Upload
gitanjali-maria
View
4.139
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Charles Schwab Case Study
Citation preview
The Switchboard Business Design
By Group 5:• Cheryl Correa (F11014)• Gitanjali (F11018)• Neha Thomas (F11035)• Ramya Chittigala (F11045)
CONTENTS• Introduction – How it all started
• Business Designs:1. The Discount Brokerage Design2. Serving the Financial Planners3. OneSource: The Switchboard Business Design
• Bridging the Communication Gap – Talk to Chuck Campaign
How it all started• 1971 - Charles Schwab started ‘First Commander’
• Initial business model similar to a conventional brokerage
• No brand, No technology, No client base
• 1975 - SEC outlawed fixed commissions
• Schwab seized opportunity – business design changed to ‘discount broker’
Timeline• 1971- Started the brokerage, First Commander
• 1975 – Started the discount brokerage
• 1984 – Had 20% of discount brokerage market
• 1985-89 – The Schwab Institutional Enterprise
linking independent advisors
• 1989 – TeleBroker system introduced
• 1992 – Charles Schwab OneSource launched
• 1995 – e.Schwab launched
The Discount Brokerage business
• Conventional brokers - high fee due to Advice, Counseling and
Trading capabilities
• Listening Gap: No option for low-cost trades due to ‘Bundled’
package (Advice + Trading functions)
Closing the Gap - Discount brokerage (to unbundle Advice and
Trades)
Value-added Discounter model• Need for differentiation – ‘Why does the customer want to buy
from me?’
• Customer-centric service-design:
• Salaries instead of Commissions• Reliable information to customers• Addressed investors need: Inexpensive Access to Market• Gave customers what they wanted ONLY, no additional costs• Up-to-date technology: More easily executable trades
• Emphasis on greater value to customers influenced Customer-Perception
• Re-invested Profit in:- Building brand-name and branch network- Establishing local presence- Computers & Technology- Investor-support- Advertising: Charles Schwab on TV, radio, billboard and print ads
• Addressed Competition by:- Strong differentiation- Sharing services with new customers instead of hard-selling new
products to existing customers
Second Business Model: Serving the Financial Planners
Market Environment• Change in customer behaviour in the late 1980s – from savings to
investment• Need for unbiased, independent financial advisors• Mushrooming of independent advisors – individual and partnership
firms
What did Schwab do?Developed New Ways to deliver – Using Financial PlannerCreated a new channel to the investors/customers through independent advisors.Leveraged the strength of the financial planners to grow his own business.
Gaps in the Existing Service Model• Listening Gap – Most traditional firms didn’t recognise the change needs of the
customersClosing the Gap – The Schwab Institutional Enterprise linking Charles
Schwab & company with independent financial advisors.
• Service Performance Gap – The financial advisors were not technologically capable of meeting the necessary customers needs through efficient back end operations
Closing the Gap – Schwab stepped in to become the back- office operation for many financial planners and thereby gained more customers for itself.
• Communication Gap – Changing investor behaviour rendered traditional methods of communications unsuccessful
Closing the Gap – Communication about Schwab services through financial advisors/planners.
Benefits Schwab Gained
• Customer selection increased – financial planners as well as
investors
• Converting ‘perceived’ competitors into clients
• Created a large pool of virtual sales force at no cost
• Stayed ahead of competitors by taking advantage of their lack
of response
• Increased profits
The Next Leap - OneSourceWHY?• Enormous expansion in the Mutual fund market space• both in investments and rising of numerous fund companies
• Caused mainly 2 problem to customers:• Dizzying array of mostly unbranded fund options• High overall transaction fee (load fee + brokerage fee)• The transaction fee proved to be not just a financial barrier but a
psychological one• Complexity for customers to relocate assets among funds• Also Schwab focused on business model that had a floor of
recurring revenue
OneSource
WHAT?• “There were thousands of salespeople out there selling load
funds, with huge commissions,” explains Chuck Schwab. “We wanted to create a way for people to buy a variety of mutual funds directly through us — have lots of choice, diversification — in a way that they could do it conveniently and at low cost.”
• This gave rise to ONESOURCE in July 1992
Service Adjuncts• Offered a no-load, no-transaction fee policy – “Discounted
Mutual Funds”
• All funds in OneSource was accessible through a single phone call and was tracked in a single account statement
• Had a double advantage for both investors and mutual fund companies – Acted as a switchboard between the two
• All backend work was carried out by Schwab for the fund companies thereby saving cost and time
The Switchboard Business Design
Industry Response
Mainly 3 types of responses:• Denial : • No response, Thought that OneSource would be just a passing
fad• Fee Structure: • Full service brokerage firms introduced new share classes with
their funds with low or no fees• Imitation : • Replication of same Business Model• Eg: Fidelity included 370 funds
Technology and Schwab• 1989 – Tele Broker• Voice Broker• 1993 – Street smart Software• 1995 – e.Schwab
• Complete account specifically designed for active traders
• Used an e.schwab account to do trading at any time without the assistance of any account reps
Future of Schwab• OneSource as a gateway to bank customers - a customer
segment unlikely to get
• SchwabLife Insurance Services – “Discount Life Insurance”
• AdvisorSource Program – advices clients with > $100,000 in their portfolio
• Bought over UK firm – ShareLink Investment Services as expansion to new markets
Schwab’s Communication in the 21st Century• Competition from low-cost providers causing withdrawals for
Schwab Investor Services customers
• New target market: Mass affluent
• Fairly knowledgeable about investing, want quality services yet are cost-conscious
• Communication strategies: Product-oriented, dispersed campaigns
• Multiple campaigns conflict with each other
Talk to Chuck Campaign• Aimed to increase awareness levels among the target
customers
• Reposition the company as a value-for-money alternative to traditional high fee charging financial services firms
• Communicate that the firm’s objectives are imbibed by each employee of the company.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8rNyK1vGKQ
Campaign Attributes• Easy to pronounce and remember
• References a known personality, whose values can be seen
• Personifies trust, integrity, professionalism, and approachability, confidence in ability to serve customer needs, a personal touch and an overall care for the client as a person
• Encourages investors to have straightforward conversations with a company employee about common issues in taking investment decisions
• An informal feel that projects the feeling of being able to confide in a close friend
Communication Strategy Characteristics
• Target is new and existing customers who can invest $50,000 to $2 million
• Affective component: Changing current investor attitudes towards financial services firms
• Behavioral component: Call and talk to a Schwab representative
• Essentially a pull strategy
Conclusions• Be sensitive to evolving customer needs
• Be proactive
• Ask the right questions
• Be innovative – Seize opportunities
• Be in constant touch with the customer