101
CITGO FOOD MART #115 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN MODIFICATION ATTF CP-25 PREPARED FOR A. W. Herndon Oil Company, Inc. PO Box 640 Abbeville, Henry Co., AL DATE October 12, 2018 PREPARED BY CDG Engineers & Associates, Inc. 3 Riverchase Ridge Hoover, Alabama 35244 Citgo Food Mart #115 2154 Denton Road Dothan, Houston Co., AL Fac ID 10037-069-012234 UST13-08-03

CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

CITGO FOOD MART #115 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN MODIFICATION

ATTF CP-25

PREPARED FOR

A. W. Herndon Oil Company, Inc.

PO Box 640

Abbeville, Henry Co., AL

DATE

October 12, 2018

PREPARED BY

CDG Engineers & Associates, Inc.

3 Riverchase Ridge

Hoover, Alabama 35244

Citgo Food Mart #115

2154 Denton Road

Dothan, Houston Co., AL

Fac ID 10037-069-012234

UST13-08-03

Page 2: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 3: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

6

1.0 SITE LOCATION AND HISTORY

The Citgo Food Mart #115 site is an active gas station located at 2154 Denton Road, Dothan,

Alabama 36303. The facility contains a storage and distribution system for the retail sale of

gasoline to the public. Topographically the site is an area of moderate relief in northwest

Houston County. The geographical coordinates are Latitude 31 15’ 19.55” North, Longitude 85°

24’ 42.48” West.

The Citgo Food Mart #115 facility was purchased by Mr. Dinubhai Patel in August 2013 and was

currently in operation as a retail fueling/service station at that time. The UST’s and product

distribution system remain in operation at the site. The Citgo Food Mart #115 facility was

constructed in 1986. The site was previously owned by A. W. Herndon Oil Company, Inc. before

being sold to Mr. Dinubhai Patel in August 2013. The product storage system is comprised of

three 10,000 gallon steel USTs which were installed in 1983. The USTs are used to store

unleaded gasoline and have cathodic protection installed. The product lines at the subject site

are fiberglass and transfer product from the tank hold to three dispensers. This site has not

been involved in any prior environmental assessments.

2.0 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS SITE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES

On August 8, 2013, CDG Engineers & Associates, Inc. (CDG) mobilized equipment and personnel

to the subject facility to conduct a Limited Phase II Investigation. The purpose of the

investigation was to determine if there was evidence that a release of petroleum product had

occurred at the site as required by the lending institution financing the property purchase. The

investigation involved the collection of depth-representative soil samples, the collection of a

groundwater sample, a site reconnaissance to identify any evidence of a petroleum release, and

a review of the USTs and product distribution system at the site.

Two soil borings (SB-1 and SB-2) were advanced near the USTs and dispensers at the locations

as MW-1 and MW-2. The soil borings were advanced by a conventional drill rig using the hollow

stem auger (HSA) drilling method. The borings were drilled using 6 5/8 inch OD hollow stem

augers and reached a maximum depth of 37 ft-bls, respectively. As each soil boring was

advanced, continuous soil cores were collected using 5-foot split-spoon samplers advanced 2 to

3 inches ahead of the auger bit.

Page 4: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

7

Each soil boring was sampled continuously at two foot intervals to a total depth of 37 ft-bls with

soil lithology recorded by CDG field personnel. A soil headspace survey was conducted to aid in

identifying potential petroleum impacted soil. The borings were field screened at two foot

intervals for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with a MiniRae 3000

Photoionization Detector (PID). The PID instrument readings were used as a field screening

measure to aid in selection of samples for further evaluation via laboratory chemical analysis.

The soils encountered in each borehole consisted primarily of slight to moderately stiff, fine

grain clayey sand with inter-bedded thin sand layers.

Soil confirmation samples were collected from each of the soil borings based on field screening

results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the

presence of BTEX/MTBE compounds according to EPA Method 8260C, Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons by FL-PRO Method, and Lead by Method 6010B. All constituents analyzed for in

the soil samples reported results below laboratory detection limits or below the Commercial ISL

established for these compounds.

In order to evaluate groundwater impacts, monitoring wells were installed in each boring.

Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 were completed at a depth of 37 ft-bls. Each monitoring

well was constructed of 22 feet of 2-inch Johnson PVC solid riser with 15 feet of 0.010-inch

slotted PVC screen. Graded filter sand (.45-.55mm) was placed into the annular space of the

well to a level of 2 feet above the top of the screen. A 1-foot thick bentonite pellet seal was

placed on top of the sand pack and the remaining annular space was then sealed with a

cement/bentonite grout mixture. The wells were then completed with an 8 inch steel manway

with bolt down lids and a locking well seal. Following completion, each of the monitoring wells

was developed using a submersible pump until clear and/or silt free water was being produced.

Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 and submitted to

Test America, Inc. located in Tallahassee, Florida for laboratory confirmation analyses.

Submitted samples were analyzed for the presence of BTEX/MTBE compounds according to EPA

Method 8260C, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by FL-PRO Method, and Lead by Method 6010B.

Monitoring well MW-2 contained reported concentration levels of MTBE, Benzene, Toluene and

Ethylbenzene exceeding the ISLs established by ADEM for groundwater at commercial sites. As

a result, a release report was submitted to ADEM on August 21, 2013 documenting the release.

Page 5: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

8

In a letter dated September 6, 2013, ADEM issued a notification of requirement to conduct

investigative and corrective actions at the subject facility.

The preliminary investigation activities were conducted on October 28 & 29, 2013 and October

31, 2013. The investigation activities included the advancement of four soil borings, with

groundwater monitoring wells being constructed in each boring.

Based on the results of the Preliminary Investigation, CDG developed CP#2 to complete an On-

site Secondary Investigation at the subject facility. In a letter dated February 18, 2014, ADEM

approved the work plan and associated cost proposal to complete the Investigation. CDG

mobilized drilling equipment to the site on March 17, 2014 to initiate the secondary drilling

activities. Based on the results of the On-Site Secondary Investigation, CDG developed an

addendum to CP#2 to obtain off-site access and install two (2) additional monitoring wells in an

effort to delineate the contaminant plume north of monitoring well MW-9. The addendum was

approved by ADEM on May 1, 2014 and the additional wells installed on May 12, 2014. The On-

Site Secondary Investigation Report was submitted to ADEM on June 2, 2014 and was approved

on June 23, 2014. The 1st Tri-Annual groundwater monitoring report was submitted to the

department on August 4, 2014 and approved on September 16, 2014.

In a letter dated September 16, 2014, ADEM requested that an additional Type III well be

installed to further define the vertical extent of groundwater contamination. The additional

well (VW-2) was installed in November of 2014, and the report submitted to the department on

December 11, 2014 was approved on February 4, 2015. The 2nd tri-annual groundwater

monitoring report was submitted to ADEM on January 23, 2015 and approval was received on

February 26, 2015. The 3rd tri-annual groundwater monitoring report was submitted to ADEM

on April 24, 2015 and approval was received on May 12, 2015.

During the 4th tri-annual groundwater monitoring event, recovery well RW-1 was installed for

the Pilot Test. This well was sampled as part of the 4th tri-annual event before the pilot test was

conducted to obtain a base line sample. The Pilot Test Report and 4th Tri-Annual GWM Report

were submitted to the Department on October 12, 2015, and approval for both reports was

received on October 22, 2015. A corrective Action Plan Evaluation was submitted to the

Department on January 22, 2016 and approval was received on February 11, 2016. In the CAP

Evaluation approval letter, CDG was asked to submit a Corrective Action Plan Development. The

Page 6: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

9

5th Tri-Annual GWM Report was submitted to the Department on February 23, 2016, and

approval was received on March 3, 2016. The most recent Tri-Annual GWM report was

submitted to ADEM on August 28, 2018 under the approved cost proposal CP-22.

3.0 REMEDIATION RECOMMENDATION PLAN

To address the existing levels of groundwater contamination at the site, the following approach

is recommended:

The proposed corrective action involves allowing natural attenuation in combination with

quarterly MEME events to continue to reduce contaminant concentrations to acceptable levels

for site closure. Quarterly groundwater monitoring events will be conducted for up to two

years to monitor the natural attenuation progress toward the remediation goals. Monitoring

wells will be sampled for BTEX and MTBE analytes and for natural attenuation parameters (DO,

pH, and ORP). Following four (4) quarterly groundwater-monitoring events, CDG will

recommend the site for No Further Action (NFA) status if remediation goals have been met.

Should target levels continue to exceed the ACALs in the source area after one year of

monitoring and the contaminant plume maintains a stable or decreasing trend, groundwater

monitoring should be continued. If COC concentrations increase based on future monitoring

results, the CAP approach should be re-evaluated.

4.0 PROPOSED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

CDG will submit reports in accordance with ADEM requirements. These reports will include the

following:

Reporting of Natural Attenuation Effectiveness - CDG proposes to submit quarterly NAMR

reports, which will summarize field activities and the progress of site groundwater constituent

concentrations towards achieving approved corrective action levels. The following data will be

included in each report: field activities performed, groundwater elevations, groundwater

analytical results as compared to target levels, MEME event results, potentiometric surface

maps, and BTEX and MTBE constituent concentration maps. The reports will also include

remediation effectiveness and recommendations concerning additional measures deemed

necessary.

Page 7: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

10

Request for Closure Evaluation of Corrective Action - This report will include data that shows

that remediation goals have been achieved and request a status of NFA. Methods for

abandonment of monitoring and recovery wells will be described.

Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure of the site and removal of all

monitoring wells.

5.0 SCHEDULE OF IMPLEMENTATION

It is anticipated that the proposed CAP will begin with the first groundwater monitoring and

free product recovery event following the approval of the CAP. The following schedule

indicates the timetable for major project events to be completed as part of this corrective

action plan:

Time Following Cap

Approval (months)

Project Event Project Event

Length

0 – 24 Quarterly groundwater monitoring and free product

recovery events every three months, evaluation of

performance, and recommendations for further

corrective action if required

2 Years

25 Well abandonment; completion and submittal of final

report if allowable by ADEM

2 Months

6.0 PROPOSED FREE PRODUCT RECOVERY AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING ACTIVITIES

Following the approval of the CAP, quarterly 24-hour duration MEME events will be conducted

at the site in order to remove free product and reduce dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations in

the source area. Each 24-hour MEME event will be conducted using a mobile system operated

by Brown Remediation, Inc, pending availability. The primary objective will be to maximize PCW

removal utilizing total fluids extraction from recovery well MW-2, MW-5, and RW-1 at a

minimum.

Page 8: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

11

ADEM has previously approved the proposed MEME events for use at numerous locations in

Alabama for free product recovery, emergency response, and pilot testing activities. The unit

operates with continuously monitored off-gas treatment (thermal destruction). Recovered

groundwater (and free product if present) will be pumped to a temporary storage tank for

testing and later disposal at an approved facility according to ADEM requirements. Prior to

recovery activities, static water levels in all site wells will be recorded. A drop-tube will be

inserted into the extraction well and lowered as necessary to maximize recovery. Applied

vacuums in extraction well MW-2, MW-5, and RW-1 and casing vacuums in surrounding

monitoring wells will be recorded periodically during operations (except when the unit is not

attended). Measurements of flow and hydrocarbon concentrations will also be obtained

periodically. Field measurements will be obtained using a calibrated Flame Ionization Detector

(FID) instrument. Hydrocarbon removal rates will be calculated and recorded. Cumulative fluid

recovery volumes will be measured and recorded (at approximately 1-hour intervals) to

determine removal rates. All of the wells at the site will be gauged immediately prior to and

after the recovery event.

Approximately two weeks following each MEME event, groundwater samples will be collected

quarterly from all monitoring wells. The groundwater samples will be collected from the

monitoring wells using new clean plastic bailers and transferred to 40 milliliter (mL) glass

volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials preserved with hydrochloric acid (HCl) for BTEX, MTBE and

naphthalene analysis using EPA Method 8260B. During each groundwater sampling event, all

monitoring wells will also be sampled for natural attenuation parameters (DO, pH, and ORP).

The natural attenuation parameters will provide information concerning the recovery of the

shallow aquifer down gradient of the release area.

The results of the proposed activities will be submitted to the ADEM in the form of a

RNA/MEME Report. The report will include conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the

recovery activities performed, and recommendations for future site activities.

Page 9: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….A

Figures ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….BSite Location USGS Topographic Map

Site Map with Well Locations

Soil Analytical Map

Lithologic Cross Section

Potentiomatric Surface Contour Map - May 17, 2018

Groundwater / Benzene Concetration and Isocontour Map - May 17, 2018

Approved ARBCA SSTLs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….C

Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..D

Site Health and Safety Plan …………………………………………………………………………………….E

ADEM Forms……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………F

Tasks Performance Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………G

APPENDICES

Appendices

Page 10: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

TABLES

APPENDIX A

Page 11: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

08/09/13 20.21 300.38 - - 08/09/13 6.26 4.95 16310/31/13 18.47 302.12 - - 10/31/13 0.91 5.40 7.503/31/14 17.49 303.10 - - 04/01/14 1.11 4.97 23107/14/14 17.08 303.51 - - 07/14/14 4.68 3.49 12512/11/14 22.01 298.58 - - 12/11/14 1.50 4.88 100.803/12/15 22.51 298.08 - - 03/12/15 1.50 4.38 30909/15/15 22.45 298.14 - - 09/16/15 1.40 4.44 22501/13/16 19.01 301.58 - - 01/13/16 1.96 5.12 73.805/11/16 15.85 304.74 - - 05/12/16 1.80 6.86 15607/14/16 17.94 302.65 - 9.0 07/14/16 1.27 4.83 94.311/14/16 22.12 298.47 - - 11/14/16 0.89 4.00 10602/23/17 19.15 301.44 - - 02/23/17 3.94 4.53 7706/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/13/18 23.45 297.14 - - 02/13/18 1.14 4.60 -22.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-1

08/08/13 37 22-37 320.59

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 12: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

08/09/13 0.0120 0.0021 0.0032 0.0014 0.0068 0.0135 -10/31/13 0.0087 0.0014 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0014 <0.00104/01/14 0.0101 0.0017 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0017 0.001107/14/14 0.0091 0.0023 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0023 0.001212/11/14 0.0073 0.0022 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 0.0022 <0.00503/12/15 0.0036 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/16/15 0.0064 0.0011 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0011 <0.00101/13/16 0.0027 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00105/12/16 0.0027 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/14/16 0.0026 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00111/14/16 0.0017 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 0.0013 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/13/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.6610 0.1650 33.1000 23.2000 175.0000 0.6610Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-1

08/08/13 37 22-37 320.59

NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Page 13: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

08/09/13 30.62 291.28 - - 08/09/13 4.33 5.04 14910/31/13 24.82 297.08 - - 10/31/13 0.72 5.14 1203/31/14 22.73 299.17 - - 04/01/14 1.35 5.33 6207/14/14 22.85 299.05 - - 07/14/14 8.62 2.64 11212/11/14 27.98 293.92 - - 12/11/14 1.83 5.26 64.803/12/15 27.68 294.22 - - 03/12/15 0.40 4.81 -1009/15/15 28.01 293.89 - 5.0 09/15/15 1.29 6.74 1.201/13/16 24.26 297.64 - 6.0 01/13/16 0.97 5.07 2405/11/16 21.30 300.60 - 7.5 05/11/16 1.92 7.20 -14207/14/16 23.91 297.99 - 8.0 07/14/16 0.50 5.35 -18.411/14/16 26.84 295.06 - 5.0 11/15/16 0.67 4.86 -1702/23/17 24.74 297.16 - 6.0 02/24/17 0.79 5.32 -18106/21/17 30.00 291.90 - 3.5 06/21/17 1.76 5.28 -193.010/23/17 26.99 294.91 - 5.0 10/23/17 3.30 5.14 -110.102/19/18 29.54 292.36 - 3.5 02/19/18 1.49 5.33 -93.005/17/18 28.64 293.26 - 4.0 05/17/18 3.55 5.75 -122.7

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-2

08/08/13 37.45 22.45-37.45 321.90

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 14: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

08/09/13 4.5000 3.4000 4.4000 1.4000 8.5000 17.7000 -10/31/13 1.3268 1.4854 1.1230 1.2215 6.0875 9.9174 0.609004/01/14 1.3272 1.3140 0.6331 0.8657 4.8448 7.6576 0.644407/14/14 1.6008 2.1151 0.7450 1.1565 6.4555 10.4721 0.735812/11/14 1.5000 1.5000 0.3800 0.9100 3.6000 6.3900 0.620003/12/15 2.7241 1.8713 0.4162 0.6033 3.7257 6.6165 0.891609/15/15 1.9397 1.7797 0.4252 1.1940 4.2541 7.6530 0.735201/13/16 1.2097 1.0997 0.3338 0.9086 3.8244 6.1665 0.664105/11/16 0.6520 0.9100 0.2310 0.9960 3.4700 5.6070 0.562007/14/16 1.5580 1.9007 0.3066 1.0534 3.9562 7.2169 0.618311/15/16 1.1872 1.0849 0.1874 0.6586 2.8026 4.7335 0.478302/24/17 0.4540 0.5740 0.1934 0.8682 3.3009 4.9366 0.512706/21/17 1.2271 1.3678 0.2979 1.2377 4.0191 6.9225 0.832110/23/17 2.1679 2.1600 0.5321 1.6764 4.2599 8.6285 0.898502/19/18 2.6700 2.9800 0.6450 1.3100 1.6700 6.6050 0.602005/17/18 3.0750 2.3497 0.7312 1.1467 2.0916 6.3192 0.6530

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2170 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-2

08/08/13 37.45 22.45-37.45 321.90

Page 15: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

10/31/13 26.50 296.50 - - 10/31/13 1.85 5.99 2703/31/14 24.35 298.65 - - 03/31/14 1.68 5.35 16707/14/14 23.95 299.05 - - 07/14/14 8.31 3.81 10612/11/14 28.91 294.09 - - 12/11/14 4.01 5.36 20203/12/15 28.71 294.29 - - 03/12/15 4.50 4.75 5909/15/15 28.98 294.02 - 3.0 09/15/15 4.98 4.58 19901/13/16 25.70 297.30 - 5.0 01/13/16 1.09 4.89 8205/11/16 22.80 300.20 - 6.0 05/11/16 2.38 6.89 9507/14/16 25.14 297.86 - 5.0 07/14/16 2.96 4.97 13111/14/16 27.89 295.11 - 3.5 11/15/16 1.16 4.52 11902/23/17 25.90 297.10 - 4.5 02/23/17 1.23 4.83 -5506/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/19/18 30.49 292.51 - 2.0 02/19/18 5.47 4.57 167.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-3

10/28/13 35 20-35 323.00

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 16: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

10/31/13 0.1260 0.0082 <0.001 <0.001 0.0013 0.0095 0.001003/31/14 0.2456 0.0036 <0.001 <0.001 0.0028 0.0064 <0.00107/14/14 0.1012 0.0040 <0.001 <0.001 0.0011 0.0051 <0.00112/11/14 0.0570 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/12/15 0.0587 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/15/15 0.0782 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/16 0.0033 0.0174 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0174 <0.00105/11/16 0.0490 0.0192 <0.005 <0.001 0.0010 0.0202 <0.00507/14/16 0.1827 0.0058 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0058 <0.00111/15/16 0.1787 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 0.0034 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/19/18 0.0410 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2160 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-3

10/28/13 35 20-35 323.00

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 17: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

10/31/13 10.00 312.50 - - 10/31/13 5.41 5.07 5803/31/14 4.08 318.42 - - 03/31/14 1.23 5.28 18607/14/14 12.16 310.34 - - 07/14/14 5.97 3.93 8112/11/14 18.26 304.24 - - 12/11/14 1.84 5.07 13003/12/15 11.15 311.35 - - 03/12/15 0.14 4.59 -1809/15/15 17.07 305.43 - 9.0 09/15/15 1.34 5.16 110.401/13/16 3.89 318.61 - 5.0 01/14/16 2.61 4.78 7805/11/16 8.10 314.40 - 13.0 05/11/16 2.50 7.39 -2407/14/16 14.29 308.21 - 10.0 07/14/16 2.70 6.57 6911/14/16 18.54 303.96 - 8.0 11/15/16 0.56 4.28 4302/23/17 4.85 317.65 - 14.5 02/23/17 1.25 5.00 -14306/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/13/18 13.61 308.89 - 10.0 02/13/18 0.85 4.62 -80.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-4

10/28/13 35 20-35 322.50

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 18: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

10/31/13 0.0088 0.0188 <0.001 <0.001 0.0039 0.0227 <0.00103/31/14 0.0050 0.0361 <0.001 <0.001 0.0044 0.0405 <0.00107/14/14 0.0026 0.0406 0.0010 <0.001 0.0048 0.0464 <0.00112/11/14 0.0038 0.0290 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 0.0290 <0.00503/12/15 0.0020 0.0703 0.0014 <0.001 0.0065 0.0782 <0.00109/15/15 0.0031 0.0765 <0.001 <0.001 0.0059 0.0824 <0.00101/14/16 0.0029 0.0733 0.0027 0.0014 0.0190 0.0964 <0.00105/11/16 0.0044 0.1070 <0.005 <0.001 0.0120 0.1190 <0.00507/14/16 0.0031 0.0888 0.0020 <0.001 0.0058 0.0966 <0.00111/15/16 0.0071 0.0888 <0.001 <0.001 0.0056 0.0944 <0.00102/23/17 0.0045 0.0860 0.0019 <0.001 0.0067 0.0946 <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/13/18 <0.001 0.0820 <0.005 <0.001 0.0070 0.0890 <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2170 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-4

10/28/13 35 20-35 322.50

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 19: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

10/31/13 16.79 304.19 - - 10/31/13 3.02 5.73 2303/31/14 14.68 306.30 - - 03/31/14 0.63 8.45 -17707/14/14 15.67 305.31 - - 07/14/14 6.35 5.27 -5512/11/14 21.25 299.73 - - 12/11/14 1.66 6.04 203/12/15 21.24 299.74 - - 03/12/15 0.32 5.85 -16709/15/15 21.35 299.63 - 4.0 09/15/15 0.79 5.81 -5401/13/16 16.25 304.73 - 2.5 01/19/16 2.38 7.32 -15105/11/16 14.48 306.50 - 7.0 05/12/16 2.30 6.93 -4207/14/16 16.84 304.14 - 6.5 07/15/16 0.66 6.02 -90.511/14/16 20.11 300.87 - 5.0 11/15/16 0.45 4.60 302/23/17 18.30 302.68 - 5.5 02/24/17 0.93 5.79 -18006/21/17 23.15 297.83 - 3.0 06/21/17 1.98 5.33 -190.010/23/17 21.99 298.99 - 4.0 10/23/17 2.51 5.16 -106.002/13/18 22.31 298.67 - 3.5 02/13/18 0.78 5.38 -50.005/17/18 21.55 299.43 - 4.0 05/17/18 0.97 5.87 -73.5

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-5

10/29/13 30 15-30 320.98

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 20: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

10/31/13 0.1481 2.6964 5.0432 1.7464 9.1364 18.6223 0.631904/01/14 0.2655 2.9316 6.1598 1.4864 6.7051 17.2829 0.474507/14/14 0.1237 2.4550 5.0498 1.2926 5.2355 14.0329 0.301012/11/14 0.0980 1.6000 3.5000 0.9600 2.9000 8.9600 0.230003/12/15 0.1391 2.8996 6.1987 1.2393 5.3446 15.6822 0.755609/15/15 0.2505 3.6625 9.3876 1.7691 7.4101 22.2293 0.506901/19/16 0.1795 3.5144 9.9360 2.0232 9.6223 25.0959 0.534805/12/16 0.0439 1.4100 3.3200 1.0400 3.5800 9.3500 0.152007/15/16 <0.05 0.8748 1.4369 0.6024 2.0557 4.9698 0.178311/15/16 <0.05 0.7393 1.2167 0.3926 1.2784 3.6270 0.075802/24/17 0.1128 1.6857 6.3119 0.9757 4.2558 13.2291 0.240706/21/17 0.0314 0.7412 1.7683 0.7560 2.5900 5.8555 0.202210/23/17 0.1311 2.9084 10.6187 1.9478 8.0557 23.5305 0.471202/13/18 0.0590 2.2400 5.1300 1.1700 4.4800 13.0200 0.297005/17/18 0.0967 2.5704 11.2195 1.6961 7.8997 23.3857 0.4635

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2170 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-5

10/29/13 30 15-30 320.98

Page 21: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

10/31/13 23.66 297.42 - - 10/31/13 0.32 5.45 3803/31/14 21.80 299.28 - - 04/01/14 0.81 5.34 6907/14/14 21.99 299.09 - - 07/14/14 5.45 6.83 -6812/11/14 21.21 299.87 - - 12/11/14 1.26 5.23 7003/12/15 26.82 294.26 - - 03/12/15 0.30 5.16 -9109/15/15 27.19 293.89 - 4.0 09/15/15 1.05 4.59 7501/13/16 23.45 297.63 - 6.0 01/19/16 1.40 6.79 -12505/11/16 20.60 300.48 - 7.0 05/16/16 1.06 5.13 -7007/14/16 23.21 297.87 - 5.5 07/15/16 0.46 5.62 -2911/14/16 26.04 295.04 - 4.5 11/15/16 0.50 4.68 902/23/17 24.38 296.70 - 5.0 02/24/17 0.68 5.25 -18006/21/17 30.96 290.12 - 2.0 06/21/17 1.81 5.21 -190.010/23/17 26.22 294.86 - 4.0 10/23/17 2.81 5.20 -123.002/19/18 28.71 292.37 - 3.0 02/19/18 1.36 5.80 -61.005/18/18 27.65 293.43 - 1.0 05/18/18 1.67 5.61 -87.7

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-6

10/29/13 35 20-35 321.08

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 22: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

10/31/13 0.1503 1.4137 0.1145 0.5507 0.8330 2.9120 0.123904/01/14 0.1092 0.3273 0.0233 0.1482 0.1810 0.6798 0.266507/14/14 0.0953 0.3373 0.0144 0.1940 0.1438 0.6895 0.162712/11/14 0.2800 0.8100 0.0800 0.3400 0.2000 1.4300 0.230003/12/15 0.1555 0.3995 0.0165 0.2187* 0.0998 0.5158 0.195309/15/15 0.2825 0.6866 0.0275 0.2957 0.1531 1.1629 0.245201/19/16 0.0651 0.2214 0.0738 0.1918 1.0484 1.5354 0.264105/16/16 0.0218 0.1300 0.0278 0.1310 0.9330 1.2218 0.112007/15/16 0.0324 0.0958 0.0068 0.0553 0.1398 0.2977 0.060911/15/16 0.0866 0.2327 0.0074 0.0745 0.0434 0.3580 0.075802/24/17 0.0453 0.1648 0.0086 0.1020 0.1244 0.3999 0.090606/21/17 0.1532 0.4596 0.0282 0.2692 0.2942 1.0512 0.206910/23/17 0.0860 0.2739 0.0128 0.1539 0.1005 0.5412 0.114902/19/18 0.0060 0.0270 <0.005 0.0140 0.0030 0.0440 0.008005/18/18 0.0593 0.1877 0.0083 0.1007 0.0528 0.3494 0.0854

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2170 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-6

10/29/13 35 20-35 321.08

Page 23: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 9.83 310.79 - - 04/01/14 5.40 5.24 19907/14/14 14.68 305.94 - - 07/14/14 6.75 3.74 10412/11/14 20.29 300.33 - - 12/11/14 2.25 4.83 16603/12/15 18.06 302.56 - - 03/13/15 3.52 4.36 16609/15/15 19.75 300.87 - - 09/16/15 2.44 4.31 21501/13/16 11.91 308.71 - - 01/13/16 3.71 4.73 9005/11/16 13.30 307.32 - 7.0 05/16/16 2.37 4.46 10107/14/16 16.01 304.61 - - 07/15/16 2.59 4.93 11811/14/16 19.50 301.12 - - 11/14/16 0.90 4.03 10802/23/17 12.18 308.44 - - 02/23/17 4.10 4.63 13906/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/13/18 17.21 303.41 - - 02/13/18 1.62 4.45 -18.00

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-7

03/19/14 28 13-28 320.62

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 24: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

04/01/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00107/14/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00112/11/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/13/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/16/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00105/16/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 0.0011 0.0011 <0.00507/15/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00111/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/13/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.8420 0.2100 42.1000 29.5000 175.0000 0.8420Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-7

03/19/14 28 13-28 320.62

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 25: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 7.81 312.86 - - 04/01/14 5.70 5.33 18207/14/14 15.45 305.22 - - 07/14/14 8.04 3.64 12812/11/14 21.15 299.52 - - 12/11/14 3.18 4.92 119.903/12/15 17.15 303.52 - - 03/13/15 5.66 4.37 25409/15/15 20.31 300.36 - - 09/16/15 4.75 4.34 22601/13/16 9.41 311.26 - - 01/13/16 3.93 5.19 8105/11/16 11.50 309.17 - - 05/12/16 4.47 7.04 20407/14/16 19.01 301.66 - - 07/15/16 4.69 4.76 10211/14/16 20.41 300.26 - - 11/14/16 1.07 4.05 10902/23/17 10.23 310.44 - - 02/23/17 5.60 4.75 14906/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/13/18 15.55 305.12 - - 02/13/18 3.28 4.42 4.00

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-8

03/17/14 28 13-28 320.67

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 26: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

04/01/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00107/14/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00112/11/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/13/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/16/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00105/12/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/15/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00111/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/13/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.6230 0.1560 31.1000 21.8000 175.0000 0.6230Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-8

03/17/14 28 13-28 320.67

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 27: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 17.83 303.68 - - 03/31/14 5.39 5.93 16607/14/14 20.83 300.68 - - 07/14/14 7.28 3.25 12012/11/14 26.82 294.69 - - 12/11/14 3.90 5.37 102.803/12/15 25.62 295.89 - - 03/12/15 0.20 5.20 -8509/15/15 26.31 295.20 - 4.0 09/15/15 1.19 5.60 4101/13/16 16.82 304.69 - 9.0 01/19/16 1.78 6.71 -10805/11/16 17.92 303.59 - 8.0 05/11/16 1.64 7.20 -207/14/16 22.09 299.42 - 6.0 07/14/16 0.89 6.17 -4611/14/16 26.53 294.98 - 4.0 11/15/16 0.55 4.72 2202/23/17 12.38 309.13 - 11.0 02/23/17 1.27 5.26 -13906/21/17 25.61 295.90 - 4.5 06/21/17 1.98 6.01 -173.010/23/17 22.47 299.04 - 6.0 10/23/17 2.84 5.71 -109.002/13/18 15.91 305.60 - 9.0 02/13/18 1.00 5.51 -102.005/17/18 20.41 301.10 - 7.0 05/17/18 1.22 5.26 -21.2

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-9

03/17/14 35 20-35 321.51

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 28: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

03/31/14 2.8934 0.1912 0.0046 0.0048 0.1275 0.3281 0.010107/14/14 3.3159 0.6959 <0.025 0.0369 0.3702 1.1030 0.135312/11/14 2.5000 0.6400 <0.02 0.0300 <0.06 0.6700 <0.103/12/15 2.9663 0.6308 <0.025 0.0376 0.0273 0.6957 0.070709/15/15 2.5426 0.6794 <0.02 0.0509 <0.02 0.7303 0.086401/19/16 1.8931 0.3763 <0.02 0.0432 0.0214 0.4409 0.050905/11/16 1.1700 0.5840 <0.05 0.0804 <0.01 0.6644 <0.0507/14/16 1.6974 0.7188 <0.02 0.0377 0.0222 0.7787 0.043611/15/16 1.8664 0.4989 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.4989 <0.0202/23/17 0.9069 0.1806 0.0272 0.0230 0.0339 0.2647 0.025906/21/17 1.9886 0.4647 <0.010 0.0780 0.0264 0.5692 0.044810/23/17 1.9077 0.4378 0.0382 0.0236 0.0585 0.5580 0.032602/13/18 0.1730 0.0370 <0.005 0.0010 <0.001 0.0380 <0.00505/17/18 1.2171 0.2470 <0.0100 0.0186 <0.0100 0.2656 0.0165

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2170 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-9

03/17/14 35 20-35 321.51

Page 29: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 4.86 319.32 - - 03/31/14 3.79 5.72 17107/14/14 13.90 310.28 - - 07/14/14 8.54 4.29 5112/11/14 20.30 303.88 - - 12/11/14 1.25 5.08 139.803/12/15 12.09 312.09 - - 03/12/15 0.17 5.29 -5109/15/15 18.58 305.60 - - 09/16/15 1.00 4.74 176301/13/16 5.04 319.14 - - 01/13/16 1.04 5.63 1905/11/16 9.00 315.18 - - 05/12/16 2.14 7.30 -6207/14/16 16.06 308.12 - 6.5 07/14/16 0.93 5.95 -3511/14/16 19.99 304.19 - - 11/14/16 0.96 4.93 -1802/23/17 6.50 317.68 - - 02/23/17 4.01 6.18 -22406/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/13/18 15.05 309.13 - - 02/13/18 0.82 5.29 -75.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-10

03/17/14 30 15-30 324.18

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 30: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

03/31/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00107/14/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00112/11/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/12/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/16/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00105/12/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/14/16 0.1004 0.0445 <0.001 0.0022 0.0011 0.0478 0.002211/14/16 <0.001 0.0014 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0014 <0.00102/23/17 <0.001 0.0010 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0010 <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/13/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.8420 0.2100 42.1000 29.5000 175.0000 0.8420Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-10

03/17/14 30 15-30 324.18

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 31: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 5.30 318.83 - - 03/31/14 1.75 5.09 17207/14/14 13.95 310.18 - - 07/14/14 8.38 2.63 12312/11/14 20.45 303.68 - - 12/11/14 1.67 5.99 -603/12/15 12.64 311.49 - - 03/12/15 0.07 5.79 -16309/15/15 18.58 305.55 - 5.0 09/16/15 1.63 5.13 -1301/13/16 5.48 318.65 - 11.8 01/14/16 1.09 5.40 2305/11/16 10.30 313.83 - 9.5 05/11/16 1.47 7.25 -17307/14/16 16.11 308.02 - 6.5 07/14/16 0.48 6.08 -10411/14/16 19.98 304.15 - 5.0 11/15/16 0.53 5.23 -4402/23/17 7.04 317.09 - 11.0 02/23/17 1.12 5.68 -14306/21/17 19.06 305.07 - 5.0 06/21/17 1.76 5.80 -196.010/23/17 18.95 305.18 - 5.0 10/23/17 2.85 5.56 -136.002/13/18 16.61 307.52 - 6.5 02/13/18 0.41 5.03 -97.005/17/18 14.81 309.32 - 7.0 05/17/18 1.58 5.64 -46.5

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-11

03/18/14 30 15-30 324.13

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 32: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

03/31/14 0.0028 0.0015 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0015 <0.00107/14/14 0.0479 0.1348 0.0010 0.0014 <0.001 0.1372 <0.00112/11/14 0.0100 0.0570 0.0022 0.0022 <0.003 0.0614 <0.00503/12/15 0.0485 0.1532 0.0019 0.0013 0.0042 0.1606 <0.00109/15/15 0.0177 0.0604 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0604 <0.00101/14/16 0.0021 0.0173 0.0013 <0.001 0.0038 0.0224 <0.00105/11/16 0.0114 0.1340 <0.005 0.0017 0.0044 0.1401 <0.00507/14/16 0.0087 0.0483 <0.001 <0.001 0.0011 0.0494 <0.00111/15/16 0.0064 0.0390 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0390 <0.00102/23/17 0.0023 0.0144 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0144 <0.00106/21/17 0.0065 0.0500 0.0025 0.0050 0.0085 0.0659 0.001610/23/17 0.0087 0.0211 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0211 <0.001002/13/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18 0.0152 0.0652 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0652 <0.0010

GRP SSTLs: 0.8590 0.2150 42.9000 30.1000 175.0000 0.8590Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-11

03/18/14 30 15-30 324.13

Page 33: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 22.63 300.59 - - 03/31/14 3.97 6.18 11307/14/14 21.30 301.92 - - 07/14/14 8.82 3.55 10612/11/14 26.17 297.05 - - 12/11/14 4.34 5.99 9903/12/15 27.00 296.22 - - 03/12/15 4.39 4.80 1109/15/15 26.81 296.41 - 1.5 09/15/15 5.02 4.59 20501/13/16 29.59 293.63 - - 01/13/16 NS NS NS05/11/16 21.72 301.50 - - 05/12/16 4.99 7.62 21107/14/16 22.45 300.77 - - 07/14/16 5.42 5.20 9711/14/16 25.10 298.12 - - 11/14/16 1.13 4.44 4802/23/17 24.51 298.71 - - 02/23/17 5.15 5.17 -2406/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/19/18 28.37 294.85 - - 02/19/18 4.63 5.71 112.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-12

03/18/14 30 15-30 323.22

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 34: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

03/31/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00107/14/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00112/11/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/12/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/15/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/1605/12/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00111/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/19/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.7410 0.1850 37.0000 25.9000 175.0000 0.7410Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-12

03/18/14 30 15-30 323.22

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 35: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 21.01 300.64 - - 04/01/14 3.34 5.38 15807/14/14 19.70 301.95 - - 07/14/14 6.90 5.01 2712/11/14 24.59 297.06 - - 12/11/14 2.76 4.95 16503/12/15 25.44 296.21 - - 03/12/15 2.07 4.50 48009/15/15 25.26 296.39 - - 09/16/15 2.50 4.46 21801/13/16 23.14 298.51 - - 01/13/16 2.96 4.68 7405/11/16 19.80 301.85 - - 05/12/16 2.55 7.10 8207/14/16 20.85 300.80 - 4.5 07/14/16 2.45 4.72 86.811/14/16 23.49 298.16 - - 11/14/16 1.00 4.12 9102/23/17 22.92 298.73 - - 02/23/17 4.90 4.61 2606/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/19/18 26.77 294.88 - - 02/19/18 3.61 4.53 200.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-13

03/18/14 30 15-30 321.65

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 36: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

04/01/14 0.0037 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00107/14/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00112/11/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/12/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/16/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00105/12/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0014 0.0014 <0.00111/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/19/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.8590 0.2150 42.9000 30.1000 175.0000 0.8590Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-13

03/18/14 30 15-30 321.65

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 37: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

05/16/14 3.96 317.75 - - 05/16/14 6.94 5.11 1007/14/14 13.45 308.26 - - 07/14/14 11.76 2.53 17812/11/14 17.71 304.00 - - 12/11/14 4.30 4.79 209.703/12/15 11.11 310.60 - - 03/13/15 4.23 8.01 22809/15/15 18.71 303.00 - - 09/16/15 7.05 4.10 24001/13/16 3.40 318.31 - - 01/13/16 5.45 5.20 10105/11/16 8.36 313.35 - - 05/16/16 4.51 4.56 10507/14/16 17.81 303.90 - - 07/15/16 6.86 5.09 8311/14/16 19.95 301.76 - - 11/14/16 1.05 4.20 10702/23/17 2.99 318.72 - - 02/23/17 6.90 5.03 15506/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/19/18 13.70 308.01 - - 02/19/18 6.21 4.80 33.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-14

05/12/14 28 13-28 321.71

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 38: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

05/16/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/14/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00112/11/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/13/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/16/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00105/16/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/15/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00111/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/19/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.6230 0.1560 31.1000 21.8000 175.0000 0.6230Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-14

05/12/14 28 13-28 321.71

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 39: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

05/16/14 5.25 318.32 - - 05/16/14 6.60 5.12 607/14/14 14.60 308.97 - - 07/14/14 11.68 3.05 16412/11/14 19.45 304.12 - - 12/11/14 4.87 4.61 19703/12/15 12.45 311.12 - - 03/13/15 7.21 4.04 27409/15/15 19.81 303.76 - - 09/16/15 6.15 4.01 23801/13/16 4.46 319.11 - - 01/13/16 4.13 4.11 9205/11/16 7.47 316.10 - 8.5 05/16/16 3.88 4.52 11007/14/16 16.59 306.98 - - 07/15/16 6.22 4.99 10911/14/16 21.16 302.41 - - 11/14/16 1.07 4.07 12002/23/17 6.90 316.67 - - 02/23/17 6.99 4.63 17406/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/19/18 14.35 309.22 - - 02/19/18 6.01 4.14 82.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-15

05/12/14 25 10-25 323.57

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 40: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

05/16/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/14/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00112/11/14 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 BDL <0.00503/13/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00109/16/15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/13/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00105/16/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/15/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00111/14/16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/23/17 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/19/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.7010 0.1750 35.0000 24.5000 175.0000 0.7010Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 MW-15

05/12/14 25 10-25 323.57

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 41: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

03/31/14 23.34 297.53 - - 04/01/14 4.30 10.30 -11007/14/14 22.00 298.87 - - 07/14/14 7.42 10.52 -5112/11/14 26.80 294.07 - - 12/11/14 1.64 11.38 23.603/12/15 26.71 294.16 - - 03/13/15 1.00 11.03 -12709/15/15 27.04 293.83 - 3.8 09/15/15 3.07 10.02 -13701/13/16 27.31 293.56 - 6.0 01/19/16 6.18 7.10 -11605/11/16 20.90 299.97 - 12.0 05/12/16 5.09 7.04 8107/14/16 23.61 297.26 - 6.5 07/15/16 4.08 10.79 -14511/14/16 27.92 292.95 - 8.0 11/15/16 0.43 7.37 -5602/23/17 23.34 297.53 - 10.0 02/24/17 5.23 9.39 -6506/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/19/18 28.54 292.33 - 8.0 02/19/18 5.57 8.24 -0.8

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 VW-1

03/26/14 55 50-55 320.87

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 42: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

04/01/14 0.1011 0.0277 0.0030 0.0080 0.0154 0.0541 0.002607/14/14 1.2017 1.7960 0.1327 0.4456 1.3093 3.6836 0.124012/11/14 0.7700 0.7800 0.0460 0.1700 0.5000 1.4960 <0.02503/13/15 0.4142 0.0340 <0.001 0.0016 0.0135 0.0491 <0.00109/15/15 0.1173 0.0100 <0.001 <0.001 0.0064 0.0164 <0.00101/19/16 0.0014 0.0020 <0.001 <0.001 0.0069 0.0089 <0.00105/12/16 0.0230 0.0011 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 0.0011 <0.00507/15/16 0.0130 0.0016 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0016 <0.00111/15/16 0.0163 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/24/17 <0.001 <0.001 0.0015 <0.001 0.0013 0.0028 <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/19/18 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2170 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 VW-1

03/26/14 55 50-55 320.87

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 43: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

12/11/14 28.39 293.11 - - 12/11/14 1.36 10.33 26.803/12/15 28.05 293.45 - - 03/13/15 2.32 8.37 7209/15/15 28.31 293.19 - 20.0 09/16/15 1.70 5.64 11701/13/16 28.54 292.96 - 7.0 01/19/16 4.16 7.32 -9805/11/16 22.56 298.94 - 13.0 05/16/16 1.49 11.30 -12707/14/16 24.65 296.85 - 12.0 07/15/16 3.20 10.75 -17011/14/16 27.54 293.96 - 14.0 11/15/16 0.76 7.61 -7002/23/17 23.70 297.80 - 25.0 02/24/17 0.86 11.42 -16006/21/17 06/21/1710/23/17 10/23/1702/19/18 29.19 292.31 - 14.0 02/19/18 2.87 10.34 -104.0

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 VW-2

11/19/14 76 70-75 321.50

NOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLEDNOT MEASURED NOT SAMPLED

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 44: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 2

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

12/11/14 0.0054 0.0027 <0.001 <0.001 <0.003 0.0027 <0.00503/13/15 0.0330 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00104/06/15 0.0400 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 BDL <0.00509/15/15 0.0565 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00101/19/16 0.0719 0.0040 0.0017 0.0012 0.0098 0.0167 <0.00105/16/16 0.0722 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00507/15/16 0.0655 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00111/15/16 0.0285 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00102/24/17 0.0111 <0.001 0.0015 <0.001 0.0014 0.0029 <0.00106/21/1710/23/1702/19/18 0.0010 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 BDL <0.00505/17/18

GRP SSTLs: 0.8660 0.2170 43.3000 30.3000 175.0000 0.8660Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

NOT SAMPLED

NOT SAMPLEDNOT SAMPLED

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 VW-2

11/19/14 76 70-75 321.50

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Page 45: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 4

DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION(FT BTOC) (FT ABOVE MSL)

09/24/15 27.41 293.75 - 14 09/24/15 3.45 6.28 11701/13/16 23.62 297.54 - 23 01/19/16 1.87 7.17 -11705/11/16 20.40 300.76 - 28.5 05/12/16 2.66 6.98 9907/14/16 25.41 295.75 - 19 07/15/16 0.49 5.54 -1911/14/16 25.93 295.23 - 11 11/15/16 0.44 4.50 1502/23/17 23.85 297.31 - 14 02/24/17 1.75 5.00 -12306/21/17 30.90 290.26 - 8.0 06/21/17 1.88 5.35 -115.010/23/17 28.35 292.81 - 13.0 10/23/17 2.31 5.31 -118.002/19/18 28.63 292.53 - 8.0 02/19/18 1.26 5.35 -108.005/17/18 27.65 293.51 - 3.5 05/17/18 0.95 5.38 -55.8

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 RW-1

09/22/15 35 15-35 321.16

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

POTENTIOMETRIC ELEVATION SUMMARY INTRINSIC GROUNDWATER DATA SUMMARY

MEASUREMENT DATE

FREE PRODUCT THICKNESS (FT)

PCW GALLONS CONTAINERIZED SAMPLE DATE

DISSOLVED OXYGEN (mg/L) pH

REDOX POTENTIAL (mV)

Page 46: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: IIDATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): 4

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

09/24/15 1.7149 2.0345 0.3260 0.6447 4.3894 7.3946 0.330301/19/16 1.3337 0.8109 0.0806 0.1261 1.4593 2.4769 0.073805/12/16 0.2260 0.2330 0.0144 0.1560 0.2790 0.6824 0.070307/15/16 0.7665 0.8994 0.0216 0.0963 0.3643 1.3816 0.090811/15/16 0.9871 0.5148 <0.02 0.0396 0.0364 0.5908 0.021702/24/17 0.8573 0.7387 0.0348 0.2088 0.5714 1.5536 0.056806/21/17 0.9379 0.1799 <0.010 0.0133 0.0310 0.2243 0.012010/23/17 1.1612 0.7361 0.0218 0.1581 0.2429 1.1588 0.087502/19/18 0.8240 0.4590 <0.05 0.0940 0.1080 0.6610 <0.0505/18/18 0.7685 0.2005 <0.0100 <0.0100 0.0147 0.2152 0.0115

ISLs 0.0200 0.0050 1.0000 0.7000 10.0000 0.0200Inhalation SSTLs: 7180.0 1.5800 150.00 169.00 126.00 14.200

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 RW-1

09/22/15 35 15-35 321.16

Page 47: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE NAME: UST NUMBER: 13-08-03 WELL ID:

INSTALLATION WELL DEPTH SCREEN CASING ELEV WELL TYPE: -DATE: (FT BTOC): INTERVAL (FT): (FT ABOVE MSL): DIAMETER (IN): -

SAMPLE DATE MTBE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES TOTAL BTEX NAPHTHALENE

09/24/15 1.7149 2.0345 0.3260 0.6447 4.3894 7.3946 0.3303

Notes: BTOC (Below Top of Casing); MSL (Mean Sea Level); BDL (Below Detection Limit); CA (Corrective Action)

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY (mg/L)

Monitoring Point Data Summary TableCitgo #115 Carbon Effluent

- - - -

Page 48: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

FIGURES

APPENDIX B

Page 49: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, Source: Esri,DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA,USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

0 2,000 4,000Feet

Site

§Site Location USGS Topographic Map

Citgo Food Mart #1152154 Denton Road

Dothan, Houston County, ALwww.cdge.com

Page 50: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

PL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

PLPL

VA

C

MW-1

MW-2

Pad

Tank

Concrete

Product Lines

Store

Canopy

Storage

Building

Former

Car Wash

Asphalt

Vent Lines

Denton R

oad

Access Road to Denton Road Mini Storage

Sign

Grass

Grass

Grass

MW-6

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-7

MW-8

MW-9

MW-11

MW-10

MW-12

MW-13

VW-1

MW-14

MW-15

VW-2

RW-1

BE

BE

BE

BE

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

WM

OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE

OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEP

P

MB

www.cdge.com

Approximate Scale in Feet

0

Site Map with Utility and Well Locations

Citgo Food Mart #1152154 Denton Road

Dothan, Houston County, AL

30 60

LEGEND

Type II Monitoring WellType III Monitoring WellRecovery WellProperty LineOverhead Electric CableBuried Electric CableWater Line

PL

OE

BE

WM

Page 51: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

VA

C

MW-1

MW-2

Pad

Tank

Concrete

Product Lines

Canopy

Storage

Building

Former

Car Wash

Asphalt

Vent Lines

Denton R

oad

Access Road to Denton Road Mini Storage

Sign

Grass

Grass

Grass

MW-6

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-7

MW-8

MW-9

MW-11

MW-10

MW-12

MW-13

VW-1

MW-14

MW-15

VW-2

RW-1

MB

www.cdge.com

Approximate Scale in Feet

0

Soil Analytical Map

Citgo Food Mart #1152154 Denton Road

Dothan, Houston County, AL

30 60

LEGEND

Type II Monitoring WellType III Monitoring WellRecovery Well

Depth (feet)Benzene Concentration (mg/Kg)BTEX Concentration (mg/Kg)MTBE Concentration (mg/Kg)Naphthalene Concentration (mg/Kg)

18<0.0020.008

<0.002<0.010

24<0.0020.005

<0.002<0.010

26<0.006<0.030<0.006

--

14<0.005<0.025<0.005

--

2<0.0020.008

<0.002<0.010

8<0.0020.005

<0.002<0.010

16<0.0020.025

<0.002<0.010

18<0.0020.009

<0.002<0.010

18<0.0099<0.079

<0.0099<0.0495

240.03550.1330.0151<0.050

10<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

12<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

16<0.034<0.0340.972

<0.034

18<0.033<0.0330.587

<0.033

10<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

12<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

12<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

14<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

14<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

18<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

10<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

14<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

14<0.0060.043

<0.0060.0198

180.0270.1020.093

0.0298

12<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

14<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.006

4<0.002<0.002<0.0020.0147

14<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.001

8<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.010

12<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.010

50<0.002<0.010.009<0.01

52<0.002<0.010.005<0.01

62<0.002<0.01

<0.002<0.01

66<0.002<0.01

<0.002<0.01

Page 52: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Lithologic Cross-Section A-A'

Citgo Food Mart #1152154 Denton Road

Dothan, Houston County, ALwww.cdge.com

10

200

ApproximateScale in Feet

Legend

Screened Interval

Groundwater Level

Sand

Clayey Sand

Clay

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

MW-3A

MW-4MW-5

A'

59' 95'

SC

CL

SC

CL

SP

SC

SP

CL

SC

SP

SC

SP

SC

SP

SC

Water Table

Page 53: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

LEGEND

Type III Monitoring Well

Type II Monitoring Well

Recovery Well

Property Line

302.62

Potentiometric Contour

Potentiometric Elevation (MSL)

Groundwater Flow Direction

Not MeasuredNM

www.cdge.com

0 60

Approximate Scale in Feet

30

Dothan, Houston County, AL

2154 Denton Road

Citgo Food Mart #115

May 17, 2018

Potentiometric Surface Map

VAC

MW-1

MW-2

Pad

Tank

Concrete

Product Lines

Store

Canopy

Storage

Building

Former

Car Wash

Asphalt

Vent Lin

es

Dento

n R

oad

Access Road to Denton Road Mini Storage

Sign

Grass

Grass

MW-6

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-7

MW-8

MW-9

MW-11

MW-10

MW-12

MW-13

VW-1

MW-14

MW-15

VW-2

RW-1

MB

293.26

299.43

293.43

301.10

309.52

295

293.51

300

305

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NMNM

300

Page 54: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

LEGEND

Type III Monitoring Well

Type II Monitoring Well

Recovery Well

Property Line

<0.001/<0.001

<0.001/BDL

Benzene Contour

BDL Below Detection Limit

MTBE/Naphthalene Conc. (mg/L)

Benzene/BTEX Conc. (mg/L)

3.075/0.653

2.350/6.319

0.769/0.012

0.201/0.215

NS Not Sampled

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

www.cdge.com

0 60

Approximate Scale in Feet

30

Dothan, Houston County, AL

2154 Denton Road

Citgo Food Mart #115

May 17, 2018

Groundwater Analytical and Benzene Contour Map

VAC

MW-1

MW-2

Pad

Tank

Concrete

Product Lines

Store

Canopy

Storage

Building

Former

Car Wash

Asphalt

Vent Lin

es

Dento

n R

oad

Access Road to Denton Road Mini Storage

Sign

Grass

Grass

MW-6

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-7

MW-8

MW-9

MW-11

MW-10

MW-12

MW-13

VW-1

MW-14

MW-15

VW-2

RW-1

MB

0.1

0.01

0.097/0.464

2.570/23.386

0.059/0.085

0.188/0.350

1.217/0.017

0.247/0.266

0.015/<0.001

0.065/0.065

0.01

Page 55: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

APPROVED ARBCA SSTLs

APPENDIX C

Page 56: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 57: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 58: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 59: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 60: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 61: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 62: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 63: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure
Page 64: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

QUALITY ASSURANCE /QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

APPENDIX D

Page 65: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

QA/QC MONITORING/SAMPLING PLAN FIELD ACTIVITIES

Groundwater Monitoring/Sampling Activity Protocols

Groundwater monitoring/sampling includes the following associated activities:

1) Measurement of free product if present;

2) Measurement of static water level;

3) Calculation of standing water volume (in well);

4) Collection of samples; and

5) Decontamination of equipment

Groundwater sampling parameters are recorded in the field on a monitoring well

sampling record form. The details for each of the above referenced

monitoring/sampling activities are described in the following sections.

Calculation of Standing Water Volume

The standing water volume in a monitoring well is calculated using the equation:

v = 3.14 x r2 x l (where v = well volume, r = well radius, and l = length of the column of

water in the well).

The column of water in the well can be calculated using the equation:

l = w – d (where w = distance from the top of casing to the bottom of the well and d =

distance from the top of casing to the top of the water).

Well Evacuation

Well evacuation is initiated after the static water level is measured and the standing

water volume has been calculated. Well evacuation is conducted by either using a new

disposable (single-use) bailer, a well-dedicated PVC bailer, or a surface mounted

pneumatic operated diaphragm pump (a diaphragm pump is only used in deep wells

Page 66: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

(greater than 25 feet) or in wells that yield such large volumes that hand-bailing is not

practical).

Well evacuation with a bailer is performed by attaching a new nylon line to the bailer,

and then lowering the bailer in to the well until the bailer is submerged. The bailer is

then retrieved from the well in such a manner that the bailer and nylon line do not

contact the ground or surrounding vegetation (to prevent contaminating the bailer or

line). The water removed from the well is poured into a graduated bucket so that the

amount of water removed can be determined. This procedure is repeated until three

well volumes of water are removed, or until the well is purged dry. For wells that

recharge very slowly, the purge water is limited to one well volume. The volume of

groundwater purged from each well will be recorded.

Well evacuation with a diaphragm pump is conducted by lowering disposable tubing

(hose) into the well, to sufficient depth. For deeper wells, a PVC pipe, equipped with a

foot valve (to stage-lift the water out of the well) will be employed. The piping will be

dedicated to each well to prevent cross-contamination. Pumping will be performed

until at least three well volumes are recovered (purge volume will be recorded).

Petroleum contaminated water (PCW) purged from wells in conjunction with

groundwater monitoring/sampling activities will be containerized in a 210 gallon tank

and transported to the CDG Dothan storage facility. PCW will be removed periodically

from the storage facility to an appropriate disposal/treatment/recycling facility

approved by the ADEM. Records will be maintained as to the volume of PCW

accumulated at the site. Prior to disposal, samples will be collected and analyzed as

required by the ADEM and the disposal/treatment/recycling facility.

Page 67: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Groundwater Sample Collection

Groundwater samples are collected from monitoring wells not containing free-phase

hydrocarbons unless otherwise directed by the ADEM. Groundwater sampling is

performed using a new disposable bailer for each sampled well. The disposable bailers

are purchased in individually wrapped packages, and are not opened until ready to use.

Once opened, the bailers are attached to a length of new nylon string. The bailer and

string are not allowed to touch the ground or vegetation, and are disposed of after each

well. Sampling is accomplished by slowly lowering the bailer into the well to a depth

where the bailer is almost completely submerged. The bailer is then slowly retrieved

from the well to minimize agitation of the sample. Once collected, the water sample is

immediately transferred (poured slowly to minimize agitation and formation of air

bubbles) into the designated sample containers.

Groundwater samples collected for BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene analysis (volatile organics)

are poured very slowly down the inside of the sample vial to avoid aeration. The sample

vials, consisting of 40 ml glass with a Teflon septum cap, are provided directly from the

CDG analytical laboratory. The groundwater sample is added to the vial until a convex

meniscus is formed across the top of the vial. The Teflon septum cap is placed on the

vial and the vial is upended to check for trapped air bubbles. If bubbles are present, the

sample container is opened, and topped off again until an air-free sample is obtained. If

the vial cannot be closed “air-free” after three tries, it is discarded. Two samples are

collected for each BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene (volatile) analysis. The preservation

employed for BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene (volatile) analysis will include either of the

following (depending on holding time constraints):

- Cool collected sample to 4oC and maintain (7-day holding time), or

- Add 4 drops concentrated HCl to sample vial (typically the acid is pre-added by the

laboratory to the sample vial) and then cool sample to 4oC and maintain (14-day

holding time).

Page 68: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Immediately following collection of each groundwater sample, the sample is labeled,

placed in bubble pack (to prevent the glass vial from breaking during shipping), and

stored in an ice chest with sufficient ice. Each sample label includes the site location,

sample identification number, name of collector, date/time of collection, and

parameter(s) requested.

Following collection of all samples, the ice chest will be sealed and transported to the

laboratory following appropriate chain of custody protocols (refer to description of

Chain of Custody protocols provided below).

Decontamination of Groundwater Sampling Equipment

All equipment used for groundwater sampling is either well-dedicated or is used only

once and disposed of. As a result, cleaning/decontamination of sampling equipment is

minimal.

QA/QC PROCEDURES DISCUSSION

Chain of Custody

Sample custody begins with the CDG laboratory when sample kits are prepared and

shipped for field personnel use at a specified project location. Responsibility for sample

container materials and preparation lies with the CDG laboratory. Upon receipt of the

kits, CDG field personnel complete an inventory of the contents to confirm that the

containers, etc. are adequate for the number of wells and specified analytes. Sample

bottles may be pre-labeled and contain the proper preservative. The individual sample

vials and/or other sample containers are not opened until used in the field. CDG will

secure the sample kits inside the office until the specific sampling project is to be

performed.

Page 69: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

The samples remain in the custody of the CDG field personnel representative until

delivered to the CDG laboratory or dispatched via common carrier for shipment to the

laboratory. In cases where samples leave the direct control of CDG personnel, such as

shipment to a laboratory by a common carrier (FedEx, UPS, etc.), a seal will be provided

on the shipping container or individual sample bottles to ensure that the samples have

not been opened or otherwise disturbed during transportation.

To establish and maintain the documentation necessary to trace sample possession

from the time of collection, a chain of custody record will be completed and will

accompany every sample. The record contains the following types of information:

- Sample number

- Signature of collector

- Date and time of collection

- Sample type (soil, groundwater, air, etc.)

- Identification of well

- Number of containers

- Parameters requested for analysis

- Required detection limit

- Signature of person(s) involved in the chain of possession.

Field QA/QC Program

Various types of field blanks are collected to verify that the sample collection and

handling process has not affected the quality or integrity of the samples.

1) Trip Blanks – A trip blank is a field blank that is transported from the laboratory

to the sampling site, handled in the same manner as other samples, and then

returned to the laboratory for analysis in determining QA/QC of sample handling

procedures. The trip blank is prepared in the laboratory with distilled/organic

Page 70: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

free water and is utilized at a frequency of 1 trip blank for each cooler (or other

shipping container) used to transport samples from the laboratory to the field

and back to the laboratory.

2) Duplicate Sample – Duplicate samples are collected simultaneously from the

same source, under identical conditions, into separate sample containers. These

samples provide a check on the sampling techniques as well as laboratory

equipment. Duplicate samples are only collected on groundwater samples at a

frequency of one sample per sampling event.

The results of the analysis of the blanks will not be used to correct the groundwater

data. If contaminants are found in the blanks, an attempt to identify the source of

contamination will be initiated and corrective action, including re-sampling if necessary,

will be evaluated.

After completing a sampling program, the field data package (field logs, calibration

records, chain of custody forms, etc.) will be reviewed for completeness and accuracy.

Some of the items considered in the Field Data Package Validation Procedure include

but are not limited to the following:

- A completeness review of field data contained on water and soil sampling logs;

- A verification that sampler blanks were properly prepared, identified, and analyzed;

- A check on field analyses for equipment calibration and condition; and

- A review of chain of custody forms for proper completion, signatures of field

personnel and the laboratory sample custodian, and dates.

Laboratory QA/QC Program

The selection of a contract laboratory can be directed either by the client or by CDG. In

either case, the selection of the laboratory is typically based upon several facts

Page 71: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

including cost, laboratory certification, quality of data and reporting, and turn around

time. The most critical factor in the selection of an analytical laboratory by CDG is the

quality of data and reporting provided by the laboratory. Typically, the results of

analytical laboratory testing dictate the activities conducted at a site. The activities

conducted when selecting a laboratory include discussions with current and past

customers, discussions with regulatory agencies, and review of laboratory QA/QC

practices.

The normal turn around for samples will be two weeks for most samples. Prior to

contracting a laboratory to conduct analysis, an estimate of the turn around time is

obtained. If the expected turn around is in excess of three weeks then a backup

laboratory is contacted to determine their availability. A decision of which laboratory

to use in a particular instance is made on a case-by-case basis.

Once an analytical report is received by CDG, validation of the analytical data package

will be performed. The Analytical Data Package Validation procedure will include but is

not limited to the following:

- A comparison of the Data Package to the reporting level requirements designed for

the project, to ensure completeness;

- A comparison of sampling dates, sample extraction dates, and analysis dates to

determine if samples were extracted and/or analyzed within the proper holding

times’ as failure in this area may render the data unusable;

- A review of analytical methods and required detection limits to verify that they

agree with set standards; as failure in this area may render the data unusable;

- A review of sample blanks to evaluate possible sources of contamination. The

preparation techniques and frequencies, and the analytical results (if appropriate)

will be considered; and

Page 72: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

- A review of blanks (trip blanks, reagent blanks, method blanks, and extraction

blanks) to assure that they are contamination free at the lowest possible detection

limit. All blank contaminants must be explained or the data applicable to those

blanks will be labeled suspect and may only be sufficient for qualitative purposes.

- A review of detection limits, to ensure sample results are accurate to below the

levels specified as ADEM Site Specific Target Levels.

- A review of data “qualifiers” reported by the laboratory for significance to the

results.

Page 73: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN

APPENDIX E

Page 74: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Site Health and Safety Plan

Citgo Food Mart #115 Facility ID# 10037-069-012234

UST No. 13-08-03

Prepared For:

A. W. Herndon Oil Company, Inc. P.O. Box 640

Abbeville, Henry Co., AL

Prepared By:

CDG Engineers & Associates, Inc. 3 Riverchase Ridge

Hoover, Alabama 35244

Page 75: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Table of Contents Page No. 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 1

3.0 Key Personnel and Responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 1

4.0 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Installation Activities ......................................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Operation & Maintenance Activities ................................................................................................. 2

5.0 Chemical Hazards ............................................................................................................................................ 3

5.1 Gasoline............................................................................................................................................. 3 5.2 Hazard Identification ......................................................................................................................... 3 5.3 Hazard Prevention............................................................................................................................. 4 5.4 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures ................................................................................................. 4

6.0 Equipment/Operational Hazards..................................................................................................................... 5

6.1 Hazard Identification ......................................................................................................................... 5 6.2 Hazard Prevention............................................................................................................................. 6

6.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedure ................................................................................................... 7

7.0 Temperature Hazards ...................................................................................................................................... 7 7.1 Heat ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 7.1.1 Hazard Identification ...................................................................................................................... 7 7.1.1.1 Heat Fatigue ............................................................................................................................. 8

7.1.1.2 Heat Rash. ................................................................................................................................ 8 7.1.1.3 Heat Collapse ........................................................................................................................... 8 7.1.1.4 Heat Cramps ............................................................................................................................ 8 7.1.1.5 Heat Exhaustion ....................................................................................................................... 8 7.1.1.6 Heat Stroke .............................................................................................................................. 9 7.1.2 Hazard Prevention .......................................................................................................................... 9 7.1.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures............................................................................................. 10

8.0 Explosion/Electrocution Hazards .................................................................................................................. 10 8.1 Explosion ............................................................................................................................................ 11 8.1.1 Hazard Identification .................................................................................................................... 11 8.1.2 Hazard Prevention ........................................................................................................................ 11 8.2 Electrocution ......................................................................................................................................... 12 8.2.1 Hazard Identification .................................................................................................................... 12 8.2.2 Hazard Prevention ........................................................................................................................ 12 8.2.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures............................................................................................. 12

9.0 Miscellaneous Hazards .................................................................................................................................. 13 9.1 Hazard Identification .......................................................................................................................... 13 9.2 Hazard Prevention ............................................................................................................................. 13 9.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures .................................................................................................. 14

Page 76: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

10.0 Additional Precautions .................................................................................................................................. 14 10.1 Personal Protective Equipment........................................................................................................ 14 10.2 Signs, Signals, and Barricades .......................................................................................................... 15 10.3 Fire Protection and Prevention ........................................................................................................ 15 10.4 Storage and Decontamination ......................................................................................................... 16

11.0 Emergency Contingency Plan ........................................................................................................................ 16 11.1 Notification/Reporting Procedures .................................................................................................. 16 11.2 Hazardous Substance Release .......................................................................................................... 17 11.3 Personnel Injury ............................................................................................................................... 17 11.4 Evacuation Plan ................................................................................................................................ 17 11.5 Spill Prevention and Response ......................................................................................................... 17 11.6 Emergency Communication ............................................................................................................. 17 11.7 Contingency Contacts ...................................................................................................................... 18 11.8 Medical Facility ................................................................................................................................ 19

Page 77: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

4

1.0 Introduction This Health and Safety Plan (HASP) has been prepared specifically for corrective action activities to be conducted

by CDG Engineers & Associates, Inc. (CDG) for the Citgo Food Mart #115 facility located in Dothan, Houston County,

Alabama. These activities include all fieldwork necessary to conduct soil and groundwater remediation of

petroleum hydrocarbons at the site.

2.0 Purpose This HASP describes the preventative measures, person protection, and safety procedures to be followed by CDG

personnel and subcontractors during all field activities. The HASP has been prepared in accordance with and

meets the requirements of the Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) General Safety Standards for

industry under 29 CFR 1910 and construction under 29 CFR 1926, the joint NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA, Occupational

Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities, dated October 1985, and NFPA Safety

Guidelines. Should any unexpected conditions arise, the HASP will be amended to accommodate site specific

conditions.

3.0 Key Personnel and Responsibilities All CDG personnel have received an initial 40-hour HAZWOPER certification, which is updated annually through an

8-hour refresher course. This training course meets the requirements of the OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 standards.

CDG personnel assigned to the project include:

NAME TITLE RESPONSIBILITIES

David Dailey Professional Engineer/ Corporate

HSO

Overall management of entire project from beginning to completion. Responsible for preparation and implementation of the HASP and reporting of all hazard incidents to appropriate enforcement agencies. Coordinates and oversees all field activities.

Daniel Roe Project Manager / Site HSO

Performs all field activities and is responsible for recognizing site hazards and reporting hazard incidents to Corporate HSO.

Page 78: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

5

4.0 Scope of Work Work to be performed will include installation and excavation activities.

4.1 Installation Activities

Installation activities generally involve preparing the site for installation activities and also the construction of the

MPVE unit onsite. More specifically this will include:

• Preparing the site for work to be performed

• Saw-cutting concrete surface, excavating, and installing well vaults

• Installing polyvinyl chloride (PVC) extraction piping and subsurface utility lines

• Installing piping connections from extraction piping to wellhead

• Overseeing placing and leveling of remediation system

• Completing all piping connections from extraction and utility lines to remediation unit

• Completing all electrical connections

• Installing concrete block security fence

• Inspecting rotation on all electric motors

• Inspecting PVC piping, extraction lines, treatment system, and associated connections for leaks at start up

4.2 Operation and Maintenance Activities

Subsequent to the construction and installation of the MPVE unit, the unit must periodically undergo inspections

or maintenance. CDG field personnel will inspect the unit on a weekly basis, taking certain instrument readings

necessary to determine the progress of the remediation being performed at that particular site. Maintenance of

the unit is performed on an as needed basis. The following applies to operation and maintenance activities

associated with the MPVE unit:

• Inspecting proper working condition of telemetry system

• Lubricating motors

• Inspecting piping for leaks

• Inspecting belts on Liquid Ring Vacuum Pump (LRVP) system

• Periodic cleaning of equipment and components

• Periodic inspections of electrical connections

• Measuring induced vacuum in on site monitoring wells

• Removing silt and sludge buildup from knockout pot air stripper, filtration system and other system

components

Page 79: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

6

• Measuring air flow from MPVE unit

• Measuring liquid levels in wells

• Sampling effluent for discharge parameters

• Measuring volume of liquids removed and discharged

5.0 Chemical Hazards When conducting the aforementioned corrective action activities, the primary chemicals of concern are gasoline.

5.1 Gasoline and Diesel

Gasoline and diesel are substances to be potentially encountered in the soil and groundwater at the site. Gasoline

components include benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX). Diesel components may include

anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene,

benzo(k)fluoranthene, chrysene, fluoranthene, fluorene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene.

5.2 Hazard Identification

During the corrective action activities, many hazards or potential hazards may be encountered when dealing with

gasoline or diesel. This section serves as a guideline in recognizing hazards associated with these chemicals that

exist or may potentially arise during field activities. Recognition is the first step in eliminating exposure to these

hazards.

Occasionally methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) is encountered. MTBE has been used since 1979 as an oxygenate

to gasoline in order to decrease carbon monoxide production in cars, particularly older model cars; however, MTBE

has been determined to be a potential carcinogen. MTBE has low taste and odor thresholds, which can make a

water supply non-potable even at low concentrations.

Exposure to MTBE will only be seen through exposure to gasoline containing MTBE and the effects of gasoline

containing MTBE are relatively similar to gasoline not containing MTBE. The following are hazards associated with

exposure to gasoline:

• Contact may irritate or burn the skin and eyes and absorption through the skin may be poisonous

• Vapors may be poisonous if inhaled and are irritating to the respiratory tract

• Vapors are an explosion hazard and my travel to a source of ignition and produce flashback

• A gasoline fire may produce irritating and poisonous gases

• Gasoline and diesel are flammable/combustible materials that may be ignited by heat, sparks, or flames,

and a gasoline container may explode when exposed to heat or fire

Page 80: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

7

The primary hazard associated with exposure to gasoline is the inhalation of vapors. The Material Safety Data

Sheets (MSDS’s) are presented in Attachment A.

5.3 Hazard Prevention

Preventing exposure to chemical hazards generally requires the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Level

D equipment will provide the protection necessary to prevent exposure to these hazards. Level D equipment is

discussed further in Section 10.1, Personal Protective Equipment.

5.4 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures

Many of the constituents found in gasoline and diesel act as central nervous system (CNS) depressants. The

following table includes first aid measures for CNS depressants, which affect a person through inhalation

(breathing), dermal (skin), or ingestion (mouth) exposure. In addition, the eye can be very sensitive to exposure to

chemicals and is therefore included in the following table:

ROUTES OF EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS TREATMENT

Inhalation

Dizziness, nausea, lack of coordination, headache, irregular and rapid breathing, weakness, loss of consciousness, coma

Bring victim to fresh air. Rinse eyes or throat with plenty of water, if irritated. If symptoms are severe (victim vomits, is very dizzy or groggy, etc.), evacuate to hospital. Be prepared to administer CPR if certified. Monitor victim for at least 48 hours.

Dermal Irritation, rash, or burning Flush affected area with water for at least 15 minutes. Apply clean dressing and get medical attention.

Ingestion Dizziness, nausea with stomach, cramps, loss of consciousness, coma

Evacuate victim to hospital. Do not induce vomiting.

Eye Redness, irritation, pain, impaired vision

Flush with an abundant amount of water for at least 15 minutes. If severe, seek medical attention immediately.

6.0 Equipment/Operational Hazards The following sections will address the hazards, preventative measures, and first aid procedures associated with

the drill rig, backhoes, and other heavy equipment. The drill rig used during these field activities generally requires

the use of augers for probing. These augers are designed to rotate in a circular motion while being forced

downward through the soil. Field personnel are required to assemble and disassemble these parts. Contact with

Page 81: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

8

these rotating parts is one recognized hazard. In addition, the machinery also contains parts that become

increasingly heated during operation.

6.1 Hazard Identification

There are several hazardous associated with use of any type of drill rig and heavy machinery while performing

corrective action activities. Generally during these field operations, the general public may become fascinated with

the operation and approach the work area. All unauthorized personnel are required to remain 100 feet away from

the work area. The site HSO officer will be responsible for keeping all unauthorized personnel away from the work

area. The hazardous associated with the use of a drill rig or other heavy machinery is as follows:

• Gasoline vapors from nearby dispensers can potentially enter the diesel-operated engine thereby causing

fire/explosion hazards

• Rotating augers may catch onto gloves or clothing thereby pulling hands arms into the rotating machinery

• Drilling equipment may rupture hydraulic hoses thereby releasing hydraulic fluids

• Engine and exhaust system of an engine are extremely hot during and following operation

• Potential contact with overhead and underground utilities

• Open excavations/boreholes can be the source of trips and falls

• Digging machinery such as backhoes may puncture subsurface utilities

• Operators of heavy machinery may be unable to locate pedestrians near the operating equipment;

therefore, all field personnel are to remain with eye contact of the operator at all times during operation

6.2 Hazard Prevention

Hazards associated with heavy machinery can easily be avoided with additional planning. The key to avoiding

these hazards includes being familiar with the equipment and the process. In addition, being familiar with and

implementing the precautionary measures listed below may reduce or eliminate the risks of a hazardous situation.

• Wear hard hat when working near or around the machinery

• Wear safety glasses when performing maintenance to machinery or power tools

• Shut down the machine engine when repairing or adjusting equipment

• Prevent accidental starting of engine during maintenance procedures by removing or tagging ignition key

• Block wheels or lower leveling jacks and set hand brakes to prevent equipment form moving during

drilling procedures

• When possible, release all pressure on hydraulic systems, drilling fluid systems, , and air pressure systems

of heavy machinery prior to performing maintenance

• Know the location of the emergency shut-off switch for all equipment

• Avoid contact with engine or exhaust system of engine following its operation

Page 82: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

9

• Avoid using gasoline or other volatile/flammable liquids as a cleaning agent on or around heavy machinery

• Replace all caps, filler plugs, protective guards or panels, and high-pressure hose clamps, chains or cables

moved during maintenance prior to excavation

• Avoid wearing rings or jewelry during drilling or installation procedures

• Be aware of all overhead and underground utilities

• Avoid alcohol or other CNS depressants or stimulants prior to excavation

• Avoid contact with equipment parts during freezing weather. Freezing of moist skin to metal can occur

almost instantaneously

• Shut all field operations during an electrical storm

• Do not operate heavy equipment within 20 feet of overhead power lines

6.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedure

Hazards associated with heavy equipment were identified in Section 6.1. Unlike hazards associated with

temperature or chemicals, symptoms will not be apparent with these types of hazards. In addition, these hazards

will occur rapidly as opposed to over a period of time. Due to the size and composition of hydraulic vehicles,

exposure to these hazards will range from extremely serious to life-threatening; therefore, CDG requires that

exposed field personnel seek medical attention at the nearest medical facility and the Project Manager be notified

immediately. A site location map to the nearest hospital is presented in Attachment B.

7.0 Temperature Hazards Another hazard associated with corrective action activities involves working in extreme weather conditions.

Temperatures in the Southeast USA during the spring, summer, and occasionally the fall seasons can vary from

mild to extremely hot. During this season, extra precautions are necessary to prevent hazards associated with

elevated temperatures, which result in various forms of heat stress. In addition, the Southeast is known for its

rather mild winter condition; however, on occasion, the Southeast may experience freezing conditions; therefore,

precautions are also necessary to prevent hazards associated with these extreme temperatures.

7.1 Heat

As stated in OSHA’s regulatory guidelines for heat exposure operations involving high air temperatures, radiant

heat sources, high humidity, direct physical contact with hot objects, or strenuous physical activities have a high

potential for inducing heat stress. Additional factors to consider in the determination of heat stress on an

individual include age, weight, degree of physical fitness, degree of acclimatization, metabolism, use of alcohol or

Page 83: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

10

drugs, and a variety of medical conditions such as hypertension (high blood pressure). The following sections will

identify the hazards associated with heat stress, the measures needed in order to prevent exposure to these

hazards, and first aid procedures in the event exposure to these hazards should occur.

7.1.1 Hazard Identification

Heat stress is a major hazard, especially for workers wearing protective clothing. Depending on the ambient

conditions and the work being performed, heat stress can occur very rapidly- within as little as 15 minutes. The

key to preventing excessive heat stress is educating personnel on the hazards associated with working in heat and

the benefits of implementing proper controls and work practices. The hazards associated with heat stress range

from heat fatigue (mild discomfort) to heat stroke (extreme danger, which may result in death, and are discussed

in the following sections.

7.1.1.1 Heat Fatigue

Heat fatigue occurs due to a lack of acclimatization (adjusting one’s tolerance to work in elevated temperatures).

Acclimatization is a gradual process. This process should include all field personnel being permitted to work in

elevated temperatures in specified increments. On a daily basis, the maximum allowable work period should

gradually be increased until the worker is able to perform his/her duties more proficiently under these conditions.

The use of an acclimatization program is recommended in the regulatory guidelines established by OHSA.

7.1.1.2 Heat Rash

Heat rash (prickly heat) is the most common heat stress factor, and may result form continuous exposure to heat

or humid air where the skin remains wet due to lack of evaporation. Under these conditions, sweat ducts become

plugged, and a skin rash appears, generally in areas where clothing is restrictive. This uncomfortable rash can be

prevented by resting in a cool place during breaks and by implementing good daily personal hygiene.

7.1.1.3 Heat Collapse

Heat collapse is commonly referred to as “fainting.” Fainting generally occurs when the brain does not receive

enough oxygen. As a result of this condition, the exposed individual may lose consciousness. Heat collapse is rapid

and unpredictable; therefore, acclimatization is an important factor in preventing this condition.

7.1.1.4 Heat Cramps

Page 84: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

11

Heat cramps are muscular spasms, which usually occur in the abdomen or limbs due to loss of electrolytes

following profuse sweating. Cramps are caused by either too much or too little salt intake. During the sweating

process, salt exits the body; therefore, without the proper replenishment, the body experiences an electrolyte

imbalance thereby inducing heat cramps. Thirst cannot be relied upon as a guide to the need for water. When

working in hot environments, water must be replenished every 15 to 20 minutes.

7.1.1.5 Heat Exhaustion

Heat exhaustion is a result of overexertion in hot or warm weather. It is highly possible for an onsite worker to

experience heat exhaustion due to the use of worker-protective coveralls, boots, gloves, and respirator protection,

even when ambient temperatures are mild. Fainting may also occur with heat exhaustion. This can become an

extreme hazard if operating heavy machinery.

Caution: Individuals with heart problems or on a “low sodium” diet who work in these environments should

consult a physician and Corporate HSO prior to working in these conditions.

7.1.1.6 Heat Stroke

Heat stroke is the most severe form of heat stress. The body’s temperature control system is maintained through

sweat production. Perspiration is a cooling process for the body and keeps the body core temperature within a

stable range. During heat stroke, sweat production is inhibited and the body temperature begins to rapidly rise.

Brain damage and death may occur if body core temperature is extremely elevated and is not reduced.

7.1.2 Hazard Prevention

Hazards associated with temperature extremes can also be prevented with additional planning and preparation.

The hazards associated with temperature can range from heat fatigue to heat stroke as described previously in

Section 7.1.1 Measures to ensure the prevention of temperature hazards are as follows:

• Adhere to acclimatization process by exposing field personnel to progressively longer periods of time in

hot environments.

• Schedule work for early morning or evening during warm weather

• Work in shifts; limit exposure time of personnel and allow frequent breaks

• Have cool liquids at an Exclusion Zone border for exposed personnel to continuously replace body fluids.

As stated in the previous section, OSHA recommends that fluids, preferably water and/or a water-

electrolyte solution be replenished every 15 to 20 minutes.

• Avoid caffeine and alcoholic beverages both during work hours and 24 hours prior to performing field

activities

Page 85: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

12

The site HSO or designee should continually monitor personnel for signs of heat stress. If any signs of heat

disorders are apparent, all field personnel must immediately rest and replenish fluids until body core temperature

is lowered and remains stable.

7.1.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures

As discussed previously in Section 7.1.1, hazards associated with heat stress range from heat fatigue to heat stroke.

Taking precautionary measures to ensure that personnel are not exposed to extreme temperatures for long

periods of time can prevent these hazards. First aid measures for heat fatigue, heat rash, and heat collapse include

taking frequent breaks so that the body core temperature can cool down. The following table includes first aid

measures for signs of overexposure to heat.

Page 86: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

13

TEMPERATURE HAZARDS

SYMPTOMS TREATMENT

Heat Fatigue Impaired performance of skilled sensorimotor, mental or vigilance jobs

No known treatment. Victim should be placed under cooler conditions until body core temperature lowers.

Heat Rash Rash due to plugged sweat ducts, generally where clothing is restrictive

Keep dry towels or paper towels at the site to dry skin when excessive sweating occurs. Rash usually disappears when affected individual returns to cooler environment.

Heat Collapse Loss of consciousness

Attempt to awaken individual. Relocate victim to a cooler area until body core temperature lowers and replenish fluids. Victim should rest for a few days.

Heat Cramps Uncontrollable muscle spasms

Apply warm, moist heat and pressure to reduce pain. Give electrolyte drinks by mouth. Victim should intake additional potassium (Bananas are good potassium source).

Heat Exhaustion

Pale, clammy skin, profuse perspiration, weakness, headache, and nausea

Get victim into shade or cooler place. Immediately remove any protective clothing. Victim should drink plenty of fluids. Victim should lie down with feet raised. Fan and cool victim with wet compresses. If vomiting occurs, transport to hospital. Victim should rest for a few days.

Heat Stroke Pale, dry skin due to lack of perspiration, weakness, unconsciousness

Immediately take precautions to cool body core temperature by removing clothing and sponging body with cool water, or placing in tub of cool water until temperature is lowered sufficiently (102°F). Stop cooling and observe victim for 10 minutes. Once temperature remains lowered, dry person off. Use fans or air conditioning, if available. Do not give the victim stimulants. Transfer to medical facility. Under no condition is the victim to be left unattended unless authorized by a physician.

8.0 Explosion/Electrocution Hazards As stated previously in Section 4.1, extensive efforts are made in order to determine the location of subsurface

utilities prior to corrective action activities. Efforts are made to obtain the location of underground utilities

through the Line Locator Services, and utility companies are notified in advance to perform a site inspection and

utility marking; however, the potential for a subsurface utility to go unnoticed exists. Therefore, the hazards

associated with exposure to these utilities are identified and preventative measures and first aid procedures are

discussed further in the following sections.

Page 87: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

14

8.1 Explosion

Primarily when dealing with subsurface utilities, two potentially life-threatening hazards exist. The first hazard

identified in association with subsurface utilities during excavation activities are discussed further in the following

section.

8.1.1 Hazard Identification

The main hazard associated with puncturing a subsurface utility gas line is explosion. By releasing gas (usually

natural gas, which is generally methane gas or propane gas) into the atmosphere, explosive conditions are

favorable; therefore, ignition sources must be immediately eliminated in the event a gas release occurs. Due to the

flammability of gasoline, ignition sources will be minimized; however, the engines are needed during field

activities. Therefore, the only alternative to reducing the explosion hazard is to stop the release as soon as

possible. However, when dealing with gases under pressure, the volatilization process may occur at such a rapid

speed that an explosive situation is inevitable.

8.1.2 Hazard Prevention

Preventative measures are ensured prior to field activities. These measures generally encompass locating

subsurface utilities. In addition, CDG will request local utility companies to perform site inspections and mark all

subsurface utilities. In addition to this notification, if a particular subsurface utility is not identified and CDG

suspects the utility to exist, CDG will take additional precautionary measures to ensure the suspected utility does

not exist. These measures generally include locating utility meter boxes, etc. In addition, a field technician or

subcontractor will generally probe the ground with a small rod in order to possibly identify the existence of

subsurface utilities. This is conducted usually when machinery reaches 2-3 feet below the ground surface (ft-bgs).

8.2 Electrocution

8.2.1 Hazard Identification

The main hazard associated with puncturing a subsurface electrical line or coming into contact with an overhead

power line is electrocution. When dealing with electricity, all things are classified as either conductors or

insulators. Conductors allow electricity to pass through them while insulators prevent electricity to pass through.

Examples of conductors are metals, wood, and water, and examples of insulators are rubber and PVC. Humans are

also classified as conductors; therefore, contact with electrical sources can be fatal.

Because the heavy machinery is metal, which has been classified as one of the best sources of electrical

conduction, contact with exposed electrical lines will allow current to flow. The National Electrical Code (NEC) has

determined that 20 milliamps (mA) of current can be fatal. For comparison, a common household circuit breaker

may conduct 15, 20, or 30 amps of electrical current.

Page 88: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

15

8.2.2 Hazard Prevention

As stated previously in Section 8.1.2, preventative measures to locate subsurface and overhead electrical lines prior

to corrective action activities are required by CDG. CDG will notify local utility companies to provide a site

inspection and mark any existing subsurface electrical lines. In addition, CDG will contact the local power provider

to insulate overhead lines if necessary. When dealing with the electrical components of the dewatering system,

the following precautionary measures may prevent exposure to electrocution:

• Avoid contact with exposed connections/wiring and other related components

• If unfamiliar with the system, do not attempt contact with any component

• Call the Project Manager if unsure of any connections associated with the operations of the system.

8.2.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures

As discussed previously in Section 8.2.1, the hazard associated with puncturing subsurface electrical utilities and

contacting electrical components of dewatering system is electrocution. The primary route of exposure is contact.

The transmission of electricity is allowed because the metal equipment serves as a conductor for electrical current.

Symptoms and treatment for exposure to electrical current is presented in the following table:

Caution: NEVER attempt to dislodge or remove someone that is contacting a high voltage line Use an insulating

material (PVC) to release the victim from the electrocution source.

9.0 Miscellaneous Hazards The last hazard identified when performing corrective action activities has been classified as miscellaneous hazards

due to the variety of these hazards. These hazards generally are nothing more than nuisances and with additional

planning should be entirely avoidable; however, there are instances in which exposure to these hazards will occur.

Therefore, these hazards are identified and preventative measures and first aid procedures are discussed in further

detail in the following sections.

9.1 Hazard Identification

Occasionally, exposure to common nuisances may potentially result in a life-threatening situation. For example, a

wasp or bee sting for some individuals only causes irritation or localized soreness; however, to others with little

tolerance for wasp or bee venom, an allergic reaction can result which could potentially lead to death if not treated

immediately. Therefore, allergic reactions to these insects have been identified as a potential hazard. In addition

to the insects, contact with black widow spiders (red hourglass), brown recluse spiders (violin shape on back), and

snakes are also potential hazard.

9.2 Hazard Prevention

Page 89: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

16

Prevention, with regards to miscellaneous hazards, is more difficult to plan ahead. Generally, prior to conducting

corrective action activities, the primary location for the activities has been established; therefore, barricades such

as cones and company vehicles can be placed around the work area to prevent exposure to incoming and ongoing

vehicles. However, the limitation to using cones is that they are often small and unnoticeable to drivers once

inside the vehicles; therefore, the best prevention with regards to this miscellaneous hazard is to constantly be

aware of your surroundings. This preventative measure can also be applied to exposure to insects, snakes, and

spiders. Be aware of your surrounding when working around dark, secluded areas such as cracks and crevices,

where snakes, spiders, and mice like to hide.

9.3 Symptoms and First Aid Procedures

If an employee or subcontractor shows any signs of an allergic reaction (anaphylactic shock, hives, or difficulty

breathing) to a sting or bite, immediately seek medical attention at the nearest hospital. In the event that an

operating vehicle strikes a person, seek medical attention immediately. In the meantime, a first aid kit and eye

wash bottle will be provided by CDG and should be kept in all company vehicles. If field personnel are aware of

their allergic reactions to insect bites, CDG requires that medication be kept on hand during field activities and at

least one other field technician be made aware of the medication in the event of an allergic reaction should occur.

10.0 Additional Precautions Additional precautions have been implemented in order to ensure overall safety for all field personnel. The safety

protocols listed in this segment are to be considered the minimum requirements to be met by all field personnel

engaging in corrective action activities.

10.1 Personal Protective Equipment

PPE is the most effective measure to prevent exposure to chemical hazards. There are four levels of PPE protection

ranging from Level A to Level D equipment. Level A protection serves as the most conservative protective

equipment, and Level D protection serves as the least conservative protective equipment. These levels are

described further in the following table:

Page 90: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

17

LEVELS OF PPE PROTECTION

PPE REQUIREMENTS

Level A Worn when the highest level of respiratory, skin, and eye protection is necessary.

Level B Worn when the highest level of respiratory protection is needed, but a lesser level of skin protection is necessary.

Level C Worn when the criteria for using air-purifying respirators are met, and a lesser level of skin protection is necessary.

Level D Refers to work conducted without respiratory protection. This level should be used only when the atmosphere contains no know or suspected airborne chemical or radiological contaminants and oxygen concentrations are between 19.5 % and 23.0%

Level D protective clothing, as indicated below, shall be considered the minimum requirements for installation and

excavation operations:

• Hard hat

• Coveralls*

• Non permeable gloves

• Steel-toe, non-permeable boots

• Hearing protection*

• Safety goggles (chemical)*

*These items area mandatory on an “as needed” basis. Generally, normal site conditions do not warrant the use of

this equipment; however, under certain conditions where large amounts of free product are encountered, the

issue of coveralls and safety goggles may be warranted. Safety goggles and hearing protection are mandatory

when near the drill rig to reduce stress on the ear and also prevent objects from the soil or drill rig from lodging in

the eye.

Equipment may be upgraded to Level C depending on the site conditions and/or monitoring results. Level C

protection, in addition to Level D protection, includes the following:

• Rubber/chemical resistant outer gloves

• Face-shield if splash hazards exists

• Outer disposable booties

• Half-mask respirator

10.2 Signs, Signals, and Barricades

As stated previously in Section 9.1, corrective action activities are generally conducted at retail gasoline facilities

and convenience stores, and are therefore, high traffic areas. All CDG field personnel must be aware of his/her

surroundings at all times. In addition, the items listed below will be provided to secure the area in order to protect

all field personnel as well as the general public.

Page 91: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

18

• Utilize barricades to protect workers, pedestrians and vehicles from work activities

• Post area for “NO SMOKING”

• Utilize cones to protect workers from incoming and ongoing vehicles

10.3 Fire Protection and Prevention

As stated previously in Section 5.1, gasoline is a highly flammable substance. CDG requires that the work area be

posted with “NO SMOKING” signs in an attempt to prevent fires from occurring; however, as a secondary

precaution CDG plans to implement the following:

• Maintain a 20 lb. ABC Dry Chemical fire extinguisher on site at all times

• Eliminate ALL ignition sources in the vicinity of any releases

• The contractor will clean up all small spills using absorbent materials or by pumping

10.4 Storage and Decontamination

During the corrective action activities, impacted soils will be encountered. Groundwater will be treated and

pumped to an NPDES outfall. Contaminated soil will be temporarily stored until transported for disposal.

Decontamination procedures will be implemented should chemical exposure occur. The procedures are detailed

below:

• Avoid contact with liquid gasoline or diesel

• Place contaminated soil on visqueen and cover once removed from the excavation

• Change any product contaminated soil immediately

• Wash any contaminated skin surfaces immediately with soap and water

Caution: All personnel are required to wash hands at the completion of work, before and after restroom use and

before eating in order to prevent dermal contact with or ingestion of contaminants encountered during field

activities.

11.0 Emergency Contingency Plan If an incident occurs that requires declaring an emergency, all personnel will assemble at a designated emergency

meeting location for further instruction. Arrangement for decontamination, evacuation and/or transport will be

made at that time. The client and appropriate CDG personnel will be notified of the incident as soon as possible.

11.1 Notification/Reporting Procedures

In the event of an emergency, CDG Project Manager will be notified as soon as possible regarding the nature of the

Page 92: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

19

incident and emergency service contact will be notified as needed (see Section 11.7, Contingency Contacts). It is

the responsibility of the Site HSO to report all incidents to the CDG Corporate HSO so that the required reporting

procedures may be implemented.

11.2 Hazardous Substance Release

In the event that potentially hazardous substances migrate from the work zone and potentially endanger

unprotected personnel or the community all on site activities will cease until the release is brought under control.

CDG will immediately notify the proper authorities so that they may be able to ensure that public health and safety

is maintained throughout this process event to the extent of evacuation if necessary.

11.3 Personnel Injury

In the event of an injury, all personnel will assemble at the designated emergency meeting location. The Site HSO,

prior to the beginning of filed activities should designate this location. If the injured person is immobile one or

more persons should remain nearby to provide any necessary first aid techniques. If medical help is necessary, the

Site HSO will summon the appropriate assistance for transportation to the nearest medical facility. Due to the

potential for these situations, CDG recommends that at least one qualified person be CPR/First Aid certified.

11.4 Evacuation Plan

Gasoline and diesel are flammable substances; therefore, a fire/explosion potential exists during the excavation

activities. In the event of an onsite evacuation, the following plan will be implemented:

• A signal consisting of one continuous blast of a vehicle or air horn will be used

• All personnel will immediately evacuate the area and report to the designated emergency meeting

location for further instruction

11.5 Spill Prevention and Response

In the event of a leak or spill, the area will be blocked using barricades, and the spill contained until absorbed and

removed by authorized personnel. Unauthorized persons will be denied access to the area until all spills have been

removed and field operations completed. CDG will follow prescribed procedures for reporting and responding to

large releases by notifying the National Response Center (see Section 11.7). All materials will be disposed of

according to regulatory guidelines.

11.6 Emergency Communication

In the event of an emergency situation, the following standard hand signals will be used onsite as a means of

communication:

Page 93: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

20

• Hand gripping throat-(cannot breathe)

• Grip partner’s wrist or both hands around waist- (leave area immediately)

• Hands on top of head- (need assistance)

• Thumbs up- (OK, I am all right, I understand)

• Thumbs down- (No, negative)

11.7 Contingency Contacts

In the event of an emergency, CDG has provided several emergency contacts. These contacts, along with phone

numbers, are listed in the following table. The Site HSO will be responsible for the notification of these contacts in

the event of an emergency.

AGENCY CONTACT TELEPHONE NO.

Fire Department 911

Police Department 911

Ambulance 911

Hospital 1-334-793-5000

Corporate HSO David Dailey 1-205-403-2600

Project Manager Daniel Roe 1-256-891-3458

EPA RCRA-Superfund Hotline 1-800-424-9346

Chemtrec (24 hours) 1-800-424-9300

Bureau of Explosives (24 hours) 1-202-293-4048

Centers for Disease Control (Biological Agents) 1-404-633-5353

National Response Center 1-800-424-8802

Medical Facility Name of Hospital: Flowers Hospital Address: 4370 W Main St., Dothan, AL Phone: 334-793-5000 Route to Hospital: see attached map with driving directions Travel Time from Site: 12 minutes Distance to Hospital: 5.9 miles Name/Number of 24-hour Ambulance Service: 911 In cases of construction accidents, rapid notification to OSHA is required.

Page 94: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

10/5/2018 Flowers Hospital to 2154 Denton Rd, Dothan, AL 36303 - Google Maps

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Flowers+Hospital,+1056,+4370+W+Main+St,+Dothan,+AL+36305/2154+Denton+Rd,+Dothan,+AL+36303/@31.271… 1/2

Map data ©2018 Google 1 mi

1056, 4370 W Main St, Dothan, AL 36305

Dothan, AL 36303

Flowers Hospital

1. Head south toward W Main St

2. Turn left toward W Main St

3. Turn right onto W Main St

4. Turn right onto John D Odom Rd

5. Turn left onto Napier Field Rd

6. Turn right onto Parramore Rd

7. Turn right onto Denton Rd Destination will be on the right

2154 Denton Rd

112 ft

449 ft

0.1 mi

3.2 mi

2.0 mi

0.2 mi

0.3 mi

Drive 5.9 miles, 12 minFlowers Hospital to 2154 Denton Rd, Dothan, AL36303

Page 95: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

10/5/2018 Flowers Hospital to 2154 Denton Rd, Dothan, AL 36303 - Google Maps

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Flowers+Hospital,+1056,+4370+W+Main+St,+Dothan,+AL+36305/2154+Denton+Rd,+Dothan,+AL+36303/@31.271… 2/2

These directions are for planning purposes only.You may �nd that construction projects, tra�c,weather, or other events may cause conditions todiffer from the map results, and you should planyour route accordingly. You must obey all signs ornotices regarding your route.

Page 96: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

ADEM Forms

APPENDIX F

Page 97: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

UST RELEASE FACT SHEET

GENERAL INFORMATION:

SITE NAME: Citgo Food Mart #115 ADDRESS: 2154 Denton Road Dothan, Houston County, Alabama FACILITY I.D. NO.: 10037-069-012234 UST INCIDENT NO.: UST13-08-03

RESULTS OF EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT:

How many private drinking water wells are located within 1,000 ft. of site? 0

How many public water supply wells are located within 1 mile of the site? 1

Have any drinking water supply wells been impacted by contamination from this release? No

Is there an imminent threat of contamination to any drinking water wells? { } Yes {X} No

Have vapors or contaminated groundwater posed a threat to the public? { } Yes {X} No

Are any underground utilities impacted or imminently threatened by the release? { } Yes {X} No

Have surface waters been impacted by the release? { } Yes {X} No

Is there an imminent threat of contamination to surface waters? { } Yes {X} No

What is the type of surrounding population? Commercial/Residential

CONTAMINATION DESCRIPTION:

Type of contamination at site: {X} Gasoline, {X} Diesel, { } Waste Oil { } Kerosene, { } Other ______________

Free product present in wells? { } Yes {X} No Maximum thickness measured: N/A

Maximum TPH concentrations measured in soil: 18 ppm

Maximum BTEX or PAH concentrations measured in groundwater: 18.62 mg/L in MW-5 (10/31/13)

ADEM UST Form - 001 (04/22/93)

Page 98: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

ADEM GROUNDWATER BRANCH UST SITE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

CHECKLIST

Please read all of the following statements and mark either yes or no if the statement applies to your site. If you have conducted a Preliminary or Secondary Investigation, all questions should be answered. Closure site assessment reports may not provide you with all the necessary information but answer the statements with the knowledge obtained during the closure site assessment. SITE NAME: Citgo Food Mart #115

SITE ADDRESS: 2154 Denton Road

Dothan, Houston County, Alabama

FACILITY I.D. NO.: 10037-069-012234

UST INCIDENT NO.: UST13-08-03

OWNER NAME: A. W. Herndon Oil Company, Inc.

OWNER ADDRESS: P. O. Box 640

Abbeville, Alabama 36310

NAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM:

Daniel C. Roe

CDG Engineers & Associates, Inc.

3 Riverchase Ridge

Hoover, Alabama 35244

CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION YES NO

CLASS A IMMEDIATE THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, HUMAN SAFETY OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTOR

A.1 Vapor concentrations at or approaching explosive levels that could cause health effects, are present in a residence or building.

A.2 Vapor concentrations at or approaching explosive levels are present in subsurface utility system(s), but no buildings or residences are impacted.

CLASS B IMMEDIATE THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, HUMAN SAFETY OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTOR

B.1 An active public water supply well, public water supply line or public surface water intake is impacted or immediately threatened.

B.2 An active domestic water supply well, domestic water supply line or domestic surface water intake is impacted or immediately threatened.

B.3 The release is located within a designated Wellhead Protection Area I.

CLASS C IMMEDIATE THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, HUMAN SAFETY OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTOR

C.1 Ambient vapor/particulate concentrations exceed concentrations of concern from an acute exposure, or safety viewpoint.

C.2 Free product is present on the groundwater, at ground surface, on surface water bodies, in utilities other than water supply lines, or in surface water runoff.

Page 99: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION YES NO

CLASS D SHORT TERM THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, SAFETY, OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTORS

D.1 There is a potential for explosive levels, or concentrations of vapors that could cause acute effects, to accumulate in a residence or other building.

D.2 A non-potable water supply well is impacted or immediately threatened.

D.3 Shallow contaminated surface soils are open to public access, and dwellings, parks, playgrounds, day care centers, schools or similar use facilities are within 500 feet of those soils.

CLASS E SHORT TERM THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, SAFETY, OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTORS

E.1 A sensitive habitat or sensitive resources (sport fish, economically important species, threatened and endangered species, etc.) are impacted and affected.

CLASS F SHORT TERM THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, SAFETY, OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTORS

F.1 Groundwater is impacted, and a public well is located within 1 mile of the site.

F.2 Groundwater is impacted and a domestic well is located within 1,000 feet of the site.

F.3 Contaminated soils and/or groundwater are located within designated Wellhead Protection Areas (Areas II or III).

CLASS G SHORT TERM THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, SAFETY, OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTORS

G.1 Contaminated soils and/or groundwater are located within areas vulnerable to contamination from surface sources.

GLASS H SHORT TERM THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, SAFETY, OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTORS

H.1 Impacted surface water, storm water or groundwater discharges within 500 feet of a surface water body used for human drinking water, whole body water-contact sports, or habitat to a protected or listed endangered plant and animal species.

CLASS I LONG TERM THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH, SAFETY, OR SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTORS

I.1. Site has contaminated soils and/or groundwater but does not meet any of the above-mentioned criteria.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Complete the classification evaluation questions listed above. Upon completion, determine the highest rank of the site (A.1 is the highest rank) based on the statements answered with a yes.

Enter the determined classification ranking:

F.1

ADEM GROUNDWATER BRANCH SITE CLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST (5/8/95)

Page 100: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

TASKS PERFORMANCESUMMARY

APPENDIX G

Page 101: CITGO FOOD MART #115results and submitted for laboratory analysis. Submitted samples were analyzed for the ... Site Closure Report - This report will describe in detail the closure

Task Completed by Personnel/Title:Michelle

Grantham, SPM

David Dailey,

P.E.

Daniel Roe,

ES/PM

Ann Dyer,

Geologist

Charles Bode,

Tech.

Karen Moore,

Admin.

Project Management X X X

Work Plan Preparation/Review X X

Cost Proposal Preparation/Review X X

Field Work

Data Interpretation/Tabulations X X

Drafting X

Report Preparation/Review X X X X X

Payment Request Preparation/Review X X X

Notes:

DO=Drilling Oversight

BL=Boring Log Description/Soil Classification

WG=Well Gauging

GSC=Groundwater Sample Collection

MEME=MEME Oversight

PM=Project Management

O&M=Routine Operation & Maintenance

VM=Vapor Monitoring

FC=Fan Check

TASK PERFORMANCE SUMMARYCAP Modification (CP-25)

Dothan, Houston County, Alabama

2154 Denton Road

Citgo Food Mart #115