24
Christiane Querfeld, MD 2015... 2018 T-Cell Lymphomas: we are close to the finalization Bologna, IT May 9, 2018

Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Christiane Querfeld, MD

2015... 2018 T-Cell Lymphomas: we are close to the finalization

Bologna, IT May 9, 2018

Page 2: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

▪ Epigenetic alterations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of lymphomas and leukemias including CTCL

▪ miRNA profiling and RT-PCR discriminate CTCL and non-malignant inflammation with a high accuracy

▪ miR-155 is overexpressed in CTCL skin

▪ JAK/STAT, NFkB and PI3K pathways are activated in CTCL and regulated by miR-155 that lead to uncontrolled clonal cell expansion

Ralfkiaer et al. Blood 2011; Netchiporouk et al. Cell Cycle 2014; Van Kester et al. 2011; Maj et al. Br J Derm 2012;

Kopp et al. APMIS 2013; Kopp et al. Cell Cycle 2013; Moyal et al. Exp Derm 2013; Moyal et al. Br J Derm 2017

2

Page 3: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Archived tissue provided by

Madeleine Duvic (MD Anderson)

0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2

0

2 0 0

4 0 0

6 0 0

8 0 0

H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c t iv a tio n

C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c t iv ity

D a y s

% c

ha

ng

e c

om

pa

re

d t

o u

ntr

ea

ted

at

da

y 1

B e x a ro te n e

M 1 1 6 6 7

U n tre a te dUntreated

Bexarotene

miR-155 Inhibitor (MRG-106)3

n=10 n=13 n=21n=13

Page 4: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

PHASE 1 COBOMARSEN OPEN LABEL STUDY IN CTCLDESIGN AND INTERIM RESULTSSafety and efficacy

Page 5: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Objectives:▪ Primary: Investigate safety & tolerability of multiple injections

▪ Secondary: Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile

▪ Exploratory:

❑ Pharmacodynamic profile

❑ Gene expression alterations

❑ Histopathology of lesion biopsy

❑ Imaging of tumor morphology

Part AIntra-tumoral delivery of cobomarsen.

75 mg dose

Part BSystemic SC or IV delivery to determine optimal

potential dose. 300, 600 and 900 mg dose

Pretreatment

biopsy

Placebo MRG-106

Pretreatment

biopsy Placebo

biopsy

MRG-106

biopsyBiopsy

Cobomarsen

Sub-cut.

or IV

5

Page 6: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

6Database Jan 2018

• Balanced across stages

• Patient population failed

many prior therapies

• miR-155 elevated in most

enrolled patient’s lesions

Page 7: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Early termination

CAILS assessment day

MRG-106 injected lesions

= last injection day

7

Page 8: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

102-001 102-003 101-001 102-003 102-001 101-001 110-001

Saline MRG-106

Saline MRG-106

BLOQ BLOQ

MR

G-1

06

(mg/g

tis

su

e)

122 transcripts

Up-regulated vs. untreatedDown-regulated vs. untreated

8

MRG-106 Treatment

Decreases Key CTCL

Disease Pathways:

• STAT

• PI3K/AKT

• NFkB

Page 9: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

▪ Cobomarsen has been safe and generally well tolerated at all doses tested ▪ Multiple patients receiving more than a year of therapy (up to 39 grams

cumulative dose) with no serious adverse events attributed to cobomarsen

▪ No significant abnormalities found in liver or kidney function, no abnormalities in platelet counts

▪ No acute inflammatory toxicities

▪ No SAEs attributed to MRG-106

▪ Two Dose-Limiting Toxicities:

▪ Grade 3 worsening pruritus, possible tumor flare, occurred twice in one patient at 900 mg SC and 300 mg IV infusion

▪ Grade 3 tumor flare (300 mg IV bolus)

▪ Novel oligonucleotide drug class▪ Elimination of “gap” reduces chemical class based toxicity

▪ Short length minimizes heparin mimetic activity

No Serious

Adverse Events

attributed to

cobomarsen

No acute

inflammatory

toxicities

No significant

abnormalities

found in liver,

kidney or blood

9

Page 10: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

All Related AEs (grade 1-4): 133 (62.2% subjects)

Hematology

27 (34.1%)

Neutropenia

9 (20.5%)

Lymphopenia

6 (13.6%)

Anemia

1 (2.3%)

Thrombocytopenia

5 (9.1%)

Other

4 (9.1%)

Other Non-Hem

80 (50%)

GI

12 (15.9%)

Neurological

5 (9.1%)

Musculoskeletal

5 (4.5%)

Infection

1 (2.3%)

Skin

17 (20.5%)

Cardiac

3 (4.5%)

Renal

10 (11.4%)

Psychiatric

2 (2.3%)

Other/ Investigations

22 (29.5%)

Vascular

3 (4.5%)

Constitutional/Drug Administration

26 (27.3%)

Infusion reaction

16 (15.9%)

Injuries

1 (2.3%)

Constitutional

9 (15.9%)

10

Page 11: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

All Related AEs in > 10% of subjects (grade 1-4)

Hematology

27 (34.1%)

Neutropenia

9 (20.5%)

Lymphopenia

6 (13.6%)

Other Non-Hem

80 (50%)

GI

12 (15.9%)

Skin

17 (20.5%)

Renal

10 (11.4%)

Other/ Investigations

22 (29.5%)

Constitutional/Drug Administration

26 (27.3%)

Infusion reaction

16 (15.9%)

Constitutional

9 (15.9%)

11

Page 12: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Part B

SQ

Part B

(IV, 2 hr infusion)

Part B

(IV Bolus)

System Organ Class 900mg 300mg 600mg 900mg 300mg Total

Preferred Term n=45

Hematology 4 ( 8.9%)

Neutrophil count decreased 1 1 1 3 ( 6.7%)

White blood cell count decreased 1 1 2 ( 4.4%)

Lymphocyte count decreased 1 1 ( 2.2%)

Skin 2 ( 4.4%)

Pruritus 1 1 2 ( 4.4%)

Rash 1 1 ( 2.2%)

Metabolism and nutrition disorders 1 ( 2.2%)

Hyperuricaemia 1 1 ( 2.2%)

Neoplasms 2 ( 4.4%)

Tumour flare 1 1 2 ( 4.4%)

Vascular 1 ( 2.2%)

Hypertension 1 1 ( 2.2%)

12

Page 13: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

106-

002

101-

003

111-

001

106-

001

105-

002

102-

004

101-

002

105-

003

102-

005

108-

001

112-

003

108-

002

112-

006

101-

009

102-

008

102-

009

112-

001

102-

007

107-

003

112-

004

105-

004

106-

003

103-

001

111-

002

101-

005

104-

001

112-

005

102-

010

101-

004

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

25

Best

Ch

an

ge i

n m

SW

AT

Sc

ore

(%

)

300 mg

600 mg

900 mg

Subcutaneous IV BolusIV Infusion

* Treatment is ongoing

*

**

*

*

***

**

*

*

55 2629 43256 446 57 21 2586663 69# doses rec'd:

baseline mSWAT: 6 18103 43 20 58 178 595172 47 43 180278222 6 132

910

71

21

66

8

462

6 6

54

10

85

6

6

7

11

5

86

3

18

Note: Database January 2018 IV infusions showed the most consistent

response 13

Page 14: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420

Study Day

112-006

112-003

101-009

102-009

107-003

102-008

112-001

102-007

Su

bje

ct

ID

Ongoing

Last Dose

Drug Holiday

PD = Progressive Disease

PR = Partial Response

SD = Stable Disease

Bexarotene (24 mo)

Methotrexate (20 mo)

Interferon alfa (31 mo)

none

none

none

Oxsoralen

(19 mo)

none

112-

003

112-

006

101-

009

102-

008

102-

009

112-

001

102-

007

107-

003

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

Ch

an

ge i

n m

SW

AT

Sco

re (

%)

300 mg

600 mg

**

* Treatment is ongoing

**

*

2643

180 6

25

27

2944

43 82

8

178

7

11

6

58

# doses rec'd:

Baseline mSWAT:

300mg Dose Selected for Phase 2 in MFResponse and durability observed

independent of concomitant medication

Conmed (months

before Day1)

14

Page 15: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Concomitant med N Median time (min, max)

on therapy prior to study day 1

bexarotene 7 16 months (2, 26)

interferon-alfa 2 26 months (17, 34)

methotrexate 1 22 months

vorinostat 1 4 months

other 2 21 months (3, 45)

Database Jan. 25, 2018

15

Page 16: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Day 1

CAILS: 13

Day 19

CAILS: 10

Day 27

CAILS: 8

Day 57

CAILS: 5

Day 103

CAILS: 10

Day 131

CAILS: 8

Day 159

CAILS: 7

Day 186

CAILS: 6

Note: Grey shading = drug administration period, White

Shading = pause in drug administration

▪ There is continued improvement that extended beyond

discontinuation of the first 4 weeks of dosing that

eventually dissipated during the drug holiday

▪ Patient responded with re-initiation of therapy

5 4 5 8 5 1 2 5 1 6 5 2 0 5 2 4 5 2 8 5

0

2

4

6

8

1 0

1 2

1 4

1 6

1 8

2 0

2 2

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

1 0 2 -0 0 5

S tu d y D a y

mS

WA

T S

co

re

mS

WA

T (%

of B

as

elin

e)

16

Page 17: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

▪ Age: 51; Sex: Male

▪ Date of diagnosis: 2013

▪ CTCL stage at screening: IB

▪ Baseline mSWAT: 180

▪ Concomitant systemic therapy: Methotrexate (started June 2015)

▪ Has skin (mSWAT) PR lasting > 4 months

17

Day 1

mSWAT: 180

Day 93

mSWAT: 68

(62% reduction)

Database Dec. 4, 2017

Page 18: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

▪ 13 of 18 subjects show a significant improvement over the first 100 days on study drug

▪ Improvement and stabilization seem durable, in 4 subjects for up to one year and one subject is stable after 400+days on study drug

▪ Subject 112-001 (300 mg IV infusion) worsen Skindex 29 and mSWAT response after switched to monthly dosing on day 285.

Subject switched to

monthly dosing on day 285

18

Page 19: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

C5Day1 C6Day1

C8Day1 C9Day1

C7Day1

C10Day1

Day 1 Day 27 C1Day1

C3Day1 C4Day1C2Day1

Mean Skindex 29 Total Score

mS

WA

T S

co

re

19

Page 20: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

▪ Durable partial responses have been achieved at all dose levels

▪ 300-900 mg appear to represent the top of the dose response curve

▪ 300 and 600 mg IV-infusions had similar efficacy and tolerability, offering the most consistent response rate based on skin mSWAT scores

▪ 6 of 8 (75%) patients (initially assigned to 300 or 600 mg dose level) achieved skin PR

20

Page 21: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

▪ Cobomarsen is generally well-tolerated to date

▪ No SAEs deemed related to study drug

▪ Two Dose-Limiting Toxicities:▪ Grade 3 worsening pruritus, possible tumor flare, occurred twice in one patient

(900 mg SC cohort, 300 mg IV-infusion)

▪ Grade 3 tumor flare in 300 mg iv bolus patient

▪ 6 of 8 (75%) patients treated for > 1 month with 300 or 600 mg systemically had ≥ 50% mSWAT score reduction

▪ Best improvement in mSWAT score appeared to be seen after 1 or more months of dosing

▪ Cobomarsen treatment resulted in durable improved quality of life, as measured by the Skindex 29 Total Score

▪ This improvement parallels improvements in disease, as measured by the mSWAT score, in most subjects, even if the patients achieve less than a defined PR

▪ Study in CTCL is on-going (enrollment closed)

▪ Study has expanded to include patients with CLL, DLBCL, and ATLL, diseases in which miR-155 expression is increased

21

Page 22: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Primary endpoint:

▪ Overall Response Rate of four months (ORR4) using

Global Response

Key Secondary endpoints:

▪ Progression-free survival

▪ Patient reported outcomes

▪ Pain, itching

A RANDOMIZED, PARALLEL, OPEN LABEL, ACTIVE CONTROL, GLOBAL TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE IB-III MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES

Key inclusion criteria

▪ Stage Ib-III

▪ Must have received at least one prior therapy for CTCL (per NCCN guidelines for generalized skin involvement)

▪ mSWAT score ≥ 10

▪ No concurrent systemic therapy

Stratification factors

▪ Stage (Ib-IIa vs IIb-III)

▪ Prior Therapies (1-2 vs. 3 or more)

Open Label; Randomize to:

cobomarsen IV Infusionvs.

Vorinostat

Randomize

Cobomarsen (300mg IV Infusion)

n=~65 subjects

Vorinostatn=~65 subjects

Follow until progressionor death

Follow until progression or death

Open label extension

22

Page 23: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

23

Page 24: Christiane Querfeld, MD · 5/9/2018  · H u T 1 0 2 a p o to s is p a th w a y a c tiv a tio n C a s p a s e 3 /7 a c tiv ity D a y s % c h a n g e c o m p a r e d t o u n t r e

Jennifer DeSimone (Inova)

Herbert Eradat (UCLA)

Francine Foss (Yale)

Joan Guitart (Northwestern)

Ahmad Halwani (Huntsman)

Auris Huen (MD Anderson)

Youn Kim (Stanford)

Theresa Pacheco (University of Colorado)

Lauren Pinter-Brown (UC Irvine)

Pierluigi Porcu (Thomas Jefferson)

Christiane Querfeld (City of Hope)

Basem William (The Ohio State University)

INVESTIGATORS

24