City of South Daytona · WHEREAS, the City of South Daytona, Florida has the authority to amend its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS,

City of South Daytona Community Development Dept. Post Office Box 214960 • South Daytona, FL 32121 · 386/322-3020 • FAX 386/322-3029

To:

From:

Date:

Ref:

MEMORANDUM

Joseph W. Yarbrough, City Manager

John A. Dillard, P.E., Community Development Directov('1

March 3, 2009 ~ Adoption of Ordinance 08-26, Final Adoption Public Hearing; Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and Associated Comprehensive Plan Element Amendments

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1

This is the final adoption public hearing on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to adopt amendments to the Future Land Use, Capital Improvements, Intergovernmental Coordination, Conservation, Coastal Management, and Public Utilities Elements, and to adopt the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for compliance with Florida Statutes.

Background:

In 2005, the Florida Legislature made significant changes to Chapters 163 and 373, F.S. to strengthen the link between land use and water supply planning. These changes were included in Senate Bill 360 and Senate Bill 444. The legislative changes pursuant to Chapter 163.3177(6)(c) Florida Statutes encourage cooperation in the development of alternative water supplies and reemphasize the need for conservation and reuse.

Local governments are required to update their Comprehensive Plans to identify alternative and traditional water supply projects, conservation and reuse necessary to meet the water needs in their jurisdictions, and to include a Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for building public, private, and regional water supply facilities necessary to meet the water needs. The Water Supply Facilities Work Plan acts as a support document for the Comprehensive Plan amendments, identifying existing conditions, future needs, and plan implementation.

Continuing Com mitment to Excellence

This Comprehensive Plan Amendment is exempt from the twice-a-year limitation on plan amendment adoptions, pursuant to 163.3177, (6)(c) Florida Statutes.

At the November 19, 2008 Land Development Regulation Board's public hearing, the Board unanimously approved the proposed Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and associated proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and transmittal of the subject plan amendments to the City Council and Florida Department of Community Affairs.

On December 9, 2008, this Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and associated proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan was approved for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review. On February 20, 2009, the City received an Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report from the DCA. This ORC also stated the City had 60 days from receipt of this report to act on this Water Supply Facilities Work Plan by either choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the plan.

Recommendation:

Staff is requesting City Council's final approval and adoption to transmit said documents to the Florida Department of Community Mfairs and other reviewing agencies for compliance review.

This report qualifies as the lO-year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and includes the necessary amendments to the Goals, Objectives, and Policies and addresses concerns in the ORC which are highlighted in yellow and underlined in the report and attached documents, that must also be adopted by the City Council for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs at a public hearing.

2

ORDINANCE NO. 08·26

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA, VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCORPORATE THE CITY'S 10-YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES ELEMENT, AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the City of South Daytona, Florida desires to ensure that the City's Comprehensive Plan be amended to include a Water Supply Facilities Work Plan that is consistent with and reflects changes mandated by State law; and

WHEREAS, the City of South Daytona, Florida has the authority to amend its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and

WHEREAS, amendments relating to Water Supply Facilities planning are exempt from the limitation on frequency of comprehensive plan amendments in accordance with 163.3177(6)(c), Florida Statutes; and

WHEREAS, the Land Development Regulation Board acting as the designated Local Planning Agency, has reviewed the proposed Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and associated proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, held an advertised public hearing on November 19, 2008, providing for public participation in the process; and rendered its recommendation to the City Council of South Daytona; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SOUTH DAYTONA, VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA:

Section I. The City Council hereby authorizes transmittal of proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments relating to water supply facilities planning, including the City'S proposed lO-year Water Facilities Supply Work Plan, in accordance with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. The text of the proposed amendments is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein.

(

Section 2. The City Manager or his designee is hereby directed to immediately transmit the proposed amendments to the Department of Community Affairs and to provide a copy of the proposed amendments to the Regional Planning Council, the St. Johns Water Management District, the County of Volusia, the Florida Departments of State, Transportation, and Environmental Protection, and to any requesting agency, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163.3184(3)(a), Florida Statutes. The transmittal package to the Department of Community Affairs shall comply with Rule 9J-11.006(1), Florida Administrative Code.

Section 3. All ordinances made in conflict with the Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, or application hereof, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by an Court, such portion or application shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or application hereof.

Section 5. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs effective upon completion of the Intergovernmental approval process for Comprehensive Plan Amendments and the final order is issued by the Department of Community Mfairs.

PASSED at the first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South Daytona held in the City of South Daytona, Florida on the 9th day of

Ik.enber , 2008.

PASSED AND ADOPTED upon second and final reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of South Daytona held in the City of South Daytona, Florida on the ___ _ day of , 2009.

ATTEST:

JOSEPHW. YARBROUGH City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SCOTT E. SIMPSON City Attorney

SIGNED:

BLAINE O'NEAL, MAYOR

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT LARGE SCALE AMENDMENT TO

THE CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The City Council of the City of South Daytona proposes to adopt the following ordinance:

ORDINANCE NO. 08-26

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA, VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMPREHENSNE PLANNING; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN TO INCORPORATE THE CITY'S lO-YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK. PLAN; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES ELEMENT, AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

The public hearing on the second and final reading to adopt the proposed ordinance will be considered for approval and transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and other reviewing agencies by the South Daytona City Council on March 10, 2009 at 6:00 PM in the Council Room in City Hall located at 1672 S. Ridgewood Avenue, South Daytona, Florida. The proposed ordinance and documents may be inspected by the public at the Community Development Department or City Clerk's Office at City Hall, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM weekdays. Interested parties may appear at this public hearing and provide comments regarding the proposed ordinance. For additional information, contact the Community Development Department at (386) 322-3020.

The proposed ordinance will consider amending the City of South Daytona Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a 10-year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. Included are text amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Conservation Element, Coastal Element, Public Utilities Element, and Capital Improvements Element of the City of South Daytona Comprehensive Plan, in accordance with State law.

If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City of South Daytona City Council with respect to any matter considered at the above referenced public hearing, he/she will need a record of the proceedings. For such purposes, it may be necessary to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City Council assumes no responsibility for furnishing said record, however, the hearings will be audio recorded by the City Council for public use.

Note: Individuals covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in need of accommodations for the public meeting should contact the Office of the Deputy City Clerk at 1672 S. Ridgewood Avenue, South Daytona, FL 32119, telephone (386) 322-3011 at least five working days prior to the meeting.

CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA

WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

DCA NO. 09-RWSPl

RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DCA)

OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND COMMENT REPORT

March 10, 2009

The Department of Community Mfairs completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (DCA 09-RWSP1) and has supplied the City with three objections in their Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report (ORC). Staff has prepared responses to the objections and recommendations as stated below.

Objection #1: Alternative Water Supply (AWS), Conservation and Reuse Planning:

DCA Objection: The City has not proposed to adopt any policies regarding the Implementation of the City's A WS project (s) into the Comprehensive Plan or work plan. The City communicated to the Water Management District (WMD) that it selected single entity project 49, "South Daytona Reclaimed Water System Expansion, and the WMD found this project sufficient in July 2007. Additionally, the work plan does not describe any reuse, water conservation practices or nonpotable water supply projects.

[Section 163.3164(32), 163.3167(13), 163.3177(2), (6)(a), (c) and (d) Rule 9J-5.011(2)(b). F.AC.]

DCA Recommendation: The City should adopt policies regarding the implementation of the City's A WS project(s) into the work plan and the Comprehensive Plan. In the work plan, the City should describe the project(s) including how much water the project(s) will generate. If the project(s) are being implemented within the five year planning period, they must be included in the schedule of capital improvements in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and demonstrate financial feasibility pursuant to Section 163.3164(32), F.S. The City should describe all agreements related to the development of A WS, as well as the need to establish, maintain or revise the agreements.

Additionally, the City should describe any existing or proposed reuse or nonpotable water supply project that will be implemented in the planning period in the work plan. Reuse projects must be implemented through policies in the Comprehensive Plan, and be listed in the schedule of capital improvements and be financially feasible pursuant to Section 163.3164(32), F.S.

The City should also include adequate conservation practices in the work plan. The practices described in Conservation Element policies 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4 should be included in the work plan.

City Response to DCA Objection # 1:

The Work Plan has been revised to include the adjusted reclaimed water use for the phased system in the Ridgewood Avenue corridor. The projected time and funding for each phase of the Ridgewood Avenue Reclaimed water project has been clarified in both the work plan and the CIS. Practices described in Conservation Element policies 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4 have been included in the work plan.

2

Objection #2: Concurrency:

DCA Objection: The City's Capital Improvements Element Policy 3-2 states that public facilities must in place or under construction at the time a development order is issued, or in place at the time of project impact or construction will begin within one year of issuance of the development order. This is not consistent with Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., which states that adequate water supplies and facilities must be available no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or its functional equivalent. Additionally, the City does not have policies to ensure coordination with the City's water suppliers during the permit review process.

[Section 163.3167(13), Sections 163.3177(3)(a) and (6)(a), (c) and (h); 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.; Rule 9J-5.005(6), 9J-5.0055(1)(d) and (3)(a), 9J-5.016(3)(c) 5 and 6, F.A.C.]

DCA Recommendation: Revise Policy 3-2 of the CIE to state that the City shall not issue development orders to permits without first consulting with the City's water suppliers to determine whether adequate water supplies exist to serve the development, no later than the anticipated date of issuance of a certificate or occupancy, or its functional equivalent.

City Response to DCA Objection #2:

Policy 3-2(C)(4) of the CIE has been revised to state that the facility/service shall be available no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or its functional equivalent.

Objection #3: Coordination:

DCA Objection: The City has not proposed to amend the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) to ensure coordination with the WMD regarding water supply planning. Section 163.3177(6)(h)1, F.S. requires a local government's ICE to provide guidelines to be used to accomplish coordination with the applicable regional water supply plan. In addition, Section 163.3177(6), F.S. requires a local government to update their water supply plan every five years within 18 months after the water management district enacts an updated regional water suppl y plan.

[163.3177(4)(a), (6)(a), (c), (d) and (h), F.S.; Rule 9j-5.011(2)(b)2 and 4, Rule 9J-5.015(1) and (3)(c), F.A.C.]

DCA Recommendation: The City should revise the ICE of the Comprehensive Plan to state that the City will maintain a water supply plan that is coordinated with the WMD, and that the City shall update its water supply plan within 18 months of an update to the WMD's regional water supply plan.

3

City Response to DCA Objection #3:

Policy 2-9 has been added to the ICE and states that: The City will maintain a Water Supply Plan that is coordinated with the Water Management District and the City will update its Water Supply Plan every five years within 18-months after the Water Management District enacts an updated Regional Water Supply Plan.

DCA Comment #1: The work plan does not reference existing or proposed policies that provide for coordination with the City of Daytona Beach regarding the existing water supply agreement. Policies that enable coordination are required to ensure that the City has adequate water supply to accommodate its existing and projected population.

Additionally, the work plan does not reference proposed or existing policies enabling coordination with the East Volusia Regional Water Authority. The work plan should be revised to reference existing or proposed policies, specifically Policies 4-1 and 4-6 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and Policy 3-1 of the Public Utilities Element. Additionally, the work plan should describe the City's participation as a member of the East Vol usia Regional Water Authority and reference enabling language in the Comprehensive Plan.

City Response to Comment #1:

The work plan has been revised to reference existing policies, specifically Policies 4-1 and 4-6 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and Policy 3-1 of the Public Utilities Element.

DCA Comment #2: The City has not addressed all projects listed on the schedule of capital improvements in the work plan. The City should revise the work plan to describe all the water supply projects in the capital improvements schedule. The following projects were not included in the work plan, but are listed in the schedule: Palm Grove SewerIWater System, Chlorine Booster Station, and West Nova Road Water Main. Any other projects that will be implemented in the planning period (2025) to maintain level of service standards (LOSS) should also be described in the work plan, and be included in the schedule of capital improvements if occurring in the first five years.

City Response to Comment #2:

All of the water facilities projects as shown on the City'S Capital Improvements Schedule (CIS) have been further described in the water plan. The Palm Grove Water & Sewer project currently shown on the CIS is only the stormwater phase of a water and sewer project completed back in 2005. No other projects are currently proposed to maintain level of service standards within the City in the planning period (2025).

4

In addition to the above revisions and as recommendations made by the St. Johns River Water Management District, the following have been added to the Water Supply Facilities Plan:

1. Map (Figure 4.3) has been added to show the non-potable water service area in the City.

2. The Water Supply Facilities Plan now references Intergovernmental Coordination Element policy 4-6.

3. The projected reclaimed water use for project 49 has been adjusted and is now consistent with DWSP 200S that states the project will generate 0.14 million gallons per day (first phase).

4. All potable water projects in the CIS are now described in the Water Supply Plan, S. The Water Supply Plan now includes the practices based on the Comprehensive

Plan Policies, specifically Conservation Element Policy 3-2, 3-3 and 3-4.

S


WATER SUPPLY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

AND WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLANS

City of South Daytona, Florida Community Development

November 2008

Revised March 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contents

I. Introduction

II. Statutory Requirements

III. Water Supply Planning Requirements

IV. Water Supply Work Plan

Service Area Area Description Area Land Use Service Area Boundaries

Existing and Alternative Water Sources Historical and Projected Use Potable Water Supply Quality Regional Water Supply Planning Coordination with Water Suppliers Alternative Water Supply

Potable and Reclaimed Water Systems Existing Potable Water System Proposed Water Facilities Capital Improvements Potable Water Local Interconnections Coordination with Potable Water Suppliers Water Supply Conservation Practices Approach to the Use of Reclaimed Water Reclaimed Water Availability Proposed Capital Improvements Reclaimed Water Distribution System

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A: 5-year Capital Improvements Plan

Page

2

2

4

6

6 7 9

11 15 20 21 22

23 24 25 25 25 26 28 28 29

Attachment B: S1. Johns River District Water Supply Plan - Second Addendum

10f29

I. INTRODUCTION

Four of Florida's five Water Management Districts have determined that traditional

water supply sources currently used in their districts will not be sufficient to meet the

demands of the growing population and the needs of the environment, agriculture and

industry over the next twenty years. Only the Suwannee River Water Management District

has concluded that its traditional water supplies will be sufficient to serve the district's needs

over the next twenty years. As potential limitations on the continued use of traditional water

supplies became increasingly apparent in recent years, the Florida Legislature enacted bills

in 2002, 2004 and 2005 to more effectively address the state's water supply needs by

improving the coordination between local land use planning and water supply planning. The

focus of the 2002 legislation was to add requirements to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes

(F.S.), for local governments to prepare 10-year water supply facilities work plans and to

incorporate the work plans into their comprehensive plans. This legislative change

emphasized the need for local comprehensive plans to consider the applicable regional

water supply plans prepared by the water management districts. In 2004, the Legislature

further amended Chapter 163 to give local governments until December 1, 2006, to prepare

the 10-year water supply facilities work plans.

In 2005, the Florida Legislature Significantly changed Chapters 163 and 373, F.S., to

improve the coordination of water supply and land use planning. Senate Bills 360 and 444

strengthened the statutory linkage between the regional water supply plans prepared by the

water management districts and comprehensive plans prepared by the local governments.

Implementation of the new water supply planning requirements will ensure that adequate

water supplies and public facilities are available to serve the water supply demands of

Florida's growing population.

II. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

With regard to water supply, current statutory provisions direct the City of South

Daytona to:

1. Coordinate appropriate aspects of its comprehensive plan with the St.

Johns River Water Management District's regional water supply plan.

2. Ensure that the City of South Daytona's future land use plan is based upon

the availability of adequate water supplies and public facilities and services. With

appropriate data and analysis, demonstrate that adequate water supplies and

associated public facilities will be available to meet the projected growth demands

20f29

and this information must accompany all proposed Future Land Use Map

amendments submitted to the Department for review. The submitted package must

also include an amendment to the Capital Improvements Element, if necessary, to

demonstrate that adequate public facilities will be available to serve the proposed

Future Land Use Map modification.

3. Ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities are available to serve

new development no later than the date on which the local government anticipates

issuing a certificate of occupancy and consult with the City of Daytona Beach as the

water supplier, prior to approving a building permit, to determine whether adequate

water supplies will be available to serve the development by the anticipated issuance

date of the certificate of occupancy.

4. The City of South Daytona shall revise the General Sanitary Sewer, Solid

Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge

Element (the "Infrastructure Element"), within 18 months after the Water

Management District approves an updated regional water supply plan, to:

a. Identify and incorporate the alternative water supply

project(s) selected by the local government from projects identified in

the updated regional water supply plan, or the alternative project

proposed by the local government;

b. Identify the traditional and alternative water supply projects,

bulk sales agreements, and the conservation and reclaimed water

programs necessary to meet current and future water use demands

within the local government's jurisdiction; and

c. Include a water supply facilities work plan for at least a 10-

year planning period for constructing the public, private, and regional

water supply facilities identified in the element as necessary to serve

existing and new development. Amendments to incorporate the water

supply facilities work plan into the comprehensive plan are exempt

from the twice-a-year amendment limitation.

5. Revise the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to include any

water supply, reclaimed water, and conservation projects and programs to be

implemented during the five-year period.

30f29

6. To the extent necessary to maintain internal consistency after making

changes described in Paragraphs 1 through 5 above, revise the Conservation

Element to assess projected water needs and sources for at least a 10-year planning

period, considering the appropriate regional water supply plan(s) or, in the absence

of an approved regional water supply plan, the applicable District Water

Management Plan, as well as applicable consumptive use permit. If the established

planning period of a comprehensive plan is greater than ten years, the plan must

address the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and

projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the

appropriate regional water supply plan.

7. To the extent necessary to maintain internal consistency after making

changes described in Paragraphs 1 through 5 above, revise the Intergovernmental

Coordination Element to ensure coordination of the comprehensive plan with

applicable regional water supply plans and regional water supply authorities' plans.

8. Address in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), the extent to which

the local government has implemented the 10-year water supply facilities work plan,

including the development of alternative water supplies, and determine whether the

identified alternative water supply projects, traditional water supply projects, bulk

sales agreements, and conservation and reclaimed water programs are meeting

local water use demands.

III. WATER SUPPLY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS

Effective July 1, 2005, all local governments must meet water supply concurrency

requirements and ensure that their future land use plans (the Future Land Use Element and

Future Land Use Map) are based upon the availability of adequate water supplies and

associated public facilities. All local governments are advised to update their

comprehensive plans and land development regulations as soon as possible to address the

water supply concurrency requirement. Data and analysis to demonstrate that adequate

water supplies and associated public facilities are, or will be available to meet projected

growth demands must accompany all proposed Future Land Use Map amendments

submitted to the Department for review.

Local governments subject to a regional water supply plan must revise their

comprehensive plans within 18 months after the water management district approves a

regional water supply plan or its update, to ensure that:

40f29

The Infrastructure Element identifies altemative and traditional water supply

projects, and conservation and reclaimed water programs necessary to meet the

projected water demands identified within the local government's jurisdiction;

incorporates the altemative water supply project(s) the local government has

selected from the regional water supply plan or proposed as an alternative under s.

373.0361 (7)(b), F.S.; and includes a minimum 10-year work plan for building public,

private, and regional water supply facilities necessary to serve existing and new

development.

The Capital Improvements Element addresses the need for and location of

public facilities, including those identified in the 10-year water facilities work plan.

The financially feasible Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements must describe

projects listed in the 10-year work plan that are to be implemented in the first five

years of the plan, including both publicly and privately funded water supply projects

that are necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are achieved

and maintained.

The Conservation Element includes an assessment of current and projected

water needs and sources for a minimum 10-year period, considering the appropriate

regional water supply plan and consumptive use permit. If the established planning

period of the comprehensive plan is greater than ten years, the assessment must

address the water supply needs and sources for the longer planning period.

The Intergovernmental Coordination Element addresses coordination of the

comprehensive plan with the applicable regional water supply plan(s) and regional

water supply authorities' plans. For local govemments that lie within more than

one water management district, the due date for adopting the amendments is 18

months from the approval date of the last regional water supply plan (or update)

applicable to the local government. See Attachment A for a map depicting areas

that are subject to regional water supply plans. Attachment B identifies the dates by

which amendments to local comprehensive plans must be adopted to incorporate

the 10-year water supply facilities work plans. See Attachment C for an overview of

regional water supply plans.

Local governments that are not subject to a regional water supply plan must address the

following in their next Evaluation and Appraisal Reports (EARs) and adopt the necessary

EAR-based amendments to ensure that:

50f29

The Conservation Element identifies the current and projected water needs

and sources for a minimum 10-year period, considering the appropriate district water

management plan, consumptive use permit and associated water supply

assessment reports. If the established planning period of a comprehensive plan is

greater than ten years, the assessment must address the water supply needs and

sources for the longer planning period.

The Intergovernmental Coordination Element addresses coordination with

regional water supply authorities, where the local government is served by a regional

water supply authority. See Section F for additional information about addressing

water supply issues in Evaluation and Appraisal Reports.

IV. WATER SUPPLY WORK PLAN

Service Area:

Area Description:

South Daytona is a small Halifax River City (13,547 residents) located between the

much larger cities of Daytona Beach and Port Orange. It once was mainly an agricultural

community engaged in orange growing and vegetable gardening because the land was

particularly suited for those types of agriculture. The City of Daytona Beach annexed the

community around 1926. However, the local residents became upset about the new taxes

and other levies and obtained legal assistance to "undo" the annexation. In 1938 they

succeeded in getting the annexation rescinded and formally established the Town of South

Daytona.

After the end of World War II, the Town established a building department, and soon

after, a Planning and Zoning Board. During this time, the town was able to obtain federal

assistance for the expansion of utility infrastructure. South Daytona was the first community

in the Halifax area, after Daytona Beach, to begin installing a sanitary sewer collection

system.

In 1951 the Town incorporated as the City of South Daytona. Since 1980, the City

has operated under a Council/Manager form of government. Starting in 1990 the Mayor and

four Council members, all elected at-large, had their staggered terms of office increased

from two years to four years.

The City has expanded its land area through annexation---there was one major

annexation in the 1970's and another one in 2002. However, since the City is virtually

60f29

"boxed-in" the only remaining annexation opportunities would be through voluntary

annexation of a few acres on the west side of Nova Rd.

The City has grown from a population of approximately 2,000 residents in 1960 to a

year 2007 estimate of 13,547---however, the potential for future geographic and population

growth is severely limited. Most of the available residential land already has housing, with

the main exception of approximately 50 acres in the US1 Redevelopment District which are

zoned for high-density condominium projects (though it is questionable whether most of

them will ever be constructed with the large number of units proposed). Therefore, the

maximum future population within the City limits probably will never increase to much over

16,000 persons, ifthat.

The existing water service area encompasses the entire incorporated limits of the

City of South Daytona. When the City began developing the utilities infrastructure, a

wholesale supply agreement was reached with Daytona Beach for South Daytona's potable

water and wastewater treatment needs. This agreement has been modified over the years,

but Daytona Beach still remains South Daytona's primary source for its water and

wastewater needs. A location map depicting the City of South Daytona in relation to the

adjacent cities in the greater Halifax area is shown in Figure 1-1.

Area Land Use:

The City of South Daytona covers a land area of approximately 3.75 square miles,

with a year -2000 Census population of 13,177 and an estimated population on April 1, 2007

of 13,547 (BEBR estimate). The City contains approximately 6,570 dwelling units, including

about 943 mobile homes.

South Daytona was incorporated in 1951, but most of its growth has occurred since

1970, when the population was only about 5,000 persons. Despite spurts of growth during

the 70's, 80's, and early 90's, during the past decade it has been one of the slowest growing

cities in Volusia County due to its small size and largely built-out character. Unless the City

gains significant population as a result of high-density condo construction along the river

and mixed-use redevelopment in the Sunshine Park Mall area or elsewhere in the

Redevelopment District, this slow growth is likely to become a longer-term trend given that

the City has very little vacant land left for development, along with the fact that very little

residential land adjacent to the City limits is available for annexation.

Because the City's land area is over 90% developed, the major opportunity for

growth is now redevelopment of older properties, especially within the Ridgewood Corridor

70f29

t N HOLLY

HILL

ORMOND BEACH

DAYTONA BEACH

VOLUSIA COUNTY I"

CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA LOCATION MAP

Halifax River

Atlantic Ocean

DAYTONA BEACH SHORES

PORT ORANGE

FIGURE 1-1

(U.S.-1) Community Redevelopment Area (CRA), which was created in 1987 and covers

about 25% of the land area of the City. A few years ago, Halifax River shoreline properties

in the CRA attracted developers proposing to construct high-density, high-rise condominium

projects, which could ultimately increase the City's population by several thousand

inhabitants, However, even though the City has entered into development agreements for

six such projects, only one (Halifax Landing with 186 dwelling units) is now constructed.

The other projects are currently problematic due to a market characterized by weak demand

for an over-supply of condominium units.

Table 4-'1 below provides a breakdown of current city-wide land uses.

LAND USE

Residential

Density Range 1

Density Range 2

Density Range 3

Density Range 4

Mobile Homes

Commercial

Industrial

Parkland

I * Public

** Other

Total

TABLE 4-1

EXISTING GROSS ACREAGE BY LAND USE

MAY, 2007


ACRES PERCENT

1378 57.00% (excludes streets)

520 21.40% (single-family)

516 21.30% (single-family)

132 5.40% (Iow-density multi-family)

40 1.60% (high-density multi-family)

170 7.00%

292 12.02%

168 6.94%

10 24.20%

289 11.90%

196 7.94%

2,425 100.00%

Note: * "Public" includes street rights-of-way, except arterial roadways ..

** "Other" includes churches, private schools, railroad r/w, arterials, etc.

Source: City Community Development Dept.

Service Area Boundaries:

The service area boundaries for the City of South Daytona's potable water

di~tribution system are consistent with and bounded by the City Limits. The City is

comprised of 5.19 square miles and the potable water system covers the entire service

area. See Figure 4-1.

90f29

Halifax River

GIW'IIIC SC.wl

"kaMa""- T T

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION CORPORATE LIMITS OF SOUTH DAYTONA, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 30, 2008

FIGURE 4-1

Existing and Alternative Water Source:

Historical and Projected Use:

As mentioned earlier in the report, the population of the City of South Daytona was

approximately 2000 persons in 1960. The City of South Daytona has always purchased

wholesale potable water from Daytona Beach and in 1960 the estimated annual average

daily flow was approximately 254,000 gallons per day or about 93 gallons per day per

capita. As population increased so did the City's demand for potable water. The following

chart shows the annual average daily flow per equivalent residential connection (ERC) for

potable water purchased from the City of Daytona Beach. As you can see, the annual

average daily flow reached a peak of 231.0 gallons per service per day in 1999/2000 fiscal

year and was the lowest in the fiscal year 2006/2007 with 187.0 gallons per day per ERC.

With conservation methods and improved fixture units, the ERC usage has had a downward

trend over the past 10 years decreased to 208.0 gallons per service per day in 2007/2008.

City of SOUTH DAYTONA Daily Use per Equivalent Residential Connection

250 >-m 200 Q ... Q) 150 Q.

l:""!::FIOW! In 100 c

0

m 50 0

0

Figure 4·2

As shown in figure 4-2, between fiscal years 1999/2000 and 2001/2002, South

Daytona recorded a reduction in water usage of approximately 12%. This reduction was

based on the City of Daytona Beach reading the three wholesale meters at South Daytona's

City limits. At the time neither South Daytona nor Daytona Beach could explain this drop in

water usage nor this initiated several investigations by South Daytona to determine the

11 of29

cause of this reduction. According to Daytona Beach, the billing for wastewater treatment

during this period of time to South Daytona also dropped by approximately the same rate.

In talks with Daytona Beach, it was clear that there was no reasonable explanation for this

reduction. The three wholesale potable water meters were recalibrated; wastewater flows

were recorded by City staff as a correlation to water usage and canvassing local contractors

to determine if major repairs were made within the Daytona Beach water and sewer

systems that would explain this reduction in water usage.

III c 0

m (!) c :c 0

"-

1,200,000 1,150,000 1,100,000 1,050,000 1,000,000

950,000 900,000

CITY of SOUTH DAYTONA Average Annual Daily Water Usage

Figure 4·3

I-+-Flowl

As shown in this data, the usage per service connection has declined over the past

eleven years and also has the overall annual average daily usage. With a prOjected

population in 2025 for the City of South Daytona at 16,146 persons as shown in the 2008

Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), the projected average annual daily water

usage for the year 2025 using 2.6 persons per ERC, the average equates to 6,210 service

connections with an average daily use of 214 gallons per service per day, would be

1,328,940 gallons per day. Using a peak factor of 120%, the maximum daily usage could

reach about 1,600,000 gallons per day. The City of Daytona Beach has more than

accounted for this usage with their projected growth for South Daytona well in excess of

23,000 persons in 2025 with a daily annual average of 2,300,000 gallons per day and a

peak daily average of 2,875,000 gallons per day.

120f29

Table 4-2 below provides a Past and Projected Potable Water Usage.

TABLE 4-2


EXISTING AND PROJECTED POPULATIONS

WITH RECORDED AND PROJECTED POTABLE WATER USAGE

YEAR POPULATION PROJE~TED POPULATION WATER USAGE PROJECTED USAGE**

1980 11,252

1990 12,488

2000 13,177

2005 13,955

2008 13,148

2010 14,502

2015 15,050

2020 15,597

2025 16,146

•• Based on 2.6 persons per ERC and 214 gpd/ERC

1,001,428 gal.

1,089,163 gal.

1,149,255 gal.

1,059,189 gal.

1,051,856 gal.

1,193,626 gal.

1,238,731 gal.

1,283,753 gal.

1,328,940 gal.

The City of Daytona Beach water service area population was 80,628 (BEBR) in 2005,

including the City of South Daytona and a portion of Daytona Beach Shores. The City of

Daytona Beach has maintained a steady growth rate since the automobile races began in

1902. The historical populations are listed in Table 1-2. It should be noted that several

different sources for population figures were used during this time period and this is

responsible for the appearance of the erratic annual figures.

Population projections for Daytona Beach and South Daytona:

Population projections for Daytona Beach:

2000(census) 2005(BEBR) 2010 64,112 65,119 69,432 Source - U.S. Census, BEBR, TMH Consulting

1995 2015 2020 2025 63,258 67,620 68,730 69,681 Source - Affordable Housing Needs Assessment(AHNA)

13 of29

2015 75,736

2020 78,040

2025 82,344

Population projections for South Daytona:


2015 15,050

1995 2015 2020 2025 12,889 13,900 14,154 14,375 Source - Affordable Housing Needs Assessment(AHNA)

2020 15,597

2025 16,146

Population projections for portions of Daytona Beach Shores served by Daytona Beach (approx. 1/3 served water by Daytona Beach, 2/3 by Port Orange):


2015 1,659

1995 2015 2020 2025 893 1,376 1,499 1,617 Source - Affordable Housing Needs Assessment(AHNA)

2020 1,711

2025 1,764

The well field firm capacity for the City of Daytona Beach is 28.2 MGD, the water treatment

plant capacity is 24 MGD and the current CUP allocation is 16.16 MGD. Using the water

treatment plant capacity of 24 MGD, the following water capacity is still available.

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 MGD Total 24 24 24 24 24 24

MGD Used 11.80 12.09 12.84 13.86 14.39 15.03

MGD Available 12.20 11.91 11.16 10.14 9.61 8.97

Based on the above analysis, adequate potable water supply will be available to meet future

population growth within the City of Daytona Beach service area. It should be noted that

these projections of available water capacity do not reflect reductions in water needs that

can be expected from conservation efforts and continued and increased utilization of

reclaimed water. As water conservation and water reclaimed water programs are further

strengthened and implemented, adequacy of the water supply available will extend well

beyond this planning horizon.

14 of29

Potable Water Supply Quality:

The potable water supply for South Daytona is supplied by the City of Daytona

Beach. Daytona Beach currently has one water treatment facility; the Ralph Brennan WTP

and this facility is located off of LPGA Boulevard. This water treatment facility is a lime

softening plant that was initially constructed in 1975 with later retrofits in 1986 and has a

current permitted average daily capacity of 24.0 million gallons per day. The lime softening

treatment consists of: coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation. Calcium carbonate is

produced as a waste product at a rate of two parts of sludge for every one part of lime

added. Sodium Fluosilicate is added to the water to increase fluoride levels and liquid

phosphate is added to reduce the corrosive tendency of the softened water in the

distribution system.

The raw water for this treatment system is currently withdrawn from the upper

Floridan Aquifer by means of 26 supply wells with an average depth of 250 feet. The

following test results reflect the latest full analysis for the potable supply.

City of Daytona Beach Water Test Results Performed in 2007

Analysis Report by Southern Analytical Laboratories, Inc. August 21, 2007

Inorganic Contaminants 62-550.310(1)

Contaminant Contaminant Analysis 10 Name MCl Units Result Qualifier*

1040 Nitrate (as N) 10 mg/L 0.002 U 1041 Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.005 U 1005 Arsenic 0.01 mg/L 0.001 U 1010 Barium 2 mg/L 0.023 I 1015 Cadmium 0.005 mg/L 0.001 U 1020 Chromium 0.1 mg/L 0.01 U 1024 Cyanide 0.2 mg/L 0.005 U 1025 Fluoride 4 mg/L 0.20 1030 Lead 0.015 mg/L 0.001 U 1035 Mercury 0.002 mg/L 0.0001 U 1036 Nickel 0.1 mg/L 0.02 U 1045 Selenium 0.05 mg/L 0.001 U 1052 Sodium 160 mg/L 35 1074 Antimony 0.006 mg/L 0.001 U 1075 Beryllium 0.004 mg/L 0.002 U 1085 Thallium 0.002 mg/L 0.001 U

*Qualifiers: U Analyte was undetected. Indicated concentration is method detection limit.

150f29

Secondary Contaminants 62-550.320 Contaminant Contaminant Analysis

10 Name MCl Units Result 1002 Aluminum 0.2 mg/L 0.1 1017 Chloride 250 mg/L 34 1022 Copper 1 mg/L 0.005 1025 Fluoride 2 mg/L 0.20 1028 Iron 0.3 mg/L 0.12 1032 Manganese 0.05 mg/L 0.010 1050 Silver 0.1 mg/L 0.01 1055 Sulfate 250 mg/L 1.5 1095 Zinc 5 mg/L 0.012 1905 Color 15 CU 20 1920 Odor 3 TON 1 1925 pH 8.5 7.2 1930 Total Dissolved Solids 500 mg/L 300 2905 Foaming Agents 0.5 mg/L 0.06

"Qualifiers: I The reported value is between the laboratory method

detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit U Analyte was undetected. Indicated concentration is method

detection limit.

Disinfection Byproducts 62-550.310(3) Contaminant

10

2941 2942 2943 2944 2950

"Qualifier: U

Contaminant Analysis Name MCl Units Result

Chloroform N/A pg/L 0.2 Bromoform N/A pg/L 0.5 Bromodich loromethane N/A pg/L 0.3 Dibromochloromethane N/A pg/L 0.50 Total Trihalomethanes 80 pg/L 0.2

Analyte was undetected. Indicated concentration is method detection limit.

160f29

Qualifier*" U

U

I U

U

Qualifier*"

U U U U U

Radionuclides 62-550.310(6)

Analysis Contaminant 10

Contaminant Name MCl Units Result Qualifier*

4002 Gross Alpha (Incl. Uranium) ...... pCilL 2.5 4006 Combined Uranium 20 pCi/L 0.6 4020 Radium-226 5" pC ilL 0.9 4030 Radium-228 5" pCi/L 0.7

"Combined Limit mlf the results exceed 5 pCi/L, a measurement for radium-226 is required.

U1 U1

If the results exceed 15 pCi/L, measurements for radium-226 and uranium are required.

"Qualifier: U1 Analyte was not detected, indicated concentration is method detection

limit. Radiochemistry MDL is sample specific and matrix dependent.

Volatile Organics 62-550.310(4)(a) Contaminant Contaminant Analysis

10 Name MCl Units Result Qualifier*

2378 1.2,4 Trichlorobenzene 70 pg/L 0.5 U 2380 cis-1, 2-Dichloroethylene 70 pg/L 0.2 U 2955 Xylenes (total) 10,000 pg/L 0.5 U 2964 Dich loromethane 5 pg/L 0.5 U 2968 o-Dichlorobenzene 600 pg/L 0.5 U 2969 para-Dichlorobenzene 75 pg/L 0.5 U 2976 Vinyl Chloride 1 pg/L 0.5 U 2977 1 ,1-Dichloroethylene 7 pg/L 0.5 U 2979 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 100 pg/L 0.5 U 2980 1,2-Dichloroethane 3 pg/L 0.2 U 2981 1,1.1-Trichloroethane 200 pg/L 0.3 U 2982 Carbon tetrachloride 3 pg/L 0.3 U 2983 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 pg/L 0.3 U 2984 Trichloroethylene 3 pg/L 0.2 U 2985 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 pg/L 0.3 U 2987 T etrach loroethylene 3 pg/L 0.2 U 2989 Monochlorobenzene 100 pg/L 0.5 U 2990 Benzene 1 pg/L 0.5 U 2991 Toluene 1,000 pg/L 0.5 U 2992 Ethylbenzene 700 pg/L 0.5 U 2996 Styrene 100 pg/L 0.5 U

"Qualifier:

U Analyte was undetected. Indicated concentration is method detection limit.

170f29

Other Contaminants

Contaminant 10

*Qualifier:

Contaminant Name

Enterococcit100 ml Calcium Magnesium Potassium Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaC03 Fecal Coliform Total Coliform Corrosivity @ 20C Corrosivity@ 57.2C Total Alkalinity as CaC03 Calcium Hardness as CaC03 Corrosivity @ 32.2C

Analysis MCl Units Result

mgtl mgll mgll

mgll

mg/l mgll

1 100 8.5 1.0

280 Absent Absent

0.1 0.64 280 250

0.25

Qualifier*

U.S23

U

U.S23 Analyte was undetected. Indicated concentration is method detection limit. Analysis subcontracted to Volusia County Environmental Health Lab Analysis, FLOOH Cert. No. E23111.

U Analyte was undetected. Indicated concentration is method detection limit.

Inorganic Contaminants Contaminant .1)_0' !,.e!. ...... Level Range ."CI..". MCl pkely $o.,rce of an<tUnitCif $~p'it1g \(i,'~n .. QeteCted···· of Contamioation """urtrtl.m . ·..(bto.l~r.l .YLH·· I > .• iteaitit$ Fluoride (ppm) 07111/07 N 0.63 N/A 4 4 Erosion of natural

deposits; water additive which promotes strong teeth

Sodium (ppm) 07111/07 N 31 N/A N/A 160 Salt water intrusion leaching from soil

Nitrate (ppm) 07111/07 N 0.02 N/A 10 10 Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural depoSits

18of29

q~mjrnmtand Dates of Mel· ... .Lever Range MClG MCLor Likely Source of Unit of

Sampling ViOlation ...

Oetected of or MROl Contamination MRDlG . ' M_utament

(mo.lyr.) YIN .... ResUlts ' .'

., ...•.. . . .. . Bromate (ppb) 1/07 - N 0.05 ND-5.0 N/A Mel= By-product of

12/07 10 drinking water disinfection

Chloramines and 1/07 - N 3.4 0.0-5.0 N/A MRDl Water additive Chlorine (ppm)

12/07 =4 used to control

microbes

I **Haloacetic Acids 1/1107, N 38.4 24.3- N/A Mel= By-product of • (five) (HAA5) (ppb)

12/31/07 52.5 60 drinking water

disinfection

*TTHM {Total 111107, N 35 32.0- N/A Mel= By-product of trihalomethanes}

12131/07 38.0 80 drinking water

(ppb) disinfection

*Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Some people who drink water containing trihalomethanes in excess of the MCl over many years may experience problems with their liver, kidneys, or central nervous system, and may have an increased risk of getting cancer.

**Haloacetlc Acids (HAAS) Some people who drink water containing haloacetic acids in excess of the MCl over many years may have an increased risk of getting cancer.

CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA WATER TEST RESULTS 2007

. ..

i

I

Lik&lySoure& Of Contamination

01107-12107 For systems that Naturally present in collect <40 the environment samples per month: 1 positive monthl sam Ie

Important Information: The one positive sample occurred during the month of June. The Total Coliform Rule requires water systems to meet a strict limit for coliform bacteria. Coliform bacteria are usually harmless, but their presence in water can be an indication of disease.causing bacteria. When coliform bacteria are found, special followup tests are done to determine if harmful bacteria are present in the water supply. If this limit is exceeded, the water

! su lier must notif the ublic via news a er, teleVision, andlor radio.

Inorganic. Pat~9f) •. AL· •.••. .9Ottl #otsite& Mq.G Action Likely SOurce of Contaminants sampling. violation f'~ntile abOVeAL. level Contamination (Tapsatnples) I YiN Re$lJlts .

, ... . ... .... ..

Lead (ppb) 06/05- N 3 1 above AL 0 15 Corrosion of 07/05 out of 60 site household

samples plumbing system Copper (ppm) 06/05- N 0.08 o above AL 1.3 1.3 Corrosion of

07105 out of 60 site household samples plumbing system

190f29

I

Regional Water Supply Planning:

The 2005 Water Supply Plan as developed by the St. Johns River Water

Management District has projected that some locations within the District will likely approach

or even reach, sustainable limits within the 20-year planning horizon. Therefore, the District

has identified water supply development project options and water resource development

projects that will meet future water supply needs. Water supply projects for the City of

Daytona Beach identified in the 2005 water supply plan, which supplies South Daytona's

potable water, included the Daytona Beach reclaimed water reservoir, Daytona Beach

reclaimed water pipeline, and Daytona Beach reclaimed water system. Additionally,

Daytona Beach has begun an investigation into an aquifer storage and recovery facility as a

possible alternate water source. Primary discussions have taken place with both the District

and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) staff. The construction

permit has been issued by FDEP for this project.

The City was a member of the 14 member planning agency known as the Water

Authority of Volusia (WAV), as well as the East Volusia Regional Water Authority, both the

City of South Daytona and it's potable water supplier, the City of Daytona Beach, have been

long term members and supporters of the regional planning organizations. The City's

commitment to this coordination is stated in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element

Policy 4-6. In the capacity as a member of WAV, the City had actively participated in

developing alternative water supply options through facilities planning by the City of Daytona

Beach for WAV. One important element of the water supply planning identified by WAV,

was the promotion of water conservation. The City worked closely with the conservation

coordinator of W AV and identified and implemented conservation projects for the Daytona

Beach/South Daytona area. Examples of these projects included xeriscape landscaping,

low flow toilet rebates, low flow showerhead replacements, educational programs and rain

sensors for irrigation systems.

In 2007, the City of South Daytona, along with Daytona Beach discontinued its

association with WAV and concentrated exclusively with the East Vol usia Regional Water

Authority. The City of South Daytona is a full member of the East Vol usia Regional Water

authority and partiCipates with all of its functions.

Through the St. Johns River Water Management District planning, South Daytona is

identified in the plan as having project DWSP 49, which is a reclaimed water system

expansion to 0.14 million gallons per day reclaimed water distribution. Potable water

distribution system inter-connects have also been earmarked .

200f29

Coordination with Surrounding Area Water Suppliers:

In addition to coordinating with the St. Johns River Water Management District, the

local governments are encouraged to work closely with local water utilities that supply water

to the community. As stated earlier, the City of South Daytona is bordered by Daytona

Beach to the north and Port Orange to the south and in some areas, the City abuts property

under County jurisdiction.

The City of Port Orange's potable water supply system to the south of the City of

South Daytona consists of one (1) water treatment plant with 34 wells. Their water

treatment plant is permitted for capacity of 15.0 million gallons per day which is sufficient to

supply City of Port Orange service area including the incorporated City Limits of Ponce Inlet,

Wilbur by the Sea, a portion of Daytona Beach Shores, Harbor Oaks, Allendale and several

mobile home parks in the unincorporated areas of Volusia County. Due to these facilities;

the City of Port Orange appears to be self-sufficient in water supply. In past years, the City

of South Daytona has approached Port Orange as a supply source for wholesale water to

the City. The physical connection to the Port Orange water distribution system would be a

fairly easy process. However, at this time Daytona Beach is a more economically feasible

source of potable water for the City of South Daytona and over the years the two Cities have

developed a good working relationship.

The City of Daytona Beach's potable water system lies to the North of South

Daytona. The City of South Daytona has historically purchased its potable water under a

wholesale contract with Daytona Beach since before the 1960's. Daytona Beach's existing

potable water supply, treatment and distribution system consists of raw water supply wells,

a single water treatment plant along with associated high service pumping facilities and

ground storage. Daytona Beach's existing Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) authorizes the

average daily withdrawal of 16.16 million gallons per day (MGD) from the Floridan aquifer to

serve the projected demand of year 2011 with a maximum day withdrawal not to exceed

24.0 MGD. This amount is equivalent to the full hydraulic capacity of the existing water

treatment plant.

Daytona Beach's Ralph Brennan Water Treatment Plant water treatment facility is

currently permitted for an average daily capacity of 24.0 MGD. The system currently

withdraws its groundwater supply from the upper Floridan aquifer by the means of 26 supply

wells averaging 293 feet in depth. The total well capacity actually exceeds the treatment

capacity and is currently set at 28.2 million gallons per day.

21 of29

The City of South Daytona's potable water distribution system currently consists of

approximately 40 miles above water mains ranging from 4 to 14-inch in diameter. At one

time the City had an elevated storage tank located in the southeastern portion of town.

However, due to consistently high pressure within the distribution system, the water within

the storage tank rarely cycled and maintaining unacceptable disinfection level was

practically impossible. This elevated storage tank was eventually removed and

improvements to the distribution system were made to ensure a safe and adequate water

supply for both potable use and fire protection.

A part of the local coordination between adjacent cities is the local interconnections

between potable supply systems. These local interconnects provide redundancy as

required by the Florida Department of Environment Protection (FDEP) and Volusia County

Health Department regulations. These interconnects can provide adequate fire flow for

emergency conditions, and provide capacity in facilities when necessary, to ensure the

proper potable supply until the next incremental increase in capacity or facilities can be

constructed.

The City of Daytona Beach, which supplies South Daytona with potable water

currently, has emergency interconnect agreements with several local municipalities. The

City of Daytona Beach has three existing emergency interconnects with the City of Port

Orange and two (2) emergency interconnects with both the City of Ormond Beach and Holly

Hill.

Alternative Water Supply:

In 2005, the St. Johns River Water Management District's Water Supply Plan,

projected that some locations within the district would experience withdrawal rates that will

likely approach or reach their sustainable limits within the next 20 years. Therefore, the

District identified Water Supply Development Project options and Water Resource

Development projects that will help to meet future water supply needs. South Daytona's

water supplier, Daytona Beach, had several projects identified in the 2005 plan. This project

included the Daytona Beach reclaimed water reservoir, the reclaimed water pipeline and

modifications to the reclaimed water system. Additionally, Daytona Beach investigated an

Aquifer Storage and Recovery facility (ASR) as a possible alternate water source. The City

of South Daytona is also included in this plan and the only project outlined at this time is a

reclaimed water distribution system.

220f29

According to a report called the "City of Daytona Beach Water Treatment and Supply

Report" prepared by Tetratech, Inc. in 2006, Daytona Beach had an existing firm raw water

well field capacity of 28.2 MGD. Firm service pumping capacity is estimated to be 58.2

MGD, and the total water treatment plant's capacity is approximately 24.0 MGD. The same

report states that the 2025 projected potable water demand will not exceed the firm capacity

of the current well field. Therefore, no new Floridan aquifer wells are anticipated within that

timeframe.

Potable and Reclaimed Water System:

Existing Potable Water System:

The City of South Daytona owns the potable water distribution system within the

City. This distribution system contains approximately 40 miles of water mains sizing from 6-

inch to 14-inch. The system has three (3) metered connection points to the City of Daytona

Beach's water distribution system. Two of these connections are metered 12-inch mains

and the third is a metered 14-inch main.

The City of South Daytona has been very proactive in the operation and

maintenance of the potable water distribution system. Leak detection services are engaged

at regular intervals to determine the structural condition of the water system. This service

entails the use of companies and underground leak detection testing devices to determine

the location and quantity of possible leaks to be repaired. Due to this proactive program,

even with the 40 plus miles of water mains, the City experiences minimal losses of water

throughout the system.

The potable water supply system is also under a proactive repair and replacement

program. As the City performs roadway improvements, distribution lines are evaluated and

many times replaced depending on the condition and the materials used in the construction

of the pipe. Within the potable distribution system, there are approximately 70% PVC pipe,

30% asbestos cement pipe and 10% ductile iron pipe. Due to the high maintenance costs

and the propensity of asbestos cement pipe to break, the City has an active program to

replace this type of pipe when ever doing work in the right-of-way where this type of pipe is

located.

The main source of revenue for the operation and maintenance of the City of South

Daytona's potable water distribution system is funds generated by the retail sale of water.

Some funding is also available in the redevelopment area through County and State funds.

230f29

However, the funding is limited and may only be used in specific areas within the City of

South Daytona.

As stated earlier in this report, the supply of potable water for the City of South

Daytona is purchased through a wholesale agreement with the City of Daytona Beach. This

agreement has evolved over the years and has been written to include costs for operation

and maintenance of the water treatment plant in Daytona Beach and also a portion of repair

and replacement of the distribution system within the City of Daytona Beach which transmits

water to one of the three entry points into South Daytona. The agreement also includes a

wholesale bulk rate for the treated water, which in turn is sold on a retail level to residences

and businesses in South Daytona. This agreement is reviewed on an annual basis to

ensure that the agreement is fair and equitable for both South Daytona and Daytona Beach.

Proposed Water Facilities Capital Improvements:

At this time the only proposed potable water distribution system improvements are

the replacement of the six-inch potable water line on Foxcroft Lane, the extension of the

City's Nova Road water main to the recently annexed City-streets. and the construction of a

chlorine booster station all in fiscal year 2008/2009 .

The 6-inch potable water line on Foxcroft lane is being replaced as part of a roadway

improvement which will raise Foxcroft Lane approximately 18 inches to avoid flooding

problems that have consistently occurred on this road since its construction. The Nova

Road water main project involves the extension of the City's water main to the recently

annexed City-streets west of Nova Road; Sheri Boulevard, Palm View Drive, and Cutters

Way. This extension will provide potable water to residential and commercial properties

along those streets.

The City has experienced a few instances when the potable water supply received

from Daytona Beach has had a low chlorine level. When this occurred, the City had to issue

a City-wide boiled water notice until levels were corrected . To avoid this situation in the

future , South Daytona is proposing the installation of a chlorine booster station and a

reci rculation pump to raise chlorine levels throughout the City before they drop to an

unacceptable level. The City of Daytona Beach has committed to installing a chlorine

booster station with the understanding that South Daytona would operate and maintain.

South Daytona would also install a recirculation pump to move potable water to ensure the

chlorine from the booster station would reach all parts of our City. This project is shown in

the CIS for fiscal year 2008/2009.

24 of29

As stated earlier, South Daytona's potable supply distribution system is in very good

condition and with the addition of two large water mains that intersect the City and follow the

southern perimeter of the City limits. The system's water pressures and firefighting

capabilities have given it the highest rating in the Public Protection Classification (PPC)

program sponsored by the Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO).

Potable Water Local Interconnects:

At the time of this report, South Daytona's potable supply system only has

interconnects with the City of Daytona Beach. In 1996, South Daytona constructed the

"South Loop Waterline", which is a 12-inch PVC line which runs the full length of the

southern city limits of South Daytona and ties a 14-inch water main on Nova Road to a 10-

inch line within the South Daytona Industrial Park. During the construction of this line, they

10-inch stub out was constructed in the area of Alexander Avenue, in Port Orange, to

accommodate the future local interconnect with South Daytona's potable distribution system

and Port Orange's system. To date the physical connection has not been made.

Also another potable supply interconnect was proposed by the local water Authority

between South Daytona and Port Orange along Nova Road in the southern portion of the

City. This interconnect is not being pursued at this time due to objections from Daytona

Beach.

Coordination with Potable Water Suppliers:

Daytona Beach is currently the only potable water and reclaimed water supplier for

the City of South Daytona. As per a water and wastewater contract recently updated in

February 2005. the City of South Daytona and Daytona Beach have worked closely to

insure an adequate and un-interrupted potable water supply and wastewater treatment and

will continue to do so in concert with the Intergovernmental Coordination Element policies 4-

1 and 4-2. The two Cities have had a good working relationship for many years and are

both members of the East Volusia Regional Water Authority. Regular meetings are held for

this board and provide an excellent means of communication, planning and discussing

operational issues with the potable supply and distribution system.

Water Supply Conservation Practices:

The City of South Daytona has historically and will continue to enforce the City's

standard procedures for limiting water use in times of water shortage as declared by the St.

250f29

Johns River Water Management District or by the City Counci l. The Ci ty will also continue

to enforce the City's water conservation regulati ons in accordance with Volusia County

minimum performance standards:

a. that limit hours for yard irrigation.

b. that reguire on-si te recharge of HVAC system water.

c. that require automatic shut-off nozzles for hoses.

d. that require care in use of water for other domestic activities.

South Daytona also provides information on water conservation methods through

publications such as the City newsletter and other water conservation practices. In January

2009, the City enacted a "Low Flow Toilet Rebate Program" that reimburses up to $100.00

towards replacement of toilets installed prior to 1991 for both Commercial and Residential

water customers. The City will continue to implement water savinq incentive programs and

furnish its customers with water saving tips through the quarterly City News Letter.

Approach to the Use of Reclaimed Water:

As part of the water supply agreement most recently updated in February 2005 with

Daytona Beach, the City of South Daytona has agreed to language that requires Daytona

Beach to provide South Daytona an unlimited amount of reclaimed water based on

availability, and at no charge to South Daytona. The agreement states that "Daytona Beach

will provide without charge reclaimed water to South Daytona at mutually agreeable

locations in such guantities as are available with South Daytona bearing all costs (including

transmission. storage and pumping costs) from the pOint(s) of connection". Back in 1992,

the City of South Daytona contracted with Briley Wild & Associates to provide a Master

Reclaimed Water Plan for the City. This plan was a genuine attempt to start the City of

South Daytona down the path of providing reclaimed water to the City. However, due to

logistical problems within the City of Daytona Beach's reclaimed water system the plan has

only come to fruition in the past year.

South Daytona is fully committed to the use of reclaimed water as an "alternative

water supply" (AWS) for irrigation along the commercial corridor of Ridgewood Avenue and

City buildings and parks. The initial use of the AWS for irrigation is in the Ridgewood

Avenue Commercial corridor. The implementation of this three phase project will entail the

installation of a total of approximately 14,000 feet of 8" reclaimed water mains capable of

utilizing up to 0.48 million gallons per day of reclaimed water for irrigation (see Figure 4.3).

260f29

NORlH

Phase I 3900' @ 0.14 mgd rv 36 gp fit Phase II 6200' @ 0.22 mgd Phase III 3400' @ 0.12 mgd

13,500' 0.48 mgd

RIDGEWOOD AVENUE CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY

PHASE I 0.14 mgd RECLAIM WATER COMPLETED 2009

PHASE II 0.22 mgd RECLAIM WATER

PHASE III 0.12 mgd RECLAIM WATER

FIGURE 4-3

The first phase of the reclaimed water system for South Daytona is the construction

of an 8-inch reclaimed water line starting at the northern City limits and traveling south along

the Ridgewood Avenue right-of-way to Big Tree Road . This first phase of the reclaimed

water program is outlined in the Capital Improvements Schedule (CIS) for fi scal year

2008/2009. This first section when fully operational will use approximately 0.14 million

gallons per day of reclaimed water for the landscape medians and right-of-way along with

businesses that front Ridgewood Avenue and the City Hall Complex.

The City has also recently contracted the services of Quentin Hampton &

Associates, a local engineering firm, to update the 1992 Master Reclaimed Water Plan.

This new update's main emphasis is in the area of parks and commercial properties and the

usage for single-family residential properties will be addressed in the final phases. The

ultimate goal for South Daytona is to have in place a distribution system for reclaimed water

that will be able to utilize all of the available reclaimed water produced.

Reclaimed Water Availability:

Currently Daytona Beach has a relatively large reclaimed water infrastructure and

distribution system. However, the supply of reclaimed water generated by the Daytona

Beach Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility exceeds the average reclaimed water

needs. Currently Daytona Beach uses on an average about 50% of their available

reclaimed water. Any additional treated reclaimed water not utilized for irrigation is

currently discharged into the Halifax River. This excess amount of available reclaimed

water will be the supply for the reclaimed water system within the City of South Daytona. In

2008, the City of Daytona Beach will discharge approximately 6.0 million gallons per day on

an annual average in the Halifax River. Daytona Beach will continue to expand their

reclaimed water system; it is currently projected that approximately 2 million gallons per day

of reclaimed water will be available for the City of South Daytona. With that availability and

the projected needs for South Daytona, this will be adequate to help achieve the goals set

by the City for an effective, comprehensive reclaimed water distribution system.

Proposed Reclaimed Water Capital Improvements:

The current study being prepared by Quentin Hampton & Associates will help to

establish reclaimed water rates and set up a utility fund for the operation, maintenance and

expansion of the reclaimed water distribution system. The tentative plan for the expansion

of the reclaimed water system is to provide reclaimed water for the landscaped islands and

280f29

adjacent commercial properties for the Ridgewood Avenue corridor and also to provide

reclaimed water for City parks.

The first phase currently under construction was funded by a Florida Department of

Environmental Regulation grant of $200,000 in matching funds from the City of South

Daytona of approximately $67,000. Phase II is budgeted in the CIP for fiscal year

2009/2010 . Future phases of the reclaimed water system will be funded by either grant

monies or money from the City Utility Services Fund.

Reclaimed Water Distribution System:

As mentioned earlier in the report, the first phase of the reclaimed water distribution

system is projected to be up and running by early 2009. From this first phase, expansion of

the system will proceed south along the Ridgewood Avenue corridor to include all green

space within the right-of-way and adjacent businesses. The second area of expansion for

the reclaimed water system will be to provide reclaimed water to the City parks. It has not

been ultimately determined by the City if it will pursue the service of single-family residential

lots within the City for reclaimed water at this time. The ultimate decision will be made in the

future and will be determined by reclaimed water availability, operational construction costs

and determined maintenance for the system.

290f29

ATTACHMENT A

City of South Daytona - December 2008 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE, 2008-2013

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT UPDATE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

ACTIVITY PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED 5-YR. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CODE FY 08/09-1 FY 09/10-2 FY10/11-3 FY 11/12i4 FY 12113--5 TOTAL

PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. , .. : , 'i '

Infiltration/Inflow Sewer Retrofit SI 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 250000 funding: Utility Fund, Operating Revenues, COBG .~ .{""

. ' ,:, .

Reuse Water, Phase-I (CRA)·* SI 267000 " ). 267000 funding: DEP (CIBR) & Utility Fund ;;, ,·r: .. .

.; ",' ,'.

Reuse Water, Phase II (eRA)*· SI ':;. ... '". 375000 .. ;' . ... ' 375000

funding" Grants & Redev Trust Fund .... .< ,;;;,

f ,. , ; .

Lift Station Improvements (CRA)·· SI I

Pump Station, #9 Area '. ::. 429000 429000 funding: impact fees . .. ......... I

, . ' ;

Lift Station Improvements (eRA)·'" SI . ', '. ' .

Pump Station, #8 Area .i: 571000 571000 funding: impact fees ·F. .' '.': :~; .'

". '. .

Lift Station Improvements (eRA)·· SI ; :';.: ,

Pump Station. #1 Area :r .:; ,,;'; 1500000 1500000 funding: impact fees ?' . i,

,;f',.

Sidewalks/Bikeways, City-Wide SI 15000 15000 15000 16000 15000 75000 funding: impact fees & proportionate fair-share contributions

West Nova Rd. Sewer Main SI . ; 110000 .... 110000 funding: Utility Fund. Reserves '.; . .. ;

•

;

Totals, this sheet (1): 332000 175000 440000 65000 2565000 3577000 Activity Code: SI Service Improvement, M = Maintenance, NG = New Growth, 0 = DefiCiency


CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT UPDATE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED 5-YR.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Activity Code FY 08/09-1 FY 09/10-2 "'Fv10/11~3 FY 11/12-4 FY 12113~5 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ~ ,:c

Palm Grove Sewer/Water System SI 601049 601049 funding: State Revolv Loan/Charges

New Public Works Headquarters NG ,l,- ee , .. '.·5200000 520'0000 funding: tax-exempt loan ..

-:;:'

Sauls St./Reed Canal Rd. Traffic Signal .... 250000 250000 funding: County roadway impact fees & proportionate fair-share contributions

-;·'c'

Foxcroft Drainage Retrofit SI 329168 329168 funding: Stormwater Utility ::;-,."

, '. Blue Villa Pond Site Const SI 1764000 " 1764000 funding: DEP (TMDL) Grant, DEP (CIBR), + Stjohn's .

Gary Blvd. Lift Station Purchase SI 150000 150000 funding: Impact fees & Utility Reserves

Segrave Stormwater Improvements SI 55000 55000 funding: CDBG

.. .-,-"

Chlorine Booster Station SI 80000 60000, funding: City of DB Grant

West Nova Rd. Water Main SI 750000 750000 funding: Utility Fund, Reserves

Totals, this sheet (2): 1065217 2664000 ·0 5450000 0 9179217 Totals, sheets (1) + (2): 1397217 2839000 440000 5515000 2565000 12756217 Activity Code: SI = Service Improvement, M = Maintenance, NG = New Growth, D = DefiCiency


CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT UPDATE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACTIVITY PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED ,5-YR.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CODE FY 08/09-1 FY09110-2 FY 10/11-3 FY 11/12-4 FY 12113-5 ' TOTAL

"

Redevelopment Dept.

U.S.-1 Corridor, Phase II 2000000 -f "

::( '. - " 2000000 Section A (CRA)(TCEA) SI ,~ ," , ,},-,-- :

funding: Redevelcpment Trust Fund & proportionate fair-share contributions ", '", .{ ,:,

" " " '

,~: ,

Halifax River Dredglng** SI I 1133000 ~ '- !, 1133000 funding: Redev.Trust Fund, FIND,+developer contributions .!' " '. " ' ':>,'

" ::1-:-'-' •. ..

Parkland Acquisitlon** SI , '2900000 2900000 funding: FRDAP+ECHO+Redev Trust

,

, ' "

,

,

} ,~

"

. ' . .

.

:

iTotals, this sheet (3): 1133000 " 2000000 0 2900000 0 6033000 Totals, sheets (1)+ (2) + (3): 2530217 4839000 440000 8415000 2565000 18789217 Activity Code: SI = Service Improvement, M = Maintenance, NG = New Growth, D = DefiCiency

FIVE·YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE. 2008·2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT UPDATE. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Activity PROJECTED PROJECTED ~ROJECTED :PROJECTED PROJECTED 5-YR. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Code FY 08/09-1 FY09/10-2 FY 10/11 .. 3 fFY 11/12-4 FY 12113·5 TOTAL

PARKSI REC. DEPT. , ,;

Reed Canal Park Dev., Phase·1II SI 60000 60000 funding: FRDAP & ECHO ,1,

. '. ' . I

So. Da}'tona Senso_ry Park SI 400000 .; ;-; Ii .... 400000 funding: FRDAP & ECHO .' .'. i)

. '

." :. t .... .

Central Park Development SI 45000 .' 355000 ,·.400000 funding: FRDAP & ECHO ,;:

, Stevens Canal Park Dev. SI .... 400000 400000 funding: FRDAP & ECHO " ..

;

Wagner Park Upgrade SI It. 400000 400000 funding: FRDAP & ECHO . I;

. ' ii' . .,

Melodle Park Improvements SI .. . 400000 ~ j . ··.· .. 400000 funding: FRDAP & ECHO " .' 3<:

.' , , :. '; . I'v . '.

-..\

Riverfront Park Improvements·· SI .: 400000 It, .. 4000001 funding: FRDAP & ECHO + CRA '.' -' !,:,,--

.. , ' .

•• Denotes location in Redevelopment District (CRA) .-

-"

Totals, this sheet (4): 505000 ·355000 ·800000 j . 400000 400000 2460000 Tot. sheet(1)(2)(3)(4}: 3035217 5194000 1240000 8815000 2965000 21249217

Activity Code: SI = Service Improvement. M = Maintenance. NG = New Growth, D = Deficiency

ATTACHMENT B

TECHNICAL PUBLICATION SJ2006-2B

ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY PLAN

2005

SECOND ADDENDUM

DECEMBER II, 2007

Technical Publication SJ2006-2B

St. Johns River Water Management District District Water Supply Plan

2005

Second Addendum December 11, 2007

St. Johns River Water Management District Palatka, Florida

2008

•

South Florida Water Management

District

The St. John.<; River Water Management District (SJRWMD) was created by the Florida Legislature in 1972 to be one of five water management districts in FJorida. It includes all or part of 18 countit."S in northeast Florida. The mission of SJRWMD is to ensure the sustainable use and protection of water resources for the benefit of the people of the District and the state of Florida. 5JRWMD accomplishes its mission through regulation; applied reseilrch; assistance to federal, state, and local governments; operation and maintenance of water control works; and land acquisition and management.

This document is published to disseminate inionnation collected by 5JRWMD in pursuit of its mission. Copies of this document can be obt."\ined from:

Library 51. Jolms Rh'er Water Management District

4049 Reid Street • P.O, Box 1429 Palatka, FL32178-1429

Phone: (386) 3294132

District Water Supply Plan 2005--Second Addendum

DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY PLAN

2005

SECOND ADDENDUM

DECEMBER 11, 2007

The St. Johns River Water Management District (5JRWMD) approved its District Water Supply Plan 2005 (DWSP 2005) on February 7, 2006. DWSP 2005 has been published by 5JRWMD as Technical Publication 5J2006-2. The 5JRWMD Governing Board approved an addendum (first addendum) to DWSP 2005 on October 10, 2006. A second addendum to DWSP 2005 was approved on December 11,2007. This second addendum to DWSP 2005 is important because the revised information contained within tables is (1) directly linked to the water supply entity notification process, which is required pursuant to Section 373.0361, Florida Statutes; (2) required for 5JRWMD's Water Protection and 5ustainability Program; and (3) essential in 5JRWMD's efforts to develop technical assistance documents for local governments to use in updating their comprehensive plans to address water supply issues, including the identification of alternative and traditional water supply projects necessary for meeting the water supply needs within their jurisdictions. Following are enumerated changes to DWSP 2005 associated with this second addendum.

Table 13. Quantities and estimated costs of alternative water supply development projects. As presented in this second addendum to DWSP 2005, the proposed quantity and estimated costs for project number 4, Ormond Beach Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project, are modified to increase the. quantity from 2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 4 mgd, to increase the construction cost from $10.90 million to $14.62 million, and to increase the total project cost from $12.02 million to $15.82 million. Table 13, as it is included in this addendum, supersedes Table 13 in DWSP 2005 and in the first addendum to DWSP 2005.

Table 15. Status of water supply development projects. As presented in this addendum, Table 15 includes a change in the proposed quantity of water associated with the Ormond Beach Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project from 2 mgd to 4 mgd. Table 15, as it is included in this addendum, supersedes Table 15 in DWSP 2005 and in the first addendum to DWSP 2005.

St. Johns River Water Management District 5

O'I~

~ I Table 13. Quantities and estimated costs of alternative water supply development projects S tn

;:..;, ~.

~ ,.-... ~ ;::t

~ ::. ;::t

~ 9. v,

3'. !:l.

DWSP Project Number

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15

16 17

Capacity

Project Name Average

Construction Daily Flow (in millions) (mgd)

Brackish Groundwater Source for Potable Use Dunes Community Development District Brackish Ground'vvater Project 1,00 $9,50 East Putnam RegiOnal water System Project 0,63 $10.91 Melbourne Reverse Osmosis (RO) Plant Expansion 2,5C $4.80 Ormond Beach Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project 4.00 $14.62 ~. Augustine Water Supply Project 5,00 $12,80 St. Johns Cou~ Water SU[J!JIy P..!Qject 6,66 $20.00

Brackish Groundwater Subtotals 19.79 $72.63 Surface Water Source for Potable Use

Lower Ocklawahp River in Putnam County Project 20,00 $201.00 St. Johns River Near SR 50 Project 10,DC $76,00 St. Johns River Near Lake Monroe Project 50. DC $387.56 St. Johns River Near DeLand Project 20.00 $182.58 st. Johns River Near Lake George Project 33.0C $313.0C St. Johns RiverfTaylor Creek Reservoir Water Supply Project 40,OC $174.00

Surface Water Subtotals 173.00 $1334.14 Seawater Source for Potable Use

Indian River Lagoon at FP8L Cape Canaveral Power Plant Project 15.0C $111.00 Indian River Lagoon at Reliant Energy Power Plant Project 15.0C $113,00 Intracoastal Waterway at New Smyma Beach Project 15.0C $134.00

Seawater Subtotals 45,OC $358.00 Reclaimed water Source

Alafaya' (Utilities Inc. of Florida) Reclaimed Water Storage and High Service Pumps Project 0.41 $20')

Altamonte Springs and Apopka Project RENEW APRICOT 6,63 $1119

Estimated Costs Operation

Total and capital Maintenance

(In millions) (in millions per year)

$10,4C $0,183 $11.22 $0.400

$5,8C $2.827 $15.82 $0.427 $14,70 $1,980 $22.00 $2.000 $79.94 $7.82

$266.00 $5.790 $95.00 $4.350

$505,68 $21.003 $239.52 $8,578 $402.0( $13.670 $215.OC $11.830

$1723.2C $65.22

$140.00 $7.510 $141.00 $8.100 $168.00 $8.840 $449.00 $24.45

$2.4.<1 $0.033 $13,52 $0,195

Unit Production (cost per

1,000 gallons)

$2,65 $5,39 $3.~

$0.69 $1,69 $1,51

$3.16 $3,01 $3,04 $3,40 $3.39 $1,871

$3.4:'l $3.51 $4.05

$1.2f $O.4E

a iii' q [ :E Q)

$' ..., (IJ c: "C "C -< ""0 Qj' ::::I J\)

8

! 8 ::::I 0.

» 0. 0. Q) ::::I 0. c: 3

V> :'" --~ ;i V>

'" ~.

~ ~ ~

i g -CJ ;;;.

'J g:"

Table 13-Continued

DWSP Project Project Name Number

18 Apopka and Winter Garden Reuse Partnership Project

Belleview and Spruce Creek Golf Course Reclaimed water System 19 Expansion Project

Beverly Beach Integrated Reclaimed Water and Stormwater Reuse 20 Project, Phase II

21 Clermont Reclaimed and Stormwater System Expansion Project 22 ~ocoa/Rockledge Reclaimed Water Line Connection Project 23 Daytona Beach Reclaimed Water System Project 24 DeLand Reclaimed Water and Surface Water Augmentation Proiect

25 Eastem Orange and Seminole Counties Regional Reuse Project Edgewater Reclaimed Water System Interconnect to Southeast

26 Volusia County Project 27 Eustis Reclaimed Water System Expansion and AUQmentation Project 28 FlaQler County Bulow Reclaimed Water System Proiect 29 Holly Hill Reuse System to Ormond Beach

30 Lady Lake Phase II Reclaimed Water System Lake Utility Services (Utilities Inc. of Florida) Lake Groves WVVTF

31 Reclaimed Water System Expansion Project 32 Leesburg Reclaimed water Reuse Project 33 Melbourne Reclaimed Water System Expansion Project 34 Minneola Reclaimed Water Reuse Project

35 Mount Dora Country Club Golf Course Reclaimed Water Project North Seminole Regional Reclaimed water and Surface Water

36 Optimization System Expansion and Optimization Project 37 Ocoee Reuse System Expansion Project 38 Orange County Northwest Reclaimed Water Project 39 Orange County Southeastern Reclaimed Water System Expansion

Capacity Average

Construction Daily Flow (in millions) (mgd)

3.00 $4.31

1.00 $1.6-4

0.5C $2.25

5.10 $18.77 0.25 $1.07

26.00 $20.33 1,70 $4.83

20.00 $28.94

1.0C $5.2'': 1.1C $1.8/ 1.7C $1.7 { O,Be $O.4C 0.50 $2.00

1.0C $3.60 7.05 $23.02 1.50 $4,03 1.00 $7.78 0.26 $0.33

7.76 $8.7€ O.3E $2.3-; 3.0C $10.0C

12.5C $13.21


Total and Capital Maintenance

(in millions) (in millions peryeart

$5.21 $0.071

$2.37 $0.032

$2.6-4 $0.049

$22.68 $0.923 $1.29 $0.021

$25.41 $1.826 $5.5: $0.328

$28.9-4 $0.364

$6.3C $0.146 $2.2€ $0.09€ $2.1-4 $0.185 $0.49 $0.041:1 $2.20 $0.22g

$4.35 $0.219 $27.8') $0.33-4

$4.8 $0.373 $11.4E $0.140

$0.4C $0.021

$10.3C $0.505 $2.66 $0.001

$10.2!3 $0.300 $13.21 $0,351

Unit Productior (cost per

1,000 gallons)

$0.3€

$0.5:

$1.21:1

$1.21:1 $1.1-4 $0.36 $1.15

$0.32

$1.49 $0.60 $0.53 $0.36 $2.05

$1.4~

$O.SE $1.3C $1.01 $0.4£

$0.43 $1.33 $0.81 $0.27

o

~ Sl ~ Il)

(j) ... CJ) C "0 "0 -< -U iii" :J

N o o

! (I)

§ c..

6: a. (I) :J a. c 3

00(,1) ;---

;:Il ~. ....

~ ;:; ....

~ ;s

~ 3 ~ o 0;'

~.

Table 13-Continued

DWSP Capacity

Project Project Name Average

Number DaifyFlow

(rngd)

40 Orlando Utilities Commission Project RENEW 9.2 41 Ormond Beach North Peninsula Reclaimed Water storage Project 0.4~ 42 Ormond Beach South Peninsula Reuse Improvement Project 2.13 43 Palm Coast Reclaimed Water System Expansion Project 8.2::1 44 Port Orange Airport Road Reclaimed Water Transmission Main Project 1.00 45 Port Orange Pioneer Trail storage and Pumping Facility Project 2.0C 46 Port Orange Reclaimed Water Reservoir and Recharge Basin Project 27C 47 Rockledge Reclaimed Water Storage Project 0.1E 48 Rockledge Reclaimed Water System Expansion - ASR Project 0.55 49 South Daytona Reclaimed water System Expansion Project 0.1..:1 50 rravares Reclaimed water Treatment System Expansion Project 0.6e 51 Volusia County Southwest Reclaimed Water System Project 0.2C 52 West Melbourne Above Ground Reclaimed Water Storage Tank 2.413 53 Winter Garden Reclaimed Water Pumping and Transmission Project 4.00

Reuse Subtotals 137.79

Reuse Augmentation Source

54 Lake Apopka Reuse AUQmentation Project 1~OC Seminole County Yankee Lake Reclaimed Water System

55 Augmentation Project 10.0C University of Central Florida (UCF) Reclaimed Water arid Stormwater

56 Integration Project 0.41 57 Winter Park Windsong stormwater Reuse Demonstration Project 0.10

~nter Springs - Lake Jessup Reclaimed Water Augmentation 58 Project 2.25

Reuse Augmentation Subtotals 13.76


Construction Total and

(in millions) Capital Maintenance

(in millions) (in millions per year)

$51.9 $62.7!: $1.612 $2.4€ $2.9, $0.142 $8.2C $9.91 $0.19"1

$13.91 $16.61 $1.23~

$1.6C $1.9 $O.08C $2.3~ $2.8 $0.182 $8.78 $10.01: $0.107 $1.613 $2.0~ $0.01:3 $2.01 $2.42 $0.045 $0.7 $0.67 $0.011 $4.71 $5.69 $0.048 $1.1E $1.4" $0.016 $2.51 $2.76 $0.1OC

$14.4C $17.40 $0.49€ $296.12 $348.46 $11.07

$7.27 $8.79 $0.11~

$25.013 $31.36 $3.156

$0.88 $1.06 $0.052 $0.43 $0.5~ $0.030

$6.7C $6.70 $0.100 $40.31: $48·4~ ~.50

' Unit Productior (cost per

1,000 gallons)

$1.61: $1.9~

$1.OE $0.77 $0.56 $0.50 $0.82 $2.36 $1.25 $1.32 $1.66 $1.46 $0.31 $1.09

$1.9E

$1.43

$0.8C $1.7"

$0.75

o ~ ..., ~ :E t\)

(i) ..., (J) c: "C "C -< ""0 Q) ::J I'J o o

! (I)

8 ::J a..

~ (I)

a c: 3

!!! 0" :::-;:: .." ,., ;::;. r;; ... ~ 1f ~ ;:I

~ ~ ~ t:J ;;;.

~ [.

Table 13-Continued

Estimated Costs

DWSP Capacity Operation Unit

Project Project Name Average Construction Total and Production

Number Daily Flow (in millions)

Capital Maintenance (cost per (mgd) (in millions) (in millions 1,000

pervear) gallons)

Other I\-'herry Lake Tree Farm Lake Withdrawal for Agricultural Irrigation

59 Project 0.71 $O.BE $0.82 $0.06~ $0.4~

Holloway Farms Agricultural Irrigation Rainwater Collection System 60 Project o.oa $1.2fl $1.5e $0.002 $3.66

other Subtotals 0.85 $1.97 $2.37 $0.06

Alternative Water SUPRly~nt Projects Total 390.19 .~3.~ ~6!51-~ $112.12

mgd = million gallons per day Notes: Alternative water supply projects are defined. to the extent possible, on the basis of complete water production, treatment. storage. and transmission

systems. Complete projects may include several hydraulically connected major projects elements under single ownership.

Cost estimates are presented for various levels of project development, ranging from order of magnitude conceptual planning level to final design. Actual project costs will vary from these estimates, which are presented herein only to provide an overview of potential alternative water supply project costs.

Construction cost estimates may include construction contingencies as appropriate.

Total capital costs include estimated construction cost plus allowance for nonconstruction capital items, which may include land. land acquisition, planning, permitting, design, and services during construction. as applicable to a given project.

Cost totals for project categories have been rounded. Dollars are in millions for construction. total capital, and operation and maintenance.

o fir s: Sl. ~ Q)

Cii .., (fJ c: '0 '0 -< "0 i» ::J

N o o

! <Tl o g 0.

» 0. 0. ro ::J 0. c: 3

District Water Supply Plan 2005-Second Addendum

Table 15, Slalus o/waler supply development projects

projects

Dunes Communlly Development District I!ract<istl Groundwaler Project

East Putnam Regional Water System Project

Melbourne RO Pleni Elq)anslon

Onnond Sesch Trea~1 Plant Expansion Project

51. Augustine Water $uppjy Pfoject

51. Johns Counly

Lower Ocklawaha River in Putnam County Project

St Johns River Neat SR 50 Project

St. Johns River Near lake Monroe Project

SI. Johns River Near DeLand Project

SI. Johns River Near lake G8OfOt! Project

S .. Johns RiverfT aytOl' Creek Reservoir Water Supply Project

Indian Rille, lagoon at FP&l Cape Conaveral Power Planl Project

Indian Rive. lagoon al Reliant Ene'llY Power Plant Project

St. 1'''#'I1~ /(1tJ(r W.Ilt'T MI1/Mgnm'ttt l)'~/"(1

10

MulIf.. Selededfor /urisdiclional Enllly I~-

no yes

no yes

00 yes .. - ryes -----

no

no yes

no yes

"to be no det<!fmined

"lObe no delermined

no yes

'to be no determined

'to be no determined

yes yes

'lobe no detennined

"lobe no determined

--------

PYoject E~ project Sponsor{a) PRJPOI'Id Quantity Funding So........ Permitting ComINctlon PlwmW>g De. llradcith GIou_ ... So........ for Potable Ute

Dunes Conmwnily Development \,OOmgd Dunes Community Development [)jatrict, WPSP Complete In progress Complete 2005-2007 [)jstricl funds requeSled

Putnam County 0,93 mgd U,S, Oop""",,,nl of Agriculture Rural p""p"'te Inp«,gm. In progreso 2005-2007 Development Fund, Florida Cop_t 01 En"lt_tal Protecllon grant, WPSP funds requOlted

i City 01 Melbourne 2,5Qmgd City 01 Melbourne, WPSP funds requested 2006 2008 2008-2009 2009-20tO

ClIy 01 0_ aeach 4.00mgd City of Onnond a...ch, WPSP fund. requested 2005 2005-2008 2008 2006-2007 I

City of SI. Augustine 6.00mgd City of SI. Augustine, WPSP funds requeSled Complete In progress In pr<lllfOSl 2008-2007

51. Johns Couniy 8.00 mgd SI. Johns County, WPSP fund. requesled Complete In prognIas In progreal 2005-2006

S_ W_ Souroe for Potable Use

to be identifled 20.00 mgd to be identifled Nots_uled Nol scheduled

__ uled

Nots_uled

to be identifted up 1010.00 mgd to be: identified Not scheduted NO! scheduled Not scIlIIduled Not scheduled

City 01 Sonford 2 mgd (up 10 50.00 mgd City 01 Sanford, WPSP 'unds requested tnprogress 2006 2006 2001-2008 lotal avsUable)

to be idenlifled up 10 20.00 mgd to be identified Not._uled Not._uled _ sclllld uled Not scIlIIduilld

to be identified up to 33,00 "'lId 10 be idenlif",d Not._uIIId Nol scheduled NO! scllllduled Not scheduled

CHyof Cocoa, City of nusvilie, up 10 40.00 mgd Project sponsors, Stale and Tribal Assislance 2005-2006 2006-2009 2006-2009 2010-2012 Eest Central Florida 5ervlces Granl (STAG), WPSP funds reque.led tnc .. Orange County, Orlando UUlltte. Commieston, South Florida Wat ... Managemenl [)jslriel, SI. Johns River Water Management Dlslrict, T oho Water Authorily

5e_ Sourc. for Potable UN

to be identified up to 30.00 "'lId 10 be identified Not scIlIIduled _ scheduled

Nol scheduled Not scheduled

10 be identified up 10 30.00 "'lId to be identified _ scheduled Not scIleduled Not scIleduled Not_uled

L"" .. -------- .,,-,,-----

Table 15-Continu&d

Multi- s.lededfor Projeds iun.dlcdonal Project Sponsor(s)

Enllly ImpIernenIallon

Intracoastal Wal<>rwav at New Smyrna "lObe no 10 be idenlifie<l Beach Project dete,mined

Alafaya Utllrues R __ Wat'" no yeo Utilities!oc, of Florida (S_) Siorage and High SeMce Pumps

Altamonte Springs and Apopka Project yes yes Altamonte Spri"ll". Apopka RENEW APRICOT

Apopka and Winter Garden (or yes yes Apopka. Winter Garden North ...... Orange Counly) Regional Reuse PlII1nership Pmject

Belleview and Spruce ~ Golf no ye. 8eUeyiew Course Rodoimod Waler System Expansion

Beverly Beach Inlegrated Rodaimed no yes Flagler Counly Wate, and SIOrm ... I., Reuse Proje<:I. _II Clermont R_ and Stormwater no yes CItV of Clermont Syslem E--"'"

Co.:oaiRod<Iedgo Reclaimed Waler yes yes Gily of Cocoa, Cily of Rockledge LInB Conneclion

Daytona Beach Reclaimed Water no V·· Clly 01 Davlona Beach System

DeLand Re<;Iaime<I W_ and Suoiace no yes City of DeLand Water AugmenlaUon Pmject

Eastern Orange and Seminole Counlles yes yes City 01 Orlando, Orange Counly, Regional Reuse Projeci Ortando Ulililie. CommIssion,

Seminole County. Cilyof OvIedo. Unlvlll'sity of Central Florida

Edgewater Recla_ Water system no yes City of Edgewater tnt_1O SE Volusia County

EusUs Reclaimed Water System no yes City of Eustis expansion and AugmenlaIion

Flagler County Bulow Reuse Water no yes Flagle' Counly System

Holly Hil Reuse System to Ormond no yes Cijy of Holly HUt Beach

pmject Proposeda... ... uty Funding Source

Planning

15,oomgd 10 be identified Not scheduled

Redllimed Water Source

OAt mgd UtilKleslnc. 01 Florida (Seminole). WPSP funds omp!ete ,_sled

6.63mgd Project sponaors. WPSP funds 'equested Complele

3.00 mgd Project spons."... WPSP funds reque.ted 0lmpIeIe

LOOmgd Projecl SpotISOnI. WPSP funds requested GOmpOeI.

O.50mgd Flagler County. Rural Development. WPSP Complete funds reque.ted, others 10 be idenlifie<l

5.10mgd City 01 ao""""l. WPSP funds requ •• ted 004-2006

0,25 City of COC .... City of Rockledge. WPSP funds 2006 requested

26.00 CitV 01 Daytona Beach, WPSP funds requested f""'I""Ie

L70mgd City of DeLand, Florida FOlev., Trull Fund, ComiIfele WPSP II.Ind. requested

20.00 mgd Project partner •• State and T rlJal Aaslslan<:e Complete Grant (STAG), WPSP II.Inds requesled

1.00 mgd Cily of Edgewaler. WPSP lUnds requested !;OmpIele

1.10mgd C~y of EusU •• WPSP fund. requested Complete

1.10mgd Flagle, County. WPSP funds requesled Complele

0.60 mgd Cily 01 Holly Hill, WPSP funds requested ~e

- ---- ---

District Waler Supply Plan 2005-Second Addendum

E'ngIMemg De.

__ uled

Complete

2006

Not_uled

2005-2OIl6

2006

2005-2001

2006

2005-2006

Complel"

Complete

2006

2006-2008

2006-2007

2006-2007

Permitting CoMINdIon

Not scheduled Not scheduled

2006 2006

2006 2001

_scheduled Not scheduled

2006 2006-2001

2006 2006-2007

2006-2001 2007-2006

2006 2007

2006-2007 2007 2006

2004-2006 2004-2009

•

2007 2004-2007

2006-2007 2007

2007-2009 2009-2012

2007 2007 2006

2007 2008

51. 101,"5 Ri!Jt"r Wilt,.,. MQnagr1Mflt Vistncl 11

District Water Supply Plan 2005---Second Addendum

Table 15-Conlinued

Multi- SeIecIed lor PrcjecI EngiMering Projeels junldldional PrcjecI Spons~.) Propoled au_y Funding Source PermllIing ConsINctIon Entity Implementation PI_g Design

Lady Lake Phase II Reclaimed Water no yes Town of lady lake 0.50 mgd Town of Lady Lake, WPSP funds requested Complete 2006 2007 2008 2008 2009 System

lake UIHily Services Inc. (Utilities Inc, of no yes UIHilies Inc. of Florida 1.00mgd Utilities Inc. of Florida, WPSP funds requesled Complete 2ooS-2006 2006 2006-2007 Florida) Lake Groves WWTF Reclaimed Waler Expansion

!

Leesburg Reclaimed Water Reuse no yes City of Leesburg 7.10 mgd City of leesburg. WPSP funds requested Complete Complete 2006 2006-2007 Project i

Melbourne Reclaimed Waler Syslem no yes Cily of Melbourne 1.50 mgd City of Melbourne, WPSP funds requesled CompIele 200S-2006 2006 2006-2007 Expansion

Minneola Reclaimed Water Reu.e no yes City of Minneola 1.50 - 2.50 mgd City of Minneola, WPSP fundI requested Complete Complete Complete 200S-2006 Project

Mount Dora Country Club Golf Course no ye. Mount Dora Countoy Club 0.26 mgd Mount Dora Country Oub, WPSP funds omplele Not scheduled Not scheduled Not scheduled Redaimed Water Projecl requested

North Seminole Regional Reclaimed yes yes City of Sanford, City of lake 7.80 mgd Project partners, Florida Forever Trust Fund, Complele In progress In progress 200S-2009 Waler and Surface Water Augmentation Maoy, Seminole Counly WPSP funds requesled System Expansion and Optimization Project

Ocoee Reuse System E)I(panslon no yes City of Ocoee 0.35 mgd City of Ocoee, WPSP funds requested Complete 200S-2oo6 2006 2006

Orange County Northwest Redaimed no yes Orange County 3.00 mgd Orange Counly, WPSP funds requesled Complete 2006 2006-2007 2006-2010 Water Augmentation

Orange Counly Soulheastem yes yes Orange Counly, O~ando Ulillie. 12.50 mgd Orange County, WPSP funds requested Complete 200S-2006 2006-2008 2006-2010 Redaimed Water Syslem Expansion Commission, City of O~ando

Ol1aooo Utilities Convnission Project no yes 0118000 Utilities Commission 9.20mgd Orlando Ulitities Commission. WPSP funds 2ooS-2007 2008-2009 2009-2010 2009-2011 RENEW requested

Ormond Beach North Peninsula no yes City of Ormond Beach 0.49 mgd Cily of Ormond Beach, Florida Forever T rusl Complele In progress In progrosl 200S-2006 Redalmed Water Storage Project Fund, WPSP funds requested

Ormond Beach South Peninsula Reuse no yes City of Ormond Beach 2.13 City of Ormond Beach, WPSP funds requesled Complete 2006-2007 2006-2009 2007-2010 Improvements

Palm Coast New Redallned Water no ye. City of Palm Coast 8.23 City of Palm Coasl, WPSP fund. requested Complete 200S-2007 2006-2009 2006-2009 Syslem E.panslon

Port Orange Airport Road Redaimed no yes City of Port Orange 1.00mgd Cilyof Port Orange, WPSP funds reque.ted Complete Complele 2006 2006 Water Transmission Main

Port Orange Pioneer T raH Siorage and no yes City of Port Orange 2.00 mgd City of Port Orange, WPSP funds requesled Complete 2006 2008 2006 Pumping Facility

Port Orange Redaimed Water no yes City of Port Orange 2.70 mgd City of Port Orange. Florida Forever Trust Fund. Complete Complete Complele 2004-2006 Reservoir and Recharge Basin WPSP funds requesled

St. '..,'rns RW('r ~Vfl'('r MII"llgt'rtU"n' V'S,"" 12

District Water Supply Plan 2005-Second Addendum

Table 15-Conlinued

MulU-5eIedod ror Prqect Engineering Projects judsdidlonlll project S~'I propot<lCl QuanUly Funding Soun:e P.-tng ConaINc;tion

Entity Implementation P!WV1Ing Oeoign

Rockledge Redaimed Water Storage no yes City of Rockledge O.16mgd City 01 Rockledge, WPSP Ivnd. requested Complete Not scheduled Not sd>eduled Not scheduled

Rockledge Reclaimed Water System no yes City of Rockledge 0.55mgd Expansion - ASR

City of Rockledge. WPSP funds requested Complete CompIele 2005-2006 2006 I

South Daytona Reclaimed Water no yes City of South Daytona 0.1' mgd City 01 Soult! Daytona, WPSP Ivnds ,_sted CompIele 2005-2006 2006-2007 2006-2007 System Expansion

T ayares Reclaimed Water T ,ealment no yes City of Tavares 0.6 mgd City of Tav",es, WPSP funds requested 2006 2007 2007 2008 Syslem Expansion

VoIu'" County SW Reclaimed Water no yes VoIIJsla County 0.20 mgd VoI"sia County, WPSP Ivnd. requelled ompIele 2006 2006 2007 System

We.t Melbourne -. Gtound no yes City of We.t Melbourne 2.48 mgd City olWesl MaIO"""",, STAG funds, WPSP p>mr»ete 2006 2006 2006-2007 Reclaimed Water Storage T ani< funds ",quested

Winter Garden Reclaimed Water no yes City 01 W ... ter Garden 4.00mgd City of Winter Garden. WPSP fund. requested <.;ompIete 2005-2006 2006 2006-2006 Pumping and Transmis_

Reu" Augmenlallotl Source

Lake Apopka Reus. Augmentation no yes City of Apopka l.00mgd Cily of Apopka. WPSP funds ",quelted In progress Inprogresa 2006 2001-2006 Project

Seminole County Yankee lake no yes Seminole County 10.00 "'lId Seminole County, WPSP funds requested Complete 2006 2006 2006--2001 Reclaimed water System Augmentallotl

University of Central Florida (UCF) no yes Universlly of Central Florid. 0.41 mgd Unl.erslly 01 Central Florida. SJRWMD Complete 2006 2006 2006 Reclaimed Waler and Stormwat., Stonnw8ter Cosl·share Ivnd •• WPSP funds Integration requesled

Winter Park Windsong Stormwaler no yes City 01 WInter Park O.IOmgd City 01 WlIlt., Park, SJRWMO Stormwaler Cost· Complele 2006 2006 2006 Reuse Oemo share funds

WInter Springs Lake Jesup no yes City 01 Winter Springs 2.25mgd City of Willie< Springs. WPSP fund. requested 2006 2006 2006--2007 2006-2010 Reclaimed Water Augmentation

ou.er Cherry Lake Tree Farm Lake no yes Cherry Lake Tree Farm 0.77 mgd Cheny Lake Tree Farm, SJRWMD funds f""'P"'1e 2006 2006 2001 Wilhdrawal ",.. Agricultural Use requested

Hoiloway Farms Agricultural Rainwater no ye. Holloway F ann. 0.08 mgd Holloway Fann •• WPSP Ivnds requested NO! scheduled Not scheduled Not scheduled Not scheduled (;ojlection System

mgd = million gatlons per day

"Allhough the multijunsdictional status of these projects has been not been determined, SJRWMO anticipates that their development by mullijurisdictional water supply entilies will likely offer the greatest opportunity for their full development. Relatively small versions oItllese proje<:ts, which are to be developed by single entities, are Identified as part of lhese projects.

51.101"'$ XitifT Watrr Mauugt'ml'1u Drs-In'", 13

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION

ELEMENT

(Excerpts Only - Policy 2-9 to Policy 3-1)

where it adjoins residential land use designations in adjacent

jurisdictions, the City shall provide the adjacent jurisdiction

with prior written notice of any proposed land use or site plan

changes for the designated industrial areas, and adequate

time, based upon mutual consultation, to review and

comment on any proposed land use or site plan change for

those areas; and the City shall consider any review

comments from the adjacent jurisdiction through its land use

and site plan review process prior to approval of any such

change.

POLICY 2-9: The City will maintain a Water Supply Plan that is

coordinated with the Water Management District and the City

will update its Water Supply Plan within 18 months after the

Water Management District enacts an updated Regional

Water Supply Plan.

OBJECTIVE 3: South Daytona shall continue to enforce the

requirements for non-local agency approvals contained

in its Consolidated Land Development Regulations.

POLICY 3-1: Development orders including development plan approval

and issuance ot the Certificate-ot-Occupancy may not be

issued until any required non-local approvals have been

obtained.

Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

(Excerpts Only - Objective 3 to Policy 3-2(5))

OBJECTIVE 3: The Capital Improvements Element shall be used as a

means of meeting capital needs and providing a Capital

Improvements Schedule (CIS) which is coordinated with

land-use decisions.

POLICY 3-1: Adopt the schedule of capital improvements as part of the

City's annual operating and capital budget.

POLICY 3-2: The City shall continue to implement a concurrency

management plan which provides standards and guidelines

for approving development proposals as follows:

a. The level-of-service standards cited in

Objective 2 of the Capital Improvements

Element shall be the level-of-service standards

applied in the Concurrency Management Plan.

b. The issuance of development orders shall be

based on a finding that public facilities which

meet the adopted level-of-service standards

are available to serve the development at the

time the development impacts occur.

c. A public facility or service shall be determined

as available for potable water, sanitary sewer

solid waste and storm drainage if it meets any

of conditions one through three below. Park

and recreation service shall be determined as

available if any of conditions one through five

are met.

1. The facility/service is in place to serve a

proposed project at the time that a

development order is approved;

2. The facility/service will be in place at the

time of project impact;

3. The facility is under construction at the

time that a development order is

approved;

4. The facility/service is the subject of a

binding executed construction contract

that provides for the commencement of

the actual construction of the required

facilities within one year of the issuance

of the development order; however, the

faci lity/service shall be available no later

than the issuance of a certificate of

occupancy, or its functional equivalent.

5. The facility/service is guaranteed

through an enforceable development

agreement that provides for the

commencement of the actual

construction of the required facilities

within one year of the issuance of the

development order;

d. The traffic circulation network concurrency

requirements may be satisfied by complying

COASTAL ZONE ELEMENT

(Excerpts Only - Objective 1 to Objective 2)

GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

The Goals, Objectives and Policies which have been developed for the

Coastal Zone Element are intended to support the overarching community goal

which emerged for South Daytona's Strategic Planning process. The Goals,

Objectives and Policies of the Coastal Zone Element are subsumed within the

overarching community goal, and in combination with the Goals, Objectives and

Policies of the other Plan elements, contribute to the achievement of the

community goal. The Future Land Use Element. the Open Space and

Recreation Element, the Stormwater Drainage Sub-element, the Transportation

Element, and the Conservation Element are particularly linked to the Coastal

Zone Element.

GOAL: CONSERVE, PROTECT AND MANAGE THE COASTAL

RESOURCES OF VOLUSIA COUNTY AND SOUTH DAYTONA

INCLUDING THE WETLAND AND UPLAND ECOSYSTEM SO

AS TO MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE NATIVE HABITATS,

FLORAL AND FAUNAL SPECIES DIVERSITY, WATER

QUALITY AND NATURAL SURFACE WATER

CHARACTERISTICS.

OBJECTIVE 1. Continue to implement management programs to

ensure long-term protection and enhancement of

selected natural upland and wetland habitats and water

quality. The primary means of accomplishing this

objective will be through the retention of

Interconnected hydro-ecological systems where the

wetlands and uplands function as a productive unit

resembling the original landscape.

SUPPORTING POLICIES INCLUDE:

a.

b.

c.

GOAL:

Land Use Element policy 3-1

Public Utility Element policies 2-1, 2-6. 3-3. 4-4.5-5,5-6 and 5-7.

Conservation Element policies 1-6. 1-7, 2-2, 2-3, 2-5, and 3-5 and

Objectives 4 and 5 including all supporting policies.

TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND RESTORE COASTAL

RESOURCES BY MANAGING GROWTH AND LAND USE SO

AS NOT TO DAMAGE OR DESTROY THOSE RESOURCES.

OBJECTIVE 2. Continue to implement land use regulations that

provide for the location, extent and distribution of land

uses consistent with the protection of coastal

resources.

POLICY 2-1: Require special in-depth review of any development project

proposed for a wetland. This shall include clearance from

the 5t. Johns River Water Management District. It must be

demonstrated that any such project will not have a

significant negative impact on the flora and fauna of the

immediate area or on the Halifax River. The Consolidated

Land Development Regulations shall require that any such

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

(Excerpts Only - Policy 4-8 to Objective 6)

GOAL:

POLICY 4-8: To assure the full and timely availability of services, the City

shall issue its development orders in accordance with the

adopted concurrency management plan.

CREATE A REGULATORY SYSTEM WHICH SUPPORTS THE DESIRED

LAND USE PATTERN AND OTHER COMPONENTS OF THE

OVERARCHHG GOAL.

OBJECTIVE 5: Implement and annually review and update the

Consolidated Land Development Regulations ("unified

code") to regulate, at a minimum, the following types of

activity:

a. The use of land and water.

b. The subdivision of land.

c. Stormwater management.

d. Landscaping.

e. Tree preservation.

f. Signage.

POLICY 5-1: Continue the Development Review Committee (DRC) as a

mechanism for the review of development proposals. site

plans and construction plans.

POLICY 5-2: Provide and utilize a method of evaluating the fiscal impact

of proposed development as part of the development

approval process.

POLICY 5·3: The City shall encourage the elimination or reduction of land

uses inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map.

Accordingly. periodic revisions shall be conducted of all

inconsistent FLUM and zoning categories as well as any

inconsistent provisions of the Consolidated Land

Development Regulations.

POLICY 5-4: Prohibit the issuance of development orders which will

reduce the designated level-of-service for the affected public

facilities below the level adopted in the Comprehensive Plan

··with the exception of the any roadway level.of-service for

which there is an exemption within the Transportation

Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) of the CRA.

POLICY 5-5: Review the impacts on infrastructure and services to

determine conformance to the Future Land Use Map

including. but not limited to: potable water. sewer, drainage

and solid waste.

GOAL: PROVIDE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING

PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS AND FOR THE

REDEVELOPMENT OF THOSE AREAS OF THE CITY IN NEED

OF SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE REINVESTMENT.

OBJECTIVE 6: Upgrade and improve building codes and inspection

procedures.

PUBLIC UTILITIES ELEMENT

(Excerpts Only - Objective 1 to Policy 3-4)

valorem taxes. This means that the City has to regularly evaluate its fees and

rates to determine if increases are necessary to fund needed utility

improvements.


The Goals, Objectives and Policies which have been developed for

the Public Utilities Element are intended to support the overarching community

goal which emerged from South Daytona's Strategic Planning process. The

Public Utilities Element Goals, Objectives and Policies are subordinate to the

overarching goal; yet, in combination with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of

the other Plan Elements, contribute to the achievement of the community goal.

GOAL: SOUTH DAYTONA WILL PROVIDE PUBLIC SERVICES (INCLUDING

SANITARY SEWER, POTABLE WATER, STORMWATER DRAINAGE, SOLID

WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECLAIMED WATER.) TO MEET CURRENT AND

ANTICIPATED NEEDS AND WILL PROTECT THE NATURAL

GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS.

OBJECTIVE 1: South Daytona shall ensure that adequate public services

and facilities are available to meet the needs of residents

and businesses.

POLICY 1-6: The City shall operate its trash collection service either on a

competitive contract basis or as a City·operated service.

POLICY 1-7: The City shall continue its inspection programs and support

Volusia County efforts at identifying, inspecting and

managing hazardous waste generators.

POLICY 1-8: The City shall actively coordinate its master stormwater

planning efforts with those of Volusia County.

POLICY 1·9: The Citv shall continye to expand and make available

reclaimed water along the Ridgewood Avenue corridor and

Citv Parks as funding is made available.

OBJECTIVE 2: South Daytona shall schedule Improvements designed

to correct system deficiencies within five (5) years from

the identification of such deficiencies.

POLICY 2-1: The City shall continue to periodically survey - at intervals

no longer than every five years - the infiltration/inflow

conditions of the sanitary sewer system and construct

corrective improvements based upon the survey results.

POLICY 2-2: Shortly before completion of the Country Club Gardens

Sanitary Sewer Collection System Project in 1998·99, The

City shall establish a future schedule, budget, and funding

sources for extending sanitary sewer collection lines into the

remaining unsewered areas of the City.

POLICY 2-3: By 1998, the City shall complete the South Loop Water Main

project.

POLICY 2-4: As financially feasible, the City shall schedule in its Capital

Budget the remaining projects recommended in the City's

Master Stormwater Drainage Plan.

OBJECTIVE 3: South Daytona shall provide for a coordinated program

of service extensions for public systems within the City.

POLICY 3·1: The City shall coordinate any expansions of the water, sewer

service areas and reclaimed water service areas with the

City of Daytona Beach, as per the latest Interlocal Service

,Agreement.

POLICY 3-2: In all development requiring extension of the water and

sewer distribution and collection systems, the developer

shall be required to provide for the construction of all lines

and associated system improvements.

POLICY 3-3: The City shall continue to implement its recycling program

which provides for the collection and recycling of

newspapers, aluminum cans, glass and plastic.

POLICY 3-4: The City shall continue to enforce its requirements for the

disposal of oil, tires, batteries, white goods and hazardous

waste consistent with Volusia County landfill regulations.

POLICY3-5: The City shall install a reuse water distribution system that

obtains reuse water from either Daytona Beach or Port

CONSERVATION ELEMENT

(Excerpts Only - Objective 1 to Policy 3-1)


The Goals, Objectives and Policies contained in the Conservation Element

are intended to support the overarching community goal which emerged form

South Daytona's strategic planning and visioning process. The Goals,

Objectives and Policies of this Element are subordinate to the community goal,

yet, in combination with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the other Plan

Elements, contribute to the achievement of the community goal. The Open

Space and Recreation Element, Stormwater Drainage Sub-Element, the Coastal

Zone Element, and the Traffic Circulation Element have special links to· the

Conservation Element.

GOAL: CONSERVE AND PROTECT SOUTH DAYTONA'S NATURAL

RESOURCES IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND IN A MANNER

WHICH CONTRIBUTES TO THE CREATION OF A QUALITY,

WELL-ROUNDED COMMUNITY.

OBJECTIVE 1. Create a regulatory framework which integrates South

Daytona's natural resources into an urban environment.

POLICY 1-1: Implement the City's Streetscape Program schedule for

landscape planting on key streets.

POLICY 1-2: Periodically review the City's Tree Ordinance to ensure that

it meets or exceeds the Volusia County minimum

environmental performance standards mandated for all

governments in the county.

POLICY 1-3: Continue to implement development regulations which

require additional open space and landscaping for

commercial and industrial development.

POLICY 1-4:Continue to implement development regulations which

provide planned unit development and planned commercial

development options for residential and commercial

development as a means of providing additional flexibility in

dealing with site limitations and conservation needs.

POLICY 1·5: Continue to support the conservation of vital resource areas

in Volusia County through support of Volusia County's

Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition program,

adoption of resolutions of support for conservation activities,

and other actions which the City Council deems appropriate.

POLICY 1-6: Preserve the City's scenic assets through the purchase of

riverfront land as recommended in the Recreation and Open

Space Element and through the continued development of

the City's lakes as public recreation and scenic assets.

OBJECTIVE 2: Maintain and improve the quality of the Halifax River.

POLICY 2-1: Join with other communities along the Halifax River in the

development and implementation of a comprehensive water

quality management program.

POLICY 2-2: Continue to implement the City's storm water management

master plan which includes recommendations to improve the

quality of stormwater discharge.

POLICY 2-3: Continue the City's present policy of requiring onsite

retention and detention as a means of limiting the flow of

non·point source pollutants into area water bodies and

facilitating groundwater and aquifer recharge.

POLICY 2-4: The City shall meet the permit requirements of the NPDES

Program for its MS4 classification.

POLICY 2·5: The City shall develop a Reclaimed Water System Master

Plan for the expansion of the first phase of the City's reuse

water utility system to utilize the City of Daytona Beach's

reclaimed. water in an effort to reduce groundwater

withdrawals for irrigation and to reduce effluent discharges to

improve water quality in the Halifax River.

OBJECTIVE 3: Establish methods to conserve the city's water and air

resources.

POLICY 3-1: Continue to keep current and enforce development

regulations with minimum performance standards for

construction in flood prone areas.

POLICY 3-2: Continue to enforce the City's standard procedures for

limiting water use in times of water shortage as declared by

Documents

City of South Daytona · WHEREAS, the City of South Daytona, Florida has the authority to amend its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS,