Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STUARTON RESOURCES LIMITED REPORT OF ASSESSMENT WORK
CLAIM #1076664 Mcilraith Township. Patricia Mining Division
This report has been prepared in accordance with Sect.11. of the Mining Act. Revised Statutes of Ontario. 1990. Chapter M.14. pp. 119 and 120.
Both geophysical and geochemical survey work was carried out by Stuarton Resources Limited (SRL) as part of an integrated program to relocate undrilled targets in an area which has been extensively explored by several major mining companies during the 1970's.
************
CONCLUSIONS SL RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. An undrilled mag-EM anomaly, which is favorably located with respect to an intermediate-basic volcanic rock contact, has been re-located.
2. It is recommended that this EM-anomaly be tested further by the MMI survey method.
3. A previously unknown mag-VLF anomaly has been detected north of the EM-anomaly. This VLF anomaly has been tested by one line of MMI soil geochemistry samples. Increased concentration of copper and zinc was found to coincide with the VLF-axis.
4. If increased concentrations of economically interesting metals are found to coincide with the re-located EM-anomaly, it is recommended that the anomaly be tested by trenching and/or drilling.
Lionel C. KilburnPresidentStuarton Resources LimitedMay 9, 1997
52K02SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH 010
STUARTON RESOURCES LIMITED REPORT OF ASSESSMENT WORK - Claim #1076664
Patricia Mining Division Ontario Regulation 116/91
INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared in accordance with Sect.11. of the o Mining Act. Revised Statutes of Ontario. 1990. Chapter M.14. pp. 119 g and 120. Each section of this report follows in sequence those requirements set forth in Section 11, of the Mining Act
Both geophysical and geochemical survey work was carried out by Stuarton Resources Limited (SRL) as part of an integrated program to relocate undrilled targets in an area which has been extensively explored by several major mining companies during the 1970's.
Geophysical work consisted of magnetometer (mag) and Very Low Frequency (VLF) electromagnetic surveys. One previously unknown VLF anomaly has been discovered and tested using Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) geochemistry over glacial outwash overburden.
A brief description of the MMI method is set forth in the attached two page review, which appeared in the May 1996 issue, No. 52, pp.14 S 15, of The Gangue, which is the publication of the Mineral Deposits Division of the Geological Association of Canada.
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
Introduction 1Table of Contents 1List of Illustrations 2Location 3Claim Holder 3Access 3Key Map 3Author of this report 3Field supervisors 3Dates work performed 4Survey specifications 5Statement of financial expenditures 7Conclusions and recommendations 8
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Page
Maps Bound in Text
Map-1 - access roads 9 Key Map - relative positions of survey grids A claim 10 Mobile Metal Ions, a New Mineral Exploration Tool (technical
description of method) 11 Mobile Metal Ion Survey - Sample Collection Method 12 Profile of Metal Content - Mobile Metal Ion (ppb)
Anomaly 30-7A 13 XRAL Laboratories Certificate, July 8, 1996 (2 sides) 14 XRAL Laboratories Certificate, July 22, 1996 (2 sides) 15
Maps at back of report in pockets
Geophysical Maps November 1995 Grid (scale- 1:4.800^:Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Postings Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Profiles Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Contours
Geophysical Maps April Grid (scale- 1:2.500):Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Postings Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Profiles Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Contours VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase
and Quadrature Postings VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase
and Quadrature Profiles VLF-Electromagnetic - Fraser Filtered In-phase Data
Geophysical Maps April 8c June Grids combined (scale- 1:2.500):Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Postings Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Profiles Magnetometer Survey - Total Field Contours VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase
and Quadrature Postings VLF-Electromagnetic - Total In-phase
and Quadrature Profiles VLF-Electromagnetic - Fraser Filtered
In-phase Data
Geochemical Map April Grid (Scale- 1:2.500) Location and Copper, Zinc Lead 8t Cadmium Contents (ppb) of MMI samples
plotted on map titled "Fraser Filtered In-phase Data"
Claim Map #2882, Mcilraith Township, District of Patricia
2
LOCATION: a ll of these surveys are located within Claim #1076664; Mcilraith Twp., Ontario; 500 00' North latitude and 920 30' West longitude; and may be found on Claim Map #G2882.
CLAIM HOLDER: Stuarton Resources Limited (Client #301184), 178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville, Ontario, L6K 2H6
ACCESS: The area is easily accessible by road from either Dryden or Sioux Lookout. An all weather road leads from Dryden past Dryden Airport, along the southeast side of Gullwing Lake, thence northwards between Gullwing and Tot Lakes, and then eastwards to Hudson, Ontario. Hudson is connected by paved road to Sioux Lookout.
An all weather road branches westwards from this through-road and passes through the Claim #1076664 (see Map-1, access roads).
KEY MAP: Position of Claim #1076664 is shown with respect to identifiable topographic features and township boundaries or established survey lines, stations or markers on the Key Map and the accompanying claim map #G2882.
AUTHOR OF THIS REPORT: Lionel C. Kilburn, P.Eng, BSc, MSc, PhD
FIELD SUPERVISORS: These surveys were carried out under the supervision of the author of this report. Field work for geophysical surveys was carried out by Dusan Dmitrovic, 2592 Hammond Road, Mississauga, Ontario, K5K 1T2 (ph: 905-823-3195), and for the geochemical survey by Lionel C. Kilburn, 178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville, Ontario, L6K 2H6 (ph: 905-845-3650)
DATES WORK PERFORMED:
1. November 1995 - reconnaissance magnetometer survey to locate the approximate position of a magnetic anomaly detected by Selco in 1978. Cost of this survey consisted of travelling expenses from Toronto, accomodation and food at Sioux Lookout, use of a magnetometer for two days, and two days wages.
2. April 1996 - magnetometer and Very Low Frequency (VLF) electromagnetic survey of a grid over the Selco magnetic target which was located the previous November. Cost of this survey consisted of travelling and living expenses of the field operator, use of the mag-VLF equipment for two days, and drafting and compilation of the results. Unfortunately the field operator did not carry out the survey in the correct location and it had to be done again in June.
3. June 1996 - magnetometer and VLF electromagnetic survey of a grid over the Selco magnetic target which had been located the previous November. Cost of this survey consisted of travelling and living expenses of the field operator, use of the mag-VLF equipment for two days, and drafting and compilation of the results. This time, L. C. Kilburn accompanied the field operator to make sure that the survey was properly located.
During the second geophysical survey in June. Kilburn carried out collection of samples for a geochemical survey using the Mobile Metal Ion technique (MMI). Analyses of these samples were carried out by XRAL at no charge, as a test of the method and to encourage use of the technique.
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS: ( all grids are marked by flagging)
Geophysics November 1995 GridGrid size- 242 meters (800') X 394 meters (1,300')
line spacing = 1 51 S 91 meters (500' a 300')Length base line = 242 metersTotal length surveyed lines = 1,424 meters (4,700')Spacing of readings = 30 meters (100')
Note: grid is marked on the ground and recorded in British system of measure, and converted to metric for this report.
Survey equipment - UNIMAG total field magnetometer as follows:
(i) total field magnetometer (sensitivity 10y) (ii) base value - 58,000y
Geophysics April 1996 GridGrid size- 550 meters X 350 meters
line spacing = 50 metersLength base line = 550 metersTotal length survey lines = 350 metersSpacing of readings = 25 meters
Survey equipment - EDM OMNI PLUS combined magnetometer and VLF detector as follows:
(i) total field magnetometer (sensitivity= 1y)(ii) base value - 59,OOOnT(iii) electonic correction for magnetic diurnal variation
made automatically at intervals of one minute and recorded within the instrument, which provides digital read-out directly to a computer-plotter.
(iv) VLF transmitter - NLK (24.8KHz)(v) In-phase and quadrature both read facing north
Geophysics June 1996 Grid Grid size- 600 meters X 600 meters
line spacing = 100 meters Length base line = 600 meters Total length survey lines = 3,475 meters Spacing of readings: 1,200 meters of line read at 25
meter spacing and 2,275 meters of line read at 12.5 meter spacing
Survey equipment - EDM OMNI P LUS combined magnetometer and VLF detector as follows:
(i) total field magnetometer (sensitivity- 1y)(ii) base value - 59,OOOnT(iii) electonic correction for magnetic diurnal variation
made automatically at intervals of one minute and recorded within the instrument, which provides digital read-out directly to a computer-plotter.
(iv) VLF transmitter - NAA (24.0KHz)(v) In-phase and quadrature both read facing north
Three sets of maps have been drawn for each geophysical survey asfollows:
1. Diurnally corrected magnetic postings2. Profiles of magnetic readings3. Contoured magnetic readings4. VLF field postings for in-phase and quadrature5. Profiles of in-phase and quadrature readings6. Contoured Fraser-filtered VLF readings (VLF-FF)
Three sets of maps are presented here. One set shows the April Grid, another shows both the April and June Grids combined on one sheet, and a third shows the 1995 reconnaissance magnetometer survey.
Geochemistry June 1996 Grid
Five soil samples were collected on line 4+OOW of the June 1996 grid. Three samples were collected at about 20 meter spacing directly over the axis of the VLF anomaly. Two background samples were collected 40 meters farther north and 60 meters farther south, as shown on the accompanying VLF-FF contour map.
April Grid coordinates and analytical results for these sampes are as follows:
From B. L. (meters)
1+OON0+60N0+37N0+15N0+75S
Copper (ppb)
39124718433
Zinc (PPb)^321011 1 c5
Cadmium (PPb)
JO-c10 c10 c10
13
Lead (PPb)^0^0^0^0^0
Profile of the MMI results (ppb metal) are shown on a separate diagram (p. 13) for survey line 4+OOW (see "Mobile Metal Ion (ppb) Anomaly 30-7AT Copies of the MMI analyses Certificates from XRAL Laboratories are included here on pages 14 8*. 1 5.
MMI sample collection method is particularly important because of the very low levels of metal concentration which are being sought. An outline of the method recommended by Linda Bloom of XRAL is included here on page 12.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL EXPENDITURES:
1. Reconnaissance magnetometer survey (November 1995)Travel expenses to/from Toronto
X living expenses (@ 2007o direct cost) - S 86 Magnetometer rental (2 days @ S65) - S 130 Wages (2 days @ S150) - S 300Subtotal - S 516
2. Mag-VLF survey (April 1996)Field operator charges - S1,023 Mag-VLF equipment (3 days @ S100) - S 300 Map preparation by computer - S 370 Report preparation (1.5 days @ S300) - S 450
Subtotal - S2.143
3. Mag-VLF survey (June 1996)Field operator charges - S 712Mag-VLF equipment (3 days @ S100) - S 300Map preparation by computer - S 350Report preparation (1.5 days @ S300) - S 450Subtotal - S 1,812
4. Collection of MMI samples and supervision of geophysical survey (June 1996)
Travel expenses to/from Toronto8i l iving expenses at Sioux Lookout - S 797
Wages (2 days @ S150) - S 300 Analyses of MMI samples (5 x S19) S 95 Report preparation (0.5 days @ S300) - S 150Subtotal - S1.342
Grand total - S5.813
CONCLUSIONS SL RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. An undrilled mag-EM anomaly, which is favorably located with respect to an intermediate-basic volcanic rock contact, has been re-located.
2. It is recommended that this EM-anomaly be tested further by the MMI survey method.
3. A previously unknown mag-VLF anomaly has been detected north of the EM-anomaly. This VLF anomaly has been tested by one line of MMI soil geochemistry samples. Increased concentration of copper and zinc was found to coincide with the VLF-axis.
4. If increased concentrations of economically interesting metals are found to coincide with the re-located EM-anomaly, it is recommended that the anomaly be tested by trenching and/or drilling.
Submitted by
Lionel C. Kilburn, P.Eng., BSc, MSc, PhD May 9, 1997
8
ROAD ACCESS SYSTEMScale - 1'^ 4 miles
claims 1076664 Z 4016665
v j sf~r-ff^yttdit WT -' ? ixi-'"-! -J— —— ——l ^- //,1it.\J- ' /-~^," a /^.. ^--^ , To, L
Claim #1076664
CLAIM #1076664. Patricia Mining Division Claim map G-2882 (Mcilraith Twp.)
Relative positions of Selco 1978 and SRL 1995 a 1996 grids with respect to Claim #1076664
Scale 1" ^ 1 /4 mile
Position of secondary roads shown
Selco grid 1978
SRL grid April 1996
SRL grid November 1995
SRL grid June 1996
10,
Mobile Metal IonsA New Mineral Exploration Tool
hy AW. lUdnn, K.D. liim-ll, l .M. (.dy, A. 1.M. mn, M l \Tilrixti K . K. CJ.irdncr
( ,i'ix honmfry KcMMrrh (.'c/ilrc, W .Au-ilr.i/M.i/x/ VVtimlcc/i Ply., //d, W ,Aus(r,i)(,i
Partial extractions have a long history in geochemistry. Their use probably reached an hiatus in the 1970s when the transition to full sample digestion with rapid turn-around through large laboratories became the stand ard method for exploration analysis. At that time, detection limits stood at the low ppm level for most elements. Since then, the lower detection limits for most elements, particu larly those of economic interest, have de creased by three orders of magnitude, to the ppb level. This almost imperceptible 'revolu tion by stealth', while readily welcomed by most exploraiionists, has not been fully ex ploited. In addition to being able to carry out 'routine' geochemistry at lower levels, the new instrumentation has opened up new ave nues in the methods of selecting sample ma terial for analysis which will maximize the opportunity for detection of ore bodies. Partial extraction is one technique which has, and will continue to benefit from this revolution.
The aim of a partial digestion is to release some of the metal contained in a soil lo solu tion. Mobile metal ions arc those which arc released to solution from the use of very weak exlractanls - extraclants which deliberately do noi attack the substrate or matrix. A large per centage of mobile metal ions appears lo be derived from metal-containing ore-bodies,
of nitrogen atoms in diamond; . Processings, Royal Society of Loncfcrt, A v38l,p. 159-178.
Gnflin, W.L, Cousens, D.R.. Ryan, C.G., Sie, S.H. and Suicr, GF., ( 1989): Ni in chron* pyrope; a new geothermometer, Contributions lo Mineralogy and Petrology. V. 103, p 199-202.
Jacques, A.L, l liiggerty, S. E, Lucas, H. and Boxer, G. L, (19K9): Mineralogy and penology of the Argyle (AKI) lamproite pipe. Western Australia. inJ-L.Ross (cd ) Kimberlites and related rocks, volume l . fourth Inlemam'l Kimberiile Conf.. fain, 1986, p. 1531&9.
ftakins, D. And Newton, R.C. (1980): The compositions of coexisting pyroxenes and garnet in the system Ca"-MgO-A12O3-Si2O at 900-UlxrC and high pressure. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrolugy, v75,p291-300.
Schulze,DJ.(1994): abundance and distribution oflow-Ca garnet harzburgite* in the subcralonic lithosphere of southern Africa; in, Kimberliles, Related Rocks and Mamie Xenolith*, p 327-335.
Sobolev, N.V., (1977): Deep sealed inclusions in knnber- liies and the problem of the composition of the upper mantle; American Geophysical Union, 279 p.
Taylor, W R., Jaques, AL. and Kidd, M., (1990): Nitrogen- defeci aggregation characteristics of some Australian diamonds. Tune-temperature constraints on the source regions of pipe and alluvial diamonds; Ameri can Minfrulttgin v 75, p. 12SO-I3 10.
Woods, n S , ( l Wo): Plalelets and the inlrored absorption ot type la diamonds; Proceedings of the Ruyul Society ofUmJon, A v 407, p. 219-238.
Table 1 . Summary of Cose Histories Investigated by the MMI ProcessStyle
Base Metals Pb,
in, Cu (
AfrPdJ
Ni ( Cu, Pt, Pd)
Au (2 Ajp
Sub-economic
Cases
24
9
37
4
Range of Settings
VMS, Miss Valley, massive and
disseminated. Very high to low rainfall. Slum- ritt'ply buried.
Massive to disseminated komatiite Ni in uluamafid. All arid zone, some in
partly transported material.
Mainly Archean qi vein style, some
porphyry. Most in and iones, but
several in high rainfall areas. Must on
deeply weatlu-ied pruhlei, some v*i[h
extensive blu-erw.tjh ^i dune cover
Various setting fi. depths
MMI Oeoi hemislry
Very sharp ore element anomalies
directly above and/or up-dip.
3 failures
Two levels, one distinguishes U/m units, the other Ni within U/m unity
2 failures on disseminated NiMany with i 30 times background anomalies, sharper than conventional geo*.riemiii.ry - slvaip enough Lo provide direa drilling Uriels ( Wr* huk^ wuh -- l^/l A^ j[ tjiii level]S failures on lraiix)rted overburdenNo failures, i.e., no false anomalies
and caretul use of weak extractants and very low level chemical pre-concentration and analysis techniques can be used to obtain sig nificant and reliable element signals to enable the anomaly patterns to be enhanced, re solved, and interpreted for the detection of blind ore-bodies. While the exact mechanisms for release, transport, and 'fixation' of the metals arc, in our case, the subject ot spon sored research and confidential, the technique is ul considerable importance lo the cxplora lion industry, because of its apparent ability to operate in deeply-weathered terrain, and in some cases through considerable thicknesses of overburden. Some 7000 samples, involving over 50 000 analyses have now been subjected to the Mobile Metal Ion Process.
The Mobile Metal Ion P rocess (MMIj-.f
The following are the major steps in the process:
* evaluation of background inlormation, in eluding existing geochemical data.
* field inspection, program design and sam pling;
* digestion and extraction of meuls;* analysis and QC (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, Au,
Ag.Pt&PdXand,* interpretation, recommendations and re
port.A number of separate digestions is re
quired, because no unc digcslaiil is capable ol providing optimum extraction o! all nine mcl- als. Dtgcslanls, details ol winch mini remain proprietary, have been screened and selected for their ability to extract only the very weakly-attached (mobile) meuls. Extraciants used are mulli-componet mixtures of water soluble organic and inorganic chemicals. Fol lowing digestion and analysis, 'background' for each element is calculated to provide a 'Response Ratio' ut each sample point lor each element. All subsequent interpretation of dala is based upon application ol the appropri ate thresholds lo the Res|)onse Kalios.
MMI Response Ratios Over d Base Metals Deposit at 700 m Depth
JO
s,(ftc oD.i/iOJtt
200
150
100
50
r™ "f l — t— -t — i — f ~~ F—900W 650W
^U^^jljjji i-^
~n H Zn/250
i®!iliff
IMi
D cdEl PbLul Cu
p: 1 Location ofHB mineralization at\~\4- 700 m depth
— ™] rw
''''^'' TVTf
, ^j --T--"I~l........i---j -f — l - - r- -, -j..... ,,
500W 375W 150W metre*
MVPPWl" i" in ,ii.i,.WTO^pw^7;,e Gangue' No. 52'"
/l
Table 2. Ni Responses over Mineralized and Ferruginized Barren UltramaficSampleNP11
(975t iimiN)
NP15ffl75t ^ nniNi
SoilPale Red/Brownsandy dayStrongly ferrug.
red/brown soil
with ironstone
Over8.6 m @2.75"/., Ni
Barren Ultramafic
MMI Response3B600 ppb
75 x background
3000 ppb
b x background
Total Ni720 ppm
6 x background
BOO ppm
7 x background
Oso Hislory Results
Over 70 case history and working studies have been earned out using the MMI process in tour comments. Table l gives an indication of the range of situations covered, and the relative success achieved.
Two of these examples are examined here in detail. Figure l shows the MMI anom aly on a transect across strike of buried base metals mineralization.
In the above example, note that the zone of mineralization at a depth of 700 m, projects to surface at very closely the position of the very sharp, mulii-element MMI anomaly (the Response Ratio for Zn has been divided by 250 lo appear on the same scale).
The second example, is from Nepean nickel deposit nearCoolgardie, Western Aus tralia. The ore zone contains massive nickel sulphide, with sulphides of copper, lead, co balt and minor gold, platinum and palladium mineraliztion Several factors are of interest m this particular study. First, the nodular fer ruginous material lo the west of the mineral ized zone, which shows high nickel responses by conventional analytical procedures, does not have a high MMI response. This is shown in Table 2 .
This lahle highlights that two different MMI thresholds are appropriate in the case of nickel, one which distinguishes ultramafic rocks from rocks with lower Ni contents (e.g., mafics), and the second to distinguish poten- uall-mineralized areas within ultramafic se quences, from 'barren' ultramafic. The MMI response over Ni mineralization is, in this case, 75 times background, while the MMI response over barren ultramafic is 6-times background. The data in Table 2 also show that in this case conventional geochemistry fails to provide a distinction between the Ni content of the ferruginized soil over barren ultramafic, and the Ni content in soil over mineralization, whereas the MMI partial ex traction clearly does.
At Nepean, the MMI response for Ni is at a maximum over the ore zones, and deline ates several ore zones with remarkable accu racy. As noted in the case of other base metals, there is the coincidence of several anomalies from individual elements contained in the mineralizalion, principally Pd and Cu. In many cases, there is an associated, but later ally-displaced, weak Au-Ag anomaly over the basal contact of the ultramafic unit with mafic units in the sequence. Several other pre viously-undetected, prospective zones are in dicated by MMI Ni Response Ratios to the east of the mined zone, and to the east of a postulated fold axis (Kirkpatrick, 1985). They
may represent anomalies which are associated with a possible structural repeal of minerali zation.
Discussion
1) Summary of essential features of MMI anomalies:
* MMI anomalies exist, andean be used to detect buried mineralization;
* MMI anomalies are clearly different to conventional geochemical anomalies in their appearance, intensity and potential application to exploration;
* The mechanism of formation of MMI anomalies is almost certainly very differ ent from that responsible for the forma lion of normal m u 11 i -e le m e ut geochemical anomalies;
* Not all elements behave in exactly the same manner; and
* MMI anomalies are sometimes 'swamped' in areas of recent, rapid transport.
Some of the individual and relevant ob servations which lead us lo these conclusions are;
* MMI anomalies comprise only elements present in the mineralization in signifi cant amounts;
* Anomalies are sharp, and in most cases directly overlay and define the extent of the surface projection of buried primary mineralized zones;
* When primary mineralization is high grade, MMI anomalies are capable of penetrating significant thicknesses of overburden; and,
* The incidence ol false anomalies is very low compared to normal geochemical methods.
2) Relationship of MMI lo other par tial extraction geochemical methods:
One of the first reports of the 'geogas' phenomenon was by Malmquvist i Kristiaiis- son (19X4). In this report the primary gases detected were nitrogen, argon, oxygen, and methane over a massive sulphide deposit in Central Sweden. Subsequent variations of the technique utilized plastic collection strips and very sophisticated instrumentation to detect ultra-trace levels of metal ions on the collec tors. Compared to other techniques, sample collection is not as robust, and the technique is very expensive when applied on the scale required for exploration.
The CHIM, Ml'l- and TMGM methods developed in the USSR (Antropove ci al., 1992) during the I9SOs recently came under increasing scrutiny. The USGS recently pu bished their findings on this technique (Smith
et al., 1993). The CHIM method (clearly very similar to the MMI technique, even to the use of carbon electrodes for pre-conceniration) and Gas Vapour Phase method (Magellan, 1993) are other methods of accessing metal ions from soils which differ from traditional partial extraction techniques. The traditional methods have, m many cases, used special extractanls to perform selective extraction-re lease of nietals from specific substrates These inelhods need lo ensure thai the cxtraclant does not dissolve an exessive amount of the substrate and release metal which contributes lo 'background noise'.
3) Possible mechanisms of formation of MMI anomalies
The Geochemical Research Centre (GRC) at Technology Park, Bentley, W. Aus tralia, operates a research program with the aim of providing participants with informa tion on the mechanism of formation of mobile metal ion anomalies. The Centre is currently considering mechanisms involving vapour (aerosol) transport and chemical release of metals during weathering. The elucidation of the mechanism isnol just concerned withthe mode ol transport, but also wiih me form o! tixation ol ihe metals in the soil regime. For ihib, the Centre is utilizing study areas pro vided by participating companies to examine tlie effects of different regolith, mineralogical, climatic and geomorphological situations on the presence, strength and persistence of anomalies.
Conclusions
Due lo tile increasing need for explora tion techniques lo operate effectively in areas ol deeply weathered or transported overbur den, this new geochemical technique has the potential to complement geophysical methods for the detection o! blind mineralization. Be cause of the very sharp and coincident nature ol tlie anomaly peak, it has the potential to significantly reduce drilling costs. As such the exploration budget will be affected by the in- troduclion of the technique into the explora tion program, in some cases by reductions of up to 30 - 50'^. Any partial digestion process is dependent on the correct, systematic and careful execution of a number of steps, that these methods cannot be easily translated lo a rapid/routine analytical technique As such, partial exlraclions will remain relatively ex pensive compared lo routine analysis, and they must be implemented into exploration programs with due diligence and care. An other word of cuulion is also required; Lhcrc is often a tendency, alter the initial scepticism has abated, to regard any new geochemical technique as a universal panacea, and in some cases lo misapply it. The MMI technique will be no different. There is a practical limit to its usefulness, which is dependant upon future developments in analytical techniques and ex tractanls. However, if carefully applied in an integrated and systematic manner, it seems certain to make a large contribution to the detection of buried mineralization.
A( knowU'dnu'nls
The work described in this paper in cludes any carried out under the auspices of
May 1996 '
MOBILE METAL ION SURVEY - SAMPLE COLLECTION METHOD
Equipment-1. 40cm diameter plastic garden sieve with minus 5mm
apertures (available at hardware stores) to classify sample
2. steel (not painted) garden spade to collect sample3. plastic wash dish to catch sieved product4. kitchen floor brush to clean sieve 81 dish between samples
Sample specification-500 gram sample stored in 90cm X 150cm plastic snap seal
sample bag
Sample site-Should be undisturbed and preferably a few meters from any
major contamination or drilling lines. Windborne contamination can be avoided during sample collection by sampling just below the surface.
Sample collection-In undisturbed environments, samples are collected
approximately 50-100mm below surface. The surface soil layer is scraped away eliminating organic matter and debris, and soil sample material is collected and sieved.
If there is a potential contamination problem, samples should be collected at a depth so as to avoid any contaminated material and the sampler's judgement must be relied upon. Damp samples do not cause any indue complications as long as there is no serious cross-contamination from sample collection.
LCK/June 4, 1996
12.
Mobile Metal Ion (cob} Anomaly 30-7A
200 -
180 -
160 - —
140 4-
N 1 2 0 -
Sg 100 -m8: so ~
60 4-l
40 -
20 -
0 - ; l——— — — \ — — — i — K —O
2+OON ^
r^^"Z.0CO
0
1
Solid columns- ppb copper
Open columns- ppb zinc
i i H — i i_ i i i ' i4. ~z. wr- m inCO T— h^
oo o 2+OOSLine 4+OOW (2+OON to 2+OOS) in increments of 12.5 meters
XRALPAKE L li l
25-JUL-96 REPORT 7804 WORKORDKR 9136-
SAWLK CU PPB
ICP
ZM PPB
ICP
CD PPB
ICP
PB PPB
ICP
4N-0+37M/APR.GRID 4M-0+60N/APR.GRID 4W- 0+15M/APR. GRID 412W-17+OOS 412N-16+50S
412W-16+75S l L9W-13+75S
•^ L9W-14+OOS
D 411-0+3711/APR.aiID
47
12~—^
48
ae37
46B)
47
32
1120
48
•CIO
•CIO<20
^0 <20
22i20
D - QUALITY CONTROL DUPLICATE
t Ot tho SG5 l 4 . oaiiMi G6iifcr.ik; (l(; Scirvoillancc:)
XRAL XRAL LaboratoriesA Division of SGS Canada Inc.
1886 Leslie Street Don Mills, Ont Canada M3B 3J4 Telephone (416) 445-5755 Fax (416) 445-4152
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
REPORT 7804
TO: STOARTOMC/O L.C. KILBURN 178 SHAMLEY OAKVILLE, ONTARIO
CUSTOMER No.
DATE SUBMITTED 8-Jul-96
3083
WORKORDER 9136- TOTAL PAGES l
9 SOILS
CD PPB ZN PPB CD PPB PB PPB
METHOD DETECTIONLIMIT
ICP 5. ICP 5. ICP 10. ICP 20.
METHOD CODE
*** UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE WE WILL DISCARD PULPS IN 90 DA'.'S *' AND RBECTS IN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF- THIS REPORT
ATE 25-JUL-96 CERTIFIED
Mombur Of Iho SGS Group (Soc.it-k'i G6n6r;iU; (K) Survoillunu:)
XRAL 08-AUG-96 REPORT 8027
PAGE l of l
WORKORDER 9479-
SAMPLB
/L10W-16+OOS
'. L8W-15+60S\L12W-18*50S
y L4W-1+OOH
1 L4W-0+75S
f PL+9+OOS
\ PL+11+OOS"S PL+12+OOS
^PL+14+OOS (100' SOUTH
XGOODIB-600
J 25002800•*^
45005500
D LlOW-16-t-OOS
CU PPB MISC
MMI-A
69414139
33
124
98
O73
52
37
25475455
ZN PPB MISC
MMI-A
145
73999^^
258
1868
150
99
9
^488322142
CD PPB MISC
MMI-A
•ao52
•CIO•OO
13
•ao•ao•ao-aoC15 )•ao<10
22<10<10
PB PPBMISC
MMI-A
^0
^0
<20 v<20 *v
^0<20<20<20<20
^0<20<20<20<20
D - QUALITY CONTROL DUPLICATE
rMember of the SG! , x idi6 Generale de Surveillance)
l 5.
XRAL XRAL LaboratoriesA Division of SGS Canada Inc.
1885 Leslie Street Don Mills, Ont Canada MSB 3J4 Telephone (416) 445-5755 Fax (416) 445-4152
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REPORT 8027
TO: STUARTON RESOURCES LIMITED C/O L.C. KILBURN 178 SHANLEY OAKVILLE, ONTARIO L6K 2B6
CUSTOMER No.
DATE SUBMITTED 22-Jul-96
3083
WORKORDER 9479- TOTAL PAGES l
14 SOILS
CD PPB ZN PPB CD PPB PB PPB
METHOD
MISC MISC MISC MISC
DETECTION LIMIT
5. 5.
10. 20.
METHODCODE
MMI-A MMI-A MMI-A MMI-A
*** UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE WE WILL DISCARD PULPS IN 90 DAYS *** AND REJECTS IN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS REPORT
fATE 08-AUG-96 CERTIFIED BY '/y \ s '-i \l i t
Dr. Hugh de Sou/j. General Manager
Member of the SGS Group (Societe Generate de Surveillance)
900' to road along blazed line
.J
Stuarton Resources Limited Reconnaissance Magnetometer Survey Anomaly 30-7A - Claim #1076664 Mcilraith Twp.. Patricia DistrictTotal Field Contoured(contour interval-I.OOOy)
Scale - 1:4,800 (scale - 1'^ 400') Magnetic declination - O 0 Base line azimuth - 550 (2350) Grid established by pace and compass
and flagged with orange tape Survey dates: November 23-24, 1995
Instrument: UNIMAG Sensitivity: ±10yBase value = 58,000y must hft addfifl tQ—-
all postin jft E C E \ \
03 N - f/iO—i (O(D Q.o- - - n ey03 3g * - l/ioo. 5
-l /V-0
cJ/220 square blazed tree
u-v 9 1
/fieo-ST^^ 2000I//00
mo-IfBO- I2&- /Z9o±
s^ik muskeg swamp
.iD&o
•M/
900' to road along blazed line
Stuarton Resources Limited Reconnaissance Magnetometer Survey Anomaly 30-7A - Claim #1076664 Mcilraith Twp.. Patricia District
Total Field Postings
Scale - 1:4,800 (scale - 1^ 400') Magnetic declination - O 0 Base line azimuth - 550 (2350 ) Grid established by pace and compass
and flagged with orange tape Survey dates: November 23-24, 1995
Instrument: UNIMAG Sensitivity: ±10y Base value = 58,000y must
all postin
B^\
WJD
SCD*
CT0)N
^*-* (DCD
030) NCDQ.— .3"
CD3O^
o3
1--
/fiO
llfO
H it lo-~
-
----
1I~Q//501130/l?0J/oa/o?o
l&to
^ *"s #J__l l
v 0o1
3/90-1 J 280 i
square blazed tree1150
ZSSO/880-\l4-*0
i
19H7
MINING LANDS BRANCH
1380-1360
I7JO-
muskeg swamp
900' to road along blazed line
Stuarton Resources Limited Reconnaissance Magnetometer Survey Anomaly 30-7A - Claim #1076664 Mcilraith Twp.. Patricia District
Total Field Profiles
Scale - 1:4,800 (scale - 1^ 400') Magnetic declination - O0 Base line azimuth - 550 (2350) Grid established by pace and compUss
and flagged with orange tape Survey dates: .November 23-24, 1995
Instrument: UNIMAG Sensitivity: ±10yBase value = 58,000y must be added to
all postings
w OD lQ) ^ -l
O) *
CT — -O) N (D Q.
H 2.0•no H lo
11-50
/OfO
1256 '
E l /220- square blazed treen-so
ECEIVE
MAY 2 1 19P7
MINING LANDS BRANCH
muskeg swamp
O O
o-
o o
400W i
300W 200W i
100W 100E
From B.L. (meters)
4-OOW 300W 200W 100W 100E
o o
-O
8(A
LEGEND
Mobile Metal Ion Surve
-sample location
2. l 730 550
40
. 30
20
10
O
FRASER
E C E I V E D
MAY 2 l 1997
LANDS BRANCH
25
IN-PHASE
Scale 1:250025 50 75 100 125 ——-^^
(meters)
150 175
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
VLF-ELECTRO MAGNETIC
FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE DATABowdidqe May 1996
400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100Ei i i i i
/fr
'
--z.0.o
0-
8-r~
98
94
104
-11
22
•63
76
-299 —— — —
480
124
-115
85 .
76
78
135 i
92
106
^39
33
41
123
-f? —— ———
189
168
1 VIItAI
-151
156
64
10
155*
109
106
-181
59
15
52
88
150
' -441
-615
189
90
43
186 i
167
84
-80
38
•-10
•34
-43? —————
•110
90
RBbo
•382
210
59
22 J
127
113
85
-5
13
•53
56
-64 ——————
227
165
t"JC176
-94
56
29
-21
120 i
97
100
-47
34
37
49
-53 ——————
29
63
4 ae1OO
--95
52
79
30 .
175
109
95
-105
84
68
46
16
107
ne30
-7
30
24
-1
150
110
64
-61
50
40
44
•41 —— —— ——
31
-9
anOZ
-69
-2
-18
-29
148
118
60
-49
45
12
37
nn
35
44
-85
65
29
19
149 T
127
104
-76
55
34
-6
-26 ——————
26
32
58
•114
92
44
-2
153 i
133
114
-82
69
49
16
-8
-25
-44
-57
47
45
13
143 f *
131 rf
115
•92 -8-z.
74
57
61
•17 -0
-0
-13
-24
-15 -8(/J
10
-434
-308
1 1 1400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100E
/l f******************************
7 L EGEND
/ Instrument: EDA Omni Plus\ Operator: D. Dmitrovic
Posting: Total field in nTBase Value: 59,000 nT
Correction: Base station
--"~" s ^~'? ^ ^ ^^ * -*- * ^
R E C E rv/ E r
: MAY 2 l 1 997
Scale 1:2500 MINING LANDS ORANC25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
(meters)
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY.
TOTAL FIELD POSTINGSBowdidqe May 1996
400Wi
300W 200W i i
100W l
ol
100E
o-
8-
•8
LEGEND *******************************
Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovic
Profile: Total field in nTBase Value: 59,000 nT
Profile Scale: 1 cm s 200 nTPositive Direction: RightCorrection: Base station
^ O -; } *-'
-O
Scale 1:25
RECE
MAY 2 l
t
JOINING LAND? 2RANCK25
•800
25 50 75 100 125 150 1755555555 (meters)
l 400W 300W 200W 100W
i O 100E
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL FIELD PROFILESBowdidQe May 1996
400W
o. o
o-
too o
300W i
200W 100W i
100E
400W 300W 2QOW 100Wi
100E
-O
8
LEGEND *******************************Instrument: EDA Omni Plus
Operator: D . DmitrovicContours: Total field in nT
Contour Intervals: 10, 50, 250 nTCorrection: Base station
59150
59100
59O50
59000
58950
TOTAL IN
ECEriELD|T MAY 2 l ' 997
MINING LAND0 ^
25 OScale 1:2500
25 5O 75 100 125 150 P—______
(meters)
175
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL FIELD CONTOURSBowdidqe May 1996
400W 300W 200W 100W
O-o
00o o
100Ei
400Wi
300Wi
200W 100W 100E
LEGEND
Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovfc
Transmitter: NLK (24.8 KHz)Fitter Interval: 12.5 metres
Contour Intervals: 10, 50 units
8 2. l 73 c;c-50
-OECEIVED
AY 2 l 1997
MINING LANDS BRANCH
FRASER FILTER IN-PHASE
25Scale 1:2500
25 50 75 1QQ 125—
(meters)
150 175
t/)
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC
FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE DATABowdidge May 1996
.•3
o. o
o-
t/18-
400W i
300W i
200W 100W i
Ol
100E i
400Wi
300W
\1
200W
:I
i100W
lo 100E
•8
-o
-8on
LEGEND
Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovfc
Transmitter: NLK (24.8 KHz)In-phase: Solid Line
Quadrature: Dotted LineProfile Scale: 1 cm =
Positive Direction: LeftFacing Direction: North
R E C E l V E L
MAY 21 1997
MINING LANDS BRANCJ1
25Scale 1:2500
25 50 75 100 125m—OSSSZ(meters)
150 175
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC
IN-PHASE AND QUADRATURE PROFILESBowdidge May 1996
400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100E Ji i i i i X/ *******************************
7 L EGEND\ 7 *******************************
/ft/ Instrument: EDA Omni Plus22-
15-
6-
"Z.
0 - -1-O '
-16-
-4-
10-
0- 2-
-18
-21
-23
CO 8- -22-T—*
-20
-19-
-15 J
-15 24-,
-16 27-
-14 26-
-14 7-
-14 -11
-6 -2
0 29-
-3 ———— 36-
-5 9
•-5 -12-
0 -16
•3 -19-
6 -19 J
7 -18
8 -17-
-13 23 1
-12 33-
-8 41
-18 30-
-20 12
-11 -3
-0 9
f -rrr
-5 21
-10 2
-7 -9
-7 -15-
-2 -20
-2 -18
3 -14
-16 19
-13 18
-6 3!
-9 31-
-17 25
-16 16
-6 12
rt AC
1 42
-3 28
-8 14
-6 5-
-5 10
1 -2
4 -7
-15 16-
-16 19-
-11 25-
-9 34-
-12 23-
-13 19-
-12 20-
-S ———— 26-
5 31-
0 33
-4 22
-8 20-
-2 16
-1 9-
0 5
•-19 16-1
-17 17-
--13 17
-11 12-
-13 9
-10 6
-8 8
-6 ————— 8-
•-4 11-
-5 11
-B 10
-4 18-
•-1 17
•0 14
•4 9
-16 10
-15 11
-15 9
-13 9-
-1B 8
-14 6
-11 3
-9 ————— 2-
-7 1
-5 0
-5 7
-8 10-
-7 9
-5 10
-2 7
-16 9
-16 9
•-15 10
-13 5-
-12 2
-12 2
-9 1
•-5 -2
•-5 -4
-5 -2
-6 8-
-5 9
-0 7
0 7
-13 5-
-14 6-
-13 5-
-14 3-
•-13 2
-11 -2
-10 -4
-8 ————— 6-
-5 -6
-6 -4'
-5 . -3
-5 2-
-5 8
-4 4
-0 2
-14 5-
-13 5-
-13 4
-11 3-
-9 4
-8 2
-6 -2
-4 ————— \-
-2 -6 -
-1 -6
-2 -4
-4 1-
-1 6
0 4
3 1
-10 4i
-13 6-
-12 4
-13 2-
-10 2
-7 5
-7 1
-6 ————— 1-
-4 -3
-2 -5
-3 -7
-3 -6-
-1 -1
-1 0
3 -1
-13 4i
-13 6
-14 5
--13 5-
-10 6
-7 6
-7 8
V v
-4 4
-2 3
0 1
-1 -2-
1 -4
4 -3
•7 -2
,8 /V \ Operator: D. Dmitrovic / ^ Transmitter: NLK (24.8 KHz)
J I n-phase: Left of Line-9 rf Quadrature: Right of Line
Facing Direction: North*******************************
-13
-1Z
-11
"9 , ^ t
ft ,-- Vi ® ^"^ i 1 —Q ,.' ~ p -'. gt i"
-6 -0
-4
-4
*p
^R^cTrvTc"!M AY 2 11997 |
^N^GJ^NDS.BRA^ .
Scale 1:250025 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
-i - SCO
•-o
^a—nii^^aMiMMi^a (meters)
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
L 6 DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
VLF-ELECTROMAGNETICi i i400W 300W 200W 100W 0 100E .
IN-PHASE AND QUADRATURE POSTINGSBowdidqe May 1996
Ontario Ministry olNorthern Developmentand Mines
Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990
ransaction Number (office use)
Assessment Files Research Imaging
Personal info Mining Act, th Questions at 933 Ramsay
5(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the ssment work and correspond with the mining land holder, istry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor.
52K02SEOOO1 2.17305 MCILRAITH 900Instructions: - r-or work performed on Crown Lands before re
- Please type or print in ink.cording a clOi, use|orrrMR?4@i.
1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name Client Number
Address Telephone NumberDS -OLFax Number
Name Client Number
Address Telephone Number
Fax N-jmber
2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.
Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs) D Physical: drilling, stripping,
trenching and associated assays | | Rehabilitation
Work Type f Office Use
Commodity
Total S Value of Work Claimed
s f* * 5 C 1 J
Dates Work Performed
.. FromDay Month Day
*1
Month YearNTS Reference
Global Positioning System Data (if available) Townsiip/Area
M or G-Plan Number
Mining Division fo.*friVi
C-288Z Resident Geologist, District
Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;-- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212; l MAY 9 l- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked fcf assignrng work;1997- include two copies of your technical report.
3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name Telephone Number
Address Fax Number
Name Telephone Number
Address Fax Number
Name Telephone Number
Address Fax Number
4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent
V— ' - ^TV-I ^Q nereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(Print Name)
forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent
Agent's Address\G
Telephone Number, Fax Number
5. Work to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to the mining land where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link must accompany this form.
Mining Claim Number. O r ifwork was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.
Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.
Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.
Value of work applied to this claim.
Value of work assigned to other mining claims.
Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date.
l, la hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under(Print Full Name)
subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Authorized in Writing Date
6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.
Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( s ) i n the boxes below to show howyou wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:
D 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated. d 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):
Note: If you follov
JridH&ated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, number 2 if necessary.
Deemed Approved Date
(3Date Approved
Date Notification Sent
Total Value of Credit Approved
Approved for Recording byJRidTna^ecorder (Signature)
Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
Numbw (oflics UM)
Personal information collected on this lorm is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) at the Assessment Worfc Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the Information Is a public record. This information will be used to revieVrJbe asse^tmerf rwaxl^nd correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recc#d*r, Ministry of NqfthqrrvDe/veJopmem and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6B5. "~ 'J v—'f " ^,.
Work TypeUnits of Work
Depending on the type ol work, list the number ot hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres of grid line, number of samples, etc.
Cost Per Unit Total Cost
"X
f I5o
Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).
Transportation Costs
? Food and Lodging Costs
^r
Total Value of
Calculations of Filing Discounts:
QfW^r iflyWork filed within two years of performance is claimed at 100(M) of the a
l&fEmGitE'rJriV E
MAY 2 l 1997
.MiNifeiG.LAfNpsBPANCH . ,... .be'i'e ToTorvoFuo of Aooeooi tent Work.. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 5096 of the Total
Value of Assessment Work. H this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:
TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 - Total S value of worked claimed.
Note: JJ- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit. ~~'- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45^iys of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification Is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted. ~J- ' ' ~o
Certification verifying costs:
, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may(pleas* print full name)
reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on
the accompanying Declaration of Work form as
to make this certification.
WV Woufttlb Utj(recorded holder, tgenl, ot slale company poslon with signing authority)
am authorized
Signature Dale
CD
m i\Po.
l fs
^'- - - J
\
,cr.:
\OlWiyo *rPROJECTED LINE
Webb Twp.
TRIM LINE
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
July 22, 1997
Sharon Kemash Mining Recorder Queen and Fourth P.O. Box 3000 Sioux Lookout, ON P8T1C6
Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario
Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5
Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863
Dear Sir or Madam:
Subject: Transaction Number(s):
Submission Number: 2 .17305
StatusW9730.00196 Deemed Approval
We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.
If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.
Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.
NOTE: This correspondence may affect the status of your mining lands. Please contact the Mining Recorder to determine the available options and the status of your claims.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.
Yours sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section
Correspondence ID: 11090
Copy for: Assessment Library
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number: 2 .17305
Date Correspondence Sent: July 22,1997 AssessorLucille Jerome
Transaction NumberW9730.00196
First Claim Number1076664
Township(s) l Area(s)MCILRAITH
StatusDeemed Approval
Section:13 Geochemical GCHEM14 Geophysical MAG 14 Geophysical VLF
Approval Date
July 21, 1997
Correspondence to:Mining Recorder Sioux Lookout, ON
Resident Geologist Sioux Lookout, ON
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON
Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Lionel C. KilburnSTUARTON RESOURCES LTD.OAKVILLE, ON
Page: 1Correspondence ID: 11090
Form 12
Mining Act ,,, v . rt D o . 'j f i'in l l vi Pvl' 1-,
REPORT OF WORK CONDUCTED AFTER RECORDING CLAIMRecorded holder(s) Client No.Stuarton Resources Limited 301184 "ID lAddress Telephone No.178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville ON L6K 2H6 (905) ft45i-36'S{iC -iMining Division Township/area M or G Plan No.Patricia Mcilraith Twp. G2882Dates work performed From: N ovember 1995 To: July 1996
Work performed (check one work group only) Work Group Type:
X Geotechnical survey Geophysical- Magnetometer A VLF-EMGeochemical- Mobile Metal Ion
Physical work,including drilling
Rehabilitation Other authorized work Assays Assignment from reserve
Total assessment work claimed on the attached statement of cost S 5,
Persons and survey company who performed the work:
RECEIVED
^ MAY 21 ISb/(give name X address of author of report)
MINING LANDS BRANCH Name AddressDusan Dimitrovic 2592 Hammond Road, Mississauga ON K5K 1T2 Lionel C. Kilburn 178 Shanley Terrace, Oakville ON L6K 2H6
Certification of beneficial interest:
l certify that at the time the work was performed the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder. Date: cv\ p \c ^ Recorded holder or agent (signature):
Certification of work report:
l certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this work report, having performed the work or witnessed it during and/or after its completion, and the annexed report is true.
Name and address of person certifying
Telephone No. DateWtMfJtvf Certified by: L ionel C. Kilburn (905) 845-3650 ' '| (signature)
Work report number for applying reserve: n ot applicable
Claim number: 1 076664 Number of claim units: 1 6 Total number of claims: 1
Value of assessment work done on this claim: S 5 , 8 1 3Total value of work done: S 5 , 8 1 3Value applied to this claim: S 5 , B 1 3Total value of work applied: S 5 , 8 1 3
Value assigned from this claim: n i lTotal assigned: n i lReserve: Work to be claimed at a future date: n i lTotal reserve: n i l
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark ( ) one of the following:
1. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.——2. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this work report. __3. Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix. ——
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option 1 will be implemented
If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following: l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.
N/A N/A
signed Date
O. Reg. 111/91. Form 12
TRIM LINE
-P'J 24/96 REG
REFERENCESAREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY
S.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
M.+ S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS
Description Order No. Date Disposition Filefff\ S .R.O. 163474
W 38/8? 28/5/82 S R. A M.R 194075
SAND AND GRAVEL
GRAVEL FI37297
MNR GRAVEL PIT N? 61 FILE 137297
GRAVEL V -'l FII8323
GRAVEL N 32 FI18323
M fl.R GRAVEL PIT IA-39
Route Lake Ar Whipper Lake Areai Taggart iC ^ T- l
FORMERLY SUN STRUM INTERMEDIATE
AERODROME
RETURNED TO PROVINCE
O. C. 24/8760
00
^CLB:h-
Q.13 O
CD^-
GO
-i-Q/6663 ysl
LCr\
C OE o
Webb Twp. t-w B b
LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.
OTHER ROADS TRAILS SURVEYED LINES:
TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC.LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC.
UNSURVEYED LINES.LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -t
UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM
FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT
i * i
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL
PATENT. SURFACE 81 MINING RIGHTS-_............^. 9.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY._____........._... O, MINING RIGHTS ONLY ___..___......._. O
LEASE, SURFACE i MINING RIGHTS—————.-— B" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY._...................... B" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY..._._.__........__. B
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .._....___ ................. TORDER IN COUNCIL ———._......^._———.——. OCRESERVATION ___......___.............,.........™.. ©
CANCELLED ___.......___——.....-,............... ®SAND 8. GRAVEL ___....___......,._——...—,,.. ©
NOTE: M INING RIGHTS I N PARCELS PATENTED P RIOR TO MAY 6. 1913. V ESTED IN O RIGINAL P ATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R.S.O 1970. CHAP. 380. SEC. 63. SUBSEC 1.
SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS
FEETO 10OO 2OOO 4OOO 6000 80OO
O 200 METRES
1OOO(1 KM)
2000(2 KM)
TOWNSHIP
MCILRAITHM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
DRYDENMINING DIVISION
PATRICIA LAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
KENORA
Ministryof LandNatural Management
Resources BranchOntario
MAY 1985 Number
THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER. MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES. FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON
2.1730
l
O
H
H
L. o
5
00 LO
TRIM LINE
52K02SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH 200
OJs ro8 g S
APRIL 1996 BASELINE
*******************************LEGEND
*******************************Instrument: EDA Omni Plus
Operator: D. DmitrovicTransmitter:
South Grid - NAA (24.0 KHz)North Grid - NLK (24.8 KHz)Filter Interval: 12.5 metres
Contour Intervals: 10, 50 units
FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE UNITS
JUNE 1996 BASELINE" l 73 r-
50Scale 1:2500
O 50 100 150
fmeters)
52K02SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH 210
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD,MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY***
FRASER FILTERED IN-PHASE DATABowdfdge August 1996
M
3S
IS}
8
JUNE 1996 BASEUNE '
50
*******************************
LEGEND*******************************
Instrument: EDA Omni Plus Operator: D. Dmltrovlc
Transmitter:South Grid - NAA (24.0 KHz) North Grid - NLK (24.8 KHz)
In-phase: Solid LineQuadrature: Dotted Line
Profile Scale: 1 cm = 2525Positive Direction: LeftFacing Direction: North
Scale 1:2500O 50 100
52KQ2SE0001 2.17305 MCILRAITH
150
220
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY***
IN-PHASE AND QUADRATURE PROFILESBowdtdge August 1996
i— i—i— r-(—i— r- r- (— p-
sg se sg sg sg 36 sg sg ' sg o m m
22i
15
6
-1-
-16
-4
10
f.
-18
-21
-23
-22-
-20
-19
-15
-15 24
-16 27
-14 26
-14 7-
-14 -11
-6 -2
0 29
-5 9
-5 -12
0 -16
-3 -19-
6 -19
7 -18
8 -17
-13 23
-12 33
-8 41
-18 30-
-20 12
-11 -3
-0 9
-5 21
-10 2
-7 -9
-7 -15-
-2 -20
-2 -18
3 -is- y-12
-10
-10
-11--11
-12-13
-15
-13
-20
-11-
JUNE 1996 BASELINE -7--0
811
8
2-2
-5
-6-
-7--9'
-9
-8-7-5
-5
r -16 19 -i
-13 18
-6 31
-9 31-
-17 25
-16 16
-6 12
1 42
-3 28
-8 14
-6 5-
-5 10
1 -2
4 -7
-15 16-
-16 19
-11 25
-9 34-
-12 23
-13 19
"12 20-
17
5 17
0 19
-416-
-811
-27
-1 3
0 1-
10 -3
11 -3
15 -5
•17 -6-19
18 -9
18 -13
19 -14
16 -17
15 -21
7 -15-\ —————————————— 9-
-5 -3
-9 -3-23 12
-23 16-21 17
-17 21
-13 16
—10 7-
-8 3
-5 0
-3 -2-1 -4
1 -50 -4
2 -4
2Q -3
in-4
31 '-5
33-4
22-2
2Q-0
162
9. 6
5 •7
-19 16
-17 17
-13 17
-11 12-
-13 9
-10 6
-8 8
-
-4 11
-5 11
-8 10
-4 18-
-1 17
0 14
4 9
-16 10
-15 11
-15 9
-16 9-
-16 8
-14 6
-11 ~21
-1
~7 .4
-5 .4
-51-
--86
6
•* 4
'~2 3-
11 2
•13 1
13 -1
•15 -8--11
18 -13
18 -15
17 -17-
15 -16
14 -167 .14 .? |C(~ lw
2 -6
0 -10
-6 5
-11 16-17 11
-22 6
-24 1
—20 1-
-15 1
-12 -0
-8 -3 -5 -5
-3 -5
-1 -60 -5
J -8
•t
-9
1 -7
0-6
7-5
10-4
9-3
10
7 •1
-16 9
-16 9
-15 10
-13 5-
-12 2
-12 2
-9 1
-5 -2
-5 -4
-5 -2
-6 8-
-5 9
-0 7
0 7
-13 5-
-14 6
-13 5
-14 3-
-13 2
-11 -2
" 10 "?1
^ -6
-5 -7
~6 -fi0
-5 ,-5-
-1
-5 ,o
~4 4
-0 2-
4 0
6 0
12 3
•14 0-
14 -316 -5
17 -717 -9
15 -14
11 -20
13 -15-6 ————————————— tt-
-3 -10
8 -10
1 -9
-4 -8-9 -5
-9 -5
-8 -3
-8 1-
-7 3-7 3
-7 1 -5 -2
-3 -5-2 -6
-1 -6
-4
JL
-4-6
-2-4
-2-3
-2
2-2
8-1
4
D2
-1
-14 5
-13 5
-13 4
-11 3-
-9 4
-8 2
-6 -2
-2 -6
-1 -6
-2 -4
-4 1-
-1 6
0 4
3 1
-10 4i
-13 6
-12 4
-13 2-
-10 2
-7 5
-7 1
-4 -3
-2 -5
-3 -7
-3 -6-
-1 -1
-1 0-
3 -T-7
4 -10-11-
6 -12-11-
8 -7-2
•9 1-
9 310 B
12 8
14 5
17 2
15 -2
9 -7-5 ———————————— t^-
1 -13
1 -15-3 -12
-4 -8 '-4 -2
-7 3
-9 9
—11 8-
-10 10-10 9
-10 4 -9 ^-O J
-7 1-7 0-5 -1
-13 4
-13 6
-14 5
-13 5-
-10 6-
-7 6
-7 8
-4 4
-2 3
0 1
-1 -2-
1 -4
4 -3
7 -2
-8
-9 f
\ 7
-13 /ft/yv *.
-li 7 ^y/
J
-11 ^^
^
-9
-6
-4
-4
-5
-1
-0i— f"
2 o ^ 0 mm
6 -7- -9 -5- -3
10 '
9 -9
9
10 -15
10
9 -18
7 -17
•3 -12-
2 03 10
3 125 13
6 129 9
12 514 'IT */
14 1
12 -1
7 -3
0 -6-6 -8
-10 -11
-12 -14
-15 -18-
-14 -24
-16 -24
-17 -18 -18 -5
-15 6
-13 10-12 6
-3- -2 -3-M -5-M -e1^ -4-L-11 4-
0r~ i— r- .r— r—
12 -5
13 -5
11 -77
-4 -9--0 -10-5 -7
-5 -4
-3 -2
-3 -10 -1
3 -26 A
t.
9 -2
•12 -1r 14 -1
15 -216 -3
18 -520 -8
-19 -11-
r 14- -14
•10 -17
2 -20 -4 -17
-13 -8•-16 6
-20 7
-18 7--17 16
oj NJ — o — -l 1 -15 18 o S 8 8 13* sg sg m 6 J
5
7
10
•10
9
8
6
5
44 #^
4-5
5
89
1214
15
16-17
17
16
13
15
5-7
-9-12
-13
-15 , -17 '-17
*******************************LEGEND
Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovic
Transmitter:South Grid - NAA (24.0 KHz)North Grid - NLK (24.8 KHz)
In-phase: Left of LineQuadrature: Right of Line
Facing Direction: North
Note: where north and southgrid lines adjoin, in— phase
postings for north grid havebeen moved up, and quadrature
povttngs fer soutk grid hum *- -^been moved down, to avoid
overlapping numbers. *******************************
-- : ,-s i -- - *" ' :
: '4' 3 ^ '
"-. . ! " -
--- - **~ ** . - -.,,
Scale 1:250050 0 50 100 150
(meters)
lllUlMiKlffillllllUNVilUllfflNNIIillllHfilllUiiUUiiliHffiUfillilllliHNllV111 li IHI 1 HI ill! 11 ID 111 li UN lil 11 11 111 HI (HI 1H III52K02SE0001 2. 17305 MCILRAITH 230
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY***N-PHASE AND QUADRATURE POSTINGS
Bowdidge August 1996
98
94
104
-11
22
63
76
-269 —————
480
124
132
-115
85
76
78
135
92
106
-39
33
•41
123
-W — — ——
189
168
150
-151
156
64
110 *1
42
43
69
152-
235312
402
531
7611031
1522
JUNE 1996 BASELINE 2150-2215
17661124
808573
443398 406-
430429-
411-
396
385378
378386-
155
•109
106
-181
59
15
52
-W — — ——
88
150
L -441
-615
189
-90
-43
186
167
84
-60
38
-10
34 160-
4 OT-*27 — rr-206
110 123
on 90 110
66 98-
• 3K 98
210 y
so 59 -290
22 -46-
27
14
23
113l
258
393555
8791693
3189_______________________ •ffi-'T
3474-
25601600
40680
156243 268-
279
266
244
227
237257
281304-
127
113
85
-5
13
53
56
-84 ——————
227
165
176
-94
56
29
-21
120
97
100
-47
34
37
49 48-
-W ——————47 T
29 13l -J
6397
186 211-
-* 35-
52 26
79 'S 9
^ -11-
-40-
-44
-50-
-33-45-
225
5201227
22003631 -
4480————————————————— -IOIQ
3165
32123644
22181210
472237-
119-
142
152
163
156
142146160-
184-
r175
109
95
-105
84
68
46
-51 — —— ——
16
107
96
-7
30
•24
-1
150 -]
110
64
-61
50
40
44 46.
^ ——— 30"•AJ
31 39*Jj
-936
82 56-
'm 75
-2 47
- 18 33JvJ
-29 39-
4
4
52
10-
413
61140
257564
1519————————————— W69-
1721
1253807
602
867
619
315 103-
218
251
245
238
256277
292310-
148
118
60
-49
45
12
57
-22 — — — —
35
44
74
-85
65
29
19
149
127
104
-76
55
34
-IS ——————
26
32
58
-114
92
44
2 -31-24-35
-23
35155
338
288
1 1D-
2771
107114
110
111
120—————————————— f62-
247
440
656
754
736
852
1151 1238-
1018
760
564
510
h 480417
1- 355307-
153
133
114
-82
69
49
.3 ———————
-8
-25
-44
-57
47
-45
13
143
13j /* *******************************
xX LEGEND\^ A / *******************************
115 /Y/ I nstrument: EDA Omni Plusrv x. Operator: D. Dmitrovic
. 92 f \ Posting: Total field in nT 7 Base Value: 59,000 nT
s/ D iurnal Correction: Base station74 /f *********i).*******K.*******i(t*i|.***
57
-17 APRIL 1996 BASELINE
-0
-13
-24
-15
10 r- f~
-434 S i0 m m
-308 -23,
-47
-27
196460 700-
872855
918849
561
334
247f*nf—————————————— 226-
229
243260
289332
379
433 527-
677
936
1394
2080
248021281476946-
667"~ ^ ^ *~ ^ ^aOJ NJ ^ (O -^ 3O0
88-8 8
r ~7 "-35
-74
-89
5-
74147186-
175
11777-
41——————————————
48
62
79
113
149
198
254 330-
433
579
734967
14922361
3198
3731 -
r 3681
2922 1849
* * * m 1017
2.17305
Scale 1:250050 0 50 100 150
fmeters^
lllllllllllHllIIHnull mi limn HI inn linn mi in lin UHI mi IHU us nui niu HID nil m miS2K02SE0001 2 17305 MCILRAITH 240
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY***
TOTAL FIELD POSTINGSBowdidae August 1996
s 8 8 8 8
LEGEND
Instrument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovic
Contours: Total field in nTContour Intervals: 50, 250, 1000 nT
Diurnal Correction: Base station
60100
! i!!!!
TOTAL HELDIN nT ~-
JUNE 1996 BASELINE
50Scale 1:2500
o_____so_____100 150
(meters)
----
8
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD.MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL FIELD CONTOURSBowdidge August 1996
s
******************************* LEGEND
Insirument: EDA Omni PlusOperator: D. Dmitrovic
Profile: Total field in nTBase Value: 59,000 nT
Profile Scale: 1 cm = 200 nTPositive Direction: Right
Diurnal Correction: Base station
JUNE 1996 BASELINE
50Scale 1:2500
O 50 100 150
(meters)
STUARTON RESOURCES LTD. MCILRAITH TOWNSHIP GRID
DRYDEN AREANORTH-WEST ONTARIO
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL FIELD PROFILESBowdidge August 1996