CITY OF EL CENTRO Pedestrian Bicyclist Improvement Project Centro Final 2014 ATP... · 2016. 9. 28. · 8th Street improvement project would solve these issues and enhance pedestrian

C I T Y O F E L C E N T R O

Pedestrian& Bicyclist

ImprovementProject

Active TransportationProgram (Cycle 1)

MAY 2014

ORIGINAL

Page 1 of 8

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

CYCLE 1

APPLICATION Part 1

(Includes Sections I, V, VI, VII, VIII & XI)

Please read the Application Instructions at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/index.html

prior to filling out this application

For Caltrans use only: ____TAP ____STP____ RTP ____SRTS ____SRTS-NI ____SHA ____DAC ____Non-DAC ____Plan

Project name:

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/index.html

anava

Oval

anava

Rectangle

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1-2

II. PROJECT INFORMATION 3-5

III. SCREENING CRITERIA 6-7

IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS Q1-Q8 8

Question 1 8-11

Question 2 12-15

Question 3 15-17

Question 4 17-18

Question 5 18-19

Question 6 20-22

Question 7 22

Question 8 22

V. PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST 23

VI. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 24

VII. NON-INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE INFORMATION 25

VIII. APPLICATION SIGNATURES 26

IX. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS 27

Attachment A- Vicinity/Location Map 28

Attachment B- Photos & Video of Existing Location 29-34

Attachment C- Preliminary Plans 35

Attachment D- Detailed Engineer’s Estimate 36

Attachment E- Bicycle Master Plan Map 37-38

Attachment F- Documentation of Public Participation Process 38-62

Attachment G- Letter of Support from Impacted School 63-70

Attachment H- Additional Documentation

Attachment H-1- Additional Schools Benefited by the Project 71 Attachment H-2- Project Programming Request 72-75 Attachment H-3- CalEnviroScreen Map 76 Attachment H-4- Census Data 77-79 Attachment H-5- Collision Diagrams & Accident Data 80-85 Attachment H-6- Benefit/Cost Ratio 86 Attachment H-7- School Data 87-88

I. GENERAL INFORMATION-continued Sub-Project Type (Select all that apply) 21. Develop a Plan in a Disadvantaged Community (select the type(s) of plan(s) to be developed)

Bicycle Plan Safe Routes to School Plan Pedestrian Plan Active Transportation Plan

(If applying for an Active Transportation Plan- check any of the following plans that your agency already has):

Bike plan Pedestrian plan Safe Routes to School plan ATP plan 22. Bicycle and/or Pedestrian infrastructure Bicycle only: Class I Class II Class III

Ped/Other: Sidewalk Crossing Improvement Multi-use facility

Other:

23. Non-Infrastructure (Non SRTS) 24. Recreational Trails*- Trail Acquisition

*Please see additional Recreational Trails instructions before proceeding

25. Safe routes to school- Infrastructure Non-Infrastructure

If SRTS is selected, provide the following information 26. SCHOOL NAME & ADDRESS: 27. SCHOOL DISTRICT NAME & ADDRESS: 28. County-District-School Code (CDS)

29. Total Student Enrollment 30. Percentage of students eligible for free or reduced meal programs **

31. Percentage of students that currently walk or bike to school

32. Approximate # of students living along school route proposed for improvement

33. Project distance from primary or middle school

**Refer to the California Department of Education website: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sh/cw/filesafdc.asp Click here if the project involves more than one school; attach the remaining school information including school official signature and person to contact, if different, on a separate page

Project name:

City of El Centro Pedestrian and Bicyclist Improvement Project Page 2

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sh/cw/filesafdc.asp

anava

Typewritten Text

(Combined ATP/SR2S Plan)

anava

Rectangle

II. PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Location - The City of El Centro is located in the southeastern portion of California

within Imperial County (Refer to Attachment A- Vicinity/Location Map). The City is

seeking ATP funding for the preparation of a combined Active Transportation Plan and

Safe Routes to School Plan (ATP/SR2S) and to make pedestrian and bicyclist related

improvements at various locations. The Plan would prepare the City for the active

transportation needs of the entire community within the City Limits. The pedestrian and

bicyclist safety related improvements would be along 8th Street from Adams Avenue to

Aurora Drive for a distance of approximately 1.25 miles. Improvements along this segment

would consist of striping of a Class II bicycle lane, curb extensions at three locations along

8th Street, Brighton Avenue, Hamilton Avenue, and Wensley Avenue. Other improvements

along 8th Street would include the construction of sidewalks where there are gaps in

sidewalk, ADA compliant curb returns and re-striping of the vehicle lanes to narrow them

with the purpose of reducing vehicle speeds. Other improvements proposed are ADA

compliant curb returns along Park Avenue, and a speed monitor at the intersection of Scott

Avenue and 8th Street to deter speeding near McKinley Elementary School. A rapid

flashing beacon is also proposed at the intersection of 1st Street and State Street in front of

Washington Elementary (Refer to Attachment C – Preliminary Plan).

Project Coordinates Latitude 32.784197 Longitude 115.561166 (Decimal degrees)

2. Project Description – If awarded, the ATP grant would allow El Centro to commission a

combined Active Transportation Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan. The City has not

previously commissioned the preparation of these Plans, yet they are essential in

assessing the non-motorized transportation needs of our community. An Active

Transportation Plan, consistent with adopted ATP Guidelines, as well as a Safe Routes to


School Plan that includes a safe route to school map for each of the schools would be

prepared. A safe route to school map for each of our schools is critical as it has been

determined through surveys that 71% of our schools do not have a designated safe route

to school. The combined Plan would allow the City to prioritize improvements to enhance

the safety of our community and encourage active modes of transportation. In addition to a

combined ATP/SR2S Plan, through the public participation process it was determined that

at least one street in the City should be a Complete Street and meet the needs of

pedestrians, bicyclists, and take into account the needs of people with disabilities, older

people and children. Through the public participation process, it was determined that 8th

Street, located in the center of the City, intersects with Main Street and is surrounded by

schools as well as destination centers would be improved. Proposed improvements along

8th Street would consist of the striping of a Class II Bike Lane between Aurora Drive and

Adams Avenue for a distance of approximately 6,600 lineal feet (1.25 miles) along both the

east and west sides of 8th Street. A speed monitor would be also installed at the

intersection of Rose Avenue and 8th Street to deter speeding near McKinley Elementary

School. Curb ramps, in accordance with ADA requirements, as well as sidewalks in

areas where they are missing would be constructed. Curb extensions/bulbouts at three

locations along 8th Street would be constructed; one would be situated at Brighton Avenue,

another at Hamilton Avenue and the other at Wensley Avenue. The Hamilton Avenue and

Wensley Avenue curb extensions would also include rapid flashing beacons. The curb

extensions with a flashing beacon would significantly improve these pedestrian crossings

by reducing the crossing distance and improving the ability of pedestrians and motorists to

see each other and thus, reduce the potential for accidents. The Brighton Avenue and

Hamilton Avenue locations were selected as they would provide a safe crossing for

students traveling to Central Union High School, Wilson Junior High School and school


aged children traveling towards the recently constructed MLK Sports Pavilion, located at

the intersection of 8th Street and Adams Avenue. The Wensley Avenue was selected to

significantly reduce the crossing distance for students at Harding Elementary School, which

lacks a crosswalk at this location and where the roadway is very wide, approximately 80-

feet. The wide width of the roadway encourages high vehicle speeds and unsafe

conditions for pedestrians.

In addition to improvements along 8th

Street, infrastructure needs were identified

at Park Avenue which is also going to be

heavily used by pedestrians traveling to

the MLK Sports Pavilion. ADA ramps are

proposed to be constructed at the Park

Avenue and 8th Street intersection. A

rapid flashing beacon is also proposed at the intersection of 1st Street and State Street

which was requested by Washington Elementary School and would improve the safety of

pedestrians at this location.

3. Project Status - ATP/SR2S Plan- The proposed combined ATP/SR2S Plan and 8th Street

project have been deemed exempt from CEQA. However, the NEPA process would need

to be completed in collaboration with Caltrans Staff. Upon award, Staff will complete a

Request for Proposals for the preparation of the Plan, procure a planning firm, and begin

public participation, and the preparation of the Plan.

8th Street and 1st Street Improvement Projects- Preliminary design has been completed

by Engineering Staff. No right of way or encroachment permit will be required for the

proposed 8th Street and 1st Street projects. Plans and specifications would need to be

completed and it is anticipated they would be completed within 9 months.


III. SCREENING CRITERIA 1. Demonstrated Needs of the Applicant-

The City of El Centro is seeking funding for a combined Active Transportation Plan/SR2S

Plan. Through consultation with City schools and the school districts, it was determined that

the majority of the schools do not have a designated safe route to school. The City of El

Centro currently does not have an Active Transportation Plan to determine the pedestrian

and bicyclist needs of our community. The combined ATP/SR2S will help determined the

mobility needs of pedestrians and bicyclists and would situate the City in a better position to

obtain future funding for these improvements.

Although 8th Street is one of the major thoroughfares in the City, it lacks many basic needs

for pedestrians and bicyclists. As identified by school principals adjacent to the project

area, necessary infrastructure is necessary to improve pedestrian and bicyclist mobility.

Crosswalks are missing adjacent to schools, curb returns are in disrepair or lacking, the

roadway is too wide which leads to motorists speeding, and inherently creates unsafe

conditions for school age children walking to school and other pedestrians. The proposed

8th Street improvement project would solve these issues and enhance pedestrian mobility.

The City of El Centro is a disadvantaged community with a median household income of

$41,418, which represents only 67% of the State’s median household income. The

students to benefit from the improvements attend schools for which greater than 75% of

students are eligible for free or reduced lunch. Without this grant, the City has insufficient

funding to cover the expenses of both an ATP/SR2S plan and 8th Street improvements.

These improvements are much needed to improve pedestrian and bicyclist mobility in the

City.


2. Consistency with Regional Transportation Plan (100 words or less) Explain how this project is consistent with your Regional Transportation Plan (if applicable). Include adoption date of the plan.

The proposed combined ATP/SR2S Plan and 8th Street Improvements projects are

consistent with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted

Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) 2012-2035/Sustainable Communities Strategy

(SCS), adopted April 2012. Under California’s SB375, the primary goal of the SCS is to

provide a vision for future growth that will decrease per capita GHG emissions from

automobiles and light trucks. The project will undoubtedly decrease GHG emissions by

reducing the amount of vehicle trips, providing safe sidewalks, and improving roadways

to be more conducive to walking and bicycling and create a better place to live,

consistent with the adopted RTP “better placemaking goal”. The 8th Street

improvements will include bulbouts/curb extensions to shorten crossing distances,

incorporate a Class II Bike Lane, and include sidewalks where there are gaps,

eliminating unsafe conditions. Eighth Street’s location, in the center of the City allows for

wide access by all segments of the community, inclusive of school aged children and

the elderly. All groups of the community seek to benefit from this project as it will

remove barriers to walking, living an active lifestyle, improving the public health of the

community, and reducing the negative effects of the automobile such as pollution,

leading to improved air quality.


IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS

1. POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED WALKING AND BICYCLING, ESPECIALLY AMONG STUDENTS,

INCLUDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ROUTES TO AND FROM SCHOOLS, TRANSIT FACILITIES, COMMUNITY CENTERS, EMPLOYMENT CENTERS, AND OTHER DESTINATIONS; AND INCLUDING INCREASING AND IMPROVING CONNECTIVITY AND MOBILITY OF NON-MOTORIZED USERS. (0-30 POINTS)

A. Describe how your project encourages increased walking and bicycling, especially among students.

The proposed combined Active Transportation Plan/SR2S Plan will assess existing

conditions in the City, identify safety issues, and infrastructure deficiencies by identifying

where sidewalks and curb returns are missing. These deficiencies will then be converted to

a phased project listing, allowing the City to strategize and determine where improvements

are necessary to establish a more walkable and bikeable community. As funding becomes

available City Staff will then have a basis to construct improvements. A combined

ATP/SR2S Plan will consolidate the school’s and the City’s needs. This collaborative

approach with the school districts will provide an additional perspective and provide

students with a designated Safe Route to School which most schools in the City lack (71%

identified they lacked a SR2S route). The Safe Routes to School Map for each of the

schools will be disseminated to parents and inform them that walking to school can be safe

for their children.

The second component of our project involves infrastructure improvements along 8th

Street, located in the center of our City and intersecting major destination centers in our

community such as various schools, Imperial County’s Administrative Building, the Court

House, Imperial Valley Transit Transfer Station, City Hall, seven (7) churches and the

recently constructed indoor Sports Complex, located at the southeast corner of 8th Street

and Adams Avenue (estimated that it will receive 164 visitors daily), which will be a main

destination for children during the hot summer months where the daytime temperatures can

range from 115°-122°. The improvements along 8th Street will create a safer walking and


biking environment, increasing the number of individuals walking and biking by improving

infrastructure conditions.

B. Describe the number and type of possible users and their destinations, and the anticipated percentage increase in users upon completion of your project. Data collection methods should be described.

The possible users from the 8th Street improvements include students from the following

schools: Harding Elementary (505 students), McKinley Elementary (415 students), Wilson

Junior High (689 students), and Central Union High School (1,877 students). The total

student population combined for these schools is 3,486 students (student figures are based

on enrollment data) (Refer Attachment H-7- School Data). Of these students, it is

estimated that on average, only approximately 20% walk to school or 697 students, based

on parent surveys conducted by the Imperial County Public Health Department. Per

pedestrian and bicyclist traffic counts conducted, approximately 215 pedestrians were

counted along 8th Street between Wensley Avenue and Brighton Avenue. It is estimated

that as a result of the grant, there would be an increase of about 30% of pedestrians and

bicyclists given the recent construction of the Sports Complex which will add additional

demand to 8th Street. It is anticipated that the recent construction of the Sports Complex,

which will include various sports facilities within it, will attract 60,000 visitors annually.

During the summer months where daytime temperatures can reach 115° it is anticipated

the number of school-aged children walking along 8th Street will increase as they will be

walking from nearby neighborhood to the Sports Complex. Children and teens will likely

walk or bike to the Sports Complex while parents are at work. In addition to the various

schools along 8th Street, there are seven (7) churches along 8th Street, and it is possible

church attendees will choose to walk to church after the sidewalk improvements are

completed. The Imperial Valley Transit Transfer Station which has which has an

approximate 2,500 visitors daily is also situated 0.14 miles or 756 feet from the

improvements and it is anticipated that those walking or biking towards the transfer station


will benefit from the 8th Street improvements. Other major destination centers include City

Hall, County Administrative Building, the Court House and the Hospital. A major

recreational park, Bucklin Park is also located along the area to be improved. Many visitors

walk or run to the park and enjoy its jogging paths. Improving 8th Street sidewalks will also

improve the safety of those jogging or walking to the park.

As it relates to the combined ATP/SR2S Plan, Staff and the public at large will be able to

use the Plan. The Plan would allow Staff to budget for future improvements that are listed

in the Plan and note where there are unmet needs. The Plan would also allow school

officials to disseminate SR2S Map to parent’s and promote walking to school.

C. Describe how this project improves walking and bicycling routes to and from, connects to, or is part of a school or school facility, transit facility, community center, employment center, state or national trail system, points of interest, and/or park.

The 8th Street project consists of the striping of a Class II Bike Lane, curb ramps, and

sidewalks (where missing) between Aurora Drive and Adams Avenue along 8th Street.

Curb extensions/bulbouts with rapid flashing beacons will be constructed along 8th

Street at Brighton Avenue, Hamilton Avenue Wensley

Avenue. The purpose of these improvements is to

reduce the roadway’s width which is 80-feet at these

segments and allow pedestrians and students to cross

safely. Along the project segment there are four (4)

schools, a recently constructed indoor Sports Complex

that is being finalized for the use of the public, seven (7) churches, the Imperial Valley

Transit Transfer Station (bus terminal), two (2) bus stops, and the City’s most widely used

recreational park, Bucklin Park and major civic buildings. The Class II bike lane along 8th

Street will improve the safety of bicyclists, especially those traveling to Harding Elementary,

Wilson Junior High School and Central Union High School by providing a designated 4-foot

Example of a Curb Extension with Bike Lane


lane for their use and improve bicycle connectivity in the City (Refer to Attachment C-

Preliminary Plan). The striping will also signal drivers to stay within their designated lane.

The sidewalks and ADA curb ramps will provide a safe route for all pedestrians and provide

a safe route for students walking to school. The curb extensions with rapid flashing

beacons will improve visibility for school children traveling to school and for motorists.

The ATP/SR2S combined Plan will improve walking routes by identifying gaps in sidewalk,

ADA deficiencies, and hazardous conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists. By identifying

our needs, we will be able to pursue additional funding to improve our infrastructure.

Additionally, the Plan will allow to target the neediest areas and prioritize them. As a result

of the Plan we will be able to plan for funding, construct improvements and improve walking

and bicycling throughout our community.

D. Describe how this project increases and/or improves connectivity, removes a barrier to mobility and/or closes a gap in a non-motorized facility.

Pedestrian connectivity will be improved by removing barriers to mobility such as

inadequate sidewalks, incompliant ADA curb returns, or the construction of curb

returns where there are none, in addition to construction of sidewalks in areas where

there are gaps.

The ATP/SR2S combined Plan will increase and improve connectivity by identifying

the barriers to mobility and close gaps in non-motorized facilities. After the

identification of barriers to mobility, the Plan will include how these barriers will be

eliminated through the identification of funding sources and a phased plan for

improvements.


IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued 2. POTENTIAL FOR REDUCING THE NUMBER AND/OR RATE OF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST

FATALITIES AND INJURIES, INCLUDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF SAFETY HAZARDS FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS. (0-25 POINTS)

A. Describe the potential of the project to reduce pedestrian and/or bicycle injuries or fatalities.

According to the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) from January 1,

2003 to December 31, 2012 there have been a total of 52 accidents along 8th Street from

Aurora Avenue to Park Avenue (project segment), which include vehicular, pedestrian and

bicyclist related accidents. Of the 52 accidents, 13.5% of accidents were involved with a

bicycle, 9.6% were involved with a pedestrian and 71.2% were

involved with another vehicle. Many of the vehicular accidents

are broadside (T-Bone) accidents. The proposed project

could potentially reduce these types of accidents by improving

visibility at intersections and reducing vehicular speeds along

8th Street through curb extensions, bike lanes, and reducing

the width of driving lanes. Bicycle-related accidents could

potentially be decreased through the striping of vehicle lanes as they designate a space for

bike lanes and vehicles, reducing the likelihood of collisions. The

project area currently lacks bicycle lanes. Curb extensions will

also improve visibility for motorists by eliminating the parking of

vehicles near intersections. Pedestrians will greatly benefit by

the improvements as curb extensions will shorten crossing

distances, decreasing the potential of collisions with vehicles.

Rapid flashing beacons, located at crosswalks will alert vehicles

when pedestrians are crossing and ensure that vehicles yield to

pedestrians, thereby, reducing pedestrian related accidents. Since the proposed project will


reduce vehicular speeds, even if a collision between a pedestrian and a vehicle were to

occur, the reduction of vehicular speeds would lead to

pedestrian injuries that are less severe. Studies

indicate that injury rates drop as vehicle speeds

decrease. When vehicles are traveling at 20 mph 9 out

of 10 pedestrians survive, however, when vehicle

speeds increase to 40 mph only 1 our 10 pedestrians survives. The potential to reduce the

number of accidents along this segment is enormous simply by implementing measures

that reduce vehicular speeds along this segment.

The ATP/SR2S combined Plan would also reduce pedestrian and bicyclists accidents

through its implementation. The Plan would identify the location of safety hazards and

gaps in pedestrian and bicyclist related infrastructure. Once the needs are identified, they

would be programmed for funding, and eliminated after improvements are constructed.

Through the Plan’s eliminated, accidents would be reduced.

B. Describe if/how your project will achieve any or all of the following:

The proposed 8th Street improvements will achieve all of the following:

Reduce speed of motor vehicles- The current speed limit is 35 mph, however, vehicle

speeds are much greater at 40-45 mph given the 80-foot width along various segments of

the roadway. The project will reduce vehicle speeds by decreasing the width of the

roadway to 10’8”, striping a bike lane, and allowing parking on both sides of the roadway,

which will add friction and slow vehicle speeds. Curb extensions will also encourage

motorists to travel slowly at intersections with curb extensions, as the restricted street width

sends a visual cue to motorists. More than 80 percent of pedestrians hit by vehicles

traveling at 40 mph or faster will die, while less than 10 percent will die when hit at 20 mph


or less. The proposed improvements will slow motorists to ensure the safety of school

children.

Improve sight distance and visibility- The project will improve sight distance and visibility

through the construction of curb extensions. Curb extensions will be placed at critical

intersections preventing motorists from parking in or too close to a crosswalk and from

blocking a curb ramp of crosswalk. Motor vehicles parked too close to corners are a threat

to pedestrian safety as they block sightlines, obscure visibility of pedestrians and other

vehicles.

Improves compliance with local traffic laws- The 8th Street improvements will encourage

vehicles to comply with speed limit laws. Most of the accidents that have occurred could

have been prevented by slower traffic speeds. Through the reduction of lane widths, there

will be additional roadway friction that will deter vehicles from speeding and improve

compliance with traffic laws.

Eliminate behaviors that lead to collisions- Speeding is one of the major factors that

lead to collisions. This project will deter motorists from speeding due to narrower lanes and

curb extensions. Additionally, designated bike lanes will assist cyclists by riding on the

correct side of the street and not ride on sidewalks, which has been evidenced along the

project site (Refer to Attachment B- Project Photos or Video).

Address inadequate bicycle facilities, crosswalks or sidewalks- The proposed project

will incorporate bike lanes, crosswalks, and sidewalks where there are none. The striping

of bike lanes and crosswalks will greatly improve the safety of the area, especially for

pedestrians. In many areas along the project’s length as there are gaps or inadequate

sidewalks; these areas will be improved with new ADA compliant sidewalks and curb

returns.


The ATP/SR2S combined Plan will also achieve the aforementioned through the location

and identification of safety hazards. After the hazards are identified, they would be phased

into improvement projects. The Plan would also prioritize the improvements and identify

funding sources to complete the improvements.

C. Describe the location’s history of events and the source(s) of data used (e.g. collision reports, community

observation, surveys, audits) if data is not available include a description of safety hazard(s) and photos.

Traffic accident data was obtained from Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System

(TIMS). Data identifies 52 accidents along 8th Street from Aurora Avenue to Park Avenue

January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2012. Of the 52 accidents during this time period, 12 of

the accidents were pedestrian and bicyclist related. The accidents occurred along the

entire project segment. It is anticipated that if the project is funded accidents along this

segment. Collisions will decrease as vehicles will need to slow down as a result of the

improvements. All 12 accidents resulted in injury of the pedestrian or bicyclist (Refer to

Attachment H-5- Collision Diagrams & Accident Data).

3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION and PLANNING (0-15 POINTS)

A. Describe the community based public participation process that culminated in the project proposal or plan, such as noticed meetings/public hearings, consultation with stakeholders, etc.

The community outreach process was achieved through consultation with stakeholders.

The process began on February 21, 2014 by sending a letter to school principals,

accompanied by a school survey to all schools within the City Limits, including charter

schools (Refer to Attachment F- Documentation of Public Participation Process). The

letter informed school principals that the City intended to submit an Active Transportation

Program grant application. The survey provided asked school principals questions in

regards to the following: if they were interested in collaborating with the City regarding the

proposed grant, what types of projects they were interested in requesting funding for, asked

that principals identify a project need, identify a project location, if 75% of students were


eligible for free or reduced lunch and whether their school had a designated route to

school.

Of the 18 surveys sent to local schools, 17 principals responded to the letter and 15

surveys were completed by school principals requesting infrastructure-related

improvements. After the survey results were analyzed, it was determined that the majority

of our schools (71%) identified that they did not have a designated safe route to school

map and of those, 90% indicated that they desired a designated safe route to school map.

A multitude of infrastructure projects were requested by schools, thus, it was determined

that a combined Active Transportation Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan should be

prepared to identify and prioritize all of the non-motorized transportation needs of our

community. Given the number of project requests along 8th Street and the number of

students that use this thoroughfare, it was determined that this roadway should be

prioritized first to ensure that at least one of the City’s roadways could identify the needs of

all segments of the community bicyclists, public transportation riders, and pedestrians of all

ages and abilities and be a “complete street.” The support for the project is further evidence

by the five (5) letters of support received by the affected schools and the letter of support

from the El Centro Elementary School District (Refer to Attachment G- Letters of

Support).

B. Describe the local participation process that resulted in the identification and prioritization of the project:

Typically, the City’s approach to obtain public participation from the public for grant projects

was to conduct public hearings and noticed meetings. However, this approach was not

successful as there were insufficient participants at the meetings to obtain meaningful

participation. For this grant, we attempted to obtain different points of view by sending

personalized letters to school principals and the various school district superintendents.

Sending letters to school principals accompanied by a survey was important as school


principals receive complaints from parents and are in leadership positions and understand

the needs of their schools and students. Of the 18 surveys sent, 15 surveys were received

and identified that the majority of schools did not have a Safe Routes to School

Designated Route. They also identified the need for various transportation projects that

could not all be funded through this grant. It was concluded that an Active Transportation

Plan combined with a Safe Routes to School Plan should be completed to include, plan,

and prioritize all of the projects suggested by the schools. Given the number of schools that

are along 8th Street, its heavy pedestrian use, and the number of projects that were

requested by schools along 8th Street, it was noted that 8th Street should be prioritized first

and thus funding is being requested for this roadway to make 8th Street a complete street

and accommodate all users.

C. Is the project cost over $1 Million? Y/N NO

If Yes- is the project Prioritized in an adopted city or county bicycle transportation plan, pedestrian plan, safe routes to school plan, active transportation plan, trail plan, circulation element of a general plan, or other publicly approved plan that incorporated elements of an active transportation plan? Y/N NO The project does not cost over $1 million.

4. COST EFFECTIVENESS (0-10 POINTS)

A. Describe the alternatives that were considered. Discuss the relative costs and benefits of all the alternatives and explain why the nominated one was chosen.

There are various mitigation measures available to increase safety at specific locations,

however, some are not feasible or not desirable for a given location or situation. Given that

a crossing guard is already at the site and 8th street is a 4-lane arterial street, education

efforts to students would help safety efforts, however, addressing the source of the problem

by reducing traffic speed would have a stronger effect in promoting walking and bicycling.

Striping a Class II bike lane was selected for two reasons: 1) the location is already a class

III bike lane that would be improved by a converting it to a class II bike lane; 2) converting


H-4- Census Data). Child obesity and asthma greatly affect our region. Recent data

indicates that Mexican American children were 1.6 times more likely to be overweight as

Non-Hispanic White Children and in El Centro 92% of elementary school children are

Hispanic (Source: The Office of Minority Health). A Health Study conducted by UCLA

concluded that 45.8% of 5th, 7th, and 9th grade school children in El Centro were overweight

or obese which is very high in comparison to cities such as San Diego, where only 33.5%

of the same grade school children were overweight or obese. Obesity is associated

significantly with the development asthma, thus, there is a correlation between asthma and

obesity. Imperial County has one of the highest child asthma rates at 15.4% in comparison

to the State’s 10.1%.Hospitalizations for asthma in El Centro are the highest in the State,

according to Imperial County’s Public Health Department Status Report.

The City of El Centro is committed to the improvement of public health for our community.

The proposed project is one of many planned with the intent of decreasing our obesity rate

and having a healthier community. The improvements proposed along 8th Street which

consist of bike lanes, curb extensions and crosswalks will encourage children to walk to

school by providing a safe and convenient pathway to school. Many parents do not allow

their children to walk to school due to lack of safety along the project area. The

improvements will improve safety along 8th Street by reducing the distance children have to

walk through the use of curb extensions. The curb extensions will also improve visibility for

both pedestrians and motorists, decreasing the potential for accidents. Bike lane striping

will also signal drivers to stay within their designated lane and slow them down by creating

more roadway friction while providing a safe lane for bicyclists. These improvements will

encourage more children to walk to school. By walking to school they will obtain additional

exercise they are currently not obtaining and improve their health through additional

exercise.


6. BENEFIT TO DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES (0-10 points)

A. I. Is the project located in a disadvantaged community? Y/N YES II. Does the project significantly benefit a disadvantaged community? Y/N YES

a. Which criteria does the project meet? (Answer all that apply)

o Median household income for the community benefited by the project: $ 41,418 – El

Centro’s Median Household Income is $41,418 while the State’s is $61,400,

per American Community’s Survey 2008-2012 data. El Centro’s median

household income is only 67% of the State’s Median Household Income.

(Refer to Attachment H-4 Census Data).

o California Communities Environmental Health Screen Tool (CalEnvironScreen) score for the

community benefited by the project: El Centro is among the most disadvantaged

10% in the State. This percentage underscores that El Centro faces multiple

pollution burdens. The tool further identifies that this area has additional

vulnerability than other areas and is the most in need of assistance.

o For projects that benefit public school students, percentage of students eligible for the Free or Reduced Price Meals Programs: 95.0% (Refer to Attachment H-7- School Data.)

b. Should the community benefitting from the project be considered disadvantaged based on criteria

not specified in the program guidelines? If so, provide data for all criteria above and a quantitative assessment of why the community should be considered disadvantaged. Not Applicable/The community benefitting from the project is considered a

disadvantaged community using available data.

B. Describe how the project demonstrates a clear benefit to a disadvantaged community and what percentage of the project funding will benefit that community, for projects using the school based criteria describe specifically the school students and community will benefit.

Public health researchers have identified that walking and biking are not just forms of

travel, but they are also an important for of exercise. El Centro is seeking funding for a

combined Active Transportation Plan/Safe Routes to School Plan that could assist us in

prioritizing and inventorying the deficiencies in our active transportation network, such as


sidewalks and bikeways. The combined Plan would be for the benefit of the entire

community and would provide a comprehensive strategy to make El Centro a more

walkable, bikeable, and safe community for pedestrians and bicyclists, especially those that

are school-aged children. With the new and improved sidewalks and bikeways, it would

dramatically increase the number of walkers and bicyclists as the new accessibility would

also be incorporated into the schools’ healthy living initiatives for their students. After the

marketing to the students and parents of the new accessibility (sidewalks and bikeways),

we anticipate a 10% increase in walkers and bicyclists each school year. The City

encompasses an approximate 11 square miles which includes miles of sidewalks, is home

to fourteen (14) elementary schools/junior highs, four (4) high schools/adult schools and is

further bisected by the Union Pacific Railroad at various locations and in close proximity to

many schools. The Plan would be a guiding document for the development of a

bicycle/pedestrian network and would also include a safe routes to school strategy that

would provide a map for the use of each of our schools. The entire City of El Centro is a

disadvantaged community with a median household income (MHI) of $41,418, representing

only 67% of the State’s MHI and faces a variety of active transportation challenges. In

addition to being a poverty stricken city, 78% of our County’s adult population is overweight

or obese. Moreover, 45.8%-50% of 5th, 7th, and 9th grade students in the County’s major

cities, including El Centro were identified as overweight or obese. Through the public

participation process it was identified that four (4) schools out of the fifteen (15) schools

that responded to our survey had a safe route to school, identified on a map that could be

used by students and parents. We believe that all of the schools should have a Safe Route


to School Map and it is for these reasons we are requesting funding for a combined Active

Transportation Plan/Safe Routes to School Plan.

7. USE OF CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS (CCC) OR A CERTIFIED COMMUNITY CONSERVATION CORPS (0 to -5 points)

A. The applicant has coordinated with the CCC to identify how a state conservation corps can be a

partner of the project. Y/N Y a. Name, e-mail, and phone # of the person contacted and the date the information was

submitted to them

Name: Virginia Clark Email: [email protected] Ph.#: (916) 341-3147 Date Submitted: May 7, 2014

B. The applicant has coordinated with a representative from the California Association of Local Conservation Corps (CALCC) to identify how a certified community conservation corps can be a

partner of the project. Y/N Y a. Name, e-mail, and phone # of the person contacted and the date the information was

submitted to them

Name: Cynthia Vitale Email: [email protected] Ph.#: (916) 558-1516 Date Submitted: May 7, 2014

C. The applicant intends to utilize the CCC or a certified community conservation corps on all items where participation is indicated? Y/N TBD

I have coordinated with a representative of the CCC; and the following are project items that they are qualified to partner on:

Not Applicable. The CCC informed they will not be partnering with the City for this project.

I have coordinated with a representative of the CALCC; and the following are project items that they are qualified to partner on:

Have not received response as of May 15, 2014.

8. APPLICANT’S PERFORMANCE ON PAST GRANTS ( 0 to -10 points)

A. Describe any of your agency’s ATP type grant failures during the past 5 years, and what changes your agency will take in order to deliver this project.

Not Applicable- The City of El Centro has received grant awards from the California

Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the past 5 years and has not experienced

any challenges managing the grants. The City has performed satisfactorily on past

grants.


mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

VII. NON-INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE INFORMATION

Start Date End Date Task/Deliverables

Project name:


anava

Rectangle


anava

Rectangle

VIII. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS

Check all attachments included with this application.

Vicinity/Location Map- REQUIRED for all IF Projects North Arrow Label street names and highway route numbers Scale

Photos and/or Video of Existing Location- REQUIRED for all IF Projects

Minimum of one labeled color photo of the existing project location Minimum photo size 3 x 5 inches Optional video and/or time-lapse

Preliminary Plans- REQUIRED for Construction phase only

Must include a north arrow Label the scale of the drawing Typical Cross sections where applicable with property or right-of-way lines Label street names, highway route numbers and easements

Detailed Engineer’s Estimate- REQUIRED for Construction phase only

Estimate must be true and accurate. Applicant is responsible for verifying costs prior to submittal

Must show a breakdown of all bid items by unit and cost. Lump Sum may only be used per industry standards

Must identify all items that ATP will be funding Contingency is limited to 10% of funds being requested Evaluation required under the ATP guidelines is not a reimbursable item

Documentation of the partnering maintenance agreement- Required with the application if an entity,

other than the applicant, is going to assume responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the facility

Documentation of the partnering implementation agreement-Required with the application if an entity, other than the applicant, is going to implement the project.

Letters of Support from Caltrans (Required for projects on the State Highway System(SHS))

Digital copy of or an online link to an approved plan (bicycle, pedestrian, safe routes to school,

active transportation, general, recreation, trails, city/county or regional master plan(s), technical studies, and/or environmental studies (with environmental commitment record or list of mitigation measures), if applicable. Include/highlight portions that are applicable to the proposed project.

Documentation of the public participation process (required)

Letter of Support from impacted school- when the school isn’t the applicant or partner on the

application (required)

Additional documentation, letters of support, etc (optional)

Project name:


anava

Typewritten Text

See ATTACHMENT A

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

See ATTACHMENT B

anava

Typewritten Text

See ATTACHMENT C

anava

Typewritten Text

See ATTACHMENT D

anava

Typewritten Text

N/A

anava

Typewritten Text

N/A

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

N/A

anava

Typewritten Text

See ATTACHMENT E

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

See ATTACHMENT F

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

See ATTACHMENT G

anava

Typewritten Text

See Attachment H

anava

Rectangle


anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT A

anava

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT B- PHOTOGRAPHS

8TH STREET PROJECT/HARDING, WILSON, AND CENTRAL UNION SCHOOLS

Family runs from oncoming traffic. Crosswalks and curb extension proposed at

8th Street and Wensley Avenue will shorten the crossing distance (currently 80-feet).

Mother and daughter cross at 8th Street Wensley Avenue intersection as traffic approaches. Curb extensions and crosswalks are proposed at this location in

front of Harding Elementary School.


Student from Wilson Junior High attempts to cross at the intersection of 8th Street

and Hamilton Avenue. Curb extensions and rapid flashing beacons are proposed at this location to improve student and driver visibility and shorten

crossing distance.

Cyclist riding on the wrong side of the road. Striping of Class II Bike Lanes will

deter cyclists from riding on the wrong side of the road.


Students riding on sidewalks. Striping of Class II Bike Lanes will provide a

designated lane on the roadway and provide a safe environment.

New ADA ramp proposed at northeast corner of 8th Street and Park Avenue to

improve accessibility and walkability to this location.


8TH STREET PROJECT/MCKINLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

A speed monitor would be located at this segment, in front of McKinley

Elementary to inform drivers of their speed.

1ST STREET PROJECT/WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Rapid flashing beacon proposed in front of Washington Elementary School,

located the intersection 1st Street and State Street.


PHOTOGRAPHS

COMBINED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SR2S PLAN

Imperial Avenue/SR86, the City’s main thoroughfare lacks sidewalks. The right of way is used as a drain. The Plan would assist us in prioritizing the construction of

sidewalks along Imperial Avenue which is widely used by the community. The site abuts medical offices which are used by the elderly.

The railroad tracks are crossed by students on their way to school or to the park.

The Plan would allow us to prioritize the project and coordinate with the Union Pacific railroad company.


Students cross railroad tracks to Kennedy Middle School, the pathway lacks

sidewalks.


8TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS PLAN

1ST STREET IMPROVEMENTS PLAN

EL CENTRO PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLIST

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

ATTACHMENT C

-PRELIMINARY PLAN-

CROSS-SECTION A-A



anava

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT E

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Oval

anava

Rectangle

#Su

rvey

Que

stio

ns

Des. Garden

Harding

Hedrick

M.L.K.

Lincoln

McKinley

Sunflower

Washington

St. Mary's

Kennedy

Wilson

Central

Southwest

Adult/Oasis

Resu

lts- O

f tho

se w

ho re

spon

ded

to th

e Su

rvey

.2

Scho

ol in

tere

sted

in c

olla

bora

ting

with

City

.1

11

11

11

11

11

11

110

0% In

tere

sted

in c

olla

bor

atin

g w

ith C

ity.

3a I

mpr

ovem

ents

to e

xist

ing

cros

swal

ks

with

enh

ance

d fe

atur

es.

01

11

11

11

11

11

10

86%

wa

nt im

pro

vem

ents

to e

xist

ing

cros

swa

lks w

ith

enha

nced

fea

ture

s.

3bD

evel

opm

ent o

f new

bik

eway

s and

w

alkw

ays.

00

10

10

11

01

01

00

43%

wa

nt n

ew b

ikew

ays

and

wa

lkw

ays

3cIm

prov

emen

ts o

r rep

airs

to e

xist

ing

bike

way

s and

wal

kway

s. 0

01

01

00

10

11

10

043

% w

ant

imp

rove

men

ts to

exi

stin

g b

ikew

ays

and

w

alk

wa

ys

3dIn

stal

latio

n of

traf

fic c

ontro

l dev

ices

11

11

11

11

01

11

11

93%

wa

nt in

sta

llatio

n of

tra

ffic

cont

rol d

evic

es

3eEd

ucat

ion

prog

ram

s to

incr

ease

bi

cycl

ing

and

wal

king

01

10

10

11

01

11

00

57%

wa

nt e

duc

atio

n p

rogr

am

s to

incr

ease

bic

yclin

g a

nd

wa

lkin

g

3fSc

hool

cro

ssin

g gu

ard

train

ing

10

10

10

01

10

10

00

43%

wa

nt sc

hool

cro

ssin

g gu

ard

tra

inin

g

675

% o

f stu

dent

s elig

ible

for f

ree

or

redu

ced

lunc

h1

10

11

11

10

11

11

079

% o

f sch

ools

said

75%

of t

heir

stud

ents

are

elig

ible

for

red

uced

or f

ree

lunc

h

7D

oes y

our s

choo

l hav

e a

desig

nate

d ro

ute

or p

ath

to sc

hool

00

01

01

00

00

10

10

71%

of s

choo

ls d

o no

t ha

ve a

des

igna

ted

rout

e or

pa

th to

sc

hool

8Ar

e yo

u in

tere

sted

in c

reat

ing

a de

signa

ted

safe

rout

e to

scho

ol1

11

00

01

11

10

10

190

% o

f sch

ools

who

don

't h

ave

a sa

fe ro

ute

to sc

hool

, in

dic

ate

d th

ey w

ant

ed o

ne

SCHO

OL

Dese

rt G

arde

n - 1

900

S. 6

th S

treet

Hard

ing

- 950

S. 7

th S

treet

Hedr

ick

- 550

S. W

ater

man

Ave

.

Req

uest

ed a

pa

trol o

ffice

r on

6th

Stre

et in

the

mor

ning

and

a p

olic

e of

ficer

on

Drif

twoo

d S

treet

in

the

afte

rnoo

n.

Rep

orte

d th

e su

bje

ct in

ters

ectio

n ha

s no

cros

swa

lk. L

ast

yea

r an

emp

loye

e w

as h

it b

y a

ca

r.

5. L

ocat

ion

4. P

roje

ct N

eed

6th

St. a

nd D

riftw

ood

St.

Cro

ssw

alk

on

Ora

nge

Ave

. and

W

ate

rma

n St

., sid

ewa

lks a

long

scho

ol

per

imet

er

Cro

ssw

alk

acr

oss t

he c

orne

r of O

rang

e A

ve. a

nd W

ate

rma

n St

. are

une

ven,

lea

ds t

o se

ttlin

g of

w

ate

r, p

udd

les a

ttra

ct m

osq

uito

es. F

lood

ing

issue

s at W

ate

rma

n St

. and

Ora

nge

Ave

(ina

deq

uate

d

rain

age

). Bu

cklin

g sid

ewa

lks a

long

per

imet

er o

f sch

ool.

Dia

gona

l pa

rkin

g in

fron

t of s

choo

ls ca

uses

ha

zard

ous c

ond

ition

s. W

ant

s pol

ice

pa

trol a

lso.

Inte

rsec

tion

of 8

th S

t. a

nd W

ensle

y A

ve.


SCHO

OL

5. L

ocat

ion

4. P

roje

ct N

eed

M.L

.K. -

195

0 Vi

lla S

t.

Linco

ln -

200

N. 1

2th

St.

McK

inle

y - 1

177

N. 8

th S

t.

Sunf

low

er -

2450

Mai

n St

.

Was

hing

ton

- 223

S. 1

st S

t.

St. M

ary'

s - 7

95 L

a Br

uche

rie R

d.

Kenn

edy

- 900

N. 6

th S

t.

Wils

on -

600

S. W

ilson

Ave

.

Cen

tral -

1001

Brig

hton

Ave

.

Sout

hwes

t - 2

001

Oco

tillo

Dr.

Adu

lt C

entra

l/Oas

is - 1

302

S. 3

rd S

t.

Req

uest

ed im

pro

vem

ents

to e

xist

ing

cros

swa

lk c

ross

ings

, dev

elop

men

t of n

ew b

ikew

ays

, im

pro

vem

ents

or r

epa

irs to

exi

stin

g b

ikew

ays

and

wa

lkw

ays

, ins

talla

tion

of tr

affi

c co

ntro

l dev

ices

, a

nd e

duc

atio

n p

rogr

am

s.

Req

uest

ed to

ha

ve th

e cr

ossw

alk

nea

r 22n

d S

t. in

sta

lled

with

mor

e sig

ns a

nd li

ghts

(sim

ilar t

o D

MV

). A

lso, w

ould

be

nice

to h

ave

mor

e st

reet

sign

s to

ale

rt d

river

s. In

form

ed fe

w st

uden

ts h

ave

b

een

hit i

n th

e cr

ossw

alk

are

a b

y ve

hicl

es a

nd n

umer

ous c

lose

ca

lls.

Info

rmed

Ros

s Ave

. and

3rd

stre

et is

a b

usy

inte

rsec

tion

with

no

traffi

c sig

nals

or st

op si

gns o

n Ro

ss

Ave

. Stu

den

ts te

nd to

jay

wa

lk o

nce

they

lea

ve sc

hool

and

it is

a b

ig h

aza

rd. C

ars

turn

ing

off o

f 3r

d S

treet

ont

o Ro

ss A

venu

e a

re tr

ave

lling

at h

igh

spee

ds.

Req

uest

ed c

ross

wa

lk w

ith fl

ash

ing

light

s sim

ilar t

o D

MV

. Pa

rkin

g is

an

issue

by

thei

r sch

ool a

nd re

que

sted

if th

ey c

an

pa

rk a

nd th

e ol

d B

arr

Lum

ber

bui

ldin

g or

by

the

stor

age

faci

lity.

A c

ross

wa

lk o

n 3r

d S

treet

and

Yuc

ca A

ve. w

ould

be

help

ful.

Cro

ssw

alk

by

Pre-

Scho

ol is

nee

ded

as t

here

isn'

t one

.

Imp

eria

l Ave

., Br

ight

on A

ve.,

Hol

t Ave

., 10

th S

treet

22nd

St.

and

Oco

tillo

Ave

.

Ross

Ave

. , 3

rd S

t.

8th

Stre

et

Lotu

s Ave

. and

W. M

ain

St.

Non

e sp

ecifi

ed. S

urro

und

ing

stee

ts

are

: nor

th- E

. Ma

in S

t, so

uth-

Brig

hton

A

ve.,

east

- Fa

irfie

ld D

r., w

est-

1st S

t.

Req

uest

ed li

ghts

at t

he p

edes

tria

n cr

ossin

g. (A

ssum

ing

light

s suc

h a

s tho

se b

y D

MV

?) M

entio

ned

th

at s

tud

ents

wa

lk o

n th

e d

irt si

de

of L

a B

ruch

erie

(Ass

umin

g w

ant

s sid

ewa

lks a

long

La

Bru

cher

ie?)

Rep

orte

d d

ang

erou

s con

diti

ons "

nea

r miss

es" a

cros

s the

stre

et o

n 12

th S

t. a

nd o

n W

ilson

St.,

b

ehin

d L

inco

ln S

choo

lRe

que

sted

inst

alla

tion

of sp

eed

mon

itors

in fr

ont o

f sch

ool,

simila

r to

Ha

rdin

g Sc

hool

, res

trip

ing

of

cros

swa

lks,

and

in p

ark

ing

lot.

Req

uest

ed b

ike

lane

strip

ing,

and

cro

ssw

alk

sign

age

.

La B

ruch

erie

Rd

. and

Wa

term

an

Ave

.

6th

St.,

Woo

dw

ard

Ave

., Eu

clid

Ave

., A

da

ms A

ve.

Non

e sp

ecifi

ed. S

urro

und

ing

stre

ets

are

: nor

th- W

. Hol

t Ave

., so

uth-

H

am

ilton

Ave

., ea

st- W

ilson

St.,

wes

t- S.

Im

per

ial A

ve.

Ass

umin

g 18

th S

t. a

nd V

illa A

ve.,

La

Bruc

herie

Rd

.

12th

St.

And

Wils

on S

t. (b

ehin

d sc

hool

)

Req

uest

ed im

pro

vem

ents

to e

xist

ing

cros

swa

lk c

ross

ing

with

enh

anc

ed fe

atu

res.

Info

rmed

of

risky

/ha

zard

ous c

ond

ition

s alo

ng L

a B

ruch

erie

Rd

. and

Wa

term

an

Ave

.

Req

uest

ed im

pro

vem

ent o

f sid

ewa

lks,

safe

ty a

roun

d tr

ain

cro

ssin

g, sa

fety

sign

s, sid

ewa

lk ra

mp

s, sa

fe/b

icyc

le/s

kate

boa

rd/w

alk

ing

pa

ths,

stre

et m

ark

ings

.

Req

uest

ed im

pro

vem

ents

to e

xist

ing

cros

swa

lk c

ross

ings

, im

pro

vem

ents

or r

epa

irs to

exi

stin

g b

ikew

ays

and

wa

lkw

ays

, ins

talla

tion

of tr

affi

c co

ntro

l dev

ices

, ed

uca

tion

pro

gra

ms,

scho

ol

cros

sing

gua

rd tr

ain

ing.

Req

uest

ed im

pro

vem

ents

to e

xist

ing

cros

swa

lks w

ith e

nha

nced

fea

ture

s, d

evel

opm

ent o

f new

b

ikew

ays

, and

wa

lkw

ays

, ins

talla

tion

of tr

affi

c co

ntro

l dev

ices

, ed

uca

tion

pro

gra

ms.

Req

uest

ed im

pro

vem

ents

to e

xist

ing

cros

swa

lks w

ith e

nha

nced

fea

ture

s, d

evel

opm

ent o

f new

b

ikew

ays

, and

wa

lkw

ays

, ins

talla

tion

of tr

affi

c co

ntro

l dev

ices

, ed

uca

tion

pro

gra

ms,

scho

ol

cros

sing

gua

rd tr

ain

ing.




McKinley Elementary School 1177 N. 8th St

El Centro, CA 92243

Phone: 760-352-3225 Fax 760-353-2858

Principal: Patti Weeks

District Administration: Jon LeDoux – SUPERINTENDENT Renato Montaño – ASSOC. SUPERINTENDENT Susan Fitzpatrick – ASST. SUPERINTENDENT, ADMIN.

Date: March 7, 2014 To: A. Nava From: Patti Weeks, Principal McKinley Elementary School Re: Proposal for City of El Centro Due to our high student & other pedestrian traffic on 8th Street and past motor vehicle traffic problems, we are requesting the following:

1. Improvements to existing Crosswalks with enhanced features: a. Signage on the crosswalk in front of McKinley both on 8th Street and in

the parking lot crosswalk. b. Repaint all striping on and around the 8th street crosswalk and

parking lot crosswalk along with parking striping. c. Extra Signage on the school fence entering the drop off zone on 8th

street. 2. Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and

bicyclists: a. Installation of electronic speed device going both ways on 8th in order

to let motorist know how fast they are traveling in front of/close to McKinley Elementary. Please note: These devices are located on 8th street in front of Harding Elementary School.

b. Installation of crosswalk signs within the crosswalk.



City of El Centro

Active Transportation Grant Application

Safe Routes to School Questionnaire Form

Please E-mail OR Mail this form by March 21, 2014:

Email: [email protected] Mailing Address: El Centro Community Development Department c/o Adriana C. Nava, Associate Planner 1275 W Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243

If you need assistance completing this form, please contact Adriana C. Nava at (760) 337-4869 or via email at [email protected]. (

I. NameofSchool: Wi\st>h \}(. th~h ~c:hro Name of Contact Person: tv\A-yLJ ~ T- Af:Y.br I Z-Title: _..:...:.....Yrr~\f\:....::c.t:::..:'~~~_:__ _____ _

Email: ml1mbr12-(£2e:.c.e.=d. D r-8 2. Is your school interested in collaborating with the City to request grant funding from the California

Department of Transportation (Caltrans)? U?Yes ONo

3. IfYes, what types of projects are you interested in obtaining funding for? (More tha11 one check box call be S)!lected.)

I!V'" Improvements to existing crosswalk crossings with enhanced features. D Development of new bikeways and walkways such as sidewalks, curb ramps, and striping of

_70adways that improve mobility, access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. I»" Improvements or repairs to existing bikeways and walkways, which improve mobility,

access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways. • Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the primary goal of

extending the service life of the facility. riJ/)nstallation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. cg./ Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non-infrastructure

investments that demonstrate effectiveness in increasing active transportation, including the following:

• Conducting bicycle and pedestrian safety education programs. • Development and publishing of community walking and biking maps, including

school route/travel plans. nv'Schoo/ crossing guard training. *This will require a Memorandum of Understanding with

City.* 4. Identify the project need (i.e. risk/ hazardous conditions, increase in safety, potential to increase

walking and bicycling, etc.). It is important to discuss any accidents that have occurred as a result of any infrastructure deficiencies. Please attach pages as necessary.

5. 6.

7.

8.

Identify the project(s) location(s).--::---:::----:--:-:---:-=-----------~~-::-:::= Arep% of your students eligible for free or reduced lunch? RECEIVED ~es DNo Doe~our school have a designated route or path to school? [ip(es DNo If no, are you interested in creating a designated safe route to school? DYes ONo

**Titallk You For Your Cooperation and Participation!**

MAR 0 5 ZU'I4

PLANNiNG DEPT. CITY OF EL CE!NJRO





City of El Centro


Safe Routes to School Questionnair~IVED

Please E-mail OR Mail this form by March 21,2014: FEB 2 8 2014 Email: anava@cityofelcentro. org Mailing Address: El Centro Community Development Department c/o Adriana C. Nava, Associate Planner

PLANMNG DEPT. CITY OF EL Cf!NT~

1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243

If you need assistance completing this form, please contact Adriana C. Nava at (760) 337-4869 or via email at [email protected].

1. Name of School: QQ5er-t Gar-deb

2.

3.

4.

5. 6.

7.

8.

Name of Contact Person: ~h~ Brand-enbexJ Title: Pr ,' Y\ C.\ -poJ Email: ~br1lfhflem@ e~c.=e;sd ·frDj Is your school interested in collaborating with the City to request grant funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)? li(lYes DNo

If Yes, what types of projects are you interested in obtaining funding for? (More than one check box can be selected.)

0 Improvements to existing crosswalk crossings with enhanced features. 0 Development of new bikeways and walkways such as sidewalks, curb ramps, and striping of

roadways that improve mobility, access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. 0 Improvements or repairs to existing bikeways and walkways, which improve mobility,

access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways. • Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the primary goal of

extending the service life of the facility. ~ Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. 0 Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non-infrastructure


• Conducting bicycle and pedestrian safoty education programs. • Development and publishing of community walking and biking maps, including

school route/travel plans. til School crossing guard training. *This will require a Memorandum of Understanding with

City.* Identify the project need (i.e. risk/ hazardous conditions, increase in safety, potential to increase walking and bicycling, etc.). It is important to discuss any accidents that have occurred as a result of any infrastructure deficiencies. Please attach Rflges as necessary.

1f tvou!d 6e Ma,t/ !JrmebYlti/ tl' we CottW /;aoe. CU

~r,lfa,~o. In ..f}J-e_ /)I!J h ..Bilcotlr~f!e jJt?rt!h ':> jJic 1/?::j' ¥ 6. tt :en !1' f-o Identify the project(s) location(s) -/iJ/Jow-t)-f[/qL».£. WR UJt?tpjr/ CJ1Jij--L2eet( 1-J/J Are 75% of your students eligible for free or reduced lunch? J"f//,/JdY'-1 a /i3~d6!¥v ec:zc A ld58{; ~Yes DNo -,rgr t?ktd o>o ~ U tm_. ' iA Does your school have a designated route or path to school? /J?ol"IJ h . )7J~1 " t::O ;)2,. ~ DYes ~No ;_~(! _ /Jnu /10 //JJ)7Ut"eJ If no, are you interested in creating a designated safe route to school? / Yl 1;1-e_. O-:iltfY' f?Otj/), J&Yes DNo

**Thank You For Your Cooperation and Participation!** City of El Centro Pedestrian and Bicyclist Improvement Project Page 48


City of El Centro




Email: anava(ii),citvofelcentro. org Mailing Address: E/ Centro Community Development Department c/o Adriana C. Nava, Associate Planner 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243


Name of School: 5'ul) f' ( OLJ fr (; ( f> tiL1 C: /J ·f-or y )' C ~ o D { I.

Name of Contact Person: /VIcr]t / h/' ( /r~ Title: -~<........:r_t,_~...:....:.c..c..lp~-=Q::c......:../ ____ _ '1 I

Email: -~&L..:....:..:R!Lff!....L..JfJ~~~~=-~e~c~P_).L..._4~, &_r-jqL.._ ____________ _ I /

2. Is your school interested in collaborating with the City to request grant funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)? ~Yes DNo

3. If Yes, what types of projects are you interested in obtaining funding for? (More than one check box can be selected.)

IKJ Improvements to existing crosswalk crossings with enhanced features. ~ Development of new bikeways and walkways such as sidewalks, curb ramps, and striping of

roadways that improve mobility, aCCf!SS, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. 0 Improvements or repairs to existing bikeways and walkways, which improve mobility,

access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways. • Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the prim01y goal of

extending the service life of the facility. l:la Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. [tJ Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non-infrastructure



school route/travel plans. D School crossing guard training. *This will require a Memorandum of Understanding with

City.* 4. Identify the project need (i.e. risk/ hazardous conditions, increase in safety, potentia/to increase

walking and bicycling, etc.). It is important to discuss any accidents that have occurred as a result of

5. 6.

7.

8.

any infrastructure deficiencies. P~ase attach pages as necessary. , l/lcc~q~ '17 Qf-t"'f. ..;:. (j-fto.,t-/Ct'( t/l('rt='t~('e

Identify the project(s) location(s) t..J, /VIol/? Sf , £-o tv~ I

Are 75% of your students eligible for free or reduced lunch? lijYes DNo Does your school have a designated route or path to school? IZ!Yes lXINo If no, are you interested in creating a designated safe route to school? rg]Yes DNo

REC&IVID

MAR 24 2014

PLANf'..~..NG DEPT. **Timnk You For Your Cooperation and Participation!** CITY OF EL CE!NJPtO



mcastillo

Typewritten Text

Kennedy Middle School

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

Michael CastilloPrincipal

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

[email protected]

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

Improve sidewalks, safety around train crossing, safety signs, sidewalk ramps, safe biycle/skateboard/walking paths, street markings

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

6th street, Woodward, Euclid, Adams

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

mcastillo

Typewritten Text

X

06-MAR-2014 07:08 -/o:~ 1-\d,-r\~

760 From:760

Na..V'""-- '1f-

o\ {3~

City of El Centro



Please E-mail OR Mail this f2rm by March 21.2014:

Email: anava~elcentrg. org Mailing Address: £1 Centro Community Development Department c/o Adriana C. Nava, Associate Planner 1275 W Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243

If you need assistance completing this form, please contact Adriana C. Nava at (760) 337-4869 or via email at

a~~va~~t:::~;~::~:~----~---c-~--~~---e3b---~-----~--~~~~---~--~ _______ \ ____________________ __

2.

3.

4_

5. 6.

7.

8.

Name of Contact Person: CrA-;'1 l{o"'- Title: A1~+ · Yrtn. c..'·P~ c 11 a"'- @ c.~l:r J. tt-e./f- "'*1(po :33 lo f../ I 0/ o,.,. 3Jto- '119 3 Email:

Is your school interested in collaborating with the City to request grant funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)? }xlYes ONo

If Yes, what types of projects are you interested in obtaining funding for? (More than one check box can be selected.)

)( Improvements to existing crosswalk crossings with enhanced features. 0 Development ofnew bikeways and walkways such as sidewallcs, curb ramps, and stripi/zg of


access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways.

Preventative maintenance qf bikeways and walkways with the primaty goal of extending the service life of the facility.

h( Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. D Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non-infrastructure


• Conducting bicycle and pedestrian safety education programs. Development and publishing of community walking and biking maps, including school route/travel plans.

0 School crossing guard training *This will require a Memorandum of Understanding with 0~* '

Identify the project need (i.e. risk/ hazardous conditions, increase in safety, potential to increase walking and bicycling, etc.). It is important to discuss any accidents that have occurred as a result of any infrastructprr deficiencies. Please attach pages as necessary. tiJ L 1 11 • L ® w C!!.. w.,.-t.A ' '\tsL ~ ~ ~ cro-ss...,_, \t.. ~ .;;~ "Sru..-T ll\.J-ta.&JI- ~ ,fT'-,

MCH"e. s I • ..,J- It . ·ft '""' r t..... -h fl..e._ c s w .... l (L . D~v t:..t--f,.,._.~,..f:J /e... - A I io wowo- II'\. I ~ to fM.D~ 5 ·~OJ Q...p~ec~US-ldenfify the project(s) location(s) G-.,., ~,_//; ~OJ. lillo(9 + Or,.9 n llo Are 75% of your students eligible for free or reduced lunch? P{Yes DNo Does your school have a designated route or path to school? ~Yes ONo If no, are you interested in creating a designated safe route to school? DYes DNo


City of El Centro-·· ·



Please E-mail OR Mail this form bv March 21, 2014:

Email: anava(ii),cityo(elcentro. org Mailing Address: El Centro Community Development Department do Adriana C. Nava, Associate Planner 1275 W MainStreet; E!Centro, CA 92243


Name of School: -~c=. €.'-'--'1'\'-'-.f\'i'-"-a'-'-l---"'-'ll=vtc.:::ro'-'--(l-=-------<I,A'-'-d~u:..LH"--· __:$,7 ("""'J'-"1c=)C)~I ----,-----1.

Name of Contact Person: Tts h Tho M. p s {) n Title: ~\ V) c t p~ I . Email:.... ± + hPVVL-Q ~?!':' ®:. C1 ~k,£~t;:;{, Yl~t

2. Is your school interested in collaborating with the City to request grant funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)? .EsYes DNo

3. If Yes, what types ofprojects are you interested in obtaining funding for? (More titan one checA box can he selected.)

0 Improvements to existing crosswalk crossings with enhancedfeatures. 0 Development of new bikeways and walkways such as side·walks, curb ramps, and striping of


access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways. • Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the primary goal of'

. extending the service life of the facility. ~ Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists ... 0 Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non-ir?fi·astructure


• Conducting bicycle and pedestrian safety education programs. • Development and publishing of community ·walking and biking maps, including

school route/travel plans. D School crossing guard training *This will require a Memorandum of Understanding tvith

City.* 4. Identify the project need (i.e. risk! hazardous conditions, increase in safety, potential to increase

walking and bicycling, etc.). It is important to discuss any accidents that have occurred as a result of any infi·astructure deficiencies. Please attach pages as necessary.

5. 6.

Identify the project(s) location(s) ~OSS c-4-- Tit \'('d Are 75% of your students eligible for free or reduced lunch? DYes DNo

7. Does your school have a designated route or path to school? DYes .121No

Si. titJn ·'Third -.y·1tur~

8. If no, are you interested in creating a designated safe route to school? ®Yes DNo

**Thank You For Your Cooperation and Participation!**


Active Transportation Grant Application Question #4

Desert Oasis High School/Central Union Adult School is located on the corner of Ross and Third Street.

This is a very busy intersection with no traffic signals or stop signs on Ross Ave that assist our students

with crossing over Ross. The nearest crosswalk is on the corner of Ross and 41h St. and our students tend

to just jay walk once they leave school and this is a very big hazard. Cars are going very fast both

directions on Ross. In addition, the cars turning off of Third onto Ross, tend to go really fast, to beat the

oncoming traffic- causing a traffic hazard. I know in the past there have been incidents in this area, but

thankfully in the three years I have been here, nothing serious has happened. If we had a crosswalk

with one of the flashing hazard lights like they put out on Imperial Ave by the DMV I think that would be

wonderful. However, anything would be nice.

The above mentioned crosswalk would also help with an issue I have with the Adult School students that

I oversee. Our parking area is very small and when we have all our classes in session, parking is a

premium and so they have to park on the street. It would be nice if they could park across Ross at the

old Barr Lumber building or even by the storage facility. But because ofthey are afraid to cross the

street, they park down Third Street. For the evening class students, it is very dark on Third Stand it is a

little frightening to have to walk down the street at 8 pm when classes get out. If they could park across

the street, where there is more lighting I think they would use that instead.

In addition, a crosswalk across Third St on the corner of Third and Yucca would also be helpful. Because

the Adult Ed students need to park down Third St., they need to cross that street and a crosswalk would

be nice.

I would also like to put a good word in for the preschool that is also on our lot, but has a separate

entrance. Because they too have a small parking lot, the teachers and sometimes parents need to park

on the street. There is no crosswalk there and if they could get one in that area, I am sure they too

would be appreciative. The DOHS student could also use that crosswalk when walking to school.

Any assistance you can give us would be very appreciative. These are only my ideas and I do not know if

I have included the correct language in expressing my concerns, but I wrote it like I see it. It does make

me nervous when I see students jaywalking and I can assure you that I will do what I can to get the

students to use the crosswalks if they are available to them. If you should have any questions please

feel free to contact me at 76-336-4587 or by email at [email protected]



City of El Centro




Email: anava@cityofelcentro. org Mailing Address: El Centro Community Development Department c/o Adriana C. Nava, Associate Planner 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243

If you need assistance completing this form, please contact Adriana C. Nava at (760) 337-4869 or via email at

[email protected];:J ~~ ' 1:1~-- 1 {_

1. NameofSchool: --f/'~ 6:5 tJAm , NameofConmct ;:~ w;&Yfn~if31 Email: jl/ya_ U-fl1. '0) f!_uh S · n -e.._C

2.

3.

4.

5. 6.

7.

8.

Is your school interest.ed in collaborating with the City. to request graf!t funding from the C~lifomia . {)P.nartmentofTranspqrta~ion Caltrans)?_ L.J~ ~ f2L ~ 'io IL .. L r ij'P.s ONo 'fO a__~"?'? oJ ~_s ~ or . ~

~~ i-0/~ .. ~)~ 4'al ~ ' If Yes, what types of projects are you interested in obtaining funding for? (More tllan one clleck box can be selected.)

D Improvements to existing crosswalk crossings with enhanced features. 0 Development of new bikeways and walkways such as sidewalks, curb ramps, and striping of

roadways that improve mobility, access, or safoty for pedestrians and bicyclists. D Improvements or repairs to existing bikeways and walkways, which improve mobility,

access, or safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Elimination ofhazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways. • Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the primary goal of

extending the service life of the facility. D Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. 0 Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non-infrastructure



school route/travel plans. 0 School crossing guard training. *This will require a Memorandum of Understanding with

City.* Identify the project need (i.e. risk/ hazardous conditions, increase in safety, potentia/to increase walking and bicycling, etc.). It is important to discuss any accidents that have occurred as a result of any infrastructure deficiencies. Please attach pages as necessary.

Identify the project(s) location(s) ________ -:----------------Are 75% of your students eligible for free or reduced lunch? lives ONo Do~s your school have a designated route or path to school? DYes ~o

RECEIVED

MAR 0 4 2014 ~~?'are you interested in creating a designated safe route to school? Fes ONo PLANNING DEPT.

CITY OF EL CeNT~O **Titank You For Your Cooperation and Participation!**






DE ANZA MAGNET Richard Sanchez1530 S. Waterman 352-9811El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-8

DESERT GARDEN Kathy Brandenberg1900 S. 6th St. 352-2051El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

HARDING Juan Aguilera950 S. 7th St. 352-4791El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

HEDRICK Mary Joy Ceasar550 S. Waterman 352-4750El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

M. L. KING Linda Morse1950 Villa 337-6555El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

LINCOLN Teresa Ponce200 N. 12th St. 352-3060/3061El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

MCKINLEY Patricia Weeks1177 N. 8th St. 352-3225El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

SUNFLOWER Carl Phillips2450 Main St. 337-4890El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

B. T. WASHINGTON Karla Sigmond223 S. 1st St. 352-6611/6614 El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-6

KENNEDY MIDDLE Michael Castillo900 N. 6th St. 352-0444El Centro, CA 92243 Grades 7-8

WILSON JR. HIGH Maria Teresa Ambriz600 S. Wilson 352-5341El Centro, CA 92243 Grades 7-8

IMPERIAL VALLEY Jon LeDouxHOME SCHOOL ACADEMY (Superintendent)2370 Main St. 353-2860El Centro, CA 92243 Grades K-8

EL CENTRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT


CENTRAL UNION HIGH SCHOOL Mike Sterner

1001 Brighton Ave. 336-4300El Centro, CA 92243 Grades 9-12

SOUTHWEST HIGH SCHOOL Danette Morrell

2001 Ocotillo Drive 336-4100El Centro, CA 92243 Grades 9-12

DESERT OASIS HIGH SCHOOL Tracie Baughn

1302 S. 3rd Street 336-4555El Centro, CA 92243 Grades 9-12

CENTRAL UNION ADULT EDUCATION Tish Thompson

1302 S. 3rd Street 336-4544El Centro, CA 92243 GED Program

IMAGINE SCHOOL Freddie Villalon

1150 N. Imperial Ave. 592-7250El Centro, CA 92243 Grades 1-8

BALLINGTON ACADEMY William Anderson

1525 W. Main St. 353-0140El Centro, CA 92243 Grades 1-6

ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL Katia Chavez

795 La Brucherie Road 352-7285El Centro, CA 92243 Pre-K - 8

CENTRAL UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

EL CENTRO CHARTER SCHOOLS

RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS



anava

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT G- LETTERS OF SUPPORT

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text








ATTACHMENT H-1

Additional Schools Benefited by the Project

SCHOOL NAME & ADDRESS McKinley Elementary School, 1177 N. 8th Street, El Centro, CA 92243 County-District-School Code (CDS)

13631236008478

Total Student Enrollment

415

Percentage of students eligible for free or reduced meal programs

86.60 Percentage of students that currently walk or bike to school

20%

Approximately # of students living along school route proposed for involvement

3,486

Project distance from primary or middle school

20-feet

SCHOOL NAME & ADDRESS Washington Elementary School, 223 S. 1st Street, El Centro, CA 92243 County-District-School Code (CDS)

13631236008486


426



20%


426


20 feet

SCHOOL NAME & ADDRESS Wilson Junior High, 600 S. Wilson Street, El Centro, CA 92243 County-District-School Code (CDS)

13631236008494


689



25%


3,486


0.23 miles

SCHOOL NAME & ADDRESS Central Union High School, 1001 Brighton Avenue, El Centro, CA 92243 County-District-School Code (CDS)

13631151333004


1,877



30%


3,486


0.12 miles


DTP-0001 (Revised July 2013)

End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone)

CEDocument TypeCirculate Draft Environmental Document

ADA Notice

06/01/1709/30/17

Begin Closeout Phase

Element

[email protected]

Supports Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Goals Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions

City of El CentroPurpose and Need See page 2

Project Benefits See page 2Project will create a Class II bikeway on a city arterial street, will reduce traffic speeds near schools, will reduce pedestrian crossing distance in the street and make it safer to walk and bike to school and nearby parks and sports complex.

Phone

(760) 337-5182

Includes Bike/Ped ImprovementsIncludes ADA Improvements

MPO ID TCRP No.

For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

N/A03/01/1611/01/16

09/01/16

E-mail Address

Project Study Report Approved

Component

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ï DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST

Date: 5/7/14

General Instructions

8th Street between Aurora Avenue and Rose Avenue in the City of El Centro. Installation of missing sidewalks, ADA compliant curb returns, curb extensions at designated crosswalks, installation of rectangular rapid flash beacons (RRFB) warning system at designated crosswalks, slurry of street and re-striping to establish Class II bicycle lane. In addition, RRFB at 1st and State Avenue.

MPO

Location, Project Limits, Description, Scope of Work See page 2City of El Centro Pedestrian & Bicyclist Improvement Project

PA&ED

09/01/15

06/01/17

03/01/15

Implementing AgencyCity of El CentroCity of El CentroCity of El Centro

Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase

ATP grant will allow El Centro to commission a combined ATP and safe routes to school plan; none currently exists. Project will provide sidewalks, ADA ramps and curb extensions in 8th street, a four lane arterial street. The street serves as vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle route. Currently a Class III route proposed to be upgraded to a Class II route. Curb extensions will reduce traffic speed and make it safer for school children from elementary to middle schools fronting 8th Street.

N/ADraft Project Report

Route/Corridor

02/01/15N/A

ProposedN/A

Project Milestone

District

Project Manager/Contact

IMP

PPNO

County Project Sponsor/Lead AgencyCity of El Centro

EA

PM Bk PM Ahd11

Project ID

End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone)Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone)

PS&E

Construction

Abraham Campos

End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report)

End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone)Begin Design (PS&E) PhaseEnd Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone)Begin Right of Way Phase

Right of Way

SCAG

Project Title

New Project


AT

TA

CH

ME

NT

H-3

Cal

En

viro

Scr

een

Res

ult

s –

El C

entr

o, C

alif

orn

ia (

To

p 1

0%)

So

urc

e <h

ttp://

oehh

a.m

aps.

arcg

is.c

om/a

pps/

Sto

ryte

lling

Sw

ipe/

inde

x.ht

ml?

appi

d=a3

e368

1906

aa41

b09f

6853

9b0c

adee

50&

web

ma

p=b9

9ecc

24d3

794b

dd84

6fe3

8d0b

8f7a

20#>


DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Surveywebsite in the Data and Documentation section.

Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American CommunitySurvey website in the Methodology section.

Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's PopulationEstimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns andestimates of housing units for states and counties.

Subject El Centro city, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

EMPLOYMENT STATUS

Population 16 years and over 30,991 +/-537 30,991 (X) In labor force 18,992 +/-593 61.3% +/-1.9 Civilian labor force 18,980 +/-591 61.2% +/-1.9 Employed 15,676 +/-620 50.6% +/-1.8 Unemployed 3,304 +/-482 10.7% +/-1.6 Armed Forces 12 +/-17 0.0% +/-0.1 Not in labor force 11,999 +/-695 38.7% +/-1.9

Civilian labor force 18,980 +/-591 18,980 (X) Percent Unemployed (X) (X) 17.4% +/-2.4

Females 16 years and over 16,212 +/-467 16,212 (X) In labor force 8,851 +/-442 54.6% +/-2.6 Civilian labor force 8,851 +/-442 54.6% +/-2.6 Employed 7,398 +/-452 45.6% +/-2.7

Own children under 6 years 3,984 +/-386 3,984 (X) All parents in family in labor force 2,465 +/-342 61.9% +/-6.0

Own children 6 to 17 years 8,400 +/-474 8,400 (X) All parents in family in labor force 5,599 +/-481 66.7% +/-5.0

COMMUTING TO WORK

Workers 16 years and over 15,273 +/-604 15,273 (X) Car, truck, or van -- drove alone 11,705 +/-572 76.6% +/-2.6 Car, truck, or van -- carpooled 1,945 +/-321 12.7% +/-2.0 Public transportation (excluding taxicab) 154 +/-72 1.0% +/-0.5 Walked 381 +/-135 2.5% +/-0.9 Other means 227 +/-117 1.5% +/-0.8 Worked at home 861 +/-257 5.6% +/-1.6

Mean travel time to work (minutes) 18.7 +/-1.2 (X) (X)

OCCUPATION

Civilian employed population 16 years and over 15,676 +/-620 15,676 (X)

1 of 5 03/25/2014


anava

Highlight

anava

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT H-4- CENSUS DATA

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Rectangle

Subject El Centro city, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

Management, business, science, and arts occupations 4,491 +/-379 28.6% +/-2.5

Service occupations 3,882 +/-428 24.8% +/-2.4 Sales and office occupations 3,658 +/-364 23.3% +/-2.1 Natural resources, construction, and maintenanceoccupations

1,978 +/-321 12.6% +/-1.9

Production, transportation, and material movingoccupations

1,667 +/-315 10.6% +/-2.0

INDUSTRY

Civilian employed population 16 years and over 15,676 +/-620 15,676 (X) Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 1,033 +/-215 6.6% +/-1.3

Construction 877 +/-200 5.6% +/-1.3 Manufacturing 632 +/-205 4.0% +/-1.3 Wholesale trade 377 +/-114 2.4% +/-0.7 Retail trade 1,959 +/-311 12.5% +/-1.9 Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 1,036 +/-230 6.6% +/-1.5 Information 178 +/-108 1.1% +/-0.7 Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental andleasing

643 +/-145 4.1% +/-0.9

Professional, scientific, and management, andadministrative and waste management services

951 +/-214 6.1% +/-1.4

Educational services, and health care and socialassistance

4,458 +/-346 28.4% +/-1.9

Arts, entertainment, and recreation, andaccommodation and food services

892 +/-221 5.7% +/-1.4

Other services, except public administration 624 +/-172 4.0% +/-1.1 Public administration 2,016 +/-341 12.9% +/-2.0

CLASS OF WORKER

Civilian employed population 16 years and over 15,676 +/-620 15,676 (X) Private wage and salary workers 9,623 +/-578 61.4% +/-3.1 Government workers 5,099 +/-530 32.5% +/-2.9 Self-employed in own not incorporated businessworkers

822 +/-213 5.2% +/-1.4

Unpaid family workers 132 +/-64 0.8% +/-0.4

INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2012 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS) Total households 13,006 +/-349 13,006 (X) Less than $10,000 1,331 +/-228 10.2% +/-1.7 $10,000 to $14,999 1,275 +/-222 9.8% +/-1.7 $15,000 to $24,999 2,062 +/-277 15.9% +/-2.1 $25,000 to $34,999 1,158 +/-196 8.9% +/-1.4 $35,000 to $49,999 1,530 +/-232 11.8% +/-1.7 $50,000 to $74,999 1,849 +/-245 14.2% +/-1.9 $75,000 to $99,999 1,441 +/-228 11.1% +/-1.7 $100,000 to $149,999 1,544 +/-220 11.9% +/-1.7 $150,000 to $199,999 493 +/-132 3.8% +/-1.0 $200,000 or more 323 +/-100 2.5% +/-0.8 Median household income (dollars) 41,418 +/-2,951 (X) (X) Mean household income (dollars) 58,796 +/-2,588 (X) (X)

With earnings 10,006 +/-372 76.9% +/-1.9 Mean earnings (dollars) 60,472 +/-2,788 (X) (X) With Social Security 3,606 +/-308 27.7% +/-2.3 Mean Social Security income (dollars) 14,201 +/-1,019 (X) (X) With retirement income 1,644 +/-195 12.6% +/-1.5 Mean retirement income (dollars) 26,082 +/-3,302 (X) (X)

With Supplemental Security Income 1,245 +/-229 9.6% +/-1.7 Mean Supplemental Security Income (dollars) 8,493 +/-1,151 (X) (X) With cash public assistance income 895 +/-182 6.9% +/-1.4

2 of 5 03/25/2014


anava

Highlight

anava

Highlight

anava

Highlight

anava

Rectangle

El Centro Poverty Level

Source: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml


http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml


anava

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT H-5- COLLISION DIAGRAM & ACCIDENT DATA

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Typewritten Text


anava

Rectangle


anava

Typewritten Text

anava

Rectangle


anava

Rectangle


anava

Rectangle


anava

Rectangle

AT

TA

CH

ME

NT

H-7

SC

HO

OL

DA

TA



Documents

CITY OF EL CENTRO Pedestrian Bicyclist Improvement Project Centro Final 2014 ATP... · 2016. 9. 28. · 8th Street improvement project would solve these issues and enhance pedestrian