41
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, McCone, Richland, Dawson, and Wibaux Counties, Montana, and Golden Valley County, North Dakota by Ronald H. Affolter and Joseph R. Hatch Open-File Report 80-179 1980 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey standards

Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

  • Upload
    vandung

  • View
    217

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation,

McCone, Richland, Dawson, and Wibaux Counties, Montana,

and Golden Valley County, North Dakota

by

Ronald H. Affolter and Joseph R. Hatch

Open-File Report 80-179 1980

This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey standards

Page 2: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

INTRODUCTION

As part of a continuing program by the U.S. Geological Survey to collect

and chemically analyze representative samples of U.S. coals, 57 lignite

samples were collected from 27 core holes in the Paleocene Fort Union

Formation in northeastern Montana and western North Dakota (fig« 1).

Analytical data obtained from these samples are summarized in this report.

Four core holes (nine lignite samples) are from McCone County, Montana; three

core holes (seven lignite samples) are from Richland County, Montana; four

core holes (eight lignite samples) are from Dawson County, Montana; ten core

holes (20 lignite samples) are from Wibaux County, Montana; and six core holes

(13 lignite samples) are from Golden Valley County, North Dakota. The 57

samples are listed in table 1 and the locations of the core holes are shown in

figure 2. Geophysical and lithologic logs for all US-75 core holes are in

U.S. Geological Survey and Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (1976); for all

US-76 core holes, U.S. Geological Survey and Montana Bureau of Mines and

Geology (1977); and for all WB-77 core holes, Harksen (1978).

EXPLANATION OF TABLES

Proximate and ultimate analyses, heat-of-combustion, air-dried-loss,

forms-of-sulfur, and ash-fusion-temperature determinations on 55 single and

composite lignite samples from the Fort Union Formation, McCone, Richland,

Dawson, and Wibaux Counties, Montana, and Golden Valley County, North Dakota

are listed in table 2. These analyses were provided by the U.S. Department of

Energy, Pittsburgh, Pa. Analyses for ash content and 35 major and minor

oxides and trace elements in the laboratory ash (table 3) and analyses of nine

trace elements in whole lignite (table 4) for all 57 samples were provided by

the U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo. Analytical procedures used by the

U.S. Geological Survey are described in Swanson and Huffman (1976).

Page 3: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

MONTAN t

50

II 25

NORTH DAKOTA

'

SOUTH DAKOTA

100 i

150

KIL

OM

ET

ER

S

I 50

I 7510

0 M

ILE

S

FO

RT

S?

RE

GIO

N

Figure 1. Map of northeastern Mo

ntan

a an

d western North

Dakota showing

locations

of McCone,

Richland,

Daws

on,

and

Wiba

ux Co

unti

es,

Montana, an

d Go

lden

Valley Co

unty

, North

Dakota,

and

an ou

tline

of the

Fort

Union

coal re

gion

. Map

modified fr

om Averitt (1

942)

.

Page 4: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 1. U«S« Geological Survey sample numbers, core-hole numbers, index maplocations, core-hole locations, and depth intervals represented for 57 lignitesamples from the Paleocene Fort Union Formation, McCone, Richland, Dawson, andWibaux Counties, Mont., and Golden Valley County, N. Dak.

[All samples are from cores. One meter = 3.28 feet. The first two the USGS core-hole numbers indicates year drilled]

USGS sample number

D188118 D188119 D188120 D188121 D188122 D188123 D188124 D188125 D188126

USGS Index core-hole map number location

US-762 do do US-768 do US-7616 do US- 76 17 do

1 1 1

25 25 2 2

26 26

McCone

SE */4 NE

NWV4NE

SE V4 SE

NEl/4 SE

Core hole location

County, Mont.

V4sec. 26, T. do -. do i/y Q O f"* * / T .. IQ OCL.* £- j X

. do !/4sec. 20, T. . do I// QPP. 30 T./A ocl_. J w , -L

__________/4 /-.____

21 N., R.

20 N., R.

20 N., R.

20 N., R.

digits in

Depth interval represented in meters

45 E.

45 E.

45 E.

45 E.

23.8-25.3 25.3-26.8 26.8-28.2 56.4-59.4 59.4-61.7 29.3-32.2 32.2-34.1 9.7-12.7 12.7-15.6

Richland County, Mont.

D188136 D188137 D188138 D188140 D188141 D188142 D188143

D188128 D188129 D188130 D188131 D188132 D188133 D188134 D188135

D188144 D188145 D196641 D196642 D196643 D196645 D196647 D196648DlQfifiAQ

US-75119 do US-76113 US-7695 do do do

US-75104 US- 75106 do US-75108 do do do US- 7597

US-76116 do WB-7783 do do WB-7740 do do

3 3 4

27 27 27 27

5 6 6 7 7 7 7 8

9 9

10 10 1011 11 111 1

NE x/4 SW

SW 1/4 SE SW !/4 SE

Dawson

NE V4 SE SE 1/4 SE

SW !/4 SE

NE 1/4 NE

Wibaux

NWV4 NW

NE !/4 NE

SW 1/4 SW

!/4sec. 30, T. do l/4sec. 22, T. 1/4 sec. 4, T. do do do

County, Mont.

V4sec. 8, T. 1/4 sec. 24, T. do !/4sec. 1, T. do do . do 1/4 sec. 14, T.

County, Mont.

V4sec. 18, T. . do 1/4 sec. 2, T.. do do 1/4 sec. 14, T. do do

j

22 N., R.

20 N., R. 20 N., R.

21 N., R. 20 N., R.

20 N., R.

21 N., R.

18 N., R.

15 N., R.

14 N., R.

54 E.

59 E. 59 E.

53 E. 52 E.

54 E.

55 E.

59 E.

59 E.

60 E.

28.7-30.9 30.9-31.7 33.5-35.4 45.7-46.0 46.2-50.8 66.4-67.4 67.4-68.7

11.0-13.4 20.1-22.6 22.6-25.0 53.9-56.4 56.4-58.9 58.9-61.4 61.4-64.2 20.7-22.6

18.8-20.1 45.7-48.2 13.1-14.3 14.3-14.9 22.6-26.8 14.0-19.5 33.2-34.7 35.5-36.8

Page 5: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 1. U.S. Geological Survey sample numbers, core-holelocations, core-hole locations, and depth

numbers , indexintervals represented for

samples from the Paleocene Fort Union Formation,Wibaux

usessample number

Counties, Mont. , and Golden

USGS Index core-hole map number location

Valley CountyMcCone,

, N. Dak.

map57 lignite

Rich land, Daws on, and. continued

Core hole location

Depth interval represented in meters

Wibaux County, Mont, (cont.)

D196650 D196651 D196652 D196653 D196654 D196655 D196657 D196658 D196659 D196661 D196662

WB-7731 do WB-7787 WB-7736 do WB-7758 do WB-776 do WB-7763 WB-7785

12 12 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 18

SE

NE NW

SW

NE

NW SW

V4NW

1/4 SE 1/4 SW

1/4 SW

1/4 NE

1/4 SW V4SE

Y4 sec.

1/4 sec. 1/4 sec.

1/4 sec.

1/4 sec.

1/4 sec. 1/4 sec.

10, T. do 34, T. 34, T. do 26, T. do-'20, T. do-20, T. 6, T.

Golden Valley County, N.

D196624 D196625 D196627 D196628 D196629 D196630 D196631 D196632 D196634 D196635 D196637 D196638 D196640

WB-773 do WB-77104 do WB-7755 do do do do WB-77107 WB-7714 do Wb-7724

19 19 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 22 23 23 24

SE

NE

NW

V4SE

!/4NW

1/4 NW

NW 1/4 NE

SE NE

NE

1/4 SE 1/4 NW

!/4NW

V4 sec.

1/4 sec.

1/4 sec.

1/4 sec.

1/4 sec. 1/4 sec.

1/4 sec.

10, T.

10, T. do 20, T. do 20, T. do do 20, T. 34, T. do 22, T.

13 N.,

16 N., 14 N.,

15 N.,

12 N.,

15 N., 15 N.,

Dak.

138 N.,

138 N.,

141 N.,

141 N.,

141 N., 139 N.,

139 N.,

R.

R. R.

R.

R.

R. R.

R.

R.

R.

R.

R. R.

R.

60 E.

59 E. 60 E.

60 E.

61 E.

60 E. 60 E.

106 W.

106 W.

105 W.

105 W.

105 W. 106 W.

106 W.

30. 40. 73. 16. 29. 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23.

14. 22. 14. 17. 10. 14. 23. 28. 36. 44. 15. 17. 13.

8-40.2 5-41.1 2-75.9 4-29.2 2-29.5 7-22.1 0-28.9 1-14.7 6-19.4 6-17.0 8-26.1

5-14.8 7-26.2 9-15.5 7-21.0 7-12.3 5-14.8 4-24.0 0-34.4 3-36.5 8-52.1 2-17.7 7-22.3 3-19.8

Page 6: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

M C CONE

.2

.26

L______.,

u

I_______,

R

I C

H L A N D

.s

,-J.27 .4

D A W S 0 N

J 3°

, z -

._J_,

-VG

0

.12

V A

L D

E

L L

E

is. i

-'120

0

10

20

30

40

SO KILOMETERS

I I

I I

I I

Figure 2. Index map showing co

re hole locations in

McCone, Richland, Dawson, and Wibaux Counties, Montana, and

Golden Valley County, North Dakota.

Detailed location descriptions are

in table 1.

Page 7: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 5 contains the data listed in table 3 converted to a whole-lignite

basis plus for completeness, the whole-lignite analyses listed in table 4.

Twenty-four additional elements not listed in tables 3, 4, and 5 were looked

for but not found in amounts greater than their lower limits of detection

(table 6). Unweighted statistical summaries of analytical data in tables 2,

3, and 5 are listed in tables 7, 8, and 9. For comparison, data summaries for

32 other Fort Union region lignite samples (table 7) and 80 other Fort Union

region lignite samples (tables 8 and 9) are included. Statistical summaries

for ?2^5 contents in lignite ash and Ag, Cd, Ge, and La contents in whole

lignite were not included in tables 7 and 9 because these variables were

detected in an insufficient number of samples to calculate meaningful

statistics.

^2®5 contents for all samples were determined by X-ray-fluorescence

spectroscopy. However, due to a change in technique the lower detection limit

for samples D188118-D188126, D188128-D188138, and D188140-D188145 is 1.0

percent in ash; for the other 31 samples it is 0.01 percent in whole coal.

To be consistent with the precision of the semiquantitative emission

spectrographic technique, arithmetic and geometric means of elements

determined by this method are reported as the midpoint of the enclosing six-

step brackets (see headnote of table 3, or Swanson and Huffman, 1976, p. 6 for

an explanation of six-step brackets.)

EXPLANATION OF STATISTICAL TERMS USED IN SUMMARY TABLES

In this report the geometric mean (GM) is used as the estimate of the

most probable concentration (mode); the geometric mean is calculated by taking

the logarithm of each analytical value, summing the logarithms, dividing the

sum by the total number of values, and obtaining the antilogarithm of the

result. The measure of scatter about the mode used here is the geometric

deviation (GD), which is the antilog of the standard deviation of the

Page 8: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

logarithms of the analytical values. These statistics are used because the

quantities of trace elements in natural materials commonly exhibit positively

skewed frequency distributions; such distributions are normalized by analyzing

and summarizing trace-element data on a logarithmic basis.

If the frequency distributions are lognormal, the geometric mean is the

best estimate of the mode, and the estimated range of the central two-thirds

of the observed distribution has a lower limit equal to GM/GD and an upper

limit equal to GM-GD. The estimated range of the central 95 percent of the

oobserved distribution has a lower limit equal to GM/GD and an upper limit

equal to GM-GD 2 (Connor and others, 1976).

Although the geometric mean is, in general, an adequate estimate of the

most common analytical value, it is, nevertheless, a biased estimate of the

arithmetic mean. The estimates of the arithmetic means listed in the summary

tables are Sichel's _t_ statistic (Miesch, 1967).

A common problem in statistical summaries of trace-element data arises

when the element content of one or more of the samples is below the limit of

analytical detection. This results in a "censored" distribution. Procedures

developed by Cohen (1959) were used to compute unbiased estimates of the

geometric mean, geometric deviation, and arithmetic mean when the data are

censored.

DISCUSSION

The apparent ranks of all 55 single and composite lignite samples from

the Fort Union Formation, McCone, Richland, Dawson, and Wibaux Counties,

Montana, and Golden Valley County, North Dakota were calculated using the data

in table 2 and the formulas in ASTM designation D-388-77 (American Society for

Testing and Materials, 1978). The apparent ranks of these samples range from

lignite B (two samples) to lignite A (53 samples)

Page 9: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

A statistical comparison (Student's t test, 95-percent confidence level)

of the geometric mean contents of the U.S. Department of Energy data for 55

lignite core samples from the Fort Union Formation listed in this report with

means for 32 other Fort Union region lignite samples from mines (Swanson,

Huffman, and Hamilton, 1974) shows that the lignite core samples have

significantly higher contents of moisture, ash, sulfate and pyritic sulfur,

significantly lower contents of volatile matter, fixed carbon, and carbon, and

a significantly lower heat of combustion. The contents of hydrogen, nitrogen,

oxygen, total sulfur, and organic sulfur are not significantly different.

When compared at the 99-percent confidence level the contents of moisture,

fixed carbon, sulfate and pyritic sulfur are not significantly different.

A statistical comparison of the geometric mean contents of ash and

contents of nine major and minor oxides in the ash from 57 lignite core

samples listed in this report with means for 80 other Fort Union region mine

and core lignite samples listed in Hatch and Swanson (1977) shows that the

lignite core samples have significantly higher ash contents, higher SiC^,

K20, Fe20^ and Ti02 contents in the ash, and significantly lower CaO, MgO, and

SOg contents in the ash. The contents of A^O^ and Na2^ in ash are not

significantly different. When compared at the 99-percent confidence level the

contents of f&2^3 and TiC^ in ash are not significantly different.

A statistical comparison of the geometric means of the contents of 35

elements in 57 lignite core samples listed in this report with means for 80

other Fort Union region mine and core samples listed in Hatch and Swanson

(1977) shows that the lignite core samples have significantly higher contents

of Si, Al, Mg, K, Fe, Ti, As, Be, Cu, F, Ga, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, U, V, Y, Yb,

Zn, and Zr and significantly lower contents of Ba, Co, Cr, Sr, and Th. The

contents of Ca, Na, B, Hg, Nb, Pb, Sc, and Se are not significantly

Page 10: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

different. When compared at the 99-percent confidence level the contents of

As, Ba, F, Ni, and Th are not significantly different.

Differences in the oxide composition of lignite ashes and the elemental

contents of lignite result from differences in the total and relative amounts

of the various inorganic minerals, the elemental composition of these

minerals, and the total and relative amounts of any organically bound

elements. The chemical form and distribution of a given element are dependent

on the geologic history of the lignite bed. A partial listing of the factors

that influence element distributions would include chemical composition of

original plants; amounts and compositions of the various detrital, diagenetic,

and epigenetic minerals; chemical characteristics of the ground waters that

come in contact with the bed; temperatures and pressures during burial; and

extent of weathering. No evaluation of these factors has been made for any of

the Fort Union Formation lignite samples listed in this report.

Compared to other U.S. coals (Swanson and others, 1976; Hatch and

Swanson, 1977), Fort Union Formation lignites are characterized by relatively

low ash, low sulfur, low heat of combustion, and a high moisture content. The

contents of elements of environmental concern such as As, Be, Hg, Mo, Sb, and

Se are low in Fort Union Formation lignite when compared to most other U.S.

coals.

Page 11: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Fundamental to this paper is the contribution of the team of chemical

laboratory personnel in the U.S. Geological Survey under the direction of

Claude Huffman, Jr. and Joseph H. Christie: James W. Baker, Ardith J. Bartel,

Candy Bliss, Nancy M. Conklin, James G. Crock, Celeste M. Ellis, Patricia G.

Guest, John C. Hamilton, Raymond G. Havens, Roy J. Knight, Cindy McFee, Violet

M. Merritt, Hugh T. Millard, Jr., Harriet G. Neiman, George 0. Riddle, Gaylord

D. Shipley, Vertie C. Smith, James A. Thomas, Michele L. Tuttle, Richard E.

VanLoenen, James S. Wahlberg. In connection with the acknowledgment to the

above staff of chemical analysts, the invaluable contribution of the chemists

in the Coal Analysis Section (Forrest E. Walker, Chemist in Charge), U.S.

Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, Pa., is also gratefully acknowledged. We

also appreciate Rick T. Hildebrand's help in preparing the data tables and

Betty L. Arnone's drafting of the illustrations.

10

Page 12: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

REFERENCES CITED

American Society for Testing and Materials, 1978, Standard specifications for

classification of coals by rank (ASTM designation D-388-77): 1978 Annual

book of ASTM standards, pt, 26, p. 220-224.

Averitt, Paul, 1942, Coal fields of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey

map, scale 1:2,500,000.

Cohen, A. C., 1959, Simplified estimators for the normal distribution when

samples are singly censored or truncated: Technometrics, v. 1, no. 3, p.

217-237.

Connor, J. J., Keith, J. R., and Anderson, B. M., 1976, Trace-metal variation

in soils and sagebrush in the Powder River basin, Wyoming and Montana:

U.S. Geological Survey Journal of Research, v. 4, no. 1, p. 49-59.

Harksen, J. C., 1978, Geophysical and lithologic logs for the 1977 coal

drilling in Wibaux County, Montana and Golden Valley County, North

Dakota: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-251, 185 p.

Hatch, J. R., and Swanson, V. E., 1977, Trace elements in Rocky Mountain

coals, JLn_ Murray, D. K., ed., Geology of Rocky Mountain Coal A

symposium: Colorado Geological Survey Resources Series 1, p. 143-165.

Miesch, A. T., 1967, Methods of computation for estimating geochemical

abundances: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 574-B, 15 p.

Swanson, V. E., and Huffman, Claude, Jr., 1976, Guidelines for sample

collecting and analytical methods used in the U.S. Geological Survey for

determining chemical composition of coal: U.S. Geological Survey

Circular 735, 11 p.

11

Page 13: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Swanson, V. E., Huffman, Claude, Jr., and Hamilton, J. C., 1974, Composition

and trace-element content of coal, Northern Great Plains area, in

Northern Great Plains Resource Program, Mineral Resources Work Group

Report, February, 1974: U.S. Department of the Interior Open-File

Report, p. 52-83 (includes 2 fig., 8 tables).

Swanson, V. E., Medlin, J. H., Hatch, J. R., Coleman, S. L., Wood, G. H., Jr.,

Woodruff, S. D., and Hildebrand, R. T., 1976, Collection, chemical

analysis, and evaluations of coal samples in 1975: U.S. Geological

Survey Open-File Report 76-468, 503 p.

U.S. Geological Survey and Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, 1976,

Preliminary report of coal drill-hole data and chemical analyses of coal

beds in Campbell, Converse, and Sheridan Counties, Wyoming, and Big Horn,

Richland and Dawson Counties, Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File

Report 76-450, 382 p.

_____1977, Preliminary report on 1976 drilling of coals in Campbell and

Sheridan Counties, Wyoming; and Big Horn, Dawson, McCone, Richland,

Roosevelt, Rosebud, Sheridan, and Wibaux Counties, Montana: U.S.

Geological Survey Open-File Report 77-283, 403 p.

12

Page 14: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table

2. Proximate and

ulti

mate

an

alys

es,

and

heat

-of-

comb

usti

on,

form

s-of

-sul

fur,

and

ash-

fusi

on-t

empe

ratu

re determinations for

55 li

gnit

e sa

mple

s from the

Fort

Un

ion

Formation. Mc

Cone

, Richland.

Daws

on.

and

Wiba

ux Co

unti

es,

Mont., and

Gold

en Valley

Coun

ty.

N. Da

k.

[All

an

alys

es in

pe

rcen

t ex

cept

heat of

combustion and

ash-fusion te

mper

atur

es.

For

each sa

mple

nu

mber

, th

e analyses are

repo

rted

th

ree

ways:

First, as received;

seco

nd,

moisture free;

and

third, moisture an

d as

h fr

ee.

Kcal

/kg

« 0.

556

(Btu/lb);

°F =

(°C

x 1.8) + 32;

L, less than the

valu

e sh

own,

B, not

dete

rmin

ed.

Sample D188118* is

a

comp

osit

e of

sa

mple

s D1

8811

8 and

D188119; D188142* is

a

comp

osit

e of D1

8814

2 and

D188

143.

J

Pro

xim

ate

analy

sis

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

*

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D18

8138

D18

8140

Mo

istu

re

36

.4

38.1

37.2

_

38

.0

34

.9

35.5

42.4

_

37.1

39.6

40.6

41

.0

37

.9

Vola

tile

m

att

er

25.1

39.5

44.6

24.8

40.1

44.4

13

.321.2

23.2

15

.124.4

26.8

15.8

24.3

28.5

16.0

24.8

28.0

24.6

42.7

45.6

16.2

25.8

' 27.6

25.3

41

.949.5

26.5

44.6

48.6

27

.045.8

51

.8

26.6

42.8

49

.3

Fix

ed

carb

on

31.2

49.1

55.4

31.0

50.1

55.6

44.0

70.1

76.8

41.3

66.6

73.2

39.7

61.0

71.5

41.1

63.7

72.0

29.4

51.0

54.4

42.5

67.6

72.4

25.9

42.9

50.7

28.0

47.1

51.4

25.1

42.5

48.2

27.4

44.1

50.7

Ash

7.3

11.5

6.1

9.9

5.5

8.8

5.6

9.0

9.6

14.7

7.4

11.5

3.6

6.2

4.2 6.7

9.3

15.4

4.9

8.2

6-9

11.7

8.1

13.0

Hyd

roge

n

6.4

3.7

4.2 6.6

3.8

4.2

6.6

3.9

4.3

6.5

3.7

4.0

6.6

4.2

4.9

6.6

4.1

4.7

6.7

3.5

3.7

6.8

4.3

4.6 B B B B B B 7.1

4.3

4.9

6.9

4.3

5.0

Ult

imat

e analy

sis

Car

bon

40.1

63.1

71.2

39.7

64.1

71.1

41.5

66.1

72.4

40.7

65.6

72.2

40.0

61.4

72.1

41.4

64.2

72.5

37.3

64.8

69.1

41.9

66.6

71.4 B B B B B B

36.9

62.5

70.8

38.8

62.5

71.9

Nit

rogen

0.6 .9

1.1 .6

1.0

1.1 .6

1.0

1.0 .6 1.0

1.1 .6 .9

1.1 .6 .9

1.1 .6 1.0

1.1 .6 1.0

1.0 B B B B B B .7 1.2

1.3 .6 1.0

1.1

Oxy

gen

45.3

20.4

23.0

46.9

21.1

23.4

45.4

19.6

21.5

46.5

20.5

22.6

42.3

17.3

20.3

42.9

17.6

19.9

51.5

24.0

25.6

46.3

21.2

22.7 B B B B B B

47.8

19.2

21.8

44.6

17

.620.2

Su

lfu

r

0.3 .5 .5 .2 .3 .4 .4 .6 .7 .2 .3 .4 .8

1.2

1.4 1.0

1.6

1.8 .2 .3 .4 .2 .3 .3 1.0

1.7

2.0 .3 ..5 .6 .6 1.0

1.2 1.0

1.6

1-9

Hea

t of

com

bust

ion

Kca

l/k

g

3,6

70

5,7

70

6,5

20

3,6

20

5,8

60

6,5

00

3,8

00

6,0

50

6,6

30

3,7

20

6,0

00

6,5

90

3,6

80

5,6

50

6,6

30

3,8

60

5,9

80

6,7

50

3,2

60

5,6

70

6,0

50

3,8

60

6,1

40

6,5

80

3,2

70

5,4

20

6,4

10

3,4

20

5,7

60

6,2

70

3,4

30

5,8

10

6,5

80

3,6

90

5,9

40

6,8

30

Btu

/lb

6,6

00

10

,39

01

1,7

30

6,5

20

10

,54

01

1,6

90

6,8

40

10

,89

01

1,9

40

6,6

90

10,7

90

11

,86

0

6,6

20

10,1

80

11

,94

0

6,9

40

10

,76

01

2,1

60

5,8

80

10

,20

01

0,8

80

6,9

50

11

,05

01

1,8

40

5,8

90

9,7

60

11

,53

0

6,1

50

10

,36

01

1,2

90

6,1

70

10,4

50

11

,84

0

6,6

40

10

,70

01

2,3

00

Page 15: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tabl

e 2. Proximate an

d ultimate an

alys

es,

and

heat

-of-

comb

usti

on,

form

s-of

-sul

fur.

an

d ash-fusion-temperature determinations for

55 li

gnit

e sa

mple

s from

the

Fort

Unio

n Formation, Mc

Cone

, Ri

chla

nd,

Dawson,

and Wibaux C

ount

ies,

Mont., 'an

d Golden Va

lley

Coun

ty.

N. Dak. continued

Sample

number

D188118*

D188

120

D188121

D188122

D188

123

D188124

D188125

D188126

D188136

D188137

D188138

D188

140

Air-

drie

dlo

ss

24.8

28.1 ___

25.8

28.2

24.3 ___

25.5

27.9

27.0

36.2 _

37.1

29.7

28.5

Sulf

ate

0.01 .02

.02

.01

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

.00

.00

.00

.OIL

.02L

.02L

.01

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

B B B B B B .01

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

Form

s of

Pyri

tic

0.04 .06

.07

.04

.06

.07

.06

.10

.10

.04

.06

.07

.25

.38

.45

.41

.64

.72

.06

.10

.11

.04

.06

.07

B B B B B B .09

.15

.17

.10

.16

.19

sulf

ur Orga

nic

0.23 .36

.41

.17

.27

.30

.29

..4

6.51

.13

.21

.23

.55

.84

.99

.63

.98

1.10 .15

.26

.28

.20

.32

.34

B B B B B B .48

.81

.92

.89

1.43

1.65

Ash

fusi

on temperature,

°C

Init

ial

deformation

Softening

Fluid

1,265

1,320

1,37

0

1,28

5 1,330

1,38

0

1,235

1,29

0 1,

340

1,20

5 1,255

1,32

0

1,095

1,155

1,20

5

1,18

0 1,230

1,29

0

1,415

1,46

5 1,

520

1,29

0 1,

345

1,39

5

B B

B

B B

B

1,07

5 1,130

1,190

1,075

1,12

5 1,

180

Page 16: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tnbl

e 2. Proximate and

ulti

mate an

alys

es,

and he

at-o

E-co

mbus

tion

, forms-of-sulfur, an

d ash-fusion-temperature de

term

inat

ions

for

55 li

gnit

e sa

mp

les

fro

mth

e F

ort

U

nion

F

orm

atio

n,

McC

one

County

, N

. D

ak. co

nti

nu

ed

, R

ich

lan

d,

Daw

son,

an

d

Wlb

aux

Co

un

ties,

M

ont

Pro

xim

ate

an

aly

sis

Sam

ple

«_i-

_*i-

num

ber

D18

8141

D18

8142

*

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

Mois

ture

41

.9 .

36

.0

39.3

38.1

38.4

-'

40

.4

37.0

36.4

36.6

39

.6

39

.6

37.9

Vola

tile

matt

er

23

.64

0.6

45.1

26

.84

1.9

46

.4

26

.042.8

49.2

27

.544.4

50.6

30

.048.7

56.5

25

.84

3.3

47

.3

27.3

43

.348.1

26.5

41

.749.1

26.3

41

.55

0.8

26

.644.0

50.6

27

.04

4.7

50

.0

24.4

39.3

47

.7

Fix

edca

rbon

28.7

49

.454.9

30.9

48

.35

3.6

26

.844.2

50.8

26

.843.3

49

.3

23.1

37.5

43.5

28

.84

8.3

52

.7

29.4

46.7

51

.9

27

.643.4

51.1

26.6

42

.05

1.4

26

.043.0

49.4

27.0

44

.75

0.0

26.7

43

.05

2.3

Ash

5.8

10

.0

6.3

9.8

7.9

13.0

7.5

12.1

8.5

13.8

5.0

8.4

6.3

10.0

9.6

15.1

11.6

18.3

7.8

12.9

6.4

10.6

11.0

17.7

Hyd

roge

n

6.9

3.9

4.3

6.9

4.5

5.0 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 7.2

4.6

5.2

6.7

4.0

4.9

.,

and G

old

en V

all

ej

Ult

imate

an

aly

sis

Car

bon

37

.865.1

72.3

41.3

64.5

71.6 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B

38.5

63.7

71.3

37.0

59.6

72.4

Nit

rog

en

0.6 1.0

1.1 .7

1.1

1.2 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B .7

1.2

1.3 .6

1.0

1.2

Oxy

gen

48.4

19.2

21.3

44.4

19.4

21.5 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B

46.9

19.4

21.7

42.8

14.7

17.8

Sulf

ur

0.4 .7 .8 .3 .5 .5 .9 1.5

1.7 .8

1.3

1.5 .5 .8 .9 .3 .5 .5 .5 .8 .9 .3 .5 .6 .4 .6 .8

1.5

2.5

2.9 .3 .5 .6 1.8

2.9

3.5

Hea

t of

com

bu

stio

n

Kca

l/kg

3,4

70

5,9

70

6,6

30

3,8

30

5,9

80

6,6

30

3,3

30

5,4

80

6,3

00

3,5

10

5,6

60

6,4

50

3,3

80

5,4

90

6,3

60

3,4

20

5,7

40

6,2

70

3,6

10

5,7

20

6,3

60

3,3

80

5,3

20

6,2

70

3,3

40

5,2

60

6.4

40

3,4

40

5,6

90

6,5

40

3,6

10

5,9

70

6,6

80

3,5

00

5,6

30

6,8

40

Btu

/lb

6,2

40

10

,74

011,9

30

6,8

90

10

,76

01

1,9

40

5,9

90

9,8

70

11,3

40

6,3

10

10,2

00

11,6

00

6,0

80

9,8

70

11,4

60

6,1

60

10

,34

011,2

90

6,4

90

10

,30

011,4

50

6,0

90

9,5

80

11

,28

0

6,0

10

9,4

80

11,6

00

6,1

90

10

,25

01

1,7

70

6,4

90

10,7

50

12,0

30

6,2

90

10,1

40

12,3

20

Page 17: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 2. Pro

xima

te an

d ul

timate an

alys

es,

and he

at-o

f-co

mbus

tion

, forms-of-sulfur, an

d ash-fusion-temperaturg de

term

inat

ions

for

55 li

gn

ite

sam

ple

s fr

om

the

Fort

U

nion

F

orm

atio

n,

McC

one,

R

ich

lan

d,

Daw

son,

an

d W

ibau

x C

ounti

es,

M

ont.

, an

d G

old

en V

alle

yC

ounty

, N

. D

ak. conti

nued

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8141

D18

8142

*

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

Air

-dri

ed

loss

29.7

25.5

35.5

34.2

34.7

36.7

33.3

_

33.0

32.1

36

.2 -

27.1

28.6

Sulf

ate

0.0

1.0

2.0

2

.01

.02

.02

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B .01

.02

.02

.01

.02

.02

For

ms

of

Py

riti

c

0.0

6.1

0.1

1

.06

.09

.10

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B .06

.10

.11

1.4

92

.40

2.9

2

sulf

ur Org

anic

0.3

3.5

7.6

3

.25

.39

.43

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B .27

.45

.50

.32

.52

.63

Ash

fu

sion

tem

pera

ture

, °C

Init

ial

def

orm

atio

n

Soft

enin

g

Flu

id

1,1

55

1,2

05

1,2

55

1,1

30

1

,18

0

1,2

35

B B

B

B B

B

B B

B

B B

B

B B

B

B B

B

B B

B

B B

B

1,1

75

1

,23

5

1,2

85

1,1

55

1

,20

5

1,2

65

Page 18: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tabl

e 2. Proximate and

ulti

mate

analyses,

and

heat-of-combustion,

form

s-of

-sul

fur.

an

d as

h-fu

sion

-tem

pera

ture

determinations fo

r55

li

gnit

e

sam

ple

s fr

omth

e F

ort

U

nion

F

orm

atio

n,

McC

one,

County

, N

. D

ak. co

nti

nu

edR

ich

lan

d,

Daw

son,

an

d W

ibau

x C

ounti

es,

M

ont.

Pro

xim

ate

an

aly

sis

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

Mo

istu

re

38.6

36.5

36.4

37.9

36.8

39

.1

26.3

39.1

33.1

33.4

37

.3

35.9

Vo

lati

le

matt

er

27.1

44.1

50.7

27.9

43.9

51.6

26

.5

41.7

49.7

24.6

3

9.6

48.8

24.6

38.9

49.3

25.8

42.4

48.8

26.6

36.1

53.2

25.6

42.0

47.9

22.8

34.1

52.7

24.6

36.9

45.8

26.4

42.1

49.1

24.5

38.2

51.8

Fix

ed

carb

on

26.3

42.8

49.3

26.2

4

1.3

4

8.4

26.8

42.1

5

0.3

25.8

41.5

51.2

25.3

40.0

50.7

27.1

44.5

51.2

23.4

31.8

46.8

27.9

45.8

52.1

20.5

30.6

47.3

29.1

43.7

54.2

27.4

43.7

50.9

22.8

35.6

48.2

Ash

8.0

13.0

9-4

H

.8

10.3

16.2

11.7

18.8

13.3

2

1.0

8.0

13.1

23.7

32.2

7.4

12.2

23

.6

35.3

12.9

19.4

8.9

14.2

16.8

26.2

Hyd

roge

n

7.0

4.4

5

.1

6.8

4.3

5.1

6.8

4

.3

5.2

6.6

3.8

4

.7

6.3

3

.5

4.4

6.9

4.2

4.8

5.2

3

.1

4.6

6.7

3.9

4.4

5.9

3.3

5.1

6.1

3.6

4.4

6.8

4.2

4

.9

6.6

4.1

5

.5

, an

d G

old

en

Val

ley

Ult

imat

e an

aly

sis

Car

bon

37.4

6

0.9

70.0

34.3

54.0

63.4

37.5

59.0

70.4

35.5

57.2

70.4

33.8

53.5

67.7

37.4

61.4

70.7

29.2

39.6

58.4

37.9

62.2

70.8

28.6

42.8

66.1

38.3

57.5

71.3

38.5

61.4

71.6

33.0

51.5

69.8

Nit

rogen

0.7

1.1

1

.3 .7

1.1

1.3 .6

.9

1.1 .4

.6

.8 .5

.8

1

.0 .6

1.0

1.1 .5

.7

1.0 .5

.8

.9 .4

.6

.9 .6

.9

1.1 '.& .9 .5

.8

l.

l

Oxy

gen

45.8

18.7

21.5

44.8

19.5

22.8

43.8

18.0

21.5

44.6

17.6

21.6

42.6

15.6

19.8

46.2

18.8

21.6

29.7

8.6

12.6

46.7

19.6

22.3

39.4

14.9

23.0

41.7

18.0

22.4

44.4

17.9

20.9

41.9

15.6

21.1

Su

lfu

r

1.1

1.8

2.1

4.0

6

.3

7.4 .9

1

.4

1.7 1.2

1.9

2.4

3.5

5.5

7

.0

1.0

1.6

1

.9

11.7

15.9

23.4 .7 1.1

1.3

2.1

3.1

4.8 .3 .5 .6 .9

1-

4 1

.7

1.1

1.7

2.3

Hea

t o

f co

mb

ust

ion

Rea

l /kg

3,5

00

5

,70

0

6,5

60

3,2

40

5,1

10

6,0

00

3,4

40

5,4

20

6,4

60

3,2

60

5,2

50

6,4

70

3,2

00

5,0

70

6,4

20

3,4

80

5,7

20

6,5

80

2,9

60

4,0

20

5,9

20

3,4

60

5,6

70

6,4

60

2,6

90

4

,02

0

6,2

00

3,4

40

5,1

70

6,4

10

3,5

50

5

,66

0

6,6

00

3,1

20

4

,86

0

6,5

90

Btu

/lb

6,3

00

10

,26

0

11

,80

0

5,8

40

9

,20

0

10

,79

0

6,2

00

9,7

50

11

,63

0

5,8

70

9,4

50

11

,64

0

5,7

70

9

,12

0

11,5

60

6,2

70

1

0,2

90

1

1,8

50

5,3

30

7

,23

0

10

,66

0

6,2

20

10

,21

0

11,6

20

4,8

40

7,2

30

11

,17

0

6,2

00

9

,30

0

11

,54

0

6,3

90

10,1

90

11

,88

0

5,6

10

8,7

50

1

1,8

60

Page 19: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table

2. Proximate and

ultimate analyses,

and

heat-of-combustion,

form

s-of

-sul

fur.

and

ash-fusion-temperature determinations fo

r

I-1

00

55 li

gnit

eCo

unty

, N.

samp

les

from

the

Fort Un

ion

Formation, Mc

Cone

, Ri

chla

nd,

Daws

on,

and

Wiba

ux Counties,

Mont., and

Golden Va

lley

Dak.

continued

Form

s of su

lfur

Sample

number

D196

641

D196

642

D196

643

D196

645

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

Air-dried

loss

24.4

25.1

24.5

26.5

24.6

25.6

16.1

26.6

22.9

19.6

24.6

24. A

Sulf

ate

0.09

.15

.17

.95

1.50

1.76 .09

.14

.17

.10

.16

.20

.41

.65

.82

.05

.08

.09

.82

1.11

1.64 .08

.13

.15

.45

.67

1.04 .03

.05

.06

.05

.08

.09

.12

.19

.25

Pyri

tic

0.42

.68

.79

1.41

2.

22

2.61 .45

.71

.84

.71

1.14

1.

41

2.34

3.

70

4.69 .38

.62

.72

8.40

11.40

16.8

0

.23

.38

.43

.67

1.00

1.55 .10

.15

.19

.42

.67

.78

.25

.39

.53

Orga

nic

0.55

.90

1.03

1.63

2.57

3.01 .41

.64

.77

.40

.64

.79

.70

1.11

1.40 .54

.89

1.02

2.46

3.34

4.92 .41

.67

.77

.96

1.43

2.22 .21

.32

.39

.42

.67

.78

.74

1.15

1.56

Ash

fusion temperature

Init

ial

defo

rmat

ion

1,20

0

1,250

1,325

1,100

1,045

1,180

1,215

1,250

1,16

5

1,17

5

1,190

1,17

0

Soft

enin

g

1,215

1

1,275

1

1,375

1

1,120

1

1,060

1

1,20

0 1

1,23

0 1

1,275

1

1,175

1

1,195

1

1,205

1

1,200

1

, °C Fl

uid

,230

,345

,590

,-19

0

,075

.

,215

,250

,305

,195

,210

,225

,320

Page 20: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tabl

e 2. Proximate an

d ultimate

an

alys

es,

and

heat

-of-

comb

usti

on,

forms-of-sulfur, and

ash-fusion-temperature determinations for

55 li

gnit

e sa

mple

s fr

om the

Fort

Union

Formation, Mc

Cone

. Richland,

Daws

on,

and

Wjba

ux Counties.

Mont

., an

d Go

lden

Valley

Couiyty, N. Dak. continued

Pro

xim

ate

analy

sis

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6655

D19

6657

D19

6658

D19

6659

D19

6661

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D19

6628

D19

6629

D19

6630

Mo

istu

re

36.9

38.2

37.5

39.4

32.6

36.3

39.9

38

.3

34.3

40.4

39.2

26.2

Vola

tile

m

att

er

26

.2

41

.5

49

.0

25

.8

41

.7

47

.7

22

.5

36

.0

49

.8

24

.8

40

.9

49

.5

25

.4

37

.7

52

.2

25

.9

40

.7

48

.6

26

.4

43

.9

51

.4

26

.5

42

.9

49

.5

22

.9

34

.9

51

.1

25

.4

42

.6

48

.5

28

.3

46

.5

52

.3

38

.8

52

.6

59

.3

Fix

ed

carb

on

27.3

43.3

51.0

28.3

45.8

52.3

22.7

36.3

50.2

25.3

41.7

50.5

23.3

34.6

47.8

27.4

43.0

51.4

25

.0

41.6

48.6

27.0

43.8

50.5

21.9

33-3

48.9

27.0

45.3

51.5

25.8

42.4

47.7

26.6

36.0

40.7

Ash

9.6

15.2

7.7

12.5

17.3

27.7

10.5

17.3

18.7

27.7

10.4

16.3

8.7

14.5

8.2

13.3

20.9

31.8

7.2

12.1

6.7

11.0

8.4

11.4

Hyd

roge

n

6.7

4

.1

4.9

6.9

4.3

4

.9

6.2

3.3

4.5

6.8

4.0

4.8

5.8

3.2

4

.5

6.5

3

.9

4.6 7.0

4

.3

5.0

6-8

4

.1

4.8

5.9

3

.24.7 7.0

4.2

4

.8 7.3

4.8

5.4

7.0

5

.5

6.3

Ult

imate

analy

sis

Car

bon

37.5

59.4

70.1

37.9

61.3

70.1

31.9

5

1.0

70.6

35.7

58.9

71.3

30.5

4

5.3

62.6

37.6

5

9.0

70.5

34.8

57.9

67.7

37.8

61.3

70.7

30.8

46.9

68.7

36.4

61.1

69.5

37.7

6

2.0

69.7

39.3

53.3

60.1

Nit

rog

en

0.6

1.0

1.

1 .6

1.0

1.

1 .4

.6

.9 .5

.8

1.0 .4

.6 .8 .6

.9

1

.1 .4

.7 .8 .6

1.0

1.

1 .5

.8

1.1 .6

1

.0

1.1 .7

1

.2

1.3 .7

.9

1.

1

Oxy

gen

44.3

18.2

21.5

46.5

20.3

23.2

42.4

14.5

20.1

45.6

17.5

21.1

36.3

10.9

15.0

43.3

17.3

20.7

48.6

21.9

25.6

45.9

19.2

22.2

38.9

12.8

18.8

48.4

21.0

23.8

46.7

19.5

21.9

43.6

27.5

31.1

Su

lfu

r

1.4

2.2

2

.6 .4

.6

.7

1.8

2.9

4.0 .9

1

.51.8

8.4

12.5

17.2

1.5

2.4

2

.8 .6

1.0

1

.2 .8

1.3

1

.5

3.2

4.9

7

.1 .5

.8

1.0 .9

1

.5

1.7

1.1

1.5

1.7

Hea

t o

f co

mb

ust

ion

Rea

l /kg

3,4

40

5

,45

0

6,4

30

3,4

90

5

,65

0

6,4

50

2,8

60

4,5

80

6,3

30

3,2

70

5,3

90

6,5

20

3,0

00

4

,45

0

6,1

60

3,5

50

5,5

70

6,6

50

3,2

60

5,4

30

6,3

50

3,4

50

5,5

90

6,4

40

2,7

80

4,2

30

6

,20

0

3,3

30

5,5

90

6,3

50

3,6

10

5,9

30

6,6

70

3,7

20

5,0

40

5,6

90

Btu

/lb

6,1

90

9

,81

0

11,5

70

6,2

80

10,1

60

11

,61

0

5,1

50

8

,24

0

11,4

00

5,8

80

9,7

00

11

,74

0

5,4

00

8

,01

0

11

,08

0

6,3

80

10,0

20

11,9

70

5,8

80

9,7

80

1

1,4

30

6,2

00

10,0

50

11

,59

0

5,0

00

7

,61

0

11

,15

0

5,9

90

10,0

50

11

,44

0

6,4

90

10

,68

0

12

,00

0

6,7

00

9,0

80

10,2

40

Page 21: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table

2. Proximate and

ultimate an

alys

es,

and

heat

-of-

comb

usti

on,

forms-of-sulfur, and

ash-fusion-temperature determinations for

55 li

gnit

e sa

mple

s fr

om th

e Fort Un

ion

Formation. Mc

Cone

. Ri

chla

nd,

Daws

on,

and

Wiba

ux Co

unti

es.

Mont«. and Golden Valley

Coun

ty,

N. Dak. continued

Forms

of su

lfur

Ash

fusi

on temperature,

°C

K3

O

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6655

D19

6657

D19

6658

D19

6659

D19

6661

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D19

6628

D19

6629

D19

6630

Air

-dri

ed

loss

25.6

-

25.3

26.2

27

.2

20.8

_

21

.6 .

27.2

__

-

23.8

22.3

26

.9__

_

23

.4

23

.4 .

Sulf

ate

0.2

7.4

3.5

0

.01

.02

.02

.29

.46

.64

.04

.07

.08

.54

.80

1.1

1

.07

.11

.13

.OIL

.OIL

.OIL

.03

.05

.06

.31

.47

.69

.03

.05

.06

.01

.02

.02

.16

.22

.24

Py

riti

c

0.7

21

.14

1.3

5

.09

.15

.17

1.02

1.6

32.2

6

.72

1.19

1.44

7.5

51

1.2

01

5.5

0

1.03

1.62

1.93 .04

.07

.08

.48

.78

.90

2.0

23.0

74

.51

.29

.49

.55

.18

.30

.33

.15

.20

.23

Org

anic

0.4

4.7

0.8

2

.34

.55

.63

.51

.82

1.1

3

.19

.31

.38

.31

.46

.64

.41

.64

.77

.52

.87

1.01 .2

5.4

1.4

7

.82

1.2

51.

83 .16

.27

.31

.71

1.1

71

.31

.79

1.0

71.2

1

Init

ial

def

orm

atio

n

1,1

50

1,2

00

1,1

00

1,1

50

1,2

10

1,0

60

1,1

65

1,2

45

1,1

30

1,2

40

1,2

40

1,2

20

So

ften

ing

1,1

65

1,2

20

1,1

25

1,16

5

1,2

40

1,0

80

1,1

95

1,2

65

1,1

60

1,25

5

1,2

55

1,2

50

Flu

id

1,1

80

1,2

30

1,2

55

1,1

80

1,2

90

1,1

00

1,2

40

1,2

90

1,1

90

1,2

70

1,2

70

1,2

75

Page 22: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 2. Proximate and ultimate analyses, an

d heat-of-combustion. forms-of-sulfur. an

d ash-fusion-temperature determinations fo

r55

li

gn

ite

County

, N

.sa

mp

les

fro

m

the

Fort

U

nion

F

orm

atio

n,

McC

one,

R

ich

lan

d,

Daw

son,

an

d W

ibau

x C

ounti

es,

M

ont.

, an

d G

old

en

Val

ley

Dak

. co

nti

nu

ed

Pro

xim

ate

analy

sis

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6631

D19

6632

D19

6634

D19

6635

D19

6637

D19

6638

D19

6640

Mois

ture

35.4

39.7

37.0

37.8

43.4

40.6

40.9

Vo

lati

le

matt

er

30

.0

46.4

52.5

24.9

41.3

47.6

24.3

38.6

48.5

25.1

40.4

46.8

22

.2

39.2

49.6

24.7

41.6

48.1

24.3

41.1

47.1

Fix

ed

carb

on

27.1

42.0

47.5

27.4

45.4

52.4

25.8

41.0

51.5

28.5

45.8

53.2

22.6

39.9

50.4

26.6

44.8

51.9

27-3

46.2

52.9

Ash

7.5

11.6

8.0

13.3

12.9

20.5

8.6

13.8

11.8

20.8

8.1

13.6

7.5

12.7

Hyd

roge

n

6.9

4.6

5.2

6.8

4.0

4.6

6.5

3.8

4

.8

6.6

3

.9

4.5

6.9

3

.7

4.6 6.9

4.0

4

.7

6.8

3

.8

4.4

Ult

imate

an

aly

sis

Car

bon

40.1

62.1

70.2

37.4

62.0

71.5

32.8

52.1

65.5

38.0

61.1

70.9

30.9

54.6

69.0

36.1

60.8

70.4

36

.2

61.3

70.2

Nit

rogen

0.7

1.

1 1

.2 .6

1.0

1

.1 .4

.6

.8 .6

1.0

1.1 .5

.9

1

.1 .5

.8

1.0 .5 .8

1.0

Oxy

gen

44.4

20.0

22.7

46.5

18.6

21.4

44.8

18.9

23.8

45.6

19.3

22.4

49.1

18.6

23.5

47.6

19.4

22.4

48.0

1

9.7

22.6

Su

lfu

r

0.4

.6

.7 .8

1

.3

1.5

2.5

4.0

5.0 .6

1.0

1

.1 .9

1.6

2

.0 .7

1.2

1.4 .8

1.4

1.6

Hea

t o

f co

mbust

ion

Rea

l /kg

3,7

80

5,8

50

6

,61

0

3,4

30

5,6

90

6,5

60

3,1

30

4

,96

0

6,2

40

3,4

70

5,5

80

6,4

80

2,8

10

4

,97

0

6,2

80

3,2

80

5

,52

0

6,3

90

3,3

40

5,6

60

6,4

80

Btu

/lb

6,8

00

1

0,5

20

11,9

00

6,1

70

10,2

40

11,8

00

5,6

30

8,9

30

1

1,2

30

6,2

50

1

0,0

50

11,6

60

5,0

60

8

,95

0

11,3

00

5,9

00

9,9

30

11,5

00

6,0

20

10,1

80

11

,66

0

Page 23: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tabl

e 2. Proximate and

ulti

mate analyses,

and

heat

-of-

comb

usti

on,

form

s-of

-sul

fur,

an

d ash-fusion-temperature de

term

inat

ions

fo

r

ho

hO

55 li

gnit

e sa

mple

s fr

om th

e Fort Union

Form

atio

n, Mc

Cone

, , Richland,

Daws

on,

and

Wiba

ux Counties,

Mont

., an

d Golden Va

lley

Coun

ty,

N. Da

k. con

tinu

ed

Sample

number

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Air-dried

loss

22.6

26.2

24.3

21.8

32.6

30.1

29.9

Sulf ate

0.01

.02

.02

.02

.03

.04

.52

.83

1.04 .01

.02

.02

.11

.19

.25

.04

.07

.08

.04

.07

.08

Forms

of

Pyri

tic

0.01

.02

-02

.34

.56

.65

.90

1.43

1.80 .27

.43

.50

.45

.80

1.00 .40

.67

.78

.43

.73

.83

sulf

ur Orga

nic

0.38

.59

.67

.39

.65

.75

1.12

1.78

2.24 .34

.55

.63

.31

.55

.69

.28

.47

.55

.35

.59

.68

Ash

fusi

on

Init

ial

defo

rmat

ion

1,16

5

1,115

1,105

1,165

1,165

1,25

5

1,220

temp

erat

ure

Soft

enin

g

1,18

0 1

1,140

1

1,130

1

1,180

1

1,18

0 1

1,270

1

1,23

0 1,

°c Fluid

,210

,160

,190

,200

,200

,290

,250

Page 24: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tabl

e 3. Major- and

mino

r-oxide

and

trac

e el

emen

t composition

of the

labo

rato

ry ash

of 57 li

gnit

e sa

mple

s from the

Forr

Union

Form

atio

n, Mc

Cone

. Ri

chla

nd.

Daws

on,

and

Wiba

ux Counties,

Mont., an

d Golden Va

lley

Co

unty

. N. Dak.

[Lig

nite

as

hed

at 525° C.

L, le

ss th

an the

valu

e shown; G,

gr

eate

r th

an th

e va

lue

shown; N

not

detected;

B, no

t de

term

ined

. S

afte

r el

emen

t title

indi

cate

s de

term

inat

ions

by se

miqu

anti

tati

ve emission sp

ectr

ogra

phy.

The

spec

trog

raph

ic re

sult

s ar

e to be id

enti

fied

with ge

omet

ric

brac

kets

whose

boundaries are

part

of

th

e as

cend

ing

seri

es 0.12,

0.18

, 0.

26,

0.38,

0.56

, 0.

83,

1.2,

etc. bu

t re

port

ed as midp

oint

s of

th

e brackets,

0.1, 0.15,

0.2,

0.3, 0.

5, 0.

7, 1.

0, etc.

Precision

of th

e sp

ectr

ogra

phic

da

ta is

pl

us-o

r-mi

nus

one

brac

ket

at 68 pe

rcen

t or pl

us-o

r-tn

inus

two

brac

kets

at

95 pe

rcen

t confidence level]

OJ

Sample

numb

er

D188

118

D188

119

D188

120

D188

121

D188

122

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

140

D188

141

D188

142

D188

143

D188

128

D188

129

U188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

1)18

8134

1)18

8135

D188

144

D188

145

D196

641

D196

642

D196

643

D196

645

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

D196

655

D196

657

Ash

(per

cent

)

13.7 9.4

10.2 9.2

8.8

13.1

10.3 7.7

6.7

14.7 8.4

11.1

10.4

12.4 9.4

9.1

14.5

10.4

12.9 8.4

10.3

16.8

19-0

10-1 9.7

14.0

12.9

17.5

13-2

13-6

17.2

14.0

40.2

10.9

31.9

17.0

10.5

27.1

15.2

10.6

S102

(percent)

35 16 24 12 22 26 137.6

13 22 17 21 33 14 25 22 18 21 29 14 14 49 459.8

31 22 28 11 32 29 18 28 16 24 55 47 25 56 21 25

A1203

(per

cent

)

14 6.1

11 7.3

10 14 4.2

5.0

6.9

9.7

7.3

9.7

11 7.6

10 13 10 9.1

12 8.6

8.0

14 16 6.9

8.0

12 117.0

11 13 6.0

11 4.3

13 17 13 13 13 7.8

17

CaO

(percent)

25 35 32 28 29 24 24 40 36 21 37 22 13 18 22 24 22 28 22 36 29 14 16 26 24 19 14 8.6

14 14 9.1

12 2-3

19 3.7

11 16 5.1

11 15

MgO

(per

cent

)

7.55

7.63

7.85

7.10

7.10

5.05

5.98

11.8 9.38

5.80

'

10.6 5.25

3.65

4.70

6.13

6.20

6.45

8.85

7.05

12.4

10.3 4.78

5.43

7.10

7.43

3.65

5.90

4.10

6.40

5.70

3.70

4.60 .95

7.00

2.08

4.90

6.10

3.10

4.10

5.90

Na20

(per

cent

)

2.00

3.33

3.45

8.75

9.28

4.30

6.83

2.48

3.28 .30

.35

8.43

8.60

8.05

10.6

11.1 .2

3.3

0.33

.34

.32

.24

.35

.18

2.95

6.78 .37

.21

1.07

2.86

2.25

2.80 .62

3.02

1.09

1.89

1.77

1.70

2.31

6.80

K20

(per

cent

)

0.84 .60

.61

.33

.39

.45

.37

.40

.39

.84

.28

1.0

1.5 .33

.50

.55

.36

.46

.73

.35

.39

2.5

1.5 .33

.64

.37

1.0 .50

1.1 .50

.70

1.2 .70

.50

1.9 .80

.60

3.0 .60

.40

Fe203

(per

cent

)

3.3

6.4

3.8

9.7

2.1

7.5

15 5.3

7.5

15

.65

6.6

6.4

16 4.3

4.8

16 7.5

7.2

3.0

8.4

2.0

2.7

207.5

13 7.3

368.

34.

5

245.

953 4.

06.

0

2.8

8.3

5.5

19 3.7

T102

(per

cent

)

0.57 .55

.53

.27

.44

.61

.43

.58

.61

.48

.49

.86

.66

.95

1.1

1.0 .69

.77

.66

.52

.80

.75

.83

.40

.77

1.1 .60

.20

.60

1.1 .80

.40

.10

.70

.50

.90

.40

.50

.60

.50

P205

(per

cent

)

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.XJ

Ll.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL

l.OL .07

.08L

.61

.22

.06L

07L

.02L

.18

.03L

.12

.19

04L

.13

.09L

Samp

le

number

D188

118

D188

119

D188

120

D188

121

D188

122

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

140

D188

141

D188

142

D188

143

D188

128

D188

129

D188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

D188

134

D188

135

D188

144

D188

145

D196

641

D196

642

D196

643

D196

645

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

D196

655

D196

657

Page 25: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tabl

e 3.

Ma.

1 or-

and

minor-oxide

and

trac

e el

emen

t composition

of th

e laboratory as

h of 57

li

gnit

e sa

mple

s from th

e Fo

rt Un

ion

Form

atio

n,

McC

one,

R

lch

lan

d,

Daw

son,

an

d W

lbau

x C

ounti

es

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D

1881

38D

1881

40D

1881

41JH

8814

2

D18

8143

D18

8L28

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8L32

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

664L

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

S03

(perc

en

t)

5.2

12 9.6

22 6.4

17 30 5.8

11 26 13 22 23 29 13 10 27 18 13 13 20 4.9

7.9

32 17 247

.98.7

7.9

7.7

11 12 5.5

9.0

3.7

3.5

9-9

4.8

12 6.8

Ag-

S

(ppm

)

N N N N N N N- N N N N N N N N N 3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

B-S

(p

pm)

700

1,5

00

1,5

00

1,5

00

1,5

00

700

700

700

1,5

00

500

1,0

00

1,0

00

700

700

700

700

700

700

700

700

700

300

300

700

1,5

00

700

1,0

00

700

1,0

00

1,0

00

700

1,5

00

200

1,5

00

500

1,0

00

1,5

00

500

700

1,5

00

Ba-

S

(ppm

)

700

3,0

00

300

700

500

2,0

00

700

7,0

00

3,0

00

1,5

00

300

10,0

00

7,0

00

7,0

00

10,0

00

15

,00

07,0

00

3,0

00

500

1,5

00

7,0

00

1,5

00

1,5

00

700

2,0

00

7,0

00

3,0

00

150

1,0

00

20,0

00

20,0

00

500

1,0

00

3,0

00

700

3,0

00

1,0

00

1,0

00

5,0

00

500

Be-

S

(ppm

)

N N N N 5 N N N 5 3

N 10 15

N15

7 5 3 7 N N N 3 N10 7 15 20

3 3 3 7 10 3 7 3 5 10 3 10

, M

on

t.,

and

Go

lden

V

alle

y

Co

un

ty

Cd

(ppm

)

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L3.0 l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

.l.

OL

l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

Cu

(ppm

)

35 33 54 37 44 37 44 29 60 35 46

79 73 33 52 62 37 66 68 46 39 50 93 33 64 37 132 48 72 39 35 62 44 44 93 44 49 90 42 65

Ga-

S

(ppm

)

30 15 30 15 15 30 15 10 20 15 15

30 70 20 30 50 15 30 15 15 15 30 30 15 30 30 70 70 15 30 20 30B

20 30 30 30 70 15 50

, N

. D

ak. co

nti

nu

ed

Ge-

S

(ppm

)

N N N N N N N N N N N N30

N N

20N N N N N N N N N N

50 70N N N N N N N N N N N N

La-

S

(ppm

)

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N70 70

N70

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D

1881

3SD

1881

40D

1881

41D

1881

42

D18

8143

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

Page 26: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le 3

. M

ajo

r-

and

min

or-

ox

ide

and

trace

elem

ent

com

po

siti

on

o

f th

e la

bora

tory

as

h

of

57 li

gn

ite

sam

ple

s fr

om

th

e F

ort

U

nion

Fo

rmat

ion

, M

cCon

e,

Rlc

hla

nd

, D

awso

n,

and

Wlb

aux

Co

un

ties,

M

on

t.,

and

Gold

en

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8L23

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D18

8138

D18

8140

D18

8141

D18

8142

D18

8143

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

DL

8813

2D

1881

33D

1881

34D

1881

35D

1881

44

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

LI

(ppm

)

84 16 37 28 39 127 19 10

L20 46 28 37 27 31 39 55 40 28 45 40 49 43 84 25 34 77 42 31 41 52 17 35 14

138

101 69 99 43 35 78

Mn

(ppr

a)

405

1,5

30

695

785

840

625

725

860

960

490

970

630

300

430

360

350

525

635

550

1,1

10

1,1

50

505

610

525

855

530

530

330

640

1,0

00

490

520

245

1,1

70

285

660

950

360

800

1,0

40

Mo-

S (p

pm)

15 30 15 15 15 15 10 730 30 15 30 70 15 30 20 20 15 15

N

15N

15 20 30 20 20 70 10 10 30 30 50 15 30 10 15 50 20 30

Nb-

S

(ppm

)

N N30

N N

30N N N

20

N20 50

N30 20

N30 20

N

20 20 20N

20 20 30 50N N N

20L N N

20 20 20L

20L N N

Hi-

S

(ppr

a)

7 10 20 7 15 7 7 10 15 7 7 15 307 15 15 7

20 307 5 7 15 15 15 15 30 200 15 10 20 20 70 15 50 15 15 50 20 15

Pb

(ppm

)

50 25 50 40 25 40 30 35 40 50 25 45 30 25 45 45 35 40 35 50 40 30 40 35 30 45 30 30 30 40 25L

25L

25L

45 30 40 40 25L

25L

30

Sc-

S

(ppm

)

10N

10 7 15 7 N N 7 7 N15 30 7 15 20

N 7 15N N

15 15N

30 10 30 30 10L

15 10 20 15 10 30 10 15 30 10 20

Val

ley

Co

un

ty,

N.

Dak

. co

nti

nu

ed

Sr-

S

(ppm

)

3,0

00

5,0

00

5,0

00

7,0

00

7,0

00

3,0

00

7,0

00

7,0

00

5,0

00

1,5

00

3,0

00

3,0

00

2,0

00

5,0

00

5,0

00

7,0

00

1,5

00

3,0

00

1,5

00

3,0

00

3,0

00

1,5

00

2,0

00

700

2,0

00

3,0

00

500

1,0

00

1,5

00

2,0

00

2,0

00

1,5

00

500

2,0

00

700

2,0

00

2,0

00

1,0

00

2,0

00

1,5

00

V-S

(p

pm)

30 30 70 30 70 30 30 30 70 30 30 150

300 50 70 150 30 70 70 30 30 70 70 30 70 30

300

200 50 70 50 150 70 30 150 70 70 100 30 70

Y-S

(p

pm)

50 20 50 30 70 30 20 20 70 30 20 70 150 30 70 70 50 70 70 20 20 30 30 30 70 50 100

100 20 50 30 70 30 30 70 30 50 70 30 70

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D18

8138

D18

8140

D18

8141

D18

8142

D18

8143

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

Page 27: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le 3

. M

ajo

r-

and

min

or-

oxid

e an

d tr

ace

elem

ent

com

posi

tion

of

the

labora

tory

as

h

of

57 li

gn

ite

sam

ple

s fr

om

th

e F

ort

U

nion

Form

atio

n,

McC

one,

R

ich

lan

d,

Daw

son,

an

d W

ibau

x C

ou

nti

es,

M

on

t.,

and

Go

lden

V

alle

y C

ou

nty

, N

. D

ak. co

nti

nu

ed

Sam

ple

nu m

b e r

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D18

8138

D18

8140

D18

8141

D18

8U2

D18

8143

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

Yb-

S(p

pm)

3 2 3 3 7 3 3 3 5 5 3 7 15 3 7 7 5 5 7 2 2 3 5 3 7 5 15 15 3 3

B 7 B 3 7 3 5 10B 5

Zn (ppm

)

34 35 78 48 28 24 30 34 39 59 33 96 118 45 50 28 38 72 84 34 40 47 62 38 36 35

1,2

00

323

304 65 67 121

186 57

233 88 160

240

103

241

Zr-

S(p

pm)

150 30 100

150

150

150 30 30 70 70 70 150

150

150

150

200

100

100

150 70 70 100

150 70

150

150

300

500

100

150

100

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

100

200

Page 28: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le

3.

Majo

r-

and

min

or-

ox

ide

and

trace

elem

ent

com

posi

tion

of

the

lab

ora

tory

as

h

of

57 li

gnit

e

sam

ple

s fr

om

the

Fo

rt

Uni

onFo

rmat

ion,

Mc

Cone

, Richland,

Daws

on,

and

Wiba

ux

Sample

numb

er

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Ash

(per

cent

)

22-9

13.4

26.4

13.0

14.4

10.5

28.8

12.0

10.4

12.5

12.0

10.5

21.3

11.3

17.6

10.4

12.1

S102

(percent)

44 24 12 28 50 25 55 24 20 8.0

39 23 36 31 31 20 21

A1203

(per

cent

)

9-0

8.0

5.4

12 14 8.2

6.9

9-6

12 5.5

12 9.7

12 13 11 1] 11

CaO

(percent)

7.4

17 5.4

12 7.5

257.0

19 18 12 15 16 4.8

15 13 22 18

Coun

ties

,

MgO

(per

cent

)

4.60

-6.60

2.43

4.70

4.90

8.20

2.86

7.00

6.60

4.70

5.40

6.40

2.66

5.90

5.50

7.90

6.50

Mont., an

d

Na20

(per

cent

)

0.18 .26

.60

5.50 .76

.78

.19

.33

1.41

1.51

5.50

7.30

3.14

6.50 .83

1.13 .76

Golden Valley Co

unty

,

K20

(percent)

1.1 .80

.20

.70

2.3 .50

.80

.70

.40

.50

.70

.40

1.8 .60

.40

.50

.50

Fe203

(percent)

10 8.5

46 11 3.2

3-4

3-9

7.8

7.6

7.3

3-3

6.2

16 3.6

7.3

7.5

6.8

N. Da

k. con

tinu

ed

T102

(per

cent

)

1.2 .50

.20

.50

.60

.60

3.1 .60

.50

6.4 .70

.60

.60

.70

.80

.50

.50

P205

(per

cent

)

0.04L

.15

04L

.08L

.07L

.57

03L

.16

.10

.08L

-08L

.19

.05

.09L

06L

.48

.74

Sample

number

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6658

D19

6659

D19

6661

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D19

6628

D19

6629

D19

6630

D19

6631

D19

6632

D19

6634

D19

6635

D19

6637

D19

6638

D19

6640

S03

(perc

ent)

7.6

11 6.7

11 4.4

5.1

5.4 7.6

9.4

13 4.4 9.4

7.0

6.5 7.4

9.8

8.8

Ag-

S (p

pm)

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

B-S

(p

pm)

700

1,0

00

300

1,0

00

1,0

00

1,5

00

700

1,5

00

1,5

00

1,5

00

1,5

00

1,5

00

700

1,0

00

700

1,5

00

1,5

00

Ba-

S

(ppm

)

5,0

00

1,0

00

2,0

00

500

1,0

00

1,0

00

20,0

00

2,0

00

1,0

00

20.0

00G

1,0

00

2,0

00

700

3,0

00

1,0

00

2,0

00

3,0

00

Be-

S

(ppm

)

7 7 10 10 15 5 15 5 15 20 303 7 3 3 3 3

Cd

(ppm

)

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L4.0 l.O

L

l.O

L2

.0 l.O

Ll.

OL

l.O

L

l.O

Ll.

OL

Cu

(ppm

)

58 53 16 58 72 53 35 3720

3 72 67 39 116 39 72 35 35

Ga-

S

(ppm

)

30 20 20 30 70 20 50 30 50 100 50 20 70 30 30 15 15

Ge-

S

(ppm

)

N N30

N20

L N20

L N20

L70 50

N30

N20

L N20

L

La-

S

(ppm

)

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6658

D19

6659

D19

6661

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D19

6628

D19

6629

D19

6630

D19

6631

1)19

6632

D19

6634

D19

6635

D19

6637

D19

6638

D19

6640

Page 29: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le 3

. M

ajo

r-

and

min

or-

oxid

e an

d tr

ace

elem

ent

com

posi

tion

of

the

lab

ora

tory

as

h

of

57

lignit

e

sam

ple

s fr

om

th

e F

ort

U

nion

00

Fo

rmat

ion

, M

cCon

e,

Ric

hla

nd

, D

awso

n,

and

Wib

aux

Co

un

ties,

M

ont.

, an

d G

old

en

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6658

D19

6659

D

1966

61

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D

1966

28D

1966

29

D19

6630

D19

6631

D

1966

32D

1966

34

D19

6635

D19

6637

D19

6638

D19

6640

Li

(ppr

a)

41 32

33

53 41 33 41

39 52

10L

57

41 32

52 70 45 47

Mn

(ppm

)

185

680

150

490

285

1,8

00

180

800

740

255

740

960

290

1,2

40

590

1,2

20

1,4

80

Mo-

S(p

pm)

15 15

30

30 20 20 10

30 70

50 15

15 70

10 7 15 15

Nb-

S(p

pm)

20 20 N

20L

20L

20L

20L

20

L20

L70 30

20 50

20

L20

L N20

L

Ni-

S(p

pm)

20 15

15

15 15 10 15 10 30

50 20

1020

0 15 10 15 15

Pb (ppm

)

25L

35

30

45 40 35 25

35 30

25 50

40 45

40 35 45 25L

Sc-

S(p

pm)

15 15

15

15 50 15 30

15 20

30 30

10 30

10L

15 10L

10L

Val

ley

County

, N

. D

ak. co

nti

nu

ed

Sr-

S(p

pm)

1,0

00

1,5

00

1,0

00

2,0

00

1,5

00

2,0

00

1,5

00

2

,00

01,5

00

2,0

00

1,5

00

2,0

00

1,0

00

2,0

00

1,5

00

2,0

00

2,0

00

V-S

(ppm

)

70 70

30

70 150 70 100 70 150

300

150

50 300 50 70 15 30

Y-S

(ppr

a)

70 70

30

50 100 70 100

30 70

100

150

30 100 30 50 30 30

num

ber

D19

6658

D19

6659

D

1966

61

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D

1966

28D

1966

29

D19

6630

D19

6631

D

1966

32D

1966

34

D19

6635

D19

6637

D19

6638

D19

6640

Samp

le

nu mb e r

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Yb-S

(ppm)

7 7 B5 10 5 7 3 7 15 15 3 15 3 3 2 3

Zn

(ppm)

171 40

500 42 112 57 87 54

800

275

256

184

800

261

106 48 140

Zr-S

(ppm)

200

150

150

150

200

150

300

150

150

500

500

150

300

150

150

100

150

Page 30: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table

4. Content of

ni

ne tr

ace

elem

ents

in

57

li

gnit

e sa

mple

s fr

om the

Fort Union

Form

atio

n, Mc

Cone

, Ri

chla

nd,

VD

Daws

on,

and

Wibaux Co

unti

es, Mo

nt.,

an

d

[Analyses

In ai

r-dr

ied

(32°

C)

lignite.

Samp

le

number

D188

118

D188

119

D188

120

D188

121

D188

122

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

140

D188

141

DL88

142

D188

143

D188

128

D188

129

D188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

D188

134

D188

135

D188

144

D188

145

D196

641

D196

642

D196

643

D196

645

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

D196

655

D196

657

As

(ppm)

1.9

2.7

2.5 .7 .9

1.5

1.7

1.2

2.7

6.0 .9

6.3

15 4.8

l.OL

3-1

4.2

6.4

110 1.

3

2.1

2.5

451.9

1.3

5.6

13180 8.

35.

6

28 33 170 2.

619 3.

53.

523 19 18

Co

(ppm)

0.6 .5

2.0 .4

1.0 .5 .9 .4

1.1

1.2 .5

1.1

2.1 .7

1.5 .8 .7

2.5

2.7 .4 .4

1.2

1.3

2.0

1.5

1.1

4.9

431.3 .6

1.0

1.3

8.4 .9

7.7

1.0

1.0

6.7

1.7

1.2

Cr

(ppm)

3.2

1.9

4.2

1.3

2.0

3.1

1.7

1.0

2.2

3.4

1.2

3.5

5.1

2.0

3.0

2.4

2.5

2.7

4.5

1.5

1.8

12 7.9

1.4

3.2

3.0

14 9.1

6.0

3.6

4.3

7.3

15 2.4

22 6.3

3-3

20 4.3 .1L

F (ppm)

40 25 30 25 40 45 30 30 30 45 45 45 55 30 45 60 20L

25 40 20L

25 150

100 30 20 25 45 25 50 30 25 45 50 25 180 45 30

190 25 25

Hg

(ppm)

0.08 .16

.03

.05

. -03

-08

.08

.02

.03

.10

.02

.05

.05

03

.03

.03

.20

.08

.24

.03

.09

.06

.24

.07

.04

.10

.08

.79

.14

.09

.21

.11

.74

.08

.46

.10

.15

.18

.18

.13

Gold

Valley Co

unty

, N

. Da

k.

L, less th

an the va

lue

show

n]

Sb

(ppm

)

0-3 .2 .4 .2 .3 .3 .2 .1 .3 .8 .1

1.1

2.5 .6 .6 .9 .5

1.0

1.0 .2 .2 .6

1.0 .1 .4 .6

2.1

11.7 .3 .9

1.4

4.0 .3

2.9 .4 .5

3.8

1.8 .8

Se

(ppm)

0.9 .3 .4 .5 .4

1.2 .6 .3 .4 .8 .4 .6 .4 .6 .1L

.5 .5 .81.1 .7 .7 .7 .9 .7 .6 .8 .8

1.7

1.0 .7 .4 .4 .8 .1L

.8 .8 .5 .1L

.1L

.7

Th

(ppm)

2.7 .5

1.8 .9

1.1

2.5 .9 .4 .9

2.1 .7

1.3

1.7

1.5

1.7

1.8

2.4

1.7

2.5

1.0

1.2

3.1

3.7 .9

1.5

2.1

2.8

3.5

2.4

2.1

1.8

1.6 .1L

1.8

5.7

3.8

1.6

4.3

2.3

2.4

U (ppm)

1.5

2.1

1.7

1.0

1.2

2.1

1.1 .2L

1.2

3.1 .8

2.9

6.5

1.4

1.2

1.9

2.5

1.7

1.8 .7 .9

1.6

2.2

131.8

1.6

13 17 1.5

1.5

2.2

2.9

5.4 .9

7.4

1.5

1.2

16 1.8

1.4

Samp

le

number

D188

118

D188

119

D188

120

D188

121

D188

122

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

140

D188

141

D188

142

D188

143

D188

128

D188

129

D188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

D188

134

D188

135

D188

144

D188

145

D196

641

D196

642

D196

6A3

D196

645

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

D196

655

D196

657

Page 31: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 4. Content of

nine trace elements in 57 lignite samples from the

Fort Union Formation, HcCone, Richland,

u> o

Dawson, and

Wibaux Counties, Mont., an

d Gold Valley County, N. Dak

Sample

number

D196658

D196659

D196661

D196662

D196624

D196625

D196

627

D196628

D196629

D196630

D196631

D196632

D196634

D196635

D19663"?

D196638

D196640

As (ppm)

19 10 228.4

8.9

2.2

10 4.6

15 19 5.2

4.5

63 6.3

7.1

6.6

1.6

Co (ppm)

2.6 .9

2.3

1.5

1.6

1.1

2.0 .8

3.0

6.2

3.1 .5

28 .7 .6 .63.5

Cr (ppra)

8.6

6.2

4.5

4.0

9.8

3.6

143.7

4.0

6.3

5.1

3.0

29 3.3

6.3

1.7

2.8

F(ppm)

55 25 20L

30 90 20 40 20 20 20 25 25 110 35 20 20 25

Hg

(ppm)

0.12

.14

.56

.19

.06

.06

.18

.06

.23

.10

.06

.15

1.23

.11

.24

.15

.08

Sb (ppr

a)

3.6 .4

1.5

1.0

1.9 .4

2.0 .4

1.1

4.7

1.1 .4

7.3 .4 .8 .6 .3

Se (ppm)

1.3 .7 .9 .5 .6 .7

1.2 .6 .5 .6

1.0 .7

1.1 .7

1.6 .1L

.6

. continued

Th (ppm

)

3.7

2.7

2.5

2.1

2.5

2.4

5.3

2.0

1.6

1.1

3.6

1.8

5.7

2.3

4.4

1.4

1.8

U(ppm)

5.2

2.1

1.8

1.8

11

.89.8

2.7

2.4

10 4.1 .9

13.8

4.3 .9

1.2

Sample

number

D196658

D196659

D196661

D196662

D196624

D196625

D196627

D196628

D196629

D196630

D196631

D196632

D196634

D196635

D196637

D196638

D196640

Page 32: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 5. Major-, mi

nor-

, and trace-element co

mpos

itio

n of 57 lignite samples from the

Fort Union Formation. HcCone, Richland,

Dawson. and Wtbaux Counties, Mont., an

d Golden Valley County, N.

Dak.

[Val

ues

in percent or

parts per million.

As,

Co,

Cr,

F, Hg,

Sb,

Se,

Th,

and

U values are

from direct determinations on air-dried

(32°

C) li

gnit

e; all other values calculated from analyses of lignite as

h-

S means analysis by emission spectrography; L,

less

than

th

e value shown; G,

greater th

an the

value sh

own;

N,

not

detected; B,

not determined]

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D18

8138

D18

8140

D188U

ID

1881

42

D18

8U3

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

Si

(perc

en

t)

2.2 .7

0l.

l .52

.90

1.6 .6

3.2

7.4

11.5 .6

71

.1 1.6 .8

11.1 .9

31.2

1.0

1.7 .5

5

.67

3.8

4.0 .4

61

.4

1.4 1.7 .9

02.0 1.8

1.4

1.8

3.0

1.2

8.2

3.7 1.2

7.1 1.5

1.2

Al

(perc

en

t)

1.0 .3

0.5

9.3

6.4

7

.97

.23

.20

.24

.75

.32

.57

.61

.50

.50

.63

.77

.50

.82

.38

.44

1.2

1.6 .3

7.4

1

.89

.75

.65

.77

.94

.55

.81

.91

.75

2.9 1.2 .7

21.

9 .63

.95

Ca

(perc

ent)

2.4

2.3

2.3 1.8

1.8

2.2

1.8

2.2 1.7

2.2 2.2 1.7 .9

71

.61.5

1.6

2-3

2.1

2-0

2.2

2.1 1.7

2-2

1.9 1.7

1.9 1.3

1.1

1.3

1.4

1.1

1.2 .6

61

.5 .84

1.3 1.2 .9

91

.2 1.1

Mg

(perc

ent)

0.6

2.4

3.4

8.3

9.3

8

.40

.37

.55

.38

.51

.54

.35

.23

.35

.35

.34

.56

.55

.55

.63

.64

.48

.62

.43

.43

.31

.46

.43

.51

.47

.38

.39

.23

.46

.40

.50

.39

.51

.38

.38

Na

(perc

ent)

0.2

0.2

3.2

6.6

0.6

1

.42

.52

.14

.16

.033

.022

.69

.66

.74

.74

.75

.025

.023

.032

.021

.024

.030

.04

9.0

13

.21

.70

.035

.02

7.1

0.2

9

.29

.29

.18

.24

.26

.24

.14

.34

.26

.53

K (p

erc

en

t)

0.0

96

.04

7.0

52

.025

.029

.04

9.0

32

.026

.022

.10

.020

.092

.13

.034

.03

9

.042

.043

.040

.078

.024

.033

.35

.24

.02

8.0

52

.043

.11

.07

3.1

2.0

57

.10

.14

.23

.045

.50

.11

.05

2.6

8.0

76

.035

Fe

(perc

ent)

0.3

2.4

2.2

7.6

2.1

3

.69

1.1 .2

9.3

51.

5 .038

.51

.47

1.4 .2

8

.31

1.6 .5

5.6

5.1

8

.60

.23

.36

1.4 .5

1

1.3 .6

64

.4 .77

.43

2.9 .5

815

.30

1.3 .3

3.6

11.0

2.0 .2

7

Ti

(perc

en

t)

0.0

47

.03

1.0

32

.015

.023

.048

.027

.02

7.0

24

.042

.025

.057

.04

1.0

71

.062

.055

.060

.048

.051

.026

.049

.075

.09

4.0

24

.045

.092

.046

.02

1.0

47

.090

.082

- .0

34

.024

.046

.096

.09

2.0

25

.081

.055

.032

Ag-

S

(ppm

) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .5 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

As

(ppm

)

1.9

2.7

2.5 .7 .9

1.5

1.7

1.2

2.7

6.0 .9

6.3

15 4.8

l.O

L

3.1

4.2

6.4

110 1

.3

2.1

2.5

451

.91.3

5.6

1318

0 8.3

5.6

28 33 170 2

.619 3

.53.5

23 19 18

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

'

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D18

8138

D18

8140

D18

8141

D18

8142

D18

8143

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

Page 33: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le 5

. M

ajo

r-,

min

or-

, an

d tr

ace-e

lem

ent

com

po

sito

n

of

57 li

gnit

e

sam

ple

s fr

om

th

e

Fo

rt

Uni

on

Form

atio

n.

McC

one.

R

ichln

nd,

U)

ro

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8L37

D18

8138

D18

8140

D18

8141

D18

8142

D18

8143

U18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

DL

9664

7D

1966

48D

1966

49D

1966

50D

1966

51

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

B-S

(ppm

)

100

150

150

150

150

100 70 50 100 70 100

100 70 100 70 70 100 70 100 70 70 50 70 70 150

100

150

150

150

150

100

200 70 150

150

150

150

150

100

150

Daw

son,

Ba-

S(p

pm

)

100

300 30 70 50 300 70

500

200

200 20

1,0

00

700

1,0

00

1,0

00

1,5

00

1,0

00

300 70 150

700

200

300 70 200

1,0

00

500 30 150

3,0

00

3,0

00 70

500

300

200

500

100

300

700 50

and

Wib

aux

Be-

S(p

pm)

N N N N .5 N N N .3 .5 N 1 1.5 N 1.5 .7 .7 .3

1 N N N .7 N 1 1 2 3.5 .5 .5

1 5.3

2

.5 .53

.51

Co

un

ties,

M

on

t.,

and

Cd

(ppm

)

0.1

4L

09L

.10L

.28

.09L

.13L

.10L

.08L

.07L

.15L

.08L

.11L

.10L

.12L

.09L

.09L

.15L

.10L

.13L

.08L

10

L.1

7L.1

9L.1

0L.1

0L

.14L

13L

.18L

.13L

.14L

17L

.14L

.40L

.11L

.32L

.17L

.11L

.27L

.15L

.11L

Co

(ppm

)

0.6 .5

2.0 .4

1.0 .5 .9 .4

1.1

1.2 .5 1.1

2.1 .7

1.5 .8 .7

2.5

2.7 .4 .4

1.2

1.3

2.0 1.5

1.1

4.9

431

.3 .6

1.0

1.3

8.4 .9

7.7 1.0

1.0

6.7 1.7 1.2

Go

lden

V

alle

y

Cr

(ppm

)

3.2 1.9

4.2 1.3

2.0

3.1 1.7

1.0

2.2

3.4 1.2

3.5

5.1 2.0

3.0

2.4

2.5

2.7

4.5 1.5

1.8

12 7.9

1.4

3.2

3.0

14 9.1

6.0

3.6

4.3

7.3

15 2.4

22

6.3

3.3

20 4.3 .1

L

Co

unty

, N

Cu

(ppm

)

4.8

3-1

5.5

3.4

3.9

4.8

4.5

2.2

4.0

5.1 3.9

8.8 7.6

4.1

4.9

5.6

5.4

6.9

8.8

3.9

4.0

8.4

18 3.3

6.2

5.2

17 8.4

9.5

5.3

6.0

8.7

18 4.8

30

7.5

5.1

24 6.4

6.9

. D

ak. co

nti

nu

ed

F(p

pm)

40 25 30 25 40 45 30 30 30 45 45 45 55 30 45 60 20L

25 40 20L

25 150

100 30 20 25 45 25 50 30 25 45 50 25 180 45 30 190 25 25

Ga-

S(p

pm)

5 1.5

3 1.5

1.5

5 1.5 .7

1.5

2 1.5

3 7 2 3 5 2 3 2 1.5

1.5

5 7 1.5

3 5 10 15 2 5 3 5B

2 10 5 3 20 2 5

Ge-

S(p

pm)

N N N N N N N N N N N N 3 N N 2 N N N N N N N N N N 7 15N N N N N N N N N N N N

Sam

ple

num

ber

D18

8118

D18

8119

D18

8120

D18

8121

D18

8122

D18

8123

D18

8124

D18

8125

D18

8126

D18

8136

D18

8137

D18

8138

D18

8140

D18

8141

D18

8142

D18

8143

D18

8128

D18

8129

D18

8130

D18

8131

D18

8132

D18

8133

D18

8134

D18

8135

D18

8144

D18

8145

D19

6641

D19

6642

D19

6643

D19

6645

D19

6647

D19

6648

D19

6649

D19

6650

D19

6651

D19

6652

D19

6653

D19

6654

D19

6655

D19

6657

Page 34: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le 5

. M

ajo

r-,

min

or-

, an

d

trace-e

lem

ent

com

pogit

on

of

57 li

gnit

e

sam

ple

s fr

om

th

e

Fort

U

nio

n

Fo

rmati

on

, M

cCon

e,

Rlc

hla

nd

.

U>

U>

Daws

on,

and Wl

baux

Co

unti

es,

Mont

., and

Golden Valley

Samp

le

number

D1881

18D1

8811

9D1

8812

0D1

8812

1D1

8812

2

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

140

D188

141

D188

142

D188

143

D188

128

D188

129

D188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

D188

134

D188

135

D188

144

D188

145

D196

641

D196

642

D196

643

D196

645

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

D196

655

D196

657

Hg

(ppm

)

0.08 .16

.03

.05

.03

.08

.08

.02

.03

.10

.02

.05

.05

.03

.03

.03

.20

.08

.24

.03

.09

.06

.24

.07

.04

.10

.08

.79

.14

.09

.21

.11

.74

.08

.46

.10

.15

.18

.18

.13

La-S

(ppm) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 7 7 N 7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

LI

(ppm

)

12 1.5

3.8

2.6

3-4

17 2.0 8L

1.3

6.8

2.4

4.1

2.8

3.8

3-7

5.0

5.8

2.9

5.8

3-4

5-0

7.2

16 2.5

3.3

11 5.4

5.4

5.4

7.1

2.9

4.9

5.6

15

32 12

10

12 5-3 8.3

Mn

(ppm)

55 140 71 72 74 82 75 66 64 72 81 70 31 53 34 32

76

66 71 93 120 85 120 53

83 74

68

58

84

140 84

73

98

130 91 110

100 98 120

110

Mo-S

(ppm)

2 3 1.5

1.5

1.5

2 1.5

2 5 1.5

3 7 2 3 2 3 1.5

2 N 1.5 N 3 2 3 3 2 15

1.5

1.5

5 5 20 1.5

10

1.5

1.5

15 3 3

Nb-S

(ppm) N N 3 N N

5N N N 3 N 2 5 N 3 2 N 3 2 N 2 3 3 N 2 3 5 10N N N 3L N N 7 3 2L

5L N N

County, N.

Ni-S

(ppm)

1 1 2.7

1.5

1.7 .7

1 1

.71.

53 1 1.

5

1.5

1 2 5.7 .5

1 3 1.5

1.5

2 5 30 2 1.5

3 3 30

1.5

15 2 1.5

15 3 1.5

Dak. continued

P (p

pm)

600L

410L

4 SOL

400L

380L

570L

450L

340L

290L

640L

370L

490L

450L

540L

410L

400L

63

0L

450L

560L

370L

450L

730L

83 OL

440L

420L

610L

39

61L

350

130 45L

43L

35L

86

42L

89

87

47L

86 42L

Pb

(ppm

)

6.9

2.4

5.1

3.7

2.2

5.2

3.1

2.7

2.7

7.4

2.1

5.0

3.1

3.1

4.2

4.1

5.1

4.2

4.5

4.2

4.1

5.0

7.6

3.5

2.9

6.3

3-9

5.3

4.0

5.4

4.3L

3.5L

10

L 4.9

9.6

6.8

4.2

6.8L

3.8L

3.2

Sb

(ppm

)

0.3 .2 .4 .2 .3 .3 .2 .1 .3 .8 .1

1.1

2.5 .6 .6 .9

.5

1.0

1.0 .2 .2 .6

1.0 .1

.4 .6

2.1

11.0

.7

.3 .9

1.4

4.0

2^9 .4

.5

3.8

1.8 .8

Sample

nu mb e r

D188

118

D188

119

D188

120

D188

121

D188

122

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

140

D188

141

D188

142

D188

143

D188

128

D188

129

D188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

D188

134

D188

135

D188144

D188

145

D196

641

D196

642

D196

643

D196

645

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

D196

655

DI96

657

Page 35: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le 5.

Majo

r-,

min

or-

, an

d tr

ace-e

lem

en

t co

mpo

siti

on

of

57 li

gnit

e

sam

ple

s fr

om

th

e F

ort

U

nion

F

orm

atio

n,

McC

one,

R

ich

lan

d,

OJ -p-

Daws

on,

and

Wibaux Co

unti

es,

Mont.j and

Golden Va

lley

Co

unty

, N.

Sample

number

D188

118

D188

119

D188

120

D188

121

D188

122

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

1AO

D188

1A1

D188

142

D188

143

D188

128

D188

129

D188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

D188

134

D188

135

D188

144

D188

145

D196

641

D196

642

D196

643

D196

6A5

D196

647

D196

648

D196

649

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

654

D196

655

D196

657

Sc-S

(ppm

)

1.5 N 1.7

1.5

1 N N .51 N 1.

53 1 1.

5

2 N .72 N N 2 3 N 3 1.

55 5 1.

5L2 1.

53 7 1 10 1.

51.5

7 1.5

2

Se (ppm

)

0.9 .3 .4 .5 .4

1.2 .6 .3 .4 .8 .4 .6 .4 .6 .1L

.5 .5 .81.

1 .7 .7 .7 .9 .7 .6 .8 .81.7

1.0 .7 .4 .4 .8 .11.

.8 .8 .5 .1L

.1L

.7

Sr-S

(ppm)

500

500

500

700

700

500

700

500

300

200

200

300

200

700

500

700

200

300

200

200

300

200

300 70

200

500 70 150

200

300

300

200

200

200

200

300

200

300

300

150

Th (ppm)

2.7 .5

1.8 .9

1.1

2.5 .9 .4 .9

2.1 .7

1.3

1.7

1.5

1.7

1.8

2.4

1.7

2.5

1.0

1.2

3.1

3.7 .9

1.5

2.1

2.8

3.5

2.4

2.1

1.8

1.6 .1L

1.8

5.7

3.8

1.6

4.3

2.3

2.4

U(p

pm)

1.5

2.1

1.7

1.0

1.2

2.1

1.1 .2L

1.2

3.1 .8

2.9

6.5

1.4

1.2

1.9

2.5

1.7

1.8 .7 .9

1.6

2.2

13 1.8

1.6

13 171.5

1.5

2.2

2.9

5. A .9

7. A

1.5

1.2

161.8

1.4

V-S

(ppm)

5 3 7 3 7 5 3 2 5 5 2 15 307 7

15 5 7 10 2 3 10 15 3 7 550 307 10 10 20 303

50 10 730 5 7

Y-S

(ppm

)

7 2 5 3 7 5 2 1.5

5 5 1.5

7 15 3 7 7 7 7 101.5

2 5 7 3 7 7 15 15 3 7 5 10 10 320 5 5 205 7

Dak.

continued

Yb-S

(ppm)

0.5 .2 .3 .3 .7 .5 .3 .2 .3 .7 .2 .7 1.5 .3 .7 .7 .7 .5

1.1

5

.2 .51.3 .7 .7

2 3.5 .5 B 1 B .3

2

.5 .53B .5

Zn (ppm)

A. 7

3.3

8.0

4.4

2.5

3.1

3.1

2.6

2.6

8.7

2.8

11 12 5-6 A. 7

2.5

5.5

7.5

11 2.9

A.I

7.9

12 3.8

3.5

A. 9

150 57 AO8.

8

12 17 75 6.2

7A 15 17 65 16 26

Zr-S

(ppm

)

203 10 15 15 20 3 2 5 10

7 15 15 20 15 20 15 10 207 7 15 307 15 20 50 100 15 20 15 20 70 15 50 20 15 50 15 20

Sample

numb

er

D188

118

D188

119

D188

120

D188

121

D188

122

D188

123

D188

124

D188

125

D188

126

D188

136

D188

137

D188

138

D188

140

D188

1A1

D188

142

D188

1A3

D188

128

D188

129

D188

130

D188

131

D188

132

D188

133

D188

13A

D188

135

D188

1AA

D188

1A5

D196

6A1

D196

6A2

D196

643

D196

6A5

D196

6A7

D196

6A8

D196

6A9

D196

650

D196

651

D196

652

D196

653

D196

65A

D196

655

D196

657

Page 36: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tab

le 5

. M

ajo

r-,

min

or-

, an

d tr

ace-e

lem

ent

com

posi

tion

o

f 57

li

gn

ite

sam

ple

s fr

om

the

Fo

rt

Uni

on

Form

atio

n,

McC

one.

R

ich

lan

d,

Daws

on,

and

Wlbaux Co

unti

es,

Mont

., an

d Golden Valley Co

unty

, N. Dak. con

tinu

ed

Samp

le

number

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Si

(per

cent

)

4.7

1.5

1.5

1.7

3.4

1.2

7-4

1.3 .97

.47

2.2

1.1

3-6

1.6

2.5 .97

1.2

Al

(per

cent

)

1.1 .57

.75

.83

1.1 .46

1.1 .61

.66

.36

.76

.54

1.4 .78

1.0 .61

.70

Ca

(per

cent

)

1.2

1.6

1.0

1.1 .77

1.9

1.4

1.6

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.2 .73

1.2

1.6

1.6

1.6

Mg

(percent)

0.63 .53

.39

.37

.42

.52

.50

.51

.41

.35

.39

.40

.34

.40

.58

.49

.47

Na

(per

cent

)

0.031

.026

.12

.53

.081

.061

.041

.029

.11

.14

.49

.57

.50

.54

.11

.087

.068

K (p

erce

nt)

0.21 .089

.044

.076

.28

.044

.19

.070

.035

.052

.070

.035

.32

.056

.059

.043

.050

Fe

Tl

(percent)

(per

cent

)

1.6 .80

8.5

1.0 .32

.25

.79

.65

.55

.64

.28

.46

2.4 .28

.90

.55

.58

0.16 .040

.032

.039

.052

.038

.53

.043

.031

.48

.050

.038

.077

.047

.084

.031

.036

(ppm) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

As

(ppm

)

19 10 228.

48.

9

2.2

10 4.6

15 19 5.2

4.5

636.

37.

1

6.6

1.6

Samp

le

number

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6658

D19

6659

D19

6661

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D19

6628

D19

6629

D19

6630

D19

6631

D19

6632

D19

6634

D19

6635

D19

6637

D19

6638

D19

6640

B-S

(p

pm)

150

150 70 150

150

150

200

200

150

200

200

150

150

100

150

150

200

Ba-

S

(ppm

)

1,0

00

150

500 70 150

100

7,0

00

200

100

2.00

0G

100

200

150

300

150

200

300

Be-

S

(ppm

)

1.5 1 3 1.5

2

.55

.71

.52 3

.31.5 .3 .5 .3 .3

Cd

(ppm

)

0.2

3L

.13L

.26L

.13L

.14L

.11L

.29L

.12L

.42

.13L

.12L

.21

.21L

.11L

.18L

.101

,.1

2L

Co

(ppm

)

2.6 .9

2.3

1.5

1.6

1.1

2.0 .8

3.0

6.2

3-1 .5

28.7 .6 .6

3.5

Cr

(ppm

)

8.6

6.2

4.5

4.0

9.8

3.6

14 3.7

4.0

6.3

5.1

3.0

29 3-3

6.3 1.7

2.8

Cu

(ppm

)

137.

14

.27.5

10 5.6

10 4.4

219

.0

8.0

4.1

25 4.4

13 3.6

4.2

F (p

pm)

55 25 20L

30 90 20 40 20 20 20 25 25 110 35 20 20 25

Ga-

S

(ppm

)

7 3 5 5 10 2 15 3 5 15 7 2 15 3 5 1.5

2

Ge-

S

(ppm

)

N N 7 N 3L N 7L N 2L 10 7 N 7 N 3L N 2L

Sam

ple

num

ber

D19

6658

D19

6659

D19

6661

D19

6662

D19

6624

D19

6625

D19

6627

D19

6628

D19

6629

D19

6630

D19

6631

D19

6632

D19

6634

D19

6635

D19

6637

D19

6638

D19

6640

Page 37: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Tabl

e 5. Major-, mi

nor-

, and

trac

e-el

emen

t compositon of 57

li

gnit

e sa

mple

s from the

Fort

Union

Form

atio

n. Hc

Cone

, Richland.

Daws

on,

and

Wibaux Counties,

Mont., and

Golden Valley

Sample

numb

er

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Hg (ppm

)

0.12 .14

.56

.19

.06

.06

.18

.06

.23

.10

.06

.15

1.2 .11

.24

.15

.08

La-S

(ppm

) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

LI (ppm)

9-4

4-3

8.7

6.9

5.9

3.5

12 4.7

5.4

1.3L

6.8

4.3

6.8

5.9

12 4.7

5.7

Mn

(ppm

)

42 91 40 64 41 190 52 96 77 32 89 100 62 140

100

130

180

Mo-S

(ppm)

3 2 7 5 3 2 3 3 7 7 2 1.5

151 1.5

1.5

2

Nb-S

(ppm)

5 3 N 2L 3L 2L 7L 2L 2L 10 3 2 10 2L 3L N 2L

Coun

ty,

N.

Nl-S

(ppm

)

5 2 5 2 2 1 5 1 3 7 2 1501.5

1.5

1.5

2

Dak. con

tinu

ed

P(ppm)

40L

88 46L

45L

44L

260 38L

84 45 44L

42L

87 47 44L

46L

220

390

Pb (ppm)

5.7L

4.7

7.9

5.9

5.8

3.7

7.2

4.2

3.1

3.1

6.0

4.2

9-6

4.5

6.2

4.7

3.0L

Sb (ppm

)

3.6 .4

1.5

1.0

1.9 .4

2.0 .4

l.l

4.7

1.1 .4

7.3 .4 .8 .6 .3

Sample

number

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196638

D196

640

Samp

le

numb

er

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

1)19

6662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Sc-S

(p

pm)

3 2 5 2 7 1.5

10 2 2 3 3 1 7 1L 3 1L 1L

Se

(ppm)

1.3 .7 .9 .5 .6 .7

1.2 .6 .5 .6

1.0 .7

1.1 .7

1.6 .1L

.6

Sr-S

(ppm)

200

200

300

200

200

200

500

200

150

200

200

200

200

200

300

200

200

Th

(ppm)

3.7

2.7

2.5

2-1

2.5

2.4

5.3

2.0

1.6

l.l

3.6

1.8

5.7

2.3

4.4

1.4

1.8

U (p

pm)

5.2

2.1

1.8

1.8

11

.89.8

2.7

2.4

10 4.1 .9

13.8

4.3 .9

1.2

V-S

(ppm)

15 10 7 10 20

730 10 15 30 20 5 70 7 15 1.

53

Y-S

(ppm)

15 10 7 7 15 7303 7 15 20 3 203 10 3 3

Yb-S

(ppm

)

1.5

1 B .71.

5 .52.3 .7

2 2.3

3.3 .5 .2 .3

Zn

(ppm

)

39 5.4

130 5.

516 6.

0256.

583 34 31 1917

0 29 19 5.0

17

Zr-S

(ppm

)

50 20 50 20 30 15 100 20 15 70 70 15 70 15 30 10 20

Sample

number

D196

658

D196

659

D196

661

D196

662

D196

624

D196

625

D196

627

D196

628

D196

629

D196

630

D196

631

D196

632

D196

634

D196

635

D196

637

D196

638

D196

640

Page 38: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 6. Elements looked for but not detected inlignite samples from theMcCone, Rich land, Daws on,Mont., and Golden Valley

Fort Union Formation,and Wibaux Counties,

County, N. Dakota.

[Approximate lower detection limits for these elements in lignite ash, by the six-step spectrographic method of the U.S. Geological Survey are included]

Element Name Symbol

Gold Au

Bismuth Bi

Cerium Ce

Dysprosium Dy

Erbium Er

Europium Eu

Gadolinium Gd

Hafnium Hf

Holmium Ho

Indium In

Lutetium Lu

Neodymium Nd

Palladium Pd

Praseodymium Pr

Platinum Pt

Rhenium Re

Samarium Sm

Tin Sn

Tantalum Ta

Terbium Tb

Tellurium Te

Thallium Tl

Thulium Tm

Tungsten W

Lower limit ofdetection (ppm) in lignite ash

50

20

500

100

100

200

100

200

50

20

70

150

5

200

100

100

200

20

1,000

700

5,000

100

50

200

37

Page 39: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 7. Arithmetic mean, observed range, geometric mean, and geometric deviation of proximate and ultimate analyses, heat of combustion, forms of sulfur, and ash-fusion- temperature of 55 lignite samples from the Fort Union Formation, McCone, Richland, Dawson, and Wibaux Counties, Mont., and Golden Valley County, N. Dak.

[For comparison, geometric means for 32 other Fort Union region, North Dakota, and Montana lignite samples are included (Swanson and others, 1974, table 8). All values are in percent except Kcal/kg, Btu/lb, ash-fusion temperatures and geometric deviations and are reported on the as-received basis. L, less than the value shown. Leaders ( ) indicate no data. Kcal/kg = 0.556(Btu/lb). °F = (°C x 1.8) + 32]

Arithmetic Observed rangemean

GeometricMinimum Maximum mean

Geometric deviation

Fort Union region

geometric mean

Proximate and ultimate analyses

MoistureVolatilematter

Fixedcarbon

AshHydrogen CarbonNitrogen Oxygen Sulfur

37.5

25.0

27.99.56.7

36.8.6

44.7 1.2

26.2

13.3

20.53.65.2

28.6.4

29.7 .2

43.4

38.8

44.023.77.3

41.9.7

51.5 11.7

37.4

24.7

27.68.86.6

36.6.6

44.5 .8

1.1

1.2

1.21.51.1 1.11.2 1.12.4

34.9

27.4

30.16.46.7

40.7.6

43.9 .6

Heat of combustion

Kcal/kg Btu/lb

SulfatePyritic Organic

3,410 6,130

0.14.77 .50

2,690 4,840

0.01L.OIL .13

3,865 6,950

Forms of

.958.40 2.46

3,395 6,110

sulfur

0.04.27 .41

1.1 1.1

4.54.3 1.9

3,770 6,780

0.02.13.36

Ash-fusion temperatures, °C

Initialdeformation

Softening temperature

Fluidtemperature

1,180

1,215

1,260

1,040

1,060

1,080

1,410

1,460

1,590

1,180

1,210

1,260

1.1

1.1

1.1

38

Page 40: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 8. Arithmetic mean, observed range, geometric mean, and geometric deviation of ashcontent and contents of nine major and minor oxides in the laboratory ash of 57 lignitesamples from the Fort Union Formation, McCone, Richland, Dawson, and Wibaux Counties,Mont. , and Golden Valley County, N. Dak.

[For comparison, geometric means of analyses of 80 other Fort Union region, North Dakota and Montana lignite samples are included (Hatch and Swanson, 1977, table 5a) . All samples were ashed at 525°C; all analyses except geometric deviation are in percent]

Oxide

(Ash)

Si02

A1 2°3

CaO

MgO

Na20

K20

Fe 20 3

Ti0 2

so3

Arithmetic mean

14.0

26

10

19

6.1

3.4

.74

9.5

.73

12

ObservedMinimum

6.7

7.6

4.2

2.3

.95

.18

.20

.65

.10

3.5

rangeMaximum

40.2

56

17

40

12.4

11.1

3.0

53

6.4

32

Geometric mean

13.1

23

9.7

16

5.55

1.48

.63

7.0

.62

10

Geometric deviation

1.4

1.6

1.4

1.8

1.5

3.7

1.8

2.2

1.8

1.8

Fort Unionregion

geometric mean

9.0

13

8.6

22

7.01

1.43

.059

5.0

.49

19

39

Page 41: Chemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation ... · PDF fileChemical analyses of lignite from the Fort Union Formation, ... 17. 25. 14. 16. 15. 23. 14. 22. 14. 17

Table 9. Arithmetic mean, observed range, geometric mean, and geometric deviation of 35 elements in 57 lignite samples from the Fort Union Formation, McCone, Richland, Dawson, and Wibaux Counties, Mont., and Golden Valley County, N. Dak.

[For comparison, geometric means of analyses for 80 other Fort Union region North Dakota and Montana coal samples are included (Hatch and Swanson, 1977, table 5b). All analyses except geometric deviation are in percent or parts per million and are reported on a whole-coal basis. As, Co, Cr, F, Hg, Sb, Se, Th, and U values used to calculate the statistics were determined directly on whole coal. All other values were calculated from determinations made on coal ash. L, less than the value shown]

Element

SiAlCaMgNaKFeTi

AsBBaBeCoCrCuFGaHgLiMnMoNbNiPbSbScSeSrThUVYYbZnZr

Arithmeticmean

1.8.76

1.6.45.30.09

1.0.06

15150500

1.5

17.9

415.15

6.6853234.41.22.7

3002.33.4

157.7

2220

ObservedMinimum

0.27.20.66.23.013.020.038.01

0.75020 7

.3L

.03

.1L2.2

20L.7.02.8L

31.5L

2L.5

2.1.1.5.1L

70.1L.2L

1.51.5.15

2.52

rangeMaximum

8.22.92.4.64.75.68

15.53

Parts

180200

,000577

30190201.23

321902010509.6

11101.7

7005.7

1770303

170100

Geometricmean

1.4.67

1.5.44.14.07.64.05

per million

6.2100200

.7

.2

.56.7

353.10

5.27821.524.7

1.5.6

3001.92.3

107.7

1120

Geometricdeviation

2.01.71.41.33.42.32.71.9

3.81.53.52.83.43.11.81.82.12.52.01.52.32.32.71.62.92.91.61.71.82.42.42.12.23.22.3

Fort Unionregion

geometric mean

0.55.41

1.4.38.095.006.32.028

4100300

.21.51.53.8

261.5.09

2.429111.53.8.2

1.5.6

5002.4.6

33.2

2.310

40