranked third is help desk bulletin is
not regularly published that accounts for 4 respondents or 66.66 percent.
Page 15
16These findings reveals that support facilities are the major concerns in the
operation of help desk. The lack of it will affect the strategies of help desk in addressing
the problem. The process of regularly publishing the help desk bulletin is also cited as
one of the major problems. Consistent publishing of bulletin will further increase call
avoidance.
This chapter presented, analyzed and interpreted the data, the succeeding chapter presents
measure to improve the Help Desk Section of the Bureau of Internal Revenue Revenue
Data Center – Visayas.
Page 16