Upload
hoangque
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Characterisation of a Wireless Passive Surface Acoustic Wave Strain Sensor
Rory Stoney
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
Trinity College Dublin
Abstract
Wirelessly interrogated surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors can operate passively and in harsh
conditions reliably. The interrogation process of the signal measurement chain provides the power
to excite the sensor and hence establish the sensors response in a passive manner. Development of
wireless passive SAW sensors allows investigation of their potential to quantify physical
measurands such as strain in aggressive environments. Wireless SAW strain measurement is
shown to be advantageous over wired strain measurement alternatives where instrumentation at the
sensor site can be prohibitive to strain measurement technology integration in certain application
areas. In this paper, a one port SAW resonator (SAWR) strain sensor is presented and is shown to
exhibit highly sensitive and linear responses to applied strain. The principle operation of the
Trinity SAW is outlined and the processes involving the instrumentation of the packaged devices
are discussed. Wireless strain measurement is demonstrated using a packaged SAW device that is
calibrated using the standardised strain testing system developed in-house. The system facilitates a
standardised and repeatable method for testing. This allows for both individual sensor performance
and detailed comparative analysis between test sensors. A range of strain level performance
assessments are presented and cross sensitivity at elevated temperatures is demonstrated and
discussed. The performance of the SAW technology is shown to have equivalent sensitivity
performance when compared to an industry standard strain gauge device. The work presented in
this paper demonstrates the potential for SAW strain sensors to be integrated in real engineering
applications such as process monitoring and tool condition monitoring in the future.
Introduction
Traditionally surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors have been associated with signal processing
applications. In recent years SAW sensors have been developed to provide passive and wireless
measurement of physical measurands such as strain, temperature and pressure in many engineering
applications [1, 2]. SAW devices are highly attractive due to their high performance, small size
and good reproducibility [1, 3]. SAW sensors are also easy to fabricate, small, inexpensive and
respond to physical measurands with high dynamic measurement ranges [4]. SAW sensors have
been shown to operate in very harsh environments [4], such as high voltage power grid switch gear
systems [5], disc brakes [6], tyres [7], rotating machinery [8], electric motors [2] and inside jet
engines [9]. SAW based strain sensors are demonstrated as a potential detection method for broken
or loose fittings in aircraft wing structures [10].
Recently wireless SAW sensors and interrogation systems have become more readily available
[11-13]. As a result SAW sensors have now been integrated into a variety of physical sensing
applications. A SAW sensor has been successfully used to measure blood pressure using a strain
sensitive structure inside a pressure measurement device [3]. Torque measurement is a favoured
application for SAW strain sensors applied to transmission axles [14-16]. SAW strain based
sensors have been used extensively by Transense [17] in automotive applications such as a
contactless torque measurement device developed for use in automotive drivetrain systems and
power steering applications [18] and an in-car tyre pressure monitoring system [7, 19]. Senseor
currently offer a range of SAW sensors for strain temperature and pressure measurement [11].
While SAW devices have been shown to operate successfully as physical sensors their operation
tends to be very application specific. Commercial applications are emerging but the performance
of the SAW sensors and the added complexity of their use in strain measurement applications has
been company specific know how.
Principle of passive wireless SAW strain sensor application
Sensor operating principle
The SAW sensor described in this paper is a one port SAW resonator (SAWR). The sensor is
fabricated on AT-X quartz due to its constant strain sensitivity performance at elevated
temperatures [20]. In a piezoelectric material, such as AT-X quartz, there is an electric field
associated with a propagating SAW on the quartz surface. Metal electrodes specifically located on
the surface can detect this electric field [21]. The electrode setup, known as an interdigital
transducer (IDT) as shown in Figure 1(a), when manufactured on the surface of a polished
piezoelectric substrate, can generate, detect and influence the propagating SAW waves [1, 2]. The
IDT therefore electrically excites a wave which is contained by the two reflective grating strips.
Figure 1(a) shows the layout of the deposited aluminum structures on the SAWR surface. The
magnitude of the SAWR response is maximized when an RF voltage is applied to the IDT at a
frequency ƒc which is related to the surface wave velocity vs and the electrode pitch p by equation 1
[3, 6]:
ƒc = vs/2p (1)
Figure 1(b) demonstrates that applying strain biases will deform the surface features, thus
changing the electrode pitch. The substrate material is exposed to stresses as a result of the applied
strain changing the surface acoustic wave velocities [22]. The result is a SAWR sensors resonant
frequency that changes linearly to the applied strain.
Figure 1: SAW structure schematic and sensor deformation description
Passive wireless operating principle
Wireless SAWR interrogation is carried out using an off the shelf wireless interrogator. A pulsed
interrogation method [23-25] is used to wirelessly monitor the resonant response of the SAW
device. The important advantage is the ability of the sensor to store energy. The sensor can then
operate in isolation without any active part, i.e. without any power supply or oscillators [25]. A
pulsed interrogation procedure is initiated with a RF burst from the interrogator at a specific
frequency and over a given time period. The energy is transmitted via induction through the
antenna connected to the sensor therefore exciting the IDT on the quartz surface (shown in figure
2) and will cause the sensor to “store” energy if the excitation is at the resonant frequency.
Subsequent removal of the RF burst, where the interrogator goes into “listening-mode” causes the
SAW generated to be reconverted back into an RF response signal when the propagating decaying
waves contact the IDT. A typical excitation-response profile is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: A Typical excitation-response profile from a SAW resonator [24]
Analysis of the decaying oscillations in the RF signal enables the interrogation device to evaluate
the resonant frequency. The decaying oscillations will be strongest at the resonant frequency of the
sensor and therefore the signal processing in the interrogation device can be programmed to find
the resonant frequency. In this manner the sensor resonant frequency can be measured wirelessly
and passively.
SAW Instrumentation
Sensor Package Description
The SAWR sensors are located on a diced quartz wafer and are 5mm x 5mm x 0.3 mm in
dimension. The general performance of the SAW devices is summarised in figure 3(a). The
devices are first packaged using off the shelf packages [26]. The package construction is a layered
structure consisting of a kovar base material (ASTM-F15) and alumina/glass sidewalls.
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 3: Packaged SAW device prior to final sealing
The SAW device is adhered to the inside of the package base using an off the shelf strain gauge
epoxy adhesive. The SAW electrical connections are applied using an ultrasonic wire bonding
machine to connect the bond pads to the inside of the package I/O terminals. The package is then
hermetically sealed with a kovar lid and tested using a network analyser to investigate the sensor
S11 response. A PCB is currently used with an SMA connector to connect the network analyser to
the sensor. The I/O pins are soldered to the PCB. Figure 3(c) shows the finally instrumented setup
with the PCB and SMA connector to facilitate the interrogation of the sensor. The packaged
SAWR is then adhered to the final strain substrate with the epoxy adhesive. The manufacturing
process chain to instrument a SAWR sensor for strain measurement is carried out in house
independent of any external collaboration. A successful sensor manufacture results in a S11 plot as
shown in figure 4(a) on the network analyser and has a distinct shift in the peak response when
strain is applied to the substrate the sensor is mounted on. The required response parameters are
summarised in Figure 4(b)
(a) (b)
Figure 4: Sensor S11 response and required response characteristics for strain measurement
Packaging Considerations
The SAW die are very sensitive to contamination and therefore must be handled with extreme care
during the assembly of the packaging. Adhesive quantities need to be monitored such that
sufficient adhesive is used without contaminating the surface of the SAW die. Clamping is
required to maintain a uniform and sufficiently thin bondline between the kovar and quartz
substrate. Cure cycles are carried out as per the adhesive manufacturer’s specifications. Due to the
thermal coefficient mismatch between the kovar, quartz and steel there is a residual stress
generated by the adhesive bond and this creates a frequency offset in the SAW response. During
the testing this offset, while present, did not shift the sensor outside of the 433MHz ISM band.
While the packaging is demonstrated to work there are still improvements needed to standardise
the instrumentation procedure and optimise the sensor’s performance.
SAW Performance Evaluation
Sensor Characterisation System
The packaged sealed sensors are setup on the dedicated calibration system. A strain plate has been
designed with a strain optimised gauge area used for the sensor characterisation. Vishay half
bridge strain gauges with one gauge active in the strain field are used as a reference technology for
performance validation. The strain gauges are instrumented and calibrated with an NI9237 data
acquisition module. The fully instrumented gauge area is shown in figure 5 with two packaged
SAW sensors and two foil strain gauges.
Figure 5: Instrumented strain calibration beam with SAW and strain gauge sensors
The strain plate is setup in the dedicated calibration system to implement the testing procedures
using custom software. Figure 6 shows the system and its components. The actuator, SAW
interrogation unit, strain gauge DAQ and temperature controller have been integrated into the rig
control software. Strain levels, calibration cycles, test temperature and sensor responses are all set
and acquired in a standardised automated manner.
Figure 6: dedicated calibration System for strain response characterisation
Sensor Performance
The sensor range is assessed based on a direct comparison to the Vishay strain gauge instrumented
as per the manufacturer’s recommendations. The sensitivities at very low and very high strains are
investigated and shown in figure 7. The SAW sensor is shown to have a higher signal to noise
ratio than the strain gauge at strain steps as low as 2με. The SAW response shows good correlation
to the strain gauge at the very high strains where the maximum strain level was ~950με
Figure 7: SAW sensitivity assessment
A calibration data set is shown in figure 8. The test implements a cycle of compression and tension
loading conditions of ± 400 με. The test is then repeated at steady state elevated temperatures and
the parameters summarised in table 1. The sensor response is highly linear with very high linear
correlation coefficients. Hysteresis and sensitivities have been shown to be robust and repeatable.
The sensor was further cycled for ~13,500 calibration runs, at room temperature, to investigate the
long term performance. Negligible decreases in the sensitivity were observed and the full scale
frequency response and hysteresis levels remained constant.
Temp Ssen R² FS Hysteresis %
20˚C -477.94 ±12.45 0.99996 0.64
30˚C -478.03± 13.68 0.99995 0.65
40˚C -479.75±16.74 0.99993 0.608
50˚C -479.04±15.68 0.9999 0.63
60 ˚C -477.46±16.84 0.99982 0.75
70˚C -477.11±12.12 0.99976 0.95
80˚C -474.87±23.8 0.99969 1.072
Table 1: Calibration Results [27]
Figure 8: Calibration data set with a zoomed profile demonstrating the cross sensitivity to temperature
SAW Evaluation
This paper has demonstrated the SAW technology operation and has explained how the strain
measurement process can be implemented wirelessly and passively. However, as with
conventional strain gauges, the final performance of the installed gauge is heavily dependent on
the methods adopted during final instrumentation. It is therefore very important to demonstrate the
performance of the finally instrumented sensor. The manufacturing process required to instrument
a SAW device for strain measurement is shown to work and to provide repeatable results. This
process is critical to the sensor performance and is significantly more difficult to implement when
compared to a standard strain gauge. Given the sensor is a stiff section of quartz the surface and
bonding conditions are critical for successful strain transfer to the sensor.
The Sensor performance is shown to exhibit impressive and competitive sensitivities at
very high (950με) and very low strains (2με). The cross sensitivity to temperature is shown in
Figure 8 and can be accounted for. Future work involving two sensors and implementing a
differential measurement response variable to applied strain will reduce the cross sensitivity to
temperature and reduce RF interference.
Conclusion
The wireless passive operation of the SAW strain technology is a key performance advantage for
future applications of the technology. Given the work done to date, the SAW strain sensor
manufacturing process is in a position to be used in an application specific area where real strains
can be measured and used as a monitoring tool directly in real time. Further development in the
understanding of the sensor bonding and the strain transfer to the sensor is required as well as
more extensive long term testing of the sensor performance.
References
[1] Bulst W E, Fischerauer G, and Reindl L, "State of the art in wireless sensing with
surface acoustic waves," in Industrial Electronics Society, 1998. IECON '98.
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE, 1998, pp. 2391-2396
vol.4.
[2] Scholl G, Schmidt F, Ostertag T, Reindl L, Scherr H, and Wolff U, "Wireless
passive SAW sensor systems for industrial and domestic applications," in
Frequency Control Symposium, 1998. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE
International, 1998, pp. 595-601.
[3] Ye X, Fang L, Liang B, Wang Q, Wang X, He L, Bei W, and Ko W H. Studies of
a high-sensitive surface acoustic wave sensor for passive wireless blood pressure
measurement. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 169, pp. 74-82, 2011.
[4] Wolff U, Dickert F L, Fischerauer G, Greibl W, and Ruppel C C W. SAW
sensors for harsh environments. Sensors Journal, IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 4-13, 2001.
[5] Andle J C, Sabah S, Stevens D S, Jumani S J, Baier M, Wall B W A, Martens T,
and Gruenwald(4)
R. Temperature Monitoring System Using Passive Wireless
Sensors for Switchgear and Power Grid Asset Management. 2010.
[6] Pohl A and Seifert F. Wirelessly interrogable surface acoustic wave sensors for
vehicular applications. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 46, pp. 1031-1038, 1997.
[7] Dixon B, Kalinin V, Beckley J, and Lohr R, "A Second Generation In-Car Tire
Pressure Monitoring System Based on Wireless Passive SAW Sensors," in
International Frequency Control Symposium and Exposition, 2006 IEEE, 2006,
pp. 374-380.
[8] Marc. Loschonsky. Temperature and stress measurements on rotating machinery
for industrial applicaions. Restricted access at - "Wireless SAW Sensor
Symposium 2010", 12/11/2010 2010.
[9] M. Pereira da Cunha A C, P.M. Duvulis, S. Moulzolf,, T. Moonlight R B, G.
Bernhardt, D, Frankel, R.J. Lad, T., and Pollard D M. Wireless Interrogation of
SAW Sensors in Operating Jet Engines at Extreme Temperatures. Restricted
access at - "Wireless SAW Sensor Symposium 2010"
[10] Wilson W, Rogge M, Malocha D, Fisher B, and Atkinson G. Fastener Failure
Detection using a Surface Acoustic Wave Strain Sensor. Sensors Journal, IEEE,
vol. PP, pp. 1-1, 2011.
[11] (09/01/2012). SENSeOR Transceivers. Available:
http://www.senseor.com/transceivers.html
[12] (09/01/2012). SENGENUITY Sensor Engine Technology Available:
http://www.sengenuity.com/tech_ref/TempTrackr_Wireless_Multipoint_System_
Kit-6.pdf
[13] (09/01/2012). Transense Technologies plc "Reader electronics". Available:
http://www.transense.co.uk/technologies/reader-electronics
[14] Wolff U, Schmidt F, Scholl G, and Magori V, "Radio accessible SAW sensors
for non-contact measurement of torque and temperature," in Ultrasonics
Symposium, 1996. Proceedings., 1996 IEEE, 1996, pp. 359-362 vol.1.
[15] Kalinin V, Lohr R, and Leigh A, "Development of a calibration procedure for
contactless torque and temperature sensors based on SAW resonators," in
Ultrasonics Symposium, 2008. IUS 2008. IEEE, 2008, pp. 1865-1868.
[16] Beckley J, Kalinin V, Lee M, and Voliansky K, "Non-contact torque sensors
based on SAW resonators," in Frequency Control Symposium and PDA
Exhibition, 2002. IEEE International, 2002, pp. 202-213.
[17] (09/01/2012). Transense Technologies plc. Available:
http://www.transense.co.uk/
[18] Kalinin, V. Lohr, R. Leigh, and A. Bown G, "Application of Passive SAW
Resonant Sensors to Contactless Measurement of the Output Engine Torque in
Passenger Cars," in Frequency Control Symposium, 2007 Joint with the 21st
European Frequency and Time Forum. IEEE International, 2007, pp. 499-504.
[19] Kalinin V. Wireless Resonant SAW Sensors for Automotive Applications.
Restricted access at - "Wireless SAW Sensor Symposium 2010", 2010.
[20] Donohoe B, Geraghty D, and O'Donnell G E. Wireless Calibration of a Surface
Acoustic Wave Resonator as a Strain Sensor. Sensors Journal, IEEE, vol. 11, pp.
1026-1032, 2011.
[21] Gordon S K and Matthews H. Signal processing in acoustic surface-wave
devices. Spectrum, IEEE, vol. 8, pp. 22-35, 1971.
[22] Shvetsov A, Zhgoon S, Lonsdale A, and Sandacci S, "Deformation sensitive cuts
of quartz for torque sensor," in Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2010 IEEE, 2010,
pp. 1250-1253.
[23] Reindl L, Scholl G, Ostertag T, Scherr H, Wolff U, and Schmidt F. Theory and
application of passive SAW radio transponders as sensors. Ultrasonics,
Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 45, pp. 1281-
1292, 1998.
[24] Kalinin V, Bown G, Beckley J, and Lohr R, "Pulsed interrogation of the SAW
torque sensor for electrical power assisted steering," in Ultrasonics Symposium,
2004 IEEE, 2004, pp. 1577-1580 Vol.3.
[25] Grossman R, Michel J, Sachs T, and Schrufer E, "Measurement of mechanical,
quantities using quartz sensors," in European Frequency and Time Forum, 1996.
EFTF 96., Tenth (IEE Conf. Publ. 418), 1996, pp. 376-381.
[26] Mini-Systems I. (01/06/2011). Electronic Packages. Available: http://www.mini-
systemsinc.com/msipkg/epd_pg.asp
[27] Donohoe B, Geraghty D, O’Donnell G E, and Stoney R. Packaging
considerations for a Surface Acoustic Wave Strain Sensor. JOURNAL OF IEEE
SENSORS, 2011.