cidb Quarterly Monitor; Transformation; 2019 Q4 · 2 2. Transformation of the Construction Industry 2.1 Background and Context This cidb Construction Monitor – Transformation draws

CONSTRUCTIONMONITOR

Transformation Q4 • 2019

CIDB CONSTRUCTION MONITOR – TRANSFORMATION; JANUARY 2020


1. Introduction ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 2. Transformation of the Construction Industry _______________________________________________ 2

2.1 Background and Context ___________________________________________________________ 2 2.2 A Strategy for the Transformation of the Construction Industry ____________________ 2 2.3 A Transformed Construction Industry ______________________________________________ 3

3. Transformation of the Built Environment Professions Sector _______________________________ 4 3.1 Black-Ownership ___________________________________________________________________ 4

4. Transformation of the Contracting Sector __________________________________________________ 5 4.1 Black-Ownership ___________________________________________________________________ 5 4.2 Woman-Ownership _________________________________________________________________ 6 4.3 B-BBEE Recognition Level __________________________________________________________ 8

4.4 Contracts Awarded _________________________________________________________________________ 9 Appendix 1: Provincial Data: Number of cidb Registered Contractors ____________________________ 10 Appendix 3: Provincial Data: Women-Ownership ________________________________________________ 12 Appendix 4: Provincial Data: B-BBEE Level _______________________________________________________ 13

1


1. Introduction

The cidb produces four cidb Quarterly Monitors annually, which focus on the following individual themes

each quarter:

• Quarter 1: Supply & Demand;

• Quarter 2: Contractor Development;

• Quarter 3: Employment; and

• Quarter 4: Empowerment.

This cidb Construction Monitor - Transformation covers empowerment issues in the construction industry,

focusing on Quarter 1 of 2019 to Quarter 4 of 2019. The Monitor presents an assessment of the state of

transformation of the construction industry, with a focus on the consulting engineering (or professional

service providers) and contracting sectors. The Monitor draws largely on information obtained from the cidb

Register of Contractors, the cidb Register of Projects and the Consulting Engineers South Africa (CESA) Bi-

Annual Economic and Capacity Survey.

2

2. Transformation of the Construction Industry

2.1 Background and Context

This cidb Construction Monitor – Transformation draws primarily on information obtained from the cidb

Register of Contractors, the cidb Register of Projects and the CESA Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey

and membership database. This assessment of the state of transformation of the consulting engineering

and contracting sectors is given in Sections 3 and 4 respectively.

Notwithstanding this, the following references dated 2012 to 2014 provide additional background and

context to transformation in the construction industry:

i) The Construction Industry Transformation Summit held on 23 November 2012, which was initiated by

the Minister of Public Works and hosted by the cidb.

ii) A workshop on the Effectiveness of the Construction Sector Charter held on 10 March 2014, co-hosted

by the cidb and the Construction Sector Charter Council (CSCC).

iii) The CSCC Baseline Report: State of Empowerment in the Construction Sector since the Gazette of the

Construction Empowerment Code in 2009 – 2013 which was released by the CSCC in April 2014.

The above references deal primarily with the state of transformation of enterprises, whereas reference to the

state of transformation of the built environment professionals can be found in:

iv) The Council for the Built Environment (CBE) Baseline study on Transformation in the Built Environment,

published in October 2016.

2.2 A Strategy for the Transformation of the Construction Industry

Drawing largely on the outcome of the Construction Industry Transformation Summit as well as the dti

transformation strategy, the cidb has developed the following conceptual framework for transformation of

the construction industry:

i) Macro-economic / business conditions impact on the total work available to the construction sector

and the underlying business conditions within which transformation must take place. An effective

transformation strategy must therefore aim to increase the total government spend and the efficiency

and rate of spend.

ii) Access to work / participation: Within the construction economy, enhancing transformation is

dependent on black-contractors, black-BEPs and black-materials manufacturers and suppliers

accessing work and the participation of the black-sector. An effective transformation strategy must

therefore increase the participation of the black-sector in public and private sector spend through

regulation, development programmes and best practice.

iii) Business factors: Notwithstanding that access to work is fundamental to enhancing transformation,

enhancing transformation requires support to enhance the capabilities of black-enterprise, availability

of skills, access to finance, etc. An effective transformation strategy must therefore enhance the

development and sustainability of the black-sector, and enhancing quality in the delivery of

construction works.

3

iv) Good governance: Transformation must be associated with the highest standards of corporate

governance of all participants. An effective transformation strategy must therefore encourage

transparency and good governance in the delivery of construction works.

v) Commitment: Addressing transformation is not the responsibility of one entity or organization, and

requires the commitment from the established construction industry to transform from within, and to

support the transformation of the black construction sector. Amongst others, public sector clients

have a key role to play in supporting the transformation of the construction sector through

developmental support and procurement interventions.

2.3 A Transformed Construction Industry

Targets for the transformation of the construction industry are, in effect, established and agreed to in the

Construction Sector Codes (CSCs). Notwithstanding this, as a high level target, the cidb is using the following

as a message for the cidb’s vision of transformation:

90% or more of the capacity of the construction industry is 90% or more black-owned,

and delivers 90% or more of construction contracts by value

4

3. Transformation of the Built Environment Professions Sector

Information on the state of transformation of the built environment professions (BEPs) sector is drawn largely

from the Consulting Engineers South Africa (CESA) Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey taken from

January to June 2018, together with other data available from CESA as at January 2019. In this regard it

should be noted that while CESA represents a large proportion of consulting engineers, it does not represent

all consulting engineers in South Africa

3.1 Black-Ownership

An assessment of data obtained from CESA membership data (as of end-January 2020) shows the percentage

of companies with black-ownership exceeding 50% as at January 2020. In comparison with the January 2019,

black-owned Qualifying Small Enterprises (QSEs) has increased from around 30% to 36% and Exempted

Micro Enterprises (EMEs) has increased slightly from 50% to 51%. The percentage of black-owned Large

enterprises has decreased from 20% to 13%.

Source: CESA Membership Database, www.cesa.co.za, January 2020

Size %

13%

36%

51%

100%

QSE

EME

Total

Black-Ownership; January 2020

Large

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Large

QSE

EME

5

4. Transformation of the Contracting Sector

Information on the state of transformation of the contracting sector is drawn largely from the cidb Register

of Contractors and the cidb Register of Projects.

4.1 Black-Ownership

Details of black ownership of cidb registered contractor enterprises (i.e not registrations) is given below for

South Africa for the following two ownership cases:

i) ownership control 51% or more; and

ii) ownership control 90% or more

The grade listed in the table below corresponds to the highest grade for an enterprise across all registrations

for the enterprise.

From the assessment below, it is seen that the state of transformation decreases with increasing cidb Grade

(size of company). Specifically, for ownership of 51% and above, less than 40% of cidb registered enterprises

in Grade 9 are black owned. (Note that the Grade 9 contractor enterprises in particular include public listed

companies and wholly owned subsidiaries, for which black-ownership other than directors is excluded. The

impact of excluding public listed and international companies on the profile is however small.)

From the table above, it is also seen that there is little difference between black-ownership of 51% and above

and 90% and above.

The history profiles of black ownership of 51% and above for contracting enterprises for the period 2017Q1

to 2019Q4 is shown in the following figures. Of concern is that while black ownership representation shows

improvement over time, overall, black ownership representation has not increased significantly over the past

three years in the higher level grades.

Grade Number Black (%)

9 67 35%

7 & 8 1 219 73%

5 & 6 2 767 88%

2 to 4 8 985 95%

Total 13 038 90%

9 56 29%

7 & 8 1 128 68%

5 & 6 2 634 84%

2 to 4 8 861 94%

Total 12 679 88%

Black-Ownership

Black-Ownership; 51%+


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

9

7 & 8

5 & 6

2 to 4

51%

90%

6

Black ownership by cidb Grade and by Class of Works for black-ownership levels of 51% and more is given

below. It is seen that black-ownership by Class of Works tends to be higher for General Building (GB),

followed by Civil Engineering (CE).

As context, information on the number of cidb registered contractors by province for General Building and

Civil Engineering is given in Appendix 1. Further information by province for General Building and Civil

Engineering is given in Appendix 2.

4.2 Woman-Ownership

Details of woman-ownership of cidb registered contractor enterprises (i.e not registrations) is given below

for South Africa for the following two ownership cases:

i) ownership control 30% or more; and

ii) ownership control 51% or more

The grade listed in the table below corresponds to the highest grade for an enterprise across all the

registrations for the enterprise.

From the assessment below, it is seen that the state of transformation decreases with increasing cidb Grade

(size of company) – but change with Grade is not pronounced as is observed for black-ownership.

Specifically, for ownership of 51% and above, it is seen that woman-ownership amounts to around 30% of

all contracting enterprises.


50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2016

01

2017

01

2018

01

2 to 4 5 & 6

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2016

01

2017

01

2018

01

7 & 8 9

Grade GB CE EB EP ME SW9 55% 37% 17% 31% 32% 9%

7 & 8 80% 77% 58% 71% 61% 28%5 & 6 92% 90% 80% 82% 76% 44%2 to 4 96% 96% 91% 90% 89% 60%


7

The history profiles of woman ownership of 51% and above for contracting enterprises for the period 2017Q1

to 2019Q4 is shown in the following figures. It is seen that woman-ownership in Grades 2 to 6 is in fact

decreasing overtime, whereas woman-ownership in Grades 7 to 9 is increasing. This is due in part to woman-

owned contractors upgrading to higher grades.

Woman-ownership by cidb Grade and by Class of Works for woman-ownership levels of 51% and more is

given below. Further information by province for General Building and Civil Engineering is given in Appendix

3. No significant trends in woman-ownership by Class of Works can be seen.

Grade Number Black (%)

9 47 24%

7 & 8 541 32%

5 & 6 1 083 34%

2 to 4 3 678 39%

Total 5 349 37%

9 36 19%

7 & 8 411 25%

5 & 6 872 28%

2 to 4 2 986 32%

Total 4 305 30%

Woman-Ownership

Woman-Ownership; 31%+


0% 20% 40% 60%

9

7 & 8

5 & 6

2 to 4

31%

51%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2016

01

2017

01

2018

01

2 to 4 5 & 6

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%20

1601

2017

01

2018

01

7 & 8 9

Grade GB CE EB EP ME SW9 31% 22% 0% 22% 20% 8%

7 & 8 26% 24% 23% 28% 25% 11%5 & 6 32% 28% 29% 28% 23% 14%2 to 4 32% 33% 29% 31% 26% 21%


8

4.3 B-BBEE Recognition Level

For the period under review (2018Q4), the percentage of registered contractors with a minimum B-BBEE

Level is given below for contractors that have submitted B-BBEE Level information.

It is seen that 42% of Grade 9 enterprises and 50% of Grade 7 and 8 enterprises have a minimum B-BBEE

Level of 2 (i.e a B-BBEE level 2 or 1). This shows some improvement compared to Q4 2018 of 36% of Grade

9 enterprises and 48% of Grade 5 and 6 enterprises with a minimum B-BBEE Level of 2.

Furthermore, it is seen around 90% of Grade 7 to 9 contracting enterprises have a minimum B-BBEE Level

contributor of 4 , which is regarded as being fully compliant with the Sector Codes.

An assessment of the percentage of contractors with a minimum b-BBEE Level by Class of Works is given

below.

Note that the Preferential Procurement Regulations (2017) allows for pre-qualification criteria for the

procurement of infrastructure, namely:

4. (1) if an organ of state decides to apply pre-qualifying criteria to advance certain designated groups,

that organ of state must advertise the tender with a specific condition that only one or more of the

following tenderers may respond:

(a) a tenderer having stipulated minimum B-BBEE status level of contributor

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 8% 42% 77% 88% 92% 94%

7 & 8 26% 50% 81% 91% 94% 97%

5 & 6 34% 48% 89% 97% 99% 99%

2 to 4 44% 46% 94% 100% 100% 100%

Minimum B-BBEE Level

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 6% 42% 74% 87% 90% 90% 9 13% 45% 75% 89% 93% 96%

7 & 8 28% 50% 83% 93% 95% 98% 7 & 8 26% 50% 83% 92% 95% 97%

5 & 6 37% 46% 91% 99% 100% 100% 5 & 6 32% 45% 89% 98% 99% 100%

2 to 4 43% 44% 96% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 47% 49% 95% 100% 100% 100%

EP EB

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 8% 38% 69% 92% 92% 92% 9 0% 33% 100% 100% 100% 100%

7 & 8 25% 48% 79% 93% 95% 97% 7 & 8 24% 50% 67% 83% 86% 90%

5 & 6 31% 51% 87% 94% 97% 98% 5 & 6 35% 56% 83% 92% 95% 95%

2 to 4 45% 49% 90% 99% 100% 100% 2 to 4 38% 44% 90% 99% 100% 100%

ME SW

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 5% 35% 85% 85% 90% 90% 9 0% 41% 82% 88% 94% 100%

7 & 8 23% 54% 74% 85% 92% 93% 7 & 8 27% 50% 75% 90% 93% 94%

5 & 6 30% 49% 80% 93% 98% 99% 5 & 6 35% 56% 91% 97% 98% 99%

2 to 4 37% 42% 86% 99% 100% 100% 2 to 4 42% 46% 92% 99% 100% 100%

Key: 20% 80% 100%

Date: 2018 Quarter 4

Minimum B-BBEE LevelMinimum B-BBEE Level

Percentage Contractors by Minimum BEE Level and Class of Works

Minimum B-BBEE Level Minimum B-BBEE Level


9

The above information can be used to guide the setting of B-BBEE Level eligibility levels.

Note that the cidb endorses all actions to enhance transformation in the construction industry, and endorses

the use of B-BBEE as an eligibility criteria for infrastructure procurement. However, it should be noted that

using excessively restrictive B-BBEE Levels as eligibility criteria could excessively restrict the market, which

can result in price increases and also in non-responsive tenders and procurement delays.

For further information by province for General Building and Civil Engineering is given in Appendix 4.

4.4 Contracts Awarded

Estimates of the value of public sector contracts awarded to black-and woman-owned contractor enterprises

during the three year period 2017Q1 to 2019Q4 are shown below.

Overall, it is seen that black-owned contractors (51% and more) are accessing in total around 51% of public

sector awards – which is significantly lower than the cidb’s vision of 90% of contract awards. Of particular

concern is that the percentages of work accessed in Grade 9 (i.e the higher value contract awards) is low.

Similar conclusions can be drawn for women-owned contractors, who access around 20% of total public

contract awards. It is noted however that the total number of women-owned enterprises (51% or more

woman-ownership) is around 31% of total registered enterprises.

Grade Black (%) Woman (%)

9 26% 16%

7 & 8 80% 24%

5 & 6 90% 30%

2 to 4 94% 30%

Total 51% 20%

Public Sector Contracts Awarded

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

9

7 & 8

5 & 6

2 to 4

Black

Woman

10

Appendix 1: Provincial Data: Number of cidb Registered Contractors

Grade GB CE Grade GB CE

9 2 2 9 1 2

7 & 8 62 63 7 & 8 62 85

5 & 6 123 198 5 & 6 179 189

2 to 4 447 552 2 to 4 308 338

9 4 9 1 1

7 & 8 38 42 7 & 8 42 54

5 & 6 72 97 5 & 6 109 71

2 to 4 205 200 2 to 4 343 184

9 47 63 9

7 & 8 285 347 7 & 8 14 13

5 & 6 461 459 5 & 6 25 35

2 to 4 1256 712 2 to 4 139 115

9 4 13 9 7 12

7 & 8 118 172 7 & 8 50 45

5 & 6 240 359 5 & 6 90 76

2 to 4 1233 1888 2 to 4 286 189

9 4 4 9 67 102

7 & 8 85 116 7 & 8 756 937

5 & 6 220 247 5 & 6 1519 1731

2 to 4 376 377 2 to 4 4593 4556

KwaZulu-Natal

Limpopo

North West

Northern Cape

Western Cape

South Africa

Number of Contractors

Eastern Cape Mpumalanga

Free State

Gauteng

11

Appendix 2: Provincial Data: Black-Ownership

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 0% 0% 50% 50% 100% 9 0% 0% 33% 67% 100%

7 & 8 70% 74% 77% 79% 100% 7 & 8 53% 57% 66% 71% 100%

5 & 6 83% 85% 91% 93% 100% 5 & 6 85% 87% 90% 91% 100%

2 to 4 94% 94% 95% 95% 100% 2 to 4 94% 94% 96% 96% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 9 40% 40% 40% 40% 100%

7 & 8 65% 65% 77% 81% 100% 7 & 8 63% 66% 77% 83% 100%

5 & 6 78% 81% 83% 85% 100% 5 & 6 82% 85% 85% 87% 100%

2 to 4 97% 97% 97% 97% 100% 2 to 4 95% 96% 98% 98% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 49% 51% 56% 64% 100% 9 36% 38% 44% 51% 100%

7 & 8 78% 80% 82% 85% 100% 7 & 8 69% 72% 73% 78% 100%

5 & 6 88% 89% 91% 92% 100% 5 & 6 86% 87% 89% 91% 100%

2 to 4 95% 95% 95% 96% 100% 2 to 4 92% 92% 94% 95% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 33% 33% 33% 50% 100%

7 & 8 66% 71% 75% 82% 100% 7 & 8 70% 72% 78% 81% 100%

5 & 6 87% 88% 89% 91% 100% 5 & 6 85% 85% 87% 91% 100%

2 to 4 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 2 to 4 98% 98% 98% 98% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 67% 67% 100% 100% 100% 9 25% 25% 50% 75% 100%

7 & 8 88% 90% 94% 96% 100% 7 & 8 87% 89% 91% 95% 100%

5 & 6 97% 97% 98% 98% 100% 5 & 6 93% 93% 95% 95% 100%

2 to 4 96% 96% 97% 97% 100% 2 to 4 96% 96% 97% 97% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

7 & 8 89% 89% 91% 91% 100% 7 & 8 90% 90% 96% 96% 100%

5 & 6 97% 98% 98% 98% 100% 5 & 6 92% 93% 96% 96% 100%

2 to 4 97% 98% 98% 99% 100% 2 to 4 97% 97% 98% 98% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 9

7 & 8 73% 73% 83% 90% 100% 7 & 8 53% 53% 63% 73% 100%

5 & 6 91% 92% 92% 93% 100% 5 & 6 88% 88% 89% 93% 100%

2 to 4 95% 95% 96% 96% 100% 2 to 4 93% 93% 96% 96% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 9

7 & 8 42% 42% 42% 50% 100% 7 & 8 47% 47% 60% 60% 100%

5 & 6 95% 95% 95% 95% 100% 5 & 6 78% 78% 78% 78% 100%

2 to 4 95% 95% 95% 95% 100% 2 to 4 90% 91% 94% 94% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 22% 22% 22% 33% 100% 9 11% 11% 11% 11% 100%

7 & 8 48% 50% 50% 58% 100% 7 & 8 27% 33% 35% 44% 100%

5 & 6 69% 69% 70% 75% 100% 5 & 6 40% 41% 50% 57% 100%

2 to 4 83% 84% 85% 87% 100% 2 to 4 73% 75% 78% 80% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 48% 49% 55% 61% 100% 9 32% 33% 40% 48% 100%

7 & 8 76% 78% 80% 82% 100% 7 & 8 68% 71% 75% 79% 100%

5 & 6 90% 91% 92% 93% 100% 5 & 6 85% 86% 88% 90% 100%

2 to 4 96% 96% 96% 97% 100% 2 to 4 95% 95% 96% 96% 100%

Key: 50% 90% 100%

Date: 2018 quarter 4

Kwa-Zulu NatalKwa-Zulu Natal

Limpopo Limpopo

MpumalangaMpumalanga

General Building (GB) Civil Engineering (CE)

Free State Free State

Gauteng Gauteng

Minimum Black-Ownership (%)

Eastern Cape Eastern Cape

Minimum Black-Ownership (%)

Minimum Black-Ownership (%) Minimum Black-Ownership (%)


Western Cape

Northern Cape

North WestNorth West

Northern Cape

Western Cape



South Africa South Africa


Minimum Black-Ownership (%)Minimum Black-Ownership (%)




12

Appendix 3: Provincial Data: Women-Ownership

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 9 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

7 & 8 11% 13% 19% 29% 100% 7 & 8 16% 21% 24% 35% 100%

5 & 6 21% 24% 30% 34% 100% 5 & 6 16% 18% 21% 30% 100%

2 to 4 24% 25% 28% 38% 100% 2 to 4 26% 27% 30% 39% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 11% 13% 13% 24% 100% 9 50% 50% 50% 50% 100%

7 & 8 15% 21% 21% 26% 100% 7 & 8 5% 7% 19% 21% 100%

5 & 6 23% 28% 28% 35% 100% 5 & 6 18% 18% 24% 28% 100%

2 to 4 20% 25% 25% 32% 100% 2 to 4 18% 19% 28% 31% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 21% 26% 30% 49% 100% 9 16% 17% 21% 35% 100%

7 & 8 16% 20% 26% 35% 100% 7 & 8 16% 19% 22% 29% 100%

5 & 6 24% 25% 30% 37% 100% 5 & 6 20% 22% 28% 36% 100%

2 to 4 27% 29% 34% 43% 100% 2 to 4 25% 28% 33% 40% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 25% 25% 75% 75% 100% 9 8% 15% 23% 31% 100%

7 & 8 24% 31% 34% 42% 100% 7 & 8 17% 23% 27% 42% 100%

5 & 6 26% 30% 33% 39% 100% 5 & 6 24% 27% 31% 38% 100%

2 to 4 30% 33% 35% 42% 100% 2 to 4 33% 36% 37% 44% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 0% 0% 25% 25% 100% 9 0% 0% 25% 25% 100%

7 & 8 28% 32% 38% 46% 100% 7 & 8 20% 24% 30% 41% 100%

5 & 6 30% 31% 34% 38% 100% 5 & 6 26% 28% 30% 36% 100%

2 to 4 23% 24% 26% 33% 100% 2 to 4 27% 28% 29% 34% 99%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 50% 50% 50% 50% 100%

7 & 8 24% 27% 34% 42% 100% 7 & 8 22% 24% 28% 38% 100%

5 & 6 33% 39% 44% 51% 100% 5 & 6 28% 31% 38% 44% 100%

2 to 4 29% 31% 38% 47% 100% 2 to 4 26% 29% 35% 43% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 9 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%

7 & 8 19% 19% 21% 31% 100% 7 & 8 20% 20% 22% 28% 100%

5 & 6 29% 31% 32% 40% 100% 5 & 6 27% 30% 31% 38% 100%

2 to 4 20% 20% 22% 32% 100% 2 to 4 24% 26% 29% 36% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 9

7 & 8 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 7 & 8 15% 15% 15% 15% 100%

5 & 6 12% 12% 12% 16% 100% 5 & 6 17% 17% 17% 31% 100%

2 to 4 17% 17% 19% 29% 100% 2 to 4 10% 11% 14% 26% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 14% 14% 14% 14% 100% 9 8% 8% 8% 8% 100%

7 & 8 10% 10% 14% 26% 100% 7 & 8 7% 7% 9% 22% 100%

5 & 6 23% 26% 28% 41% 100% 5 & 6 9% 11% 16% 28% 100%

2 to 4 25% 30% 35% 47% 100% 2 to 4 18% 22% 25% 45% 100%

GB CE

Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0% Grade 100% 70% 51% 30% 0%

9 20% 23% 32% 45% 100% 9 15% 17% 22% 32% 100%

7 & 8 18% 21% 26% 35% 100% 7 & 8 17% 20% 24% 33% 100%

5 & 6 26% 28% 32% 39% 100% 5 & 6 22% 24% 28% 36% 100%

2 to 4 26% 28% 32% 40% 100% 2 to 4 28% 30% 33% 41% 100%

Key: 20% 50% 100%

Date: 2018 quarter 4

General Building (GB) Civil Engineering (CE)


Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%)



Gauteng Gauteng


Kwa-Zulu Natal Kwa-Zulu Natal


Limpopo Limpopo


Mpumalanga Mpumalanga


North West North West


Northern Cape Northern Cape


Western Cape Western Cape




13

Appendix 4: Provincial Data: B-BBEE Level

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

7 & 8 25% 56% 78% 94% 97% 100% 7 & 8 26% 58% 81% 94% 100% 100%

5 & 6 43% 56% 96% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 33% 52% 92% 100% 100% 100%

2 to 4 44% 45% 94% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 42% 44% 93% 100% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9 25% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

7 & 8 21% 32% 79% 0% 0% 0% 7 & 8 14% 32% 82% 86% 93% 96%

5 & 6 36% 44% 90% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 41% 49% 82% 96% 96% 96%

2 to 4 52% 54% 96% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 44% 47% 98% 100% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 5% 38% 81% 90% 90% 90% 9 7% 29% 71% 89% 93% 96%

7 & 8 23% 46% 81% 93% 95% 98% 7 & 8 22% 43% 74% 88% 91% 95%

5 & 6 28% 42% 90% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 24% 38% 91% 98% 99% 99%

2 to 4 25% 27% 95% 99% 100% 100% 2 to 4 30% 39% 95% 100% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 0% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 9 0% 40% 50% 80% 80% 90%

7 & 8 30% 56% 83% 91% 96% 97% 7 & 8 33% 59% 84% 94% 96% 97%

5 & 6 37% 46% 90% 98% 100% 100% 5 & 6 35% 48% 88% 97% 99% 100%

2 to 4 45% 45% 95% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 51% 53% 95% 100% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 50% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 9 50% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

7 & 8 3% 26% 65% 71% 71% 71% 7 & 8 24% 43% 92% 98% 98% 98%

5 & 6 14% 24% 40% 40% 40% 40% 5 & 6 24% 29% 98% 100% 100% 100%

2 to 4 13% 14% 98% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 16% 16% 95% 100% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 9 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

7 & 8 55% 65% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 42% 53% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 & 6 49% 54% 97% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 47% 50% 94% 98% 98% 98%

2 to 4 57% 58% 99% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 50% 54% 97% 100% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

7 & 8 19% 44% 88% 0% 0% 0% 7 & 8 21% 37% 74% 79% 89% 100%

5 & 6 14% 16% 86% 95% 100% 100% 5 & 6 23% 27% 91% 100% 100% 100%

2 to 4 36% 36% 97% 99% 100% 100% 2 to 4 31% 32% 99% 99% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

7 & 8 30% 40% 80% 90% 100% 100% 7 & 8 17% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 & 6 36% 57% 79% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 29% 29% 65% 100% 100% 100%

2 to 4 70% 70% 99% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 69% 72% 95% 100% 100% 100%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 0% 40% 40% 60% 80% 80% 9 30% 50% 80% 80% 90% 90%

7 & 8 32% 51% 78% 89% 92% 95% 7 & 8 21% 69% 79% 90% 97% 100%

5 & 6 59% 72% 84% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 29% 63% 76% 94% 98% 100%

2 to 4 56% 60% 93% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 57% 65% 88% 98% 98% 99%

GB CE

Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 6% 41% 72% 84% 88% 88% 7 & 8 13% 45% 73% 88% 91% 95%

7 & 8 28% 50% 83% 92% 95% 97% 7 & 8 26% 50% 82% 91% 95% 97%

5 & 6 37% 46% 91% 99% 100% 100% 5 & 6 32% 45% 89% 98% 99% 100%

2 to 4 43% 44% 96% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 47% 49% 95% 100% 100% 100%

Key: 20% 80% 100%

Civil Engineering (CE)General Building (GB)




North West North West


Limpopo Limpopo



Northern Cape Northern Cape


Western Cape Western Cape



Mpumalanga Mpumalanga

Gauteng Gauteng

Kwa-Zulu Natal Kwa-Zulu Natal





15

Gauteng Provincial [email protected]

Western Cape Provincial OfficeCape [email protected]

Eastern Cape Provincial [email protected]

Northern Cape Provincial [email protected]

Free State Provincial [email protected]

KwaZulu-Natal Provincial [email protected]

Limpopo Provincial [email protected]

Mpumalanga Provincial OfficeNelspruit (Mbombela)[email protected]

North West Provincial [email protected]

cidb contact number: 086 100 2432

Anonymous Fraud Line: 0800 11 24 32

email: [email protected]

Documents

cidb Quarterly Monitor; Transformation; 2019 Q4 · 2 2. Transformation of the Construction Industry 2.1 Background and Context This cidb Construction Monitor – Transformation draws