Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Climate change and land-use interactions affect
aquatic ecosystems
Dr. John Richardson
FAFU
courses.forestry.ubc.ca/frst386/
“Rivers in some of the world’s most populous regions
are losing water, ...”
"The distribution of the world's fresh water, already an important
topic," says Cliff Jacobs of NSF's Division of Atmospheric Sciences,
"will occupy front and center stage for years to come in developing
adaptation strategies to a changing climate.”
Of rivers examined, more than 70% were decreasing (period
1948 to 2004)
Including: Yellow River (China), Ganges (India), Niger (west
Africa), Colorado (SW USA)
Rivers that were increasing were largely northern rivers,
increased by glacier melt
Appear to be related to climate change (consistent with all
predictions, but of course there is no way to test this directly)
NSF – National Science Foundation (USA)
Predictions about
climate
Consequences from
different aspects of
climate change
Responses of aquatic
systems
Outline
photo: courtesy Dr. Mark Wipfli, U of Alaska
Source: US Geological Service (USGS)
Surface water is ~0.009% of total
http://www.metoffice.com/research/hadleycentre/models/modeldata.html
Change in annual average surface air temperature from
1960-1990 to 2070-2100 from HadCM2 IS92a
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, the Met. Office, UK
Change in June-July-August average surface air temperature
from 1960-1990 to 2070-2100 from HadCM2 IS92a
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Change in annual average precipitation from
1960-1990 to 2070-2100 from HadCM2 IS92a
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Change in June-July-August average precipitation from
1960-1990 to 2070-2100 from HadCM2 IS92a
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Change in annual average soil moisture content from
1960-1990 to 2070-2100 from HadCM2 IS92a
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Change in June-July-August average soil moisture content
from 1960-1990 to 2070-2100 from HadCM2 IS92a
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Biggest effect on aquatic resources will likely be in summer
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/hadleycentre/pubs/brochures/2005/clim_green/slide32.pdf
Predicted change in global river flow between present day and the
late 21st century for SRES emissions scenario A1B
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Potential impacts on:
Flows (averages, peaks, lows)
Timing of flows
Temperatures
Water quality (pH, nutrients, etc.)
Quality of organic matter
Timing of life cycle events
20th century was the wettest century in the past 1000 years!
Transpiration
Interaction of vegetation in H2O cycle
Evaporation
~98% of water taken up by roots is lost by transpiration through leaf stomata
e.g. 15 m high Silver Maple (Acer saccharinum) can loose 220 litres
water per hour through transpiration
↓ stomatal conductance →
↓ transpiration
↑ soil moisture & runoff
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Transpiration
Surface
evaporation
Surface runoff
Subsurface runoff Infiltration
Precipitation
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
CO2 concentration inside leaf (ppmv)
Sto
ma
tal co
nd
ucta
nce
(m
/s)
↑ [CO2] → ↓ stomatal conductance Plant response to [CO2] –
physiological forcing stomatal conductance
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Projected global average river flow with & without CO2 effect on plants business-as-usual scenario
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Projected changes in river flow with & without CO2 effects on plants average 2071-2100 minus 1971-2000
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, UK
Some predicted consequences of climate change for aquatic systems
Summers: warmer temperatures,
less rainfall, & higher evapo-
transpiration less water for
aquatic environments (unless
reduction in evapotranspiration is
sufficient due to increased CO2)
Headwater streams will be most
impacted by changes (and made
worse by water extraction from
groundwater, i.e., wells)
Winters: warmer winters mean less
storage as snow, so less available
during summer
Some consequences of climate change for aquatic systems
The minimal water flows, and not
the averages, are the impacts
that are most difficult to plan for,
and the most damaging for
aquatic ecosystems
More dams and greater extraction
– less water in lakes, reservoirs
and rivers
Warmer water and higher
concentrations of contaminants
Carnation Creek, BC
“Water for Life” – United Nations International
Decade for Action – 2005 – 2015
Over-
exploitation Water
pollution
Habitat
degradation
Flow
modification
Species
invasion
Dudgeon, D. et al. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status
and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163-186.
World Resources Institute
Hu
ma
n w
ate
r
se
cu
rity
th
rea
t
Th
rea
t to
bio
div
ers
ity
Vörösmarty CJ et al. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555-561.
Vörösmarty CJ et al. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555-561.
High Low
Low
High
Human water
security threat
Threat to
biodiversity
Threats – Increasing need for power – more dams?
Water crisis closes Tofino businesses
Resort town is forced to ration drinking water, turn away visitors
Vancouver Sun, 30 August 2006
Headline
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/hadleycentre/pubs/brochures/2005/clim_green/slide33.pdf
Schindler, DW & WF Donahue. 2006. An impending water crisis in Canada’s western
prairie provinces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 7210-7216.
0 500 1000
km
Canada
Rocky Mountains
Pacific
Ocean
Prairies
Using up “fossil” water
Greig HS, Kratina P, Thompson PL, Palen WJ, Richardson JS & Shurin JB.
2012. Warming, eutrophication, and predator loss amplify subsidies between
aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology 18: 504–514.
+ 3°C warming year-round
+ or – Three-spined Sticklebacks
Ambient or increased nutrients (N, P) Complex outcomes!
Hogg I.D. & Williams D.D. 1996. Response of stream invertebrates to a global-warming
thermal regime: An ecosystem-level manipulation. Ecology 77: 395-407.
control
Hogg I.D. & Williams D.D. 1996. Response of stream invertebrates to a global-warming
thermal regime: An ecosystem-level manipulation. Ecology 77: 395-407.
Hogg I.D. & Williams D.D. 1996. Response of stream invertebrates to a global-warming
thermal regime: An ecosystem-level manipulation. Ecology 77: 395-407.
Adult sizes of Nemoura trispinosa
(Plecoptera – stoneflies)
Emergence timing of adults of the
caddisfly Lepidostoma vernale
Kominoski, J.S. et al. 2007. Elevated CO2 alters
leaf-litter-derived dissolved organic carbon:
effects on stream periphyton and crayfish
feeding preference. Journal of the North
American Benthological Society 26: 663-672.
p = 0.02
3 7 12 25 35
Sampling day
p < 0.05 Ambient
Elevated
25
20
15
10
5
0
Bio
volu
me
(mm
3/c
m2 x
10
3)
1.5
1.0
0.5
0 Ch
l a (
µg/c
m2)
DOC from poplar
leaves grown under
ambient CO2 levels, or
2x ambient (720 ppm)
DOC from leaves grown under elevated
[CO2 ] had molecules that were harder to
break down, and therefore contributed less
to biofilm (periphyton) development
Kominoski, J.S. et al. 2007. Elevated CO2 alters leaf-litter-derived dissolved organic
carbon: effects on stream periphyton and crayfish feeding preference. Journal of the North
American Benthological Society 26: 663-672.
p < 0.05
Ambient Elevated
Tim
e (
s)
300
200
100
0
Crayfish Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Crayfish preferred periphyton (biofilm)
produced with ambient DOC (from poplar
leaves) over DOC from leaves grown at 2X
CO2 concentrations
Hari, R.E. et al. 2006. Consequences of climatic change for water temperature and brown
trout populations in Alpine rivers and streams. Global Change Biology 12: 10-26.
North American
Water and Power
Alliance
(NAWAPA) –
Ralph M. Parsons
Company,
California
For additional reading, see Nature – 20 March 2008
Perhaps increased trade in “virtual water” instead
Summary
Many dimensions to changes in climate:
temperature, rainfall, CO2, food quality, less
storage as snow, seasonality, …
Some consequences: higher peak flows, lower
summer flows, warmer summer temperatures
A great deal of uncertainty, however, all
predictions are for change, and most changes
will be difficult to deal with
These changes will result in more and more
emphasis on forest management to protect
water yield, habitat quality, temperatures, and
water quality