Upload
fayre
View
30
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Water Supply Master Plan. City of Guelph Water Supply Master Plan Public Meeting #1 Presentation Tuesday March 8 th , 2005. Welcome/Introduction. Opening Remarks. 2. Agenda. Purpose of Today’s Meeting. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
City of GuelphWater Supply Master Plan
Public Meeting #1Presentation
Tuesday March 8th, 2005
Water Supply Master Plan
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
2
Welcome/Introduction
Opening Remarks
2
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
3
AgendaTIME DESCRIPTION
6:00 pm Open House – Registration and Refreshments
Opportunity for participants to view displays and meet informally with City staff and Consultant team
7:00 pm Welcome and Opening Remarks – City of Guelph
7:05 pm Meeting Purpose and Agenda Review – Dave Dilks, Facilitator
7:15 pm Introduction to City of Guelph Water Supply Master Plan - John Haasen, Earth Tech
1) Overview of Master Plan and Class EA Process
2) Existing Water Supply and Sources
3) Water Supply Issues and Options for the Future
A question and answer period will follow the presentation
8:00 pm Break
8:10 pm Roundtable Discussion – All
Goals and Results
Alternative Water Supply Options
Choosing Options for the Future
8:50 pm Roundtable Highlights and Plenary Discussion
9:25 pm Closing Remarks – City of Guelph
9:30 pm Adjourn
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
4
Purpose of Today’s Meeting To introduce the City of Guelph Water Supply Master Plan
project the public and stakeholders.
To identify their perspectives on key issues and opportunities associated with the WSMP.
To seek stakeholder feedback on draft problem statement; evaluation method and criteria; and “long list” of alternative solutions.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
5
Public Consultation and Communication
Public consultation and communication initiatives form a key component of this project
These initiatives are designed to:
Keep all stakeholders, agencies and the public informed and involved in determining how and when the City’s water supply system should be improved;
Incorporate the knowledge and insight of City of Guelph residents, stakeholders and businesses who are widely known for their interest in environmental issues and stewardship;
Exceed Class EA consultation requirements
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
6
Public Advisory Committee formation & meetings
Technical agency and Municipality workshops
Public meetings
Possible stakeholder meetings
Possible focus groups with high user groups
Meetings with City and Area Councils
Public Consultation
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
7
Communication Plan
Advertising and Public Service Announcements
Website
Project Newsletters (3)
Communications with agencies, municipalities and stakeholders
Events
• Launch event
• Possible Water forum
Speaking engagements
Media plan
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
8
Today’s Focus Class EA Phase 1 Purpose Statement – provides an
overview of the current water supply system, study background and the conclusion that improvements are required to meet current and projected future needs.
Class EA Phase 2 Alternative Solutions – identifies water supply alternatives, and evaluation framework including draft criteria and methodology.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
9
Master Plans are broad in scope. They focus on the analysis of a system, in this case water supply, for the purpose of outlining a framework for the provision of future works and development.
Master Planning Process
Specific projects recommended in a Master Plan are part of a larger management system and may be distributed geographically throughout the study area. The implementation of specific projects may occur over an extended time frame.
A Class EA Master Plan must at least satisfy the requirements of Phases 1 and 2 of the Class EA process (for the most part).
Master Plan will clearly define a “suite” of projects required to implement the plan over the planning period (2054). The listing will include:
• Project description/location
• Phasing-implementation schedule (triggers)
• Recommended Class EA Planning Schedule (i.e. Schedule B or Schedule C or Individual EA).
• Each project will contain an EA component.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
10
Master Planning Process cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
11
City relies exclusively on groundwater and has utilized groundwater as its primary source of water supply since 1879.
LO W LEVEL ZO NE
HI G H LEVEL ZO NE
Township of Guelph-Eramosa
Township of Puslinch
Township ofGuelph-Eramosa
Township ofPuslinch
YORK ROADYORK ROADYORK ROADYORK ROADYORK ROADYORK ROADYORK ROADYORK ROADYORK ROAD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
D
ARKELL RDARKELL RDARKELL RDARKELL RDARKELL RDARKELL RDARKELL RDARKELL RDARKELL RD
STONE ROADSTONE ROADSTONE ROADSTONE ROADSTONE ROADSTONE ROADSTONE ROADSTONE ROADSTONE ROAD
COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.COLLEGE AVE.
CLAIR ROADCLAIR ROADCLAIR ROADCLAIR ROADCLAIR ROADCLAIR ROADCLAIR ROADCLAIR ROADCLAIR ROAD
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
GO
RD
ON
ST
MALTBY ROADMALTBY ROADMALTBY ROADMALTBY ROADMALTBY ROADMALTBY ROADMALTBY ROADMALTBY ROADMALTBY ROAD
KORTRIGHTKORTRIGHTKORTRIGHTKORTRIGHTKORTRIGHTKORTRIGHTKORTRIGHTKORTRIGHTKORTRIGHT
EDIN
BU
RG
H R
DED
INB
UR
GH
RD
EDIN
BU
RG
H R
DED
INB
UR
GH
RD
EDIN
BU
RG
H R
DED
INB
UR
GH
RD
EDIN
BU
RG
H R
DED
INB
UR
GH
RD
EDIN
BU
RG
H R
D
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7
EASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROADEASTVIEW ROAD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
WAT
SON
RO
AD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
DVI
CTO
RIA
RD
VIC
TOR
IA R
D
SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.SPEEDVALE AVE.
WO
OLW
ICH
ST
REE
TW
OO
LWIC
H
STR
EET
WO
OLW
ICH
ST
REE
TW
OO
LWIC
H
STR
EET
WO
OLW
ICH
ST
REE
TW
OO
LWIC
H
STR
EET
WO
OLW
ICH
ST
REE
TW
OO
LWIC
H
STR
EET
WO
OLW
ICH
ST
REE
T
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
WOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROADWOODLAWN ROAD
WILLOW RDWILLOW RDWILLOW RDWILLOW RDWILLOW RDWILLOW RDWILLOW RDWILLOW RDWILLOW RD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
EDIN
BU
RG
H
RO
AD
PAISLEY RDPAISLEY RDPAISLEY RDPAISLEY RDPAISLEY RDPAISLEY RDPAISLEY RDPAISLEY RDPAISLEY RD
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
SIL
VER
CR
EEK
PK
WY
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HW
Y 6
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
HA
NLO
N E
XPR
ESSW
AY
FIFE RD.FIFE RD.FIFE RD.FIFE RD.FIFE RD.FIFE RD.FIFE RD.FIFE RD.FIFE RD.
WH
ITEL
AW R
DW
HIT
ELAW
RD
WH
ITEL
AW R
DW
HIT
ELAW
RD
WH
ITEL
AW R
DW
HIT
ELAW
RD
WH
ITEL
AW R
DW
HIT
ELAW
RD
WH
ITEL
AW R
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
DEL
MIR
A R
OA
D
HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7HWY 7
Arkell Springs Wells
B
Clythe WellBooster Station
Helmar
Burke
ICarter
Park
Emma
University
Dean
LOW ZONE
Water
Robertson
B
Membro
Queensdale
I
Paisley
Calico
B
HIGH ZONE
C
Downey
1
kilometres
0.50
City of GuelphWater Supply Sources
LEGEND
Production Well
Boosts Water from Low Pressure to Higher Pressure Zone
B
High/Low Pressure Zone Line
City Boundary
Figure 1
Current Water Supply System
Guelph’s water supply system includes production wells installed in the Guelph-Amabel bedrock aquifer and the Arkell Springs Ground collector system.
City has 23 production wells.
In 2004, seventeen municipal wells were operated on a near continuous basis.
The remainder were used intermittently or not at all due to needed repairs, poor water quality sampling results or were only operated as needed to address peak water demands.
Municipal Wells Steady State Capture Zones (2002)
Source: Township of Guelph-Eramosa Groundwater Study, Gartner Lee
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
13
Water Supply Master Plan provides a planning framework for development of City’s municipal water supply to accommodate future demands.
Builds on previous City water supply initiatives such as:
• Water Resources Evaluation (1990’s)
• Water Use and Awareness – Water Conservation and Efficiency Study (1998) which is already and will continue to be a major component of Water Supply Strategy
• Water Supply Strategy (1999)
The goal is the provision of an adequate and sustainable supply of water to meet the current and future needs of all customers.
Water Supply Issues and Options
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
14
Water Supply Issues and Options cont’d
October 20, 2003 Council Resolution “THAT the focus of the Water Supply Master Plan establish a sustainable water supply to regulate future growth”.
Review of demand scenarios to evaluate impacts on water supply.
Comprehensive Water Conservation/ Demand Management is a part of the current Water Supply Strategy.
Identify additional sources of water to supplement the existing supply in the 50+ year planning horizon (i.e. to at least 2054).
Developed as a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) and follows Class EA master plan provisions.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
15
Generally speaking, the existing water system is currently performing satisfactorily during average demand conditions
City still has capacity to handle the commitments for the future dwelling units currently registered or draft plan approved.
City also has additional water capacity to service near term.
Due to recent drought conditions and the provincial drought program, the system has experienced brief operational limitations due to insufficient water supply, particularly during dry summer months.
The current water supply system capacity is vulnerable to reductions as a result of climate change, degraded quality and regulatory constraints
Water Supply Issues and Options cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
16
Population growth estimates indicate that projected future water demands (residential and IC &I) will not be met by existing supply sources or via the continuation of water conservation/demand management initiatives.
The province’s recent “Places to Grow” Discussion Paper designated the City of Guelph as an “Urban Growth Centre”.
The City is in the process of developing a growth strategy in which water supply, wastewater, transportation, economic development and other factors are important components.
Water Supply Issues and Options cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
17
Municipal Act
City to Meet Servicing Requirements
Official Plan
• Population Projections
• Land Use/Community Development
Planning Act
City to Meet Available Land Requirements
Infrastructure Master Plans
• Water Supply
• Wastewater
• Transportation
• Others
Ontario Places To Grow Initiative
• Address impact of Urban Centre Designation
2005 City of Guelph Planning
Department Growth
Management Strategy Update
• Implementation
• Monitoring
• Adjustment as required
Water Supply Issues and Options cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
18
New regulatory requirements for water supply projects (e.g. Permit To Take Water and supporting studies) now require considerable lead time.
Future growth requirements will place additional demands on the existing water supply.
Future long-term economic growth of the City could be constrained by supply limitations.
Increased emphasis on limiting environmental impacts.
Water Supply Issues and Options cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
19
Guelph’s Water Demand vs Capacity
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Cu
bic
Met
res/
Day
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
Po
pu
lati
on
Supply Capacity Average Day Peak Day Population
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
20
Purpose Statement
The City of Guelph is committed to manage population growth as it continues to develop a strategy for ensuring adequate water supply. The goal is to develop a reliable and sustainable supply of water to meet the current and future needs of all residential, industrial, commercial, and institutional customers.
The existing water supply system generally meets the City's requirements, but is starting to experience difficulties in meeting peak demands. Dry summers, well interference, and water quality issues have reduced the capacity of the existing water supply system.
Recent analysis confirms that the existing water supply capacity will not meet future demands. It is, therefore, prudent to carry out a study to identify strategies to increase the capacity of the City’s existing water supply. The strategies must ensure that an adequate amount of water is provided in a safe and cost-effective manner while ensuring environmental sustainability is not compromised. The study will also focus on innovation and will also build upon current water conservation/efficiency measures.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
21
Phase 2: Alternative Solutions
Water Conservation/ Demand Management• The City has already developed and implemented a comprehensive water
conservation strategy that is regarded by many as a model.
• The City is committed to building on the success of the strategy.
• Continue to develop water conservation strategy such as encouraging the use of low flush toilets in existing and new developments, toilet replacement, leak detection, undertaking rehabilitation activities and accelerating the City’s unaccounted for water (UFW) program.
• Water use efficiency is effectively a source of water supply similar to a water supply from a municipal well.
• Develop Public Education Program to reinforce current and future strategies.
• Additional savings of 4 to 5 % may be expected from ongoing awareness programs.
• Reducing water use or reusing water (eg grey water used for golf course irrigation) can have the same effect as increasing water supply.
• Program success based on continuous monitoring as well as pricing mechanisms.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
22
Expand Existing Water Supply System
• Based on expanding/upgrading existing groundwater municipal water supply system and considering treatment of existing sources, innovative technologies, future requirements and current problems.
• To include: - Increase water takings from established sources
- Equip and operate inactive wells/provide treatment
- Optimize existing well capacities
- Possible Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)*
• Based on exploration for new groundwater sources within or outside of existing supply system.
• Develop additional groundwater supplies
Phase 2: Alternative Solutions cont’d
* ASR: Aquifer storage recovery (ASR) is a water management technology in which water is stored underground in a suitable aquifer through a well during times when the water is available, and recovered from the same well when needed. (AWWA 1996)
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
23
Phase 2: Alternative Solutions cont’d
Establish New Surface Water Supply – Local
• New Local Surface Water:
- Speed River, Eramosa River, Guelph Lake
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
24
Establish New Surface Water Supply - Regional
• New Other Surface Water Source
- Great Lake Pipelines (independent or in partnership with other municipalities)
Phase 2: Alternative Solutions cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
25
Limit Community Growth
• Reduce future water supply needs by limiting the extent, density, type and/or location of future residential, industrial, commercial and institutional growth in the City below levels identified in recent planning studies.
• Requires change to municipal planning documents.
Phase 2: Alternative Solutions cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
26
Do Nothing
• In which no improvements or changes would be undertaken to address present and long-term water supply requirements. This would have a significant impact on the growth potential for the City would be contrary to its Regional Official Plan and Growth Management Strategy.
• The “Do Nothing” alternative represents what would likely occur if none of the alternative solutions were implemented.
Phase 2: Alternative Solutions cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
27
Draft Evaluation Criteria for Consideration
Public Health & Safety: • Ability of Alternative to meet provincial water quality and
security requirements.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
28
Evaluation Criteria for Consideration cont’d
Natural Environmental: • Potential effects to the natural environment including
siting/routing considerations and/or constraints.
• Potential impacts to water resources e.g. fisheries, stream base flow, aquifers, groundwater.
• Potential impacts to natural heritage features, including provincially significant wetlands (PSWs), environmentally significant areas (ESAs), Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSIs), and sensitive species habitat (i.e. vulnerable/threatened/ endangered or locally/regionally rare).
• Environmental management planning considerations including mineral resources.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
29
Evaluation Criteria for Consideration cont’d
Social Cultural Considerations: • Land Use Impacts.
• Short-term construction related impacts including dust, traffic, access, and noise.
• Potential siting/routing considerations including cultural/ heritage (e.g. archaeological) and/or tourist recreational, as well as mineral resources.
• Potential impacts from operations including impacts to ground and surface water users.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
30
Economical/Financial Considerations: • Estimated capital costs.
• Estimated operations and maintenance costs including cost of water and source protection.
• Impacts to agricultural operations and other private land owners.
Evaluation Criteria for Consideration cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
31
Legal/Jurisdictional Considerations: • Location of facility relative to City boundaries (ie in or
outside) and associated jurisdictional issues (Consideration towards Political Boundaries).
• Land Requirements.
• Ability to address outside control (independence and reliability) of City with respect to participation in decision making, rate structures and risk related to location/position on proposed water supply scheme (e.g. end of pipe).
Evaluation Criteria for Consideration cont’d
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
32
Evaluation Criteria for Consideration cont’d
Technical Considerations: • Ability to implement alternative
• Ability to meet peak demands
• Maintaining operation during construction
• Minimizing disruptions/downtime
• Constructability
• Schedule and Timing
• Water Quality – Requirement for treatment
• Allowance for future treatment needs
• Expandability
• Ability to respond to change in regulatory treatment requirements/standards
• Ability of alternative to use existing infrastructure
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
33
Use of Descriptive Information and Qualitative Evaluation
A detailed assessment of each water supply alternative will be completed based on evaluation components and criteria.
Based on evaluations by consulting team with consideration of input received, short list alternatives will be ranked and carried forward for more detailed evaluation.
This may include a screening step that involves:
• primary criteria (e.g. inability to meet regulations, excessive costs, technical feasibility, unacceptable environmental or social disruption),
• secondary criteria (e.g. mitigable impacts such as construction truck traffic).
Suggested the evaluation not be based on a numerical ranking system.
To ensure statistical validity, such an approach would have to strictly adhere to statistical methods that are often difficult to apply.
Public Meeting
#1
March 8th, 2005
34
Propose a descriptive or qualitative evaluation that considers the suitability of alternative solutions/strategies based on significant advantages and disadvantages.
Comparisons and trade-offs will be made between alternatives and will form rationale for the identification of the preferred solution or water supply strategy.
Trade-offs will involve forfeiting an advantage or accepting a disadvantage to address a higher priority consideration.
Use of Descriptive Information and Qualitative Evaluation
Least preferred
Most preferred
• Prepare Master Plan Documentation
Notice of Project
Initiation
Notice of Project
Initiation
Notice of Completion
& PublicReview
Notice of Completion
& PublicReview
• Present:‐ Study
Background‐ Purpose
Statement‐ Identification of
Alternative Solutions/ Strategies
‐ Evaluation Criteria/ Methodology
‐ Next Steps• Input Required on: - All of the above
Council Approves
Master Plan
Public Meeting #1 March 8th, 2005
Ongoing Consultation as Required
eart
h tec
he
ng
ine
eri
ng
an
d t
ech
no
log
yfo
r th
e p
lan
et.
City of Guelph Water Supply Master Plan
Prepared by:Earth Tech Canada Inc.Corbloc Building, 2nd Floor80 King StreetSt. Catharines, OntarioL2R 7G1
EO 79765 2005
Initiate/ Complete Individual Projects
Initiate/ Complete Individual Projects
March 2005 Winter 20052004
Guelph Water Supply Master Plan Schedule
Notice of Public
Meeting #2
Notice of Public
Meeting #2
Public Meeting #2
• Present:‐Evaluation of Alternatives
‐Recommended Strategies
‐Project Descriptions
‐Project Timelines/ Triggers
‐Next Steps• Input Required on:
- Evaluation of Alternatives
‐Recommended Strategies
Notice of Public
Meeting #1
Notice of Public
Meeting #1
Fall
Next Steps
Comments received from review agencies* & the public are requested by March 22nd ,
2005. All comments received will be reviewed for consideration in the final report.
Comments received from review agencies* & the public are requested by March 22nd ,
2005. All comments received will be reviewed for consideration in the final report.
Review agencies* & the public will be notified of the Master Plan Study Report & will be provided with the opportunity to comment
during the Public Review Period
Review agencies* & the public will be notified of the Master Plan Study Report & will be provided with the opportunity to comment
during the Public Review Period
Upon completion of the public review period (30 day duration) the Master Plan Study
Report will be finalized
Upon completion of the public review period (30 day duration) the Master Plan Study
Report will be finalized
* Review agencies include Provincial Ministries (e.g. Environment, Natural Resources, Culture), Grand River Conservation Authority, local municipal departments & utilities (hydro, gas, Bell, etc.)
eart
h tec
hen
gin
eeri
ng
an
d t
ech
no
log
yfo
r th
e p
lan
et.
City of Guelph Water Supply Master Plan
Prepared By:Earth Tech Canada Inc101 Frederick Street, Suite 502, Kitchener, ON N2H 6R2
EO 79765 2005
Prepared For:City of Guelph59 Carden Street, Guelph, On N1H 3A1