15
CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program G. Riddone, 21.10.2009 aim of this presentation is to show the test program for the CLEX mo receive feedbacks from the BP WG

CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

  • Upload
    badu

  • View
    30

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The aim of this presentation is to show the test program for the CLEX modules and receive feedbacks from the BP WG. CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program. G. Riddone, 21.10.2009. Content. Test program CLIC modules  LAB (no beam) CLEX modules  CLEX ( with beam). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

CLIC beam physics meetingTest module program

G. Riddone, 21.10.2009

The aim of this presentation is to show the test program for the CLEX modules and receive feedbacks from the BP WG

Page 2: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

Content

Test program

CLIC modules LAB (no beam)

CLEX modules CLEX (with beam)

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.20092

Page 3: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

Motivation for Test Modules

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.20093

One of the feasibility issues is the two beam acceleration (two beam module is part of the program)

Address feasibility issues in an integrated approach e.g. RF structures, stabilization-alignment-supporting

systems

Establish coherence between existing test set-up up to future test modules in CLEX

Validate technical systems (tests in the labs) - if possible use components from stand-alone tests for test modules in CLEX

Validate two-beam acceleration scheme (tests in CLEX with beam)

Page 4: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

Test modules

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.20094

CLIC modules(as much as possible

close to CLIC modules)

CLEX test modules (Eucard – NCLinac –WP9.2/9.3) (to be adapted to test infrastructures)

We have to establish a test program with clear

milestones before and after CDR

TEST MODULESone project with two parallel lines

Page 5: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

Strategy for main linac two-beam module validation

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.2009

5

Page 6: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

Objectives of the CLIC modules

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.20096

Integration of all technical systems (dummy RF structures and quadrupoles can be used – real dead weight and interfaces to other systems)

Full metrology Pre-alignment of MB and DB, including fiducialisation Interconnections validation under different simulated thermal

loads Stabilisation of main beam quad in the module environment Vibration study of all systems and identification of vibration

sources Measurement of resonant frequencies (both in lab and in the

tunnel/underground area) Heating in several thermal cycles. Measurements of thermal

transient e.g. how long it takes to achieve a new equilibrium state. Transport of the module and verification of alignment

Page 7: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

CLIC modules (LAB)

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.2009

7

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Pre-alignment validation with dummy elements Interconnections - pumping (static conditions) Repositioning Measurements of resonant frequenciesTransport and thermal cyclesMeasurements of resonant frequencies

Stabilization (Q) and pre-alignment compatibilityVibration study of all system and vibration sources

The test module types 0-1-4 are representative of all module types

Action: add one Type 0 module

Page 8: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

014 CLIC modules

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.20098

Type 0

Type 1

Type 4

A. Samoshkin

Page 9: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

Objectives of the CLEX modules

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.20099

Two-beam acceleration in a realistic environment Cost- and performance optimized structures and their integration in CLIC

modules. Accelerating structure (ACS) alignment on girder using probe beam Wakefield monitor (WFM) performance in low and high power conditions

(and after a breakdown) Investigation of the breakdown effect on the beam

Alignment and stabilization systems in a dynamic accelerator environment RF network phase stability especially independent alignment of linacs Vacuum system performance especially dynamics with rf Cooling system especially dynamics due to beam loss and power flow

changes

Integration of all different sub-systems: , i.e. to simultaneously satisfy requirements of highest possible gradient, power handling, tight mechanical tolerances and heavy HOM damping

Validation of assembly, transport, activation, maintenance etc.

Page 10: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.2009

10

Choke mode flange

AS (CLIC-G)

PETS (mini tank)

Compact couplerwith internal splitter

ON/OFF unit

130 MW

Coupler with internal splitter

“Hammer” 3 dB splitter

3 dB splitter

RF load ~ 65 MW (tbc)

RF diagnostic

PETS (mini tank)

AS AS AS

DB Quad

CLIC module type 0

From CLIC module to CLEX module

Page 11: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

PETS PETS

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.2009

11

AS (CLIC-G)

Compact couplerwith internal splitter

Coupler with internal splitter

“Hammer” 3 dB splitter

3 dB splitter

RF load

RF diagnostic

PETS (mini tank)

AS AS AS

DB Quad

Existing 1-m PETS with recirculation

CLEX module type 0

From CLIC module to CLEX module

Page 12: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

CLEX modules

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.2009

14 accelerating structures5 PETS

12

750

mm

Phase 3: Modules 0 and 4Phase 4: Module 1 - 4.1: double length PETS- 4.2: two CLIC PETS replacing 1

double length PETS

FINAL C

ONFIGURATIO

N

Accuracy of 5 um is an issue: few WFM in a single structure

Page 13: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

CLEX modules - configurations

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.2009

13

No modifications on the test module type 0 HWNo RecirculationCurrent increase from 12 A to 19.2 APulse length reduced from 240 ns to 140 ns

No modifications on the test module type 0 HWAddition of a module type 1Increase of current from 19.2 A to 22 A

Phase 3, Conf. 3.1

Phase 3, Conf. 3.3

Phase 4, Conf. 4.1

Phase 4, Conf. 4.2

Nominal power and pulse length for 1 PETS and 2 ASRecirculation12 A and 240 ns

Modification on the test module type 1 HW (2 CLIC PETS)Needed klystrons and PC

Page 14: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.2009

Preliminary

integration study

of CLEX MODULES

014

A. Solodko

T0

T4

T1

Beam

Double-length PETS

14

Page 15: CLIC beam physics meeting Test module program

CONCLUSIONS

G. Riddone, Beam Physics meeting, 21.10.200915

Baseline defined for CDR Two alternative configurations to be studied: monogorder

and additional 1-cm long magnet in front of each quad decision by end of October 2010

In parallel study of other alternatives (e.g. cam system) Design has to be frozen by 1Q 2010 – a lot of work and

limited resources: needed close collaboration with all technical experts ADDITIONAL MANPOWER NEEDED, proposal for a meeting next week with JPD and HS agreement is urgent

Test module project with two parallel lines: in the lab (from 2010) in CLEX (from 2011) [also part of EuCARD – WP9.2 (G.

Riddone /WP9.3 (A. Jeremie)) ADDITIONAL MANPOWER NEEDED, meeting next week

with JPD and HS