Chris to Logy and History 2

  • Upload
    venlor

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Chris to Logy and History 2

    1/2

    Christology and history: A review essay

    Theology Today, Jul 2000 by Keck, Leander E

    Inevitably, to move beyond what historical criticism allows as "even permissible," Schwarz mustrely heavily on the Resurrection. But this too "is based on circumstantial evidence, on the

    appearances of the resurrected one and on the empty tomb"-that is, both historical data permit

    but do not require the inference that Jesus had been resurrected. Consequently, the Resurrectionis "only partially, and in a limited sense an event in history." Jewish thought did not expect the

    Resurrection of the messiah, but the disciples interpreted Jesus' Resurrection as "the beginning of

    God's new creation . . . the beginning of the new aeon." During Jesus' ministry, his authority"was proleptic" but "through his resurrection it gained final credibility, and the call for decision

    for or against him and his message could then be issued in his name."

    Related Results

    Christology: Key Readings in Christian Thought

    Matthew's Narrative Christology: Three Stories

    Anointed Son: A Trinitarian Spirit Christology, The

    The humanity of Christ; christology in Karl Barth's Church dogmatics

    Jesus of Galilee and the crucified people: the contextual Christology of Jon...

    The problem lies not in this understanding of the role of the Resurrection but in the use to which

    it is put-namely, a task assigned to history in christology overall cannot really be carried out,

    given the nature of the sources. On the one hand, beginning with the Jesus of history accordswith common sense, for, after all, the Jesus-event occurred before there was a Christian

    christology about him (leaving aside for the moment the question of his own "christology"). So itis understandable that one would want to develop a christology "from below" rather than "fromabove" (beginning with the Incarnation of the pre-existent one), especially since the latter

    conviction appeared later (a standard conclusion of historical criticism). Beginning with the

    Jesus of history might be feasible if we had reliable historical information about him that is

    independent of the Christian Gospels. The troublesome fact, however, is that everything that wecan learn about him depends on "the ever shifting results of New Testament exegesis."

    Moreover, developing a christology "from below" entails a shift away from the New Testament's

    christologies, for they begin "from the end"-from the end of the old age and the beginning of thenew.

    Accordingly, unless one allows the emergence and history of christology to govern its content, amore appropriate starting point would be the exegesis of the New Testament texts. The earliest

    Christians did, of course, have christologies before these texts were written, but they too can berecovered only from these texts by means of historical criticism.

    Powell's Jesus as a Figure in History shows how difficult it is to restate classical christology

    "from below," and that Schwarz's claim that "there is a body of information concerning the lifeand proclamation of Jesus on which most New Testament scholars virtually agree," is too

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3664/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3664/is_200007/http://findarticles.com/p/search/?qa=Keck,%20Leander%20Ehttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1683/is_201007/ai_n54716562/?tag=rel.res1http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1683/is_201010/ai_n56228770/?tag=rel.res2http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3818/is_201010/ai_n56442177/?tag=rel.res3http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0QLQ/is_2009_Feb/ai_n31558323/?tag=rel.res4http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6404/is_2_70/ai_n31942498/?tag=rel.res5http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6404/is_2_70/ai_n31942498/?tag=rel.res5http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3664/is_200007/http://findarticles.com/p/search/?qa=Keck,%20Leander%20Ehttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1683/is_201007/ai_n54716562/?tag=rel.res1http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1683/is_201010/ai_n56228770/?tag=rel.res2http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3818/is_201010/ai_n56442177/?tag=rel.res3http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0QLQ/is_2009_Feb/ai_n31558323/?tag=rel.res4http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6404/is_2_70/ai_n31942498/?tag=rel.res5http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3664/
  • 8/7/2019 Chris to Logy and History 2

    2/2

    sanguine. One can, of course, identify items that are not debated so long as they are phrased

    broadly; for example, Jesus was a Galilean who, having accepted John's baptism, undertook his

    own (itinerant) mission in which he spoke of the kingdom of God and associated with the poorbefore going to Jerusalem where he was crucified on Pilate's orders. But Powell's survey shows

    that controversy erupts as soon as one amplifies these items with historical details.