17
Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background PSERC Summer Workshop July, 2015

Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel BackgroundPSERC Summer Workshop

July, 2015

Page 2: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Overview

• Legal Underpinnings

• Overview of Rule

– Timeline

– Targets

How developed

States’ interim and 2030 targets

• Legal Challenges / Responses

• Public Analyses and Impacts

2

Page 3: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Legal Underpinnings

• June 2013 President released Climate Action Plan

• Called for EPA to propose “carbon pollution” standards by June 2014

– To be finalized by June 2015

• Proposal relies on authority given EPA by Congress in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA)

• EPA has proposed “guideline document” with emission rate targets by state

– Interim targets (2020s) and final target (2030)

• Policies to reach the goals determined by the states

3

Page 4: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Overview of the 111(d) Rule

• Proposes state-specific emission rate-based CO2 goals with various options for compliance

• Offers guidelines for the development, submission and implementation of state plans to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from existing fossil-fired power plants

• Reflects emissions reductions that can be achieved by the application of the Best System of Emission Reduction (BSER)….adequately demonstrated.

• Initial proposed rule sets state goals for emission rates – as pounds of CO2 emissions per megawatt-hour of electricity produced – not absolute emissions

• “30% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030” is estimated impact, not the rule 4

Page 5: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

5

Clean Power Plan Milestones

June 2,

2014

Draft rule

issued

Dec 1,

2014

Comments due to EPA

June

2015

Final rule expected

June

2016

State Plans due

June

2017

State plans due (with one-year

extension)

June

2018

Multi-state plans due (with two-year

extension)

January

2020-29

Interim goals in effect

January

2030

Final goals in effect

Over 4 million comments received

Now expected in August

Due one year after final rule

issued

Page 6: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

How Targets Were Developed

6

• EPA used four “ building blocks” to develop emissions reduction targets

Page 7: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

State Targets

7

Page 8: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Additional Approaches to Meeting CO2 Targets

• Co-firing/switching to natural gas, or other lower carbon fuels

• “Flip the Stack” and/or operate coal during peak load periods

• New natural gas combined cycle generation (NGCC)

• Heat rate improvements for fossil generators

• Transmission efficiency improvements

• Energy storage technology

• Retirements

• Emission trading programs 8

Page 9: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Challenges to CPP

By the fall of 2014, 18 state legislatures had passed either legislation or resolutions that negated the EPA’s CO2

Emission Guidelines. See http://www.wbklaw.com/uploads/file/Articles-%20News/EPA's%20CO2%20Rules%20and%2018%20States'%20Resolutions%20and%20Legislation.pdf.

US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled June 9th that an appeal regarding the legality of the CPP by a dozen AGs and Murray Energy was premature, since it wasn’t a final rule. Stay tuned…

9

Page 10: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

NERC’s Reliability Assessment

• The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation mix and transform grid-level reliability services, diversity, and flexibility

• Industry needs more time to develop coordinated plans to address shifts in generation and corresponding transmission reinforcements to address proposed CPP CO2 interim and other emission targets

• Implementation plans may change the use of remaining coal-fired generating fleet from baseload to seasonal peaking, potentially eroding plant economics and operating flexibility

10

Page 11: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

SPP Analyses

• Reliability (October 2014): system intact and N-1

• Assumptions:

– Retirement of approximately 9,000 MW of coal and gas fired units (6,000 MW more than currently planned)

– Transfers from SPP and MISO to AR and LA

– Part 1: retired capacity replaced by existing unused capacity

– Part 2: retired capacity replaced by new gas and wind

• Results

– Part 1: voltage collapse until addition of 5,200 MVars reactive capability

– Part 2: 38 overloaded elements under N-1; voltage collapse in some areas

11

Page 12: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

SPP Analyses

• Economic analysis of Regional implementation (April 2015)

• Approach:

– Use PROMOD production cost model

– Develop 2030 reference case, assumed “copper sheet”

– Evaluate range of carbon-reduction measures for SPP

• Results – to meet compliance goal, needed:

– $45/ton CO2 price; 2,200 MW additional coal retirements; 5,600 MW of wind added; 3,600 MW CCs assumed to be CTs instead

– Incremental production and generation capital costs = $2.9 billion/year

12

Page 13: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

PJM Analyses

• Economic analysis (November 2014)

– 17 scenarios evaluated using range of assumptions including:

Gas prices

Fossil and nuclear resources

Renewable resources

Energy efficiency

– Results

Coal generation retired gradually

Increases in Load Energy Payments vary depending on levels of renewables, energy efficiency, new combined-cycle gas, and price of natural gas

Adding more energy efficiency, renewable energy and retaining more nuclear generation would lead to lower CO2 prices

13

Page 14: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

MISO Analysis

• Phase 1: Regional approach more cost-effective

• Phase 2: Resource Mix Analysis (no infrastructure)

– 1,296 cases analyzed

– Results: lowest compliance costs meeting the target includes

Carbon price $25

Additional 14 GW of coal retirements

Energy efficiency of 0.75% of sales

Current renewable policies14

Page 15: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

MISO Analysis

• Phase 3 (partially complete)

– Analysis of transmission and gas infrastructure needed under several Clean Power Plan Scenarios

Business as Usual

Business as Usual with Clean Power Plan constraints

Coal-to-Gas Conversions

Gas Build-Out

Gas, Wind and Solar Build-Out

Energy Efficiency, Wind and Solar

– Results

Production costs lower with retirements and regional approach

Congestion increases under all compliance approaches

15

Page 16: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Recent Developments

• Final rule to White House as part of interagency review in early June

• Expect Final CPP Rule to be released this summer

• EISPC/NARUC issued “Multistate Coordination Resources for Clean Power Plan Compliance: Sample Documents for Consideration” in June

• At MARC on June 8th, EPA staff indicated final rule to include relaxed interim goals and informal ways for state to collaborate to ease compliance.

• Options create uncertainties, which are good and bad.

• New news everyday. Stay tuned…16

Page 17: Clean Power Plan Section 111(d) Panel Background · NERC’s Reliability Assessment • The proposed CPP is expected to accelerate a fundamental changes in electricity generation

Jay CasparyDirector – Research, Development & Special [email protected]

17