Upload
noah-black
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Clients Summary • Identity: Understanding of TLS scope• Relationships: Many/Broad; Partnerships to
meet greatest needs – prioritisation of work with schools using data
• Information: Coordination access to schools; Communication processes SM and TLS
• Intention: External disruption / expertise, followed up by site based leaders
• Intention: Keeping current best practice • Principles: Focus on today and future• Tensions: Building ownership for what’s
happening in the school with the school • Work: Expand skill-sets/build school capacity
TLS Teams• Identity: meshed, function not team focused; professional learning
focused; • Intention: content/program areas; “sharing and changing the
chairs”; improving student outcomes broad and specific; prioritise learners with greater needs
• Relationships: many, grouped by ‘distance/context’ – student, school, corporate, community, national; processes for meeting client needs -TLS coordinator between schools/GM/TLS (connector); capacity building of staff in the school community;
• Information: communicating all priority student outcomes
Policy Quality Assurance
Coordination Operational
Students as the focus through …..•Data Literacy•Ways of learning and working together to improve outcomes•Design for learning •Priority/Needs Driven balanced with Futures Driven (around the corner…)•Expert disruption – Challenge with Support •Capacity Building esp indigenous educators•Voice and visibility of indigenous educators
•Client needs focused•Seeing successes using student data
•Building active leadership within the school •Sharing and changing chairs •Prioritisation •Building and sustaining long term models •Tools to match needs
Prioritise greatest need using data
Identity and Intention
Relationships• Internal connectivity around functions / priorities – meshed not separated/pigeon
holed
• Coordination of connectivity
• Students – School Staff – School Community - Corporate – National
• Local capacity building esp indigenous staff
• Systems for formal partnerships
• Giving voice/ making invisible visible
Information/ Communication• Shared skillsets, eg coaching models
• Broader picture of valued student outcomes
• Ways for thinking, knowing, sharing together
• Shared voices based on research-evidence through policy/language/models
Principles
• Professional trust
• Collaboration with shared responsibility – within, within to with-out
• Connectivity within and across
• Evidence based
Tensions
• Expert disruption/challenge with support for improvement
• APIF targeted and individual teacher performance review focused learning needs
• “Both” functions
• Touch on need then expected to move on
• Timely access to data
• Competing interest / agendas/ beliefs / needs / priorities
Structures
• To monitor improvements
• Functions / Priorities driven - connectivity
• Tools to meet client needs - distance learning access for remote communities
• Adult education esp indigenous staff – partnerships with tertiary
What do we want for ourselves for the future of (TLS)?
• Interconnectivity• Building capacity all stakeholders many means • Advocacy and leader for data• Formalise processes and protocols working• It’s The Student Stupid ITSS• Its all about the students so solutions rather than problems• Innovation through research that embeds best practice • Improving student outcomes challenge support culture of trust• Hearing indigenous voices and actioning tools, pathways, processes
for full and active participation in education• Building strong foundations • Strong relationships and partnerships