Upload
lesley-clarke
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Chopping Simulations Results
M. Garcia Tudela, JB. Lallement, PA. Posocco, A. Lombardi, G.Bellodi, M. Eshraqi, E. Sargsyan, L. Hein
17/06/2010
2
Chopper Line - Introduction Placed between the RFQ and DTL.
Figure 1.- MEBT Scheme.
Aim: Modify the time structure of the pulse, avoiding losses at high energy.
Removes the bunches that would fall outside the bucket of the PSB at injection. (133/355) Removes the bunches during the rising time of the distributor (1µs gap) in the TL. Generate low intensity beams.
Allow the matching to the DTL. Beam Dynamics chopper ON, fate of the particles Simulations with
code PathManager[3] Field maps from the electromagnetic simulations [5] to have a realistic
approach.
17/06/2010
3
Chopper Line ON – 700V Nominal case. Losses in the MEBT.
Figure 2.- Beam power loss map [watts per element] in the MEBT.
Input beam: 106 macro particles 0.04 % Duty cycle PSB rep. rate 1Hz, 400 µs pulse. ~ 0.065 % Beam current after the MEBT. ( From 63.5 mA to 41µA)
17/06/2010
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.8
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Drift
c-0
Drift
c-1
Drift
c-2
L4L.QD
A03010
Drift
c-3
L4L.QFA
03030
Drift
c-4
L4L.BUN
03040
Drift
c-5
L4L.QD
A03050
Drift
c-6
L4L.QFA
03070
Drift
c-7
Drift
c-8
L4L.QFB03090
Drift
c-11
L4L.QD
C03110
Drift
c-14
Drift
c-15
Drift
c-16
L4L.BUN
03120
Drift
c-17
Drift
c-18
L4L.QFD
03130
Drift
c-19
Drift
c-20
DU
MP
Drift
c-21
Drift
c-22
L4L.QD
E03150
Drift
c-23
L4L.QFE03170
Drift
c-24
L4L.BUN
03190
Drift
c-25
L4L.QD
A03200
Drift
c-26
L4L.QD
A03220
Drift
c-27Po
wer
[W]
Chopper Line
4
Chopper Line ON – 700V Tracking the beam up to the PSB
Figure 3.- Beam power loss map [watts per meter] in the DTL.
No beam loss in the CCDTL or PIMS. Worst case in the transfer line is 0.25 W/m. 77% of the partially chopped beam (at the output of the dump) is
transmitted along the LINAC up to the end of the transfer line.
17/06/2010
0.00
00
0.00
04
0.00
08 0.00
20
0.00
25
0.00
00
0.00
00
0.00
00
0.00
00
0.00
19
0.00
02
0.00
00 0.00
12
0.00
06
0.00
00 0.00
08
0.00
27
0.00
00
0.00
00
0.00
05
0.00
86
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.01
0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5 15.5 16.5 17.5 18.5 19.5 20.5
Pow
er [
W/m
]
Lenght (m)
DTL
5
Figure 5.- TL beam energy. Chopper OFF.
Figure 4.- TL output beam (Nominal beam and deflected beam superimposed) .
Transmission, chopper ON: 0.06 %
Figure 6.- TL beam energy. Chopper ON.
Chopper Line ON – 700V
17/06/2010
Chopper OFF
Chopper ON
6
Chopper Line ON – Other approaches Chopping efficiency applying different voltages to the plates
for the same input beam.
Chopper OFF : Transmission after the MEBT 96.3% Transmission to PSB 89.4%
17/06/2010
Voltage [V]
Chopper efficiency % Input beam
stopped by the dump
Input beamto PSB
Extinction ratio
500 93.94 0.5 x 10-1
600 99.35 0.6 x 10-2
700 99.93 0.6 x 10-3
800 99.99 0.7 x 10-4
1E-05
1E-04
1E-03
1E-02
1E-01
1E+00
200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Exti
ncti
on R
atio
Chopper plates voltage [V]
7
Some numbers
17/06/2010
Beam pulse 0.4 ms Beam pulse per ring 0.1 ms
Repetition rate 1Hz
Bunch frequency 352.2 MHz
Number of bunches per pulse (0.4 ms): 3.5 x 104
Number of bunches per pulse per ring (0.1 ms) : 0.875 x 104
Number of particles per pulse to PSB: 1x1014
Number of particles per bunch 1.14 x10 9
Nf : Number of bunches filled in a pulse ( chopper OFF )
Ne: Number of bunches empty in a pulse( chopper ON )
Extinction ratio criterion:
Other commissioning scenarios: pulse 10 ns per ring ~ 3 bunches Fe < 0.34 x10 -3
700 v : Fe= 0.6 x 10-3 Number of particles chopper on is comparable to the number of particles during the pulse.
pulse 30 ns per ring ~ 10 bunches Fe < 0.87 x10 -3
Fe<Nf / Ne
100 µs
. . .
Nf Ne
. . .
Ring 3Ring 2Ring 1
8
If chopper driver rise/fall time > 2ns Partially deflected bunches
Partially deflected bunches
17/06/2010
Voltage [V]
Chopper efficiency
% Input beam stopped by the
dump
Input beamto PSB
Extinction ratio
200 30.6 6.9 x 10-1
300 55.4 4.4 x 10-1
400 78.3 2.1 x 10-1
200 V
300 V
400 V
5 * RMS Emittance, superimposed The level of the losses along
the linac is in the order of mW.
Figure 7.- TL output deflected beams for every voltage (X-Y).
9
Conclusions
The percentage of particles at the end of the TL decreases exponentially with the voltage.
The larger the pulse required in a ring , the less strict the extinguish factor required.
For the nominal case: 700 v 0.6 %o particles of the input beam transmitted to
the PSB. For some commissioning scenarios requiring very
low intensity beam this value could be not enough.
17/06/2010
10
References
17/06/2010
[1] F. Gerigk, M. Vretenar editors, “LINAC4 Technical Design Report”, CERN-AB-2006-084 ABP/RF
[2] N.V Mokhov and W.Chou editors, “Beam Halo and scraping”, Proc. 7th ICFA mini-workshop on high intensity and high brightness hadron beams, Interlaken resort, Wisconsin, United States, 1999
[3] A. Perrin and J.F Amand, Travel v4.07, users manual,CERN (2003).
[4] R.Duperrier, N. Pichoff, D. Uriot, “CEA Saclay codes review”, ICCS Conference 2002, Amsterdam
[5] T. Kroyer, F. Caspers, E. Mahner, “The CERN SPL Chopper Structure: A Status Report”, CERN-AB-2007-004, CARE-Report-06-033-HIPPI
[6] M. Garcia Tudela, JB. Lallement, A. Lombardi, “Chopper Line Studies”, CERN-sLHC-Project-Note-0012