2
CLAS INSTRUCTIONAL FACULTY REAPPOINTMENT REVIEW FORM Name: _____________________________________ Department: ___________________ Reviewer name: ________________________________ Review period: _________________ I. TEACHING. Percentage of appointment devoted to teaching organized courses: ______ Number of organized courses taught in review period: ______ Total enrollments: _____ Please respond to questions below based on review of syllabus, course materials, and student evaluations of teaching. Teaching Yes No 1. The syllabi are well organized. 2. Goals and objectives for the courses are appropriate. 3. Tests assess the material taught in the class. 4. Teaching evaluations are favorable. 5. Teaching materials (e.g., textbook, readings, etc.) are appropriate for the courses taught. 6. The courses demand an appropriate level of intellectual rigor for students. 7. Grading criteria are clear. 8. Lecturer is available to students for questions and other issues pertaining to the course. Reviewer’s Comments on Teaching, including results of classroom evaluation: (course observed: ______________________________________ date: _________) Go to Page 2 (Service, Professional Development)

CLAS INSTRUCTIONAL FACULTY REAPPOINTMENT REVIEW FORM

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CLAS INSTRUCTIONAL FACULTY

REAPPOINTMENT REVIEW FORM

Name: _____________________________________ Department: ___________________

Reviewer name: ________________________________ Review period: _________________ I. TEACHING. Percentage of appointment devoted to teaching organized courses: ______

Number of organized courses taught in review period: ______ Total enrollments: _____

Please respond to questions below based on review of syllabus, course materials, and student evaluations of teaching.

Teaching Yes No

1. The syllabi are well organized.

2. Goals and objectives for the courses are appropriate.

3. Tests assess the material taught in the class.

4. Teaching evaluations are favorable.

5. Teaching materials (e.g., textbook, readings, etc.) areappropriate for the courses taught.

6. The courses demand an appropriate level of intellectual rigorfor students.

7. Grading criteria are clear.

8. Lecturer is available to students for questions and other issuespertaining to the course.

Reviewer’s Comments on Teaching, including results of classroom evaluation: (course observed: ______________________________________ date: _________)

Go to Page 2 (Service, Professional Development)

CLAS Instructional Faculty Reappointment Review Form Page 2

II. SERVICE. Number of advisees (if any) ______

Please list other departmental service assignments for the review period:

____________________________________________ _____________ Signature of Reviewer Date

Instructional Faculty's Response (optional) (limit 500 characters):

_____________________________________________ Signature of Instructional Faculty (not required if signed in workflow)

_____________ Date

Reviewer's Comments on Professional Development (limit 300 characters):

II. Professional Development. Please list activities during review period:

Reviewer's Comments on Service (limit 500 characters):

Based on the facts presented in the dossier and my own independent assessment, I recommend _________________ for an additional ________-year term (3 for FN15 and 5 for FN12 or FN11). Please attach new signed offer letter.

DEO Signature:_____________________Based on the facts presented in the dossier and my own independent assessment, I do not recommend __________________ for contract renewal. The upcoming ____________ (AY or semester) will be your terminal appointment. Your termination date will be __________________

DEO Signature:_______________________pending Dean approval.