Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary … 2016-17 EOY Board... · Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary End ... improved and outpaced the state for the

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary End-of-Year Results

Media BriefingSeptember 7, 2017

2

• For the 4th year in a row, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in Mathematics and Math I.

• Compared to 2015-16, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in English II, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology.

• Similarly, Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) rates improved in Mathematics, English II, and Math I, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology compared to 2015-16.

• CMS outperformed the state average and most large districts in the state in College and Career Ready (CCR) rates.

• Seventy-three percent (73%) of schools in CMS met or exceeded growth expectations.

CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward

3

• Student performance on the ACT WorkKeys exam, a national measure of workplace readiness, improved and outpaced the state for the 5th year in a row.

• CMS graduated 89.4% of the 2017 cohort of seniors in four years.

• CMS has a higher four-year cohort graduation rate than the state and most other large school districts in North Carolina.

• The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of A or A+ held steady at 25 schools.

• The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of F held steady at 5 schools.

• Nearly 74% of schools in CMS earned a school performance grade of A, B or C.


4

2017 Cohort Graduation Rate (4-Year)

5

69.9 73.5 76.481.0

85.1 88.3 89.6 89.4

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2014 CMS 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate

NC: 86.5

6

Graduation Rates for All Racial Subgroups

84.986.6 86.5

91.193.0

93.8 94.6 94.8

76.4

84.4 83.286.5 87.3

92.3 94.3 93.0

61.6

66.8

71.3

76.6

82.6

86.8 89.5 89.7

54.658.0

65.5

71.174.3

79.6 79.8 78.5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

White Asian Black Hispanic

2010 to 2017 Change 2016 to 2017 Change

White + 9.9 points + 0.2 points

Asian + 16.6 points - 1.3 points

Black + 28.1 points + 0.2 points

Hispanic + 23.9 points - 1.3 points

Source: NCDPI Cohort Graduation Rate: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/cohortgradrateGraduation Rate Calculation Method: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/cohortgradrate

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/cohortgradrate

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/cohortgradrate

7

Graduation Gaps Have Narrowed Dramatically Since 2010

43.341.6

44.8

53.5

61.8

65.4

68.8 68.2

43.9 42.746.1

46.0

51.9

64.0

57.959.959.8

64.6

69.7

74.5

79.5

83.185.2 85.0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

SWD LEP EDS

2010 to 2017 Change 2016 to 2017 Change

EDS + 25.2 points - 0.2 points

SWD + 24.9 points - 0.6 points

LEP + 16.0 points + 2.0 points

SWD: Students with Disabilities; LEP: Limited English Proficient; EDS: Economically Disadvantaged Students

8

86.5 89.4

81.486.5

89.8 88.5

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

CMS’s Graduation Rate Exceeds Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate - 2017

9

Math and Reading Grades 3-8 Science Grades 5 & 8

Math I, English II & Biology

10

In 2013-14, the State Board of Education adopted a new methodology for determining achievement levels of students.

The State Redefined Its Definition of Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) and College and Career Readiness (CCR)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Grade Level Proficiency ● ● ●College and

Career Ready ● ●

11

67.1 63.8 58.764.4 64.4 58.460.9 66.0 60.463.8 68.956.3

English II Math I Biology

56.8 55.770.3

56.4 56.971.4

58.0 59.473.8

57.2 60.073.1

3-8 Reading 3-8 Math 5 & 8 Science

CMS Proficiency Rates Are Rising in Nearly All Tested Subjects

Percentage of students At or Above Grade Level Proficiency has increased from 2014 to 2017 in all subjects except English II and Biology

Change: 2014 to 2017

+0.4 pointsChange: 2014 to 2017

+4.3 points


+2.8 points

2014 2015 2016 2017Levels 3, 4, & 5


-3.3 pointsChange: 2014 to 2017

+5.1 points


-2.4 points

2014 2015 2016 2017Levels 3, 4, & 5

2014 2015 2016 2017Levels 3, 4, & 5

12

College and Career Readiness Rates in End-of-Grade (EOG) Tested Subjects

45.448.3

59.7

45.349.4

62.4

47.652.7

65.4

45.9

53.3

63.9

3-8 Reading 3-8 Math 5 & 8 Science

2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017


+0.5 pointsChange: 2014 to 2017

+5.0 points


+4.2 points

13

College and Career Readiness Ratesin End-of-Course (EOC) Tested Subjects

56.652.8

49.554.2 56.0

50.252.7

58.152.454.3

60.2

48.6

English II Math I Biology

2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017


-2.3 pointsChange: 2014 to 2017

+7.4 points


-0.9 points

14

Percentage of Students Proficient in Reading

TestCMS

2015-16 Percent Proficient

CMS2016-17

Percent Proficient

Change from 2015-16 to

2016-17

Reading 3 58.5% 58.4% -0.1 points

Reading 4 57.9% 57.3% -0.6 points

Reading 5 55.5% 56.5% +1.0 points

Reading 6 59.7% 60.2% +0.5 points

Reading 7 60.4% 57.3% -3.1 points

Reading 8 56.2% 53.2% -3.0 points

Reading 3-8 58.0% 57.2% -0.8 points

Percentage of Students Grade Level Proficient (Achievement Levels 3, 4, and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

15

Percentage of Students CCR In Reading Declined

Test

CMS2015-16 Percent

C & C Ready

CMS2016-17Percent

C & C Ready


2016-17

Reading 3 49.6% 46.5% -3.1 points

Reading 4 46.6% 44.3% -2.3 points

Reading 5 44.3% 43.7% -0.6 points

Reading 6 51.2% 50.4% -0.8 points

Reading 7 49.1% 48.8% -0.3 points

Reading 8 44.8% 42.2% -2.6 points

Reading 3-8 47.6% 45.9% -1.7 points

Percentage of Students College and Career Ready (Achievement Levels 4 and 5) from 2015-16 to 2016-17

16

Percentage of Students Proficient in Math is Rising

Test

CMS2015-16 Percent

Proficient

CMS2016-17 Percent

Proficient


2016-17

Science 5

74.5% 72.2% -2.3pts.

Science8

73.0% 74.0% +1.0 pts.

Science5 & 8

73.8% 73.1% -0.7 pts.

Test

CMS2015-16 Percent

Proficient

CMS2016-17 Percent

Proficient


2016-17

Math 3 68.5% 68.2% -0.3 pts.

Math 4 62.1% 62.7% +0.6 pts.

Math 5 65.8% 65.6% -0.2 pts.

Math 6 55.4% 56.8% +1.4 pts.

Math 7 53.4% 54.7% +1.3 pts.

Math 8 49.5% 50.4% +0.9 pts.

Math 3-8

59.4% 60.0% +0.6 pts.


17

Percentage of Students CCR in Math is Rising

Test

CMS2015-16 Percent

C & C Ready

CMS2016-17 Percent

C & C Ready


2016-17

Science 5

66.1% 62.6% -3.5 pts.

Science8

64.6% 65.2% +0.6 pts.

Science5 & 8

65.4% 63.9% -1.5 pts.

Test

CMS2015-16 Percent

C & C Ready

CMS2016-17 Percent

C & C Ready


2016-17

Math 3 57.0 % 58.2 % +1.2 pts.

Math 4 56.7% 55.6% -1.1 pts.

Math 5 60.4% 60.1% -0.3 pts.

Math 6 49.0% 50.3% +1.3 pts.

Math 7 47.3% 48.8% +1.5 pts.

Math 8 44.2% 45.1% +0.9 pts.

Math 3-8

52.7% 53.3% +0.6 pts.


18

Percentage of Students Proficient in English II and Math I is Rising

TestCMS

2015-16 Percent Proficient

CMS2016-17

Percent Proficient


2016-17

English II 60.9% 63.8% +2.9 points

Math I 66.0% 68.9% +2.9 points

Biology 60.4% 56.3% -4.1 points

EOC Composite

62.8% 63.6% +0.8 points


19

Percentage of Students CCR in English II and Math I is Rising


Test

CMS2015-16 Percent

C & C Ready

CMS2016-17 Percent

C & C Ready


2016-17

English II 52.7% 54.3% +1.6 points

Math I 58.1% 60.2% +2.1 points

Biology 52.4% 48.6% -3.8 points

EOC Composite

54.8% 54.9% +0.1 points

20

59.2 61.2

46.4

53.6 55.6

67.2


CMS OutperformedMost Other Large Districts in North Carolina

GLP Performance Composite

Overall Performance Composite – Percent Grade Level Proficient (Levels 3, 4 and 5)by District and NC

21

49.2 52.2

37.444.8 46.5

58.8


CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

CCR Performance Composite

Overall Performance Composite – Percent College and Career Ready (Levels 4 and 5)by District and NC

22


3-8 Math GLP3-8 Reading GLP

Percent of Students Grade Level Proficient in Reading, Math and Science by District and NC

57.5 57.2

44.7

50.8 52.5

66.5

55.460.0

42.2

48.951.2

63.6

72.8 73.1

60.565.4

67.6

76.5

NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake

5 & 8 Science GLP

23

CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina

3-8 Math CCR3-8 Reading CCR

Percent of Students College & Career Ready on the Reading, Math and Science EOG Tests by District and NC

45.5 45.9

34.2

40.4 41.7

56.1

47.6

53.3

35.1

42.5 44.1

57.3

62.6 63.9

49.4

55.957.8

67.7


5 & 8 Science CCR

24


Math I GLP

60.763.8

52.6

58.261.1

70.0

64.368.9

46.7

62.666.9

74.4

56.1 56.3

46.5

58.054.0

61.4


English II GLP

Percent of Students Grade Level Proficient on the English II, Math I, and Biology Exams by District and NC

Biology GLP

25


Math I CCR

50.154.3

42.9

48.250.9

60.5

54.1

60.2

37.9

51.1

57.3

65.5

47.5 48.6

39.4

50.045.9

53.7


English II CCR

Percent of Students College & Career Ready on the EOC Tests by District and NC

Biology CCR

26

Schools Meeting or Exceeding Expected Growth:2012-13 to 2016-17

27

• School Growth is an indication of the average rate at which students in a school learned over the past year.

• The standard is roughly equivalent to a year’s worth of expected growth for a year of instruction.

• The growth measure is defined in one of three ways: did not meet expected growth; met expected growth; or exceeded expected growth.

School Growth

28

Nearly Three Quarters of CMS Schools Met or Exceeded Growth Expectations

YearDistrict/

State

Total Number

of Schools

# Meetingor

Exceeding Growth

% Meetingor

Exceeding Growth

2012-13 CMS 156 127 81.4%

2013-14 CMS 157 130 82.8%

2014-15 CMS 160 131 81.9%

2015-16 CMS 165 141 85.5%

2016-17 CMS 164 119 72.6%

2016-17 NC 2,531 1,866 73.7%

Note: In 2016-17, six schools did not have growth data, as provided by EVAAS/NC (Cato Middle College High, Harper Middle College High, Levine Middle College High, Metro School, Lincoln Heights and Turning Point Academy) and are not included in the denominator.

29

School Performance Grades:2013-14 to 2016-17

30

Effective in the 2013-14 school year, North Carolina assigned School Performance Grades to all public schools. The School Performance Grades are based on student achievement (80%) and growth (20%). The indicators and the proficiency standard or benchmark used for achievement include:

1. Annual End-of-Grade (EOG) mathematics and reading assessments in grades 3–8 and science assessments in grades 5 and 8 (Level 3 and above)

2. Annual End-of-Course (EOC) assessments in Math I, Biology, and English II (Level 3 and above)3. The percentage of graduates who complete Math III, Algebra II, or Integrated Math III with a passing grade4. The percentage of grade 11 students who achieve the minimum score required for admission into a constituent

institution of The University of North Carolina on the ACT (composite score of 17)5. The percentage of graduates identified as Career and Technical Education concentrators who meet the Silver

Certificate or higher on the ACT WorkKeys assessment6. The percentage of students who graduate within four years of entering high school (Standard [4-Year] Cohort

Graduation Rate)

The EVAAS model, which provides the growth measure, uses current and previous student test data to determine whether schools are maintaining or increasing student achievement from one year to the next. In the event that a school does not have a Growth Score, only the School Achievement Score is used to calculate the Performance Score.

It is important to note that schools that have met or exceeded growth may still receive a low School Performance Grade since achievement accounts for 80% of the grade.

School Performance Grades

For 2013–14 through 2016-17, the grade designations are set on a 15-point scale:

31

Number of Schools with an A/A+ at 25 (15%) for the 2nd Year

Schools Performance Grades

YearA+

N/(%)A

N/(%)B

N/(%)C

N/(%)D

N/(%)F

N/(%)Total

2013-14 --17

(11%)47

(30%)46

(29%)36

(23%)11

(7%)157

2014-158

(5%)11

(7%)50

(31%)44

(28%)37

(23%)10

(6%)160

2015-1614

(8%)11

(7%)42

(25%)61

(37%)32

(19%)5

(3%)165

2016-1715*(9%)

10(6%)

40(24%)

58(35%)

39(23%)

5(3%)

167

*In 2014-15, the state introduced A+ grades. Schools that earn an “A” designation and do not have significant achievement and/or graduation gaps will be designated as an “A+” school. Significant achievement and graduation gaps are defined as in-school gaps that are above the three-year state average when averaging gaps in the previous year and at least one of the two prior years between the highest-achieving subgroup and lowest-achieving subgroup. In 2016-17, 15 schools were designated as A+ schools. These schools are Bain ES, Beverly Woods ES, Dilworth ES, Elon Park ES, Polo Ridge ES, Hawk Ridge ES, Huntersville ES, Ballantyne ES, McKee Road ES, Olde Providence ES, Piedmont IB MS, Providence Spring ES, Providence HS, South Charlotte MS, and Grand Oak ES.

25 schools received a SPG of an A or A+ in 2015-16 and 2016-17 compared to 19 schools in 2014-15The number of schools receiving an F grade decreased from 10 in 2014-15 to 5 in 2015-16 and remained

the same in 2016-17

32

School Performance Grade Changes

2 3 2

5

2

11

7

33

47

25

33 2

6

12

2

A + A B C D F

SPG IMPROVEMENT FROM 2015-16 TO 2016-17

Improved since 2015-16 Maintained since 2015-16 Declined since 2015-16

Note: There are five schools that are not included in this chart because they did not have a School Performance Grade in one or both years because they use an alternate accountability model or because they were new schools in 2015-16 or 2016-17.

33

ACT and WorkKeys Exam Performance2016-17

34

ACT Performance Overview – Juniors

2017

EnglishAverage Score(Change from

2016)

MathAverage Score(Change from

2016)

ReadingAverage Score(Change from

2016)

ScienceAverage Score(Change from

2016)

CompositeAverage Score(Change from

2016)

CMS 17.2(-.2)

19.2 (-.2)

18.9(-.5)

18.6(-.3)

18.6 (-.3)

State 17.4(+.3)

18.9(0)

18.9(-.1)

18.8(-.1)

18.6(0)

North Carolina is one of over 20 states to require all 11th grade students to take the ACT.

2017 Grade 11 ACT results as reported by ACT.

35

ACT Performance Overview – Graduating Seniors

2017

EnglishAverage Score(Change from

2016)

MathAverage Score(Change from

2016)

ReadingAverage Score(Change from

2016)

ScienceAverage Score(Change from

2016)

CompositeAverage Score(Change from

2016)

CMS 17.8(+.2)

19.6 (+.2)

19.7(+.5)

19.2(+.2)

19.2(+.3)

State 17.8(0)

19.3(-.1)

19.6(+.1)

19.3(+.1)

19.1(0)

2017 Graduating Seniors results as reported by ACT.

36

CMS Improved Performance on ACT WorkKeys Exam for the 5th Straight Year

Percent of Senior CTE Concentrators with a Silver Certificate or Better

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

CMS 68.9% 73.7% 73.9% 76.1% 77.0%

State 67.3% 67.6% 72.1% 73.5% 73.3%

Attainment of a Silver Certificate or Better is an Indicator of Career and Workplace Readiness

ACT WorkKeys Performance – Senior CTE Concentrators

Sources: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/act/http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/state34_North%20Carolina_Web_Secured.pdf

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/act/

http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/state34_North Carolina_Web_Secured.pdf

37

• For the 4th year in a row, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in Mathematics and Math I.

• Compared to 2015-16, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in English II, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology.

• Similarly, Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) rates improved in Mathematics, English II, and Math I, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology compared to 2015-16.

• CMS outperformed the state average and most large districts in the state in College and Career Ready (CCR) rates.

• Seventy-three percent (73%) of schools in CMS met or exceeded growth expectations.


38

• Student performance on the ACT WorkKeys exam, a national measure of workplace readiness, improved and outpaced the state for the 5th year in a row.

• CMS graduated 89.4% of the 2017 cohort of seniors in four years.

• CMS has a higher four-year cohort graduation rate than the state and most other large school districts in North Carolina.

• The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of A or A+ held steady at 25 schools.

• The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of F held steady at 5 schools.

• Nearly 74% of schools in CMS earned a school performance grade of A, B or C.


39

• School Improvement Plans

• Build upon the strategies and successes of schools and staff within CMS

• Secondary teacher-leader cadre

• Focus on foundational literacy skills:

– Reading Foundations professional development/application expansion

– NC Pre-K Expansion

– North Star Reading Partners, starting at 2nd Grade

– Cross subject/content integration

– Partner Community Efforts

• Integration of all content areas with literacy

• Instructional Leadership Team process fidelity with a focus on writing

Moving Forward

40

• Preparation of staff and students in response to K-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics standards shifts for the 2018-19 school year

• Embedding social-emotional learning and cultural proficiency strategies/resources within the English Language Arts curriculum

• Specially designed curriculum for English Learners.

• Continued support for rigorous lesson planning through Instructional Planning Approach

• Instructional Coaching support by Learning Community staff

Moving Forward

41

Documents

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary … 2016-17 EOY Board... · Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2016-2017 Preliminary End ... improved and outpaced the state for the