Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Masonic Cancer Center
Comprehensive Cancer Center designated by the National Cancer Institute
GOAL
Cigarette relighting – implications for tobacco constituents
A.Alcheva1,2, A.Farah3, M.Steinberg4, C.Heckman4, O.Wackowski4, C.Delnevo4, D.Hatsukami2,5,6, I.Stepanov1,2
University of Minnesota - Division of Environmental Health Sciences1; Masonic Cancer Center2; College of Biological Sciences3; Rutgers School of Public Health4;Tobacco Research Programs5; Department of Psychiatry6
To investigate the potential effect on cigarette relighting on key chemical constituentsimplicated in addictiveness, toxicity, and carcinogenicity of tobacco and cigarette smoke.
INTRODUCTION
MASONIC CANCER CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455
REFERENCESSUMMARY
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
METHODS
RESULTS
This study was supported by NCI through the NIH Tobacco Regulatory Science Program (R01-CA179246) and UMF0011369 from UMN. LC-MS/MS was carried out in the Analytical Biochemistry Shared Resource of the Cancer Center.We thank Bob Carlson for graphic design assistance
Nicotine levels in the filler of original and half-smoked cigarette
Difference in smoke nicotine levels between first and second cigarette halves
Difference in aldehyde levels between first and second cigarette halves
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Marlboro Gold Marlboro Gold 100s Marlboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol100s
3R4F 1R5F
Nicotine Tobacco filler2nd half ISO2nd half CI
mg/
gr
TSNA levels in the filler of original and half-smoked cigarettes
0
2
4
6
8
10
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol
100s
3R4F 1R5F
ISO smoking regime 1st half
2nd half
0
5
10
15
20
25
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol
100s
3R4F 1R5F
CI smoking regime 1st half2nd half
Total particulate matter (TPM) in the smoke of first and second cigarette halves
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol
100s
3R4F 1R5F
NNN under ISO smoking regime
-10%0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol
100s
3R4F 1R5F
NNK under ISO smoking regime
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol
100s
3R4F 1R5F
NNN under CI smoking regime
-40%-30%-20%-10%
0%10%20%30%40%50%
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol
100s
3R4F 1R5F
NNK under CI smoking regime
-15%-10%-5%0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%
Marlboro GoldMarlboro Gold100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol 100s
3R4F 1R5F
ISO smoking regime
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol 100s
3R4F 1R5F
CI smoking regime
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol 100s
3R4F 1R5F
NNNtobaccofiller
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
MarlboroGold
MarlboroGold 100s
MarlboroMenthol
MarlboroMenthol 100s
3R4F 1R5F
NNKtobacco filler
2nd half CI
ng/g
r
ng/g
r
mg/
cig
mg/
cig
• Overall, there was an increase in nicotine in the left over tobacco filler of half-smoked cigarette using ISO
and CI smoking regimens• Levels of tobacco specific nitrosamines (NNN, NNK) were higher in the leftover tobacco filler of half-
smoked cigarette under CI regime, on average, NNK increased by 38%. • Similarly, levels of nicotine and nitrosamines in smoke increased in the 2nd half of the cigarette smoked
under both regimens, ISO and CI • Generally, there was increase in aldehyde levels under both smoking regimens. On average, acetaldehyde,
respiratory toxicant and carcinogen, increased in the 2nd half of the cigarette smoke by 86% and 37% for ISO and CI respectively
• Re-lighting a cigarette might expose smokers to higher levels of nicotine and carcinogens than exposures from the first half of the same cigarette, potentially posing increased health risks
• Study on tobacco smoke toxicants and carcinogens exposure in smokers engaging in relighting behavior is underway
Alkaloids
Tobacco filler (200 mg)
Tobacco specific nitrosamines
Extraction (1 hour) 10 mM ammonium acetate
Internal standard• 13C6NNN; D4NNKPurification • ChemElut, Silica
Dilution Internal standard• D3Nicotine; D4 minor
alkaloids
Column• Zorbax SB C-18Mobile phase • A: 10mM NH4OAC • B: Methanol
Column• HypercarbMobile phase • A: 0.0% FA in NH4OAC • B: Methanol
LC-MS/MS
Filter pads
-50%0%
50%100%150%200%250%300%350%400%450%
Form
alde
hyde
Ace
tald
ehyd
e
Ace
tone
Acr
olei
n
Pro
pion
alde
hyde
Cro
tona
ldeh
yde
But
anon
e
But
yral
dehy
de
ISO smoking regime
Marlboro Gold Marlboro Gold 100s Marlboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 100s 3R4F 1R5F
Findings from analysis of left over tobacco filler of half-smoked cigarette
Findings from analysis of smoke of re-lit cigarette
Smoke
Column• Phenomenex Luna C18(2)Mobile phase • A: Water:ACN:THF:IPA 59:30:10:1• B: Water:ACN:THF:IPA
35:65:1:1
• Derivatization with 15ml DNPH (2 impingers)• Determination with 1% Trizma
HPLC – UV
Aldehydes
Relighting – extinguishing, saving, and later relighting unfinished cigarette butts is prevalent behavior with 44-73% of current smokers reporting that they relight cigarettes, 17-21% of those say they relight ‘usually’ or ‘frequently.’1 Certain vulnerable populations such as racial/ethnic minorities, people of low socioeconomic status (SES), LGBT persons and those suffering from mental illness are disproportionately affected by tobacco-associated diseases and are more likely to engage in relighting behavior2.Variety of chemical and physical processes are occurring during cigarette combustion resulting with formation of complex smoke mixture. As smoke is drawn through tobacco a portion of the combusted tobacco constituents are deposited on the unheated tobacco at the proximal end of the cigarette3. Extinguishing and later relighting unfinished cigarette could contribute towards substantial changes in the chemistry of the tobacco and cigarette smoke. Therefore better understanding of the exposures to tobacco smoke toxicants and carcinogens from relit cigarettes and its implications for tobacco related disease is needed.
Addictive constituent Carcinogens Respiratory toxicants
Nicotine
1. Cunningham JA, Selby P. Relighting cigarettes: how common is it? Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(5):621-623.
2. Kaufman, Annette R. “Cigarette Smoking Risk-Reducing Beliefs: Findings from the US Health Information Trends Survey.” Preventative Medicine, Science Direct, Sept. 2017,
3. Richard R. Baker,Product formation mechanisms inside a burning cigarette, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Volume 7, Issue 2,1981, Pages 135-153, ISSN 0360-1285
Difference in smoke TSNA levels between first and second cigarette halves %
cha
nge
in2nd
vs. 1
stha
lf
% c
hang
e in
2ndvs
. 1st
half
% c
hang
e in
2ndvs
. 1st
half
% c
hang
e in
2ndvs
. 1st
half
% c
hang
e in
2ndvs
. 1st
half
% c
hang
e in
2ndvs
. 1st
half
% c
hang
e in
2ndvs
. 1st
half
% c
hang
e in
2ndvs
. 1st
half
-100%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
Form
alde
hyde
Ace
tald
ehyd
e
Ace
tone
Acr
olei
n
Pro
pion
alde
hyde
Cro
tona
ldeh
yde
But
anon
e
But
yral
dehy
de
CI smoking regime
Marlboro Gold Marlboro Gold 100s Marlboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 100s 3R4F 1R5F