23
China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

China Debate Education Network:

Analyzing a Debate Motion

Page 2: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Purpose of Analyzing Motion

Page 3: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Aspects of Analysis

• Background

• Type of motion

• Potential issues

Page 4: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Background

• Historical background of the motion

• Social context in which the motion is set

Page 5: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Type of Motion

• Descriptive or definitional• Relational– Relationship– Relationship of similarity

• Evaluative– Simple value motion– Policy motion

Page 6: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Definition and Interpretation

• Most motions can be defined and interpreted in different ways.

• The first speaker for the government has the right to define and interpret the motion and has the responsibility to do so in a reasonable fashion.

• The definition and interpretation should narrow and focus the motion to allow for a good debate for all.

Page 7: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Value and Policy MotionsValue Motions Policy Motions

Smoking in public is immoral. The city of Beijing should place greater restrictions on smoking in public.

China’s Hukou policy is too restrictive. The PRC should significantly revise its Hukou policy.

The rich-poor gap in the USA is too restrictive.

The USA should take actions to significantly reduce the income bap between the rich and poor.

The current generation in China has become too Westernized.

The Chinese education system should do more to teach the values of living in a communal society.

Page 8: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues for a Value Motion

• What criteria should be used?

• Does the object in question fulfill those criteria.

Page 9: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues in Value MotionsMotion Criteria Application

Smoking in public is immoral.

By what criteria should something be judged as “immoral?”

By those standards, is smoking in public immoral?

China’s Hukou policy is too restrictive.

According to what criteria is a policy be determined to be too restrictive?

By those criteria, is China’s Hukou policy too restrictive?

The rich-poor gap in the USA is too excessive.

What benchmarks determining that something is too restrictive?

According to these benchmarks, is the rich-poor gap too restrictive?

The current generation in china has become too Westernized.

By what criteria should something be considered too Westernized?

By those standards, is the current generation in China too Westernized?

Page 10: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues in a Policy Motion

• Ill

• Blame

• Cure

• Cost

Page 11: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues Regarding Ill

• What problems exist in the present system?• How significant are those problems?• Are the problems particularly harmful?• Do the problems affect a significant number of

people?

Page 12: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues Regarding Blame

• What is the cause of the problem?• Can the cause of the problem be located to a

particular feature of the present system?• Is a particular feature of the present system a

barrier to solving the problem?

Page 13: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues Regarding Cure

• What proposal can the Government Team envision that can overcome the barrier that exists in the present system?

• What actions, other than simply eliminating the barrier, does the Government Team need to include in their proposal?

• In other words, what positive consequences will the Government Team’s proposal achieve?

Page 14: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues Regarding Cost

• Will the Government’s proposal create more problems?

• Will those problems be more significant than those in the present system?

• Will the problems created affect more people than the problems created by the present system.

Page 15: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues About Smoking:Government Perspective

• Ill:– Smoking in public creates second-hand smoke.– Second-hand smoke involves nonsmokers who are

using public places like restaurants. – Second-hand smoke causes health issues for many

nonsmokers.

Page 16: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues About Smoking:Government Perspective

• Blame:– The present system currently allows smoking in

public places.– Even where smoking is not allowed, enforcement

is generally lax.– The problem of second-hand smoke cannot be

solved as long as the present system allows smoking in public places and as long as the present system does not enforce the law.

Page 17: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues About Smoking:Government Perspective

• Cure:– The Government Team proposes to outlaw

smoking in restaurants and other indoor places used by the public.

– The Government team also proposes to enforce this law by issuing fines to businesses and individuals.

– By outlawing smoking in public places and by enforcing those laws, the Government proposal will reduce the problem of second-hand smoke.

Page 18: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues About Smoking:Opposition Perspective

• Ill:– Public places to not contribute significantly to the

issue of second-hand smoke.– Evidence linking second-hand smoke to cancer

and other problems is not linked to smoking in public places.

Page 19: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues About Smoking:Opposition Perspective

• Blame– The present system is moving toward providing

non-smoking areas in public places.– Most second-hand smoke exists in homes, not in

public places.– When laws are not enforced, the blame lies not

with the present system, but with law enforcement officers.

Page 20: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues About Smoking:Opposition Perspective

• Cure:– If law enforcement officers do not enforce the

current laws, they will not enforce the new laws. – By outlawing smoking in public places, the

Government proposal will do little to reduce second-hand smoke, most of which exists in homes.

Page 21: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Potential Issues About Smoking:Opposition Perspective

• Cost:– By banning smoking in public places, the

Government proposal harms the rights of smokers.

– By banning smoking in restaurants, the Government proposal hurts restaurant owners.

– By banning smoking in public places, the Government proposal severely harms the economy.

Page 22: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Exercise 1

• In groups of two, phrase one value motion and one policy motion in each of the following areas: – Internet– Environmental protection– Education– Chinese economy

Page 23: China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion

Exercise 2

• Select one value motion and one policy motion from the previous list and analyze the background, type, definition and interpretation, and potential issues surrounding the motion.